Definition, Distinction and Classification: The Law On Public Officers
Definition, Distinction and Classification: The Law On Public Officers
Definition, Distinction and Classification: The Law On Public Officers
Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the
people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency, act with patriotism and
justice, and lead modest lives. (Art XI, Sec. 1)
Public office is not property – preclude any proprietary claim to public office.
o No one has any private right of property of vested right in any public office he holds.
o The incumbent’s right to office is recognized as a privilege entitle to the protection of the
law, an office may be considered as property within the protection of the due process
clause in controversies relation to the question as to which of the two persons is entitled
thereto.
o Public office is personal to the holder.
Public office is not a contract
o Not a natural right. Exists by virtue of some law.
o Salary is a mere incident and form no part of the office.
Public Office Public Contract
Creation Incident of sovereignty Originates from the will of the parties
Nature Carrying out of sovereign and governmental Imposes obligations only on
functions affecting all persons contracting parties
Subject Embraces the idea of tenure, duration and Limited to the duration and specific in
Matter continuity its object
Public office vs. public employment
o Every public office is a public employment but every public employment is not an office.
o Key considerations are the powers and responsibilities of public office
Delegation of sovereign functions and powers
Created by force of law and not by contract of employment
Essential elements of a public office
o Created by the Constitution or by law
Creation of public office
Constitution
By Congress – legislative function
By the President – reorganization measures
Modification or Abolition of public office included in power to create
Office created by Congress – may be modified and abolished by Congress
Office created by the Constitution – only modified or abolished by
amendment of Constitution
o Invested with an authority to exercise some portion of the sovereign power of the State
Public officers enjoy presumption of regularity in the exercise of their functions.
Overthrown only be evidence to the contrary
Presumption does not apply to acts not within the duties specified by law.
o Powers and functions defined by the Constitution or law
o Duties are performed independently
o Continuing and permanent in nature
o Period attached
May be fixed or at the pleasure of the appointing authority.
o Compensation not an essential element
De Jure Officer
o One who has the lawful right to the office in all respects, but who either been ousted from
it, or who has never actually taken possession of it.
Possess the legal qualifications for the office in question
Must be lawfully chosen to such office
Must have qualified himself to perform the duties of such office according to the
mode prescribed by the Constitution or law.
De Jure De Facto
Right Reputation
Lawful right or title to the office Color of authority or authority without being
technically qualified in all points of law to act
Cannot be removed in a direct proceeding May be ousted in a direct proceeding against him
Valid acts when it affects 3rd persons or the public
Can maintain an action for compensation Cannot maintain an action to recover salary except
when in good faith for services actually rendered
Liable for all penalties imposed by law for usurping
or unlawfully holding office, or exercising the
function without legal right or without be qualified.
EXCEPTION: If there is an incumbent de jure, he
may recover from a de facto the salary received
during the wrongful tenure, even though the de
facto acted in good faith. The de facto takes the
salaries at his risk and must, account to the de jure
for whatever he received during the wrongful
tenure. (General Manager, PPA v. Monserate)
Usurper – one who takes possession of the office and undertakes to act officially without any color
or right or authority, either actual or apparent. He is not an officer at all for any purpose
De Facto Usurper
Color of right or title to the office Neither lawful title nor color of right or title to the
office
Assumes to exercise his functions where the public Simply assumes to act as an officer where the public
does not know nor ought to know his lack of title or knows or ought to know that he is such a usurper
authority
May be removed only in a direct proceeding Can be ousted at any time in any proceeding
All acts otherwise legitimate in the exercise of his Acts are absolutely null and void
authority is valid
Monroy v. CA – Mayor filed certificate of candidacy, was deemed to have resigned. Later
withdraws candidacy, and reassumes Mayorship – de facto. Vice Mayor who took over
after the Mayor filed his candidacy has right to recover from de facto officer salary
received during his wrongful tenure.
General Manager v. Monserate - In cases where there is no de jure officer, a de facto
officer who, in good faith, has had possession of the office and has discharged the duties
pertaining thereto, is legally entitled to the emoluments of the office, and may in
appropriate action recover the salary, fees and other compensations attached to the
office. Where there is a de jure officer, a de facto officer, during his wrongful
incumbency, is not entitled to the emoluments attached to the office, even if he occupied
the office in good faith.
o Salary not subject to garnishment
Salary of a public officer or employee may not, by garnishment, attachment or order
of execution, be seized before being paid to him, and appropriated for the payment
of his debts.
o Agreements affecting compensation
Salaries before earned - An agreement may be considered invalid as against public
policy where it tends to pervert such compensation to a purpose other than that
which it was intended, and to interfere with the officer’s free and unbiased
judgment in relation to the duties of his office.
Salaries after earned – officer is free to contract his salaries as he may see fit.
o Prohibition against receiving additional, double or indirect compensation
Not applicable where: the payment is specifically authorized by law, the additional
compensation is not received from the government or any of its entities, and there
are two distinct offices, and there two distinct offices, each of which has its own
duties and compensation, in which case both may be held by one person at the same
time.
Pension or gratuities are not considered double compensation.
o Free voluntary service to the government
Receive no pay or compensation, but are exempt from filing SALN, divestment and
shall not enjoy security of tenure.
Functions limited to: advisory, consultancy or counseling, recommendatory,
professional services, staff work, or humanitarian.
Pension
o Regular allowances paid to an individual by the government in consideration of services
rendered, or in recognition of merit, civil or military.
o Burden is in the government to show that an applicant is not qualified for pension.
o Retirement laws shall be liberally construed and applied in favor of the persons intended to
be benefited by them, and all doubts as to the intent of the law should be resolved in favor
of the retiree. However, this does not apply where the clear intent of the applicable law and
rules are demonstrably against the retiree’s claim.
o Benefits under retirement laws cannot be withheld regardless of the employees monetary
liability to the government.
Right to reinstatement and back salary – separate and distinct reliefs given to an illegally
dismissed official and employee
o When removal or suspension is lawful
Not entitled to compensation. No work, no pay.
o When removal or suspension is unlawful
Since prevented for a time by no fault of his own, may recover the full amount of his
salary during the period of removal.
Earned salary from other employment should not be deducted
Still recoverable even if replacement has been paid
If bad faith by superior officers, they are personally accountable
Limited to a maximum of 5 years of backwages.
o Where suspended employee later found innocent
Backwages allowed if suspended before the period to appeal the decision of the CSC
has expired, therefore premature.
o Where employee not completely exonerated or reinstatement not the result of exoneration
Not entitled to the payment of his backwages. No work, no pay.
o Where another appointed to position of illegally dismissed or suspended employee
Illegally dismissed employee has a superior right over the position.
o Duty of plaintiff seeking reinstatement to prove his right to office
o Right to reinstatement to former or at least comparable position
If reinstatement not feasible, entitled to back salaries
o Duty to act with reasonable diligence in asserting right to reinstatement
Public officer or employee must file his right to reinstatement, back salaries, quo
warranto and mandamus within 1 year or else the right may be considered waiver
or shall prescribe.
o Where pardon extended to convicted employee
Does not restore a convicted to public office, merely restores his eligibility for
appointment to that office.
Right to property, devices and inventions
o If it is indispensable in the proper conduct of the office, public property. If not required by
law, prepared by the officer apart from his official duties and are not indispensable in the
proper conduct of the office, may acquire a property right which will entitle him to remove
them upon leaving office.
Right to recover reward for performance of duties
o It is the duty of a public officer to execute the functions of his office and will not be
permitted to recover reward offered by the public for the performance of an act which was
part of his official duty to perform if he could.
Other Rights
Constitution
o Self-organization – may form unions but are prohibited from conducting concerted activity
or mass action which cause work stoppage or service disruption.
o Protection of temporary employees – no security of tenure but protect from indiscriminate
dismissals
o Freedom of members of Congress from arrest and from being questioned
o Right not to be removed or suspended except for causes provided by law
Revised Government Service Insurance Act – GSIS membership to all employees upon assumption to
duty pursuant to a valid appointment or election and oath of office. EXCLUDED: AFP, PNP and not
receiving basic pay or salary
o Retirement benefits/Old age pension
At least 15 years of service, at least 60 years of age and is not receiving a monthly
pension benefit from permanent total disability
Compulsory age of retirement is 65
Rabor v. CSC - If he has less than 15 years of service, he shall be allowed to continue
in the service to complete the 15 years ONLY IF the extension is for 1 year. If more
than 1 year extension is need to complete the 15 years, extension is not allowed.
o Separation benefits – cash payment after retirement
o Unemployment or involuntary separation benefits – payment to permanent employees
involuntarily separated
o Disability benefits
o Survivorship benefits
o Funeral benefits
o Life insurance benefits
Civil Liability
Requisites: 1) Damage to an individual, and 2) Wrong or violation of the right of the individual
Criminal Liability
No public officer is above the law. All may be punished by criminal acts. The mere fact that an
officer is acting in an official capacity will not relieve him from criminal liability.
Expiration of term or reelection will not extinguish criminal liability.
Various Laws providing for penal acts and sanctions:
o Revised Penal Code
Malfeasance and misfeasance
Frauds and illegal exaction and transactions
Malversation of public funds or property
Infidelity of public officers
Other offenses and irregularities committed by public officers
o Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019)
o Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
o Forfeiture of Unexplained Wealth Act
o Civil Service Decree
o Government Auditing Code
o Local Government Code
o National Internal Revenue Code
o Omnibus Election Code
Liability of Specific Officials
President
o Civil responsibility – execution of the laws
o Criminal liability – an assault against the President is an offense against the State
o Liability for damages – the President should not be subjected curtly to personal liability for
damages resulting from the performance of official acts except by law equally express.
Executive Officials
o Government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from
liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established
statutory or constitutional rights which any reasonable person would have known.
o These acts are presumptively acts of the President.
Legislative Officials
o Not exempt from general liability, but only certain privileges –immunity from arrest and
free speech or debate.
o Extends to members of local legislative bodies.
Members of the Judiciary
o One claiming to have been injured by the officer’s judicial action within his jurisdiction can
sustain no civil action or administrative sanction against a judicial officer.
o In the absence of fraud, dishonesty, or corruption, the acts of a judge in his judicial capacity
do not always constitute misconduct and are not subject to disciplinary action, even though
such acts may be erroneous.
o But a judge may be held criminally liable for dereliction of duty for knowingly rendering an
unjust judgment or interlocutory order or for rendering a manifestly unjust judgment or
interlocutory order by reason of inexcusable negligence, ignorance of the law and
incompetence.
o Administrative charges against judges require more than substantial evidence, since they
are highly penal in character and are to be governed by the rule applicable to criminal
cases. But the Supreme Court later superseded the ruling and returned the quantum to
substantial evidence.
Quasi-judicial officers
o Exempt from civil liability for his quasi-judicial acts. He cannot be called upon to respond in
damages to the private individual for the honest exercise of his judgment within his
jurisdiction however erroneous or misguided his judgment may be.
o However, he may be liable for carelessness or negligence in the performance of ministerial
acts.
Ministerial officers
o Officer will be liable to such individual for any injury which he may proximately sustain in
consequence of the failure or neglect of the officer to perform the duty at all, or to perform
it properly.
o Requisites: 1) special and peculiar injury, 2) results from a breach of duty which the officer
owed to him.
o Classes of default in the performance:
Nonfeasance – neglect or refusal, without sufficient excuse, to perform an act
Misfeasance – failure to use, in the performance of a duty, that degree of care, skill
and diligence reasonably demanded
Malfeasance – doing, either through ignorance or malice, that which the officer has
no legal right to do at all
Superior officer for acts of subordinates
o General rule is that the subordinates, who are themselves public officers, are directly liable
in the cases in which any public officer is liable.
o Exception:
Superior negligently or willfully employs or retains unfit or improper persons
Negligently or willfully fails to require them the due conformity to the prescribed
regulations
He so carelessly or negligently oversees, conducts or carries on the business of his
office as to furnish the opportunity for the default
A fortiori, where he has directly, authorized or cooperated in the wrong
Liability is expressly provided in the statute
Wrongful acts, omissions of duty, negligence or misfeasance of his subordinate
where he has actually authorized by written order the specific act or omission
complained of
o Subordinates
A subordinate who acts in good faith under orders or instructions of a superior is
not personally liable in an action for damages.
But, an order of a superior is no justification for an unlawful and negligent act which
are contrary to law, morals, public policy or good custom on the part of a
subordinate officer, although it may mitigate liability for damages.
Tortious acts
o Acts done within scope of official authority – public officer not personally liable
o Acts done without or in excess of official authority – not immune from suit for their own
tortious conduct, even when such conduct is committed in the course of their employment
Under the Civil Code
o For Failure or neglect to perform official duty (Art. 27)
o For violating rights and liberties of private individuals (Art. 32)
o Failure to render aid or protection to a person (Art. 34)
Contracts executed in behalf of the government
o Public officers acting within the scope of their authority are not personally liable on
contracts executed in behalf of the government unless they execute an unambiguous
personal undertaking which makes no mention of the public agency he serves, or does not
indicate that it is executed in an official capacity.
Unexplained wealth
(RA 1379 Forfeiture of Unexplained Wealth Act)
o Any public official or employee who has acquired an amount of property which is
manifestly out of proportion to his salary shall be presumed prime facie to have been
unlawfully acquired.
o Procedural matters – civil in nature
o Substantial rights – criminal in nature
Garcia v. Sandiganbayan – Prior to Feb. 25, 1986 the Ombudsman could only investigate
and needed to course the case through the Solicitor General. After Feb. 25, the Ombudsman
no has the power to file a case with the Sandiganbayan.
Accountable officers to the government
o Bond requirement
o Head of any agency is immediately and primarily responsible for all government funds and
property pertaining to his agency. Persons entrusted with the possession or custody of the
funds under the agency head shall be immediately responsible to him, without prejudice to
the liability of either party to the government.
o General liability for unlawful expenditures to the official or employee found to be directly
responsible
o Accountable for its money value as well as all the losses, damages, or deterioration
occasioned by negligence in the keeping or use.
o No accountable officer shall be relieved from liability by reason of his having acted under
the direction of a superior officer unless prior to that act, he notified the superior officer in
writing of the illegality of the payment, application or disposition.
Natural Causes
Expiration of Term
o Fixed and definite time prescribed by law or the Constitution
o For primary confidential employees, term ends upon the loss of confidence.
o Holding-over period, when the public officer continues to hold the office despite the
expiration of this term until his successor is appointed or chosen.
Usually provided by law. If not provided, the prevailing opinion is that, unless
prohibited, the incumbent may continue to hold until some else is elected or
qualified to assume the office.
Lecaros v. Sandiganbayan – no hold-over provision, must still hold over to prevent
hiatus in the government, unless there is an express or implied prohibition.
When Constitution provides for a term, holding is not permitted.
A public officer who holds over is a de jure officer if holding over is authorized by
law; otherwise, he is a de facto officer.
o Offices created for a specific act – the office terminates and the officer’s authority ceases
with the accomplishment of the purpose. The office is deemed functus officio.
Age Limit
o Compulsory and automatic retirement of a public officer
o SC and judges – 70 years old
o Public Officers and employees – 65 years old
Death or permanent disability
o For permanent disability, the appointing power will have to make the decision whether his
condition has created a vacancy but a judicial determination of the fact is necessary to
render it conclusive.
Remedies
o Petition to deny due course to or cancel a certificate of candidacy (Sec. 78)
Verified petition may be filed by any person exclusively on the ground that any
material representation contained in his COC is false.
False representation on material matters/qualifications of a candidate (ex.
Citizenship, residence, etc)
Not later than 25 from the time of the filing of a COC
o Cancellation of certificate by Commission – nuisance candidate (Sec. 69)
Commission mot proprio may or upon verified petition of an interested party, refuse
to give due course to or cancel a COC
Certificate has be filed to put the election process in mockery or disrepute
Filed to cause confusion among voters, having similar names with candidate
Candidate has no bona fide intention to run
o Disqualification (Sec. 68)
Insane or incompetent
Sentence to final judgment for subversion, insurrection, rebellion or for any offense
with a penalty of 18 months or a crime involving moral turpitude
Found guilty of giving money to voters or public officials, terrorism, excessive
campaign expenses, solicited or received prohibited contributions, violated Sections
80, 83, 85, 86, and 261 of the Omnibus Election Code
Permanent resident or an immigrant to a foreign country
Petition to deny due course/cancel COC Petition for Disqualification
(78) (68)
Grounds Misrepresentation in the COC Election Offense
2nd place Declared winner Cannot be declared as winner.
(Maquiling v. COMELEC) (Labo v. COMELEC)
Substitutio No substitution of candidate May substitute disqualified
n candidate
Filing 25 days from filing of the COC Anytime until proclamation
Candidacy Not a candidate at all. Void ab initio Bona Fide candidate until
disqualified
o Failure of Election
COMELEC sitting en banc is vested with exclusive jurisdiction
Three conditions:
No voting
o No election is held – in any polling place & date fixed
o Election is suspended - before the hour fixed by law
o Election is held – during the preparation and the transmission of the
election returns or in the custody, or canvass thereof, such election
results in a failure to elect.
Votes affect the result of the election
Caused on account of force majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud or other
analogous causes
Special elections should be reasonably close to the date of the election, an d not later
than 30 days after the cessation of the cause of the postponement.
o Pre-proclamation
Infra
o Election Protest
Infra
o Quo Warranto (Sec. 253)
Any voter contesting the election on the ground of disqualification or disloyalty to
the Republic of the Philippines
Filed after the elections, within 10 days from results of the election
Infra
6. Contested Elections
Pre-proclamation controversy
o Any question on matter pertaining to or affecting the proceedings of the board of
canvassers which may be raised by the candidate or by any registered political party or
coalition of political parties before the board or directly with the COMELEC.
o Limited to challenges directed against the board of canvassers and the proceedings before
said board relating to election returns.
o COMELEC has exclusive jurisdiction involving local elective officials.
No pre-proclamation cases in election of President, VP, Senators, Congress. Only
allowed is the correction of “manifest errors in the certificate of canvass or election
returns”
o May order the partial or total suspension or annulment of proclamation
o Summary in nature – use as basis records and evidence elevated to it by the BOC.
o Grounds:
Illegal composition the Board of Canvassers
Legal qualifications and appointments of the members
Illegal proceedings of the Board of Canvassers
Results of which are pre-determined and manipulated as when any of the ff
circumstances are present:
o Precipitate canvassing
o Terrorism
o Lack of sufficient notice to the members of the BOCs
o Improper venue
Manifest errors in the certificate of canvass or election returns – ONLY for
National elective officials
o Error must appear on the face of the COC or ER
o Objection made before BOC and noted in the minutes of the
proceeding
o Filed within 5 days from proclamation
o All pre-proclamation cases pending before the Commission shall be deemed terminated at
the beginning of the term of the office involved, without prejudice to the filing of a regular
election protests by the aggrieved party.
However, the proceedings may continue when on the basis of evidence the
COMELEC determines that the petition appears meritorious and accordingly issues
an order for the proceeding to continue or when an appropriate order has been
issued by the SC in a petition for certiorari.
Running of the period to file an election protest shall be deemed suspended.
o Filing of an election protests or a petition for quo warranto bars the subsequent filing of a
pre-proclamation controversy or a petition to annul proclamation. It amounts to the
abandonment of one filed earlier, thus depriving the COMELEC of the authority to inquire
into and pass upon the title of the protestee or the validity of his proclamation.
Exception:
What is filed is not really a quo warranto or election protests but a petition to
annul a proclamation
Quo warranto is not the proper remedy
The BOC is improperly constituted
The filing of a quo warranto or an election protest is expressly made without
prejudice to pre-proclamation contests or is made ad cautelam
The proclamation is null and void.
Election Contest
o Filed by a defeated candidate who has duly filed his certificate of candidate and has been
voted for the same office.
o Lodged only against a proclaimed candidate
o Grounds
Fraud, terrorism, irregularities or illegal acts committed before, during, or after the
casting and counting of votes
o Must be filed within 10 days from the proclamation of the election results
o Election contest is imbued with public interest
Time is of the essence
Death of either would not oust the court of all authority to continue the protest
proceedings
Election laws are liberally construed – technical and procedural barriers should not
be allowed to stand if they constitute an obstacle to the determination of the true
will of the electorate in the choice of their elective officials
Failure to raise ground or to appeal is not lethal to the case
Execution pending appeal allowed upon good reason
Rules of Court are suppletory in character and apply whenever practicable
and convenient.
Demurrer to evidence not applicable
o Jurisdiction
Local Officials - COMELEC
Municipal and Barangay Officials – RTC and MTC COMELEC
Congress – HRET
HRET gains jurisdiction only upon 1) Proclamation, 2) Proper oath and 3)
Assumes office (Reyes v. COMELEC)
President & VP – Supreme Court
o Assumption of office during pendency of election protest
Execution pending appeal allowed only upon good reasons
Public interest involved or the will of the electorate
The shortness of the remaining portion of the term of the contested office
The length of time that the election contests has been pending
o Always construe in favor of the sanctity of the ballot
o Evidence on the election
Election returns
Ballots
Must be preserved with a care which precludes the opportunity of tampering
and all suspicion of change, abstraction or substitution
Poll-books and tally sheets
Election officials
Voters
Certificate of votes
Thumbprints of voters
o Right of winner in an election contest to recover damages
Actual or compensatory damages, attorney’s fees
Ratio: Civil Code provides that damages must be in accordance with law, or in this
case, under the chapter on human relations.
Must be based on a wrongful act or omission or breach of obligation of the losing
party.
7. Election Offenses
Jurisdiction
o Investigate and Prosecute
COMELEC has the power, concurrent with the other prosecuting arms of the
government, to conduct preliminary investigations of all election offenses
punishable under the Code, and prosecute the same.
o Try and Decide violations of election law
RTC has the exclusive original jurisdiction to try and decide any criminal action or
proceeding for violation of the Code, except those relation to the offense of failure to
register or failure to vote which shall be under the jurisdiction of the MTC.
Election Offenses
Prescription – 5 years from the date of their commission