Overview of Autoimmune Hepatitis - UpToDate
Overview of Autoimmune Hepatitis - UpToDate
Overview of Autoimmune Hepatitis - UpToDate
www.uptodate.com ©2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Apr 2020. | This topic last updated: Feb 27, 2019.
INTRODUCTION
Although this disorder had been known by a variety of names, including lupoid hepatitis, plasma cell
hepatitis, and autoimmune chronic active hepatitis, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group
determined that autoimmune hepatitis was the most appropriate term for this disease [1].
An overview of autoimmune hepatitis will be provided here. Variant forms of autoimmune hepatitis
(ie, overlap syndromes) are discussed separately. (See "Autoimmune hepatitis variants: Definitions
and treatment".)
Autoimmune hepatitis can present at any age and in all ethnic groups, but it occurs predominantly in
women [2-5]. For type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, the female to male ratio is 4:1, but for type 2
autoimmune hepatitis, the ratio is 10:1 [6,7]. (See 'Autoantibodies' below.)
The worldwide incidence of autoimmune hepatitis ranges from 0.7 (southern Israel) to 2 (Canterbury,
New Zealand) per 100,000 population, while the prevalence ranges from 4 (Singapore) to 25
(Canterbury, New Zealand) per 100,000 [8-10]. In studies from Europe, the incidence is 0.9 to 2 per
100,000 population per year, with a prevalence of 11 to 25 per 100,000 population [4,8,11,12]. No
prevalence data on autoimmune hepatitis exists for the United States.
PATHOGENESIS
One theory for pathogenesis is that the disease is caused by an environmental trigger in a genetically
predisposed individual. The exact relationships between genes and the autoimmune process remain
largely undefined, but at the molecular level, they are thought to involve the autoantigen, the major
histocompatibility complex, and the T-cell receptor. (See "Autoimmune hepatitis: Pathogenesis".)
CLINICAL FEATURES
Physical findings range from a normal physical examination to findings suggestive of cirrhosis or liver
failure (eg, jaundice, ascites, splenomegaly). (See "Cirrhosis in adults: Etiologies, clinical
manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)
Asymptomatic patients may be identified when they undergo screening examinations, such as those
required for insurance, for employment, or prior to blood donation. In this setting, the finding of an
elevated aminotransferase level may be the only sign of liver disease. On occasion, the asymptomatic
patient is discovered when abdominal surgery is performed for some other reason and the surgeon
notes an abnormal, sometimes cirrhotic-appearing liver.
At the far end of the spectrum are those patients who present with acute liver failure, jaundice, and
coagulopathy, but such a presentation is generally uncommon [16-18]. (See "Acute liver failure in
adults: Etiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)
However, for some patients with acute liver failure of unknown etiology, autoimmune hepatitis is
determined to be the cause upon further review. In a study including 303 patients with acute liver
failure of unclear etiology, 34 patients (11 percent) were thought to have underlying autoimmune
hepatitis as the cause after a committee review which was guided by etiology-specific algorithms
[19].
In addition to asymptomatic disease and an acute presentation, some patients present with a range
of mild to severe, nonspecific symptoms, such as fatigue, anorexia, nausea, abdominal pain, and
itching. Arthralgia involving the small joints or a transient erythematous rash may also be present [6].
Celiac disease is a common extrahepatic condition, and prevalence varies from approximately 3 to 6
percent [26-28]. In a cohort study involving 460 patients with autoimmune hepatitis from the
Netherlands, the prevalence of celiac disease was approximately 10 times higher compared with the
general population (2.8 versus 0.35 percent) [28].
Skin conditions can occur at any time during the course of the disease. At initial presentation, rashes
are seen in 8 to 17 percent of patients and most commonly appear as a transient and nonspecific
maculopapular rash, particularly over the face, trunk, and upper arms [4,5]. Associated skin lesions
also include psoriasis [4], vitiligo [5,21], urticaria [29], acne [21], lichen planus [29], erythema nodosum
[5], and pyoderma gangrenosum [30,31].
Laboratory features
In patients with chronic symptoms or those with cirrhosis at initial presentation, AST and ALT
elevations are less profound, while the ratio of alkaline phosphatase to AST (or ALT) is lower and
approaches 1:2.
● Antinuclear antibodies – Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are the most common circulating
autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis, and may be the only autoantibody present. Titers
regarded as positive are dependent in part upon the methodology used and the age of the
patient. In most laboratories, titers in the range of 1:80 to 1:100 or greater are regarded as
positive in adults. (See "Measurement and clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies".)
● Anti-smooth muscle antibodies – Anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA) are more specific than
ANA for autoimmune hepatitis, particularly when present in titers of 1:80 or more in adults, but
less prevalent.
● Antiactin antibodies – Antiactin antibodies (AAA) are more specific than ANA for type 1
autoimmune hepatitis, but have not generally been measured in laboratories in North America.
ASMA titers of 1:320 or greater generally reflect the presence of AAA and can serve as a
surrogate marker for these antibodies.
AAA (IgG anti-F-actin) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are available
and, in some laboratories, have replaced ASMA in autoantibody profiles. They appear to be more
sensitive and specific than ASMA measured by immunofluorescence [34,35].
In one series, atypical p-ANCA was identified in 30 of 46 (65 percent) patients with type 1
autoimmune hepatitis as defined by ANA and/or ASMA at titers of 1:40 or greater [40].
● Anti-DNA antibodies – Antibodies to single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA, which are
most commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, can be found in patients with
autoimmune hepatitis types 1 and 2 [43]. The clinical significance of anti-DNA antibodies is
discussed separately. (See "Antibodies to double-stranded (ds)DNA, Sm, and U1 RNP".)
Most of the data on autoantibodies are based upon results obtained by immunofluorescence. By
contrast, commercial laboratories tend to measure autoantibodies by ELISA, and thus it is possible
that results may differ from those reported in the literature. For adults with suspected autoimmune
hepatitis, higher antibody titers (>1:160) provide greater support for the diagnosis compared with
lower titers.
Imaging — There are no characteristic imaging features for autoimmune hepatitis, and imaging
studies are not routinely obtained in all patients [49]. (See 'Diagnostic evaluation' below.)
● Bile duct changes (eg, destructive and nondestructive cholangitis, ductal injury, and ductular
reaction) are increasingly recognized in patients with autoimmune hepatitis [51]. In particular,
ductal injury and ductular reaction may be seen in over 80 percent of patients at the time of
diagnosis. Granulomas are uncommonly seen, but if present, should prompt an evaluation for
another diagnosis such as PBC or sarcoidosis.
● A plasma cell infiltrate, rosettes of hepatocytes, and multinucleated giant cells, may be seen
(picture 3). The presence of infiltrate in the portal areas and plasma cell infiltrates can help
distinguish such patients from those with other forms of acute hepatitis [52,53].
● Some degree of fibrosis is usually present in all but the mildest forms of autoimmune hepatitis.
Advanced fibrosis connects portal and central areas (bridging), which ultimately, by architectural
distortion of the hepatic lobule and the appearance of regenerating nodules, results in cirrhosis.
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
Autoimmune hepatitis is a diagnosis of exclusion, and for patients with suspected disease, we
proceed with testing in a stepwise fashion. This approach is largely consistent with guidelines issued
by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [2].
For adults with any serum aminotransferase elevation, we initially measure the following serum
globulins and serologic markers:
● Antinuclear antibody
● Antimitochondrial antibody
For adult patients who are negative for the conventional autoantibodies outlined above, we obtain
additional autoantibodies:
● Patients with a liver biochemical pattern that suggests cholestasis (predominantly elevated
alkaline phosphatase) (see "Approach to the patient with abnormal liver biochemical and
function tests", section on 'Patterns of liver test abnormalities').
Routine liver biopsy is not always necessary because the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis can be
strongly suspected based upon clinical features in patients with either a positive autoantibody and/or
elevated IgG or gamma globulin levels [54]. We prefer to obtain a liver biopsy in patients in whom
autoimmune hepatitis is suspected because histologic assessment can confirm the diagnosis and
help guide treatment. (See "Autoimmune hepatitis: Treatment".)
Histologic evaluation is particularly useful for evaluating patients who have few or atypical findings,
negative autoantibodies, and/or normal IgG levels. The decision to obtain a liver biopsy also involves
a discussion of the risks and benefits of biopsy and also depends on patient preferences. The risk of
adverse events related to liver biopsy is discussed separately. (See "Approach to liver biopsy", section
on 'Complications'.)
We use a standardized scoring system as part of the assessment. (See 'Histology' above and
'Diagnostic scoring systems' below.)
Of note, some guidelines require liver biopsy as part of the diagnostic evaluation, including 2015
guidelines from the European Association for the Study of the Liver [55].
DIAGNOSIS
Our diagnostic criteria — The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis can be made in a patient with a
compatible clinical presentation when the following features are present (see 'Patterns of clinical
presentation' above):
● A minimum of one elevated serum aminotransferase, typically (but not always) an aspartate
aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase level at least two times the upper limit of the
reference range.
● A minimum of one positive laboratory test: increased total IgG or gamma-globulin levels, and/or
serologic markers (antinuclear antibodies, antismooth muscle antibodies at a titer of at least
1:40, anti-liver/kidney microsomal-1 antibodies, anti-LC antibody-1, or anti-soluble liver/liver
pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) antibodies.
● Exclusion of diseases that have a similar presentation, particularly viral hepatitis, drug-induced
liver injury, and alcoholic liver disease (see 'Differential diagnosis' below)
When a liver biopsy is obtained, the diagnosis can be confirmed by histology showing interface
hepatitis and/or a predominantly lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. (See 'Histology' above and 'Diagnostic
evaluation' above.)
Disease classification — On the basis of the autoantibody profiles, patients can be categorized into
two disease subtypes: type 1 or type 2, but these subtypes have not been established as distinct
clinical or pathological entities (table 2) [2]. (See 'Autoantibodies' above.)
● Antiactin antibodies.
Diagnostic scoring systems — A scoring system developed to standardize the diagnosis for
population-based studies and clinical trials has had limited value in individual patients [1,57,58]. A
less complicated system using simplified criteria for individual patients is based upon titers of
autoantibodies, IgG levels, liver histology, and the exclusion of viral hepatitis.
● Autoantibodies – Assign one point if the ANA or ASMA are 1:40 OR assign two points if the ANA
or ASMA are ≥1:80 (OR if the LKM ≥1:40 OR if the SLA is positive).
● IgG – Assign one point if the IgG is >the upper limit of normal OR assign two points if the IgG is
>1.10 times the upper limit of normal.
● Liver histology (evidence of hepatitis is a mandatory condition) – Assign one point if the
histological features are compatible with autoimmune hepatitis OR two points if the histological
features are typical of autoimmune hepatitis. Typical histologic features were defined as the
presence of interface hepatitis, lymphocytic/lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the portal tracts
and extending into the lobule, emperipolesis (active penetration of one cell into and through a
large cell), and hepatic rosette formation. Compatible features were defined as a picture of
chronic hepatitis with lymphocytic infiltration without all the features considered typical.
● Absence of viral hepatitis – Assign two points if viral hepatitis has been excluded. In the
validation study, patients were mainly tested for hepatitis B and C. However, other forms of
hepatitis should be considered depending upon the clinical setting.
A probable diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis is made if the total points are 6, while a definite
diagnosis is made if the total points are ≥7.
In a validation study involving 11 international centers, the simplified scoring system had 88 percent
sensitivity and 97 percent specificity compared with a clinical and histologic reference standard when
using a cutoff of ≥6; the corresponding values were 81 and 99 percent, respectively, when using a
cutoff of ≥7 [58]. Sensitivity was somewhat lower, but specificity remained high in a later validation
study using a cutoff of ≥7 (70 and 100 percent, respectively) [59].
A potential limitation of the scoring system is the relative lack of standardization of some of the
autoantibody tests across testing facilities (ie, simplified criteria are based on autoantibodies
measured by immunofluorescence) [58]. Nevertheless, in the validation studies above, the local
standards for autoantibody testing at each center were used, suggesting that the model is relatively
robust to these differences.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
The differential diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis includes conditions associated with either acute
hepatitis or chronic inflammation that may accompanied by cirrhosis (table 2).
Other types of autoimmune liver disease — The distinction between autoimmune hepatitis and other
autoimmune liver diseases, including primary biliary cholangitis and overlap syndromes, is based
upon clinical, histologic, and immunologic features [60].
● Primary biliary cholangitis – The isolated presence of AMA with the M2 subtype usually signifies
primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and further diagnostic evaluation is needed. (See "Clinical
manifestations, diagnosis, and prognosis of primary biliary cholangitis (primary biliary cirrhosis)",
section on 'Diagnosis' and "Pathogenesis of primary biliary cholangitis (primary biliary cirrhosis)",
section on 'Antimitochondrial antibodies'.)
AMA is rarely the sole autoantibody in patients with autoimmune hepatitis [2,60]. However, some
patients with autoimmune hepatitis and a positive AMA will develop PBC [61]. Primary biliary
cholangitis may be indistinguishable from autoimmune hepatitis on liver biopsy, but often has
features involving bile duct paucity, inflammation and/or damage, or peri-ductular fibrosis that
are not seen in autoimmune hepatitis (picture 4A-C).
For example, patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis have characteristic multifocal
stricturing and dilation of intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts on cholangiogram, while
patients with autoimmune hepatitis have a normal-appearing biliary tree. The diagnosis of
overlap syndromes and primary sclerosing cholangitis is discussed in more detail separately.
(See "Autoimmune hepatitis variants: Definitions and treatment" and "Primary sclerosing
cholangitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
With older testing methods, a nonspecific antibody response seen in some patients with
autoimmune hepatitis made it difficult to distinguish between autoimmune disease and chronic
hepatitis C virus infection. A false positive hepatitis C antibody can easily be confirmed by
obtaining a hepatitis C virus RNA level in these patients. (See "Screening and diagnosis of
chronic hepatitis C virus infection".)
● Drug-induced liver injury – Some forms of drug-induced liver disease (DILI) can resemble
autoimmune hepatitis histologically, so a liver biopsy is often indicated when this diagnosis is
suspected as certain histologic features (eg, portal neutrophils, which are more common in DILI)
can help distinguish between the two [62]. The clinical presentation and diagnosis of DILI is
discussed separately. (See "Drug-induced liver injury".)
● Acute liver failure - Various autoantibodies (eg, AMA, anti-SLA/LP) have been described in
patients with acute liver failure [64,65]. Thus, autoantibodies alone in such patients does not
establish autoimmune hepatitis as the cause. The diagnostic evaluation of patients with acute
liver failure is discussed separately. (See "Acute liver failure in adults: Etiology, clinical
manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Diagnosis'.)
The initial treatment for autoimmune hepatitis typically includes a glucocorticoid, with or without
azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (table 3 and algorithm 1). Induction therapy, subsequent therapy
and prognosis are discussed in detail separately. (See "Autoimmune hepatitis: Treatment".)
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Children — The diagnostic evaluation for children with suspected autoimmune hepatitis is similar to
the evaluation in adults, although we obtain magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in all
children to exclude autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, antibody titers of 1:20 or greater
(for all antibodies) are regarded as positive in children.
For children with any serum aminotransferase abnormality, we initially measure the following
serologic markers:
● Antinuclear antibody.
● Antimitochondrial antibody.
For children who are negative for these autoantibodies, we obtain additional autoantibodies:
● Anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas antibody (commonly found in children with type 2
disease)
● Atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
In a study of 39 children and 14 adults with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, ALC-1 antibodies were
present more often in children compared with adults (59 versus 29 percent) [26]. In addition, ALC-1
antibodies were the sole autoantibody detected in 14 children (36 percent) with type 2 autoimmune
hepatitis.
Almost exclusively a disease of children, Wilson disease can present as a chronic hepatitis or as fatty
liver disease that resembles autoimmune hepatitis. Approximately 85 to 90 percent of patients with
Wilson disease have low serum ceruloplasmin levels (<20 mg/dL or 200 mg/L) which can distinguish
it from autoimmune hepatitis. (See "Wilson disease: Diagnostic tests" and "Wilson disease:
Epidemiology and pathogenesis".)
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around
the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Autoimmune hepatitis".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The
Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and
they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These
articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read
materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more
detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients
who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-
mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of
subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Autoimmune hepatitis (Beyond the Basics)")
● Autoimmune hepatitis has a heterogeneous and fluctuating nature, leading to marked variability
in its clinical manifestations. Its spectrum ranges from asymptomatic patients to those with
considerable and sometimes debilitating symptoms, and even to those with acute liver failure.
(See 'Patterns of clinical presentation' above.)
● Diagnosis is based upon characteristic serologic and histologic findings and exclusion of other
forms of chronic liver disease. It can often be strongly suspected based upon clinical and
laboratory features, and thus a liver biopsy is not always necessary in patients with typical
findings on noninvasive testing (see 'Diagnostic evaluation' above):
• For adults with compatible clinical or laboratory features, we obtain serum antinuclear
antibodies, anti-smooth muscle antibodies, antimitochondrial antibodies, anti-liver/kidney
microsomal-1 antibodies, and either an immunoglobulin G (IgG) or gamma globulin level. For
patients who are negative for these autoantibodies, we obtain anti-soluble liver antigen/liver
pancreas antibody, anti-actin antibodies, and atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic
antibodies.
• We prefer to obtain a liver biopsy in all patients in whom autoimmune hepatitis is suspected
because histologic assessment can confirm the diagnosis and help guide treatment.
Histologic evaluation is particularly useful as part of the diagnostic evaluation for patients
who have few or atypical findings, negative autoantibodies and/or normal IgG levels.
● The initial treatment for autoimmune hepatitis typically includes a glucocorticoid, with or without
azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (table 3 and algorithm 1). Induction therapy, subsequent
therapy, and prognosis are discussed in detail separately. (See "Autoimmune hepatitis:
Treatment".)
● The diagnostic evaluation for children with suspected autoimmune hepatitis is similar to the
evaluation in adults, although we obtain magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in all
children to exclude autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, antibody titers of 1:20 or
greater are regarded as positive in children. (See 'Children' above.)
1. Johnson PJ, McFarlane IG. Meeting report: International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group.
Hepatology 1993; 18:998.
2. Manns MP, Czaja AJ, Gorham JD, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis.
Hepatology 2010; 51:2193.
3. Boberg KM, Aadland E, Jahnsen J, et al. Incidence and prevalence of primary biliary cirrhosis,
primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis in a Norwegian population. Scand J
Gastroenterol 1998; 33:99.
4. Werner M, Prytz H, Ohlsson B, et al. Epidemiology and the initial presentation of autoimmune
hepatitis in Sweden: a nationwide study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43:1232.
5. Al-Chalabi T, Boccato S, Portmann BC, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in the elderly: a
systematic retrospective analysis of a large group of consecutive patients with definite AIH
followed at a tertiary referral centre. J Hepatol 2006; 45:575.
. Heneghan MA, Yeoman AD, Verma S, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis. Lancet 2013; 382:1433.
7. Czaja AJ, Donaldson PT. Gender effects and synergisms with histocompatibility leukocyte
antigens in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:2051.
. Ngu JH, Bechly K, Chapman BA, et al. Population-based epidemiology study of autoimmune
hepatitis: a disease of older women? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25:1681.
9. Lee YM, Teo EK, Ng TM, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis in Singapore: a rare syndrome affecting
middle-aged women. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16:1384.
10. Delgado JS, Vodonos A, Malnick S, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis in southern Israel: a 15-year
multicenter study. J Dig Dis 2013; 14:611.
11. Primo J, Maroto N, Martínez M, et al. Incidence of adult form of autoimmune hepatitis in
Valencia (Spain). Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2009; 72:402.
15. Muratori P, Granito A, Quarneti C, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis in Italy: the Bologna experience. J
Hepatol 2009; 50:1210.
1 . Kessler WR, Cummings OW, Eckert G, et al. Fulminant hepatic failure as the initial presentation
of acute autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:625.
17. Bower WA, Johns M, Margolis HS, et al. Population-based surveillance for acute liver failure. Am
J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:2459.
1 . Anand L, Choudhury A, Bihari C, et al. Flare of Autoimmune Hepatitis Causing Acute on Chronic
Liver Failure: Diagnosis and Response to Corticosteroid Therapy. Hepatology 2019; 70:587.
19. Ganger DR, Rule J, Rakela J, et al. Acute Liver Failure of Indeterminate Etiology: A
Comprehensive Systematic Approach by An Expert Committee to Establish Causality. Am J
Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1319.
20. Bittencourt PL, Farias AQ, Porta G, et al. Frequency of concurrent autoimmune disorders in
patients with autoimmune hepatitis: effect of age, gender, and genetic background. J Clin
Gastroenterol 2008; 42:300.
21. Teufel A, Weinmann A, Kahaly GJ, et al. Concurrent autoimmune diseases in patients with
autoimmune hepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44:208.
22. Abdo A, Meddings J, Swain M. Liver abnormalities in celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2004; 2:107.
23. Caprai S, Vajro P, Ventura A, et al. Autoimmune liver disease associated with celiac disease in
childhood: a multicenter study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6:803.
24. Rubio-Tapia A, Abdulkarim AS, Wiesner RH, et al. Celiac disease autoantibodies in severe
autoimmune liver disease and the effect of liver transplantation. Liver Int 2008; 28:467.
25. de Boer YS, Gerussi A, van den Brand FF, et al. Association Between Black Race and
Presentation and Liver-Related Outcomes of Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1616.
2 . Villalta D, Girolami E, Alessio MG, et al. Autoantibody Profiling in a Cohort of Pediatric and Adult
Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis. J Clin Lab Anal 2016; 30:41.
27. Mirzaagha F, Azali SH, Islami F, et al. Coeliac disease in autoimmune liver disease: a cross-
sectional study and a systematic review. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42:620.
2 . van Gerven NM, Bakker SF, de Boer YS, et al. Seroprevalence of celiac disease in patients with
autoimmune hepatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26:1104.
29. Golding PL, Smith M, Williams R. Multisystem involvement in chronic liver disease. Studies on
the incidence and pathogenesis. Am J Med 1973; 55:772.
30. Wat H, Haber RM. Trends in the Association between Pyoderma Gangrenosum and
Autoimmune Hepatitis: Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Cutan Med Surg 2014;
18:345.
31. Halac U, Al Dhaybi R, Powell J, et al. Unusual association between autoimmune hepatitis and
severe pyoderma gangrenosum. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 50:219.
32. Al-Chalabi T, Underhill JA, Portmann BC, et al. Effects of serum aspartate aminotransferase
levels in patients with autoimmune hepatitis influence disease course and outcome. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6:1389.
33. Manns MP, Lohse AW, Vergani D. Autoimmune hepatitis--Update 2015. J Hepatol 2015; 62:S100.
34. Frenzel C, Herkel J, Lüth S, et al. Evaluation of F-actin ELISA for the diagnosis of autoimmune
hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:2731.
35. Granito A, Muratori L, Muratori P, et al. Antibodies to filamentous actin (F-actin) in type 1
autoimmune hepatitis. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59:280.
3 . Wächter B, Kyriatsoulis A, Lohse AW, et al. Characterization of liver cytokeratin as a major target
antigen of anti-SLA antibodies. J Hepatol 1990; 11:232.
37. Kanzler S, Weidemann C, Gerken G, et al. Clinical significance of autoantibodies to soluble liver
antigen in autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 1999; 31:635.
3 . Wies I, Brunner S, Henninger J, et al. Identification of target antigen for SLA/LP autoantibodies
in autoimmune hepatitis. Lancet 2000; 355:1510.
39. Kernebeck T, Lohse AW, Grötzinger J. A bioinformatical approach suggests the function of the
autoimmune hepatitis target antigen soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas. Hepatology 2001;
34:230.
40. Zauli D, Ghetti S, Grassi A, et al. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in type 1 and 2
autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 1997; 25:1105.
41. Targan SR, Landers C, Vidrich A, Czaja AJ. High-titer antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in
type-1 autoimmune hepatitis. Gastroenterology 1995; 108:1159.
42. Terjung B, Spengler U, Sauerbruch T, Worman HJ. "Atypical p-ANCA" in IBD and hepatobiliary
disorders react with a 50-kilodalton nuclear envelope protein of neutrophils and myeloid cell
lines. Gastroenterology 2000; 119:310.
43. Czaja AJ, Morshed SA, Parveen S, Nishioka M. Antibodies to single-stranded and double-
stranded DNA in antinuclear antibody-positive type 1-autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 1997;
26:567.
44. Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Reid F, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis in childhood: a 20-year experience.
Hepatology 1997; 25:541.
45. Homberg JC, Abuaf N, Bernard O, et al. Chronic active hepatitis associated with antiliver/kidney
microsome antibody type 1: a second type of "autoimmune" hepatitis. Hepatology 1987; 7:1333.
47. Bridoux-Henno L, Maggiore G, Johanet C, et al. Features and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis
type 2 presenting with isolated positivity for anti-liver cytosol antibody. Clin Gastroenterol
Hepatol 2004; 2:825.
49. Lewin M, Vilgrain V, Ozenne V, et al. Prevalence of sclerosing cholangitis in adults with
autoimmune hepatitis: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and histological study.
Hepatology 2009; 50:528.
51. Verdonk RC, Lozano MF, van den Berg AP, Gouw AS. Bile ductal injury and ductular reaction are
frequent phenomena with different significance in autoimmune hepatitis. Liver Int 2016;
36:1362.
52. Abe M, Onji M, Kawai-Ninomiya K, et al. Clinicopathologic features of the severe form of acute
type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:255.
53. Stravitz RT, Lefkowitch JH, Fontana RJ, et al. Autoimmune acute liver failure: proposed clinical
and histological criteria. Hepatology 2011; 53:517.
54. Björnsson E, Talwalkar J, Treeprasertsuk S, et al. Patients with typical laboratory features of
autoimmune hepatitis rarely need a liver biopsy for diagnosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;
9:57.
55. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune
hepatitis. J Hepatol 2015; 63:971.
5 . Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA, Manns MP. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, P450IID6, and
mitochondrial complexes in chronic hepatitis. Gastroenterology 1993; 105:1522.
57. Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, et al. International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of
criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 1999; 31:929.
5 . Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ, et al. Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune
hepatitis. Hepatology 2008; 48:169.
59. Yeoman AD, Westbrook RH, Al-Chalabi T, et al. Diagnostic value and utility of the simplified
International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) criteria in acute and chronic liver disease.
Hepatology 2009; 50:538.
0. Rust C, Beuers U. Overlap syndromes among autoimmune liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol
2008; 14:3368.
1. Dinani AM, Fischer SE, Mosko J, et al. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis who have
antimitochondrial antibodies need long-term follow-up to detect late development of primary
biliary cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:682.
2. Suzuki A, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, et al. The use of liver biopsy evaluation in discrimination of
idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis versus drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology 2011; 54:931.
4. Leung PS, Rossaro L, Davis PA, et al. Antimitochondrial antibodies in acute liver failure:
implications for primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46:1436.
5. Bernal W, Ma Y, Smith HM, et al. The significance of autoantibodies and immunoglobulins in
acute liver failure: a cohort study. J Hepatol 2007; 47:664.
Sarcoidosis <1
Asthma 1 to 4
Pernicious anemia 1
Antiphospholipid syndrome 1
Glomerulonephritis 1
Cryoglobulinemia <1
Uveitis <1
Diabetes (type 1) 1 to 10
Sjögren's syndrome 1 to 7
Polymyositis <1
Dermatomyositis <1
Vitiligo 1 to 2
Acne <1
Urticaria <1
AIH: autoimmune hepatitis; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; CREST: calcinosis cutis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility,
sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia.
Graphic 59606 Version 2.0
Polyclonal gammopathy
(A) Densitometer tracing of these findings reveals a broad-based peak of gamma mobility.
This pattern is most often due to the presence of an inflammatory or reactive process, such
as chronic liver disease, connective tissue disease, chronic infection, or a
lymphoproliferative disorder.
(B) A polyclonal pattern is seen on serum protein electrophoresis on agarose gel (anode on
left). The band at the right (red asterisk) is broad, and extends throughout the gamma
mobility area.
Reproduced with permission from: Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Plasma cell disorders. In: Cecil textbook of
medicine, 22nd ed, Goldman L, Ausiello DA (Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2004. p.1184. Copyright
© 2004 Elsevier.
Antismooth muscle antibody (ASMA) Type 1 ASMA titers of 1:320 or greater generally
reflect the presence of AAA
Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) Type 1 More specific for primary biliary cholangitis
Anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas Type 1 and type 2 More common in children with type 2
antibodies (anti-SLA/LP) disease
Anti-DNA antibodies (single stranded DNA Type 1 and type 2 Anti-dsDNA antibody is commonly
[ssDNA] and double-stranded DNA [dsDNA]) associated with systemic lupus
erythematosus
Anti-liver cytosol-1 antibody (ALC-1) Type 2 May occur in conjunction with ALKM-1
Liver biopsy in autoimmune hepatitis showing portal and periportal mononuclear cell
infiltration.
The portal tract is expanded by a mononuclear infiltrate; the limiting plate is disrupted; and
the inflammatory process extends into the acinus. Staining by hematoxylin-eosin; original
magnification x 200.
Reproduced with permission from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Hepatology 2002; 36:479.
Plasma cells are identified by their eccentric, clock-face nucleus and pale perinuclear
cytoplasmic crescent. They are characteristic of autoimmune hepatitis, but neither
pathognomonic of the disease or required for its diagnosis. Staining by hematoxylin-eosin;
original magnification x 400.
Reproduced with permission from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Hepatology 2002; 36:479.
Low power view of liver biopsy in primary biliary cholangitis. A damaged bile duct (BD) is
visible in the center of an intense inflammatory cell reaction in an enlarged portal triad. The
bile duct appears to be the target of this inflammatory reaction.
High power view of liver biopsy in primary biliary cholangitis in the same patient showing a
marked mononuclear cell infiltrate surrounding and destroying a bile duct.
Combination¶
Prednisone only*¶, mg/day
Prednisone*, mg/day Azathioprine Δ, mg/day
Week 1 60 30 50
Week 2 40 20 50
Week 3 30 15 50
Week 4 30 15 50
Malignancy Obesity
Emotional lability
Hypertension
* Orally administered prednisolone can be used in place of prednisone at the same doses. For patients with mild disease (eg, asymptomatic
patients with aminotransferase levels <10 times the upper limit of normal), lower dose prednisone monotherapy (20 mg per day) is an
alternative.
¶ For patients on prednisone monotherapy for induction, the initial prednisone dose is typically 40 to 60 mg daily. In patients at increased risk of
side effects from glucocorticoids, a lower dose of prednisone monotherapy (eg, 30 mg daily) or combination therapy may be preferable to
prednisone monotherapy.
Δ TPMT phenotyping should be obtained before initiating azathioprine. In Europe, an azathioprine dose of 1 to 2 mg/kg/day is often used.
◊ Prednisone may be further tapered to an individual dose that maintains remission. A 10 mg/day maintenance dose may be achieved by
tapering the dose by 5 mg every week. A maintenance dose of 5 mg/day may be considered; in that case, the dose is tapered by 2.5 mg every
week. The maintenance prednisone regimen is continued until resolution of the disease, treatment failure, or drug-intolerance.
§ Prednisone may be further tapered to an individual dose that maintains remission by increments of 2.5 mg/day each week down to a dose of 5
mg/day. Dose adjustment recommendations for maintenance with either azathioprine or glucocorticoids alone are provided in the topic and
accompanying algorithm.
Reference:
1. Manns MP, Czaja AJ, Gorham JD, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2010; 51:2193.
* Refer to the topic on the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis for additional discussion of the indications for treatment and for details on the
treatment of special populations including patients with fulminant hepatitis, children, women who are pregnant, patients with cirrhosis,
patients with hepatitis C virus, and patients with variants of autoimmune hepatitis.
¶ Asymptomatic patient with aminotransferase levels <10 times the upper limit of normal.
Δ Refer to topic on the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis for detailed instruction on drug administration. Oral prednisolone is an alternative to
prednisone. Budesonide may also be an alternative to prednisone, particularly for patients at increased risk for glucocorticoid side effects.
Oral mercaptopurine is an alternative to azathioprine.
◊ Eg, brittle diabetes, osteoporosis, emotional lability, history of psychosis, poorly controlled hypertension.
§ In Europe, initial therapy is often with prednisone/prednisolone and oral azathioprine. If this treatment is chosen, go to Box A.
¥ Refer to the UpToDate topic on the treatment of patients with autoimmune hepatitis for details.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to
UpToDate standards of evidence.