Hoke 2000
Hoke 2000
Hoke 2000
The popularity of packed-column supercritical fluid, sub- (R,S)-2-(3-Benzoylphenyl)propionic acid (ketoprofen, kt; Figure
critical fluid, and enhanced fluidity liquid chromatogra- 1), is a potent nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug that is com-
phies (pcSFC) for enantiomeric separations has increased monly formulated as a tablet for oral administration or, in some
steadily over the past few years. The addition of a countries, as a topical gel or cream. In both cases, the active is
significant amount (typically 20-95%) of a viscosity formulated as a racemic mixture. It is well known that the (S)
lowering agent, such as carbon dioxide, to the mobile form of kt contains the intrinsic pharmacologic activity,1 and for
phase provides a number of advantages for chiral separa- this reason, it is desirable to determine the plasma concentrations
tions. For example, higher mobile-phase flow rates can of the individual enantiomers. The estimated bioavailability of
often be attained without a concomitant loss in chromato- orally dosed ketoprofen is g92%,2 and the maximum plasma
graphic efficiency since diffusion coefficients, and opti- concentrations reach low-microgram per milliliter levels after a
mum velocities, are typically higher in pcSFC. Ultratrace typical 25-mg dose.2,3 With peak concentrations in that range, LC
enantioselective quantitation of drugs in biomatrixes is with UV detection has been established to provide adequate
an ideal application for these chromatographic attributes. sensitivity for obtaining full pharmacokinetic (PK) curves.4-10
To demonstrate the utility of this approach, a pcSFC
Typical chiral LC-UV methods reported in the literature have
tandem mass spectrometry (pcSFC-MS/MS) method was
analysis times of approximately 10-25 min and lower limits of
compared to a LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of the
quantitation (LLOQ) of 25 ng/mL. Other approaches for bioana-
(R)- and (S)-enantiomers of ketoprofen (kt), a potent
lytical determination of ketoprofen are GC/MS based with
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug, in human plasma.
reported 10-20-min analysis times.11-15 One of these methods14
After preparation using automated solid-phase extraction
in the 96-well format, kt enantiomers were separated on
(1) Hutt, A. J.; Caldwell, J. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1984, 9, 371-373.
a Chirex 3005 analytical column using isocratic condi- (2) Jamali, F.; Brocks, D. R. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1990, 19, 197-217.
tions. Validation data and study sample data from patients (3) Foster, R. T.; Jamali, F.; Russell, A. S.; Alballa, S. R. J. Pharm. Sci. 1988,
dosed with either orally or topically administered keto- 77, 70-73.
(4) Carr, R. A.; Caille, G.; Ngoc, A. H.; Foster, R. T. J. Chromatogr., B: Biomed.
profen were generated using both pcSFC and LC as the Sci. Appl. 1995, 668, 175-181.
chromatographic methods to compare and contrast these (5) Lovlin, R.; Vakily, M.; Jamali, F. J. Chromatogr., B: Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1996,
analytical approaches. Generally, most analytical at- 679, 196-198.
(6) Grubb, N. G.; Rudy, D. W.; Hall, S. D. J. Chromatogr., B: Biomed. Sci. Appl.
tributes, including specificity, linearity, sensitivity, ac- 1996, 678, 237-244.
curacy, precision, and ruggedness, for both of these (7) Boisvert, J.; Caille, G.; McGilveray, I. J.; Qureshi, S. A. J. Chromatogr., B:
methods were comparable with the exception that the Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1997, 690, 189-193.
(8) Yagi, M.; Shibukawa, A.; Nakagawa, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990, 38, 2513-
pcSFC separation provided a roughly 3-fold reduction in 2517.
analysis time. A 2.3-min pcSFC separation and a 6.5-min (9) Wanwimolruk, S.; Wanwimolruk, S. Z.; Zoest, A. R. J. Liq. Chromatogr.
LC separation provided equivalent, near-baseline-resolved 1991, 14, 3685-3694.
(10) Rifai, N.; Lafi, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Law, T. Ther. Drug Monit. 1997, 19,
peaks, demonstrating a significant time savings for analy- 175-178.
sis of large batch pharmacokinetic samples using pcSFC. (11) Leis, H. J.; Leis, M.; Windischhofer, W. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 486-
492.
(12) Alkatheeri, N. A.; Wasfi, I. A.; Lambert, M. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999,
* Corresponding author: (e-mail:) hoke.sh@pg.com.) 22, 127-135.
† Health Care Research Center.
(13) Gonzalez, G.; Ventura, R.; Smith, A. K.; de la Torre, R.; Segura, J. J.
‡ Miami Valley Laboratories.
Chromatogr., A 1996, 719, 251-264.
10.1021/ac000068x CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 72, No. 17, September 1, 2000 4235
Published on Web 07/22/2000
meric separations has increased steadily over the past few
years.21-26 While these three techniques are different, they are
closely related and require the same instrumentation. All three
will be referred to as “pcSFC” in this report. The addition of a
significant amount, typically 20-95%, of a viscosity lowering agent,
such as carbon dioxide, to the mobile phase provides a number
of advantages for chiral separations.27,28 Lower viscosity allows the
use of higher mobile-phase flow rates (i.e., faster analyses) and/
or longer columns (i.e., higher efficiencies29) than when traditional
liquid mobile phases are used. Compared to liquid chromatogra-
phy, these higher mobile-phase flow rates can often be attained
without a concomitant loss in chromatographic efficiency since
diffusion coefficients, and optimum velocities, are typically higher
with pcSFC. While CO2 itself is relatively nonpolar, mixtures of
CO2 and polar organic solvents retain the polarity and solvating
power of the polar organic until significant levels (40-60%) of CO2
are added.30 These mixtures can often, though not universally,
be used to replace existing chiral LC mobile phases, without loss
of the chiral recognition mechanism of the analyte. However, each
separation must be tested on an individual basis.31
Although rarely performed, the ultratrace quantitation of drugs
Figure 1. Full-scan product ion spectra of (A) ketoprofen and (B)
in biological fluids is an ideal application of this separation
SIL ketoprofen. The asterisk denotes the chiral center.
technique when coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detec-
tion. Previous reports have described the development and survey
is stereoselective but requires derivatization and has a LLOQ of application of the pneumatically assisted electrospray source for
1 ng/mL for each enantiomer. pcSFC-MS/MS that was used in the present study.32,33 Here, a
Because the circulating levels of kt after topical administration thorough assessment of the “real world” utility of the pcSFC-
are much lower than those observed following an oral dose, the MS/MS technique for high-throughput bioanalytical quantitation
sensitivity of the methodologies listed above is not adequate to of drugs is provided, using enantiospecific quantitation of keto-
define PK curves following a topical dose. For this reason, a profen as an example. This is accomplished by validation and
method was developed to lower the limit of quantitation using application of a pcSFC-MS/MS method for quantitation of the
liquid chromatography coupled with tandem quadrupole mass (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of ketoprofen in human plasma and
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).16 The resulting method has a LLOQ comparison of the results of this method to results generated with
of 50 pg/mL per enantiomer and relatively short analysis time of an earlier LC-MS/MS method.
6.5 min/sample. In addition, automation of the sample preparation
was performed using robotic solid-phase extraction (SPE) in the EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
96-well plate format, which allowed the processing of a 96-well Chemicals and Reagents. (R,S)-Ketoprofen was purchased
plate every 50 min. Though the LC-MS/MS methodology was from the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (Rockville, MD)
quite reliable, accurate, and precise, it possessed the drawback while the internal standard, [13C1,2H3]-(R,S)-ketoprofen (SIL kt)
that the separation still required a 6.5-min analysis time to yield was synthesized at P&G Pharmaceuticals (Norwich, NY). Blank
adequate resolution of the enantiomers. While that throughput human plasma was obtained from volunteers at Procter & Gamble
represented an advance over existing methodologies, it was still (Mason, OH) or from Golden West Biologicals (Temecula, CA).
much slower than analysis times typically used for racemic
(21) Phinney, K. W.; Sander, L. C.; Wise, S. A. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2331-
bioanalytical quantitation which range from a few minutes to less 2335.
than 1 min/analysis.17-20 (22) Maftouh, M. Spectra Anal. 1997, 26, 25-28.
The popularity of packed-column supercritical fluid, subcritical (23) Smith, R. In Supercritical Fluid Chromatography with Packed Columns,
Techniques and Applications; Anton, K., Berger, C., Eds.; Chromatography
fluid, and enhanced fluidity liquid chromatographies for enantio- Science Series 75; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998; pp 223-249.
(24) Sun, Q.; Olesik, S. V. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2139-2145.
(14) Jack, D. S.; Rumble, R. H.; Davies, N. W.; Francis, H. W. J. Chromatogr., B: (25) Terfloth, G. LC-GC 1999, 17, 400-405.
Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1992, 584, 189-197. (26) Wolf, C.; Pirkle, W. H. LC-GC 1997, 15, 352-363.
(15) DeJong, E. G.; Kiffers, J.; Maes, R. A. A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1989, 7, (27) Anton, K., Berger, C., Eds. Supercritical Fluid Chromatography with Packed
1617-1622. Columns, Techniques and Applications; Chromatography Science Series 75;
(16) Eichhold, T. H.; Bailey, R. E.; Tanguay, S. L.; Hoke, II, S. H. J. Mass Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998.
Spectrom. 2000, 35, 504-511. (28) Berger, T. Packed Column SFC, RSC Chromatography Monographs; The
(17) Janiszewski, J.; Schneider, R. P.; Hoffmaster, K.; Swyden, M.; Wells, D.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1995.
Fouda, H. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 11, 1033-1037. (29) Berger, T. A.; Wilson, W. H. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1451-1455.
(18) Davies, I. D.; Allanson, J. P.; Causon, R. C. J. Chromatogr., B: Biomed. Sci. (30) Yuan, H.; Olesik, S. V. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 1595-1603.
Appl. 1999, 732, 173-184. (31) Bargmann-Leyder, N.; Tambute, A.; Caude, M. Chirality 1995, 7, 311-
(19) Joyce, K. B.; Jones, A. E.; Scott, R. J.; Biddlecombe, R. A.; Pleasance, S. 325.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 1899-1910. (32) Pinkston, J. D.; Baker, T. R. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 9, 1087-
(20) Zweigenbaum, J.; Heinig, K.; Steinborner, S.; Wachs, T.; Henion, J. Anal. 1094.
Chem. 1999, 71, 2294-2300. (33) Baker, T. R.; Pinkston, J. D. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 498-509.
Figure 3. Chromatographic profiles of plasma blanks and 50 pg/ a batch building error.
mL spiked plasma calibration standards generated using (A) LC-
MS/MS and (B) pcSFC-MS/MS for the determination of (R)- and (S)-
kt.
Sensitivity. The sensitivity of both methodologies was evalu-
was necessary to dilute the higher calibration standards, QCs, ated by spiking known amounts of kt into blank plasma. Figure 3
and study samples. This large dynamic range enabled the shows the plasma blanks generated using both methodologies
generation of PK curves from both topical and oral samples in a and the LLOQ plasma spike of 50 pg/mL. That level corresponds
single batch. Using single-batch analysis minimized any analytical to ∼10 pg on column for each enantiomer. Similar signal-to-noise
bias that might have been introduced by using one method for ratios are observed for both separation methodologies despite the
the oral PK samples and a separate method for the topical PK fact the pcSFC chromatograms were generated using a 4.0-mm
samples. column versus the 2.0-mm column used with the LC separation.
Though a single, 1/x2 weighted calibration curve covering the The average recoveries for the 50 pg/mL (R)- and (S)-kt calibra-
entire calibration range provided acceptable linearity, accuracy tion standards using the LC method were 98.0 (2.2) and 94.8%
was improved by segmenting the calibration curve into a low and (7.8%), respectively, with relative standard deviations (RSDs)
a high portion. For the LC data, one curve for each analyte was displayed in parentheses. For the pcSFC method, the recoveries
constructed using calibration standards from 0.05 to 100 ng/mL, of the 50 pg/mL calibration standards were 98.8 (3.6) and 103.2%
while the second segment ranged from 100 to 2500 ng/mL. All (5.8%) for (R)- and (S)-kt, respectively.
curves used 1/x2 linear regression. Typically, recoveries of the Precision and Accuracy. Precision and accuracy were evalu-
calibration standards were within (15% of theoretical. For the ated by spiking known amounts of kt into blank human plasma
calibration curves used in this comparison, the range of correlation at four levels throughout the quantitative range of the methodol-
coefficients for the lower portions of the curves extended from ogy. Table 1 displays the results for kt recovery using the LC-
0.9942 to 0.9991 while the correlation coefficients for the upper MS/MS methodology and Table 2 displays the results using the
portions of the curves ranged from 0.9968 to 0.9997. For the pcSFC pcSFC-MS/MS methodology. For the LC methodology, the
calibration, one curve was constructed using calibration standards average accuracy ranged from 98.7 to 102.9%, with variability
from 0.05 to 2.5 ng/mL, while the second curve ranged from 2.5 (RSD) ranging from 4.5 to 7.6%. For the pcSFC methodology, the
ng/mL to 2500 ng/mL; all pcSFC curves were also weighted with average accuracy ranged from 98.6 to 105.7%, with variability
1/x2 and recoveries of standards were typically within (15% of ranging from 3.4 to 7.2%. Generally, similar results for accuracy
theoretical. The range of correlation coefficients for the lower and precision of spiked plasma samples were obtained using both
portions of the curves used in these studies ranged from 0.9952 modes of separation.
to 0.9991, while the correlation coefficients for upper curves Ruggedness. The ruggedness of both methods was evaluated
ranged from 0.9981 to 0.9996. For both methods, correlation by analyzing batches of bioanalytical samples and noting problems
coefficients for linear regression typically exceeded 0.995, with that occurred using normal method conditions. Both methods
intercepts near zero. were capable of analyzing batches containing a minimum of 150-
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 72, No. 17, September 1, 2000 4239
Figure 5. Plots of (A) (R)-kt and (B) (S)-kt plasma levels versus
time after topical and oral administration of kt and comparing the LC
and pcSFC quantitative results.
Figure 4. Comparison of (A) LC and (B) pcSFC for analysis of a
PK study sample collected at 2.5 h after topical administration of
Oruvail gel. Approximately 100 pg/mL of each enantiomer was present
in this sample. The major difference is that the pcSFC separation Pharmacokinetic Study. Representative PK samples col-
can be performed in about one-third the time that it takes to perform lected after topical and oral administration of kt were prepared
the LC analysis. and analyzed by both modes of chromatographic separation to
further investigate the utility of the pcSFC approach and to
compare the pcSFC quantitative results with LC results for actual
200 samples prior to noting a slight loss of chromatographic
study samples. Chromatograms comparing the LC and pcSFC
resolution or occasionally a slight increase in back pressure. In
analysis of a plasma sample collected 2.5 h after topical admin-
all cases, the original chromatographic performance was recovered istration are shown in Figure 4. The signal-to-noise ratios of both
by simply replacing the guard column. With the very minimal the (R)- and (S)-kt peaks are very similar for both the LC and
problems observed with either method and the easy restoration pcSFC analysis of this sample containing ∼100 pg/mL of each
of performance by replacing the guard column, the overall enantiomer. These chromatograms again illustrate the dramatic
ruggedness of both techniques is acceptable for bioanalytical decrease in analysis time that can be achieved when pcSFC is
analyses. used for chiral bioanalytical analyses. Slightly better resolution
Sample Throughput. The sample throughput of the LC-MS/ was also exhibited with the pcSFC methodology.
MS methodology is much greater than that of the typical LC- The PK plots for (R)-kt and (S)-kt comparing the LC and pcSFC
UV methods reported in the literature4-10 (10-25 min/sample) quantitative results and showing the plasma levels of (R)- and (S)-
largely due to the enhanced specificity of the tandem mass kt measured after topical and oral administration are provided in
spectrometric detection. This specificity allowed analysis times Figure 5A and B, respectively. Excellent correlation of the results
to be reduced to 6.5 min from injection to injection. The use of from both methods was achieved. The deviation of each pcSFC
the pcSFC separation improved the injection-to-injection cycle time result from the corresponding LC result was calculated. For (R)-
to 2.3 min/samplesa factor of ∼3 times better than the LC-MS/ kt, the average of the absolute percent deviations was 3.8% with
MS separation and up to 10-fold better than the LC-UV methods. a maximum deviation of 10.9%. The average of the absolute
With the faster flow rates available using the 10-mL pump heads, deviations of the pcSFC values from the LC values for (S)-kt was
another 2-fold reduction of the analysis time is possible. That 2.5% with a maximum deviation of 11.9%.
results in a total 6-fold throughput improvement versus the LC- From a PK viewpoint, the topical kt levels were below the
MS/MS approach, even when using the larger 4.0-mm diameter LLOQ until the 2.5-h time point and then continued to increase
column versus the 2.0-mm column used with the LC-MS/MS throughout the entire sampling period. The oral dose yielded a
work. Of course, the throughput of all these methods could be maximum concentration at ∼2.5 h, nearly 4 orders of magnitude
increased even further by using other approaches such as column higher than its respective topical plasma concentration. Interest-
switching. ingly, the plasma concentrations from oral and topical administra-
4240 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 72, No. 17, September 1, 2000
tion were nearly identical for the 16-h time point. The levels of MS/MS approach for most bioanalytical attributes, but has the
(R)-kt compared to (S)-kt show slight differences throughout the advantage of a 3-fold, and if faster flow rates are used, up to 6-fold,
24-h time course for topical samples;16 however, there are clearly higher sample throughput. This increase in throughput for the
higher levels of (S)-kt relative to (R)-kt by the end of the 24-h instrumental portion of the assay is important for the effective
period following the oral dose. These findings agree with previous utilization of capital intensive mass spectrometry instrumentation.
reports.2,3 To further increase pcSFC bioanalytical throughput for pharma-
ceutical analyses, the use of other techniques such as column
CONCLUSIONS switching could be employed. It may also be possible to use the
A pcSFC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for pcSFC-MS/MS approach for nonchiral bioanalytical analyses
quantitation of kt in human plasma from 0.05 to 2500 ng/mL; this
either with or without column switching so that the analysis times
method was shown to be valuable for measuring kt concentrations
of those gradient or isocratic separations could also be reduced.
in human plasma following oral and topical administration. The
pcSFC-MS/MS methodology for the chiral determination of kt
was found to be comparable to the LC-MS/MS approach in terms ACKNOWLEDGMENT
of specificity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and rug- The authors thank Ramona Quintanilla for the synthesis of the
gedness, but had an advantage of a total analysis time of ∼1/3 of stable-labeled internal standards used for these studies.
the time for the LC-MS/MS methodology at 2.3 min/sample. It
is ∼10-fold faster than LC-UV methods and has an LLOQ of 500-
fold lower than UV methods for the determination of kt in plasma. Received for review January 24, 2000. Accepted June 2,
The application of pcSFC separation coupled with tandem mass 2000.
spectrometric detection is comparable to the widely used LC- AC000068X