2 Tina Mukherjee
2 Tina Mukherjee
2 Tina Mukherjee
ISSN (Online): 2454289X, ISSN (Print): 22498400
Copyright © 2019 IJAM, Chennai, India Volume 22 Number 1
April - June 2019, pp. 10-19
Abstract: The use of freely suspended microbial cells for dye removal is limited owing to their
inherent disadvantages such as clogging of cells, low mechanical strength of the biomass etc.
Immobilized cells offer advantages over dispersed cells such as high cell density, strong
endurance of toxicity for being high in numbers, lower operating costs, simple maintenance
management and production of smaller residual sludge. In this study immobilized cell mass of a
bacterial consortium, isolated from dye contaminated wastewater, was used to decolorize a
mixture of triphenylmethane dyes: Malachite Green, Crystal violet and Basic Fuchsin. Among all
the matrices studied calcium alginate showed maximum decolorization with immobilized
biomass. Therefore, cells immobilized on calcium alginate matrix was considered for studying the
removal of triphenylmethane dyes. Effects of various parameters viz. alginate concentration, bead
size, bacterial cell numbers, initial dye concentration, time, pH and temperature were investigated
in batch system. The optimum conditions for removal of the dyes were found to be pH 8,
temperature 37°C, alginate concentration of 2% (w/v), a cell concentration of 1×109 cells/ml. The
dye removal capacity of the immobilized cells decreased as the initial dye concentration
increased.
Keywords: Triphenylmethane dyes, immobilization, decolorization
Introduction
Triphenylmethane dyes are used extensively in the textile industries for dyeing of nylon,
polyacrylon nitrile, modified nylon, wool, silk and cotton [1]. Some of the triphenylmethane dyes
are used in medicine and forensics as biological stains. Gasoline, paper and leather industries are
the major consumer of triphenylmethane dyes. Triphenylmethane dyes are also one of the widely
used dermatological agents [2]. Gentian Violet and Malachite Green have been used in topical
application on domestic animals against various infections. These have been used effectively for
controlling the fungal growth under varying conditions [3]. Gentian Violet has also been applied
to poultry feed for controlling fungal contamination. Hence, human population gets directly or
indirectly exposed to the dyes through their widespread therapeutic and commercial use.
However, studies confirmed the cytogenetic toxic nature of Gentian violet, which states that that
this compound is a mitotic poison as well as a clastogen in vitro [2]. Its clastogenic properties
were confirmed in five other different mammalian cell types. Gentian Violet has been regarded as
biohazardous substance [3]. Most of the triphenylmethane dyes are animal carcinogens [4]. There
are many instances in which researchers have found their acute toxicity against fishes and
mammals. Based on research findings, malachite green had been found to cause carcinogenic
symptoms on laboratory mice [5]. Malachite green showed toxicity to many fish species, even
when used at recommended doses under different environmental conditions especially pH and
temperature [6].
Traditional wastewater treatment facilities are, however, unable to completely remove commercial
dyestuff including triphenylmethane dyes such as Crystal Violet, Malachite Green from
contaminated wastewater, thus contributing to pollution of aquatic habitats. However, among all
the processes used to treat effluent containing dyes, biological processes are getting more
attention as they are cost effective, environment friendly and do not produce large amount of
sludge [7, 8].
Use of immobilized biomass for decolorization of dyes is gaining more attention these days. In
recent years, several studies have shown that the mechanism for the decolorization of dyes using
immobilized microorganisms may include both biodegradation and adsorption [7, 9]. Verma et al.
[10] studied immobilization of Phanerochaete chrysosporium (MTCC 787) over loffa sponge for
efficient and repeated use of the biomass for removal of triphenylmethane dyes. Loffa sponge is
an inert natural cellulosic fiber matrix, obtained from ripen fruits of Loffa cylendrica.
Immobilization of the fungal biomass over the matrix improved efficiency of the biomass due to
less dense fiber packing as compared to the free fungal biomass. Immobilized yeast Candida
tropicalis grown on sugarcane bagasse extract medium, was employed to remove synthetic dye
Basic Violet 3 by Charumathi and Das in 2010 [11].
In our study, six different bacterial cells isolated from dye contaminated wastewater were used as
a bacterial consortium and immobilized on various matrices in order to find out the most suitable
one and various parameters were optimized in batch system.
Organisms
Six different highly tolerant bacterial strains to TMR dyes were isolated and grown in mineral salt
medium containing dye mix for 24 hr. The bacterial strains were determined by HiMedia DT 005,
DT 011 identification discs and DT012 identification discs and were found to be E. coli,
Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Enterobacter asburiae. In 50 ml Mineral salt medium containing dyes 0.5 ml of each of the
bacterial strains was added (approximately 0.8X109 cells/ml). Biomass was harvested by
centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min. After washing with normal saline the required amount of
biomass was used for immobilization.
Immobilization of biomass
a. Immobilization on Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)
3% CMC solution mixed with bacterial suspension at a concentration of about 1×109cells/ml. The
CMC-bacteria mixture was injected using a hypodermic syringe drop-wise to FeCl3 solution
(0.05 M) to form beads. The beads entrapped with bacterial cells (immobilized) were cured in the
FeCl3 solutions for 1hr to enhance their mechanical stabilities. Diameter of beads varied from 2 -
5 mm.
dropped into 0.2 M CaCl2 solution using a hypodermic syringe allowing beads to be formed. The
diameter of the beads ranged from 2 – 5 mm. The beads were cured in 0.2M CaCl2 solution for 2
hr to enhance their mechanical stabilities.
Figure 1. Screening of immobilization matrix for effective dye removal, initial dye
concentration 50 mg/L.
bacterial consortium they obtain 99% and 91% decolorization respectively when used at a
concentration of 50 mg/L [13]. In this study while we use the immobilized biomass at 50 mg/L of
mixed dye concentration, (they were not used separately, they were used in a mixed solution) we
also obtain a good amount of decolorization (92%). Another study made by Chen et al. [14] used
Polyvinyl alcohol immobilized microorganisms and obtain good decolorization efficiency (75%)
for an azo dye RED RBN, here also a single dye sample was used.
In our study we used immobilized bacterial consortium to determine the decolorization of mixed
dye solution, where we also obtain good decolorization at lower concentrations of dyes which
gets reduced at higher dye concentration. Under immobilized condition, as the organisms are
trapped into alginate beads they were not capable of multiply and increase their numbers.
Therefore, although the dye concentrations increase, due to lack of increasing cell numbers the
immobilized biomass failed to show decolorization at high concentration of dyes, which can be
attributed to the lower observed decolorization efficiency in this case.
Effect of pH
The experiment was performed in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml dye mix containing
Mineral salt medium where concentration of the dye was 50 mg/L at 35 C. The medium was
inoculated approximately 1 gm of immobilized beads which contains approximately 1×109
bacterial cells/ml of bacterial culture. It was observed that the percentage of dye decolorization
varied with change in pH of the medium (Figure 6). The decolorization rate peaked around pH 8
within 24 hr; the organisms decolorized 92.5% of the dye from the medium. Additionally, the
organisms also showed good decolorization efficiency at pH 7 (90.2%). Therefore, in the range of
pH neutral to mild alkaline the immobilized organisms were proved to be an efficient decolorizer
of triphenylmethane dyes. Most of these dyes found in the effluent are basic in nature. Therefore,
in this case the immobilized consortium can be used effectively in case of treatment of industrial
effluent.
Effect of temperature
The immobilized organisms were capable of carrying out decolorization over a broad temperature
range (20-45ºC).The optimum temperature for the removal of the dye was found to be 37ºC
(88.9% dye decolorization) (Figure 7), good decolorization efficiency was obtained in range of
37- 40 C . This is a convenient temperature of most tropical countries during most of the time
throughout the year, except for winter. Therefore, this ambient temperature could be considered as
beneficial for dye industries to carry dye decolorization operations with immobilized biomass.
Conclusion
The present study confirms the effective decolorizing capacity of the bacterial biomass which was
immobilized on calcium alginate matrix. Very few reports are available demonstrating the
effectiveness of immobilized bacterial consortium as decolorizer of mixed triphenylmethane dyes.
This study represents a suitable means by which triphenylmethane dye mix can be decolorized
with the help of immobilized bacterial biomass. The most suitable condition for decolorization
was also documented. The optimum conditions for removal of TPM dyes were found to be at pH
8, temperature 37°C, alginate concentration of 2% (w/v), a cell concentration of 1×109 cells/ml.
Maximum removal was obtained when dye concentration was 50 mg/L within 24 hr of
incubation.
Acknowledgement
The author is highly grateful to Scottish Church College authority and all staff members of
Microbiology Department of Scottish Church College for their support and University Grant
Commission for providing financial assistance to conduct the Minor Research Project under
F.PSW-123/15-16 (ERO).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Gregory, P. 1993, Dyes and dyes intermediates. In: Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology Vol. 8
(Kroschwitz, J. I., Ed.). John Wiley & Sons. New York, pp 544-545.
2. Azmi W., Sani R.K., and Banerjee U.C., 1998, “Biodegradation of Triphenylmethane dyes”
Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 22, pp.185-191.
3. Willian, A. U., Pathak, S., Cheryl, J., and Hsu, T. C. 1978, “Cytogenic toxicity of Gentian Violet
and Crystal Violet on mammalian cells in vitro”. Mutant. Res., 58, pp. 269-276.
4. Parshetti G., Kalme S., Saratale G. and Govindwar S., 2006. “Biodegradation of malachite green
by Kocuria rosea MTCC 1532”, Acta. Chim. Slov., 53, pp.492–498.
5. Culp S.J., Blankenship L.R., Kusewitt D.F., Doerge D.R., Mulligan L.T. and Beland F.A., 1999,
“Toxicity and metabolism of malachite green and leucomalachite green during short-term feeding
to Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice” Chem. Biol. Interact., 122, 3, pp 153–170.
6. Srivastava A.K., Sinha R., Singh N.D., Roy D., Srivastava S.J., 1995b,” Malachite green induced
changes in carbohydrate metabolism and blood chloride levels in the freshwater catfish
Heteropneustes fossilis” Acta Hydrobiol., 37, 2, pp 113–119.
7. Chen C.Y., Kuo J.T., Cheng C.Y., Huang Y.T., Ho I.H. and Chung Y.C., 2009, “Biological
decolorization of dye solution containing malachite green by Pandoraea pulmonicola YC32 using
a batch and continuous system”, J. Hazard Mater. , 172, pp. 1439–1445.
8. Wu J., Jung B.G., Kim K-S, Lee Y-C and Sung N-C, 2009, ”Isolation and characterization of
Pseudomonas otitidis WL-13 and its capacity to decolorize triphenylmethane dyes “J. Environ.
Sci., 21, pp. 960–964.
9. Pazarlioglu N.K., Urek R.O., Ergun F., 2005, “Biodecolourization of Direct Blue 15 by
immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium”, Process Biochem., 40, pp.1923–1929.
10. Verma D.K. and Banik R.M. “Decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes using immobilized fungal
biomass”, ijrimsec.com/assoc_art/volume2/ijr13-4.pdf.
11. Charumathi D. and Das N., 2010.” Removal of synthetic dye Basic Violet 3 by immobilized
Candida tropicalis grown on sugarcane bagasse extract medium” IJEST, 2 (9), pp. 4325-4335.
12. Mukherjee T. and Das M. 2018, “Microbial decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes”, IOSR-JBB,
4(2), pp.57-63.
13. Chheria J., Khaireddine M., Rouabhia M. and Bakhrouf A., 2012.”Removal of Triphenylmethane
Dyes by Bacterial Consortium”. The Sci.World J. Article D 512454, pp 1-9.doi :
10.1100/2012/512454.
14. Chen K –C , Wua J –Y , Huang C –C , Liang Y –M and John Hwang S –C .2003,
“Decolorization of azo dye using PVA-immobilized microorganisms” J. of Biotech., 101, pp 241-
252