Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 62 views

    Saluyot - Based Shampoo Statistical Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Mark Zyrus Flores Zacarias
    This document summarizes the results of a study testing the effectiveness of a saluyot-based shampoo at different concentrations (50% and 95%) compared to a control shampoo (Gugo). Key findings include: - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had similar pH levels and percentages of solid contents as the control shampoo. - The 50% saluyot shampoo had shorter wetting times than the control shampoo. - All shampoos showed no dirt dispersion. - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had better foaming abilities and stability than the control shampoo. -

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Saluyot - Based Shampoo Statistical Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Mark Zyrus Flores Zacarias
    62 views5 pages
    This document summarizes the results of a study testing the effectiveness of a saluyot-based shampoo at different concentrations (50% and 95%) compared to a control shampoo (Gugo). Key findings include: - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had similar pH levels and percentages of solid contents as the control shampoo. - The 50% saluyot shampoo had shorter wetting times than the control shampoo. - All shampoos showed no dirt dispersion. - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had better foaming abilities and stability than the control shampoo. -

    Original Title

    Statistical Analysis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the results of a study testing the effectiveness of a saluyot-based shampoo at different concentrations (50% and 95%) compared to a control shampoo (Gugo). Key findings include: - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had similar pH levels and percentages of solid contents as the control shampoo. - The 50% saluyot shampoo had shorter wetting times than the control shampoo. - All shampoos showed no dirt dispersion. - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had better foaming abilities and stability than the control shampoo. -

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    62 views5 pages

    Saluyot - Based Shampoo Statistical Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Mark Zyrus Flores Zacarias
    This document summarizes the results of a study testing the effectiveness of a saluyot-based shampoo at different concentrations (50% and 95%) compared to a control shampoo (Gugo). Key findings include: - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had similar pH levels and percentages of solid contents as the control shampoo. - The 50% saluyot shampoo had shorter wetting times than the control shampoo. - All shampoos showed no dirt dispersion. - The 50% and 95% saluyot shampoos had better foaming abilities and stability than the control shampoo. -

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    SALUYOT – BASED SHAMPOO

    Statistical Analysis
     Data were triplicated and expressed as mean ± SD. (n = 3)
     ANOVA Single Factor

    pH Level
    50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    1 8 7 7
    2 8 7 7
    3 8 7 7

    % of solid contents (%)


    50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    1 93.25 96.95 97.00
    2 95.97 96.76 96.22
    3 95.64 96.85 97.14

    Wetting Time (sec)


    50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    1 480 sec 255.5 sec 6315 sec
    2 98 sec 430 sec 6218 sec
    3 155 sec 495 sec 6073 sec

    Dirt Dispersion
    50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    1 None None None
    2 None None None
    3 None None None
    Foaming Ability and Stability
    Interval 50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    R1
    1 min 52 mL 60 mL 220 mL
    2 min 50 mL 54 mL 220 mL
    3 min 50 mL 52 mL 220 mL
    4 min 50 mL 52 mL 220 mL
    R2
    1 min 62 mL 60 mL 200 mL
    2 min 50 mL 52 mL 200 mL
    3 min 50 mL 52 mL 200 mL
    4 min 50 mL 52 mL 200 mL
    R3
    1 min 60 mL 60 mL 240 mL
    2 min 50 mL 54 mL 240 mL
    3 min 50 mL 52 mL 240 mL
    4 min 50 mL 52 mL 240 mL

    Physical Appearance / Visual Assessment


    50% 95% Gugo (+ control)
    Color Light Amber Amber Yellowish Cream
    Odor Good Good Good
    Transparency Clear Semi-Clear Clear
    CONDITIONING PERFORMANCE The mean score of the volunteers opinion on the
    conditioning performance of the tresses after treatment
    RESPONDENT NO A B C
    with shampoos (n = 102)
    FACULTY T1 1 2 2
    FACULTY T2 1 4 3 Rating scale
    FACULTY T3 4 2 3 1 = poor
    FACULTY T4 2 4 3 2 = satisfactory
    FACULTY T5 2 2 3 3 = good
    4 = poor
    FACULTY T6 1 2 4
    FACULTY T7 1 2 4
    A = tress shampooed with 95 % concentration
    FACULTY T8 1 2 4 B = tress shampooed with 50 % concentration
    FACULTY T9 1 3 1 C = tress shampooed with Gugo Shampoo
    FACULTY T10 3 3 4
    STUDENT S1 2 3 4
    STUDENT S2 2 3 3
    STUDENT S3 2 3 3
    STUDENT S4 3 1 4
    STUDENT S5 4 3 2
    STUDENT S6 3 1 3
    STUDENT S7 3 4 2
    STUDENT S8 2 3 1
    STUDENT S9 4 3 1
    STUDENT S10 3 4 2
    STUDENT S1 2 4 4
    STUDENT S2 4 3 4
    STUDENT S3 4 1 3
    STUDENT S4 3 4 2
    STUDENT S5 3 4 2
    STUDENT S6 3 3 4
    STUDENT S7 1 2 4
    STUDENT S8 1 2 4
    STUDENT S9 4 3 3
    STUDENT S10 3 4 2
    STUDENT S1 2 4 4
    STUDENT S2 3 3 4
    STUDENT S3 3 4 3
    STUDENT S4 2 4 3
    STUDENT S5 2 3 4
    STUDENT S6 2 3 3
    STUDENT S7 2 3 3
    STUDENT S8 3 2 1
    STUDENT S9 2 3 3
    STUDENT S10 2 3 4
    STUDENT S11 1 4 2
    STUDENT S1 3 4 2
    STUDENT S2 1 2 4
    STUDENT S3 3 3 3
    STUDENT S4 2 2 4
    STUDENT S5 1 4 1
    STUDENT S6 2 3 4
    STUDENT S7 2 2 4
    STUDENT S8 1 2 4
    STUDENT S9 1 2 4
    STUDENT S10 3 3 4
    LOCAL SALON S1 3 3 4
    PHIL. HAIRLINE S2 4 2 4
    DAVID'S SALON S3 4 4 4
    INDEX SALON S4 3 2 4
    INDEX SALON S5 1 2 2
    CUT E.G.S. S6 1 3 4
    CUT E.G.S. S7 2 3 4
    DAVID'S SALON S8 4 4 3
    DAVID'S SALON S9 2 2 4
    DAVID'S SALON S10 2 2 4
    LOCAL SALON S11 1 1 3
    FACULTY T1 2 3 4
    FACULTY T2 2 3 4
    FACULTY T3 3 2 4
    SG
    SECURITY 4 3 4 2
    PT
    PT FACULTY 5 3 2 3
    GL
    GRAD LIB 6 2 2 3
    RP
    RPDC 7 1 2 2
    FACULTY T8 2 3 4
    FACULTY T9 1 3 2
    FACULTY T10 1 4 3
    STUDENT S1 3 3 3
    STUDENT S2 3 3 3
    STUDENT S3 4 3 2
    STUDENT S4 2 3 2
    MS
    MED STUDENT 5 1 3 2
    MS
    MED STUDENT 6 2 3 2
    MS
    MED STUDENT 7 3 3 4
    MS
    MED STUDENT 8 3 4 2
    STUDENT S9 2 4 2
    STUDENT S10 3 4 3
    STUDENT S1 2 4 3
    STUDENT S2 2 3 3
    STUDENT S3 1 3 3
    STUDENT S4 2 3 3
    STUDENT S5 1 1 3
    STUDENT S6 2 3 4
    STUDENT S7 2 2 4
    STUDENT S8 2 4 3
    STUDENT S9 2 3 4
    STUDENT S10 2 3 4
    STUDENT S1 2 3 4
    STUDENT S2 1 4 3
    STUDENT S3 4 3 2
    STUDENT S4 2 3 3
    STUDENT S5 2 4 3
    STUDENT S6 2 3 2
    STUDENT S7 2 4 2
    STUDENT S8 2 4 3
    STUDENT S9 2 4 3
    STUDENT S10 2 4 2
    2. 2.9 3.
    MEAN SCORE 2 5 1

    You might also like