Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Museum Exhibit Scoring Rubric: Criteria

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PRESENTER: ___________________________________

PROJECT: ___________________________________
MUSEUM EXHIBIT SCORING RUBRIC EVALUATOR: ________________ DATE: ___________
UNSATISFACTORY PROFICIENT ADVANCED
CRITERIA WEIGHT (Below Performance Standards) (Minimal Criteria) (Demonstrates Exceptional Performance)
Structure and 15%  The country’s role in the war was not  The country’s role in the war was adequately  The country’s role in the war was clearly
Organization effectively illustrated by the evidence illustrated by the evidence illustrated by the evidence
 Presentation was unorganized  Presentation was sufficiently organized  Presentation was well-organized
Presentation of Exhibit  Too much lag time  Very little lag time  No lag time
 Your war “aspect” was not clearly  Your war “aspect” was clear  Your war “aspect” was crystal clear
presented
0------------5------------8 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15
 Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used
Vocal Expression (ind.) 15%  Speaker was hard to hear or  Speaker was easy to hear and understand expression and emphasis
understand  Tone was generally conversational, but with  Speaker used voice to create an emotional
Rate and Volume of Speech  Voice or tone distracted from purpose purpose
Pitch, Articulation and response in audience
of presentation  Voice sounded natural, neither patterned nor  Tone was conversational, but with
Pronunciation  Excessive use of verbal fillers monotone purpose
 Speech was read  Speaker pronounced words clearly, correctly and
without verbal fillers
0------------5------------8 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15
Physical Characteristics   In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
(ind.) 15% Little eye contact with audience Strong eye contact with entire audience
 Poor or slouchy posture  Posture conveyed confidence  Posture was commanding and purposeful
Eye Contact, Posture,  Movements were stiff or unnatural  Gestures and movements were natural and  Attire was chosen to enhance presentation
Gestures, Movement, Attire  Attire was inappropriate for audience effective
 Attire was appropriate for audience and purpose
0------------5------------8 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15

Creativity 20%  Artifacts do not clearly define country  Artifacts clearly define country or “aspect”  Well-made artifacts clearly define country
or “aspect”  Effective use of table or aspect
 Table is unclear or irrelevant  The overall display has unique features  Superior use of table
 Overall display is plain  There are a few added features  Very unique overall display
 There are no added features  Added features make the group go above
and beyond expectations
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14- - - - - - - - - - - - 15 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20

Aesthetic Quality 15%  Not Colorful  Colorful  Flourishing Color


 Sloppy  Neat  Exceedingly Neat
 Unorganized overall appearance  Overall appearance is organized  Overall appearance is excellently
organized
0------------5------------8 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15

Visual Features 20%  Unorganized PowerPoint Photo essay  Organized PowerPoint Photo essay  Superior PowerPoint Photo essay
 Inferior Propaganda Poster  Propaganda Poster well done  Excellent Propaganda Poster
Multimedia, Visuals, Audio  Charts are irrelevant or unclear  Charts are effective  Very Clear and Relevant Charts
 Maps are irrelevant or poorly made  Maps fit the display and are done well.  Maps enhance the display
 Individual assignments do not look  Individual assignments could pass as authentic  Individual assignments look authentic
authentic
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14- - - - - - - - - - - - 15 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

You might also like