Buclizine: Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Buclizine: Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Buclizine: Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Buclizine
Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Contents 1. Description 2
1.1. Nomenclature 2
1.1.1. Systematical chemical names 2
1.1.2. Nonproprietary names 2
1.1.3. Proprietary names 2
1.2. Formulae 2
1.2.1. Empirical formula, molecular weight,
and CAS number 3
1.2.2. Structural formula 3
1.3. Elemental analysis 3
1.4. Appearance 3
2. Uses and Application 3
3. Methods of Preparation 4
4. Physical Characteristics 6
4.1. Solubility 6
4.2. Melting range 6
4.3. X-ray powder diffraction pattern 6
4.4. Spectral properties 7
4.4.1. UV/VIS spectroscopy 7
4.4.2. Infrared spectrum 7
4.4.3. Nuclear magnetic resonance
spectrometry 7
4.5. Mass spectrometry 11
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia
Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients, and Related Methodology, Volume 36 # Elsevier Inc.
ISSN 1871-5125 All rights reserved.
1
2 Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
5. Methods of Analysis 12
5.1. Compendial methods 12
5.1.1. British pharmacopoeia methods [11] 12
5.2. Spectrophotometric methods 16
5.3. Potentiometric methods 18
5.4. Chromatographic methods 20
5.4.1. Thin layer chromatography 20
5.4.2. Gas chromatography 28
5.4.3. High-performance liquid chromatography 28
6. Stability 32
Acknowledgment 32
References 32
1. DESCRIPTION
1.1. Nomenclature
1.1.1. Systematical chemical names
1-[(4-chorophenyl)phenylmethyl]-4-[(4-tert-butylphenyl)methyl]
piperazine;
1-(p-tert-butylbenzyl)-4-(p-chloro-a-phenylbenzyl)piperazine;
1-(p-chlorobenzhydryl)-4-(p-tert-butylbenzyl)diethylenediamine;
1-(p-tert-butylbenzyl)-4-(p-chlorodiphenylmethyl)piperazine;
(RS)-1-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)-4-(4-chlorobenzhydryl)piperazine
dihydrochloride;
Piperazine, 1[(4-chlorophenyl)phenylmethyl]-4-[[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)
phenyl]methyl];
1-(p-chlorobenzhydryl)-4-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)-hexahydropyrazine;
1-[(4-chlorophenyl)phenylmethyl]-4-[(4-tert-butylphenyl)-methyl]
piperazidine [1–6].
1.2. Formulae
1.2.1. Empirical formula, molecular weight, and CAS number
CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
CH3
1.4. Appearance
A white or slightly yellowish, crystalline powder, odorless and
tasteless [5,6].
3. METHODS OF PREPARATION
O CH3
MgBr
Cl C HN N CH2 C CH3 HCl, KCN,
H + 3
CH3
2 1
Cl
CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
CH3
4
Lui et al. [8] prepared buclizine by reducing p-chlorophenyl phenyl
ketone 1 with potassium borohydride to p-chlorobenzhydryl alcohol 2,
which was converted into p-chlorobenzhydryl bromide 3. The latter com-
pound 3 was prepared by reaction of p-chlorophenylmagnesium bromide
4 with benzaldehyde 5. p-tert-Butylbenzyl chloride 6 was condensed
directly with piperazine 7 to give p-tert-butylbenzylpiperazine 8. Treat-
ment of p-chlorobenzhydryl bromide 3 with p-tert-butylbenzylpiperazine
8 in the presence of anhydrous sodium carbonate gave buclizine 9
hydrochloride.
Buclizine 5
Cl Cl Cl
H H O
KBH4
C O C C Cl MgBr + C
OH Br H
4 5
1 2 3
CH3 CH3
ClH2C C CH3 + HN NH HN N CH2 C CH3
CH3 CH3
6 7 8
Cl
H CH3
C + HN N CH2 C CH3 Na2CO3
Br
CH3
3 8
Cl
CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
CH3
9
Cossement et al. [9] synthesized the enantiomers of 1-(p-chlorobenzhy-
dryl)-4-(p-methylphenyl)sulfonyl piperazine 3 and used it as an interme-
diate for the preparation of buclizine 6 and other histamines. The
enantiomers of (þ)- and ()-1-(p-chlorobenzhydryl)-4-(p-toluene sulfo-
nyl)piperazine 3 were prepared and converted by hydrolysis to the enan-
tiomers of (þ)- or ()- of p-chlorobenzhydryl piperazine 4. Compound 3
was prepared by refluxing p-chlorobenzhydrylamine 1 with N-bis-2-
chloroethyl-p-toluene sulfonamide 2 with ethyl diisopropylamine. Reac-
tion of p-tert-butylbenzyl chloride 5 with p-chlorobenzhydryl piperazine 4
gives buclizine 6.
6 Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Cl
Cl CH2 CH2 O
CH NH2 N S CH3
+ Ethyl diisopropylamine
Cl CH2 CH2 O
1 2
Cl Cl
O
CH N N S CH3 Hydrolysis CH N NH
O
3 4
Cl
CH3
ClCH2 C CH3
CH3 CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
5 CH3
4. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
4.1. Solubility
Practically insoluble in water; sparingly soluble in chloroform and in
propane-1, 2-diol; very slightly soluble in ethanol (96%) [5].
800
600
4.691
6.062
12.100
400
3.966
4.414
12.800
3.736
3.087
4.149
7.369
200
3.464
6.652
5.035
2.847
3.300
2.928
3.229
2.650
3.386
2.996
2.704
2.210
2.354
2.106
2.247
1.971
1.894
1.826
1.875
2.291
2.047
3.573
2.527
2.447
1.625
5.640
1.748
1.685
1.596
0
10,0000 20,0000 30,0000 40,0000 50,0000 60,0000
2q (°)
TABLE 1.1 Data deduced from X-ray powder diffraction pattern of buclizine
Peak no. Diffraction angel (2y) Flex width d-value Intensity I/Io
3.000
2.000
A
b
s
.
1.000
0.000
200.0 220.0 240.0 260.0 280.0 300.0
Wavelength (nm)
49.4
45
40
Percentage temperature
740.25
35
578.82
877.39 494.22
30 440.75
1654.06 507.49
1724.64 1031.78
25 1700.30 1202.13 614.07
1604.40 1294.45 1108.84 866.93 705.69
1238.07
1019.85 624.89
20 312.62 1078.60
1517.09 845.95 650.29
1397.661270.21
1378.22 539.96
15 2625.26 1093.83 723.57
3430.50 3051.80 1362.84
10 942.39
922.38
2502.11 1496.21 809.60
1473.08 763.82
5 2343.79
1436.78
2961.50
1.0
4400.0 4000 3000 2000 1500 1000 400.0
cm-1
3051 Aromatic CH
2961 Aliphatic CH
1093 C–C
1604 C¼C
1312 C–N
1111 C–Cl
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ppm
1.00
1.12
4.61
2.40
8.00
0.91
1.12
4.65
2.37
4.66
0.98
12.10
0.55
1
FIGURE 1.4 H NMR spectrum of buclizine in CDCl3.
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 ppm
4.61
2.40
8.00
0.91
1.12
4.65
2.37
4.66
Figs. 1.6–1.8. The assignments for the observed resonance bands asso-
ciated with the various carbons are listed in Table 1.4. Figures 1.9–1.15
show the HSQC, HMBC, DEPT 90 and DEPT 135 NMR spectra,
respectively.
TABLE 1.3 Assignment of the resonance bands in the 1H NMR spectrum of buclizine
30
29
H3C
25 27 CH3
26
24
CH3
21 28
23
20
22
1N
6 2
5 3
N4
13 19
14
12
8 7 18
9 15 17
Cl 11 10 16
5. METHODS OF ANALYSIS
5.1.1.2. Identification
Test A: The infrared absorption spectrum, Appendix IIA, is concordant
with the reference spectrum of buclizine hydrochloride (RS O32).
Buclizine 13
154.13
136.25
132.91
131.77
130.95
130.23
130.14
129.92
128.32
126.58
123.90
77.50
77.30
77.05
76.79
60.60
48.49
47.45
47.36
34.85
31.12
200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 ppm
13
FIGURE 1.6 C NMR spectrum of buclizine in CDCl3.
5.1.1.3. Tests
Related substances
Carry out the method for liquid chromatography, Appendix IIID, using
four solutions in the initial mobile phase containing (1) 0.001% (w/v) of
buclizine hydrochloride; (2) 0.50% (w/v) of buclizine hydrochloride;
(3) 0.001% (w/v) of 1,4-biz(4-chlorobenzhydryl)piperazine BPCRS; and
(4) 0.50% (w/v) of buclizine hydrochloride impurity standard BPCRS.
The chromatographic procedure may be carried out using a stainless
steel column (20 cm 4 cm) packed with octadecylsilyl silica gel for chro-
matography (10 mm) (Nucleosil, C18 is suitable). Use as the initial mobile
phase 0.01 M sodium heptane sulfonate in a mixture of 55 volumes of water
and 45 volumes of acetonitrile and as the final mobile phase 0.01 M sodium
14 Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
130.952
130.231
130.149
129.920
128.320
126.579
132.0 131.5 131.0 130.5 130.0 129.5 129.0 128.5 128.0 127.5 127.0 126.5 126.0 ppm
12.37
50.22
14.64
12.97
136.25
132.91
131.77
130.95
130.23
130.14
129.92
128.32
126.58
123.90
140 138 136 134 132 130 128 126 124 122 ppm
Loss on drying
TABLE 1.4 Assignment for the resonance bands in the 13C NMR spectrum of buclizine
30
29
H3C
25 27 CH3
26
24
CH3
21 28
23
20
22
1N
6 2
5 3
N4
13 19
14
12
8 7 18
9 15 17
Cl 11 10 16
5.1.1.5. Impurities
A. 1,4-bis-(4-chlorobenzyhydryl)piperazine.
B. 4-chlorobenhydrol, 1-(4-chlorobenzyhydryl)piperazine, 4-chlorobenzo-
phenone.
ppm
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ppm
ppm
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 ppm
and Beer’s law was obeyed in the concentration range of 4–30 mg/ml.
To validate the method, the results obtained were compared statistically
with a newly developed UV-derivative spectrophotometric method.
The charge-transfer method was favored due to its higher sensitivity.
ppm
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ppm
77.505
77.256
31.114
200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ppm
130.95
130.23
130.15
129.92
128.32
126.58
77.50
77.26
70.59
60.60
48.49
47.45
47.36
31.12
0.1 N-trifluoromethyl sulfonic acid. The end-point was detected with use
of glass Ag/AgCl combination electrode. Results compared well with
those obtained using perchloric acid as titrant. The coefficient of variation
were 0.42% and recoveries were > 99%.
77.50
77.26
70.59
60.60
48.49
47.45
47.36
31.12
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 ppm
FIGURE 1.14 The expanded DEPT 135 13C NMR of buclizine in CDCl3.
130.95
130.23
130.15
129.92
128.32
126.58
FIGURE 1.15 The expanded DEPT 135 13C NMR of buclizine in CDCl3.
100 73
185 241
55
56
57
207 221
125
% 147
143
281
97
98
283
84
121
357
166
101 222 355
284
91 242
111
341
431
223
54 358 415
369 433
296 327
51 372401 434 489 503 549 565 579
461
0 m/z
73 123 173 223 273 323 373 423 473 523 573
Fragment
m/z Relative intensity (%) Formula Structure
433 5 C28H33N2Cl
Cl
CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
CH3
355 18 C22H28N2Cl Cl
CH3
CH N N CH2 C CH3
CH3
341 13 C21H26N2Cl Cl
CH3
CH N N CH2 CH
CH3
285 5 C17H18N2Cl
Cl
CH N N
284 15 C17H17N2Cl
Cl
CH N N
283 38 C17H16N2Cl
Cl
CH N N
221 58 C12H14N2Cl
Cl
CH N N CH
207 59 C11H12N2Cl
Cl
CH N N
(continued)
TABLE 1.5 (continued)
Fragment
185 85 C12H13N2
CH N N CH2
125 55 C7H6Cl Cl
CH2
111 15 C6H4Cl
Cl
98 38 C5H10N2
N N CH2
97 40 C5H9N2
N N CH2
91 14 C7H7
CH2
73 100 C3H9N2 H
N
N
H H
71 38 C3H7N2 H
N
N
H
57 72 C4H9 CH3
C CH3
CH3
56 76 C4H8 CH2
C CH3
CH3
28 Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
The method was applied directly and easily to the analysis of the pharma-
ceutical tablet preparations. Mean percent relative standard deviation was
found to be 0.6231% (LongifeneÒ tablet 25 mg). The method was
completely validated and proven to be rugged. This validated UV spec-
trophotometric method is potentially useful for a routine laboratory anal-
ysis because of its simplicity, rapidity, sensitivity, precision, and accuracy.
Arayne et al. [29] developed and validated a reversed-phase high-
performance liquid chromatographic method for the estimation of bucli-
zine hydrochloride and other H1-receptor antagonists in the presence of
gliquidone. A good chromatographic separation between these drugs was
achieved using a mobile phase containing methanol–water (80:20) at pH
3.5 with a flow rate of 1 ml/min; and detection was performed at 230 nm
with a UV detector. Validation of the method was performed in terms
linearity, accuracy, precision, and limit of detection and quantification.
The linearity of the calibration curve of buclizine hydrochloride was
0.325–50 mg/ml (r ¼ 0.9967). There was no significant difference between
the amount of drug spiked in serum and the amount recovered, and
serum did not interfere in the simultaneous estimation. The method is
suitable for the simultaneous analysis of the active ingredients in tablet
dosage forms and human serum.
Arun et al. [30] developed and validated a rapid high-performance
liquid chromatographic method for the estimation of buclizine hydro-
chloride in tablet dosage form. The stationary phase used was precoated
silica gel 60 F254. The mobile phase used was a mixture of methanol:
chloroform:ammonia (8:1:1). The detection of spots was carried out at
234 nm. The method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, preci-
sion, and specificity. The calibration curve was linear between 100 and
700 ng/spot. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were
20 and 100 ng/spot, respectively. The method can be used to determine
the drug content of tablet dosage formulation.
Clarke [10] reported the following HPLC systems:
Column: Silica Spherisorb S5W (125 4.9 mm, 5 mm).
Mobile phase: Solution containing 1.175 g (0.01 M) of ammonium perchlo-
rate in 1 l methanol; adjust to pH 6.7 by the addition of 1 ml 0.1 M
sodium hydroxide in methanol.
K values 0.7 [23].
Column: C18 symmetry (250 4.6 mm, 5 mm).
Column temperature: 40 C.
Mobile phase: (A:B) Sulfuric acid (0.5 ml of 2.5 M) in water (500 ml); sulfuric
acid (0.5 ml of 2.5 M) in acetonitrile (500 ml).
Elution program: (98:2) for 3 min to (2.88) over 23 min, hold for 10 min back
to initial conditions over 2 min with equilibration of 8 min before next
injection.
32 Gamal A.E. Mostafa and Abdullah A. Al-Badr
Detection: UV diode-array.
Standards: Nitro-n-alkanes (C1 to C16) 10 ml in 10 ml acetonitrile.
RI ¼ 454 [31].
6. STABILITY
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank Mr. Tanvir A. Butt, Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department,
College of Pharmacy, King Saud University for his secretarial assistance in preparing this
profile.
REFERENCES
[1] The Merck Index, An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals, 14th ed.,
Merck & Co., INC, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA, 2006, p. 240.
[2] S.Y. P’an, J.F. Gardocki, J.C. Reilly, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 43 (1954) 653–656.
[3] W. Meindl, Arch. Pharm. 321 (1988) 473–476.
[4] V.C. Saxena, S.K. Bapat, B.N. Dhawan, Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 19 (1969) 477–784.
[5] Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopeia, 31st ed., Royal Pharmaceuticals Society of Great
Britain, 1996, 435–436.
[6] A.R. Gennaro (Ed.), Remington’s: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 18th ed., Mack
Publishing Co., Pennsylvania, USA, 1995, p. 1019.
[7] H.G. Morren, H. Strubbe, J. Pharm. Belg. 10 (1955) 239–245.
[8] C.M. Lui, I.C. Yu, L.Y. Li, Yaoxue Xuebao 11 (1964) 317–320.
[9] E. Cossement, G. Bodson, J. Gobert, Eur. Pat. (1994) EP 617028 A1 19940928.
[10] A.C. Moffat, M.D. Osselton, B. Widdop, Clarck’s Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, Vol. 2,
3rd ed., The Pharmaceutical Press, 2004, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain,
p. 954.
[11] British Pharmacopoeia, Vol. 1, The Stationary Office, London, 2005, p. 290.
[12] W. Pregnolatto, N.L. Pissatto, Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz 34 (1974) 69–77.
[13] V. Annapurna, G. Jyothi, V. Nagalakshmi, B.B.V. Sailaja, J. Indian Chem. Soc. 86 (2009)
358–363.
[14] A.M. El Walily, A. El Gindy, A.A.M. Wahbi, Spectrosc. Lett. 29 (1996) 217–230.
[15] N.A. Zakhari, S.M. Ahmed, K.A. Kovar, Pharmeuropa 3 (1991) 269–273.
[16] S. Tang, Yaoxue Tongbao 22 (1987) 292–293.
[17] A.H. Stead, R. Gill, T. Wright, J.B. Gibbs, A.C. Moffat, Analyst 107 (1982) 1106–1168.
[18] R.A. de Zeeuw, J.P. Franke, F. Degel, G. Machbert, H. Schutz, J. Wijsbeek (Eds.), Thin
layer chromatographic Rf values of Toxicologically Relevant Substances on Standar-
dized Systems, 2nd ed., VCH, Weinheim, 1992, Report XVII of the DFG Commission for
Clinical-Toxicological Analysis.
[19] R.A. de Zeeuw (Ed.), Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Toxicologically Rele-
vant Substances on Packed or Capillary Columns with Dimethylsilicone Stationary
Phases, 3rd ed., The International Association of Forensic Toxologists and Deutsche,
Buclizine 33