Pharmacovigilance Inspection Report
Pharmacovigilance Inspection Report
Pharmacovigilance Inspection Report
PSMF :
[Delete guidance notes and other non-applicable parts of this document before finalising]
Version number:
Date of issuance:
Table of contents
Abbreviations..............................................................................................3
SECTION A: Administrative information......................................................3
SECTION B: General information.................................................................3
B.1. Scope and reason for the inspection.............................................................................3
B.2. Reference texts and documents for the inspection...........................................................3
B.3. Conduct of the inspection with summary of the organisation and any significant changes and
action taken since the last inspection......................................................................................3
SECTION C: Inspected items.......................................................................3
SECTION D: Findings...................................................................................3
D.1. Definitions of inspection finding grading........................................................................3
D.2. Guidance for responding to inspection findings...............................................................3
D.3. Inspection findings.....................................................................................................3
D.3.1. Critical findings......................................................................................................3
D.3.2. Major findings........................................................................................................3
D.3.3. Minor findings........................................................................................................3
D.3.4. Comments.............................................................................................................3
SECTION E:.................................................................................................3
E.1 Conclusions...........................................................................................3
E.2 Recommendations.................................................................................3
E.3 Evaluation by the inspectors of the response from the inspectee..........3
E.4 Final conclusions and recommendations................................................3
SECTION F: Date and signatures of lead and other inspectors, experts if
applicable...................................................................................................3
APPENDIX I - Summary of items inspected -optional..................................3
APPENDIX II - Pharmacovigilance inspection plan......................................3
APPENDIX III - Closing meeting attendance record....................................3
Page 2/16
Abbreviations
ADR Adverse Drug Reaction
AE Adverse Event
CA Competent Authority
IR Inspection Report
PhV/PV Pharmacovigilance
QA Quality Assurance
RA Regulatory Authority
TBA To Be Announced
Page 3/16
SECTION A: Administrative information
Date(s) of inspection:
Accompanying inspector(s)
and experts:
Purpose of inspection:
Products selected to provide As part of the general systems review, there are
system examples: products chosen for close evaluation of ADR reports,
PSURs, etc.
Note also: CAPs, MRPs, NAs as appropriate
Name and location of EU/EEA Name:
qualified person for Contact details:
pharmacovigilance:
Date of first issue of report to Date of submission
MAH:
Page 4/16
SECTION B: General information
The inspection was performed in accordance with the inspection plan (attached as Appendix II). If
necessary include the adjustments or changes.
A closing meeting was held to review the inspection findings, at place and date and attendance record
(Appendix III).
SECTION D: Findings
Critical (CR): a deficiency in pharmacovigilance systems, practices or processes that adversely affects
the rights, safety or well-being of patients or that poses a potential risk to public health or that
represents a serious violation of applicable legislation and guidelines.
Page 5/16
Major (MA): a deficiency in pharmacovigilance systems, practices or processes that could potentially
adversely affect the rights, safety or well-being of patients or that could potentially pose a risk to
public health or that represents a violation of applicable legislation and guidelines.
Minor (MI): a deficiency in pharmacovigilance systems, practices or processes that would not be
expected to adversely affect the rights, safety or well-being of patients or pose a risk to public health.
Comment: the observations might lead to suggestions on how to improve quality or reduce the
potential for a deviation to occur in the future.
The factual matter contained in the inspection report relates only to those things that the inspection
team saw and heard during the inspection process. The inspection report is not to be taken as implying
a satisfactory state of affairs in documentation, premises, equipment, personnel or procedures not
examined during the inspection.
Responses to inspection findings should be clear, concise and include proposed actions to address both
the identified deficiency and the root cause of the deficiency. Consideration should also be given to
identifying and preventing other potential similar deficiencies within the pharmacovigilance system.
Responses should be entered directly into the table(s) in section D.3.1., without changes to the
inspectors’ text that describes the findings. The following text is intended as guidance when
considering the information that should be entered into each of the fields within the table(s). ‘Not
applicable’ should be entered into the relevant field if the requested information is not appropriate for
the finding in question.
Page 6/16
D.3. Inspection findings
.3.1. Critical findings
Present the critical findings as corresponding to the definition.
References:
Further assessment
<<MAH to add text>>
Corrective action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
Preventative Action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
References:
Page 7/16
Further assessment
<<MAH to add text>>
Corrective action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
Preventative action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
References:
Further assessment
<<MAH to add text>>
Corrective action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
Page 8/16
Deliverable(s) Due date(s)
<<MAH to add text>> <<MAH to add text>>
Preventative action(s)
<<MAH to add text>>
.3.4. Comments
Issues the inspectors would like to communicate to the inspectee– but that do not necessarily
represent any finding.
SECTION E:
E.1 Conclusions
E.2 Recommendations
Page 9/16
APPENDIX I - Summary of items inspected -optional
If the list of items covered during the inspection has been provided in section (B.1), Appendix I is
optional and may be deleted.
(Please enter, which areas were inspected during the inspection, if necessary enter comments or
specify).
1. QPPV
Qualifications
Job description
System oversight
Back-up process and
delegation
Others
2. PSMF
Format
Content
Maintenance and
submission
Others
3. Written
instructions (SOPs,
manuals, etc)
Procedures
Manuals
Process for SOP training
Others
4. Contracts,
agreements
Contracts
Agreements
Others
5. Periodic safety
update reports
PSUR scheduling
Format and content
Quality control of PSURs
Page 10/16
Extent* Extent* Findings Comments
(Y/N)
Yes No
CR MA
Timeliness of
submission
Assessment report
comments
Others
6. Risk-management
system
Risk-management plan
format and content
Compliance with risk-
minimisation measures
which are beyond
routine
pharmacovigilance
Others
7. Management and
reporting of adverse
reactions
Receipt of ICSRs from
all sources and
collection and collation
at one point within the
EU
Assessments of
seriousness, causality
and expectedness
Medical review and
MedDRA coding
QC process
Submissions and follow
up processes
Reporting procedures
for PSP, PASS, PAES,
other non-interventional
trials
Literature screening
Others
8. Computerised
systems used for
pharmacovigilance
Page 11/16
Extent* Extent* Findings Comments
(Y/N)
Yes No
CR MA
activities
Process for ensuring
computerised systems
Documentation of
fitness for purpose
Backup and disaster
recovery process
Process for migration of
database
Others
9. Clinical trials
SUSAR reporting
Consistency between
the IB and SPC when
marketed products are
used in CT
Reconciliation of SAEs
between clinical trial
and pharmacovigilance
databases.
Others
10. Signal
management
Dataset used for
conducting signal
detection (inclusion of
information from all
relevant sources)
Periodicity of data
review
Cumulative review
Process for further
validation and
investigation
Timely update of SmPCs
and PILs following signal
confirmation
Others
11. Product quality
Review of quality
Page 12/16
Extent* Extent* Findings Comments
(Y/N)
Yes No
CR MA
14. Training
Initial and on-going
training
Evaluation of training
Maintenance of training
records
16. Medical
information
Reconciliation between
medical information
Page 13/16
Extent* Extent* Findings Comments
(Y/N)
Yes No
CR MA
* Yes – this means an assessment of this area was undertaken that was considered sufficient by the
inspector to make an assessment of compliance and identify any issues.
No – this area was not looked at. This could be because it wasn’t necessary to address the scope of
the inspection or answer any concerns/questions in the inspection request.
Please note that the above items are not an exhaustive list, and other areas should be examined, as
appropriate to ensure the scope and objectives of the inspection are met.
Page 14/16
APPENDIX II - Pharmacovigilance inspection plan
Page 15/16
APPENDIX III - Closing meeting attendance record
Page 16/16