RMC 63-2020
RMC 63-2020
RMC 63-2020
The following are the valid reasons for an employee who may not meet the nine-month actual
service requirement to be considered for PBB on a pro-rata basis:
a. Being a newly hired-employee;
b. Retirement;
c. Resignation;
d. Rehabilitation Leave;
e. Maternity Leave and/or Paternity Leave;
f. Vacation or Sick Leave with or without pay;
g. Scholarship/Study Leave; and
h. Sabbatical Leave
The following personnel are not eligible to the grant of the FY 2020 PBB:
a. An employee who is on vacation or sick leave, with or without pay, for the entire year;
b. Personnel found guilty of administrative and/or criminal cases by final and executory
judgment in FY 2020 (if the penalty meted out is only a reprimand, such penalty shall not
cause the disqualification to the PBB);
c. Officials and employees who failed to submit the 2019 Statement of Assets, Liabilities
and Networth (SALN) or those who are responsible for the non-compliance with the
establishment and conduct of the review and compliance procedure of SALN;
d. Officials and employees who failed to liquidate all cash advances received in FY 2020
within the reglementary period; and
e. Officials and employees who failed to submit their complete Strategic Performance
Management System (SPMS) Forms.
Officials and employees responsible for the implementation of the prior years' audit
recommendations, QMS certification, or posting and dissemination of the department/ agency
system of ranking performance of delivery units, shall not be entitled to the FY 2020 PBB if
the department/agency fails to comply with any of these requirements.
Bureaus, offices or delivery units eligible to the PBB shall be forced ranked according to the
following categories:
For FY 2020, agencies that are unable to comply with all the GGCs shall be considered
ineligible for the FY 2020 PBB. Departments/agencies that are unable to comply with a maximum of
two (2) Performance Targets due to controllable factors, as determined by the validating agencies,
shall be considered ineligible for the FY 2020 PBB.
In the event the AO25 Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) conducted a random check of
submitted SALN of employees and found non-compliance with the guidelines prescribed by the CSC
and the posted Review and Compliance Procedure of the concerned department/agency, such incident
could be a cause to disqualify the department/agency in the succeeding cycle of the PBB.
A department/agency/GOCC/LWD/LGU which, after due process by the oversight agency
has been determined to have committed the following prohibited acts, shall be disqualified from the
PBB in the succeeding year of its implementation:
a. Misrepresentation in the submitted/posted reports and requirements for the PBB, a
commission of fraud in the payment of the PBB and violation of the provisions of this
guidelines (AO25 IATF Memorandum Circular No. 2020-1); and
b. Evenly distributing PBB among employees in an agency, in violation of the policy of
paying the PBB based on the ranking of delivery units.
Moreover, the CSC or Ombudsman shall file the appropriate administrative case.