Double Step-Down Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter
Double Step-Down Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter
Double Step-Down Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter
2015 KIPE
777
and S23 are turned on while switches S21 and S24 are §1 2·
S11 S13 1 § Vin ·
2
©
(
¨ 2 Llk iTR (θ 0 ) ) ¸
¹
ECS11 = ⋅ C S11 ⋅ ¨ ¸ = (1)
S12 2 © 2 ¹ 3
S14
S 21, S 24 S 22 , S 23
,where ECs11 is energy of capacitor C S 11 and C S 11 is
vTR Vin
equivalent capacitance of switch S11.
2
0
Vin
θ B. Mode 2 [ θ1 ~ θ 2 ]
−
2
vSEC
Vo In this mode, switches S11 is turned on and S14, S12,
and S13 remain previous mode state. All of secondary
0
θ switches also remain previous mode state. Switch S11 is
−Vo turned on while diode DS11 conducts and no current
iTR passes through the switch S11 until the transformer
current polarity changes from negative to positive to
θ achieve ZVS.
Vin
v DS vTR = (2)
vS13 vS11 Vin 2
2 v SEC = −Vo (3)
θ
v DS
vS12
iTR (θ ) = iTR (θ1 ) +
(VTR − VSEC n)
Vin
(θ2 − θ1 ) (4)
vS14 Vin ω Llk
2
θ
iS11 iS12
C. Mode 3 [ θ 2 ~ θ3 ]
i SW
In this mode, primary side switches S11, S14 remains on
state and S12, S13 remains off state. Secondary side
θ
switches S21, S24 remains off state and Switches S22, S23
iS14 are turned off. Capacitors CS21, CS24 are discharged and
i SW iS13
CS22, CS23 are charged by the stored energy of leakage
inductance. After CS21, CS24 are fully discharged, diodes
θ
DS21, DS24 are turned on and input energy is delivered to
output through the two diodes DS21 and DS24 .
v DS vS 21 , vS24 vS22 , vS23
§1 2·
1
(
¨ 2 Llk iTR (θ 2 ) ) ¸
= ⋅ CS 21 ⋅ (Vo ) = © ¹
2
θ ECS 24 = EC21 (5)
i SW 2 2
D. Mode 4 [ θ 3 ~ θ 4 ]
θ In this mode primary switches remains same as in
previous mode. Secondary side switch S21 and S24 are
θ0 θ1 θ 2 θ3 θ 4 θ5 θ 6 θ 7 θ8 θ9 θ10 θ11 θ12 turned on while switches S22 and S23 remains off.
( 0 ) (δ ) (φ ) (π ) Switches S21 and S24 are turned on while transformer
current flows through the diodes DS21 and DS24. Energy of
Fig. 2. Key waveforms of the proposed converter.
input side is delivered to output through the capacitor C1
and transformer.
turned off. Capacitors CS12 and CS13 are charged and CS11
Vin
is discharged by the stored energy of leakage inductance. vTR = (6)
2
After CS11 is fully discharged, diode DS11 is turned on and v SEC = Vo (7)
energy of leakage inductance freewheels through the two
diodes DS11 , DS14 and capacitor C1.
iTR (θ ) = iTR (θ3 ) +
(VTR − VSEC n)
ωLlk
(θ4 − θ3 ) (8)
778
v SEC = Vo (15)
779
iTR (θ ) = iTR (θ11 ) +
(VTR − VSEC n) io
(θ12 − θ11 ) (24) DS 21
ω Llk
S21
CS11
DS11 io iTR Llk 1: n
DS 22 +
+
CS12 v+TR v+
SEC Co RL Vo
C1 VC1 S 22 − −
DS13 −
Vin iTR Llk
− 1: n
+ + S13 S14 S24
vTR +
vSEC RL
Co Vo DS 24
CS13 − − DS14
−
io
(a) Mode 1 [ θ 0 ~ θ1 ]
DS 21
+ CS12
C1 S12 DS12 S21
DS11 io VC1
iTR Llk 1: n
DS 22 − +
+ + +
vTR vSEC Co RL Vo
C1 VC1 S 22 − −
Vin iTR Llk −
− 1: n
+ + S13 CS14 S24
vTR + RL
vSEC Co Vo
− − DS13 DS 24
−
S14 DS 23 S23 (g) Mode 7 [ θ 6 ~ θ 7 ]
DS14
io
(b) Mode 2 [ θ1 ~ θ 2 ]
+ DS12
C1 VC1 S12 DS 21 S21
DS11 io
− iTR Llk
1: n
+ + + RL +
S11 CS 21 vTR vSEC Co Vo
C1 VC1 DS 21 − −
Vin iTR Llk CS 22 −
− 1: n
+ +
+ RL S24
vTR vSEC Co Vo
− − DS 24
−
CS 24
S14 CS 23
DS14 (h) Mode 8 [ θ 7 ~ θ 8 ]
DS 24
io
(c) Mode 3 [ θ 2 ~ θ 3 ]
+ CS 22
DS12 C S 21
DS11 io C1 VC1 S12
− iTR Llk 1: n DS 22
S11 + + +
+ RL
C1 VC1 DS 21 S21 vTR vSEC Co Vo
Vin − −
− iTR Llk 1: n −
+ C S 23 CS 24
+ + S13
vTR vSEC Co RL Vo
− − DS 23
−
S14 S24
DS14
DS 24 (i) Mode 9 [ θ 8 ~ θ 9 ]
(d) Mode 4 [ θ 3 ~ θ 4 ] io
+
CS11 DS12
io C1 VC1 S12 S 22
Vin iTR Llk DS 22
− 1: n
+ DS 21 +
+ +
CS12 vTR vSEC Co RL
C1 VC1 S21 Vo
− −
Vin iTR Llk −
− 1: n
+ S13 S 23
+
v+TR vSEC Co RL Vo DS 23
DS13 − −
−
S14 S24
(j) Mode 10 [ θ 9 ~ θ10 ]
CS13 DS14 DS 24
(e) Mode 5 [ θ 4 ~ θ 5 ]
780
io the mode analysis, capacitor energy of switch depends on
+
transformer current. Proposed converter has wider ZVS
C1 VC1 DS12 S22 range than conventional converter under the light load
− iTR Llk
1: n DS 22 condition since transformer current is half and required
+
+
vTR +
vSEC Co RL Vo
switch voltage to achieve ZVS is half as compared with
− −
− conventional DAB converter. The proposed converter
S13 CS14 S23 eliminates the transformer saturation problem as the
DS14
DS13 DS 23 transformer current satisfies the charge balance condition
due to the additional capacitor.
(k) Mode 11 [ θ10 ~ θ11 ]
io TABLE I
VOLTAGE STRESS COMPARISON OF PROPOSED CONVERTER
Conventional Proposed
S22
DAB Converter DAB Converter
iTR Llk DS 22
1: n
+ + + Vin
vTR vSEC Co RL Vo
vTR Vin
− − 2
−
CS13 iTR iTR 2iTR with same Po
S13 S14 S23
DS14 DS 23
Vin
Vin for all for three
v SW with primary side 2
(l) Mode 12 [ θ11 ~ θ12 ] switches
switches
Fig. 3. Operation modes of the proposed converter.
ZVS ZVS ZVS
Transformer
O X
III. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED CONVERTER saturation
781
after switch voltage is zero. Transformer current direction
is changed after switch is turned on. All switches of
primary side achieve ZVS operation as shown in vGS11 [20V /div]
experimental results. Fig. 11(a) show the transformer
voltage and current of proposed DAB converter and Fig. vDS11 [100V /div]
11(b) shows the conventional DAB converter under
different duty ratio. Proposed DAB converter operates iTR [20 A/div]
without transformer saturation problem. However
conventional DAB converter has a DC component in
transformer current causing saturation even though the
converter has slight mismatch in the duty ratio between
the two legs of primary side switches.
[5 μ sec/div] [1 μ sec/div]
Fig. 6. Switch voltage of proposed converter Fig. 10. Switch voltage of proposed converter
782
REFERENCES
vTR [100V /div] [1] F. Krismer, and J. W. Kolar, “Efficiency-Optimized High-
iTR [10 A/div] Current Dual Active Bridge Converter for Automotive
Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2745–2760, Jul. 2012.
[2] S. M. Lukic, J. Cao, R. C. Bansal, F. Rodriguez, and A.
Emadi, “Energy Storage Systems for Automotive
Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2258–2267, Jun. 2008.
[3] C. Zhao, S. D. Round, and J. W. Kolar, “An Isolated
Three-Port Bidirectional DC-DC Converter With
Decoupled Power Flow Management,” IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2443–2453, Sep.
2008.
[4] M. Cacciato, A. Consoli, R. Attanasio, and F. Gennaro,
vSEC [100V /div] “Soft-Switching Conveter With HF Transformer for Grid-
[5 μ sec/div] Connected Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1678–1686, May.
(a) Proposed DAB converter with different duty ratio 2010.
[5] R. A. Friedemann, F. Krismer, and J. W. Kolar, “Design of
iTR [5 A/div] vTR [200V /div] a minimum weight dual active bridge converter for an
airborne wind turbine system,” Applied Power Electronics
Conference and Exposition(APEC), 2012 Twenty-Seventh
Annual IEEE, pp. 509–516, Feb. 2012.
[6] F. Z. Peng, H. Li, G. J. Su, and J. S. Lawler, “A new ZVS
bidirectional DC-DC converter for fuel cell and battery
application,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.
19, no. 1, pp. 54–65, Jan. 2004.
[7] H. Qin, and J. W. Kimball, “Solid_State Transformer
Achitecture Using AC-AC Dual-Active-Bridge Converter,”
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 9,
pp. 3720–3730, Sep. 2013.
[8] K. Rustom, W. Wu, W. Qiu, and I. Batarseh, “Asymmetric
half bridge soft-switching PFC converter with direct
vSEC [100V /div] [5 μ sec/div] Energy Transfer,” Power Electronics Specialists
Conference, 2002. pesc 02. 2002 IEEE 33rd Annual, vol. 2,
pp. 676-681, Jun. 2002.
(b) Conventional DAB converter with different duty ratio
[9] M. Arias, P and D. G. Lamar, F. F. Linera, D. Balocco, A.
Fig. 11. Transformer current under the different duty ratio A. Diallo, and J. Sebastian, “Design of a Soft-Switching
Asymmetrical Half-Bridge Converter as Second Stage of
an LED Driver for Street Lighting Application, ”IEEE
Transactins on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1608-
V. CONCLUSIONS 1621, Mar. 2012.
[10] W. Li, H. Y. He, X. He, Y. Sun, F. Wang, and L. Ma,
Double step-down DAB converter with additional “Series Asymmetrical Half-Bridge Conveters With Voltage
capacitor is proposed in this paper. The structure of the Autobalance for High Input-Voltage Applications,” IEEE
converter is similar to that of conventional DAB Transactins on Power Electronics, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 3665-
3674, Aug. 2013.
converter. The proposed converter has low voltage
[11] J. Walter, and R. W. D. Doncker, “High-power
stresses across the transformer and switches. The galvanically isolated DC/DC converter topology for future
proposed converter can realize high efficiency under the automobiles,” Power Electronics Specialist Conference,
wide load range as the reduced voltage stress enables the 2003. PESC '03. 2003 IEEE 34th Annual, vol. 1, pp. 27–
converter to operate with wide ZVS range and reduced 32, Jun. 2003.
conduction losses. Proposed converter operates normally [12] Y. H. Abraham, H. Wen, W. Xiao, and V. Khadkikar,
“Estimating power losses in Dual Active Bridge DC-DC
without any transformer saturation even when there is a converter,” IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conversion
mismatch in the duty ratio of the switches. Hence, the Systems(EPECS), 2011 2nd International Converence on,
proposed converter has higher efficiency and is well pp. 1–5, Nov. 2011.
suitable for applications that require isolation and high [13] R. W. De Doncker, D. M. Divan, and M. H. Kheraluwala,
“A three-Phase soft-switched-high-power-density DC/DC
step-down function. converter for high-Power applications,” IEEE Transactions
on Industry Applications, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 63–73, Jan.
1991.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT [14] M. N. Kheraluwala, R. W. Gascoigne, D. M. Divan and E.
D. Baumann, “Performance characterization of a high-
This research was supported by Basic Science power dual active bridge DC-to-DC converter,” IEEE
Research Program through the national Research Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp.
1294–1301, Nov. 1992.
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
[15] G. G. Oggier, R. Ledhold, G. O. Garcia, A. R. Oliva, J. C.
Science, ICT and future Planning (NRF- Balda, and F. Farlow, “Extending the ZVS Operating
2013R1A2A2A01069038) Range of Dual Active Bridge High-Power DC-DC
Converters,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference,
2006. PESC '06. 37th IEEE, pp. 1-7, Jun. 2006.
783
[16] G. G. Oggier, G. O. Garcia, and A. R Oliva, “Modulation
Strategy to Operate the Dual Active Bridge DC-DC
Converter Under Soft Switching in the Whole Operating
Range,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26,
no. 4, pp. 1228–1236, Apr. 2011.
[17] K. Nishijima, K. Harada, T. Nakano, T. Nabeshima and T.
Sato, “Analysis of Double Step-Down Two-Phase Buck
Converter for VRM,” IEEE Telecommunications
Conference, 2005. INTELEC '05. Twenty-Seventh
International, pp. 497–502, Sep. 2005.
[18] A. Rodriguez, A. Vazquez, D. G. Lamar, M. M. Hernando,
and J. Sebastian “Different Purpose Design Strategies and
Techniques to Improve the Performance of a Dual Active
Bridge With Phase-Shift Control,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 790–804, Feb. 2015.
784