Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Alan Hovhaness PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 379
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document appears to be a doctoral dissertation analyzing the musical style and works of composer Alan Hovhaness.

It is a doctoral dissertation analyzing the musical style and works of composer Alan Hovhaness. It discusses his biography, stylistic overview, modality and melody, harmony, counterpoint, rhythm, scoring techniques, and provides analyses of several specific works.

Some of the musical techniques discussed include modality, melody, harmony, harmonic progression, counterpoint, polyphony, rhythm, meter, cycle, conventional scoring, and free-rhythm passages.

.~ _ •• _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ______ , _. •• - __ • • • _. __• ___ • • • - •• _ . _ •• _ " ____ .- ~ __ o _ _ _ .,..-~. ___ •••• _ •• _ . __ • _______ 0._ .• _____ ~ _ _ _ _ ._ .

.I
'

72-20,845 1

ROSNER, Arnold, 1945-


.AN ANALYTICAL SURVEY OF 1HE MUSIC OF ALAN
HOVHANESS. }
1

State University of New York at Buffalo,


Ph.D., 1972
Music

University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan


______. _ - _~_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_. - ____ ____ - ______________I

./

@ 1972

Arnold Rosner

ALL RIGHI'S RESERVED


AN ANALYTICAL SURVEY OF THE MUSIC OF ALAN HOVHANESS

by

Arnold Rosner

A dissertation submitted to the


Faculty of the Graduate School of State
University of New York at Buffalo in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy

February 1972
PLEASE NOTE:

Some pages may have

indistinct print.

Filmed as received.

University Microfilms, A Xerox Education Company


11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE
INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1

I. BIOGRAPHICAL • • • • • • .; • • •
~
• • • •
0 ~ 5
II. STYLISTIC OVERVIEW • • • • • • • • • G .. . .. . 18
III. MODALITY AND MELODY • • • • • • • • • • • ... 38
IV. HARMONY AND HAlU\10NIC PROGRESSION • • • • • • • 69
V. COUNTERPOINT AND POLYPHONY • • • • • • • • • • 103
VI. RHYTHM, METER AND CYCLE • . • • • • • • • • • • 144
VII. SCORING I (CONVENTIONAL) · .. • • • •• • • • • • 178
VIII. SCORING II (FREE-RHYTHM PASSAGES) • • • • • • 212
IX. STRING QUARTET NO.1, OPUS 8 • • .. • • • • • • 251
X. SYMPHONY NO. a "ARJUNA,II OPUS 179 • • • • • • 276
XI. THE FLOWERING PEACH StJITE, OPUS 125 • • • • • 304
XII. FRA ANGELI CO , OPU~ 220 • • • • • .'. .• • • • • 323
XIII. CONCLUSION • e I • • • • • • • • • • '. e· • •• 340
~PPENDIX e ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 346
·CATALOG OF WORKS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 356
1

INTRODUCTION

Alan Hovhaness's music is widely heard and played today,


and has been for at least the last 10 or 15 years. It is also
very plentiful; the catalog of over 300 works included at the
end of this study is probably only a fraction of a total out-
put of which many works are suppressed. Yet, this body of
music has never been the subject of serious scholarly study
from any viewpoint. Hoyhaness's pieces, which are so widely
played by student ensembles, almost never come under analyti-
cal scrutiny in academic spheres. Hovhaness is hardly con-
sidered an important composer, but rather a purveyor of an
inexhaustible supply of easily executed novelties, for vir-
tually any combination of forces.
Although they are novel, Hovhaness's works are hardly
trivial. The techniques used include both old and new, both
Eastern and Western, and the new combinations of composition-
al possibilities would be worthy of study even if the music
were inferior, or the workmanship lacking. But, in fact,
Hovhaness's mastery of his own techniques is thorough adU
fluent, and his best works are remarkably good. Some, in
fact, strike this writer as absolute mas~erpieces, but this
can hardly be proven. Instead the purpose of this disserta-
tion is to put forward the different aspects of Hovhaness's
'musical vocabulary, and to characterize the foundations of
his style and its development over the years of his career
up to the present. Judgments.as to the ultimate value of
specific pieces will not be. attempted, but the author hopes
to justify the proposition that Hovhaness's music is a seri-
ous and in~ortant voice in modern music, and that it 1s orig-
inal and relevant to new composers.
The existing bibliography on Hovhaness consists of record
jacket covers and loosely descriptive. articles in general mag-
azines. The former occasionally present analysis, very fre-
quently provided direct~y by the composer {j An example occurs
as item 3 of the Appendix of this study. The latter include
Simple announcements of premieres and publications, human-
interest stories describing Hovhanessfs voyages to the Orient,
and general descriptions ofo his style and career, almost all
of an introductory character. None, except possibly the last
type, ever say anything about the mus:l.~, and then they merely
present generalities about it. Although there are well over
20 articles to be found in such magazines as Pan Pipes,
Musical America, and even Time, among others, it is no under-
statement to say that to have read anyone of these is to
read them all. There are no scholarly articles or books
dealing with Hovhaness, until the present one. For these
-- reasons, the usual ·bi bliography section is omitted here.
The layout of the study is designed for the clearest
treatment of the various elements elf style, rather than for
encyclopedic study of many indi vidutl.l works. The first chap-
ter is a short biographical summary. The second is a general
3

stylistic picture, including a division of the composer's


work up to about 1970 into four periods. The.ensuing six
chapters each deal with a particular musical component, in-
cluding profuse musical exam:ples, ~'and following the diff'erent
approaches to that stylistic component in the vario~s periods.
The next section comprises to~r chapters. Each is an analysis
of one specific work; the four chapters together include one
work from each of the periodr" In addition, other works are
included if they borrow extensively from the material of the
main work under scrutiny. There is a brief chapter of conclu-
--sion. The appenpix includes three items. The first is a
typical article about Hovhtmess, by James Ringo. It is not
uncomplimentar~f', but full· of generalities and slightly flimsy
judgments. The second i te·Jll is Ct letter from Hovhaness to the
edi tor of the magazine in which item 1 appea.red. It is quite
self-explanatory. The third item is a sample of analytical
notes provided by Hovhaness for a record jacket. Lastly, the
author has attempted to assemble a catalog of Hovhaness's
works. Several different sources were used, and Mr. Hovhaness
himself was of considerable aid, but even so, the dating of
the works is not at all clear, and the list is not presumed
complete. It is, hO\<leYel", certainly the largest and most
nearly chronological catalog of his· music available so far,
being in considerably.better order than the composer's list
of opus numbers, which are at least as illogical as those of
Dvorak, Mendelssohn or Nielsen.
4

It is the author's hope that th1sstudy may change the


image of Hovhaness's music in th~ scholarly community, and
may help to cause his work to be taken as seriously as it
deser~es. Heretofore, the quantity of pieces and performahc~s

has somehow been thought to imply the absence of true quality,


and it is my hope that this b~lief' may be dispelled,. at least
in part, by the present dissertation.
5

CHAPTER I

BIOGRAPHICAL

Hovhaness was born in 1911 in S,?merville, a suburb of


Boston, Mass. His original name was Alan Hovhaness
Chakmakjian, but his mother (ne~ Scott) found the exotic
Armenian sound of th~ family name undesirable. She changed
the name quite early ,to Alan Scott Hovhaness. Hovhaness's
upbringing was conventionally North Am~rican and he was not
interested in his Armenian heritage until the early 40 1 s.
In fact, he was hostile towards it, presumably for the usual
~sychological reasons of motivation to rebel against the pa-
rental traditions. '
Although his father was a professo~ of chemistry,
-'lIovhane'ss's attention was taken up 'by medit~tion and the
arts.' His first attempts at composition were made at age
four, but for some years this interest vied for his attention
with writing and painting. At a.bout age 14 he decided defi-
ni ti vely tow~r,ds music. '-In these years he had already devel-
oped the Oriental and mystical leanings that were important
all his life. He has described (to this author, in conversa-
tion) his romance with the mountains of New England, and his
affection for taking long walks in mountainous areas. He
mentions a strange feeling of oneness with people remote in
time-and place, and a consciousness of being at once in New
England and simultaneously in some distant Asian locale. In
6

his mature life,j he'still attaches high emotional and spiritu- .


..
al symbolic value to mountains" and finds gre~.ter satisfaction
with nature and meditation than with people. It does not ap-
pear that his relationship with hts parents was uncomfortable"
.
but simply that it was strict and practical" thus falli.ng
short of his youthfUl but strong needs for deeper experiences.
His education at the collegiate level began at Tufts
College, but he soon transferred to the New England Conserva-
tory. By the early 1930 ' s his composing was already in full
.swing. He studied with Frederick Converse at New England,
.but.·bis music .. ~e~ms to have gained not so much from composi-
tion lessons as from the disciplines of fugue a.nd orchestra-
·tion.
A very important aspect of Hovhanessts development at
this time was his exposure to Indian music ~hrough musicians
in the Boston area. He was immediately fascinated, and has
remaiued interested in Indian music ever since.
of Indian music were thorough. He eventually became profi-
cient on Indian instruments and learned of Armenian, Japanese
and othe:r exotic styles.. But his interest in Eastern styles
definitely began with Indinn music in the 30's.
One surprising but constant factor of Hovhaness's music
is its practicality and ease of performance. He was in his
youth, and remains still, a capable pianist, a clear and com~

municative conductor and a fluent improviser in many Eastern


and Western styles. He used these' abilit:i.esto support
7

himself in the late 30's and 40's. Despite his musical prac-
ticality, Hovhaness has been dis~inctiy uncomfortable in hu-'
man interactions. He ha.s rema1.ned somewhat of a recluse,
often uneasy with other people. This has manifested itself
both in extreme shyness and outbursts .of annoyance, even
anger. Early performances caused Hovhaness to face critical
scrutiny before he was ready. Rather than simply remaining
insensitive and aloof to reviewers, Hovhaness sometimes ex-
pressed his aggravation directly. For example, in the case
of the Quadruple Fugue of the. String Quartet No.1 (See Chap ...
ter IX), the~omposer was challenged on the fugal structure,
and the legitimacy of the Quadruple Fugue designation during
an open discussion. He became defensive, and proceeded to
go through a complete description of the work's form despite
the fact that the challenger had left the ro.om. His disgust
with critics continued at least through the'late 50's, when
Hovhaness wrote a letter to the ACA magazine to protest com-
ments stating that his music was essentially all of one
piece, and lacldng in harshness or humor. This expression
of aggravation' seems extreme since the critic, James Ringo,
expressed not inconsiderable respect and warmth for the
music in his article.
Hovhaness found himself at a crucial turning point in
1943.. He a'ccepted a scholarship to study at Tanglewood that
summer, where his teache'r was Martinu and where he was in
contact with Copland, Foss and Bernstein. De'spi te the rich
8

beauty of many of the religio~s works he had already written


(such as the Missa Brevis (see Chapter V», Hovhaness was
still not confident of hd.s musical achievements and was
groping for other elements for his musical language. The·~

critical and competitive Tanglewood environment irritated


him. He was able to find t~e communication and friendship
more outside of music than within it.. Literature interested
him, particularly Francis Bacone The visual arts provided
him with the close frie~dship of HYman Bloom. Bloom's artis-
tic circle included one man whose influence on Hovhaness can-
not be overestimated--Hermon diGiovanni, an amateur artist
of a somewhat primitive style. His art was subtle and~ more
important, he was a full-fledged mystic. Hovhaness refers
to him as a "teacher. n DiGiovanni was a man of deep and
probing intellect with, apparently, absolutely no ego at all
and little interest in music. Hovhaness has indicated that
his hesitancy to dedicate one of his works to this man j who
had been so important to his development, was based on ~s

feeling that diGiovanni was above such things. (But Hovhaness


did ultimately dedicate to him one of his favorite works--
also one of his largest--the ·St. Vartan SymphonYG The dedi-
. "cation was made "long after the work was ~ritten and shortly
after diGiovanni's death.) DiGiovanni's interests extanded
to what might normally be termed the occult, and struck sym-
pathetic chords in the mind of Hovhaness who had, as a child~

felt a sense of being at once modern and ancient, at once in


Vermont and Tibet.
9

But while Bloom and diGiovanni providednour1shment and


communication, Bernstein, Copland and Foss, and the whole
Tanglewood communit~ supplied f~~str~tion and disapPointment.
His music was severely criticized, apparently even ridiculed.
Its lack of expected techniques of c~~ssical or even modern
tradition, and the strange aloofness and mysticism of both
music and man were misunderstood.
. .
The result of this summer was a·major self-assessment.
DiGiovanni tried to teach Hovhaness two important points:
. the Oriental self-denial and loss of ego, and the concept of
·continuity of existence. He urged .Hovhaness to discover and
re-establish associations with his ancient Armenian heritage
as a special case of the association of himself with all men,
past and present.
Htovhaness was ripe for these teachings and proceeded to
act on them rather dramatically. Most spectacular was his
decision to discard the majority of his works up to that time.
Apparently he was not dissatisfied wi"th them, though it is
reasonable to assume he could not have held great confldence
in all of them, in view of his clear sensitivity about his
music at that time. Other reasons for thi.s decision range
... -·from the egc.-less to the highly egotistical. DiGiovanni's
ideal of self-denial req~ired a test, as it were, of
Hovhaness's ability to sacrifice his own ego; the destruction
of his music was such a trial. Hovhaness's economic situa-
+'ion in the early 40's was quite poor. He had not achieved
10

the success he might have expected based on the performances


of his SYEPhoBY No.1, and other ~orks, in 1936 and 37Q He
lived in very small quarters, making a mir~mal income from
accompanying and improvising. Th'S' flood of works from his'
pen had created a severe space problem; consequently, this
destruction cleared out space.for living and for new music.
Hovha.ness has told this author that the events of Tanglewood
had led him to feel that the world did not want to he&r his
music and was, in fact., not deserving of it. At any rate,
the destruction that took place was not as complete as has
-been rumored •.. Although he did indeed destroy many works he
simply withdrew others, preserving them either on paper or
in his memory fbr use at a future time. The appearance and
reappearance of pre-1943 music in works with later dat£;s and
apparently later opus numbers leads to considerable confusion
in.the study of the development of Hovhaness's style. Other
early works were allowed to remain in much the same form they
had had.
Touched deeply by diGiovanni~ and the newly-rethought
mystique of his Armenian heritage, Hovhaness proceeded to
study Armenian music and its modes.intensely. He became an
-organist at an Armenian church in Boston and soon began to
turn out works rich in Armenian coloration. He used Armenian
words as titles even though he never became fluent in the
Armenian language. In the music after 1943 Hovhaness con-
tinued to turn away from Western sound even further than in
his early music. Much of the music is entirely without
11

harmonic movement, but new effects of cycles of time and


rhythmic articulation crop up. ~ost important, however, is
that the main character of the early music was not rejected.
The us~ of Western modes and re11giouseffects as well as .
many mannerisms of melody, harmony, scoring and rhythm, are
common to the music before and after 1943.
Hovhaness's life was uneventfUl for the remainder of
the 40's. In daily routine, except for the new Armenian in-
rluences, it did not differ greatly from the time before 1943.
Around 1950 he began to achieve a substantial measure
of reputation~. ~s works were performed by important perform-
ers, such as StokOl'lski, and many achieved publication. MGM
records issued performances of several works •. Popular inter-
est in folk and Eastern music became widespread in the 50's,
and Hovhaness' s music attained ne1-'! respect •. Exposures led to
more exposures, and his reputation snowballed. He joined the
staff of the New England Conservatory, where his duties in-
cluded regular conducting assignments. He seems not to have
taken to teaching. Once he achieved sufficient reputatJon
to support himself as a composer, he gave up teaching. In
the early 50's his style broadened, triggered by the demand
for his music, his new stature, and, presumably, by the play-
ing out of the long Armenian infatuation.
As I shall detail in the next chapter, his music of the
early 50's includes not ·only stylistic traits of his earlier
music, and the Armenian influences, but also 'several new
12 .

trends. Confronted·with what must ·have seemed an embarrass-


ment of commissions and requests for works~ he procee~ed to .
write at tremendous speed==faster even than tds rapid earlier
rate. Among well-known modern co~osers, only Milhaud and,
Villa-Lobos seem to have exceeded him'for sheer speed of pro- '
duction. One may~ however, make reservations,· some of which
.might apply to any modern or paRt composer in a similar situa-
tion. To begin with~ Hovhaness seems never to have turned
down a commission. Conditioned by years of poverty and ob-
scurity he may never. have been able to escape the notion that
each per~ormance, each commission~ even each dollar might be
th~ last one. Or, the commissions may have come too fast to
give him any tifIle to think. At any rate, Hovhaness readily
admits that certain'of his works we~e written very rapidly
and are not up to tbp. quality of other wo~ks. Hovhaness's
execution of these commissions--the term is.used loosely
here to refer to any work written for any person or founda-
tion on request--was sometimes as fast as within one day.
Some of the works are new and valuable, but more often one
of two situations occurs. Either the work is merely an exe-
cution of certain of his techniques ·by formula or else it
borrows extensively from pre-existing works~ which may have
been quite well thought. out and not hastily composed. Both
of these procedures are not without precedent, especially in
the Baroque era where t~ey were quite normal.
One may here make the remark that Hovhanessis output !s
13

not of uniformly high qual1ty. Perhaps more uniform quality


could have been achieved if less had been written. Whereas
many Romantic and modern composers might find this a sign of
low artistic integrity or simply lack of inspiration, those
of the Renaissance, Baroque and Rococ~ periods would probably
not have been at all disturbed by it.· The remark that the
output i.s of lesser overall qaality than it might be if there
were less of it is probably as correct for Lassus, Handel,
Bach, Mozart and Haydn, as it is of Hovhaness or Villa-Lobos
·or Milhaud. Hovhaness's tendency to write just about anything
on order has continued throughout tp.e 50's and 60's. ·For ·ex-
ample, late in the 60 1 s, he composed a work using recordings
of the sounds of whales, writing two versions when it turned
out the commissioning individual disliked the first one. The
initial attempt was not "light" enough. At the premier of
the work Hovhaness was frank to admit he greatly preferred
the suppressed version, yet did not feel· inclined to publish
either one, considering the music relatively weak. One won-
der~ why he went through with the commission in the first
place. For all his disdain for individuals, and despite mys~

tical predilections, Hovhaness is a true "gebrauchmusiker."


He considers it not only right and artistic, but also chal-
lenging and enriching, to handle, even with less than excel~

lent musical resu.l ts j 8,lmost 8:ny proposition offered to him


along these lines.
By the mid-50's, Hovhaness's success was considerable.
14 .

Several performers and recording groups~ notably. at MGM~

brought many of his works to lis~eners. Critics~ though


hardly unanimous in praise~ included many staunch champions
ofhib work, and certainly all agreed on the individualit~~

of his style and the ri(~h beauty of at least some of the


specific works. Interestingl~~ Hovhaness's feelings towards
humanity have not mellowed. He seems still to be more moved
by mountains and civilizations than indi"riduals. With im-
provement of his circumstances he has travelled widely.
India, Hawaii, Kore~, Japan and Switzerland are some of the
··locales he ha~. v~sited, and each had a reasonably extensive
influence on either his music or the routine of his life.
For example, he· set up a home in Lucerne where. he is now
living. Ironically his Armenian works were accepted in India.
Many works of the 40's were given new Indian titles (Arjuna,
and the Madras Sonata). Seeing India nourished his interest
in Indian music. "Raga" and "tala" designs~which do occur
in earlier works, become more prevalent after visits to India.
Meanwhile, the visits to Japan and Korea led to new tendencies
in orchestration, formal juxtapositions of severe contrasts,
and a general revitalization of his 'striving in music toward
.vision and revelation. Th~ works of Hovhaness since the
beginnings of his travels thus reflect kaleidescopic changes
of national and cultural leanings within his main style.
This has led to varied reactions, ranging from the opinion
that his music is mere imitation of venerable traditions,
15

changing as periodically as fashions in c1oth:tng or other .


trivial matters" to the opinion that he is a rare man whose
ndnd and art encompasses the whole of the world with all its
traditions and prayers. •

In the 60's, in addition to purely musical developments,


we find the emergence of 1ite~ary productions as well. It
1s questionable whether he began writing at this :point or
whether he had been writing for a long time without publica-
tion.
A~ any rate, discounting ~imp1e prose, which doe~, how-·
ever, show interesting 1inguistical peculiarities, Hovhaness's
word output has been in two areas--independent poems,. and
texts fOl' his oWn works. His opera librettos are particular-
ly interesting. As in the music, one finds a blending of
Eastern and Western ideas of poetry and theatreo In two
works, Pilate and The Leper King) the hero (title role in
each case) is a man of great individuality and herOism, anal-
ogous to the lonely artist in that he is misunderstood and
ultimately hated by the other characters in the works. In
view of the scars of Hovhaness1s earlier career, it· seems
possible that these works may represent somewhat autobiograph-
- -ical ·conceptions.
An interesting sample of poetry occurs not as a text but
as ~oetic companion to a musical work, Ko-Ola-U, for four-
hand piano. The entire poem reads as follows:
16

To the Ko-Ola-U Mountains


-Sacred light
On endless ocean",
Sacred mist
On mountain pyramid,
POinting ever "upward.
For a million years;
Island Gods stood
On rain-filled volcanos,
On waterfalls,
On flaShing rainbows,
Wandered over endless ocean.
For one moment,
His proud moment,
Arrogant man,
Earth-conqueror,
Earth-destroyer,
. -Looks on his pale self,
Sees no mountains,
No mist, no rainbo\-lSi,
No light on ~ndless ocean.
Poor momentary man,
Sees no eternal one.
Among other conclusions that derive from this poem is
the idea, inherent in" the final lines, that perhaps, for all
his multi-cultural, and sometimes eloquent affirmation of
divinity in his l'lorks, Hovhaness, as a man, may not quite
have achieved the complete sureness of belief in a supreme
being, and in ~~s own work, that he has apparently been
searching for. Notable approaches throughout his life include
--his early -mountain-fixation, the diGiovanni teachings and rev-
elations of 1943, and the musical and other experiences of
his travels" abroad which have in some ways the character of
pilgrimages to the Far East. This may explain the size of
his output, the use of many different technical and cultural
17

.elements of vocabulary and the dissatisfaction with man and


. ·sometimes with his own music. All may represent a voracious'
appetite for new" and
.
ultimately just. barely u.nsuc~essfu1
avenues by which to reach God. What is curious is that de-
spite the incompleteness of the expe~ience for Hovhaness him-
self" his music has provided" with different types of pieces·
reaching different types of listeners" some of the most di-
rect and clear music of religious faith and serenity ever
written" to many ears in both East and West •.
In the succeeding chapters" I shall investigate this
"music more thoroughly" though in vi.ew of the size of the
. .
musical corpus involved, a complete work-for-work dossier
will not be attempted; this is less important than a thorough
study of the style. The next chapter will be concerned with
a general description of the style and a division of the out-
..
put into periods. The ensui.ng several chapters will be de-
voted one each to different components of musical vocabulary.
Finally" four chapters will be given over each to specific
works for careful analysis.
18

CHAP'l,'ER II

STYLISTIC OVERVIEW

r.· ..
Hovhaness's work up to the late 60's may be di;dded into
four periods. These have certain definite common traits but
also some distinctive indiv1dualcharacteristics. They are
probably more clearly differentiable than the periods in
stylistic divisions of other composers' l'10rks. The process
. of differentiation is somewhat complicated by Hovhaness's
tendency to use and re-use material conceived at one time in
work~ of a later time.

The Periods: General


The changes from one periud to another are punctuated
by biographical events, which in turn seem to have produced
changes in musical outlook. The terminal year of the first
period is 1943. The events of Tanglewood that summer, the
crucial meeting with Hermon diGiovanni, and the subsequent
destruction of many works, clearly mark the onset of the sec-
ond period. We will refer to the ~econd period as n Armenian"

because of the impact on his own music of his study of


-.Armenian music and culture. Naturally, the period has other
attributes as well.
The third period begins at some point in the early 50's,
but there does not appear to be a very clear border point"
The st. Vartan Symphony of 1950, the largest of the Armenian
works, may' mark the end of the full sway of that preoccupation
19

but important works thoroughly within that style coexist with


·other works in the ensuing two years. Important examples in-
clude Khaldis, Arevakal and Talin, concerti for piano with
brass and percussion, orc~estra, and viola with strings, re-
spectively.
The third period is one of expansion and consolidation.
It includes many revision~ and recompqsitions of work~ of the
first period, bringing into full stride Hovhaness's tendency
of profusely using old ideas in new works. There is less ori-
entation to national styles; several types are used but none
of "them seems to predominate in away that controls the devel-
opment of the period. It may be Hovhaness's most varied
period. It subsume~ the two that precede it, and includes
I
new trends, some of which make a basis for aspects of the
fourth period.. Others are stylistic "roads not takenll "\-lith
no apparent compositional progeny. For instance, a strange
sparse style--the closest in sound of any of Hovhaness's work
·to the central European serial school--occurs in chamber and
piano pieces in the early 50's, side-by-side with particular-
ly direct and consonant music. Examples exist where these
extremes occur as adjacent sections in the ·same work, such
-as in the two parts of the last movement,of Flowering Peach
(see Chapter XI) or between the first two movements and the
third movement of the brief Duet for Violin and Harpsichord.
The music of the Far East, particularly Japan, dominates
the fourth period. 'The study and concert trips to Asia
around 1960 coincide with the musical shift of emphaSis in
20 .

. that direction. The a'tmospheric Koke No Niwa, revised in


~960 before a major Korean excursion~and the.barbaric
Symphony No.7, "Nanga Parvat" are among the first works of
this period. The Symphony, written in 1959, is not as much·
Japanese as Himalayan or Tibetan (the title is the name or a
Himalayan mountain) but in it~ percussiveness it represents
a departure from other works, even of Indian persuasion, that
precede it.
There are certain important similarities between these
styles. Primary is that of outlook. Virtually every work of
---Hovhaness is.~~l~gious or "visionary" in intention. In cer-
tain \t;rorks this takes on a rather dark character, but this is
still entirely in harmony with Eastern religio\1s.and mystical
thought. While Hovhaness's techniques vary between character-
istically western and characteristica.lly Eastern devices, the
aesthetic purposes are more often similar td those of Eastern
al't.
This has certain very definite implications. Tonality,
with its clarity of progreSSion, directness of motion and
leading-tone ·me1odic character~ lends itself least well to
the kind of aesthetic where ind:t vidual events are more im-
.portant for their own beauty than their direction and where
the general effect intended is relatively static. But exact-
ly this aesthettc is dictated by Eastern art. Although to-
nality is not appropriate, Hovhaness's tastes lend themselves
to definite pit~hes, melodic movement and clear harmony_
21

Hence, his· music is almost exclusively modal. This does not


·-necessarily mean diatonic modes. The types ofmodes--Western,
Eastern or hybrid--represent one point of distinction between
the perioCls. In any case, chroma.ticism, with its quasi-tonal
implications, is very rare outside of. the first period· where
it sometimes occurs in passing motion, e.g.:

Ex~~. String Quartet No. I (1935)

A second point of importance concerns Hovhaness's forms.


As one would expect, forms associated with tonal music and
related to such music aesthetically are not natural to
H6vhaness's thought. Sonata forms, forms dependent upon mo-
tivic development, Be ethovene sque formal and·tonal architec-
ture axe largely absent from Hovhaness's.works. He has great
admiration for the symphonic styles of Mozart and Haydn.
(In'one work, ·the Symphony No.3, he has paid a deliberate
homage to them specifically through the use of characteristic
classic structure.) However, this is generally the aspect of
Classic-Romantic musical st·ylemost foreign to his usage. On
the other hand, there is an abundance of many different kinds
of fugues and canons, with textural trappings of Ba~Jque and
Renaissance style. old dance form:, particularly· very old
ones, such as the estampie, OCCUZ", as well as Armenian and
22

Oriental forms such as tapor, jhala, etc. Also, whole sec-


tions of pieces sometimes develop out of textural devices, as
they do in jazz or certain Eastern music. Simple block-
chordal declamations, broken only 'by aria-like melodic sugges-'
tions, comprise the entire first movement of Mysterious
, ,

Mountain (SyrrWhony No.2). Antiphonal writing, in a style


reminiscent of a Baroque concerto or concerto grosso, high-
lights movements of works in the second period, including the
impressive opening movement of Zartik Parkim. In later works,
,whole sections are derived from rhythmic or arhythmic gener- .
ating devices to be discussed further in_Chapters VI and VIII.
In summarY3 one may say that the only forms n2i included in
Hovhaness's arsenal are those characteristic Germanic-tonal
forms of motivic development associated ~dth the symphonic
style from Haydn through Brahms.
Allied,with these points, one finds Hovhaness's works'
missing the key changes of other composers. As I will point
out in a later chapter, he often has very effective harmonic
movements of a more or less chromatic nature~ but these pro-
gressions are not designed for modulation to another key_
Instead they appear simply for the beauty of the harmonic
effect. Also worth noting is that unlike Western composers
since the Renaissance, Hovhaness prefers to avoid modal cen-
ters and vQcabularies necessitating elaborate key signatures
or more accidentals than necessary_ This is not to suggest
any mode is avoided to circumvent accidentals', but simply
22

that such a mode would be used in a tr&~sposition t~at mini=


mizes such complications. This is the case always for whole
'works, and also largely for
, . except whare internal
sections~

sections~involve a complex signature due to their situation


relative to the prevailing key. Sign~tures are used fre-
quently where quasi-di~tonic modality is in effect, but sig-
natures of more than two sharps or flats are fairly rare •
..Exceptions include cases where t\,lO si·multaneous parts in dif-
ferent keys have equally elaborate signatures, say four flats
,against four sharps. Any transposition of the music would
cause one of the voices to have even more than four acciden-
tals. A last curious point, in this regard, is that there
is a predilection for the centers A and F. The latter ac-
counts for some instances of four-flat Signatures that would
be unexpected based on the foregoing.
The catalog of Hovhaness's opus' numbers can be quite
misleading; r~ferring to it alone mdght lead one to think
the four periods are actually four different stylistic com-
plexes coexisting throughout his career. Many works were
worked on at different times; these often point up the dif-
ferences in periods 'most clearly. Othar works with early
opus numbers were written much later. Some works with late
opus numbers are based on mlch earlier works, which, in turn,
may appear ,in the catalog on their O\'tn or may have been re-
jected or even destroye,d in their original form.
23

The First Period (c. 1930-1943)


Study of the first period is more difficult than the
others because so much was destroyed. It is difficult even
to get a general idea of what works it comprised. Several
symphonies were discarded; the present. catalogue includes
but one early symphony and the period seems richest in short .
works for modest forces. There are many surviving songs.
Most works have the religious content· which perv~des the ma-
jority of the output. Christian influences coexist with
~ersian and Indian ones. The predilection of counterpoint
.i s already in evidence; Baroque fo~s' with . early Baroque or
Renaissance ~armony predominate. Little of this music seems
influenced by Romantic or Western aesthetics; all of it
attempts a certain mystical elevation.
It is important to mention the misconception that
'Hovhaness's'first
.
period is essentiaily different
.
in purpose
and vocabulary from the rest of his works. The destruction
of these works, as mentioned in Chapter I, was not a result
of d~ss.atisfaction, and was only partially a result of new
stylis~ic ideas. In a sense, it was a sign of revelation,
of sacrifice, or a quasi-Oriental removal from self. The
,
. following two passages show. just how similar certain stylis-
tic procedures of these first tl'10 periods can be:
24

Ex. 2. Alleluia and Fu~e (1940)

Ex •. 3. 30th Ode of Solomon (1948)

'''-'--The Second Period (1943-c. ~950).

There are diffe·rences between the first and second


periods, as one would expect in view of the dimension of the
biographical events of 1943. These inc1ude·severa1 that fur-
ther remove the music from Western articulation towards a
less harmonic and'climactic texture. The intense study of
Armenian culture led to changes in preferred modal structures.
These comprise both changes of emphasis within diatonic and
pentatonic modes and non-diatonic additions, many of which
lead to major-minor effectse
A motoric Byzantine-Baroque sound materializes in scoring
. emphasizing brass and piano, in repeated .drone figures, in
abrupt non-climactic endings, and in counterpoint that is
less fugal and more canonic than that of the earlier period.
In the· first period contrapuntal entrances are at intervals
suggestive of classical fugal practice; in the second there
25

are many canons at the unison, as well as a number of poly~

tonal canons. These lead to more static than progressive


harmony.
Very important are two essentially rhythmic innovations,
somewhat related and most perceptible to the listen~r in
colorful e~fects of orchestration. The first of these, the
use of cycles, is related both to Indian musio and to con-
cepts of astronomy. It associates
.
with a given instrumental
'.

part of a number of pUlses, usually prime, and almost never


a simple multiple of 2 or 3. This instrument's part has a
---pattern of mu~ic" possibly including rests or repetitions,
of exactly that length~ The pattern is repeated throughout
• 0

the section; ito constitutes a cycle whose period is given by


its number of pulses. The simplest patterns involve the
attack of just one note; frequently cycles for cymbals or
gongs are of this type. The parts playing in cycles are, of
course, entirely determined and written out. As a rule, in-
o struments playing cycles use numbers which have few common
divisors--in particular the case where they are relatively
prime is frequent. In the latter instance, the parts never
coincide in quite the same way until enough time has elapsed
__ 0 _to comprise as many .beats as the product of the cyclic num-
bers. In practice the passage is not actually long enough
for the cycles to coincide in the same way more than once.
Additional complexity is' added by the meter of o
ar~

non-cyclic
parts, 't'ihich generally have few common divisors with any of
26

the cyclic parts.


Cyclic passages abound in the second period. ,Although
they continue to be an important device, their use falls off
slightly thereafter. By contrast the second rhythmic-color-
istic device to originate in this period gained importance
- ,

throughout the ensuing years ~nd became a major characteris-


tic of the fourth period. This is the technique referred to
as "freely buzzing," II free-rhythm, " , "controlled chaos" and
by several other descriptive names. It is characterized by
the assignment to apart 'of a pattern of notes to be played
----quictly over and- over again, rapidly but not coordinated with
other parts, or with other players within the same part. The
resulting vertical combinations are not strictly controlled,
but restricted sufficiently by the patt~rns given. The aim
is to give an indefinite colorful blur or a definite harmonic
and modal color. Although there are' recognizable general
melodic contours which emerge from the texture, the technique
provides a complex but essentially static drone of tone-color
and pitches. This purpose is defeated if rhythmless music is
given to only one player. Where the passages occur'as accom-
paniments to other music, a small number is sufficient as
--long as it is enough to avoid any one part being too audibly
definite~ When the passages occur as the main music, either
with no other parts or where the other parts are the accom-
paniment, a larger body and variety i~ used.
In the second period, rhythmless texture is used largely
27

..
as accompaniment. The string instruments are most often a~-

signed this job. Passages that ~o not act as.accompaniments


are 'exclusively for strings. The composer seems to associate
certain metaphysical and spiritua2 properties with these pas-
sages, as witness this example of 1950 with the composer's
own verbal description:

Ex. 4. St. Vartan Symphony

n Spiri t Sounds n repeat an'd repeat infinite no.


of times, not together, some faster, some slower,
murmur. II .

It is interesting to note a very similar musical figure in a


much later work--l962--with a different verbal description:

Ex. 5. Wind Drum

II Repea.t and repeat., not together, confused sounds. II

Rhythmless passages in the second period are not very


different from each other" Conventional music occurs between
any two rhythroless passages. In subsequent works, one
28

rhythmless passage is sometimes followed immediately by


another. In this period, and to some degree later as well,
rhytbmless passages involve a grand symmetrical crescendo-
decrescendo scheme, beginning and.'ending pp or ppp, and
peaking as high as fff~ The accompaniment passages, appro-
priately, are quieter and less varied in dynamics.
With this Armenian phase of his development, Hovhaness's
use of texture takes on a multi-planar quality, characterized
by t'one-color differentiation of one mode, meter or textural
. design from another~ In many passages, for example~ one can
find percussion parts in cycles wi~hcelesta and Vibraphone
adding dissonant If pOints of sound" in their characteristic
co10rs$ while strings and brass have two different canons in
two or more keys and rhythms.
However the period still includes passages of modal
..
'counterpoint suggestive of the first period. Hovhaness often
writes.heterophonic passages of melody with accompaniment of
a generally consonant nature and lacking textural complexi-
ties or rh~thmic devices. This passage, from Varak (1944),
:ror violin and piano, is characteristic of the second period·
in its major-minor effects and melodic features such as that
bracketed as x; harmonically, the same passage with its tri-
adic vocabularly and consecutive fifths, would as '\'1ell char-
acterize certain pieces, in particular those of a "prelude"
nature, of the first p~riod:
29

A last cl:taracteristic of this period is Hovhaness' s in.-


.. terest in dance, march and processi.onal like numbers.·
Hovhaness's favorite Western composer is Handel, and one de-
tects a common trait of virile celebration in certain works
where the composer attempts to write ·music at once joyful and
rhythmic and still serious and religiously devout.

The Third Period (1950 I s).


The third period comprises many factors, including those
of the first two periods. Many works of the 50's include
--passages originally concei 'fed in the· first period--some used
from memory of scores which had been destroyed in the early
40's. Consequently, it is sometimes hard to distinguish
materials taken from older works from newly-composed music
which ·represents only stylistic references to older periods.
The small-scale works surviving from the first period
and the spirited concertante textures of the .second now 9~eld
to richer sonorities. In this and the next period, there are
30

manyorc~estral works, includ~ng numerous symphonies. This


tendency is follow'ed not only in new works but in the naming
and numbering of symphonies actually composed earlier but
not necessarily symphonic in conct:!ption. The 8th and 9th-sym-
phonies (Arjuna and st. Vartan, respectively) date from the
Armenian period and Sinfonia Concertante probably is a more
appropriate title for either of them. No.2 (Mysterious
Mountain) uses some materials from the first period, as do
sections of No.6 (Celestial
, Gate). But the use of the title
"symphony" iS,as significant a pointer towards a new interest
----in'-formal and orchestral grandeur of conception as the com-
position of the newer symphonies, 3, 4, 5 and 7.
The third period coincides chJ:lonolv~~ically with
Hovhaness's rise to popularity. Hence, there are many works
l'lri tten on commission or request. The composer produced many
pieces in remarkable haste. Several piano works and the
short Duet for Violin and Harpsichord were written each in
the space of one day" In some of these works "Ie can detect
the sparse atMospheric style pursued only briefly by
Hovhaness and possessing affinities both with Eastern rrMsic
and vlebernian developments. "
Hovhaness's choice of modal vocabul~ry widened in this
period. Indian raga-like modes, diatonic modes', major-minor
modes and Armenian modes are all present at various times,
-whereas in the earlier periods one or two of these types pre-
dominate. Harmonically a corresponding e.n.:!.argement is per-
31

Not only is greater dissonance employed but tri-


adic passages now conta1n more chromatic connections. Pro-
gressions such as:

Ex. 7. Magnificat

1'~-$iI9!1~~!j 1'1~ I
• tli1IXli I JjJ~I-
from the Magnificat (19~7)" l'Tere not frequent earlier. In.
~he above passage note the parallel voice-leading, which is
sometimes allied with more chr'omatic harmony in this period.
(The parallels are" in fact, present within one vocabulary
or another in all periods of Hovhanessis writing but rarely
at length.) The use of ~ chords often occurs in chordal
writing from the 1950 l s on.
The cyclical and rhythmless schemes of the second period
are exposed to greater variety of instrumentation in the third
although the complex juxtaposition of cycles of the most in-
volved second period works is absent. Chamber pieces have
sections entirely built on cyclic patterns". which Hovhaness
now eXplicitly likenB to "orbitsl! as in astronomy. Rhythm-
less passages now include percussion or chorus as well as
strings. Still" full orchestral passages don't occur, the
winds are relatively little used" and the general crescendo •••
decrescendo ••• pattern o~ dynamics applies most of the time.
32

Successive rhythmless passages remain infrequent; the occa-


sional instances that do occur involve consecutive passages
with different orchestral groups.
The complex polyphony of the polymodal canons of th~

second period is not present in abundance in the third period.


There are a number of neo-modal fugues, but many are actually
recompositions of pieces dating from· the first period. There
is, in fact, a waning of interest in polyphonic writing, al-
though l'le do find neo-o;-gana in the Magnificat, brief neo-
Renaissance non-imitative polyphony in the Christmas Ode and
·---some·-1Ilore ·dissonant·contrapuntal devices in the ··piano and
chamber l'lorks. The· slackening of interest in counterpoint is
made up for by a new interest in texture and the counterpoint-·
ing of texture and orchestral color. Hovhaness's verbal de-
scriptions of many passages include phrases like "scattered
sounds," "points of sound," etc. The role of tuned percus-
Sion, celesta and harp, often in cycles and dissonant to
other parts, increases in this period.

--"heFourth Period -(1960's)


The fourth period is most strongly characterized by t'\lTO
related though quite distinct developments. The first is a
movement towarqs the use of Far Eastern models. The second
is a growth of dealings '\IIi th dark, one might even say ugly,
emotions and sounds. This element had occurred rarely in
earlier workS, but becomes frequent" even prevalent, nOl'l.
M<?reover, it is an epic darkness--complex, heavy, aggressive
33

in scoring'and dynamics.
Full-scale melodies are present and very important--the
lines are referred to as IIheroic themes" II and a.re wide and
grim, exploiting larger skips than in earlier works and em-
phasizing outlines of dissonant inter~als. This is not ex-
clusive and certain works such as Praise the Lord with
Psaltry are more consonant, technic~lly and emotionally. But
even this work uses one of the heavy ,and intense IIheroic
themes," one found also in Fra Angelico (see Ex. 2 of Chapter
,XII) and has moments where effects of richness and splendor
--derive in part from textural thickn,ess and dissonance.
The prevalent counterpoint in the fourth period is canon-
ic but rarely polymodal. Most canons are at the unison" and
involve melodic lines rich in stepwise motion and figuration"
leading to very closely packed vertical alignment. Many
·cluster-like sounds result from this kind of counterpoint"
and they usually resolve into unisons. In general" harmonic
movement is slower and more static" and considerable disson-
ancE7 is employed, frequently in long "pedalll-like chords.
The pedal chords are sometimes clarified for the hearer by
attacking the notes one at a time, holding all of them when
.the "Thole chord accumulates. The opposite procedure is some-
times used to end a pedal-chord passage. In some works, fre-
quent use is made of the pedal chord built up of the vertical-
ization of the mode be~ng used.
The modes employed at this time are less often diatonic
34

than before. Indian and Japanese modal flavors are culti-


vated. The modal usage is sometimes very strict. In Wind
~ (1962), for example, the entire work, about half an hour
of music, uses only six tones--the mode A-B-C-Db-E-F#. The
earlier music includes instances restricted to very few notes
but they are usually part of a diatonic or othe~qise simple
mode, and are fairly brief, often con~aining foreign notes
in the accompaniments. However, there is a common thread in
that both procedures ar~ harmonically static.
The chordal pedals serve a purpose similar to rhythmless
---passages, -and in --some instances replace the latter where one
might otherwise expect to find them. Sometimes multiple
string divisi passages include both-pedal chords and ampli-
fying rhythmless parts. The rhythmless idea is carried very
far in the fourth period. It is used both alene and as ac-
companiment. In the latter case the effects are often ag-
gressively heterogeneous--multi-planar rather- than character-
istic of smooth accompaniment. Ins trum.ents used for rhythm-
less passages are without restriction. The winds are included~

and the brass, in particular, emphasized, especially in cli-


maxes. Sometimes several different orchestral bodies have
free-rhythm music assigned to them at th~ same time, either
homogeneously or heterogeneously, depending on the rela.ti ve
dynamic patterns and the pitch figurations. For extended
-sections, rhytbmless passages may follow one another, with
or -'\'lithout overlap •. In one work, the Symphony No. 19,
·35

nvishnu,n the free-rhythm sections "are" the work--other


music exists to punctuate and sep.arate, and occasionally to
lend contrast of atmosphere. This reverses ~he apparently
more natural roles of free-rhythm-and conventional passages
in earlier works. Whereas, earlier rhythmless passages made
t.heir point through their very existence and were reasonably
similar to one another, here a great variety of sounds is
created by the one technique. Hovhaness achieves this vari-
ety by careful design of the patterns, by novel combinations
of sonorities and by clever combinations of dynamics.
"Perhaps .mor~ than any -other aspect of Hovhaness l s style,
the rhythmless technique may raise questions. To a detractor,
it seems a rather superficial trick and a common. denominator
depriving works of individual identity due to their similar
recourse to this style e A defense of the pra~tice '\'lOuld be
best formulated at the fourth period, despite the much great-
er abundance of its use there. In tbis period the composer
demonstrates that each rhythmless passage can in fact be very
different and striking. Far from acting as a convenient com-
mon denominator of musical identities of different works,
this technique can lend works, such 'as the "Vishnu" Symphony,
·thevery essence and. individuality of their musical identity.
An obvious far-Eastern trait prevalent· in this period is
the ~rofuse use of glissandi, used alike in simply melodic,
polyphonic, and rhythmle'ss music. This leads to new promi-
nence for certain instruments. Timpani glissandi, occasional
36

in the third period; are frequent in the fourth.. String glis-


andi" are used" and even the wood?Tinds are required to ubend ll
tones as much as possible" in slow passages with notes of
convenient length. Trombones especially become important--
their slide capability gives them a new leadership in the
brass family. (Hovhaness has .strongly demanded instit~tion

of slide trumpets in common usage although he .has never ac-


tually called for them in his scores.)
Before proceeding to close technical analyses of musical
components in the next six chapte.rs" I refer once again to
the -common· sp~:ri~ual purpose ·so essential to -all of Hovhaness I s
music. Many of his works use the word "Mountain" in their
titles" and the'word is also found in many of Pis verbal de-
scriptions of his works. The crescendo-decrescendo d3uamics
of cyclic and rhythmless passages are clearly mountain-like;
less clearly so are the religious fugues and arias. Another
favorite term is "giant·melody." By contrast to the detailed
microcosmic worlds of vlebern and the Bartok quartets"
Hovhaness strives broadly towards the macrosocosmic" or" more
simply" the cosmic. He has shown us that this area·of expres-
sion is wider than we might at first· suspect" but it is still
. exclusive of many things. Before any technical evaluation
is made" one might first 2iken the composer to a mountain-
climber--not a bad analogy in general" but unusually appro-
priate in this case. It· will meet with general agreement
that a technical examination of a mountain cllmber is ess€n-
37

tially meaningless as against the question of how formidable


·the peak is and what degree of spiritual elevation is achieved
at the summit.
38

CHAPTER III

MODALITY AND -MELODY

The melodic language of lIovhanessls music is closely


tied to his modal VI -;abularies. In certain -works not only
the notes of the mode but their scalar order lend character
to melodic material. This brings Hovhaness close to Indian
music. In fact, melody is probably-one of the main ways in
which his music has affiruties with the Eastern music that
has captured his attention throughout his career.

General Melodic Traits: Melody


in the First Period
In general stepwise motion predominates to a consider-
ably greater extent than in most other music. Sometimes it
-is unclear exactly what a step means. In c~rtain closely-
packed modes diminished thirds occur, whereas-augmented sec-
onds are frequent in more open modes. However, Hovhaness,
as a rule, is careful in his spelling, which means that in-
'~ervals spel~e~ as seconds are consecutive notes within the
modal vocabulary in effect. The ens~ng example, from the
first period (1937), opens in a manner suggestive of later
works, with a characteristic augmented second in the first
bar. In fact, if 1'1e refer to the rest of the passage, it
1'10uld seem that the C# is better spelled as Db, but even at
this early stage, Hovhaness is thinking of the augmented sec-
ond effect. The rest of the example, devoted almost entirely
39

'.
to chromatic scale, 'is typical only of the first period;
thereafter, modal vocabularies lead to exclusion of at least
some notes of the chromatic scale.

·fPl '.'
, Ex. 1. Symphony No. 1 ..'.
.•f

I II .. . I
j~ J~:J ~.
; =. 4£Ow "..~
~...

·t\;;rize Hovhan(3ss.'s melodic material in all periods and modal


vocabularies. To a very great extent, Hovhaness favors melo-
dies which begin directly on the first beat of. the measure.
This is true even if the melody opens with shorter note values
and proceeds to apparently stronger held notes. In fact,
shorter values ge'nerally do precede longer ones. Many sec-
tions, especially in the later periods, beg:J.n 01' end 1'11 th th~

proclamation figure "f


, (e.g., the. ending of the Fa.nta~j:?
on Japanese "Woodprints) which also occurs in Hungarian music
and the works ,of Sibelius~ Figures such as the fifth through
eighth bars of Ex. 1 1·;~.cre a series of short notes precede a
long one predoillinate over the opposite' version: J,--.~Idd
in all periods.
Also typical is the articulation of A as the "tonic" of
the passage, by the preponderance of time devoted to it,
especially bars 2 and l{.. The a.ugmented second figure C#-Bb-A
40

of bar 1 helps to establish it. Fl'om .then on, its supremacy


depends on the long notes in bars 2, 4, 5 and 8. As men-
tioned above, stepWise motion predomlnates--in this case ex-
clusiyely, after the diminished 4·th interval of the third bar.
A corollary of this is the narrow range of the melody as a
whole. Wider ranges are used more in later periods, though
the access to widely spaced notes is often gr~dual if not
strictly stepwise. Also characteristic is a general legato
character of sustained ·smoothness. Hovhaness generally ad-
heres to this style of phraSing, although, particularly in
works of percussive character, other methods of attack are
employed.

For the most part, the first period makes use of dia-
---tonic modes" Chromaticism such as Ex. 1 occurs with only.
. .
moderate frequency even i~ this period and appears less a~d

less as the composer's own idea of his individual melodic


·~anguage crystallizes. This may account for examples which
---open with more varied interval structures and then resort to
chromaticism, such as Ex. 1. An interesting examples occurs
in the first version of the Opus 6 Toccata and Fugue, of 1936 •
. Most of the writing uses simple chromatic figures as in Ex. 1,
but the very opening of this work for the piano is remark-
able for its. containing several dp.finite traits of the com-
poser's more refined·sty1e.:
. Ex. 2

The example suggests the Lydian mode on F#; later on


Hovhaness would choose a diffe~ent k~y signature to simplify
the notation. The excerpt starts on the do~mbeat, although
many listeners might feel the second or third beat as strong-
er than the first. The rhythm clear~y conforms to the pre-
. .
ferred design of shorter notes preceding longer ones; the
bar consists of two consecutive instances of short-short-long,
..
where the first short note is stressed. In particular, the
quick figure of the second half of the bar is important,
"-rhythmically at least, to many "lorks of ensuing periods. The
firs~ period is rich in ~~gal writing;, so further reference
will be made to its melodies, in the form of fugal subjects,
in Chapter V.
-In- the first period, to -summarize, melodies seem to be
0f three types: a. Clearly diatonic modal material, much
in line with Western Renaissance music; b. Chromatic scalar
material, such as in Ex. 1; c. Material'more suggestive of
the rhythmic and modal peculiarities of later Hovhaness, such
as Ex. 2.
other elements of melodic style that seems to pervade
most of his output include the follo,\,ling:
42

1. Where diatonic modes.are employed, modes with minor


third are preferred to those witp major third.
2. The sixth degree of moC~~--particu1ar1y when it is
a minor 6th--is an important turning point of lines ~ .The ~',

figure:

Ex. 3·

occurs in several works, particularly as a design in counter- ,


pOint, including the Symphonies Nos. 2 (Mysterious Mountain)
and 6 (Ce1estia1.Gate). Another late instance of prominent
a.scending minor sixth, then turning dowm'lard can be found in
phrase 2 of the main theme of Fra Angelico (see Chapter XII,
Ex. 21).
3. Particularly in works with dance-like character,
the composer uses small numbers of notes, with rhythmic re-
petitions which place the accents on different notes each
time. In the following example, from SYmPhony No.l6 (1962)
the five-note figure is repeated in rhythmic groupings of
sixes:
43

Ex. 4

. \ ~.

Later in the movement an example of. the raga-like design


spoken of above occurs. The five-note scale D-B-A-F-E down-
ward is basic. Note the six-pulse patterns, as in Ex. 4,
with each five-tone grouplng on a new downward note, rather
than simply repeating as above. Thus the five-note scale
forms the main melody line as well as the line indicated by
the *' s. :
Ex. 5

. .t.
~fI.
~

'"
.....
A
r-u
... - •• ",,!~
. ~ , "!~'"l'
,
'-
"~
~,..,..-
~~~
~.I1
i"" r.a .....

--
J t'"
-~
*""'g .....

..
I I J ~ t'l
,~-
'I:
r.:J .....

-- I ,
f'1:1
f-
~.
"'( .•
_1'2 ... .1.
,
v~

I III
~.~

4. In order to confirm the tonic note of modes, repeated


notes and other prolonging devices often occur on the 2nd de-
gree in descending patterns. The figure (Ex. 6) is particular-
ly ~reva1ent as a phrase ending in the Armenian period and
can be found thereafter 'as late as Wind Drum in 1962.
44

Ex. 6

Melody in the Second Period


With the second period the notes within modes begin to
take on more individual personalities. This includes not
only the 6th and 2nd degrees mentioned above, but also the
'4th degree which often occupies the. penultimate position in
a melodic line., a clearly nOll-dominant effe~t. This is re-
lated to Armenian and Russian practice, although the latter
probably was of very little importance to the composer. It
does, however, provide interesting examples of the same device.
45

Repeated notes become quite common in the melodies of


this period. This occurs for several different reasons. One
pu~ose is to gener~te motoric motio~ of a drone-like charac-.
ter. 'I'his usage is not genuinely melodic and will therefore
be discussed in a later chapter. But. one can also distin-
guish instances where repetition has a definite throbbing
quality, as if of a recitation tone for chanting. The open-
ing of the Lake of Van Sonata~ Op. 175 (a work of the 1940!s
despite its late opus) is also used as a fugue subject in
. the 15th symphony.

Ex. 9. Lake of Van Sonata

(The 15th symphony uses approximately the first half of


the theme, made diatonic by using D~ instead of D#.)
There are many passages in the second period that rely
very heavily on melody without any counterpoint or harmonic
accompaniment to speak of. In the second movement of the
concerto Zartik Parkim (19~9)~ the solo piano presents melod-
ic material in the right hand with coloristic interpolations
in the left hand, but no rea.l additional music. (However tb'"
left hand does emphas1~e A and E, clearing up a possible
modal ambiguity between D and A.) The mode is a simple
46

A-Aeo1ian-'-raised sevenths are always very rare, in Hovha.ness.


In Ex. 10 the first twelve bars constitute the basic
material. The rhythm of these bars is repeated exactly, a
total of '-four times with only the very slight .a1teration of
replacing the second eighth note of b~r 10 with a pair of
sixteenths. The pitches also are repeated, with some·varia-·
tion, 'but these two repeating patterns (rhythm and pitches)
are slightly out of phase. Hovhaness is actually treating
the line as a would-be raga (and "the rhythmic pattern as a
,tala). The .strong characteristics of the raga are the prom-
-'1nence of the fourth degree' at beg:i,nning -and end (notes 2,
17 and 18) and the fifth degree in the mtddle. With the G,
Hovhaness attains the highest note only once, in the middle
of the line.
The composer alters the given material by judicious
omission or repetition, taking advantage of the one rhythmic
change· (in the tenth bar of the tala) to create the over-
lapping of two statements. The numerical markings in the
example are the author=s. Each bracket indicates one state-
ment of the melodic line. The iterations of the rhythmic
pattern are not bracketed; they are quite simple to'follow~

-The Roman numerals indicate a new statement of the raga.


The Arabic numerals indicate which note of the original line
is sounding.
After this 48 bar, statement, there is another development
along the same thread, in a higher register. The procedures
47 .

Ex. 10. Zartik Parkim

'.:: .... ~..: .... '\.';~'"


Tmpoug. "''\'' . ;.! .. ,
f Allegretto . c ~
lDilpce like) 1.1' -S52)
=----. --'"
- .- -
-
-.. .-
--...
........

:r:fz i3~
~

s G
. 1 89 16 ~ i3l4
- ;l"-~""
~

.--
~ ~-
"

- ,=- ::- l,~--~'-------------


,
..-. ~

~:- .. -~ :..I::::l=-
~
- -- .-
- .-

\$
. Ii 18 1t I ~ 34- ~ 8 ~
I
" . .
-"
. -
~ .-
=J~~. ~=1 :J,- -~ ~~

ClI- t4. IS "

.."

{ ID -
48

of compression and misplaced accents are carried further by


contraction of the 6-beat (3-bar) phrases into 5-beats~-~dth
alternating 2 3·
8 and 8 bars •. By contrast to classical style,
the static effect is still mairrtained by the close-packed ~.

writing, the recurrent fourth and the narrow range (a seventh)


which is clear from the outset, and never exceeded.
Augmented seconds, particularly when they imply major-
minor effects, are the main non-diatonic modal element of
the second period. Ex. 9, from the Lake of Van Sonata, makes
use of this interval, as does the example from Varak quoted
above (Chapter II, Ex. 6). This continues as a factor in the
early third period.· One movement of Flowering Peach features
a saxophone solo devoted entirely to the three tones of root, '
minor third and major "third of a would-be mode (see Chapter
XI, Ex. 5).
A characteristic that develops in this period is the use
of quick arabesque-like embellishing figures, sometimes in
groupings of 3 or 5. This happens in two ways. Firstly, it
can occur within melodies to prolong or emphasize melodic
units by use of surrounding motion rather than literal re-··
statement (EX. 11). Secondly, it can introduce lines which
predominantly use longer notes. Such proclamations represent
an extension·of Hovhaness's preference for short-long figures
(EX. 12). The first type of elaboration is more prevalent in
·the works of the early 1950 t s •
49

.
Ex. 11. Shepherd of Israel (1951)

Ex. 12. Suit~ QP.99 (1952)

r§!'" ~~ - .,;.~---­
~
... =if
WfiJ; "=E_1_ '..

Many sections feature melody with accompaniment, often


with ! ~!
~
repeated note designs 1n the accompaniments,
with hannonic rhythm usually at one chord per measure or
slo~ler. These sections are often labelled "aria." The lines
are very smooth, largely stepwise, and often have crescendo •••
decrescendo effects that conform to up"lard a.nd downward turns
of phrase or provide additional me~ning to repeated note pat-
terns. The phrase lengths are often varied and involve
prime-numbers; it is interesting that Hovhaness himself com-
ments on these sections giving great detail on the phrase
lengths but ignoring the actual melodic material (see Appen-
dix - Item 3). Usually there is one high point, attained
only once, and coordina'ted with the highest dynamic level.
Whe~ the high point occurs twice, then the high dynamic level
. occurs twice. The ensuing excerpt del!lonstrates most of these
characteristics;
50

Ex. 13. Dlran (1949) ~

(fit Itft f1 t life I(tire I' r r rM


. ,

.,
Melody in the Tpird Period
l'Ti th the advent of his third period, Hovhaness begins
to make use of new types of melodic ideas even though he
still·continued many aspects of r~s earlier melodic writing.
He uses less motoric drone writing, except for certain in-
struments to which it is particularly suited. He· uses some
senza misura writing. l'li th the relaxation of drones and
51

some use of complex meters, melodies. take on a freer nature,


sounding less periodic. (In the second period., many melodies
,with complex varied , phrase lengths sound
.
more regular than
they a~pear due to use of more uniform note values with more
static accompaniment.) Melodies whic,h are periodic may have
more, complex numerical periods and create expanded drone, ef-·
fects of a more dramatic nature. (Instances of such effects
where the melody repeated has major-minor implications exist
in the 2nd and 3rd symphonies.)
In the ensuing example from Glory to God (1954), the
opening has the aforementionedpro~a.niation character, with
arabesques around the D near the beginning. Eighth note
groupings are 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, and then a series of 3's. The
barlines noted only give pOints of' stress, in the part of
the excerpt where Hovhaness tightens the metrical situation
'for added'intensity, by using uniform notes. Note the re-
.peated,D's to set off the climactic G and the return of the
quicker notes embellishing the G and then D. The only skip-
wise motion is either to or from the tonic G (Dorian).,
another means ?y which a mod.al tonic can be articulated.

Ex. 14. Glory to God

• I
52

.In this period Hovhaness first uses highly restricted


modal vocabularies$ In fact the restrictions here are much
greater than in later works~ if we measure restriction by the
numbel' of" notes admitted to melodic writing •. We have alrea.dy
cited the instance in Flowering Peach; a Similar occurrence
takes place in Khaldis, for piano~ four trumpets and percus-
sion (1951). In one movement, ca.lled "Three Tones" the
lengthy piano solo at the beginning (more than half of the
entire movement) uses only three melodic notes with an added
drone note~-the drone note would be the fifth of the mode .
.--~mplied by the three ·melody- not~s, if -a normal modal si tua-
tion were in effect. Variety is created by rhythmic effects
and permutations of the main notes~. with the interest, 1n
second period fashion, being quite motoric--due to the steady
motion of the drone note. Here is an extract:

In this period Hovhaness also continues major-minor usages.


In the following example from Christmas Ode (1952) the last
'" . I
four note~ outline a major-minor triad. The rest of the ex-
ample is entirely stepwise and uses embellishing patterns
around. the fifth degree. Short notes precede the long notes~

as we have come to expect.


53

. Ex. 16

I' Ae'--er- r@rr lt1Ifrr tire Ieftrt£ @##f' I§e


_. _. - - - - - . . . ; . . --. - - - e - .. u"
I'
d I~
·Ia, ,.".

There is a certain splendor of mood implied by some of


these passages--the latter, in partic~ar, has attractive·
celesta accompaniment. Such moods may account for the use of
modes with major third in some religious works, such as the
"·stately Gloria from Magnificat (1957).

Ex. 17

I#J j IJ J. Id. ,
Those early third period works which are characterized
_py _great sparseness and dissonance do not r~present much .._____
development in terms of melody. There are two types of sit-
uations. Some sections are Virtually non-melodic; these will
be left entirely to further chapters. Other sections feature--
brooding modal lines, not very different from those in other
works, but harmonized with harsh chordal and textural effects.
The nD~ath of Vartanrr movement from the ~t. Vartan Symphony
has this character. It is also found in chamber works such
54

. '.

as the Quartets Nos; 1 and 2 for flute, oboe,. cello and


harpsichord.

Melody in .!!Ie Fourth Period


As mentioned in Chapter II, melody is very important in .
the fourth period. There are several new meiodic traits in-
cluding the following:
1. Modes are employed with a greater proportion of
minor and augmented seconds to major seconds than earlier.
It wil1·be noted that normal diatonic modes have no augmented
seconds and only two minor as against five major seconds.
Normal pentatonic scales have only major seconds. Some spe-
cific dimension of Hovhaness's feeling for augmented seconds,
. '.
as well as his verbal acknowledgement of the relevance of the
term II raga" is found in this quote from -the analysis printed
as foreward to the score of "Shepherd of Isz:ael." The quote
also contains interesting value judgments. (i •.e. "cheap")
about Western even-tempered tuning:
The arrows refer to the pure intonation of the mode
or raga: .~A ::.' I ' . oJ f ~~,. .
-;~ ~, ~I
~~~ ~
. . . .. ' .
.

The "A sharplf is sung and played 1/6 tone below


IIA sharp,1l while the liE flat" is sung \ and played
- 1/6 -tone above liE flat" --not exactly but approxi~
mately; the ear will guide the intonation accurate-
ly.
. .
. Scales with augmented seconds loose their nobility
and become cheap wh~n transferred from their an-
cient practice to the modern usage of the We.st be-
cause the tempered scale is especially destructive
to these larger interva.ls qr rather, the .falseness
55

of equal temperament is nowhere more obvious than


in the cheap modern augmented second: therefore,
in the section of my work this scale should be
heard in its ancient majesty--and the arrows are
used to help the performer attain the true char-
acter of the scale.
Hovhaness does not offer any particular alternative to
standard l'lestern tuning. His instruction to alter pitches
Itnot exactly but approximately" suggests that he has no rig-
orous ideas on exactly what tuning scheme is best, either
from a precise mathematical standpoint or a cultural one.
The indication to alter'pitches occurs in very few works,
and in each case the performers are aQvised that the suggested'
alterations are not ,to be taken too strictly" The decision
not to be more rigorous has two reasons. The first is that
he has no ideal scales in mind and feels exact tuning in-
structions '\'lOuld encumber rather than enhance the emotional
flow of melody. The second is that Hovhaness always strives
to make his music easy to perform and 'precise intonational
changes would create difficulties.
2. Where pentatonic modes are still in effect the mode
-is not strict but utilizes one or more minor seconds. In
other words, where G-A-C-D-E is strictly pentatonic~ Hovhaness,
in his fourth period, will more likely use G-Ab-C-D (or Db)-E.
-
In diatonic Situations, the Phrygian mode becomes more pre-
valent, because of the strong minor second between tonic and
second degree.
3. Melodies tend to observe modes very strictly.
56·

4. Hovhaness occasionally .employs pre-existing modes.


from non-Western traditions. Early Armenian church modes
and traditional Indian ragas are among the sources he acknowl-
edges. However, this does not happen often, and in any case
the actual melodic 'material is always newly composed.
5. The raga-like development of.melody mentioned above
. becomes even more prevalent, as harmony and counterpoint be-
come more static'in the works of the period.
6. ' Glissandos are used, par'ticularly for dramatic ef-
fectso Often the composer uses a glissando upward into the
. ---high-note of.~. melodic phrase.
7. Although stepwise motion remains prevalent, the pro-
portion of skip's ·increases slightly. More importantly, skips
and total melodic ranges are extended •
. Other aspects of his melodic writing remain as they were
earlier. In particular, one still finds the tendency to .
begin melodies forcefully on first beats.
A typical fourth period melody is the main theme of
Ukiyo-Floating 1vorld. The opening phrase of' the melody in
a G-based Phrygian mode

Ex. 18
57

illustrates many of the above points. The flattened second


degree, Ab, is used strongly at the beginning and the middle
of the phrase. Except for the C-Ab skip in the second bar
. '.
and the similar G-Eb in the third; each of which bringb out
the strength of the lower note, the motion is stepl'lise or by
upuard seventh--the inversion of a downward step. So ·the
line has wide skips, but not many, and can be regarded as an
almost entirely stepwise line with ·tr-anspositions. In fact
the downward scale of G Phrygian beginning on Ab is the raga-
·basis of the line.
An interesting ~omparison of third and fourth period
melodies is afforded by To the God Who is in the Fire, a work
for male voices and percussion which exists in two versions,
one from 1956, the other from 1965. The revision leaves much
of the music untouched--cyclical percussion effects with in-
'terpolations of four-part chorales for the voices constitute
much of the l'lork. In both versions there is a central tenor
solo arioso on the word "Adoration." This is the main mate-
rial wI-dch is different. So there exist two melodic lines
different in period and style, both of which "rere used for
the same section of a particular work. The ensuing examples
present. these lines. T~le eCtrlier one was notated by the.
writer by melodi'c dictation taken from a private recording
since this· version of the \-lork is not available in print.
The later one, like mo~t of Hovhaness's music of the 60's,
is quite easily availabie:
58

Ex. 19 •. To the God Who Is In the Fire-Original Version

aJ t erI effil ae HCtr I


A ., - J, - rt -
Q I J J J ef
+~, A -
~ 5 .... ~' .
.--~r-e----re-..-'l("'---)~E#A-f0Z-4W fJ IdiE jd jeEr I IrE ~ I' ~ta·
I)

b - t4 - +1m. R· .' do· rt - ..

;0+'on,·I • ;;J I d J I h..


A
olf r I!:ill Ire r rIJ scIj;p I
- .. -"a;· - ""'ion,
. ,....
; - IJ p r elf' Err Ircqlp E I" I f ~ I' rI ,+
A - .40- -

'£ F fIEJA r., r d Ire J pi "


A -
1
r1 - fiDn, .
II

The earlier version is' immediately seen to be the more


ornate; quintuplet arabesques do exist in late period music--
as in Ex. 18, but the smooth melismatic character of third
period writing causes them to be a bit more frequent there.
The first example is in the Dorian mode on A, with one
59

Ex. 20.' To the God Who Is In the.Fire-Revised Version

4... k., "'a f# flM.. A.. . J."... ,., ~

'17o ·1 "I~t· ~
A· .. 40 ... r4 ., +'0'\, . A -

-. alteration" F-natural" to help empha.size the climactic high


A. The second makes use of an altered sexta t'omc vocabulary"
A-Bb-D-E-F-G" containing two minor second intervals. And
there is exactly one "accidental" here" the Eb which gives
-extra impetus to the major 9th D-E glissando and allows an
exact sequence with E-D-Bb by A-G-Ebo The A is the high note
of both lines, and is struck only once, at the loudest pOint"
about 3/5 through the entire melody. The earlier example
uses fluid juxtapositions of note-values and groupings, not
unlike Ex. 14. There are normal halves" triplet halves, nor-
~l quarters" triplet quarters and quintupiet eighths, and
different phrase lengths, with the held notes on the syllable.
60·

nr~n including three types: dJ9 ,o~, and J o~" L The


later examp1~, by' contrast is melodically and modally more
repetitious. There are only two rhythmic configurations
used: ; d' J f, and '0 .' 'Despite its greater length
and ornateness" the first example has .. a range of only a
ninth, and the low G of this G-A range occurs only as 'a lower
neighbor cadentia1 embellishment of the A. The later example
includes an additional low 4th (or '5th, if we disregard the
G of the first example), covering most of the normal tenor
·vocal range. The basic material of the early instance is
-stepldse motion--severa1 of its phr~ses are entirely stepwise,
including the opening and the phrase with the ascent ·to the
high A. Others use a small proportion of quite small skips--
thirds and a few fourths. The later example is rich in skips;
the first phrase contains only one step. Most of the skips
are thirds,. but this is not due to any avoidance policy for
wide Skips. In fact, the line culminates in a theatrical
major ninth interval which is made more forceful by the re-
striction of skips to thirds earlier. Finally, this culmi-
nating phrase of the later melody uses glissandi in the ma-
jor ninth interval and the notes surrounding it.
AS.a last topic in thi~ chapter, it might be worthwhile
to gl~nce at two works that build entire sections from basic
modes, the ·15th Symphony and Wind Drum, both of which date
from 1962.
61 .

Symphony No. 15
Symphony No. 15 is subtitle4 "Silver Pi1grimmage" after
a novel of Anantanarayanan. Each of the first three move-
ments of "this piece'uses strict and limited modal vocabularies.
The last movement features diatonic modal counterpoint using
material similar to that of E~. 9, but without any augmented
seconds. The modes of the first three movemants are as
follows:

Ex. 21

Ex. 22

Ex. 23

The fifth degrees serve strong almost "dominant ll functions


and appear forcefully in timpani patterns:
62

Ex. 24

As ':3ill be shown in Chapter IV~ Hovhaness inclines~ par-


ticularly in this period~ to select modes which derive from'
a sirigle triad.· The notes of the triad generate the mode by
admitting as additiqnal notes only those at one half step
distance from them. It will be noted that the three modes
._... quoted above strictly conform to this pattern with the excep-
tion of one note--the Bb in the mode of the first movement.
The opening of the first movement is for violas~ with
murmuring accompaniment. It establishes both the mode (raga)
and the metrical pattern (tala) of !.GJ'o .. The notes of
the mode are introduced gradually--starting,out \'lith G-Ab in
the first tviO b5.rs, G-Ab-Bb-C in the next five; C-D#-E in
the next two~ F# in the next bar~ and so forth. The melodic
motion is predominantly stepwise, and the highest dynamic;
f~ occurs only· in conjunction with the highest note, Ab~ so
that the whole passage has a range of a minor ninth. To
emphasize this climax~ the composer employs the diminished
third F#-Ab melodically.. Long notes occur in order to em-
phasize new melody notes, such as the first occurrences of
F# or the high Ab. There is little ornamenting by means of
quick-note figures.
63

In the six-note mode of the second movement· the interval


A-C# functions as a stepwise mov~ment, because it is deter-
mined by t\,10 consecutive mode notes. This lends the movement
a brighter melodic quality, and this is enhanced by some
skips to and from the E. By leaving out F and/or Gil,
Hovhaness can employ actual A~Major broken chord figures.
~his in turn leads to a harmonic si~plicity affording possi-
bili ties of stretto which are used \,1i th consonance. (Late
Hovhaness stretti, as I will point out, need not be consonant
at all.) The movement is binary and both halves use the
... 'diminished th:Lrd. interval at moments employing high range.
The major part of the third movement is devoted to a
senza misura section in slow tempo, not unlike. the alap sec-
vions of Indian music. The solo flute 1s featured in its
low register. The whole line uses a minor ninth range, from
C to Db, analogous to the range of the viola line of the
first movement. Glissandi are used profusely for minor sec-
onds and diminished thirds, which are quite frequent. Sug-
gestions of a diatonic"Gb modality occur by use of the di-
minished third' Gb-E~ leaving out F and proceeding to Db; in
the pattern Gb-E-Db the E sounds like Fb in Gb Mixolydian.
_.. _Of course, the drone-murmuring accompaniment permanently
sustains C and F, making these suggestions no more than
slight. Introduction ·of melodic notes is again gradual, and
many different arabesque' figures and time values are used.
The introduction of a new melody note leads. to a passage of
64

flourishes and figurations around that note, using those near


it that have already been introduced. The introduction of
Gb, for example, leads to this passa~e:

Ex. 25

Repeated notes are introduced shortly after the intro-


duction of the high Db, and the melody proceeds downward
thereafter, ending on the low C.
The passage for solo flute is of considerable length
and is limited in tone color; the flute is in its lowest
range." Variety is achieved by the use of mixed time values
and various arabesque figures. As such, the section is one
of ~he most Eastern of any in Hovhaness's music.

Wind Drum
The dance-drama Wind Drum is about a half hour in dura-
tion and is based throughout on one mode:

Ex. 26
The piece is in 21 movements, of which the even-numbered
ones are narrative recitatives for baritone chorus or solo
with chimes. This is a rare instance where Hovhaness indi-
cates suggested ratios of intonation for the tones of the .
mode. These ratios are offered only as one possj.b1e tuning
scheme and are indicated in the above example. Of particular
interest is the C-Db interval which i$ very tight, in fact,
a microtone. This interval plays an important role in A
Major-Minor effects. Tl;le tw'o timpani and two of the (most
often used) chimes are in C and Db.
-'------The mode itself is in two-halves--the -first half, A-Db,
consisting of four very tightly packed notes, the second half,
Db-A, consisting of four quite loosely packed ones. This
dichotomy of the models nature may account for its failure
to become tiring through so many sections. The opening col-
oristic rumbles for double basses, pi~zicato, bring this out
at the start of the work. The first bar is taken from the
notes and character of the second half of the mode and the
second bar from that of the first half of the mode.

Ex. 27
66

The recitative movements use the same musical material


each time, with changes made to accommodate th~ words. Except
for the opening overture, all the other ~ovements are dance-
like and quite melodic. They ha.ve descriptive titles and
most have a characteristic rhythmic pattern analogous to
~ndian tala. Many of these incorporate "short-long" p'atterns.
Some of the talas are:

~ ~ IJ. JJ tJ. JIaJ.J. I from III. ' "Dance of OceanMist~"

ft ~J n. I from XVII. "Dance of Steep Hills"

from XIX. "Dance of Ocean Slumber"

An interes:ting case is No. XIII" liThe Flute of Azura


Heaven, n in l'lhich the basic tala is flexible in the follol'ling
tolay. In 4time the scheme is J d J ,d. I; where the two quarter-
notes can be replaced by any number of quic~er notes occupy-
ing the same space. The two bars quoted from'the melody line
are possible instances of this procedure.

Ex. 28a Ex. 28b

A good example of the actual melodic writing can be


found in the following e'xtract from the middle of IX. nDance
of Singing Trees. n
67

Ex. 29

The movement opens with the C-C octave skip and it is charac-
teristic for the whole section. vIe note instances of a fi ve-
'note figure in 4-time, with sequence, at "a" and a three-note
figure·in 4-time, ~tlthout sequence, at b. The entire quote
outlines scale writing from Db down 1 1/2 octaves to A, back
aga~n, and back down again. The end resembles Ex. 6. The
scalar figures that underlie the melody are indicated by the·
XIS. Observe, starting.in bar 7, that the first several
. notes of ·the upward scale t-l.re embellished by ~ownward three-
note patterns--'\'Tith the scale note appearing first and long-
est in each grouping. This is made more energetic when the
A is reached and the syncopated 16th-note effect is used,
still employing three descending notes. Ffl-E are retained
68

and become the opening notes of the ensuing bar. The scale
continues upl'rard to B" C and D. The embellishing notes are
now on the stronger beats" and they are maintained at the.
same pitches (F#, E) rather than rising sequentially. An , ,;:
ostinato effect is achieved" appropriate to the general rise
in the line tOl'lards its climax. .(Shortly after the passage
quoted the line attains high E above the stave" which is the
high point" as usual reached only once in the entire passage.)
Aesthetic questions may be raised about a work such as
Wind Drum "There such a restricted vocabulary has been extend-
... " ---ed -t-hrough so· much music. The dimension -of harmony " import-
ant in some works is quite insignificant here" being re-
stricted to simple drones. Part of the appeal is in the
subtlety of melodic embellishment" as in Ex. 29" in features
of rhythm" and particularly scoring". which will be discussed
further on.
CHAPTER IV

HARMONY AND HARMO:N1C PROGRESSION

,,,:

According to the Groves Dictionary article on Hovhaness'


by Peggy Glanville-Hicks, Hovhaness'smusic·flrelies primarily
.-
on melody and rhythm rather than harmonic elements." The
suggestion that the music is not harmonic, does not move har-
monically, or has no harmonic progression, is inherent in
this remark. The quote may therefore seem quite absurd to
those who consider the.strongest moments in Hovhaness's
career to be those characterized by particularly expressive
chordal episodes. Yet there are other moments when the com-
poser creates a state of harmonic neutrality for long periods
during which melody, rhythm and scoring" give the music its
-------meaning. -"The situation-is swnmarized by th~ following points:
10 Hovhaness sometimes lets harmony and harmonic
progressions dominate musical sections. These
include chordal passages devoid of other in-
ter~s.tJ contrapuntal episodes and aria-like
melodic passages with chorqal accompaniments.
2. Hovhaness sometimes neutralizes harmony by
complex polytonal sound-l'rebs, by long held
pedal-chord or drone-chord effects which neu-
tralize or even eliminate a sense of progres-
sion if not of the harmony itself, or by thin
textures that avoid chordal simultaneities.
3. Hovhaness clearly differentiates these two
types. Each is either wholly present or
wholly abs~nt from a giyen ~assage; moreover,
he does not permit intermediate composite or
mixed situations. Harmony n~ver has a minor
role. It either has a dominant role or else'
no role at all.

Basic Chordal TyPes (Consonant~ "Constructed")


'Naturally~ the extremes of forceful and neutral harmony
are both difficult to achieve. Although it is not clear
whether this object led to the choice of. a 'restricted chordal
vocabulary or vice versa, it is certainly true that the
chords chosen by Hovhaness are very special. There are tl'10

basic types, not including chords that result from polytonal


-'-, 'contrapurital -combinations or' simult~neous sounding of most
or all of the notes of a given mode in drone~ pedal or rhythm-
less situations. Sounds created in this way oc,casionally do
conform to the two types presented below, but are not really
-"to-'be considered as harmonic events in any case • The two
basic types are:
1. Triads and open perfect consonances. Except
in 2- or 3-voice counte:r~'J~nt, where it may
be unavoidable, the composer rarely writes an
incomplete triad by means of a bare imperfect
consonance.
71

2. Sounds cons,tructed a~ 'follows:


a. A basic consonant chord or interval
is selected. It may be any consonant
sound_
b. Additional notes are considered admis-
sable to the final sonority only if
each is a half-step eith~r above or
below one note of the basic chord.
c. The notes of -
. the basic chord are sounded
together 'With any of the admissable
, '---notes. No other notes may occur.
Clarification: The basic chord may not be aug-
mented or diminished--it must be consonant, and
it must be sounded. It cannot be the construc-
tive basis of the chord without being sounded.
Only notes related to the basic chord by half
step interval are admissable. The half-step
relationShip may not be iterated. In other
words, a note related by half-step to an ad-
missable note is not necessarily also admis-
sable.
For example,B-D-F-F# is such a "constructed" chord since
the basic B Minor triad includes its fifth, Ffl, which in turn
justifies the only added note" F~ ,which is a half-step
-away. ' However, B-D-F is not used because F# is wissing and
there is no ''lay to justify the simultaneous B-F in the same
72 '

chord. (A prominent instance of a bare tritone, rather bla-


tantly violating these princip1e~ of chordal vocabulary does
exist in a very early work, the first symphony, where the in-
terval D-G# occurs climactically just be'fore the open fifth
a t the very end.) Whole tone chords are also ruled out', and
in certain ways they are the ~omp1ete,antithesis of this vo-
cabulary. Even any three-note whole-tone combination cannot
be justified; as there are no ha1f-~teps, no additional tones
are admissable. Only triads or sub-triads would be possible,
and the only whole-tone triad is the augmented one, which is.
·_·,not· ·permissab:;L~,. because it 1s dissonant.
Chords which are permitted are of several characters,
which will be detailed presently, but they have in common
these important properties: Every chord does in fact have a
root, in the traditional sense. Every chord has an effect of
simultaneous consonance and dissonance produced by using si-
multaneous neighboring tones, also in the traditional sense.
As such, Hovhaness's harmony is perhaps closer to Western
music than other aspects of his work. However, the vocabu-
lary can lead to passages rich in minor and augmented seconds'•.
This brings it close to the quasi-Oriental modal and melodic
vocabulary outlined in Chapter III.
Hovhaness usually spells the chords so. that the inter-
vals determined by the half-step relations are minor seconds
and rarely augmented primes. For example, the chord formed
by adjoining a lower neighbor to the third and an upper
73

neighbor to the root of 8, major triad ,is spelled F-Gb-G#-A-C.


This creates the doubly-augmented prime between the two in-
flections of Grs~ but preserves the identity of the basic
F-!-lajor 'chord and the traditional'minor second relationships'
, of the added neighbor notes. G:tven the so:und of a, chord,' the
basic chord from which it is formed need not be uniquely de-
termined. In this case~ the spellingF-Gb-Ab-Bbb-C yields
an equivalent chord as built up from,F Minor. There are
cases l'There even the root 1s not clear, but these are thinner
,note complexes with no actual complete triad. The Chord
, '--B-C-G,' for example, can be built f~om C-G with adjoined B or
B-G with adjoined C, and thus could seem to be derived from
anyone of four basic triads, namely C Minor, C Major, G
Major or E Minor.
The ensuing examplesillustrate'some chords used, with
'explanation of which notes are basic and which are adjoined:

Ex. 1. Oh, For A Shout of Sacred Joy (1958)

The F Major chord is basic, F# acts as a misspelled Gb.


The correct spelling would lead to a diminished 6th in the
bass, one of the few intervals Hovhaness considers so
74

unnatural as to cause him to misspell adjoined notes. B is


a half-step from C. Note that it is not necessary to state
Band C in the same octave.

Exs. 2-5. From Look TOl-Tard the See (1957)

The basic chord is F Major. 'Of the six possible adjoined


notes, only Gb and Bb are missing.

Ex. 3

-
\,~ I ...... :·.::·:?/
~;'IIi'V-
.- --
......- .. ..

The basic chord in this instance is only a third. The


'-upper note is E, admitting D# and F as adjoined notes. The
lower note may pe either C or 0#; either one admitting the
other..
The basic chord (Ex. 4) is the perfect 4th Db-Gb. This
is because the Gb can admit both F and G, but neither of
these two notes admits the other. The C is obviously ad-
mitted by Db.
15

Ex. 4
'.

Ex. 5

, b~~
~
~

In this instance, either Gb-Db or F-C is the basic in-


terval, either, 'Pair of notes adroi tting the other.

Ex. 6

Ex. 7

(Both f'rom Vision From High Rock, 1954)


76

The simple major-minor chord can be generated as in


Ex. 6. Either the minor or major third belongs to the basic
chord, admitting the other third. Ex. ~ illustrates a dia-
tonic possibility of a major chord with an adjoined 4tb de-
gree.

Ex. 8. Macedonian·Mountain Dance '(1938)

.. .
This early excerpt from a piano lef~ hand part shows al-
ternation of the two possible adjoined notes admissable by
the A in the basic D-A interval.

Ex. 9. Symphony No. '4 (1958)

Ex. 10. Symphony No. 13 (1954)

The full five-note cluster of Ex. 10 may be analyzed


with either F#-A or F-Ab (0#) being taken as the basic diad.
77

If the major 3rd F-A were basic, neither note could admit G.
The chord in Ex. 9 can only be formed with Ab-Cb (B) as basic.
It is identical to Ex. 10 except for a note removed--the sec-
ond highest of the five, but this removes the freedom of
choice of basic chord. G-Bb cannot be taken as basic even
though it would admit all the. other notes. Bb itself 'is ab-
sent from the chord and cannot therefore be considered as a
member of the basic interval or triad.

Ex. 11. Mysterious Mountain (1955)

G Major or Minor (G-A#-D) is the basic chord. If the


... Ebmajor triad were basic, C# would not be-admissable. No
third or fifth without complete triad would work as the notes
are too many and far apart to be all admissable by such an
interval •
. .The nature of this harmonic palette can be correlated
wi th emotional and philosophical ideas of Hovhaness I s approa'ch
to composing. A basic strength and character derive from the
. ---basic power of triads and f,rom the fact that any chord has a
root •. The use of minor seconds creates the effect of dis-
sonant chords which contain their own resolutions, so that
dissonance and resolution are clear in one chordal statement.
Thus tonal progressions are unnecessary and unnatural. The
78

chords become suitable for prolongation because they combine


the functions of dissonance and ,resolution normally expressed
in two or more chords. Even when a real resolution is de-
, ,

sired it is obtained not by sounding a new chord but simply-


by releasing the adjoined notes while sustaining the basic
triadic notes. The chords represent, in a metaphysical way,
a quasi-Buddhist coexistence of extre~e opposites--half-step
sounds with purely consonant sounds, without the use of the
intermediate z~unds that might bridge this apparent gap.
For the remainder of this chapter, I shall refer to con-
--sonant-'sounds --of-conventional 'type-without, -adjoined notes as
IIconsonant rr or "completely consona!lt" for clarity, and to the
chords with adjoined notes as "constructed," because of its
formation by building first the basic chord and then the ad-
joined notes by precise rules.
Among the sounds outside thes,e classes l'lhich appear
through polyphonic simultaneity or vertical statement of all'
the notes of a mode, one particular type occurs with suffi-
cient frequency to be worth mentioning. Hovhaness uses dia-
tonic modes in all of his periods, ,although with decreasing
frequency. The verticalization' of such a mode gives "white-
___ note" chords which are quite far removed from the constructed
chords, as they have predOminantly major second intervals.
When these chords do occur, Hovhaness is careful to avoid
,their 'having any definite character as harmonic devices. In
order to accomplish ,this he never uses them except in
79

situations with prevailing diatonic modes. They occur as


held chords, usually in the strings, and notoften·w1th notes
left out. He does this to avoid giving the ear undesired
impressions of such chords as common sevenths, etc. One of
.the few sub-chords to be found is that of a major ninth
chord with removed seventh. ~n this case the ninth is' weak-
ened by its placement in the same octave as root and third:

Ex. 12

~
.. -f ,.
.~

Hovhaness's evolution from period to period brings with


it characteristic differences in harmonic approach. For ex-
---ample,· the frequency of constructed sounds relative to conson-
ant sounds increases in later periods. In addition to the
terminology of consonant and constructed sounds, the author
will use the terlns "harmonic" and "non-harmonic" to refer to
. _passages where harmony does and .does not playa role, re-
spectively.

Harmony in the First Period


Hovhaness's harmonic style approached maturity somewhat
sooner than other aspects. In his first period one finds
many instances of the h~rmonic characteristics
.
which persist
.

later on. This is true more with respect·to 'harmonic than


80

non-harmonic situations, and more with respect to consonant


-than constructed sounds. The reliance on consonant sounds
for harmonic passages, with the exclusion of sevenths, added
notes and other complexities is established here--long pas-
sages contp.. i~ absolutely no dissonan~e.

Open intervals are used in addition to triads. The re-


lative frequency of open fifths to full triads may be some-
what greater here than in the harmonic passages of later
periods. (In non-harmonic passages open fifths often are
. present as long h~ld drones.) In particular, series of con-
secutive-parallel fifths are to be .foUnd, and many passages
end in open fifths, regardless of whether fifths or triads
-predominated before the ending. Major triads sometimes occur
in endings, but they are more frequent in later works. In
contrast to this, endings on plain mtnor triads are quite
. rare throughout the composer's career. The IITierce de
Picardie" becom:es a manne'rism eariy and remains whenever it
is relevant--i.e., in situations that are "harmonic."
The parallel fifths we have mentioned are sometimes
filled in with thirds, so that long str~ngs of parallel root
..
position triads result. Ex. 2 of Chapter II is an example
of this. More extensive instances, in both slow and fast
tempi,' exist in the first symphony (l937).
Bare fifths in parallel style can be found, as in
Exs. 15 and 16.
81

Ex. 13

Ex. 14

Ex. 15. String Quartet No.1 (1936)

Ex. 16. Boreas and Mt. Wildcat (1931)

An instance of an open fifth at an ending, where the


preceding sounds have not been open fifths, exists in the
Three Preludes and Fugues for Piano (1935).
Certain dissonances sometimes occur that are not con-
structed chords. Often these chords are triads with one or
two adjoined notes, but the adjoined notes are related by
. .
modal steps to the triadic notes, and not necessarily by half-
82

Ex., 17

f' _ •
__ .1

.. -
"' ,":n "rt"-

steps. This does, for example, admit the use of any diatonic
"~notes to a 'triad within a gi-ven~diatonic vocabulary. 'General-
ly, the spacing chosen brings out the step relationship by
using the same octave for both basic and adjoined note. When I

th~ steps are restricted to half steps, the sound is clearer,


and such spacing is not required, as noted in connection with
Ex. 1. In a sense, then, this type of dissonance represents
a precursor to two quite different elements of Hovhaness's
later harmony--the strict constructed chords and the verti-
calized wr-i te-note chords. (Ex. 18).
The progressions of this period involve many step~dse

movements, caused in part by the wealth of parallel voicing.


- " -Chromatic chordal effects are quite rare; when the music is
harmonic it is largely diatonic. As mentioned above, raised
thirds occur in final triads, but leading tones are rarely
raised in penultimate chords. The cadences, however, do
usually conform to patterns reasonably consistent with Western
83

Ex. 18. Three Preludes and Fugues (1935)

tradition, V-I, VII-I (Modalb IV-I. Harmonic rhythm is more


__ often slow than fast and conforms to tradition in that chords
change on strong pulses rather than weak ones. The following
example illustrates many of these prOperties:

E~. 19. Missa Brevis (1938)

In general the music of the period is largely harmonic.


When it is non-harmonic Hovhaness either sustains a simple
chord or uses completely unaccompanied melody. Also, con-
sonant sounds predominate and, as described above, the vocabu-
lary of constructed sounds 1s only hinted at.
84

Harmony in the Second Period


Conscious use of non-harmonic writing iS,a major attrib~

ute of the second period. The composer seems to consider it


a very important discovery at thi~ point in his career. It
represents a departure from Western musical aesthetics to-
wards those of the East. Dro~e patterns are frequent; but
so also are complex rapid patterns that have the same harmon-
ic effect. Quintuplet figures for timpani, for example, ap-
pear in this period, establishing usually through a perfect
fourth, a harmonic basis that is constant for an extended
--time:

Ex. 20

His writing for the piano often establishes constant


chordal backgrounds, as in Ex. 10 of Chapter II. Frequently
harmonic neutrality is created by melodi.es that consistently
have the notes of the drone-triad on the strong beats. An-
other means of creating non-harmonic music is through counter-
point, often canonic, wPich is deliberately non-consonant.
The resulting vertical structures are simply blurs of many
notes of the prevalent ~odal vocabulary. This parti~ular

technique will be discussed in the, next chapter.


Often, many types of non-harmonic" contrivance occur
"Simultaneously in an orchestral texture. In the ensuing ex-
cerpt from za~tik Parkim (1949)" the .florid piano part has
"

B~ the drone-tonic, at the outset. B is one member of all


two-note tremolo patterns. Most melodic skips begin or end
on B, excepting" of course, the sequential skips of the third
bar. The violins I (divisi) have the clear B-F# drone, while
the timpani have the same notes in quintuplet fashion. The
clarinet established F# (iT. is a transposing A clarinet in
"the score) by drones--note the quintuplet proclamation of
--the" seventh bar. The second violi~s "add counterpoint" near
the end. It is a simple B Dorian line--the first four strong
beats are A-F#-D-B. The line is not necessarily consonant
with the rest of the music at all times, but adds melodic
direction and rhythmic and harmonic"thickening, without in
"any way suggesting harmonic progression or detracting from
the sustained B situation.
The constructed sounds largely absent in the first
period appear in the second period in some worlts. These
strong dissonances are associated with harshness and anger
or lamentation. The roles of consonance and dissonance l'Thich,
in later Hovhaness, become quite different from the usual
Western functions, are still fairly normal here.
The central "Death of Vartan" movement of the St. Vartan
Symphony (1950) contains constructed sounds exclusively.
This fact, along with heavy piano and trombone writing, and
86

Ex. 21

..I1.a.i1 .

Srynk

Andante (J: 6ti) . .

t-::::::-::~:-:-::~~~~~::~.::
RI:\BT

eJ

~:i'.~NI
i

.:;0
Ex. 21 (Cqntinued)

P...

.,-
88

the a.bsence of appreciable dissonan'ce' (except in. clearly n~m­


harmonic polyphonic sections) in any other movement of the
large symphony" gives the movement an unusually harsh effect.
This aggressive use of constructed vocabulary is a major in-
stance of the technique and probably was in the composer's
mind in the years shortly the~eafter" .in most works of the
early third period. An extract from the movement follows:

. Ex. 22

-e-,

'.J. \.' : ._-

- -f 1 ?

According to the labelling sho~~" the construction of


--·-the-chords is as follo,\'1s:
Chord 1: C Major with adqed B.
Chord 2: Either open fifth basic--admitting .
.the other.
Chords 3" 4: Same analysis as 2.
Chords' 5" 6: Same exactly a.s land 2.
Chord 7: Db Major is basic.
Chord 8: Sa.me as 2.
Cho~d 9: C# Major basic-bottom F-d acts as
E#-B#" etc. .'
89

.
The rhythmic structure of short notes preceding long
ones mentioned in Chapter III applies here.
The establishment of non-harmonic writing techniques
does not preclude the persistance '';of a harmonic style in the
Armenian period. There ere three textures in which. harmonic
style occurs:
1. Fugal counterpoint. This will also be dis-
cussed in the next chapter~

2. Chordal passages resembling the correspond-


ing first period music.
-·3 .-Accompaniments for aria-like melodic ·passages.
The chordal passages employ consonance almost completely;
the absence of linear elements makes it difficult to justify
dissonances as passing or otherwise non-harmonic in the
. Western classical sense. Of interest is that the frequency
of these passages is quite low in the second period. They
are more frequent in the first and third periods" wher.e less
stress is put on drive and movement. The essentially linear
and melodic impetus of the music of the middle and late 40·s
mitigates against such passages. When they do occur
Hovhaness refers to the procedures of his earlier music in
---llriting them. One instance" from the Thirtieth Ode of
Solomon has already been quoted (Chapter II, Ex. 3). Here
is E1nother:·
90

Ex. 23. Artik (1949)

" f
~ .
f
, t,J
, J f
q
F
, l1 f,y--.;;t
,..
{/ ~~ t:J
, ,, ,@
~. t 1'<1 ~l.
.... '"""
J\ 'No .J
"'"
~ ,.1.1 ,.~
'1

• ~.~ . . -"--·---1- ~,tJ. .a-


r..,_.
.~ t_d
-- --- -
-'--' b~J
-""'-

--J,
,..,. ,
... ,.
,
..! .... ~
,
-«."7 . ./.
,v , ,.
,....
r~
\Y
-n'

.J... J..~
~:J
,... :'/ •
1- ... .ri l
~

The aria accompaniments are, however, more typical of


the second period, and are frequently very beautiful. Her~

·-we:do find dissonances,· almost· all clearly explained as nor-


mal passing tones or suspensions in a vocabulary that is
largely consonant in acoustical fact, and entirely consonant
in emotional effect. The ensuing passage is typical.
The root movements are typical of Hovhaness. In the
first several bars most root movements are by seconds. The
exception is a perfect fifth but it lacks leading tone effect.
In the last several bars all root movements are by thirds.
Modal rather than tonal progression is highlighted, and the
roots (or bass, in this case) proceed in contrary motion to
the aria line.
91

Ex. 24. Concerto No. 2(1951)

~ ~B.
I"
"', ,
~ ...

" f'J'r . ~.
t
.p--
,
.,., 0f)- f:-
.
I
.,. .,., .,.
I
If
1.1ra
-
.4t/
tJ

. •, •I •i , , ,
• i
t
I I -'
v
t
...t ~

~
(011 6:J
':1
~
LX-
'1
I.{J=:n-r~
-,- .'J
,"J
r..11 tj--g I:~
-I'. «.r

.-
Y I r ~, I I f T I

......

- - -
~ :t ~ ~ l-
r

~
1
CIa
- - 1- i 4.-
jL ....
<J.
iIIIiW
f

. ., , IV
I
Pli
""' _c.. .....
J • I
p"
,
I
, ..... ti-"~'A
~. I '\. ""fil'
I "- ~....,

Harmony in the Third Period


In the early 50's several different directions coexist
in Hovhaness's music. Non-harmonic music continues although
u~ually not in the motoric and occasionally polytonal fashion
92

of the second period. Held chords~ often quite richly scored,


are used. Rhythmless drone passages, to be discussed in de-
tail in Chapter VIII, are also present,. A new interest in
texture leads to a non-harmonic style where thin scoring and
IIklangfarbenmelodie ll -like coloration n,eutralize any effect
other than a static harmonic dimension, as in Ex. 25.

Ex. 25. The Flowering Peach (1954) .


.V , '"'InO:'le
r---- b.e- ... .. -.-:""\ ...............- -_ ... _... .
~
\~
J
II

K-th1
")
N. -
.-
3I111C
e
h(~
..."
'- '\
lJ.."'J
L~ E
i
f ....
... -
~
0

fJ ..
.... -... ., - -..
~,~
~ .~
, ~~~&§~ ~~-~
.....-.
~f·'
~(!.,. ~ ~~
~'I"/
... .,,":'.
CJ (J n ,;,,-;r... ~
I
P,-I',",
-t ...I
~
,I"''''
'A
,,~... - ~
_ . it
_Ll
....
.I ~

8 L'" c....." l.".t .... '-..",-"" -!"


.... A - 1/ -'". -2M
~ . ',11
~. e I
"
\»'
-w

Harp
...... ... .,., __ ....

"
".
-'
. . .... - ..
"

-';:::.1
--er-1 I, I
.
'"
_hL
.. ~

• ~Q
- -. ... ... . .. --. ''''~,

.---.
~,
~.. ",1:.1.. "s=
~

= --
-..
1,
f.-:J -(;J~.
I
1
i1,JF~~ (/
I


A
0-
A~
~~~"
I
--
"' ·G ,..
,- I - ,~ Ii

Harmonic music reaches its greatest richness in the


third period. Completely chordal declamation of the first
period, aria accompaniments of the second, and harmonically
moving counterpoint of both, all are continued into the third
period \,li t'" certain added features. The characteristic
93

perfect fourth drones of the second period lead to the pro-


fuse use of ~ chords in the third period. This permits
Hovhaness to retain an openinterv~l at the bottom of the
chord, °cn;.,t to relieve the heavy effect of the root positions
. heretofore favored by the composer •. He prefers' gls over ~IS
because the open interval gives wider spacing at the bottom
whenever the chord 1s in closed position, a~ .Hovhaness's
chords very often ~re. Also, t~e very weakness of the ~ from
a tonal viewpoint--that the stronger note acoustically (the
lower one) is the weaker one harmonically, is favored by
·--l'Iovhaness ··because it ados a slight ainbigui ty to chords while
the root remains clear. A striking passage of consecutive
gls occurs in the Symphony No.6 (1959) where one pattern is
repeated over and over many times, in rich scoring. It occurs
with a trumpet line emphasizing C, and containing only four
notes, B-C-Db-F, which, simultaneously, would constitute a
clear constructed chord based on F-C.

Ex. 26

Another important development of the third period,


,noticeable in the above example, is increased use of chromat-
icism in progressions. This does not imply chromatic melody
or unexpec·ted added dissonances, but does cause harmonic pas-
94

sages to have a greater range both in expressive'possibili~

ties and use of chromatic notes. This is sometimes allied


with parallel chord scoring as in Ex. 7 of Chapter II
(Magnificat) but occurs frequently~without it. In Ex. 26,
the juxtaposition of the A Minor and C Mipor chords. would
not have occurred in earlier ljovhaness, where a C Majo'r
chord would have been more likely. Frequently this extended
harmonic concept occurs at endings ?f pieces or sections in
which more conventional root movements predOminated. In the
following excerpts, Ex. 27 represents a passage of sustained'
-~hromatic root. movements, where Ex. 28 is an ending of a pas-
sage which is otherwise more usual.

Cadences, which had been rather ordinary in the first


two periods, are now more varied. II-I occurs frequent.ly.
Mediant progressions also occur at endings as do occasional
chromatic relationships such as tritones.
95

Ex. 28. Mysterious Mountain (1955) - Movement 1

.-et
••

Ex. 29. Mysterious Mountain - Movement 2

- r7
,,-
".:'I
..
~
,- ,
. -(7- <.'
.'~'
t· I
"- OU
t , .~:
:J b, r_'" I '"
- .'"; '{ tbf~r ...
"
. :/-,
£: .~~
-~
~.'

llJ~Y,
CJ·
<>, '. -
--- ~_o'
L~
1_,'.1 . . ;;I
r-"
"-\
.#~
1

':. '
96

Ex. 30. Mysterious Mountain - Movement 3

Particularly beautiful examples integrate a few chromat-


ic connections into passages where most of the connections
are diatonic:

-_ .. -Ex·• .-31 .--Symphony No •. 3 (1956)

The harmonic scoring becomes very rich in this period.


Hovhaness much prefers closed position. In passages with
wide range, multiple divisi of string or vocal parts occurs.
This .richness of scoring appllesalso to sections that are
not as consonant or that are not even harmonic. Constructed
chords appear in held-note Situations, and their scoring is
often very full. In the third period, Hovhaness sometimes
writes white-note chords--the verticali.zs.tion of diatonic
modes:
97

Ex. 32. Symphony No.6 (1959)

.. "0
--
Ul:

-
i,./

"'1

-
~
..
..
~

0
c.:
...
... s-rr9~

W ~

Ex. 33. Meditation on Orpheus (1957)

Harmony in the Fourth Period


The general trend away from harmonic towards non-harmon-
ic music culminates in the fourth period, where harmonic
writing is rather rare. The third period techniques of com-
posing harmonically static textures by means of free-rhythm
-writing, constructed chords, mode verticalization and white-
note chords are all pre'sent in abundance. Long held notes
.may.also be found. All these sounds are often scored with
much more aggressive orchestration an~ dynamics. Sforzando
attacks of constructed chords are present, in addition to
the usual softer attack more characteristic of chordal back-
grounds.
A new device occurs which gives .a hint'of melodic move-
ment and resolution or dissonance accumulation to chords
which are, in fact, quite static. I .shall call additive,
the procedure of stating the notes of a chord one at a time
in different voices, sustaining them all until the full
chord is sounded. A precursor of this technique, or at
least its effect, occurs in what might be a very unexpected
'place for a Hovhaness influence, t~e 6th Symphony of
---Tchaikovsky:

Ex. 34. Tchaikovsky - Symphony No.6

I shall call subtractive, the procedure of releasing the


notes of a chord one at a time in different voices, until the
full ~hord is released.
Subtractive and additive chords are 'found abundantly in
late Hovhaness. They provide increasing and decreasing den-
sities of texture, in addition to the other kinds of movement
already me~tioned. Exs. 35 and 36 are additive; Exs. 37, 38
and 39 are subtractive.
99

Ex. 35.
-12 A~enian Folk Dances
..
0' •

(Although written in the 1940's, the work was presented for


publication, and likely revised slightly, in 1963, accounting,
for what seems an early anticipationqf additive harmony.)

Ex. 36. Bardo Sonata (1960)


."

--Ex.- 37. In the Beginning was the Word (1963)

• IJ - .J;.,~_ .(]:..
~
. .{r. ~.;
-.;: .

II A .k ~-i 0" ""::-t-""L»'~


I 'f''' iFi" v-
,
-
Inll ~
~i.:7fI"
• •

Ex. 38. ~n the Beginning Was the Word

I-
100

Ex'. 39. Sonata for 2 Oboes and Organ (1963)

~.r-
...... - - - ., - -
t
v
I":l
'"
- --,..
~

\o,(:J"
... ---.-- ::0. -::~,.. ~ ...

\"
....
~."
0
~

~ '~.

.~'
~ ...
L"'

."" - ...
.!!"
.~ .,
,."

NaturallY$ an arch structure of sonority is achieved by


attacking a chord additively and then releasing it subtrac-
tively.

Ex. 40. Wind Drum (1962)

Counterpoint in this period usually is non-harmonicc


There are some exceptions~ usually based on material con-
ceived in earlier periods. But even more important is that
melody, even aria-like melody, is scored ,not with chordally
progressing accompaniment, but with held chord or rhythmless
neutrality.
Har.monic writing~ when it does occur, is usually not
sustained very long (except~ again, when the passage might
actually have been conceived earlier) and inyolveslong
chords with slow rate of change. Often harmonic rhythm is
101

so slow that progression can ~asilyrecede into held-chord


non-harmonic situations. 'The harmonic writing usually does
not juxtapose chromatic with non-chromatic progressions.
Ei ther ot'· these types of progression· can occur, but usually
without much variety.

Ex. 41. __ fhe Holl City (19 65)


~
..~ .~
-! -
~.

~I :!'
i ~ ~
-
.~
~ • e--
,.
I .tJ.
fI,,"l )
- 1' ... U .... ,;.I.
I·.~;';) ~~
.... .,"
""""A <.J '1:=l~ ~;'~ M
;. j'{ .;.,
., -"
r
"..,CU t.....
II I'" ~
1;;1
.r Ijt ,
ill-,. J-

-v,
He. ~

iii

... Ii)
...
w ~
c
~ ~
~
c:
iA
J:'" .,.
n..' "

- ... . . -
_1'1"'" '::J f .... I·. Ii "- "t"'~1
,i
,." ...,
I e.ft'JI 10; ~

~ ~ 1f"I. c
~
r ~~ b.c- • '::1-
i'" 1:-
Ex. 42. Requiem and Resurrection (1968)

()
·1

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
• --.~~'--~~~~~~~

In conclusion, the dichotomy between harmonic and non-


harmonic writing is wortl"..y of restatement. Passages are
either strongly harmonic or they are n6n~harmonic. Which
situatiou is in effect often gives hints as to how far or
near Hovhaness wishes to approach the actual feeling and ar-
ticulation of Eastern music. To some degree, the two repre- :t.,_".,,,,-

sent the younger and the older Hovhaness respectively.


102

Certainly-the change from harmony to non-harmony was one of


the principal stylistic developme~ts begun after 1943, and
carried to completion in the fourth period.
103

CHAPTER V

CQUNTERPOINT AND POLYPHONY

Hovhaness's work comes closest to traditional Western


music in the area of counterpoint. Polyphonic episodes em-
ploy established Renaissance and Baroque techniques. Classi-
cal contrapuntal schemes are prese~t even in instances where,
the music is essentially Eastern in character and quite re-
mote,from traditional concepts of harmony and scoring.
Particular contrapuntal approaches differ according to
" .
period. Instances can be either harmonic or non-harmonic.
The harmonic cases have chordal progressions as well as con-
trapuntal 'interest. The non-harmonic cases are chordally
static but have textural interest. ,In general, there is a
'particularly clear correlation betw~en the four periods ot
Hovhaness's creative work, and the ,kinds of polyphony used.
The remainder of this chapter will be devoted to inspecting
instances, but the general pa,ttern is as follows:
. 1. The first period is characterized by fugues
which combin, elements of Baroque and Renais-
"

sance tradition. They are predominantly har-


monic. They resemble tonal procedures some-
what less than modal ones, although both are
to be found'.
2. The second period 1s characterized Oy vigorous
neo-Baroque canons which are often non-harmonic.
104

However, chordal drones are, clear and general-


ly consonant, and the polyphony is measured
and controlled along classical lines. Some-
times polytonal harmonic backgrounds occur in
these textures.
3. The third period is not characterized by any
new type, but contains music in both of the
above realms, and elements of the style to be
found in the next period. Also present are
textural counterpoints, akin both to Far
---Eastern and l-Tebernian proqesses.
4. In the fourth period, counterpoint is almost
entirely non-harmonic. There is ,little poly-
tonality and modal centers are usually clear.
HOi'1eVcr:; the writing is frequently dissonant,
with many minor seconds. Canon is a favorite
device, as in the second 'period, but it is
used in different contexts. The unison is
the most common imitative interval. The
measured, quasi-Baroque vigor of the second
period canons gives way to broader and freer
style, often rhythmically static or written
senza misura. Frequently the counterpOint is
in restricted modal vocabularies, as described
in Chapters I~I and IV. Within these contexts,
Hovhaness often seems unconcerned with the
harmonic results of canonic imitation~
105

There is little cross-usage of these techniques in dif-


ferent periods. In fact, it is often possible to date the
. time of composition of contrapuntal passages with surprising
accuracy, even in multi-sectioned 'works compiled over many
periods.

First Period Counterpoint: Modal-·


Tonal Fugal Amalgams
It is quite impossible to estimate how many fugues
Hovhaness wrote before 1943. Many are preserved as such, in
original forms.' Many were revised afterwards. Countless
---others were -shelved or-destroyed but appear in1ate -works, as
recently as the 20th symphony. (The destroyed ones were re-
composed from memory.) Although many mannerisms of mature
style occur in Hovhaness:s early work, these often flounder
amongst passages of considerable lack of stylistic clarity.
Clear style traits occur side-by-side ~dth sounds that are
not consistent with them, or'with Hovhaness1s mature work.
But in the area of polyphony, the early music contains many
conSistently well written passages. Where many youthful com-
posers are confused and uncomfortable with contrapuntal in-
volvement, the young Hovhaness seems surest when polyphOnic
.texture is in effect. Counterpoint affo!ds him the maximum
of flow and interest of modal melody and harmony, ~lhile mi ti-

gating against the static textures that he came to handle


·more strongly in later periods.
Hovhanessnormally chooses fugal or canonic structures
106

rather than free counterpoint. At·thistime, his contrapun-


tal felicity seems to have exceeded his motivic prowess, and
. schematic contrapuntal forms provided a sure way to write
music of reasonable length with sustained interest.
Hovhaness's Nissa Brevis survives in its original form
(1935). It is one of the best works of the first period.
There are three fugues in the work, and they provide its· most
i~ortant sections. The first and last of these, used for
"Kyrie Ele:i.son" and "Dona Nobis Pacem" respectively, employ
similar material, and may serve as typical examples of first
-- - --peri-od .style. ·-An -analysis·of these ·fugues --follows:

Kyrie:
The modal center is E, and the mode is Phrygian but
F:#ts occur as the exposition progresses. The subject has
.. -only one skipwise· interval. The a.nswer is rea.l; tonal an-
swers are rare in all Hovhaness's music, as one might expect.
in. view of his outlook towards modal and tonal vocabularies.
However, tonal Baroque procedure 1s followed in that the
-successive entries are on E, B,E and B. Although by no
means uniform, the tonal scheme for entrances applies in
many Hovhaness fugues, despite modal vocabularies to which
this scheme may not seem relevant •
.. The countersubject also shows modal-tonal duality. The
prominent figure E-B-D marked at x in Ex. 3, clearly empha-
sizes the natural seventh degree of the"Phrygian (or Aeolian)
mode. But. the line does have skips. One series, at y, looks
107

very much like a dominant arpeggio. Naturally, the use of D


instead of D# prevents any real dominant sound in this passage,
but the nature of the melody is suggestive enough. This bar,
inofac'G, with its quicker and smoother ending (z), is tbc '..,
prime feature of the countersubject, and becomes important
later on.
The subject, answer and countersubject are here quoted:

Ex. 1

Ex. 2

o
Ir' r 0

Ex. 3

..
During the exposition, which is regular by tonal stand-
oards,no accidentals appear other than F:#ts. The voices
move melodically, largely in stepwise motion, except when
108

--
they have the countersubject or related material. Immediate-
lyon completion of the fourth en~ry and without any firm
cadence, the composer modulates to what appears to be G
Phrygian, employing imitation of Ex. 3y. The first bar ot'
Ex. 4 is the last bar of the last subject entry, so this bit
of countersubject occupies it~ normal position. The other
three entrances are free. The imitation of E~. 3y, at one
bar's distance, suggests stretto. The four statements are
in B (i.e. beginning on D), E, A and D, following the circle
of fifths. This brings the texture to G, thus achieving the -
-modulation.-All.the triads are innor, and tonic-dominant ef-
fects are avoided. However, the music is allowed to flow
harmonically, gaining accidentals; gradually. This modulation
is not a normal tonal one--from E Minor to G Minor is rather
remot.e--but it is important to realize that it is achieved
through diatonic means. Any two consecutive chords could be
found in some diatonic key. None of the chordal connections
are chromatic. This is entirely typical of first period
counterp~:?-_~~~_. __~~y}~~n~_~~ apparently later found that this
led to disappointing e~dings and many later pieces based
upon first period works have appended endings rich in chromat-
-ic progressions.--At.-any rate, the modulation here is consis-
tent with Renaissance musical thought. A similar remote mod-
ulation by gradual adding of flats takes place in Absalon
Fili Mi of Josquin Des Prez. The relevant bars of the Missa
Brevis are as follovlS:
109

Ex. 4

,~
t , I
I
iIIl.
.;..1
.... 0 ;J
DOl'
.J.
~
li- D -
611
Foil ......
tJl'l" III "'tJI',-
_"""1 V'

,r F
J/Q I
t
t
1

,--~ 1-
- --
.
---.~~ ~
'

.rJ:
......
"It
c , ..
I'"
U

,I

The next several bars are episodic by traditional stand-


ards. The music returns to the initial modal region of E
1?hrygian, and gradually gathers speed. - Throughout, one notes
a simple steadiness of the rhythm. There are no hemiolas,
syncopations or other surprises. Ties are present, but never
in a majority of the sounding voices, so that the strong
beats 'are well articulated. On the other hand, the entire
passage is smooth and sustained, without accents. Reliance
on stepwise motion for'much of the polyphony, lends a sense
of flow. The composer uses long and short note values to
110

enhance this effect. Ex. 5 occurs soon after the exposition,


in the secondary tonal region of G. Ex. 6 provides the last
four bars of the episode, prior to the stretto. In Ex. 5,
,..r
all half-note beats are articulated, but there is almost no
motion quicker than that half-note pulse& In Ex. 6, the
half-notes are still articulated, and the smooth stepwise-
oriented melodic motion is maintained, but intensity is
added by the abundance of quicker quarter-note5. The com-
, ,

poser adds intensity not by the use of progressively faster


speed but rather by increasing the length of quarter-note '
passages; and 'the -number of voices simultaneously occupied
with them.

Ex. 5

r 4
-hit:~
I
,.1
t I A
-v -
-.. ..... -c, ~'
t '" ....
II

-t
...
...., '" ""-
v
- '-;:..C'
_E' :'1
..... t l
I ,
110 . .
y w r r'6
I"
~>Q

,1 ~ 1
41

"".
I
-WI
"
A.
~,
, ,.,
A
I
1t-g, 0 ..l~
,...
hdL .J--~
iUV

l
,....
,
~ --. 0
J
#.J
,..,
7:4

I
- -
-~o
r
I
I

Ex. 6
111

In Exs. 5 and 6, chordal connections remain invariably


diatonic.
The final section of the fugue presents a stretto which
is noteworthy in that it is based not on the subject or ,.\

counter-subject but an amalgam of the two:

Ex. 7

The counterpoint at one barls 'distance' uses accumulating


,
quarter-notes, as in Ex. 4, stopping suddenly on t~e last
five chords, in whole-notes. This sudden cadential broaden-
ing is consistent both with Baroque·and Renaissance practice.
·The final cadence, beginning on an open fifth on A, is en-·
tirely in A Major, and would be analysed I-IV-VI-III-I in
tonal terms. This progression strongly contradicts tonal
practice because there is no V chord, and the rest of the
chords move in the reverse of usual tonal sequence. The
typical progression I-III-VI-IV-V-I yields the actual cadence
used by eliminating the V and reversing the order.
As explained in Chapter IV, Hovhaness could be expected
to avoid t?nal implications. It is interesting that he em-
ploys the standard root movements by fourths, where stepwise
movements could have been used. The use of the more classical
112

Ex. 8

.,

root movements seems a concession to the Baroque fugal tradi-


tion,J which Hovhaness uses with affection, if not complete
acceptance.

Dona Nobis Pacem


The Dona Nobis Pacem fugue l'lhich concludes this mass
makes interesting use of inversion technique, which ,\,las' not
used significantly in the Kyrie. The final fugue is unusual
·in that the answer is the inversion,of the subject. The sub-
ject is the same one as in the Kyrie. The countersubject is
less smooth than that of the first fugue. It has a dotted
rhythm and some passing chromaticism. Hence, the fugue tends
to be a bit more tense and less serene than the first one.
The first two entrances, which contain the subject, counter-
subject and answer once each are here quoted.
The harmonic procedures are similar to the first fugue.
Except for occasional chromatic passages based on the counter-
subject, all chordal connections remain diatonic. The mate-
rial begins in E Phrygian and ends on A, as in the opening
113

Ex. 9

,-I'-eo - a
1-
,-.,..e;, --.-
,f"" '......
Ir 7
I ....
,
"- - - II

~
-

--"" ,..- -.....


I
i _ • .i4
r.. ~' ~ .... n '£ I . I
11!JC Ie ~I
.~

-.-f'"
t-"'
, rc>'
,
I
I I
lEI ....

fugue, 'but the modulations proceed first towards adding


?harps, and then back to E, creating an archlike symmetry to
the-.Kyrie. As in the Kyrie, the return to the -original tonal
center leads to stretto, but this is not at all strict. ' First
there is a tl'1o-voice stretto (Ex. 10) and then a normal entry
for-soprano, followed by a ,slight,suggestion of stretto. A
climax folloW's, achieved not by stretto but by augmentation,
a device thus far absent from these two related fugues. The
soprano has the subject at half-speee, while the other voices
have long overlapping passages of step~dse motion in quarter-
114

. Ex •. 10

-", --"
,; - C
I
.ftC
r'"
I
'I
,I
~,
~
"1'
I ,
1.--0""'1
Ir

I~

-- ,. __ ...

-- \. I

c;:'WV g
J
I

g,
•I
• ., C
I
01
t1'i.
.,
I
_I"N~
O"V
,..,.
'''"
gc:
I

'"

notes (Ex. 11). As in the first fUgue~ most of the polyphony


is stepwise, and the accumulation of quarter-notes leads to
gxeater intensity.

Ex. 11
.'

; :r E' ~ rr~
,

J d~~ *~UJ
I .
. F'rrrrr r2~
rfrr _ l I
9
_. ~i.U-~ - :!'UJ •-
' .. PJ ..
t"" '\1 U PI
I ,
, ... t:!~
A

II
oJ
~ 0";'
,I
I
" I
I I

~ .--.----. . . ~
.. - "._-- - -
115

.The chordal ending in A Dorian is. less extended than


that of the first fugue. It" too" contradicts tonal vocabu-
laries by retrogression of normal chordal sequence--the end-
ing is -V··VII(modal)-IV-I. The brevity of the ending is in~'
part balanced by the darker and possibly more forceful ending
on an open fifth instead of a full chord.
The theory that Hovhaness totally rejected his earlier
work in 1943 is refuted by an incident relating to. this work.
In 1944" while seriously re-thinking his art, the composer
arranged the two fugues analyzed above into a Celestial Fan-
._. - --.-tasy, ...i'or-s..tringorchestra •. As in the mass,·-each fugue is
preceded by recitative material in which the mass uses fewer
"Armenian" intervals (principally a.ugmented seconds) than
the fantasy. Other than that" the string orchestra version
embraces bodily the whole of the choral writing. As a matter
of fact, much of the later work is drawn verbatim from the
string orchestra parts of the mass, which exist primarily to'
·double the choir. Of interest, however, is that Hovhaness
extends the ending of the final fugue, to create a conclusion
that is texturally and harmonically richer. The final chord
is major, and is greatly prolonged, with subject references
... in some voices including cross-relations to the third of the
final triad. Moreover, there is one important bit of chordal
extension. A sole F Major triad is intel~olated among several
A Major triads. This chordal connection, although unexpected
in a 'l'lork pervaded with diatonic chord changes, sounds
116

impressive and stylistically consistent; the chromatic inter-


polation is accepted by the listener as natural for climactic
l)urposes. Such stylistic marriages are not as successful as
1ihis in general" but the good result of this one occurs in'"
many fugal passages" originally written in the first period
and revised thereafter.

Second Period Counterpoint:


Baroaue-Oriental Canons
A shift of interes~ from har.monic to rhythmic intensity
characterizes the polyphonic writing of the second period •.
----No -»el'iodin --Hovhaness t s music -has more -direct phySical vigor
and this spirit is strongly in evidence in his counterpoint.
The typical texture is canonic, with varied distances of en-
trances. The intervallic relation of entries is uS'tlally
quite predictable. Many canons are at the ~ison, where
others use a basic interval iterated for each entrance. In
other words" if the first entrance were on C" and the inter-
val of a perfect fifth were used" the ensuing entries would
be G, D and A, etc., rather than G, C" G. In these cases the
imitation is exact, so that there is some modal contradic-
tion and, as soon as more than two entries are present" poly-
----tonality is perceptible. The tempo is almost all-lays fast,
and the meters are usually not_complex.
In Anahid" an orchestral work to be discussed in the
next chapter because of i-ts great rhythmic interest" 1-le find
a brief but typical canon. The texture is a 4 and the
117

entries are evenly spaced at one beatls distance. All are_ cn


G. Only a five-note range is us~d, and the mode is G Dorian
(or Aeo1ian--no sixth degree is present). The fourth degree
lsvery strong; all intervals are-'-stepwise except for a number
of skips between G and C. Hovhaness achieves harm~nic neu-
trality through the preponder~nce of time during which G
sounds in the canonic 1ine,- the lack of available notes, and
the presence of strong harmonically suggestive skips which
anchor the harmonic background to G. This quality is enhanced
by the use of a G-D drone pattern in the timpani. Except for
------ce-rtain susta~pep -held-GIs, -the-line -sounds new notes, without
ties or rests, on every beat. Even with the held GIS, the
counterpoint is' spaced closely enough that each beat is sound-
ed by most of the voices, if not quite all. Rhyt~c interest
is created by this ostinato effect of attacking all beats,
and enhanced by the variety of rhythmic configurations given
to the perfect fourth G-C interval in the line (marked in
Ex. ~2 as Xl' x 2 ' etc.).
The St. Vartan Symphony (1950) provides several examples
of characteristic second period canons, many of which use
p01ytonal effects. The sixth movement is a typical one.
__ Only violins are used, and all four parts begin at the unison
at a distance of-l8 bars of ~ time. It is a vigorous allegro;
there is l1_i:tle syncopation and notes are struck on all quar-
ter-note pulses, and on nearly all eighth-note pulses. The
lines are predominantly stepwise, with modal -centers brought
118

Ex. 12. Anahid (1945)

68 ..A ~[[fJ ,

::fll"l't~~.~~·i$9·:I~I:~I:~I~:.i ~I
Ex. 12 (Conti~ued)

69

0=

-~- ... ...

"-ll ~1,;.~fi2-"nt7f.';J'-I[:,~.~I;TI!)"")b'-Jil~L,,':r]1[~'P.;,=
j'i--"=- "'---'r U-:;,.I----\,; -- '-.:,. . '-'="1 "-
-'-"v'j -- "'--.~-~

y
...
I Ii -;?L,lr11 au,j
,.
·~-"'-.:-~l-~-~-=-· -.
C{',ffiI,! D!QJ ",<;J~----~.- - .
1"=:::':=['_- =~J'
:::~~-~~.L::==":::~

\c. .?Irz;Q.=-10a:~ ~a~£tfl=:-..--=~~-,i;t~~il~aDL={,~


ca. 17~_'_ ~::;j- :=ti" m-:,J\G~'W
120

..
out by skips of perfect intervals to and from them~ and by
repeated notes.
The composer achieves effect'S of polytonality and stretto
through the following device. Thel' entrances are at 18 bars I .-.

distance. The material of the opening is repeated,. a perfect


fourth lower, by the same voi~e, after 19 measures. This
creates a one-bar stretto with the new voice, .presenting the
subject at two different pitches. Further, Hovhaness con-
tinues the process so that after 38 bars, the first voice re-
peats its 19-bar paragraph again a perfect fourth.lower~

. --ereat-ing'poly~~m?-lstretti-with-the new -voice and -the -middle


one. This is continued in the fourth entrance, creating this
result:

Ex. 13
:'-~
.y"
-/....,
\I
_·I~w"
- ..-
~=~

I r.~ ,Ill 11/


w
,

II
"_1.4
•1..

~
1\•
~

",:u.l''»
.,.
--";';"-;,q
......
,., U
...-
...
r.1
., f' --
I
.,.... .... I
~~
~

.....
I
....J
y
-,
;.,J

'"
I

.. ,
,....
...... £i .... , r.,
t~ rotr- "' A
1.1
-_.
I"" ',1 Ai I"
rv .. '"" n -m n I
,~~
'"'- t;-.-
!/
-'
"

"I
A fJ:J
I
-
V,b
I
ll )t8 ...
1 t"" n
I ....... A
rv ,,,-
-1!t
,F- r-
[:J - ft.p.nI
I
A
f;' I:it
I
#Or.
~ - P'
"'-

. - quoted
I,.'~ ,-. . ~.'~:':-':'.~
."'ZiI:d 1 .;.~ -=rJ .1 I
\:.~ ~

The '19-bar unit with some of the second entrance ~s

below (Ex. 14). Note the repetitions'of the first two bars
(marked by x). These further intensify the stretto effect
121

Ex. i4. St. Vartan Symphonl

Tlmp. @E+ 1-- 4


anI' . anf .

...- e:I
-. .
flmp
anI'
, , riff tnp
.,. or'

'fJ .• ~~ ..

IJ
- - -~~. oI!7""r §~a.o!..=p--~.+.
~ .~.= ..;::~ i=-"'- _
)(
.

--
.. ~

'In.! ~
dll'. II

'CI

~.
G
~lmp. : ".~ 2 d
rnr :r.p 1Ii'
122

with all voices present. In bars 5 and 7 one observes the


characteristic establishment of the modal center CD) through
the pe,rfect fourth skip and repetition of the note itself.
The entire range is a minor sixth, corresponding to the first
six tones of D Aeolian.
The polytonal overlapping of this material leads to
much parallel voicing at intervals such as the minor seventh.
Combined with reliance on stepwise motion, and the contradic-
tions implicit in the poly tonal emphasis on different centers
'in each voice, tras leads to a lack of harmonic directiono
.0 ---Instead,.-there is a harmon..ic blur, not entirely chromatiC,
but dissonant and unclear tonally. Moreover, despite the
rhythmic drive, there is little sense of rhythmic climax or
completion. These points are illustrated in the final bar;
observe the parallelisms in the two'pairs of voices, and the
. abrupt endi-ng (Ex. 15). Movement 11 of the work resembles'
the following exalllple, but is very brief, making it practice.l
to quote in full (Ex. 17). Here the entries are polytonal,
and five cpnventional string parts are used. The notes of
the entries are spaced strictly at upward or downward perfect
fifths (never fourths) so the five initial notes resemble the
open notes of stringed instruments in layout (Ex. 16).
In this case, the distance is 5 1/2 bars, but the mate-
rial of each line repeats itself, at pitch, after 6 bars.
o Thus polytonal stretti.are again created, but with a reversal
of the technical procedure of the sixth movement. The
123

. Ex •. 15

I, l 1
.. -
e _ .. --~-----.--
j

I' Cllit j

J ¥

Ex. 16

Q
e
b

polytonallty results from the entries, where it resulted from


the internal repetitions in the above instance.
Procedures such as this may appear overly schematic and
attention is therefore called to the order of entries as
. shown in Ex. 16. The patterns E-A-D-G-C or C~G-~-A-E would
be logical", but would not be tiringly predictable in such a
124..

.
short section. Hovhaness has chosen to provide variety and
subtle changes as the canonic te~ture progresses by choosing
a situation where the entries are less symmetrical.
The music of each part is entirely diatonic and there-
fore key signatures are used. The ending is different from
Ex. 15, in that instead of an. abrupt ending without reduction
of texture, we have a quick. but not instantaneous decay.
The 22nd movement of this work employs canon in still a
different way. Four sections of violins are used, and all
the imitation is at the unison, without any hint of polyton-·
-----ality. -First. a main subject is stated. It is repetitious,
and uses the interval of a perfect fifth to outline first D,
its actual tOni'c, and then F, a secondary center.
Imitation begins when· the music returns to D, and then
there are immediate entries at the unison every half bar.
As the subject has no notes other than D, F~ A or C on the
strong beats, the texture is very consonant despite the close
-overlapping of parts. The ensuing bars have the effect of a
wave of sound, rather than of actual counterpoint, since at
any two moments virtually identical notes are present, except
for interchange of voices. When the change from D to F comes,
one hears a change of harmony, over the two bars of time
needed for all voices t·o imitate the change. The effect of
·_thi~ new chord, climbing, as it were, out of the old chord
in very slow harmonic rhythm, with ra~id part-writing, is
rather striking.
;: 125

Ex. 17

Allegro ():i44)
~II
Violin 1 ~rr~:t~~.:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

J Il
Violin 2· p';.~..:=±=~
Ci I
~. ~.

I~
-
~.~.
Viola.

~. --.-.. . -~

;::~::~r,~7":l~
I~" - ~ 1:;:io-:~
126

Ex. 17 (Continued)

~~II
~~ +M·..-P- ._ .;..
_----.
.... ... . . ~.-6..,.:t:J> ........, ~
Y1D.1j ~ ==- _~~4 ..
- .-
~: ..-----... - ""';---.-
:-.:-~ -. ~

VID.2(
-t)
,0:0-"

c:::;.:;:s

.../! .:.
.-
- -. .t=F.:
. ........-
.
-=

- -- .
~,;.~--~
VIa.. . _,~--:::::t:!:

f ----- .::;:.:c,;

Vlc. - ~ ~
_.-
r--
Cb. .
. - -
...
-

__ ";'.9. ... ",",


Cb. ----< '.;: ~tr.
\

- '-
~.
- ~=
. ~-:;:''"'i-,..~

~ .. ~ -
.; .;
-
_.:::::><Zl"..7.-?- ~~-S:E~~
-~
. ~~§~~~
~

~~:>-j~---~
VIc.

.J. -> -
127

Ex •. 18

Allegro (J:16S)
Timpc.ill
InAD
Glan'
Tam-tam

Vibraphon e ";r-:;
v
: J'
"
_-e>- .. .
..-
.".~?- ..
- ,...
~ .
- _~1!_

Violin 1
IIlv. ~ I' -
VioUn 2
IIlv. {~~
tJ Sensa mi~llra
pis!: .. .. .. L l
.
Viola ~-=i
:pp - ~ _ .... ='.=r-"
.Bepeai-antl rc;eat, murmur
Violonoell o ~-'-

Gontra.bas S 1-0

"
~
.
'Iimp

Tam-tam
- -
Vibr . ,eI".'
JI ....
-- ~
~~

.. ........... _.. ~*4f.~ -f!.?~_ t!.-.o-. _:tt=f!:.~.-fJ->t!L ~


- ---*
Vln.1
div. { ~
~;-.:! -';;.

.
Vln.2.~
IIlv.

VIa. ~-; - •. ~

VIc. !
)
~-
.-
I
. ::::; ---- -- -- - - - _L __ ..
1. ..- ~

....
if. ""Spirit
,ollntl~" rep tal a',,! repeat, 'n.l'nil~ nllr.t~er 0.1 time3,nal I'lallcd tOlet.~e'i ,ome .Ialter,
,ome I/o"..e>; murmur. .
128

Ex. 19

Timp.

Tam.tam
~:lo:
- --
T-'
- -
"
Vlbr
!eI
,fj
-.... .._-
< ..

.....
_.... .
- -.
-~--.-
..... •
---
-~ ... ~-

Vlo.i5
div. ( ~ f ,..
-
: ..<II!...,;
~

......... -
. - -. - '!.".. -~

~ f __ a

- .....- . .-.
Vln.25
divA ( ~ If •
-- • .....---
'-' .. . ,,. ~- ~-- .
- -
.~

.~~

eI
f
Vla. ',;i,

-=; : I' : C: I : I : I : :I
Vlo.

Cb.
"
I

...
129

When the line moves'back down to D the process occurs in


reverse. The end:

Ex. ~O

, I L .J.

is a bit more solid than others in this work~ due to the


sustaining of the final D in all voices.
The final movement serves as a climax in that it is long-
er and more complex than any of the several canonic sections
. that precede it. The piece begins with a canon on G for
"trumpe'ts ~ in ~. The centrality of G is confirmed by the ten-
dency to restrict most skips to those to or from that note.
Material included in the counterpoint contains many scalar
-lines~ but bqth slow and fast runs app~ar:

Ex. 2la
130

Ex •. 21b

.~ ..

This enables the music to be sustained somewhat longer


than other canonic episodes in the symphony. The voices ul-
timately break off, only to begin a new and similar canon,
this time in 182 meter. The second canonic subject is a bit
more insistent due to the quadruple meter and the insistent
- ---'-rei teration of the fifth degree. The two subjects are quoted
below:

Ex. 22

Ex. 23

Again the parts ultimately break off, only to begin


again, at six bars distance, while the strings begin a simul-
taneous canon, in ft and ~t a distance of one beat. The ca-
nonic subj~ct (Ex. 24) is related to Ex. 17.
131

Ex. 24

An overlapping pattern similar to that in the 22nd move-


ment occurs, except there is no change from the prevailing
G-Minor chord. Instead, after long reiteration of G, the
string texture proceeds.to A--cancelling the two flats, and
soon afterwards to B, where the entire ensemble, including
the trumpets breaks off abruptly. While the strings progress
from G through A to B, the trumpets retain their G mode. As
a result the ending. gains intensity first by the coincidence
of the two canons, and second by the gradual imposition of
the poly tonal remoteness between them. At the last bar (and
the end is absolutely abrupt and without preparation by sus-
tained tones or rests in any voice), the listener is caught
in an upward spiral of contrapuntal and polymodal pungency.
Hovhaness co~l.d easily have continued the process of upward
climbing in the strings to one of two natural goals. 0#,
the next step upward~ would bring the maximum polytonal re-
moteness--that of a tritone. To continue upward all the way
to G in the octave higher, would create the effect of upward
resolution. The decision to end after only two steps of
climb suggests that Hovhaness's intention. is .to create the
effect of a spiral which may continue in the .mind of the
132

listener beyond the actual termination·of sound. His ear


-·has been provided with the pattern and with fairly intense
juxtaposition of modality, but not with excessive reiteration
of the p!'ocess, maximum intensity of harmonic conflict, or
resolution.

~hird Period Counterpoint


. In the SOlS Hovhaness's interest' in counterpoint seems
to have waned slightly. There is no entirely generic poly-
phonic vocabulary. However, germs of the fourth pe:t'iod are
to be found, along with considerable. use of contrapuntal
types characteristic of the earlier periods. Usage of actual
earlier material 1s so frequent that it is impossible to say
whether very much of the counterpoint is new in this period
at all. First period fugues are often employed, sometimes
with enriched harmonic effects at the ends; this process
even occurs in the second period, as mentioned with respect
to the Celestial Fantasy. As for second period counterpoint,
one example is in the cantata Glory to God. After several
arias and fugues, which are "harmonic" rather than "non-
harmonic," the final double canon of the Ste Vartan Symphony
occurs as the finale of this work. Its effect is rather
strange in context, because it is hardly" as natural or logi-
cal an ending as it is in the symphony. This author conjec-
tures as follm'ls: Hovhaness used very little new music for
the cantata 0 The earlier movements, in particular the fugal
ones, appear close to first period style. 'toTi thout wanting
133

to compose'anew, he may have felt first period material would


--not make an effective climax. Secondly" there is an aesthet-
ic point in favor of, using just such ~n unexpected ending.
The highly rhythmic and evocative mood of the Vartan ending
may enhance and broaden the mood of religious jubilation,
heretofore brought out by music perhaps a bit too devout or
inhuman.
Nevertheless, there is also some' new counterpoint in
the period. r conjecture that the following examples were,
,in fact, originally composed in the 50's.
--In-the"-Su1te f'orViolin, Piano 'a'nCt Percussion· (1952),
one finds a canon very similar, to those of the second period,
with two exceptions. It is polytonal, with two entries a
full tritone apart. Even the most remote situations in
Vartan used no greater than a major third between polymodal
entries. The second exception is the' use of an added melod-
ic part, independent from the canonic parts, but in similar
J;·hythm and speed. This part is in a third mode, and the
three modes are not symmetrically spaced, as they generally
would be in the second period. The independent part itself
is more significant because it is an equal polyphonic VOice;
.. added ,coloristic parts occu:r in the second part, but they
function to add sonority rather than counterpoint.
Specifically, the piano and violin enter in A minor and
E flat minor with this ,material:
134

Ex. 25
...:

The xylophone plays a four-tone line in B Flat Minor:

"Ex. 26

The choice of B Flat maximizes the resultant minor sec-


ond dissonances created in combination with the piano entry.
This suggests fourth period practic~, as seen in Chapter IVo
. The use of added voices in con~rapuntal situations
exists also in other \'1ork~ of the .third period. Hovhaness
makes increased use of full orchestra and II symphonic" de-
signs and titling. Adaptation of this contrapuntal procedure
"~o such layouts leads to grandiose effects. In the Concerto
1\T,...
... v. 1 \.J.':;j
/., "53 ') , there is a canonic episode for strings entirely
in one mode. It would have been characteristic in the second
period. It is enhanced by the superimposition of slow ca-
nonic "material for brass, also in characteristic second
period style. The effect of the combination is quite differ-
ent from the similar combination at the end of Vartan because
of the greater exploitation of full symphonic resource and
135

the juxtaposition of .tempo. In the finale of Vartan, rhythm


is juxtaposed but, the strings and trumpets have simila! tempi.
Hovhaness's Magnificat (1957) is a work of avowed great
importance to its composer.' The work deliberately combines
many disparate elements creating something of a synthesis of
many elements of his style. (Canonic second period counter=
point is missing, but that period is represented by profuse
use of the "aria" style'mentioned in Chapter III.)
One feature is the, use of lIorganum," as the composer
puts it. Equal linea~ writing, in consistent parallel triads,'
. --characterizes some of -the -choral movements • Where this is
found in the first period, it is in passages of accompaniment,
or brief instances of harmonic coloration. The actual (and
perhaps questionable) practice, of tr~fing to provide lengthy
polyphonic interest through such writing is new in this
period. To the author's knowledge, the style of Ex. 27 is
unique to the Magnificat. It is certainly of the third
period, as follows from the'chromatic root movements result-
ing from it.

Ex. 27
136

In such works as Flowering Peach~' and the chamber works


of the early 50!s, non-harmonic p.assages with .extreme disson":'
ance occur--such as Ex. 25 of Chapter IV.

Fourth Period Counterpoint-


Dissonant Unison Canons
The turn towards Far Eastern thought in the 60's brings
with it a ne~ direction in counterpoint. Static emotion be-
comes typical of Rovhaness's intentions. Rapid rhythmic
drive and harmonic direction, which characterize the second
and first periods, respectively, become inappropriate. Al-
····-most· no-seconc;l,:",p~riod 'counterpoint"" is-l'ound in -the music of
the fourth. First period fugues are present, however, but
almost all seem'to be re-used examples. They appear in con-
texts where they often seem quite far from the natural voca-
bulary of the work. Hovhaness1s defense of this practice de-
pends on the metaphysical idea that religious feeling is en-
hanced, not contradicted~ by stating one's praise in as many
tongues as possible.
At any rate, the tyPical fourth period counterpoint is
characterized as follows:
l~ Canon, which has less character of develop-
.ment~ is greatly preferred OVRr fugue.
2. Canonic entries are invariably at the unison,
leading to "these effects:
-".
a. Closely packed dissonance is frequent.
b. There is no feeling of progression or
137

motion created by successi've entries •


. Hovhaness adheres to actual unisons, avoiding
imitation at the octave except where vocal or
instrumental range limitations force his hand.
3. Tempo is slow and meter complex, much of the
time. Occasionally the complexity of time is
sufficient to warrant the use of senza misura.
Note that these conditions are diametrically
opposed to those of the second period.
4.. There is no polymodality at all; the modes
employed are· rich in minor and augmented sec-
onds, as described in Chapter III.
5. Co·ntrapuntal episodes are shorter than in
other periods. This follows from the pre-
vious four conditions, all of which could
tend to produce monotony, and from the com-
poser=s overriding concern with sonority
rather than harmony or polyphony is this
period.
Some examples follow.
The orchestral ballade Floating World (1964) contains
many canons based in one way or another on the IIheroic theme fl
of the work (Chapter III, Ex. 18). One instance, for two
ba,ssoons, uses profuse glissandi and melodic and harmonic
ininor seconds:
Ex • 28
.
.
~ .

Richer and more ornate, yet quite similar, is a passage


·.for three flutes in the same work. The line is:

Ex. 29

The players receive the instruction liVery Free, It and,


after the entries, there is no requirement for exact coor-
- uination of parts. The close spacing of the entries (shown
by arrows in Ex. 29) and the melodic intervals of the lines
insure that the harmonic result will be a cluster-like blur
of notes of the mode. The 'canon is strict--including even
the dynamics, so that the parts a~e not of uniform loudness
at vertical moments. The canon ends, as do most in this
~eriod, without any attempt to fill out parts so they finish
together:
139

Ex. 30

-
-= .,

The falling off of voices one at a time causes the music to


revert back into silence gradually, as it ,began, creating an
arch. It is not a climactic arch, because there is little
sense of climactic buj.lding once all parts are present.
In the Beginning was the lvord (1963) is a work in which
the differences bet,\,leen old and new Hovhaness counterpoint
are quite apparent. There are two expansive fugues based on
ear~y symphonies of the first period--works no longer pre-
served in their original form. Other movements are entirely
within fourth period vocabulary, as described in previous
. ,chapters • An interesting c,ontrapuntal instance i.s the open-
ing of the ninth movement. Four woodW'inds have a canon
which,at first, seems normally modal and rhythmically simple.
Perhaps the first bar Qr two derive from some earlier ex-
cerpt. In any case, soon the line degenerates (or generates)
140

into closely pack~d writing, leading to strong dissonance in


the polyphony. It is an· instance where the change from
earlier neo-Renaissance style to later quasi-Eastern writing
seems almost to take place before one's eyes· (Ex. 31).
Sometimes canonic material begins in one tessitura and
continues through another, gradually bringing about a dis-
placement of texture. When this occurs, Hovhaness still·
avoids any other climactic devices, so that the effect is.
one of shift of color rather than creation or release of ten-
sion. An example, again using woodwinds, occurs in the opera
··-PHate ;(Ex. 32).
In some instances where large scoring is used, the poly-
phony involves many parts, either in one canon or two or more I

simultaneous ones. Due to the weight of the texture and com-


plexity of the writing, these passages are never lengthy. In
Symphony No. 19 "Vishnu," (1966) there is a simultaneous ca-
non (EX. 33) for three woodwinds and three trombones, in
-which the trombones at first seem to be doubling the wood-
winds a 12th lower. Afte~ the first five notes the parts
prove to be independent.
Fourth period counterpoint can be quite precisely de-
.__ scribed and the actual musical effects o~. any two character-
istic canons of the period differ very little from one another.
If whole musical sections were based on. these canons, or i·r
they often attempted dramatic Significance then this fact
",ould imply a weakness in the composer's invention. But" in
141

Ex. 31

...., ..
~
I?
b.
.~..,
..
~

f;J
•• -
F>'
I
-~
A I'"
I
,
o.
A"'
....-
r
- I""
I
.....C"E"l
"
'"
.,
;
-
:t=~
-

~JI
."'-
...-= 4..
C.
Jr

"
~
-

I!.f
.- I

-0',
,
I
...
T
-.
T
ft

-,
...
A

i
".'
,."

, ,,
1...£.0

Ie

.... ....
I]

~
""",1Iq
.:
"
L
-
-
L!
L L
C 1M
I
-
~

I
a
I

pr
.
I
-~

I
P'
••
--,.:
IW
""1'

. ..
- -.
tI
IIIli\
....
~
- -- 7..
.. -&:,.
.... ...
~

I
r~
I
t
-w
I
," '"
I

'W

tl~
~~
,_, I
- "'-1:I
I
6:.
r -

,
.
fhAI I I I

t -

, ,.'-' f7"iI> .
..n. ,1Io.1~.e., I ~:; • .:t
1.. 2>"""- I
[lFh: I I I I , I I I
...~I""
~

- h ...
" I .a,
, ,I
142

Ex. 32

fact~ these passages are usually found as introductions or


transitions. They serve as punctuations for form, vehicles
. for exploration of sonvrity and embodiments for exposing
--"'1llelodic and moti vic ideas 0 They aI,'e never forms in themselves,
and they would be quite meaningless if detached from the
works in which they appear--a remark which would be false
about contrapuntal episodes of any other period. However,
.-:'" .
they lend variety, textural diversity and atmosphere to the
strangely evocative music of the 6o i s. And they are still
another instance of Hovhaness's ability to adapt traditional
contrapuntal techniques in peculiar and personal ways.
143

Ex. 33

Oh.l

=-"--- -.
144

CHAPTER VI

RNYTHM, METER AND CYCLE

......

Rhythm is a particularly important component of


Hovhaness's music, but there is little rhythinic development
from one period to another. One finds most of the elements
of the composer's treatment of rhythm in the first two
periods, and very little new happens along these lines there-
after. Important stylistic characteristics are present with
very little alteration in all four periods.
As mentioned in the analysis of his melodic material,
Hovhaness often begins on the first Qeat of a measure with
short notes preceding long ones. Below are illustrative ex-
cerpts from each period:

Ex. 1. ~ymphony No. 1 (1937)

Ex. 2. Anahid (1945)


145

. E}:. 3. Koke No Niwa (1954)


I

Ex. 4. Bare November Day (1964)

In passages where "harmonic" counterpoint is present, .


the rhythm shows minimal originality in that the vocabulary
is virtually identical with Renaissance or Baroque practice.
This need not apply to accompanying vOices, which frequently
----have held chordal figures. These chordal drones are general-
ly of two types. Neither shows any rhythmic interest;
Hovhaness is willing to relegate rhythm, as he sometimes
relegates harmony, to a position where it is present but
-essentially neutral. The two types are simple held notes
and repeated chords of the type:

Ex. 5
146

Even ,so simple a development as the Brucknerian:

Ex. 6. Bruckner-Symphoay No.8

fJIJIJfJ i/J rJIJfJ

is absent as it creates too much rhythmic interest. Carrying


the analogy with har.mony even further, Hovhaness's use of
rhythm is either .quite strong and· important, or entirely sub-
servient. ,This is not as strong a generalization as that .
-- ·---~bout--harmony,-because -it is impossible ·-to ·explainwhether a
characteristic melodic figure such as Ex. 7 possesses any
basic rhythmic interest or whether its nuances derive from
melodic thinking.

Ex. 7. Anahid

Hovhaness frequently uSeS a rhythmic vocabulary of many


consecutive notes of the same time-value. The two basic
types include those where accents or melody create interior
rhythmic interest, adding to the motor effect of the repeated
.articulations, and those·where they do not. Normally, one
finds the simpler type in the first period and the more
147

complex type in the second period and thereafter.


J

, . Ex. 8. Vijag (1946)

Rhythmic Practices of the First Period


. The music of the first period is not very rhythm1c~ but
it exhibits certain traits important.in later Hovhaness. One
finds the follm'1ing styl~stic types:
a. Contrapuntal passages of a tlharmcnic" type in which
rhythm is used according to older models •. This does not im-
ply a lack of rhythmic interest~ only a lack of rhythmic
-. ·--originality. Sometimes a good sens~ of momentum is built up
.within this restricted re~lm. On~ finds, for example, a grad-
ual quickening in the Prelude and Quadruple Fugue (originally
written for string quartet in 1936). Each of the four sub-
- -jects (Exs. 9-12) is more rhythmic than its predecessor.

Ex.. 9

:,t@te If' J",


IE "'elf' J Iff'Gf~e?Eef4Y1J
.. . . ::./~.' ~ .
148

. Ex. 10

Ex.
, 11

Ex. 12

b. Short-long figures and beginnings on first beats, as


in Chapter III, .Ex. lor:

Ex. 13. Missa Brevis (1935)


149

(A similar figure in almost identical .rhythm occurs as late


as Symphony No. 16.)
c. Passages where the same time-value is used in motor-
ic repetition:

Ex. 14. Symphony No. ·1 (1937)

These are usually Simple, in that qross accents are not


suggested by melodic notes, notated acceht .marks, or rhythmic
accompaniments.
d. Chordal (as distinguished from linear or percussive)
accompaniments are not rhythmically· aggressive. Quick per-
·cussive chordal attacks used by other modern composers are
absent.
This leads to one rather important remark, characteris-
ti~ not only of the first period but of Hovhaness's entire
output. When there is rhythmic interest, and there frequent.-
1y is plenty, it is always cumulative-~createdby patterns of
notes, not by the effects of single notes. One may refer to
the fortieth symphony of Mozart, for two examples.
Continuous eighth-note accompaniment as in Ex. 15 is
quite natural to Hovhaness. Despite the melodic upbeat, the
tl'10 quarter notes at x would be characteristic for him. The
150

Ex. 15. Mozart-Symphony No. 40.(1st Movement)

Ex. 16. Mozart-Symphony No. 40 (4th Movement)

rhythm juxtaposes moving eighth notes and quarters without


undue dwelling on any note. The interest is created by a
continuing flow of notes of the two possible durations.
Ex. 16 is entirely discontinuous. The strong accents with
intervening rests instead of notes are foreign to Hovhaness's
conception of rhythm. If Hovhaness were to use ~hords in
such a forceful way he "'0uld be likely to conform to his
more static style by using even note values, i.e.ld,J'fJtJtf
.~ins tead of J f ~ E, J ,a J
I t~I .

Hovhaness's Mature Rhythmic Practice


Although the main direction of Hovhaness's exotic inter-
est just after 1943 was to\,lards Armenian thought, the changes
in his rhythmic practice demonstrate not only that interest
J.5l

but also his fascination with other' Eastern cultures. This


may derive from his youthful int~rest in Indian mueic. One
also finds a somewhat independent new interest in song and
dance--the vocal and physical man'1"festations of emotion (such
as faith) in all international cultures. The attention to
song leads to the "aria" styl~ of this period which is rhyth-
mically gentle and achieves its effects through melody and
harmony. The attention to dance and related processional
and intrada-like sections is much more important rhythmically.
This interest combines with the incantory repetitive quality.
--- --of--A-rmenlana~~ ~ther ·-Eastern --chanting,--and -the -composer's
affection for Baroque and pre-Baroque dance music of the
west; this leads to individual rhyt~c characteristics in
the second period.
One area not yet effected greatly is that of meter.
Hovhaness's meters tend to change rather rarely within a sec-
tion. There are t\,lO exceptions. First, harmoruc counter-
pOint, especially when neo-Renaissance in nature, sometimes
leads to changes betl'Teen 2 and 3-beat bars. Second, in some
works, mostly in the third period, complex meters are simpli-
fied as follow's: A pattern such as '11, in which there are
recurrent groupings such as 4 plus 4 plus 3, is written not
in 11 at all, but in alternating 4, 4 and 3-beat bars.
Mus~orgskyemploys an.analogous technique by writing an 11
meter in the opening "Promenade" of Pictures at an Exhibition,
as alternating 6 and 5-beat bars.
152

The meters employed in the second ·period are still large-


'ly classical. Not insignificantly, an example of 7-meter .
occurs in a section that is otherwise a bit ahead of. its time
in Hovhaness's career: the passage in the St. ~artan Symphony
that relies heavily on "constructed" sonority (Chapter IV,
Ex. 22). There are other instances of 7-meter but they are
not frequent.
Hovhanessfs rhythmic language from the second period on
has several important cl:laracteristics including the follo\,ling:
l.. A strong main pulse is present, what one might
-call--a"tactus,U -referring to 'earlier Western
music. This is usually quite well articulated.
Not only does Hovhaness tend to strike first
beats, but he also tends to strike other beats.
Ties or rests at beats are not frequent. The
tactus is usually as fast as - the quarter-note,

and sometimes as fast as the Sixteenth, par-


ticularly in pieces where drone effects occur
or Eastern instruments are im te~ted. Ex. 17
is an example of quarter note tactus; note
2'
that each beat in the 4 meter is actually
struck~ Ex. 18 is· an example' of rapid tactus.
The first type fits into Western metric pat-
terns, where the second must be written either
in constantly changing meters or senza misura.
Ex. 17. Anahid (1945)

;iffl J r IEta I;} DI '


- .

Br IfilJ &,1 ., w;;gli


"

;~
.' ..
. . . ." .. ', ~ ,... ' ",
. .. '

.
'ft1t IJ:J JI*J '11\ ¥Q \'M!:_r..• I . •. t"'~. '.: '" ": "• .

Ex. 18. Lake of Van Sonata (1946)


/
. - ·-Senza. tffivr4 .

~e:t?~!:~,~,~-~~
2. Quick-note groupings are used to create or to
vary intensity. Sections often begin with few
quick-note groups and have more and longer
groups as the piece progresses. Often these
coin~ide with rises of' melodic line.
154

..
Ex. 19. Ana-hid , '

, ..

~e I p,(q'e Ir Ib E1 P' eIe- b,;~I;m 1 = ~~

1(iD 1liJ'1r=rttr IttErlruJ l_e1


--I,r' at 1Sii:r I~ Iqjil]I.tt:f~l~q.
. .

0) ~~ _ .. •

3. Melodic stress, rhythmic cr'oss-stress and gen-


eral variety are afforded by long notes. AI-
, mos~invariably the notes chosen for prolonga-
tion are prominent notes of the mode. In Ex.
20, the G is a member of the tonic triad (E
Minor) and occ~rs strongly~ but in cross-
rhythmic positions relative to the meter. It
occurs at 5-be~t intervals in ~ time. '
·155

Ex.' 20 •. Anahid

4. Cross rhythmic'effects are also created by the


use of instrumental texture. Another example
from Anahid, in itself something of a handbook
of the. composer's rhythmic palette in the sec-
5 ' 7
ond period, pits 16 against 8 meter. Note that
the timpani take one of the two conflicting
rhythms with no f~rther instrumental support:

Ex. 21. 'Anahid


's.~rv .
-•
"

,"7 ~ JI1<-=I -
I -.: to.. I ~
, ~
- .......I
"
, :j~
...... -
(\ ..I. _ 10
..,...
• 'fl
, .t ,
I l,.;;::,r. ,
'........vv
I'M

........
..I ..I A ..I
-.-
,
"" t:;
~~ .... I.:J
f
OJ n "
.01.
v "'V~ .... -" ....
"
'V

- 1 - - - - - ; - - - - - - --:~-: ,. - - , . --. _. - ----- -- - -- ---- .-- _. - . _._- ----- ._-- - .. .-;-::-


-n~, .. .
...
,{ ( r;: .. - ~--r;~ - -
-'"
,- ,
iO· .. ·. '--'~ " I', i""ri~ bl -',
~-:A~
.1' -~
t<k}j~ k}~..1.1 I...I.J .J rOr-rv ..J..J..J.J l.lrI
......... V"',,'''
1...1""...1 .J...t :.rIA..! A I :;rJ:I.L.l . .J.lt'..rY{ 11lW\1~ ..!lIn
·.,..,v
r.. , .. "V
, , ,
I ......... v

.,."
.L Ir. IV-" IV .. .... '1 'VV I"''"'''''VI- VY·
~ al\Q II II .01.
'!o "':
'- ) 3 !!'
!It
" ) ....

This extract occurs within a long section in


which timpani provide various opposing metric
156

designs to a predOminant,~ in, the other parts.


The nature of this ~'iS itself an example of
the next characteristic.
-j.-
5. Hovhaness sometimes employs not only a meter,
but a consistent rhythmic pattern. This is
usually a one-measure design, and may be re-
ferred to as a "tala," which, is the corres-
ponding term for such meter-rhythm patterns
in Indian music. This has been referred to
in Chapter III, with respect to late works,
.- ·---butit-can alsobe--foundin the ,- second period
in passages which are essentially melodic.
It occurs more frequently where complex meters
are used. Just as in Indian music, certain
talas become frequent in actual use.
Hovhanessfs talas are usually quite short.
Notational complexity-is avoided and the ac-
cents are usually strong. They are closer
to Indian models than similar techniques em-
ployed by other composers, such as MeSSiaen,
whose talas are longer, more complexly notated,
and more spacious and less driv~ng in effect.
However, despite the closeness in feeling to
Indian examples, Hovhaness's talas are newly-
composed and personal. As indicated in the
follovdng examples, they usually involve the
157

persistent trait of short notes preceding long.,


,/'
One Hovhaness tala is: I, J ~ ~ tJ J • This
meter usually has a secondary stress on the
',first half note. Among its interesting proper-
ties are ' these: a. It is characteristic of
the tendency to use ,short notes earlier in
measures. b. It is relatively simple, con-
taining no short notes. These are usually used
to vary the music. If the tala itself contained
short-notes~ it would be harder to' provide vari-
--ati:on without obscuring tl')e tala's ideriti ty ..
, ,

. c. It is the conjecture of this author that


this particular tala represents Hovhaness ',s
musical signature. Where Bach (B-A-C-H) and
Shostakovich (D. Sch., corresponding to D-Eb-
C-B) used melodic signatures, Hovhaness
chooses a rhythmic signature. The last two
syllables of his last name should be a bit
prolonged in good pronunciation, and the "vhanll
clearly is a point of stress. The rh~thm

lJ J J J J
Alan Hovhaness
clearly r~:p:resents the' name'

quite well. The tala oC'curs in Anahid, the


4th S~phony The Leper King (a work which may
well be autobiographical) the 19th Symphony,
Reguiem and Resurrection (see Chapter IV,
Ex. 42) and many more works. The preponder-
158

ance of occurrences certainly lends credence


to the idea that this tala has special sig-
nificance.
Tala, usage, and complex meters, are often associated';
with chordal declamations. Where texts are involved, the
word accents often create the tala. In Praise the Lord with
Psaltry (1968) the words "Prait;;e the Lord, 0 My Soul" are
as socia te d with thi s '':'d.la:

Ex., 22

f J
Praise the Lord, ~ My Soul
The words "That Was the True Light" lead to a slightly
more complex tala in In the Beginning "Tas the 1'lord (1963):

Ex. 23 .

ff J J o
+
Tha t 1-Tas The True Light
The last is a prolongation of the 4~ignature tala
achieved by lengthening the last two notes.

Cycles
Both musically and spiritually, the use of cyclic
'rhythmic patterns "Tas an 'important innovation of the second
period. Musically it afforded rhythmic variety and cross-
159

stress. It added drive, and helped generate cumulative rather


-than climactic effects. Spiritually it represented a refer-
ence to the heavens. The composer was interested in astronomy
in his youth. He reconciled his musical interests with his
wonder at the precise and grandiose ~la.netary movements with
this technique. The cycles represant orbits. It is not
surprising that this technique begins l'lhen he was re-assess-
ing himself and turning deeper into a quasi-cosmic, a11-
embracing mysticism.
The technique may be described quite simply. More than
------one -part must be present ~ even if g1 vento. one player, as in
the manner of solo works of Bach. Each cyclic part plays
a precise and measured pattern over and over, possibly with
changes of dynamics or pitch, but never with rhythmic altera-
tion. The duration of the pattern,· which may and usually
-does include rests, gives the period or number of the cycie.
Naturally, all sounding parts need not play cyclic music.
'1"'0 are sufficient, and ev.en one occurs in situations where
the non-cyclic voices establish a fairly regular rhythm that
conflicts with the one cyclic part. In the final Doxology .
of Magnificat the bell is in a cycle of 5, and the tamtam in
a cycle of 13, but the other parts are not cyclic£
In the ensuing example, the 5-cycle is fairly percepti-
ble. Both·perceptible and obscure types occur and the choice
of the number period i~ sometimes governed by this considera-
tion. Factors in this choice include the following:
l60

'.• <.... _.. -


Ex. 24
161

1. To establish the independence of the cycle pat-


tern and to create the cro~s-rhyt~s desired,
the number chosen is often prime, other than
two or three, or a composite number with fac-
tors other than two or three.
2. l'lhen two or more cycles are present simulta-
neously most are primes, and.those which are
not have few common divisorse
3. The shorter the pattern, the more easily the
ear hears it as a pattern of repeated sounds
of a constant periodic duration. Hence, 1mi
numbers lead to the most striking and obvious
cyclic effects. 5 and 7 are often used for
this purpose. Large numbers create very subtle
--cyclic effects barely perceptible as such.
Note that the factor of perc~ptibility depends
less on dynamics and scoring. Naturally,
these play some role, but the role of the
_______ cycle numbe1" usually seems to be _greater.

-Occasionally the cycle has a clear pattern of change


- -
within itself. In such passages the repetitions are not of
equal duration, but differ in some uniform way. This resem-
bles a comet's path as opposed to a planetary orbit. An in-
stance of thiS, whe~e the cycle is 14, 13, 12 ••• 1 ••• 12,
13, 14 occurs in the Sto Vartan Symphony.
162

The cyclic excerpts given below include music from the


second$ third and fourth periods~ all of whicp use. cyclic
procedures.
1. From Sosi-Forest of Prophetic Sounds (l948)
The slow opening prelude of this work presen..l· the II pro-
phetic sounds u in mysterious quiet rumblings of the basses,
strange held note figures in solo horn~ and soft~ sustained
gong strokes. The cellos and violas hold a perfect fourth
drone~ giving body to the texture and clarity to the modal
final. The violins have the melodic line, and it is not
·-cyclic,; ·though i:t--does· ·;involve···raga-like ·note'repetitions.
In general, even if cyclical material has melodic identity,
it is not used 'for melodic purposes. When melodic appeal is
desired, it is added by a part kept free of cyclic restric-
tions; this enables it to have variable accents and phrase

*
lengths. In this passage~ the three instruments using cycles
appear thus at the beginning, where the si'gil indicates the
b~ginning of a new period of cyclic repetition.

Ex. 25.
-Sosi .1,(,
; '~t'I ,,~-,. ~

-
.
I'A"""'" ......
- ,...
'""'\or., ,~
.""
- ..
,,~ tit=-
~,

"" ~I
...- '0
~ 'V
.... If
r" .. ~

-
I
I
I
_ C

(;~~
. '4 * .~ ,
- ,
l!>I..,cr

-
I~,

.,.,'" - . .",.
~
.....
(:
~~
c; r: ,C t:t

1
ti~'
1'" I ,-~
-~
oJ to ,
ti> ...
.1 .!t' G. .*".,
;) S.1 t·~ " r-
,0-
AI'>
.... V ~.J
l~
: ..
I
, .,.:I
,. P I
""
f:
I I .
• t.'
... I
,
I)
I
In
I ,
( ...
I I
I "I I r

'.'
'. , (-)

f( n
I
.~
.u".L
I tll .
I
(
I~
~
The basses have a large number of notes. They are in a
cycle of one period every 18 quarter notes. -The gong, by
contrast, has a pattern with exactly one note, occurring
once eve-ry 14 quarter notes. If no _other cycles were present,
a more natural description of these two parts would refer to
the ratio of 9 to 7 half-notes. 9 and 7 are much more common
for cyclic use than the even multiples. The horn part, marked
in the score rr1ike a conch,rr is restricted to two notes. The
A is always held quite long, and the G is always very short.
The cycle is 33 quarter-notes. The pattern has some internal
______ r_epeti tion, as, in fact, does the ba'ss pattern. (The last
three notes duplica~e the first three.) This does not con-
tradict the technique. The period~-33, is the number of
beats of the entire pattern. Stated othen1ise,-the period
is the smallest number such that the music consists of exact
repetitions of that number of pulses, recurring regularly at
that distance in time.
Hovhaness seems interested here in a rather complex, but
yet very spacious texture. The scoring uses instruments from
three different instrumental families. The patterns are very
different, including one of one long note, .one ~f many short
notes and the horn pattern \'lhich has some characteristics of
both. The static impression derives somewha-t from the chOice
of relatively long periods for the cycles. The higher num-
.bers make for less aggressively obstinate cycle effects.
The restriction of quick quarter-note motion to the pizzicato
basses adds to this effect.
164

2 •. From Piano "Quintet No.1 (1927, rev. 1962)


The brief opening movement features the viola. in melodic
writing in the signature 4tala referred to above. The ac-
companiment; is entirely cyclic. "''l'he violins are rhythrrJ.cal-
1y together and playa pattern of two quick-notes, .identical
to.each other, but variable throughout the movement. Their
period is 29. The cello plays an upward glissando ·once in
19 beats, and the piano has ~ very rapid notes once every
23 beats. The instruments act essentially as percussion
parts; the pitches are variable and of the least importance •.
----The cello I s g~~s:;ando, the choice of dissonant chords for
the two violins, and the rapid piano part all lead to a blur-
ring effect negating any harmonic roie to the ~ycl.ic pc.rts.
Wri tten \'l'i thout regard to pitch, the parts appear thus:

Ex. 26
~, j¢ I #~
• ~

Ie
....
bo'''''' .. '.
~
n •• ".
ton
'I""
If~
-
"T::lML
I]"
-~ ...
,~

1f..
"
.. .-- ~--*-.- --_. .. ~-- ---- .- - --- -- ..- - 1

'X/~
ni\
- -'-'--'-- r--
'%
~
f.
-~
~ .. ' II
- .. -I! -~
.u -r
I~
A
-
I' I f:

-. -, .- --- - -- .. -- -- - •.... - -. --.


~
- .- ' . .... _-- -
~1I."\2 • ~

,
-I

J
I
A

~~r'"
~"'-'

-
I ....
IA - II
c;
-"I.'
~
1"lI'"'
-
.~
II
co, ... L
J'
~-"""

-
~ K" )1('

The cycle numbers 19, 23 and 29, 'areconsecutive members


of the set of prime integers, all of which are fairly high.
165

Also, as most of each cycle comprises rests, the. overall in-


~trumenta1 effect is very sparse. Yet each interp9lation
by these instruments is quite colorful, for s1mi1ax instru-
mental reasons to those which neu'fira1ized the harmony. One
can easily think of the viola line as a constant static state
of mood, with the cyclic part~ providing contrast and rhyth-
mic complexity" adding a little intensityand.creating "points"
of color. (Hovhaness uses the expression "points of sound"
for passages like this, but he usually has in mind tone-colors
that fit the image even more closely" such as vibraphone
. -----sounds.) --The:· r.na~n ·meter ·and tala is in-7" ··another-·prime·num-
ber" and (obviously--since all numbers involved are primes)
relatively prime to the cyclic parts~ In view. of the brevity
of the section" and the sparseness of the texture, it is
questionable whether the listener could rea1.ize (,\,lithout
actually counting beats) that cycles were involved. However,
one may justify their use by saying that to have written the
·parts otherwise might indeed have created qUickening, slacken-
ing, or syncopating of these entrances, destroying the de-
sired rest state.
3. From Symphony No.4 (1958) .
Near the beginning of this ~ymphony for wind orchestra,
a solo bass clarinet has a modal line with cyclic percussion
accompaniment. Later.there is a similar passage with contra-
bassoon solo, and it is ,very difficult to hear either of
these unw'ieldy soloists in most performances.· These may be
166

rare instances of orchestral miscalculation on Hovhaness1s


part, though one may say that this is not due to the nature
of the passages or accompaniment but simply to the use of
such instruments for solos in the first place. In other
words, it does not appear the solo could have been made to
stand out more than it does. There are four cyclic voices.
Glockenspiel, vibraphone and marimba play only one note in
each cyclic period. The note changes· each time, though it
is always foreign to the bass-clarinet mode. One kettledrum,
·tuned to Bb, has a somewhat more complex pattern, including
--two -bursts of--sound per period, --one. o·f-·which is -only one note,
while the other is a typical short-short~long.

The period numbers are 11, 13, 17 and 29. These are
moderate in length, except possibly for the 29, which is the
one with the two groupings of notes~ The cycles are slow
enough to a-void creating any insiste'nce or a rhythmic osttriato
but they are quick enough, as well as colorful enough instru-
mentally to exert a perceptible brightening effect on the en-
tire texture. The clarinet is in ~ time, simple but relative-
ly prime to all the cycle numbers (Ex. 27).
4. From Sextet for Violin and' Percussion (1967)
In the Allegretto movement of this l'lork, the unusual
combination is deployed as follows. The violin has a Simple,
sprightly modal line. The effect is dance like. The per-
cussionists play four ~ettledrums and a bass drum. The form-
er are tuned to the notes A, C, D and E. Each cycle contains
167

Ex. 27

"'p .. :x. •


i~
r""JA
,
.,.A
'.
,.....
~

I ...... "" ....


I'"' 'V" ""
to

"
."
r
fI,

'.
,1...4
- --
-: .
_•. _4. _ _ _ _
- .. -- .. _._-_ ..... . ----- .-- . -_.- .. _----
If,,,:,,f,.
~
:
~ lx-
,,,,
IV -:I L
,
1\Ll.!4i
~
~
I'
r
I
.- ,, £
"'lA{

" - .'
L
-- -- --" lit'
'17
J
~

v¢wt,::, ._--. -.-- .,. . ~-"- .. -- ---- .. ---- .


,
--- _. .- •
l
. ,
•'*' ,.tl,- - .~ L
' "riJ-
'" '-
....
,~

• I.... X 1:1
,
J( I-

.,. . *..
Iil. l' £
I"~ .....
~,~""
" .
.. '
:.
. ~:f • • .,'

-
'

I., ~

-
.,' ».
...
"
- L ,

i •
.. - .. ---~-:-- ~

- tI
II


one Qurst of sound of one beat length in 4 time, but the
nature of the burst is different with ea'ch p.art. The A drum
and the bass drum have one stroke, the C dram two equal
strokes, the D drum three equal strokes, and the E drum five.
The number four, which is not a prime and is too closely re-
lated to two, is not used. The cycle numbers continue this
168

pattern of Simplicity by using the four consecutive primes


above three; the four timpani have the cycle numbers 5, 7, 11
, ,

and 13. The bass drum, meanWhile, has the period of l6--once
every four measures. It differs from normal cycle function
in that it confirms the main metric design, rather than add-
ing further complication to it. The parts all begin on the
initial beat of the movement, making for quite a din at that
pOint. The effect created by this cyclic passage is at the
opposite pole from that of ~ (Ex. 26). The music is made
direct, forceful, and animalistic. The periods are short

Ex. 28
rI' *~~
i
.*• 5 ~=
~, ~
~",""-''''.:l
..-
... .,' .,1.

r!~ .
-

'~."J
~
"fr \ .
' ..
":

" .....
- . ' IJ
/{j{
rt
lU
C';.
L
iii.
wuu~
I
lOlJ ED. ........
- ~ ,JO
11
~
,!
- -~
u
,-"
, I 'o'JlI •. -

.·i~
"
r ... tL-~ 'Ib

.
j
.,..
I

, '1?
"

IJi'i~ • "'" - .- ._._- :' : l~


-- --. ...:...:-;~. - -,-
- ~*, 3 .~! ···~·S',
:;.. ...
"
~,
~-Yil!;

, J
k
f
I

... ... .:.oJ


..I

tJ
..I
I ~
L

~
-- ~
.~
,
. ~
I
......
....... 14

-.-
---
.~-
,..
....
...1
... -
..('1...('}..,'"
I (;
'1.10

..~.
./J..

--_.- . ).~ ..
'- - J. 'j

,,
._- - .. , .. _- " - -_.- . - -.-.- .. ,

BO .' ~
.",
J

-" ...
" ","':
I.~ ,

,-
n
f6 ...,. •
.~
J t::
.,.
~ ... .4-

.
,1

. -- .. - - - . _._----,-".. -_ ..... --

enough and the parts many enough that drum patterns are
regularly audible to the listener, so that each occurrence
has less power than it might 1>li th slower cycles, but the
total has a Baroque st~ength and impulse. A different use
of similar instruments will be described below, in reference
to Wind Drum.
J.69

5. From Symphony No. 16 (1962)


Hovhaness I s verbal description of the first part of the
third movement of this l'1ork is suggestive of the atmosphere
not only'of the passage indicatsd but of much of his cyclic'
nru.sic: "The third movement is in the form of a mountain
range, mountains in pale sunlight. Cloud mists suddenly rise
and pass over the mountains. It The passage combines rhythm-
less writing fo~ divided second violins, pizzicato modal
cycles for first violins and basses, a drone cycle for cellos,
-and a pentatonic viola melody which is itself nearly cycli~,

. __Wi:f;h .the.same ..period -as -the .~ello· drone writing. -In ft time
the cycle numbers are 23 (basses), 28 (or 7 bars-cellos and
violas), and 53 (first violins). B.eth pizzicato cycles have
some internal repetition. The cello cycle ,is particularly
interesting, including an unusual high range which may con-
tribute to the suddenly rising "cloud mists" the composer
has in mind. The quadruple stop at the end of the first vio-
lins' cycle also contributes to this. However, a generally
even, static feeling predominates, enhanced by the choice of
such large cycle numbers.
An excerpt of the texture appears on the following
page.
6. From liind Drum (1962)
One of the central movements of this work is the "Dance
,of Black-Haired Mountain, Storm. II It is one of a number of
pieces by Hovhaness ,that uses percussion ensemble. (In this
o
~ 24· ]I . . ., . . 25
Possibly J- 96 ~ . -..• )(.
liolinsl [44-- .
! ~~aMisura . ml
:;I • ;; : i. j :! r rlcEq il.1 I~=: r
II
F tssfiPfi I .~I 10 J IJ J "¥3
'f -
~g(L.~~m~~~~ ... ;.-';:"'~. -- -- no=: ~--- ;-=,-:::----- "':;'::'-.:.:=-"'r :-~··,·~:",,~s§j§~~~~~~
U

_.

loltns2 i "'f pizz.. F~ce rhythm but vapid, repeat. aru1l'c~ not, totelfler. 1.2 : 11
~i.Ci=i1.~ .....
~;;;;:q==--=tj.-:
.. -
4f±::2 - pT~.;?
. :5 11----,
;. -~
."377??T.-!~
. '&-:$:.
~
·-·~:~}·:E-·
=::.. -~.§~~~~
\0
r-iIVlolas

va. ~
I'
1·00-

_..~
_....--:.
..=0====-1=~ f
-. ,--

-~.

VC.
AI. '14 ~
-- 1--.....

TTl f
"'1 np

'B~' .~¥If4_.
~-JllEf£~ 3 I t IF. F r ±
J.~ J
case~as in some others~ he adds a solo flute. Here it ap-
pears only in the trio of the section.) As percussion en-
semble combinations can be rhythmically direct but less
clear rOl' counterpoint or harmony ~ cyclic passages are 'K~i.:t

suited to them. Virtually all the material in this excerpt


is cyclic; the entire movement is quoted on the ensuing
pages.
The form is ternary, with each outer section containing
similar material and following a clear crescendo-decrescendo
curve. The middle section uses the flute. It is uniform ~n

------dynamics, and still-uses--cycles in the -percussion-parts.


Timpani, bass drum and xylophone comprise the percussion.
The numbers l3~ 19 and 23 give. the cyclic periods of
the first part. The xylophone has one note every 13 beats,
in each case a chord of two consecutive notes from the char-
acteristic mode Of. the whole of vlind Drum (See Chapter III~

Ex. 26). The timpani cycle of 19 and the bass drum cycle of'
23-each have four bursts of sound. In the case of the bass
drum~ each burst is one beat longer than the one bef'ore, and
is identical to it except for the addition of one beat of
music before the last long note. Moreover, the added music
is one quarter-note in the first case, a pair of eighths in
the second, and triplet eightm in the third. In the timpani~

eighths and sixteenths are mixed, and the two notes C and Db
·are both available, so the cycle pattern is not as simple as
the bass drum. Judging by length if' nothing else, the second
172

and third of its folir bursts a.re the strongest. Significant-


,ly; the dynamic arch corresponds to the coinc~denc~ of these'
two cycles, with the loudest markings occurring when the
strongest parts of the two cyc1es~~ccur together. The cycle
numbers are large enough for a passage of fair length without
too'many repetitions of the cycles, but not so large as to
make the movement any less powerful than desired. The 13
of the xylophone is the only" cycle which is short enough to
give the average listener to have any chance of realizing
the cyclic structure.
--In the--trio the flute part, discounting grace notes, is
in the 4signature tala. The xylophone continues its 13-
cycle with no ~lterationsJ thus uriifying the m9vement ,color-
istically, as a pedal tone might unify a passage harmonically
in Classical style. The bass drum b,egins p1,aying one long ,
note every 7 beats, but by the end of the trio its interpo-
lations are gradually extended, to make,a transition back to
its quickening-lengthening style of the first section.
The cycles in the last part are not quite the same as
those of the'first part. They are shorter and somewhat less
heavy, in that there are fewer prolonged bursts of quick
notes. The bass d~llU cycle is 7 beats, with quarter and
half-notes present. Within the cycle pattern the progress
is from short to long ,in a direct way, as in the first part.
The timpani cycle of 10 ,uses two of the four bursts of the
cycle of the first part--the tl'lO' shcrtest. The cycle of 13
173

in the xylophone continues unaltered.


The truncations of the cycles lead quite naturally to
shortening of the section. The same crescendo~decrescendo

pattern is accomplished in about half the time. Hovhane3s~

seems to have judged that a complete restatement would make


for exhaustion. As written, the "mood is recapitulated ef-
ficiently and tightly, with :l.ntensi ty, but without "undue
length.
A relative of cycl~c procedure is the technique where a
cycle-like pattern is written out only once, with the indi~

""---(!ation to repeat i t·over and over again, senza misura, wi th-


out strict coordination. This leads to music with rhythmic
intensity and yet quite arhythnuc in conception and overall
effect. In such music, tone color takes on extreme importance.
This material will be discussed fully in Chapter VIII.
'.'

Ex. 30. 1'1ind Drum

·34 .XC Dance of BlaCk-Haired MOW1tain Stonu" .j

,.
.

--

mpam
. .An~ cO'i mota J= 100
~ ::"'"!:
r:.I!=F,',~:c:.c:=:~

pp
-_- _- ...,-
=f&
.....
,
...
i;.

p
I.~
I"I?'~C
,
~
.,(>

trip
-
I 'fig niltd.v~ds.
.
o~wn . i§j§f ---.-r~ •
0
Let- .s.7VFlds ~ 17k.
. I. ,

-
ILA .Po nil! a'dII~nPI'sr;um/.r.I LdSO~T
'~I
1&9
:

'Jphone 1!t:-. 3
• .:;:c::
I
'.I
·1
I
175

Ex. 30 (Cont1nu~d)

.' 55

BD.

iI . 1)rnp.
[" .
I
I
I

.j ~
i ../
Tj1l1p. !til
-'----
I

BD. .-.

.~yl. :C~
~
,1 I
~

. --,., .,- - ._- -. ...


116

Ex. 30 (Con~inued)

" ,
36 "
,', (J- J ) "
PI. "
~ ~~ ....... ~'"
~
p ,
I~',
~

!imp.
- -- ..... - - 0-

I
,
pp

BD. I
-pp .~,
X~
Xyl~
I"... "
, C:cr·
- .
,
.':'
.-
'01
ff H
1\ J( J(
" I(
.
Fl. .. :01-- ' ;w,.;j"
.......
............. ' O\!~~.;~~,_
' I r-r-' ,.' I -... .!..~-

, -I. I-
l limp.
~
,
i' • !'

ED., b: -_ 1
>.c~
"t- '
....... !
~~
IfE
!
,...",=, "i.-L
.~
;.,::=::
I

I I p
I
p~ :>rt' I2 I
l'
~.
~,~
t. . -' 0i~~
.. = t : ';1'l
<II-
= j

.,
",

...•.. -.~ ... -.- .... ...........


~ -- -. -.- . '
177

Ex. 30 (Continued)

37,
,, i

i
i
!. .(.1-.1)
Timp.
~

t:::t:::::.t=...
-
.......~

~i!Z ! ~~
! . p p ,n-'P
'"J1

J~ -
I ~.'
, .%/ r, 1 '

7 BD. I

P
-
tmjJ~J
~I
~--

X
~.... "
'I

I
X-y.l. ~kL~
... - -ti
, ff
~~
'- .,
~!)5'

- ~ ~

: . ,', Timp,
J
~'ri .-.

..-:/' .
:l!1t":_' - ~ ... ?; - l - ?==r;-~
;=

..
x., f
x'.
(.
,
f
~; I
-
,

. -.....--.. _··.-··-13 D.- I I


c. .

-r
5-1' 4

II
....I"
tl"
ntf

-
X,
'.
--
,
f
-
F ~
----=I
.;..
.. - "':I

:::::::I
',;

'""'t-.--.--=-------. _ _ _ _ _- . : _..... "'.'_" ......,


178

CHAPTER VII

SCORING I (CONVENTIONAL)

Hovhaness's instrumentation is an important reason for


his success and frequent performances'~ His scoring is at- .
tractive and sometimes exceedingly colorful.· The writing is
quite playable for the individual performers. Extreme ranges.
are avoided, and the ensemble effects are rarely difficult to
coordinate. Usually there is a clear identity to any orches-
tralpart; it is either melodic, co1oristic, or part of a
static accompaniment. The players ~an e~sily determine when
they are meant to sound prominent, and when not. Melodic and
coloristic parts are usually quite simple 'to play, but are
attractively idiomatic. The music ~s pleasant and satisfying
for the performers.
Tp~s fortunate situation derives somewhat from the other
elements of Hovhaness's style. His melody and polyphony tend
to use stepwise intervals. Recurrent rhythmic patterns with
few'metrical changes are easy to perform. For these reasons,
many Hovhaness passages would be easily playable and still
very expressive no matter how they were scored. Most instru-
mental idioms include that 'style of broad, stepwise, spacious
melody, that is so characteristic for Hovhanesso In many
cases themes appear several times in one work played on dif-
~erent solo instruments, with equal ease. Hovhaness's ten-
dency to use the same material in different works also is
179

facilitated by the versati1it~ of his style with respect to


.. 1nstrumental use.
The sixth symphony (1959) contains one theme which is
among the·most beautiful written by Hovhaness. The theme i~

five phrases long and has the range of a ninth, It is stated


first by clarinet, then oboe, then by strings in fugato,
Woodwinds and horn play it at the climax of the fug~e, after
which a solo violin (with the accompaniment also in single
violins) has it •. The last statement employs horn and trum-
pet in alternate phrases.

Ex. 1

f ~'. .. ~ .. ...3.., ....3..,


if J Ef¥i~ 1·1 r · IJr r i®ftj I c If f' pJ J IJ r' I
. S 3 .
;£1(. f l!hj! I tfetrrJlr e~ ! r rt I
Q

l~rtt.IO IfClbIJf'! Erne .10 I


. I

In all of these passages chordal accompaniment is provided


by string orchestra. The fugato uses strings for all voices,
with occasional woodwind unison doublings for emphasis only
.( see Ex. 24). More generally note these facts:
1. When any two linas have similar roles, they
are assigned to members of' the same ins.tru:-
mental choir.
2. (Conversely) When a mixed instrumental group
or "broken consort" is bmployed,,·the texture
:Ls heterophonic.
In particular, strings are employed frequently for all
types of roles, and are called upon almost exclusively for
chordal accompaniments. Winds are most often featured in
melodic or polyphonic situations. All instruments are em-
ployed" in one way or another" for coloristic roles.
--.-Hovhanes~.' s.methods-.of .. orches.tration ·Ci.onot ··appear·to
change greatly from period to period. However, the actual
sounds do change" because of the effect of cha.nges in other
elements· of his style. Basically" as the composer turns to
different national influences" the nature of heterophonic
texture is altered. Therefore, the discussion in this chap-
ter is not organized by periods but rather by treatment of
.. different instruments and instrumental groupings •

.. '~Neutral" Scoring
It is appropriate ,to examine Hovhaness 1 s instrumental
mannerisms first in those situations where no coloristic
parts are present--where the scoring serves to give voice to
melodic, harmonic and polyphonic ideas. We have already
. nClted that Hovhaness uses similar instruments for similar
roles. In aria passages, which are prominen~ in the second
period" one frequently finds solo winds set off against the
181
.'

Ex. 2. St. Vartan Symphony (1950)

1~r. Aria
(S&<:red J. . Qve)
Anda.nte (J:98)
Tromboll e I I I I
II ..--..... .....---.... ~ r.--.. .~. .~ .
Viollu 1

-
e) T'
l'
fJ .-
Violin 2 ;:t>"!>. "
~. I"~' "--""' ~
Ie)
~ .....---.... ~ .~. .....-:-.. ..
~.
Viola.
l' T
. Vlololicall a .. ..,.-..... !7""1. .~. ~ . .,.---.....
Contra.bas ~
s"

.- ..,-
{= ;0 + ~.:~. = :; :; .i ~.~
Trb .
T·'l'rudt1o = 6
==-
'. fI ,.;......... .- .- .- .-. .-' .-.
Vln.t c
e): :p:p
fJ
Vln.2
~ '-./ .~.
, ""'--" ~. '~ . .~. ,.~.

! .~ '.~. .~. .~. .~ . .- .,.-:--..~


Via . fE.;"
:: :pp
VIc
I ,,--.... ,,--.... .~ ,,--...., .-. .-
Cb • ." .
. - ..
'-==== -'
r . . :; ~ .... . ~
@ul,..- :-~,
Trb.
--== =--
,II
i t.I

"
...--..
:- '--'"
~ .-
.~
'--" .......:.,.....

VIa.
- ,t.I

-
' '-.:.,...-.
~
-
~.
~

-
~',

'--'-
""'---'"
~'
~.

/""7""': ~
'~.
~....:::,...t

,"='"
-
.~.

Vic. ~r:.~~
Cb.
~ .~ ....-...... -... -
"'--"'"
182

string choir.
In polyphonic passages, fugal or canonic participants
are always all from"the same instrumental family, and are
often p.ve·n identical instruments'. · This is particularly fre-
quent with violins and trumpets in the second period, and
flutes and trombones in the fourth (Ex. 3).
Before he turned to true coloristic writing, Hovhaness
used percussion instruments no more often than the practice
in standard repertoire 19th century music. Percussion in-
.struments appear in non-coloristic roles only in works where
... __ ._.t.nere_.are.. no other ..instruments .available •

The Piano
Although Hovhaness was employed fora while as a Church
organist, his primary keyboard prowess is as a pianist. He
...usest~s instrument often in all periods, except in his major
orchestral works, where he prefers other keyboard instruments
such as' the celesta.
In his first period, Hovhaness turns to the piano as
...hisnatural habitat, so to speak, using it as the most con-
venient vehicle for neutral sound. Piano scoring first be-
comes truly interesting in the secqnd period. From this point
forward, Hovhaness's handling of the piano has several dis-
tinguishing characteristics:
1. Contrary to what might seem to be its natural
identity, the instrument is used pri~arily

for non-harmonic writing. The sound is linear


183

Ex. 3. Pilate (1963)

14· . Dance of Silent Wtn~

.A .J .... 8~k ~.~ ~


1
I"' P
~~
. ~
In. ~- _.&. ]!-£;:-£
Flute 2 -
.~ p
-...
~ ~ I~ ~ ::!i!:

~ p
.. -
-.
P. 3 L
Bass Drum
.
-. - :I
P. 4· ..a.
Chimes p
I"' P
P.5 .
6iantTamtaln "' p F.
~
184

and textural rather than chordal. When chords


occur they are most often dissonant and are
neutral in terms of progression.
2~ 'The instrument ·is used less like a Western
keyboard instrument and more.. ,like an Oriental
plucked or percussive instrument. Hovhaness
deliberately imitates the rapid figurations
and drone notes of various Armenian, Indian
and.Korean zither-like instruments in rapid
passages, and the sounds of gongs and bells
in slm'ler ones.
3. However, certain modern Westem'pianistic
"tricks" do appear such as exploiting unusual
piano ranges, striking the strings inside the
piano, and setting off harmonics by depressing
notes silently and striking appropriate lower
notes sharply.
Ex.· 4, from the Lake of Van Sonata (1946), illustrates
some of these characteristics. A Simple, modal melody occu-
pies the middle stave. The top stave provides A as a drone.
note. There is a relentless sixteenth-note tactus •.
Hovhaness insures an even intensity by striking the drone
note only when there is no melody note to strike, so there
are never two notes struck at once. The sound resembles
Western xylophone writ~ng, or the effects of Armenian or
Oriental zither-like instruments more than conventional piano
185

Ex. 4
.I
Solennc J =72
I~:-'
.
~j II ·1 J 1 ~rr--r-~ I J . .1 J ! J I:' I
F·-.:;u;.:J ~=,;.;w =..Ll.... ~'-=":;;:<j ~")'-... ,
~
I ~-l:' ~-
I

I nifl I I I r *'r r . J' I I J J


I :

~?-'

pedal ad lib. . .
Sold ~"" C ($1' _. ) ;;~ TJ~~le pc.da!. (Depress silently b:ro:e beginning and do not releaS~..~lddle·PCda! until Allegro,. .'
8bas.sa.""" '. . ... .'. •

""_. c v

_<r_~_

Bva bass a .............................:


... like a so/I gong
. ...... ....
t: -:.: .. " ".~'" ~

-~~
-.................
~
---,-....-,....0'"
...,..
8v~ bassa ......... ....................•.......... :
:..;, .'

., '.:":' '":.; -. ', .. ..


~~

. ..
.
186

music. The lowest stave prov~des the low C (held throughout


with middle pedal). It occurs once every 5 1/2 measures in
a strict cycle. It 1s struck just 'before the beat to avoid
emphasizihg anyone pulse or coorc1inating with the other
parts. The effect, as indicated, should resemble a gong.
In instances like this, pitch is less important than sonority,
but the effect can be varied by the exact choice of notes.
In some works Hovhaness uses a note distant from the harmonic
vocabulary of the other. parts; in others he selects a chro-
matic or diatonic cluster. This particular case is one of,
-- --the least -dissonant.
A 'stylistic variant which produces a similar but slight-
ly more intense effect results from moving the drone note,
either gradually, by changing -the note after sey-eral mea-
sures, or quickly" so that the drone- function is served by
each melody note in turn, as in Ex. 5, also from the Lake of
Van Sonata.
Notable in Ex. 5 is the use of the grace note figures
marked x. These resemble zither-like effects; they are not
different from Western guitar-strumming either. They also
provide a bit of textural richness. In passages where a
ceremonial quality is associated with th~ pianistic technique
under discussion, Hovhaness frequently provides grandeur
through judicious employment of reinforcing grace-notes in
,low register.
Although this technique is frequently used, it would be
187

Ex. 5

J~.~~~~~ I

. .. .., con pedaZe


~~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _~~

: ': . . :':~" ',~" ..:" ,',


'
.~

..J ..J
. . ... .
. ! LL--:.-----
- ..

.- . -' ..
," ,',

.... ..
~

"-" ~ ", ', . ~ .


. ...
••• t. •• • _

------- ~-
.. . . ... ~......

. '7../
....• -,-, _ _ _ _ _ _ _- J \ . -_ ___' ~----'':":_---------"-----~--..:..------=.;
:; .

. :.

_ _ _...JA\-_ _ _ _ _--'A'--_ _ _ _ifA.A_ _ _ ~A'- _ _ .J._____ ..J\_____ ._ __


· . 188

an overstatement to say all of Hovhaness1s second period


piano writing uses these drone-like designs. But it is never-
theless the case that the piano music of the period is nor-
mally rapid, thin in texture and ~ervaded by a more or lA~&

relentless rhythmic tactus. Sometimes this effect is softened,


but it is almost always present. In another section of the
Lake of Van Sonata, a more complex melody appears in the
right hand. The left hand accompaniment has the function of
a drone. It plays only three tones, and sounds at all six-
teenth-not~ pulses when the right hand is silent, and at no
. ___ ..9.the~ .times. .The drone effects are softened by the relati ve-
ly florid melody part, which is active enough so that the
drone notes rarely sound (Ex. 6).
In the second period there are many works for piano alone
or with one chamber-orchestral combination or another. The
pianistic writing is basically similar except in cases where
the orchestra has all the essential musical material and the'
.keyboard has merely textural interpolations. These are gen-
erally cyclic and percuss~ve in nature.
After the second period, the piano is found almost ex-
clusively in solo works. Its function with other instruments
is replaced by the harp, other keyboards, or percussion in-
struments. The solo piano writing of the later music, hm'l-
ever, is quite interesting. Repeated note drones are re-
placed by extreme low-register sustained notes, related to
the gong imitations ·of Ex. 5, but more important texturally.
189

Ex. 6. Lake of Van Sonata

Allegro ).=88, )=)

senza pedaZe

.- ~,

...

.. -
---
......1- ...... , -
'. -. : .'::
..... :.: ~\:.
:."

...
-
.,.~ :: ...
....... ._.... ......
"""- -.~'
. . : ..
: .. -_- .....
,'"
• •. ~ - • .- 'Y

-
,', ":"
190

Held notes in melodic passages 1ead"to additive and subtrac-


tive harmonic effects, and much ~oloristic exploit~tion is
made of the juxtaposition of staccato notes, regular melodic
- notes, and held notes. Tempi are'inuch slower, as-is no:cmal
in this period, but rapid figuration occurs, often creating
a blurring effect, entirely d~fferentfrom the insistence of
the rapid passages in the second period. Most of these tech-
niques can be observed on the first page of the score of the
Bardo Sonata (1960). Note that there are no repeated notes,
by contrast to the second period, where they existed in such.
- --pro~sion (Ex .•. 7.) •
In closing it should be stated that there are a few
works where the· piano is employed to·play rich, chords, in
linp. with more normal keyboard tradition, as in Ex. 8.

---Other Keyboard Instruments and Percussion


Hovhaness frequently employs the percussion to give
brief coloristic interpolations in orchestral pieces. The
extent, range and variety of instruments increase in succeed-
---ing -periods. In the first period, normal II Romanti c" percus-
sion prevail, with emphasis on timpani and with some use of
cymbals and bass drum. In the second period timpani still
predominate, but gongs are added, along with some use of the
vibraphone. More important, it is in the second period that
the 'usage becomes typically coloristic.
The percussion parts are almost always cyclic and, ex-
cept where driving rhythmic empha.sis is des'ired, they consist
191

Ex. 7. Bardo Sonata

..", +_..

mf~--~----4---~'~

. -
_•• "'0

; ~! i;~'\4~-"~7.!a~?~~~
~~~v~u-~~~4---~--~~ A~
..:;. .;; -0- ~og. ~"uV-";-·-O-"iTy.1i-O-v<;- ""71'
f

Jrj .' ..; ..


Ped••..••...•....•.....•• _ •.;••.......•...••~.~.:,•••_~....... _••.•_.•.••._._.~~ ••.••.•.•••.•.•••.•••...•••••:.......•...•._....•.•__ ~._ .•.•. ~•.••:•• .;,_._•
. . ~ "-:: .'
..

·· ~ •.• ....;" ....__


~.r.;

-~
~
~--"",:-:""
-r- ......
~.

9T~~=d~~~=d~~~~~1J:;if .~~ ~~
...

· .-
, ~:.:-
192

Ex. 8. Suite For Piano (1967)


----
, -. -,.- ----.

. . . .
, . Andante mistcrioso J. 88 ... , ..'. " .•

'f!. ~.' -~
8114-······-······-b···~····..:..·..:..-··--···:-..·..··-..·::.:...-...-;:... -.:..-
,t ~
. L I ~IJ ......"
...~...---...- ..- ...:.~.~..- ..- -
, I ,
···
f:) .

.'. .·r~
I ~r ~.

It. I I Ii· "I IS'" ·


~

i
pp mislerioso
, ·
··
.~ , "
~ ... ~, ~it .__..... _......_____
811'.,50 ........._......_ ........._............. ~
...___...._.. _ _
'. *~ *'iw.
. ~~ .. . .... ; ...

v:

. .
864550_. _____ ... ,~ ..... _._..... _.~ ..........~...~._.. _._ .. ~:_:...: .............. _ ................. ~ ....: __..... _ .........._._,; ......... _ _ •.
*'iw. . . .....
. .~. '.'"
. :' _." .
8"4_....-.-~-.....- ...---·-.-.-....:...:...-..~-.-..-.......-....:.........;.....--:.---...-.-.-......-...--.....- ..-.-.-.
'_.... ,:.-1\ " n. . --#. ,!1a~ ." . I . ·,iJ II ,
.
: .~~ .
.:. "-f4J-

~ v .' I
."I ,. " 'ttl ".1 .. '1 "" •
,
'.
.. :,:',
~

t1~ : . ", '.' ~~ ~ ",' '.


81111150 __....__._......_ ............ _ ...... _ . _ ..... __ •__: ..._...._ ....._ . __.... _ ........... _ ... __ •.:..-... _ .... _ .....__
. .. *~
...
.
~ .... 4
. *'1U . *'1U
..-.... '

. 8 1"1-..-.--....- ...... -'-.. - ...... ,-......- -••-.-..- - - -..- -.... - ......- - - : - -.._ ..... __....._ .......... _ ...._ .. _ ............ _._ ....

. .. ~-
·b'r4. .k~~
. '
1\ I f I I L n I>'f>

t !h-i: .4i'....--::...::-..
., ··
·
v_
cJ 41- 'tv .' I
~

· ··
, I i " ,- ..
I ·· · ···
,.

. .~

· ~-6l-

..
~.~: '.-~ .~>~~:s.~-. -.-:. .~~~,.~:.~:. .~~.,:.~. ~=. .~_~. . . ~:. . -.:~-~.~ . . ~-:-~~~i..~--. ~-:--:.7'7-.,,-.-.:~:.:. .:~~,--::-
.", ',,;!",
" '..:. ... ; ....... .
193

of many more rests than notes. Despite the simplicity of


this practice, one cannot doubt its effectiveness •. The high';'
ly specialized sound of percussion instruments is probably
better sUited to this type of usag~ than that of .other in-
struments, where the part may appear to blend with others
rather than to have a clearly individual and coloristic pur-
pose.
The canonic passages in the St. Vartan Symphony are
typical instances where percussion are used in cycles in
this ~Tay. The second movement is a canon for three trumpets.
--~he cymba1s,-small and large gongs. play in prime number
cycles of the type we have come to expect (EX. 9). (A simi-
lar passage is 'quoted in Chapter VI, 'Ex. 21.)
Perhaps more interesting are passages involving tuned
instruments, most notably the vibraphone or .celesta.
Hovhaness begins to use these instruments late in his second
period and throughout his fourth period. These are often
assigned longer groupings of notes. The tuning would tend
to confuse the non-harmonic identity of these parts, so
Hovhaness writes them so they relate only chromatically to
other parts. The effect of these passages can be extremely
moving. In consonant, slow sections, they seem to suddenly
expand the coloristic dimensions of the music while adding
dissonance which is perceived more as "foreign" than as un-
pleasant. Ex. 10 is for celesta.

In the fourth period there are few actual changes in


194

Ex. 9. St. Vartan Symphony (1950 )

~
. ,
&L'~ - -.
Jt
"'" ~

......===:= -
:..='
s~

I~Tpts. 2' ~r,


tJ
,.
-
tJ ' - . . .

-.-_-
....."._4_V
..... ... _- ~
'"", ~

~~
1l ::::-"
3
tJ,f -~ -
"rm.
f'!
I:(!t

~
Gong
~

'l'am-t a.m

.
11 ~. -'U!. ,.~ .,-- "~Jl~
I~ ~

-
4:>

- - -'"-
RoTpts..2<
CI
.A
-

. -~ - . ......,
.
.
-
~ .==-""t
81
~
- .
-.....;;;;;;
" ,
ff
"1m... ~
.....".....",

tJ

II
1\

,«.I J
,-

..,.... -
~-
-- ;::-.... 1':1

f'!~ ~ !::--I':I
B~Tpts. 2< ~

,..--...,
tJ "'-.:' "'C>lI+~ --=
at ... ." ~r..

C:ym
"

..
tJ
f'!

~
---_- ....... .--=
--- --=== .

GOng
CI.
-
·.'IUll-t am
..
195··

Ex. 10 •. Mysterious Mountain (1955)

:!.'-.'1lI I
b4a.S" - .,
f~G~6
.A I
!!I
n..
.
1;1
~

t-..
- -"r
percussion usage except in the rhythnuess passages. For ex-
ample in Ukiyo-Floatingloforld (1964), there is an extended
march-like passage in which the percussion have similar
cyclic roles to the passages in the second period. For ex-
ample, the xylophone plays one pulse every 19 beats in 4 time.
One technj.que, however, that .bec:omes prevalent in the
late music, is the ~se of timpani glissandi. This is only
a special case of the composer's general interest in sliding
. --sounds for all instruments ·capable of them.
In soloistic passages, non-tu.11.ed instruments receive
essentially the same, predominantly cyclic, treatment. How-
ever, since more notes are needed in each of the parts in
order to create enough music to sustain the texture, different
instruments are selected. Usually e~ch such passage uses
two or three kinds of drums, where the orchestral passages
might have fewer. (See Chapter VI, Ex. 28.)
Xylophone and vibraphone, however, receive some truly
melodic treatment, but here the writing very closely resem-
bles Hovhaness's treatment of the piano. .Rapid writing is
preferred, with quick !!tactus," .and the rhythm is usually
196

direct and' constant" with many. repeated not.es and few chords.
The technique, in fact, is ~ven more natural to the xylophone
or th~ marimba than the piano, and if any ,borrowing l'ras in-
volved in' the thought process, the keyboards may not have
been the original seat of the idea.

string Instruments
Although they are used 'in very personal ways" the strings
are as much the heart of the orchestra for Hovhaness as they
are for more traditional composers. They were the first and
most frequently' selected instrument's to receive free-rhythm
treatment. They are' very often seiected. fO'r modal fugues'.
They are frequently used for chordal backgrounds in all
periods" and their ability for glissandi allows them to suf-
fer no limitations in the late music.
. . . Even the double-basses
. "'are' used for all these purposes as well as certain other p,ur-
·poses of their own.
,
Hovhaness almost always scores chords for string choir
in closed position. Moreover" multiple divisi and multiple-
stopping are often used so that many different notes are pre-
sent. Although Hovhaness scores chords widely, in order to
achieve spaciousness of sound, he also is definitely inter-
ested in richness. The extreme open scoring at the opening
of Ives I s UnanSi'lered Question would be replaced by Hovhaness
an effect just as wide, and similar in its bredth of color"
~ut very different. We find these close packed chords even
in the earliest orchestral works. In the first symphony
197

Ex. 11. Ives-Unanswered Question

--+..
./

It
....... -
......, . l'\

, -
..L
A

Ex. 12

~
#.

(1937), each stave of strings plays closed position triads


divisi a 3 (Ex. 13).
Later, Hovhaness-would avoid the nervous effect of the
concurrence of rhythmic agitation with the dissonant combina-
tions of rapidly moving triads. In the fourth period, for
example, chords just as rich, or richer, 'occur, but in long
held notes. These are equally striking, due to the natural
ability of the string orchestra to hold chords indefinitely
without loss of intonation or intensity.
Such combinations may be consonant or dissonant, and
both types are illustrated in Chapter IV. vIe find such
198

Ex. 13
- .
,7
"
.
... ..... ..
.' -
~

W9==--4:_"lS._
~!;
.~~~ . ,,

. -
~"r" .....
- o. -0

----"'"
11·

Ttl(.
~"",7.
_"#" ""'-

liao.t .
I 0
.
Sot:
Iv. , "rg .:40... ~3 ..

- tijt1iiJ£l~!!J-~itID.~'1=Ftf-~s~jJt*"~illmtu-tb
~ "R ~~nlil1-i~t:2Y!O bt!!-t~~lt~~.;f!~t~u~~F-
"::::;.w. .
RP-
J .:tA\I. ~ 3 5:-ili ~
-t-~

.
,
- tM"aJ
~~"'j-n~~~
1?
_ .~~~~~~~
~iv. "- 3 -~1-~
VIZ. - Dr",
=tlj~~~
£P
..

+"=4"0-

14

·rWtr--,-- ., __...
---_.
199

chords both as independent textures and as accompaniments to


melodic and polyphoniC episodes. It is rare" however, for
some string parts' to participate in linea~ writing while
others play sustained chords. \-
Polyphonic use of strings is very frequent. Instances
can be pizzicato orarco" and harmonic or non-harmonic. The
,pizzicato versions tend to be non-harmOnic" and often serve
as a background to other music. In the first movement of
the St. Vartan Symphony, strings have a canon~ pizzicato,
based on a melodic line stated in the foreground of the te~-

'- ,~ure by solo trombone. The canon is' polymoda1· (Ex. 15).
The use of arco strings is very frequent in modal fugal
sections. In the Missa Brevis (See. Chapter V) strings double I

the chorus in polyphony. Even in very late works for orches-


tra" strings are the most usual medium for harmonic counter-
point~

This instrumentation is 'not at ali original; nevertheless


it is very effective because it takes full advantage of the
melodic and sustaining powers of the strings. Strings are
also used for coloristic interpolations, although this is
somewhat more the province of other instruments. Often per-
cussive effects are imitated. Ex. 16 is an instance of a
IIdragon-f1y,1I as Hovhaness calls it, an interpolation not
different in'effect from a stroke on a small gong. Exo 17
is a double-bass part from Ukiyo-Floating World (1964).
Basses often represent an orchestral group by themselves.
200

Ex. 15
# '.

~ I l l ;--... ..-.- l ~
'l'rb.

,.t.,
'limp . .
--""'

..
~

.
'l'am-tam

.1\ .
VIn.!
e.o
1'1
.
Vln.2

.......
ttl

1'lzl. Jo .. e •• .~ I~ ..
. VI&. T

VIa.
-r- -r~r-------r""---"'r~r- - r""'---""'"
Cb.
,
201

Ex. 16. Symphony No."" 6 (1959)

Ex.

" --providing" piz~:i,c~toeffects"suggestive of timpani (when re-


stricted to one note) or untuned drums (when comprising tight-
ly packed chords, as in Ex. 17).

1'1inds
"----Hovhanessuses all the" wind instruments i'or II arias';--
"for solo vocal melody. Often the accompaniment is provided
by chordal strings possibly with coloristic effects of basses
or percussion. There are uses of winds for polyphony, but
-this is comm~n"only in chamber works for winds only or late
orchestral works. In both of these cases the lines written
differ little from those used for strings; moreover, there
is little difference in the types of lines applied to the
different ~~nd instruments. As explained earlier in this
chapter, the melodies l'lould be found idiomatic on virtually
all instruments. Often the same theme migrates throughout
the mem1:>ers of the "rind families.
202

Winds are used less frequently for chordal, accompaniment


,than strings~ perhaps due to their relative lack of homogene-
ity as a choir. They are used less often for coloristic in-
terruptions than any of the other "instruments, perhaps be-
cause their nature is so basically different from percussion
instruments. However there are some examples where woodwinds
provide interrupting material 1n chordal form:

Ex. 18. ~s10n from High Rock (1959)


~ ..
'_ .~,;,,.t-
., r-~ .e-.!-
,...
-,., .- 'I:~~ ~~
". -I" .
~
,...._. -_... \N'"'ct.f \j
. ...
,"Ii , (

-e§,
~ .

.,,
oM._
• . l '"
II 1:1
D
Jl' IA ,~
~1. ~
,..
Iff' I!( D" , ....
.... I
~
A
A
I~
l~
It ~

...
t!
f" L
'W '" 'r- V'
~
t12.
~~ tl
(;

.
c. ' ... c:w.
~ :"

~W.,~_ ~ G ~
I'"' \; .p' w'
IQ

.,. '>.p' -I- .. ".... ,+",


-,
." 1
.
-r-
... ,..
Lo. II!!'
iA.
iii" ..
"

I
-,
' I
, "
IJ "oJ
.0.1,~
L.. ~ .....
I.,.
..... g.

Possibly because he has been able to obtain performances


-of high quality~ Hovhaness has written many works~ including
several symphonies~ for wind orchestra or band. In these
works little is found by way of orchestral idiom that is not
found in. the orchestral works~except for greater concentra-
tion of wind usage. For example~ in the fourth Symphony
(195 8) melodic solos can even be found for bass-clarinet and
contra-bassoon.
203 .

Ex. 19

C.~·GufCO" .

I!h\~gr J IJ riM! &I&@ IF IPI6


lIovhaness has preferences among the winds. In particu-
lar he prefers brass to Wood,\,linds. Wi thin the woodwinds he
favors the f1ute~ especially in the. fourth period. (One
Symphony--the l7th--is for Umetal" orchestra~ including only
6 flutes~ 3 trombones~ and bells.) Among the brass~ horn~

trumpet and trombone co-exist equally through the first three


periods. However~ in the fourth~ Hovhaness assigns a special
importance to the trombone because of its ability to handle
glissandi. Where other wind instruments are restricted to
.uncomfortable glissandi of no wider an interval than a sec-
ond~ ~he trombone has a maximum glissando of half an octave
and~ more important~ can handle the glissando as a very
natural part of its idiom in any tempo and dynamic level.
In ... ome \'lOrks we find closely juxtaposed upward and downward
or crossing glissandi for trombones, creating a. stra.nge effect
of sliding in more than one direction at once:

. Ex. 29. ~ymphony No.4


204

Ex. 21. Ukiyo-Floating World

Voices
The voice is in many ways Hovhanes$'s most natural idiom.
His music is so appropriate to vocal treatment, that it is
very, hard to find anY'i?hing original, daring, or surprising
in his choral writing. There are few. advances to
. be found
.. -
beyond the choral techniques of the Medi,eval and Renassiance
eras, until the fourth period when Oriental techniques are
. imitated. Here the voice uses glissandi, 'parlando and other
non-harmonic procedures. In the op~ras, this allows the
_. --words to take precedence over. the notes, creating a style of
music-drama akin to ancient myste~y plays or·Eastern cere-
monial forms. In the ensuing example from The Leper King
(1965), the first two lines use a restricted mode, with glis-
andi betl'leen the upper Db and its lower neighbor c. The re-
mainder is a declamatory glissando-parlando that is very far
removed from Hovhaness's usual style in its use of indeter-
minate pitches (Ex. 22).
The climax of this opera is a 'canon a 8 (the only music
~or chorus in the whole work not written entirely in unison)
on the words UStab Leper King." NarrOl'l rang~. glissandi and
close stretti lead to a thick sound, rich in chromatic
205·'

Ex. 22

Solo
...A
t
l"ll StQf%f!
-
J4' - -comes
--
"i'n~,
If·
~:o-..

,,,
Choe
""S . .
-
.A t:\
Solo ~8

Chota.
1.1
....8
-
s~ne----· ..
.
-
at-- -- S~
I'!'\

. ~". '. .. ... ...':.:. ~::" ::


. ..", _." . .... ' ...... '
,

. . . ... ..
- :.... ',.,' .....
r."\

toI~
Solo
II
. ~ """,,1- Jt:\

IJ.
.
Cupsed---- ~ "{~
• ~. R .... •• ,

. - ..
-.- .... ':.:,:",--~~ -;'.'!';.,;;-...•. . -:::' :-.:':;. : .
.. ..'. . .
~

. :. :;.. f:\ .. -. ...


',.!... . •" .::

'

......... .
...
. -- .... . ' ..
",

.0 .. ".... ..

. "

ChO~!~~~I- -
.' .. CUP.s-~t! - - - - - - .Je . stone ant! lun,p - -
.. - ....... .. .:
.-............. .' ~

.:. ~ -. -:..:... : : ,".::: ~:. :,": ': ::: -,: .-"' ..•..:":.. .:.....:'.. :-..:'. :~... '~.. -.:..,:.: ~ ... ;:. I .....

.." ~ ... - . ' .


• . . , .. ! ....... ;.' .... ' ....... ;. ~ - ''"; .... ,,"':"!"'. ~ ',' ~ '," ,- .~. _.' ... '.'

. .

~~~~. _O~_
~.. ... ~. ee-=::---~~'"
_--===t=- -- -. '---1--':1--:--------!II
:":.'':_::.;. ...

-.~_;: :~-__ ,': a~ -


206

disso.nance, caused by the peculiar cho:1.ces of notes and in-


tervals. Even microtonal dissona~ occur as a result of
differences in the individual executions of glissandi. The
suggesti'oi'l that Hovhaness is nct subtle in these momento L'l1:£y :"
be allayed by noting the care of the relation of glissandi to
textual me1isma. In those bars where the words fiLe-per Kingfl
are set, the composer employs glissandi only on the melisma
of the syllable "Le. 1I Glissandi are avoided where a change
of note accompanies a change of.syllable (Ex. 23).

Combinations
Except in chamber cominations of a IIbroken consort"
character, Hovhaness usually keeps the various orchestral
choirs quite distinct from one another. He prefers doubling
a part by a member of the same group, adding intensity with-
_.- _·-out·creating a complex blend of colors. Doubling a part by
a.member of another choir is rather rare. When this does
~ccur, it almost alw'ays involves doubling a string melody
by a wind instrument at certain pOints but not for the dura-
- ·ti·on of the .entire melody, thus emphasizing important phrases
(Ex. 24).
This mode of scoring most often creates an effect quite
different from standard Classical-Romantic orchestration
where blending of sonorities is cultivated. In fact, Hovhaness
usually avoids doubling altogether. The ensuing excerpt,
from a rather uninspired moment of Symphony' No. 1 (1937),
shows a passage where strings (diatonic)' anS'\'ler woodwinds
207

Ex. 23,

.it ..--
.
......... ..
~

1
I • ':'-./ I

lA"\j' I

Fl. 2
I• '<--..-x.:.. V' '<.~' l...Ji1 -"'_,.,lI(
lt1
s
r:LY' -1iI._~' J"
""-~'
J,I'

-
III
Solo \

146

, ,

Jr C-peSc,
I ..--
r....--
18 '. ' '/0."ttjJ.
sW .u-pep .~aJ, I.e~ IGrtp, .ka.o/-
-
~ ,PeJco 4'& ~C4 CPt98C,
. -=
r~8 ~ ... ...... ;;;;;0 -r
..le - P~I" Kin;. sta./; L.e -'pet>Ill'!!. "'.:..sttZ!J .l.e#.t- ff,~~-
1ft
. ~CP 4 P ~ er'>£$'c,
~
"
PaT",,! "-:>"
,.
sr.:iP-- Ie .. ~ ~'nJI.
-,r
--
.staO u-#?(i'frP, ;tab
1ft pOCP 4- ~ ~# C~
I
"-
........'
i18'~'" ' ~~-l' fI~-

Le - pet" &'71;?- sid, b-,~fft~. 3talJ U - Pet- ffI'nJ".


I" p. ~U'CP
"'" pot:
" ~e.sc"

1·8·~"~
,,,-.....£ 'II ~..-J>'
I'~
b - #ta lfi'n,,?,
'" staZ) . ~ - p~"ffi'nJI. st(1/J
,st-a.IJ
Iii b ,PdCO 4 P#C4

lie ~'.""'e-. ~ ~ 1.,->


'''''''-l! ,. ,

'Le - pep f(i:':!, sttib-- .l:t!,- pep /Un~.


~e-4.h-
111 t;> , .P~

ITs ~ ,. ~..>
'1E"-"~'!' '~
'"
S~ab Ie - .P~ lLn;. scaD
~ n

8 ~~.~. ,.-...> • 1.1


.
Ex. 24. Symphony No." 6 (1959)

:=:-.....

a\' J=loB ,'"


I . ... *.:.:'":: .:::~~...
.J
08.
1
CL.

~N.I
J

.y \".

VA.
!P.
VC.
n r::::P

CL.

SSt! .

. -~fl.1

~"l 3
4-
.'1A. 3
t
Ve. 3
Ca. .4
AF.CO Mf J -=::; ~
209

(chromatic). Note that there.is absolutely no doubling, and


that the lines are given, in turn, to each member of the
choir equally (Ex. 25).
There are very few passages as thinly scored as Ex. 25.
On the other hand Hovhaness rarely uses extended tutti pas-
sages, except where some of the parts are rhythmless. When
rich chordal endings occur (as in Kysterious Mountain, Chap-
ter IV, Exs. 28-30) the full orchestra is employed only for
the last cadences. The.St. Vartan Symphony is typical. The
~wo major groups--trumpets and strings, never play together
until the last movement. The entire ensemble (also including
other brass and piano) never plays all at once. It is no
accident that some orchestral works- in the early 50's are
designated Itconcerto for orchestra,," Even in the fourth
. period, "There very large orchestras are used and big effects
striven for, full tutti are rare. Fr~ Angelico, for example,
a major work to be discussed closely in Chapter XII, contains
the standard orchestral complement with additional bell-like
percussion. There are several perorations, some conventional
and some in free-rhythm, calling for multiple divisi and ex-
treme loudness, but never are all the orchestral forces com-
_. bined. Either woodwinds or percussion a!e missing from
every climax.
210

Ex. 25. Symphony No.1 {1937}

.Lt-
-
Fl. I"~
i~
1 I~

> ..
IJ
;;t,
~

CP. . i'
~II

1 J..
If
7'
e-'

"-.:..- .
,.. Ir'~,. ? I?
C/.
: ..1 '1.. J
Ji
-
'tI'
~

.~
~~!f
~'" .,
i
-
1
~.

'. o;r
.,
J'~" 1"
~I

F
I - t ., \
I"

f; II 11
• -
.
211

Ex. 25 (Continued)

- ~ t ... ,J. .A

.~ .".r:i.. ::--•
~ ~

"

.\"
~
..
.!}

.'r-
',6>
- --- -""Try
. --

TI'II
'" :!
'

i' .
['....cD! 7'
£-;;--., . .
! ==~~~ ~ . ~

\11. I J MCD
.a. ~
.. .A.~• .
IJ .,.
MC4
~ ~~
~I

-
IJ I
Z' ~lD ..-.-
f'l It ()I/('C/I
::P ,. . .

l "

~
J!!
LartD

.~"
C.

cb• ."
212

CHAPTER VIII"

SCORING II (FREE-RHYTHM PASSAGES)"

Hovhaness began to use free-rhythm techniques just after'


the major personal and artistic crises of 194-3.' The idea is
easily explained and more or 1ess easily imitated, but it is
a device with which Hovhaness seems to associate the greatest
si~1i:fic&.nce, both ..11 thin pieces and as a spiritual beacon
in his career. He has written about the technique in notes,
in prefixes and in margins of scores. It appears to be the
one achieveme'rit of which he is most proud.
The simplest form of free~rhyt~ wri~ing is a convention-
al trill. The notes, are precisely determined, 'as is their
sequence (simple in the case of a trill} and the performer
, ,

~imply repeats the notes rapidly, continuing the pattern for


the duration notated. Hovhaness's free-r~thm patterns dif-
fer in that the speed, although rapid, is not quite trill
speed, so that individual notes may stand out somewhat more.
Also,-~f'cours~, Hovhanessuses patterns of considerably
greater length.
One of the most complete marginal descriptions of the
tec~~que occurs in Hovhaness's preface to Shepherd of Israel
(1951). Even in what is a relatively sober account,
Hovhaness refers to repeating phrases nan infinite number of
times," an obviously impossible quasi-myst~cal suggestion:
213

The "pizzicato ostinato tremolando" effect on


pp. 5-8 of the opening Pastoral movement is very
simple and easy in performance once it is correct-
ly understood in its free execution and sound. It
should be played with the soft fleshy part of the
f1ngers~ softly' but rapidly and in free rhythm.
If ~he string parts are played by two or more play-
ers each, each player must perform his part at a
slightly, different speed--some faster, some slower,
but never in perfect unison: never stiff, but al-
'ways free, relaxed, fast, repeating the little
phrase over and over again without stops or gaps,
an infinite number of times until the conductor
gives the "stop" signal. Then, each player will
stop instantly without finishing· the phrase he
started. The sound resulting is a continuous mys-
terious murmur like a cloud of undefined sounds,
·wherein single notes do not stand out, and the in-
definiteness of the accidental clashes of the notes
played in free rhythm gives a background of soft
unmeasured, rhythmless, accent~ess, whispering--'
it is up ~o the conductor to indica~e the begin-
ning and ending of the murmuring pizZicato ostina-
to tremolando sections. .
The development of Hovhaness's usage of free-rhythm
music may be described as follows: ,In the second period free-
rr~tr~ music is confined largely to ~trings and occurs either
tor accompaniment or as brief punc~uation between sections.
In the third period the technique is still sometimes used
for accompaniment, but the frequency, length, orchestral
varfety and complexity gradually increase until the fourth
period. At its maximum sway in the late 60's the technique
is extended to all instrumental forces. Some works are so
thoroughly pervaded by the technique that conventional music
serves· only as punctuation between rhythrnless passages. In
orchestral works, simultaneous free-l'hythm parts often number
20 or more. The emotional range extends beyond the original
intention of conveying IIcontinuous mysterious murmur like a
214

cloud~nto expressions of chaos~ power~ fear~ confusion a~~

splendor.

Free-Rhyt~ Music in the Second Period


The first piece to use the rhythmless technique is
Lcusadzak (l944)~ a. concerto for piano and strings. The
piece is also progressive in the sense that it is largely
non-harmonic. It is an early work of the second period~

possibly the most direct product of· the new interests of


that period. At any rate the rhythmless examples are not
very frequent. Moreover~ they·do not really develop beyond
. .
Lousadzak until the border w·orks between the second and third
periods. It is not until just after.1950~ to the best knowl-
edge of this author, that unaccompanied rhythmless passages
occur.
"A . simple instance occurs in Zartik Parkim (1949). Rhythm-
less music is hinted at often by various rumbling figures~

but occurs only once~ as the accompaniment to the piano solo


cadenza near the end of +.he work. At in Lousadzak the same
pattern of mus~c is given to ,two orchestral parts~ namely·
violas and cellos. Of course, 1;. he p,layers each play at indi-
vidual speeds. Later, however, the composer would probably
have assigned a different pattern to each line. The pattern
is quoted on the following page •
. The eighth-note groupings are 4, 12~ 8 and 4. Later,
Hovhaness \,lould choose an odd .prime number for one of the
phrases, to avoid an obviol'c; periodic effect.,' This is in
215

Ex. 1

line with his choice of prime ,numbers .in cyclic passages.


In this case, the alteration might easily occur in the last
phrase--the 4 repeated B's, being replaced by 5. Frequently
rhythrnless patterns end with a series of repeated notes.
With all players going at different speeds, there will gen-
--erally be one.9r. more parts dwelling-on the -repeated note.
This produces a drone effect, and the note chosen for these
repetitions is generally the fifth, and occasionally the
first degree of the mode. Ex. I has a generally scalic char-
acter, and'is clearly in the Dorian mode on E. The second
of the four phrases is more extended and uses the only skip-
wise motion. The whole fabric creates a simultaneous blur
'of all the notes of E Dorian, with emphasis on B.
With its scalic contour, general arch shape, and more
interesting ini'ddle phrase, the design is a reasonably attrac-
tive melody. The notes are not jus~ thro~m together to make
a strumming effect, but melodic considerations and relative
emphases of mode degrees are carefully planned.
In the sixth movement of the St. Vartan Symphony (1950),
we see a slightly more sophisticated example. The movement
is a fUgue with polytonal effects '(see Chapter V, Ex. 14)
216

and the double basses have r~thm1ess accompaniment. Double


basses are often used for this due to the strong resonance
of their pizzicato. Moreover they are not as well suited to
rapid ~oiyphony or neo-moda1 counterpoint, and have no oth~~

characteristic usage desirable to Hovhaness. In the example,


again we observe mostly scalar and repeated-note patterns.
The example opens with E, and has repeated notes on A and D.
Both inflections of F appear, so the murmuring is modally
poised on two or three centers,_ which exactly suits the po1y-
modal counterpoint. The phrase 1engths--14, 7, 9, 7--are
---~omplex. --The third and fourth phrases clearly anSl'ler the
first two however, a-ffirming the pattern of scale followed
by drone note.
This example, as the previous one, utilizes only one
note value. This makes for a more ipdistinct pattern and
the implication is that although each player plays at his
own speed, the notes are of equal value within each part.

Ex. 2

Hovhaness introduces the rhythmless pattern not at the


outset of the music but midway through the movement so that
the combined texture- of counterpoint with rhythmless
\
217

accompaniment accumulates gradually.,


By ~ar the predominant choi~e ~or rhythrr~ess music in
this period is pizzicato string scoring. One interesting
exceptioa'takes place in Anahid (1945) which contains a re-
peated pattern ~or solo violin, arco. A ~lute is present in
conventional 'notation. It is most unusual ~or ~ovhaness to
use only one ~ree-rhythm instrument; there is no con~lict or
overlapping of rhytbmless parts because only the soloist is
employed. It seems to be an entirely unusual case, and is
, clearly rhythmic" falling into {6 ~eter quite naturally.
The only reason 'ror indicating a f~ee~rhythm part for it is
to insure that it does not coincide in any precise way with
the flute it accompanies.

,-
Free-Rhythm Music in the Third Period
Possibly the first instance of unaccompanied rhythmless
music occurs in the Concerto No.2, which is for violin and
string orchestra. Strings are employed areo; Hovhaness fa-
vored this scoring ~or,unaccompanied rhythmless music for
a f~w years while continuing his preference for pizzicato
218

strlngsln accompanYing passages. In Concerto No.2 and


',-other works of the early 50's, on~ dynamic de~lgn appears to'
the exclusion of any other. Typically the composer indicated
~at the out'set with a slow but C!onsiderable crescendo to f! -
or louder, then followed by a complimentary decrescendo back
t~~. The stops, starts, and dynamics are all to be indi';'
cated by the conductor.
The ensuing excerpts employ strings and the pp--ff--pp
dynamic design.
As the third period proceeds the rhythmless palette
----widens. RhytI:un1~ss music remains in use for accoml?animent,
but unaccompanied passages sometimes follow directly upon
one another. The technique ceases to be used merely as punc-
tuation betl'1een conventional sections. Moreover , although
strings and the original dynamic design are still favored,
other instruments and dynamic schemes occur.'
In the Magnificat (1957) many sections use rhythmless
--.- accompaniment, ','lith the -double bass, harp or other strings
being used much in the manner of the second period. In the

Ex. 4. Janabar (~950)

s
219

Ex. 5. Concerto No.2 (1951)

AS PO$Smt BuT Nq'f' ToET£THE/I. - _ C~ cS c _


REf EAT All LIB_

\(.)~~~~~~~~
BuT N'T" -TOt;"THfR. -
AT 1..1
aCR.E
..
Sc."· "
220

"sicut locutus est" section, about one 1'ul~ minute of music


-is devoted to three consecutive free-rhythm passages. The
first and third are for strings, but the second is for chorus.
All three use the standard pp--ff--pp design, and al~ use
narrow me~odic patterns revolving around the modal center of
D. The effect of the chora~ section is rather striking,
reII'iniscent of Hebraic chanting where eac~ member of the con-
- I

gregation hectically sings a simple melodic pattern of re-


citation-tone -character, at his own speed.
It is pertinent tha,t the two string passages are not
-----allke;--de-spite their- symmetrical pqsitions in-what amounts
to a small ternary design. Not only are the upper parts
omitted the second time, but melodic patterns are even nar-
rower, straying even less far from the tonic D (EX. 6).
In Symphony No.6 a passage appears where there are ten
-string parts all of low and narrow tessitura containing some
chromatic contradictions. The effect is that of a tight
blur with some parts (such as the top two) pervaded. by
"growing" figures where the note groups are successively a
bit longer and wider (Ex. 1).

Free-Rhythm Music in the Fourth Period


In the fourth period the free-rr~hm technique is ex-
panded to its apparent limits. In some works, the free-
rhythm music ~ the piece, with other material having less
~mportance and occupying less time. In other works free-
" .;.- . . .".
. 44-. No. 11.
. J :: 80
SICVT LDcuTiJS EST
(rwf...:J..:..:"'::."..:,A;.."_'_C.;,;.I{O._II_
UI;..:.)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ~
lI.!J SEH%A
AA'
,·,.SIIIIA- RAPu Bur NIIT TDGETIIER
45.
REf£AT /l"" lIefEIor A, 1.16. CIIESC.A",' PIIl4. PIIIIATI'"
. 08010 1 ~*
~ &##d- ?- S. J (~i~-==I§JE~~~~~~ft~='-·~-:-·~~~~[1 J.S·
r-I
,, l . P
HOl"! P~.4.--.·;:~·.,~b.
I "§I::-
.. __ • 'i{_~r'-"~~..:... ~~~_,!.s~...!'. _~1i':~.~_ H~'~"!':" -:-- =}If == _=.f! '.
(\J
F T-":-,~~i-'"
S·i. ,.~~~~=P~l1'l=JL..P..:..JI..~.JLtff.t.p .. ) ~.
(\J
.-
'~_§1~.~~-'r~.1.PT A' 'A-TIlII ;;;";~"!!~'" . .--.
8AU Stt.~.:1,fd -. .... .,;.. 1 . f~.:~c]l=iJt-;'A-:i ~ fr~~:Jrri:PYJITF=t:;:fr:-2~~
:=. tn-=;:
C~,,;~~: _--' i>
:I~ _S'.~yT~L.:C",~~s~._£Sr:~A.'A,,~.. s-_~:mtJ:~'"""'..
~-jl-lLjI-l-JLJl-£L-JL.JL.~-=.~-7'~.~-.-""
IJr~_SIc::...~T LG·,,,·Tuf Esr /I' , .. ,THI N.-· srA'S:.
)·,~i:1EJl~Ji~Jt~~~;;~E-j.FAr]E.;~~$¥JD~~·t~S'~
T~t~~jG!~~:·YIT~·Jfi];;-{fj~j.':.fu ~~~~~j~~£f
~:7!

"
-:(~~- -,;' -~
I
---';=--=.-=-... -.. G)."£:-~ 1.c...:...U~~~~!.~••._~!~ ~ ~~A :"!~'.L. ",~ - I "OJ.t,; ~
;I'~'.R'-~~'''.''; ",-,':R:;~-:'~':='" &':@ . ""'~;;JI=~
~.r"~~:ct~~I"(S;~!.}"-~~..; ~o.~~~;;-;" ,r~!'I!.~lL
.. .

",1I"
. n:t ~
t'I.

A
.•
- P~$=f=.It-=.I\=~".,.=-t~~ - ~
. - --t;)"---1::'-
. ---:::
-U=[7--t1---~-t1"-
=-=..'
S,t.-ur L.·c.u ... r_r C'Jr A.
--
fA. TAli lVo.- 5',.,,5: ---
V.DU;'2.<W=:-~'§§§~§~~~§§§§~~§~§~I ~. - .

:_A
I~·~~~~~~~~~~~~~§ts~~~~
. ~&~ 8E'~.t£ ~
-
VIOLA
• r;"'-""} PURATION
-J.) . C.El"'(~~~~~~~~~~~~§~§j~~~~ BA\\ -AI=I;o@##! r."l
tIS ~~ .~
,.,...
()
8AS1~~ .- S I( (TA'fi~ .-:'"'I
'fH
~~~~,:~~ 52 '- T:/1CE.fj
~
r.\

AI
~TJJ~ll' ---.~=c3
-' .. - --.-. - :-~'_-=-_:.-:.;::.J)U-RAT.l.~ROUN~£(..,1I

- .f
(f)
~
~
SEHltA MlsuRA r."). . .

1=~!;"~5:~"-'---
:::'::':'. "':."::::. -=';f:;~;::~
-:.!'- -=:.:-.~~=,,=:--:.... ':.~ .. '. "'"'2.~ ..,-,." .-~ ;:)Al~ - r.\ _ _ _ _ .

• @ ..- = If'
'-=..-:.'. ---.-:-=: , -.-
A
- -....
·C:-.

._--
IIC
o TI
SEHZA ,.'hSuU
¥~:7J11Hl~~iiJfiJ 1JijJB!.ijJ!ill1IlJrnnumI:)~-
'10
VIW.) l: T2. ~A~:9 r."'I
• =t>:?Enm,!lt=":/"'2m:~~~.lm-mmJrrc~-~ n I . ~

X ~£~mmm.wmmrn.:.ll'···~4.q!L im'i!ll- -='" .-•.- -====== • \) B I


IZ1 1_ 1"':'\
;!(1!iP.i-~·~.'ifrJi1JltlE~]i~lM]nrnm~· ~~f;'
'/....11
2. {; E!n= J:fl"f rn ~ ~ ~~ m t;l!lt Mt tt!i.':ft .::::::::;:-2:'- s:::::3'-'
_~~'.-~rr.-~Ql;1·;.ll~JtI1J;n~1r.jl!'nllr.l'·>::~'" --;~ •. -- • :~ =
Bl'C~=
It (lUllli f.m illiilrur illiItlliI!HWmH);i~~~=: 1.r~,('~F.:'s:m11Im m a:W:l m:f fm ~fEm.':lt-:-~--·­
V,OLA t\.\fW~Ui~L- lU·~~I.-~J.J"·4'.J"·f Jm~~j-=-~~;~
"'.LA Kfw lIlgJ!Hi!} ffllU HI lHiiiii1tfi HHJ::~~·,,:~,,-~::-f.t U:··fitl m mTr-:J ~ til ~ ~ mtt":1l._-...,-... ,·. • - .=:--=

~~~~~.~-~if!~1:g[~W~-Q1YUilt!~~~,,-
~~:mlH~~~'~~i!filllr{mmJ ~
, E!fi.=Ji'1"t,t!ti·
. ULLO .-=,,"'-' .~ £HI:f tuttJ
11I:~~~ ..Jm..m~;:~.u.JJ,,:oI~.4~~?

1ll!t':tlrf;'n"t~ -~
"'EEi£ B:E:£' sm-
;=UHUUffWI .- lfJIti §11
.. 0 . . - -
" c::::::::: $....?'''
i~
B.u~ ~;(=mmlliMmn:.mmJlll~:@i1F1lliYffifWfHf~"~ BASS " .-..~~~'9tlfii~ 'I' ~ ,"
~-(~lmU«UtHiWffHrfwrlilmDm~-im~ ,,.
n

·1
'*'- "'<AT M' ..,." At '"''
/t/l/'I. ihrr H.T -n~'TII'1C
, -
I

"
. ~
222

Ex. 7. Symphony No.6

eB.
fI'-==== 1ff >- If "1-
~ P-EPEAT A~) ~EPEAT,RAPlb,BuT NoT ToGETHER, EACH fLAYE1.
At" HIS OWN II\I~IVI)U~L S"Ee~. 7J1E COI/DUCToR INDICAT£$ THE 'ONE
CRESC. AtJ) 'J) 1M: '
223

rhythm music occurs less frequently but 'fantastic effects


are cultivated.
All instrumental and vocal executants are ca,lled upon.
Particularly striking are excerpts using only bell-like per-
cussion, which can be found in many of the band works, in-
cluding symphonies and the Requiem and Resurrection (1968),
as well as orchestral works such as Floating World (1964).
The following example is from the last named work. The modal
vocabulary of C-Db-F-G-Ab-A is used strictly, and each part
begins with the same descendin~ group. Yet 'each part is
different. Moreover the, durations, are different, so that
after the beginning of the passage~ the descending quintuplet
occurs at different times in each voice~ so that it is almost
always present. It acts as the repeate~ note endings in
Exs. 1 and 2" f.unctioning as a complex drone,. Hovhaness in-
cludes rolls on timpani and tamtam. (Rolls 'are entirely con-
sistent with free-rhythm procedure; they represent~ in fact~

the-siinplest special case of the technique.) Almost all


phrase groupings juxtapose three and five. The grouping of
four occurs in only two parts, once each. The dynamic pat-
tern is the reliable pp-ff-pp, but the scoring affords the
most colorful and powerful execution of it. Hovhanes's directs
the players to continue' the pattern~ mf, as accompaniment in
the ,ensuing bars~ where the main theme of the work appears
prominently in cellos.
The Leper King (1965) is an instance of a work that makes
224

Ex. 8

Ho/d~dl-t~ - - .
.
,~ ~
I

~~~~
;;--'.
J
, '---Hp. ,
.C~
oon&r;nae
pp :ffff_ =- pp
~ :
- ..
.0:
I~
~ ...
~ ~UL
~-

Ad lib.
(Hp.ll)
J
WIJ
~~~-~
bl::U ~. cont'r:nue ' I
""J. tfif= .PP II
: -
;
. r
,225

dramatic use of only one rhythmless passage (Ex. 9). It is


-£or 8-part chorus with trills on sleigh bells and bass drum.
The section begins EE. and there is a crescendo (marked "cre-
scendo po;ssible") to !1!f., but the"passage breaks off sudd6n- '.."
ly at that level. The bass drum part is tempered in the no-
,tation of its dynamics, to insure that it does not swamp the, '
remaining parts. The entire passage uses no notated pitches~

but only pictorial patterns of highs and lows. This notation


appears in Hovhaness's operas in non-rhythmless music as well
.(see Chapter VII, Ex. 22 also from The Leper King). There
·-1.s no modal tonic to emphasize as a~l' pa:rts Sing glissandi
continuously. Although its purely musical depth may be ques-
tioned, the passage is unmistakably powerful dramatically.
Ukiyo-Floating World has two dramatic examples of
rhythmless music for full orchestra~ After an impressive
'march section reaches ,its' climax, there occurs a symmetrical
structure in vlhich the main theme 'of the work is stated in
'full intensity, preceded and followed by orchestral rhythm-
less music. The dynamics are symmetrical. The first free-
rhythm passage begins ffff, and ends ~, where the second
one, with which the piece ends, begins'quietly but ends with
ffff in all parts. Thus the thematic statement is immediate-
ly preceded and followed by very quiet music. None 'of the
rhytp~ess.parts are continued through the thematic statement
in this case, making for a clear textural break between the
sections.
226

Ex. 9. The Leper King

Chor.
227

The entire first excerpt (three pages of score) is


quoted below. The whole orchestra, except strings, enters
at once" with stri.ngs tollowing. The maximwn intensity does
. not last .long as the trumpets soon are re~oved" tollowed by::
woodwinds"
. then the remaining
.
brass" and then the strings.
The drums are phased out similarly. Note, however" that
,
chimes and other bell-like instruments, which had their own
rhythmless music earlier in the work (Ex. 8) are no~ employed.
The actual employment of full orchestra with bell-like per-
cussion is very rare in any ot Hovhaness's music" though he
comes very close to complete tutti in many instances includ-
ing this one.
There is fairly strict a.dherence to the C Phrygian mode.
Significantly" the trombones contain most of the violation
of it, and these violations occur in glissandi in fairly high
"register, which are among the more clearly audible parts of
the texture. The use of 'E~ "Gb and two inflections of D
in the parts makes the trombones even more fierce in effect.
There is a general rapid staccato nature to the lines. There
"-are repeated notes" and plenty of rests. The strings play
even more rapidly. Significantly, the only held notes of
any duration at all are the high concert Bb's for the three

trumpets. Otberwise, the trumpet lines are very narrow (con-


cert Db and C exclusively, except for the scale-like curve
downward
.
after the high note
.
in each part) and not particular-
ly high in tessitura. Thus the instruments blend anonymously
228

into the texture except for the high""B. flats" which cut
through the entire orchestral sound like wild shrieks.
The woodwinds are a bit misleading in notation. The
apparen-t"'use of parallel cluster-like sounds is only visual.
Since each part plays at its own rhyt~ there is no strict
parallel coincidence of the parts. Particularly astringent
dissonance is not expected from these instruments. They do,
however, contain very many repeated notes, creating a com-
plex drone whose notes comprise the verticalization of a seg-
"ment of a C Phrygian scale.
In their very narrow range, low tessitura, and in the
scale-like dOl{Oward curve after the highpoints, the string
parts resemble the trumpets, though they achieve no compar-
able power on sustained high notes. In fact, due to tessi-
tura and their entry aftar the rest of the orchestra, they
are hardly perceived at all, until the end of the excerpt,
where they are exposed. Therefore", the passage not only is
a gradual decrescendo but includes a gradual transition of
tone colors. The strings inherit the music, as it were,
from the winds, but the change 1s so smooth as to be imper-
ceptible, though the tra.nsition from winds to strings is
obviously heard by the end ~f the excerpt.
The final rhythmless passage begins ~ with strings and
timpani. Some string parts use open strings for repeated
notes. There are implications of the main theme of the work
(Chapter III, Ex. 18) in several parts at different pitch
229

Ex. 10
..
.. ···Senza Misura. - ~. L¥peaC and ~4J:'... posstNy;O secp~ 43'
pknned c/I4os ..
!!~ .
-~~ !-~~
l¢~ ~!!:!I.~~
PI. 2
3
1../1 -- ::!:I
:;::=
==2 I
::;:: - - - !! ._-:;;: .
11 -.. ffff
J 1/\ #~ .....
. Ob. Ii!
i~
lfIJr;
. .A
- ~.&
r;
..a. ... .&
.....
.A!H. ..
,

EH.

Cl.2
I
I
f!
Yfff.... ~~ ~:!'! :!! ~~~
.- ~ -- ......... :
BII • l1ffbcf,.~ ~-e2- !lee. b..t.4L \Ic.e. ... !zcL _~""'.A
·.Bsn. Ii!
1 . ....
f'
LJ\ 'JftT ...... .. .
. l . • ~ .. .
.-
t - ~ .. ' r
I~ Ifif-
il'l
,. Iff! .. r
Hrn. :1\.. .~
Fa
i I
! f! . rJf
- -
..l..

-
..IL

--
.4
:. - .
1
!f!
Wi . ~
"":"'
b.p.:!:!ls·.....
r

- ... . .-
JIff- ----:-:-
i~ !l.a. ~~ -0- ..

Tt>p.2
B~
.J
rJff - .-

a
!~. ./. , .~ ~~~
. ..."
. I" fiff"
./. :f!;-ooo ..........
'" ,:.:." ... b.a.- ......
--
~- ... ... P;!:--%!:~~
r

-
t
Jjff
./':J. ___ .
.~

->
~- ... !J.A
. ~~~
(

lIYf:ft_+ ~- .... --~- ..... ~-~-~


·----5
:tf/I'
~

Tba.
"\ + ~ "It' :a::~
.. r
~. ~p.:
~ ~

Timp..
p. 1
G.Tam.
p. 2,3 1~~;t=::::;}.M IE
d7)
IF II J;;; JU IE ? ?!:::!?! J :!1j
L.BD. "\If/
S.~D. dim,..· .'
230

Ex. 10 (Continued)

1 ./) :
-.
Pl.~ -~

~
Ob.~ I~
11\
EH. i~

t ll\
01.2
B~ ~

Bsn.21 .
1~
HMI.~
F4
1 ~
T11>.§
Bt> tI
- P
1
T1"b. i
Tba.
~. ~.
Ti~p.
p. 1
- f .1":\ .

G.Tarn.
p. 2.3 a20
L.BD.
S.BD. "'\. f . .

. ~~~~and~~ na:~
41
.. ,.... .....
;..
VtI. 1
g+""'."w. ..... .,
... ;r
-1 U

~
~ ,~
4-
...
Vu.:!
J flfI+'''-
.--. - ~ .. + "w...,.
=
... ;;:
~
.
\I.~
" ..
-
--~----
Va. -...;;;;

·~T· .~
IN ~ c:==::! ... •
~

Ve. ....,..=-:
Cb.
at·co'ffff
'. - =
.
-- ....-
---lTV

"' .Ifff
231

Exo 10'(Continued)
45

~J\. 1. "'" .....


Ft. oS ' ~

=
,~

p
I~ Ob. ~ ~

Ob. ~
I~

III = P
EH. ..... ~

1
2
I_
_A = P
01. t:'\ ~

.p
= ~sn
"'" 1':\
Bsn. ~
p
Hm. .3~
~ = HM!. r...
F4 i
P
III . 1':\ ;. ~

T11>.2
'-
1\ Trp. ~' t:'\' . ~,

, B~ ~
Trp.
11 r.-. I"!"\ 1':\

i
I
2
Trb. ..... ~,.
T1"h. 3
. P
Tha . I"!'> ~
Tba.
I'
iJ
~
1':\
P .
~.
'
,

Tittti'. ).!;
o/,T.l:::::. ;;r
p. 2.3 8.2 t:\ ..... ..... ~!
L.BD.
S.BD. pp .P6LIC. .!J .70'£~Chtmes add~. 7.Jliamabwrr af.] 4 :
1.11. "!f .
ViI. 1
I~ JP
Vh~2
II P.P
Va.
;p
Vo.
pp
Cb.
'" .PP
232

levels. Some of these are marked in the example. below with


x·s. When the woodwinds enter 'they also sugg~st this main
theme. Also the triplets and duplets marked z give the in-
terval of the seventh which is t:;O"~prominent in the theme. '.
Even the horn entry contains a hint of the t,heme' s .septuplet
scalar flourish. The trombone parts are. less important the-
matically" but create a dynamic "smear" of glissandi. The
trumpets' entrance resembles their music in the earlier
rhythmless passage. There is even a part for chimes at the
end" though it is very hard to hear in performance. For the .
. ---most part the. 9' ~hrygian mode is used" and the speed is as
fast as the first occasion. But the chromatic hints of the
woodwinds and t·he insistent repeated· open strings make for a
more nervous effect. The crescendo is carefully paced so
that each new entry is reasonably audible; e.ach part enters
not ~ but at the dynamic level that the orchestra has already
reached. The only exception is the final chimes part. The
percussion have restrained dynamics until the very end when
all parts have ffff; at the last moments the drums and tamtam
do overtake the orchestra.
As Lousadzak demonstrated the inception of the free-
rhythm style" so the Symphony No. 19 "Vishnu" (1966)" seems
to represent its culmination, at least up t9 this writing.
This large one movement work makes extensive use of the
rhythmless technique. Particularly in the first half of the
work, rhythmless music is entirely predoml.narit. There are
233

Ex. 11

Timp.
pp

~.l

Vn.2

Va.'
.....

Va
1'_-

arco ....= ----


.

C1>. .PP cPesc.


234

Ex. 11 (Continued)
~,,,,~ ~ .Pe~, no~ ~~
a. .,pos-sa& ;0 .,$~ 2...
z ~ 1:;:
~ k~b.a. .. ... ~b...
.• JJ ~l:
- ~ ~
-
.~===--
- :r: -:!::t:
~.
~,

I~ . "7-if/; ...
Cr>esa .2
~
=--
:a.
E:..E
~
~ ::: ~ ~:!: ~ ez'. ~:!:
Fl. 2
....--.~

'1H-/rCl'es~ ~
..~'= e: ~~
4
I fJ • ~ ~ *-- =~ ~ ~ .~

-.
'",.

-
t
~ -1Jl/~~~h ~ . ~z.. ~

~- ~ ~ cr>e~a:;=
Ob. 'l+~.. .::- ... F ~z.. ~

~
:±=:!:::! ~

. :..
7Jl/ ~=..ct't'Sc.r ..====..
2
--u

_a ---
+.'
- 2.
EH.
-.
~

~ -
"7 I:.t cr>esc.; == ====
:
-'~-'

. ~- . 9
t :.-'

.. ..
-_&LUX;; ~.r-

- --ct· 4
fI
~ .2-: CFesC.~ ~
~ @z,.
B" 2 t~
• -
~
mf~ Cr>eSC~ ~
. _- -. "':'-1-
~ Sa.
. .;U: ~..
=., e
~ .. ~itIL~~ ..
....."- -
%.

Bsn. m.r ~ ct"eSaa=?7.


~
c
~
=
~» ;" .... ~.,
==
%.
2
I'
[.;
'":/-~ ~A""CZSC..= ===:' .

== l!IiII~:I~
=1~
Timp.
p. 1 '1 JP
~
a.Tam . ~.
p. 2
ViD.
7b .£4Ppe Lio:.s:s- AOf.Im ,.... I
.....
[)I .
'"\hl. 1
II~ "':I
----:viI. 2
~
Mf
Va..
'Y
Vc.
»tf
Ch. ,
235

Ex. 11 (Continued.)
'55
1461'
1 fJ
FI. ..52 .
;~. .~ •.
l' 111 "
Ob. 2
~

r''J
EH. ~

1 II
Cl. 2
B' J

t
Bsn. 2
~ ~ ~PJ'rd r-~, m;l.1' ~ptiier.. P ;...
~ -:.= _.;......... ;..,.. . b...
1
~

II '0/ """'= C1"8St:.


.
- .........
,
-~ fit!
- cr-esc..
. - :

---=--
- . ----
. o· ;.. .. ~ '.

---- .-
l

-
I~
~
0/ =::; --=:I
cr-esc.. ... ,
.
~
m.I C:;::::::;--C.t"e3c.

Tha. !~.

I' "!I">:. y~ .... 1i= T ~'T cMs-a -H-" ... 1/9- .... ... ~
Timp.
- -,.poco ope.sc,

:
--:-.p. 1 IP
. G.Tam.

L.BD. I::
p.2.

~ pp
t:\
tt""·
pCO Cl"'esa
.....,....,.'
I.
. -~. 1
I~
III I
Vn.2
11
I
Va. .
f
Ve.
I
Cb. "\
f
236

Ex. 11 (Continued)

56

t ~ ~ '.

PI. ~ 14
·1 A
Ob. .2
[7
/I
EH.
~
11\

CJ..e 1
7
"

1.
Bsn. .2
:2
Il: •
H p4
--.... _....
.' ~.3 :J
"'1
~~ar.4~qp&~~ ~~~ ..... ~ A_
- --1 ,..... "';". . . .~

T1'h.2
J -
... cpesc.
.. ~~ ...
~
- ~ ___. .s..-_
~
.... - ..

a
'1:_. :. ___ l Czoesc.
...... ~
....- .11.-+---.. I,
~

Tbt!.
'1 Cr.~e.sc.
J
I
'----Timp. "
IJ ~

p. 1
'G. Tam.
P.2
L.BD'1'\ I:: i--
1-/\
~. p .
: - ~
. ,

~I
'"\it. 1 j
C.PeSC.
.- Il '.

"Vit. 2
"'1 C~c.

·Va.
CJl'e~

.. -Vc. ~ •• -<

cr.-esc.

Cb
"\ Cr>esa
'-
237

Ex. 11 (Continued)
. ,·0'>"· '• .
". -
:"~ .;.~ "
. '

'. "
, .',
57
" ,

".' ~ .

;y
1 ~
PI. ~
1
!~
Ob.2
~
EH. ,~

i ~.
ct.2.
BII II
1
Bsn.2
, '1 ~
, H1~.~
, F L-'~.z>~and ~6 J'U1C ~<'~:
i~ .
~~ . . . . .
-
_l ' -"/:.' . .. . . . . ~.!
1
!~ f,--c'Z"C'Sa. - ~ .. b..... ........ /If
T1>p.2
p}

• oS
I'
il}
"'-:::!.

f cZ'>eSa
, ~- ~ ... ,
;;;
.. ~ , IH
jl cZ"esa : fII
1 , J
Tt-D. ~
i
Too.
. Ti1np.
L ~
poco ct?esc..
p. 1 ~

. G.Tam
,p. 2 ~
L.BD.f'
lA poco c-r"e.sc.
"Vit. 1
I~ If ' '

Vn.2. !

I' fI
Vd.
Vc. II ff
Ch.
"' .ff
.", ..
238

Ex. 11 (Continued)
'58

. -:~,~

:Dff

JfIf'

: gil

1
1 $2 .j t? c: & : ri'$ .I! 7

~es~ pass-fPik Jlffl


I-
•• A.

~a pas'siOile : ffffl
Tba.
I
1-- ~
. O.re.sc:. po.s:sWk
.. ... Ifff
Timp. "
-
p. t I "Y~ OJeSa /JOSSaaa Ji7l1-
3iOo~

G.Tam · i
I pp~ CL'l!!SC.pas:si/Zk
IfffJ
P.2 J --
·L.BD
· 1/\ ~:f
C~:.~.-.s ~pa..I"epem:mrL ~
ffff
P. .9
L.Ch
m;vk · ~;;,
~V· ,"lIT ...
C~'r!ZS"C. po.s:s£Jd.e Ifff"
Vn. ! ..

I~ , flf cpe.sa~Wik Iff;-

.. 14 iff ~~a passade hlfl


Va. Jff . - ...- - O.Pes-a pas-sl:6de : ffff
-ve.
.. , 7Jf CJ-esc.passiOi/.e :: ffffl
Cb.
"" 'fit C.l"esc. pr:;s.riOik /Iff
239

brief· melodic and canonic sections in more or less conven-


tional notation (although sometimes senza m1sur~) but these
are not usually long, and are quite static. Moreover, they
are often accompanied by rhythnU.ess music. In all, there ,~.

are few passages where rhythmless music is missing.


Most of the rhythmless music observes the pp--ff--pp
pattern completely, or uses half of it (pp--ff, or ff--pp).
Occasionally a crescendo for one group of instruments breaks
off at ff and is answered in other instruments, either by a
symmetrical decrescendo beginning ff, or by a quick drop to
---pp ·a.nd another crescendo. Conse.cutive rhythmless passages
.:J
usually juxtapose instrumental colors quite sharply •
In Ex. 12, the opening of the work, the composer delib-
erately uses a rather sparse grouping--a "broken consort"
using only one trombone, tuba, bass drum and timpani with
tamtam trill. The profuse trombone glissandi would yield a
generally atonal character, but the low tuba note and the
tampani establish the modal center of Fe After a partial
crescendo, one horn and two trumpets join the pattern (not
sh'own). There is a full crescendo to ffff, and then a pas-
sage for 20 string parts, juxtaposing glissandi with running
scale patterns (EX. 13). Bell-like instruments enter next
(EX. 14). In their passage, each part is modally Simple,
but the different instruments are in completely different
·keys •.
The sparse passage of the opening, the complex string
240

Ex. 12

'SiMPHONY No.19
Visl}nu ALAN HOVHANESS 01'.217
/$ se~ (pneY pne cftesc.)
t../l .1":"1. I

2
3
IJ .
1
2 .
,1J. t:"I
3

,
~

~~ . "~i -....
1
p - ~
-~
"

-1:\
.~ :

- ..
Tulla ;
--

~ p-~ +~ .~

.
Timpani : :
p-.~.--.
.. ,-
,
Peroussion 1
Bass Drum
: - - -
p
- - -l'~on 21 : f....f:\ ,
Tam-tam i\pp
LA 01':"1
"Vto1tn 1 ~

11 f:'I ;

Vtolln2 I
, :
r.t
.'Viola
1":\
'Violoncello
.r.'\
:

"
"
241

. Ex. 13
[gI Senza misu!"4 JS St;atn4 (~~, ~1"'4C,)
1 .JI~ f!\
.~
1 " I'!'\

.~ r-~'

lba
I'!'\
-
~ I'!'\
Tirol'
P.l .r.t
-
Bd~ Sf.<pp!
P.2
· PI' h, Ghek
: f:::' IP
Tam.
~~~~ ~~, ~,,-,;~
-.
1<-
I IAt;q~~ ~,~ ~~:!: r;;-A $: iP
I co.~I

~.1 I~ ~~I.","A .... A


__ •• _ .(>11_- __ .. I!.=••.•
• .......
~~ e:::.---
if! ;p
:,~,~

~
I~ pp~, ~ ... .,.~. _.. .~,
-=z;;r
~"'--

.-
•••••• =N - pp
~.I

-. -
...--"". .'
,~.
I
·
r

I~PI:£P.
'A r .. -::?~
~~~
~ ...f.ff= lP
- I e<~.
·. I
• IULi~
"-"-

..--..... .,;:::. -....... .......... Pf= ·n


'<i¥.I
~.2 1,,-
'IP?
~~~,
-
~
IJf pp
~ttJp.I
~'W_~ :$;
~~.
~

I - - .--. .
, .1;j$~"'.A ...-::::=3!: ~±.
. -~~

~;;.
-
1' ••
-::::=-0=

: ..... ;:p
I

..
:~t:¢' .I
7E:~iS$';
$ab. Iff -./p ..
-::---- ,.
·VI. ~ H' .. ~~=- ... :fff= 7P
""
·
-- ... - ~.I
r.r ...... ~

T 6= .

I
'r~

-
-.s~JiJ~ '. ........... .,...t..
""
~
~
~
.......
. ..,.........;.
:m:
::::::;:::; ~i
.r..t
I

• Z~
..- . $: -RJ]
I

."" """'" -.
.
...... . --+
I
...---.:;:+ ·
~.
EP~I._.

.. tT1'7 IP

,
~
. ..... - ~

iJ!J7••
. -~~
-r ....._L~~ eo·· e
.......-.;:;;.... 'It~ -- :::.f)) 7
sap.I
, .....""
JP
10:-,.....;I
:
;--,.-n~?fJ;i~
...... - ---
_~<t.,. ..
Sal (1l~.
-
"11'.~~
.-::--. ==fiJ'= . ~
I
, .s~~ ..... -c: ;;;;;;;;;;;a

---_ m= n
'~~.I

.,.~- I,
·'ct>. .< W-e-'·~ ~ :8= -pp .;

~.~ ~- . - - - .
w'. ~ ~,~ --_.........~
a· A .~. 1

--
C-~.

..... ·i;~. :$; .r.r ·


I .''P ::~.::;.~~~~ ..... p:~~ - I
~==.=!.A"
•• ..,,- -. .. - .

con#nue
• ~ -~"."""-:
~

,~
~ .••

A# w..:Yfi-~nl1, ~-=:/I'~q4'~U~~
..
=m= -;:p
'T

JV~ IM{y #hI~ ~~.


242

Ex. 14

- 0

P.I ./ "='
Bd~ ..

P.2 I"
.Atlegt'O
.. ~

P.2 IfJ7 Tam.

-
.~ .J. .;. d _ ..-

Glock. ~~~ .. -. iI ~ • . - SJrq>!


~ppp ~.

.Iff-- pp
P.S ~~.e~~~
. ~&,t.~~~»a~f:
Vibr. I
1\

PP'
~.

Alw-sr.s-Holdpe.:lJ
.:" - (
pp
..
- '
I

1
5=
P.4 II .~-~
-_.
........ 'Iq)!
VHmlI '-"'"
J PP~A/H-1!P" b~ . =iJJ= -pp
-p. 5 A ~ ~
.
~im.I
pp
.!
~.PP
A/';;bU~1 . Jil=
P.C) II ....... ~

:;hlm.n .. /

~ PP-C>Ar#~b§~ =f!!- --Pi-'

I" .
• 4 ~ ~ r~p;:a
.~J;'

=fII "Y ~,I


Hp.l "1'JIi IT_ conc-rnae
o . , - .

. -.

I" . ~-
-.
•t' : -
F'
~

l[ --- 8=
conc.r-nae
"Jo/'
.rzp/
Cf
"".r:.IT .
.
.
"• :
I ! ..i. .J..d JJ--",~ :];;-~;;.".-'o/l
eel.
~IJJP1 ~m
conc.inae
.-
~
243

texture and the bells each come back later in the first sec-
tion of the worko The opening page (Ex. 12) is, in fact,
repeated exactly, at one point. The others are repeated in
character' and scoring, and in much of the detail as well •. '-I
The climax of the first portion of the work is a passage
for full orchestra (Ex. 15). After the strings begin wild·
runs (not shown), firmly in F Mixolydian, the next entry sud-
denly employs all the winds save trumpets, while the string
texture is maintained. The horn passage is derived from the
first horn writing just after the beginning of the work; the
"parts for the trombones and tuba also derive from the opening.
The woodwinds present repeated notes, and considerable dis-
sonance, with chromatically suggestive runs in piccolo.,
English horn, and contra-bassoon. The trumpets enter, em-
phasizing G#, A and Bb. They do not. detract from the modal
center of F; instead they provide major-minor juxtapositions,
and add the fourth degree (Bb) as a prominent dissonance in .
powerful high range.
There is a tremendous crescendo, and the passage breaks
orf giving way to a !!!f burst of rhythmless sound in bells.
Each part has the five-note grouping of a major-~~nor chord
with added major sixth, but each one is in a different key,
making for achromatic situation. The timpani retain F for
their trill but t.his is not suffic:tent to mediate the dispute
. ·of keys in all the other parts •
Many of the passages mentioned recur, in principle if
244

Ex. 15 . ,'.~

..-A!l~o 'LSI~
.. _... -
~ .. ',~. '..~.'
~
' '.

~= ~=~ .'==-- ~=
It!_~!!
.A
J
I~ -{,~.. fI:~"'J:t:
~~;!~ ~~EE ,~~. '~--i~
.Picc.
-
I_"'!~ ::=~~~
.,
=-== :: ;::
-.:~ .' .
-1Jr
t
n :-Lt... ~ ~ .... tr.. .... ~ _~ ....t.. ..... _U.a
·:Ob· 2 r

EH.
~ of
- . - ~-
:,Iff

~.-!; ~..Ii!:-~~~ 14t.'~ IJJ


". . ~.4:JI!

\J
i~. /If
I" fWi-- ::-
W'~ Ifi~ ~~i= ~~.~ -Iii Ifi~ Iff
Bsn.~
/.""" ~ ~~ .... .wJ~ -Iff
CbSfl.
~ ,"'LA
:
.',:4
.... 1'4. .-. ......a ~ .. .... ~
...
r.-.... _ Iff
·-.1
t i~ .:f ...
to
~D

...... /: ;. .....-:: .. - Jff
2
'~ f;;' ~;:o..- ,...,I:"'" ~.
~
H~n. ""l..
....., /Jf
Fg ' .
~
.t ,~. .f.~
..- ~ !"t:'_ ....... -.-..
_. ~
,-
Iff
4
A, f"
- -
:::- .- - JO:\
.
.:::c".
ffI
t .. -
'~
Ad I'!\
.Trp.2 ;

1!i ~, ~

- ~-- L--:: •• "4 •• ~~ ~~~~ .i~'-~.¥' .


t - - -
'f.----.... ro .• -::-. ....-;:
~

= /Jl
Tt'h.2
, !
.... -
/":';-:::-~-f:.-~~U,
~
-
~---
.-t......-
I. ......~ ..........~_
~ - A-."1--.,.-.R.-rP,--.,.-A-.';::,.
.~=--.::!.-.
-- ~22U
=/H
3 - -
f ~
: ffI
:.~
rf;;:a
. .~ l ~
. Tba. !
<
ZUZt.
~
I\.t:~ P+~.1 =J1.f
Timp. ~:~
p.t
'!~m.

i' pI.:)
~
~'IIdo
~:lIo'!IIC~~_ ~ ........
-
~ 1ildil1i04II~'IIIGftf~ ~~~ 1odIo:~~ . .:.!IIo_IIOC!IoE~

- ~

l..\ . :/J't/
Yh.t ~ ~c:u=:e

fI f
- Iff
Vn.2 ,=
f? f·
'?=-r
Iff
Va. e o-t:t=tf =-gk=u=_e

~
I

:9
o~
Ve. - (i

. br
~
M'"'''' _ ...."M..
Cb. - .e~~-f£,=u:= -
.fff
245

, I Ex. 15 (Continu~d)
(g§J Senza misur3 AUego J5JecKllTS - C.t"t!U~~lII/t" ilU
.A
1
Fl. 2 st.?p!
i~ J:Dr
Picc. "
C"fq.!

~
ffff
Ob.~ i. P e ,1 n: e e n b .: ~ ,I
.fJiT
EH. ~
I'
t'~--£- :T:: 1'7 t.e=
ff'u-
~,I

Ct.A i4i ~
~.I
s· I;;
, fff.f
Bel. r. I
I' j)J7
, I
v--- C"~,I
Bsn'2
IJJY
C'DSfl. l'ooIA
-T'
I

~ J1ff
1 -T'
I

I'; , : IJJJ'
I....r.. I
2
·
F~ (~
Ht-n. IJff
i! I'LJZ...E:. t- t:2: , ~
~
f
Off
fA I"Up,f

~ .~ ~ ~'d, .U-Af:_1:~ ... 1:1:1; ... 1:~ ... ~ fD7


I.,., I
,
I
·
--T~. 2
!~_ ;{.'7J. ..
~.,.~ ~~ ~ ~ ...~ ...+ ~"6ISDo ~6il"
JJJ7
,<>'L
0'
I
F ,11f!.
l:
f..,. .... k+
' k " 1+... j';~AU. A• .1. '/- ... ...""~ ~"esC! ,/'<1Pikb ffff
;~
f
rr-"7 cHoSe! p..rlaik flff ·
, 1I 'tdp.I
iTo
~,f
DO
¥.f
m:r
:
Tba ¥I
~ ~ :fff/
Tlmp. - !), .. -.::;.,
~~..'I:'t"' .....

EI I~
-
Tarn.
l, r .H
Sup.f
'\-D.l
I~ f.f1T
'\b. 2
Ifff
.I
I'
I
Va. !vp!
.fJff
Vc. -
jJff
I

Ch. 'lop!
ifJY
"
246

not in actual fact~ later in the pie~c~ which~ to this pOint,


1s only about one quarter over. However, neither the pcwer-
fui orchestral passage (Ex. 15) or the answering bell clamor
(Ex. 16>" ever appears later. Thereare~ however, interestfng
rhythmless passages of other types. One instance involves
the indication "bird-like." Whi~e s~rings sustain a IIwhi te-
note" chord, emphasizing A and D and with C missing, two
flutes, piccolo, two harps and celesta play delicate runs.
The celesta exploits low register. Despite the speed, the
runs are not stepwise all the time. Except for some actual
- -----scale groups, C is avoided, and ,the implications even become
pentatonic in some of the parts where skips of thirds occur
regularly in what would otherwise be scales. There are no
repeated notes, and the individual patterns are long. The
effect is airy and open, unusually peaceful, especially in
view of the composer's tendency to express such emotions in
any but this aspect of his idiom.
'Although Vishnu appears to carry free rhythm music to
its extreme it seems clear from such passages as Ex. 17, that
the possibilities of sonority implicit in the technique have
hardly been exhausted. However, after building an entire
wQrk by the brute force and kaleidescopic effects of rhythm-
less writing'once, it is hardly necessary to do it again.
- - Perhaps t~e future of Hovhaness's usage of the style lies in
,the judicious emplo~~ent,of isolated but unusual rhythmless
passages within works otherwise in conventional notation.
247

Ex. 16

. .1251 Set1Zc'l misut"a" 25 se.:"n4s


~.ttt0 _~
.Timp.
....""
rn~~;~f!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!ll
Ir.->'u
....

. .
. .
.
__ ~!
..
c;jg}/

Pol
Tarn.

IJ ~ . -...,

P.4
·---·-VIbP.·n

Hp.I
lpe:::'

Hp.·n

eel. _==*' •
:::1
248

Ex. 17

;I ,

1
:
.j
.

I ~ p --
1\
s-...
~:
-.

I P
Jit. t < A
fl
S~····~
~.

I~ p
III ~~--------------------------------------------------------~---------------------------------------~

:Jt.2
249

Ex. 17 (Continued)
," "

Itl~
250

In recent works such as Fra Angelico, And God Created Great


Whales and others, this 1s his approach.
251

CHAPTER IX

STRING QUARTET NO.1" OPUS 8

Hovhaness wrote his first string.quartet in 1936~ It


has four movements. The second and last are·fugues~ and the
first ana third have the nature of preludes. The work is of
interest for several reasons. It is a good e xarnp Ie of un-
edited first period style" it exemplifies this style at its
best, and three of its four movements re-appear i~ the third
period in orchestral works. In this chapter, comparisons
will be made With the relevant later works--the Prelude and
Quadruple Fugue (1954), and the midd~e movement of Mysterious
Mountain (1955). Specifically, the Prelude and Quadruple
Fugue is an orchestration of the first two movements" and
. -
. -·-the second subject material of the double fugue of Mysterious
Mountain is based on the fourth movement of the quartet. To
this author IS kno\,Tledge, the third movement of the quartet
occurs nO\'lhere else in Hovhaness I s music.
··Like -many first period works, this quartet combines the
modal vocabulary, serious feelings a~d largely diatonic vo-
cabulary which t3~ify the mature composer with hints of styles
that were ultimately rejected in his later writing. In this
case, one finds occasional melodic chI-omaticism and some d:!.s-

sonant harmonies that resemble classical seventh chords.
252

Quartet No. l-I'<iovement 1 "prelude"


The movement is terna.ry. The first section uses a typi-
cally narrow melody. for viola. Notes sound on all beats,
which is also typical. The accompaniment consists of strummed
chords of D Major, D Minor, Eb Major and E Minor. No normal
tonal cadential patterns occur. The Eb Major and E Minor
chords include an added sixth, the low C in the cello, which
may be employed more for instrumental reasons than harmonic
value. All the chords in the cello are quadruple stops in
which two notes are open. In order to retain this pattern,
... "Which gives richness without creating playing difficulty" the
low C is convenient. In any case" the harmonic value cannot
be ignored, and it is an instance that would not occur in
later Hovhaness.
The opening of the solo viola melody is quoted above
(Chapter II, Ex. 1). The line revolves more around the fifth
than the tonic of the mode. 'The only accidental other than
Cb 1s B~ which" of course" is the same approximate pitch.
The middle section is contrapuntal. The cello maintains
its chordal accompaniment while the violins and viola have
contrapuntal material based on this subjeci;:

Ex. 1
'"
253

The skips (z in Ex. 1) involve only the tonic and fifth


degrees, and thus help to strengthen the sense of a modal
center. Most of the material is stepwise, ~nd the subject
itself p~ovides a close juxtaposition of diatonic and chro-
matic motion. As the counterpoint progresses, these two
types (as x and y in Ex. 1) occur in vertical combination,
leading to two-against-three patterns rhythmically while
creating considerable dissonance. But the clarity of harmon-
ic background and the scalar motion lessen the effect of such .
.clashes considerably.
The opening viola line is repeated in a higher register
by the first violin. The second violin sometimes doubles
and sometimes adds counterpoint. The heavy multiple-stops
of the opening are replaced by slow arpeggios in the lower
instruments.
The chordal coda introduces additional flats. There 1s
an interesting harmonic progression, suggestive of the Phrygian
or even the Locrian mode (due to Ab in the penulti~ate chord)
but its triadic nature is somewhat distorted. This happens
because the cello is dissonant with the top three instruments
until the last chord (EX. 2).

Prelude and Quadruple Fugqe' - Prelude


The orchestral version of the prelude is remarkably
similar. The material from the beginning almost to the coda
is orchestrated without alteration. Added coloristic effects
in third period style occupy the pizzicato douole-bass part,
254

·Ex. 2

which is dissonant ,,11th the rest of the orchestra. This


part is cyclic~ involving a l2-note sequence of pitches each
occurring at regular intervals of five beats in ~ time. The
'composer retains the dissonances in the opening section in-
volving the low C in the cello~ but he does make changes in
the coda. The first alteration is a bit before the actual
chordal ending. In both works' the first violin restates
most of the viola line in a high reglster~ descending to
finish it in its original register just befor.e the coda. The
measure in which the downward motion occurs is rapid~ and the
rhythm is the same in both piecese However~ the actual line
·is changed.
The new version enables the melody to attain a tonic D
as a high point~ before going downward. It therefore has
'greater range and more melodic arch. This version is' also
somewhat less chromatic.
255

Ex. 3. Quartet No.1

Ex. 4. Prelude and Quadruple Fugue

. The al te?:'~t;ton in the coda eliminates all dissonance


and makes the progression more chromatic_ The chords are:

Ex. 5

L ~: M~ -:;, :,.~',
A.' ..,..
~ ~.~J1)~'~~'
J.
10,..
, I"" ....
I~
t. 5'1 .1
!L .'ff'
-"'" ,
.U
~ D ll'
..
~, C ~-.

I
,
- .........-. , . - :

I'AI ...
. .
,.
II
:.A

- -
.- 1
, ..
t- I.
" ....
1

"
g •

I
-. I
I I'" P'
.
"
Quartet No. l-Movement 2
Ii Quadruple Fugue II

The four subjects are quoted as Exs. 9~l2 of Chapter VI.


The .first two make use of chromatic scale figures, and the
.last two are entirely di'atonic. The basic form of the large
movement is quite schematic. E~positions of each subject
alternate with episodic passages in which the subjects ex-
posed up to that point are used in combination. After the
first exposition, the subject is comb:i. :n~d with itself in
strettc,,""a.s there a.re no additional subjects to use "lith it.
However, from that point on, all the episodes do involve ver-
tical combinations of different subjects.
Naturally, the most important fact about these four sub-
jects is that they fit together. As -they ~re of different
lengths, the combination does not use all voices together
-for long. The only way they are used in combination is shown
... in Ex. 6. The distribution of the _subjects in different
octaves is changeable fairly freely, but-the pOints of en-
trance are not.
As in the fugal section of the prelude, the polyphony
sometimes leads to dissonant combinations, especially when
one or more· lines have chromatic scales. Usually, however;
the chordal background is quite clear, and the speed of the
movement (Allegro Moderato) mitigates against perception of
real dissonance. The harmonic background is clearer in the
last two subjects, due to the emphasis on tonic and fifth.
This fact and the general cumulative design cause the music
to gather tonal character as it progresses. In the exposi-
tion of the fourth subject, for example, Hovhaness _.llploys a
tonal answer; the opening D-A of the subject is answe ..'ed by
A-n, and not A-E.
257

Ex. 6

.:--
.'" I

fn - .~
._. f f ~d
II
I F i~
~ . ..
-
- .- .
-
u
~

.. - ~
.. I

-' -
--
• - - -----
..----:- , i -4 I

"9-

The cumulative design is enhanced by the choice of coun-


tersubjects. Each exposition does, in fact, involve a counter-
subject. These are quoted in Exs. 7-10:

Ex. 7
258

Ex. 8

"JpJeJaIJhnmJ, _I
t "iUJ. §qIJ, ahe 81
Ex. 9

Ex. 10

The light first countersubject provides a contrast to


the stepwise subject. The se,cond uses very, fast notes, but
is associated with very quiet dynamics. So the second ex-
position builds speed rather than for~e. The third counter-
subject has the prominent arpeggiated triad at x. In later
~pisodic passages this figure is appended to the beginnings
of the first and second subjects:
. 259

which causes the listenel" to form all association between the·


third exposition and the two which precede it which would not
have been apparent earlier.
The fourth exposition is the quickest and most intense.
·The countersubject fits with the subje~t in such·~ way as to
. lead to a texture in which one voic.e or another always has
sixteenth-notes. Frequently they occur Simultaneously in
several voices.
The coda of the fugue is built up from this density of
sixteenths. All voices have sixteerith-note writing up to
..
·the final chords, and there are no c·lear references to any
of the. subjects or countersubjects·. The parts vascillate
among long drone notes, repeated Sixteenths, .real melodies
and intermediate typeso The dynarnicsvary, with several
crescendo and diminuendo indications, and the parts traverse·
several tessituras. The effect is wave-like; it seems an al-.
most graphic sea-music, although there is no programmatic or
pictorial intent. The entire passage. is diatonic until the
end where a chromatic scale fragment appears in the second
violin. ThiS, in turn,. leads to the final diatonic chords,
which involve only open fourths and fifths:
260

. ""cresco -- ...... _--- ---.'

Prelude and Quadruple Fugue - "Fugue','


Despite the length of the second moveme"nt of the quartet"
. even fewer changes take place in its orchestration than in
-that ·of the prelude. The scoring is fairly conventional with
the addition of some coloristic double bass interpolations
in t,he second subject exposition. In the fourth exposition
the subject is doubled by winds which sustain pitches while
the repeated notes occur in the strings. This continues in
the coda. But no real musical changes occur until the last
bars. The actual chords of the end of Ex. 12 appear but with
two al tera tions. A nel'T chord--an open fourth F-Bb is inserted
after 'i;he C chord" thus repeating the root movement sequence
261

of. a major' second downward. The final chord is made major,


where the quartet uses an open fifth. These changes create
greater richness, prolong the progression
, ,
slightly and give
a hint of non-diatonic writing, in the chromatic suggestion
implicit in the two inflections of F in consecutive chords
near the end.
In examining the Prelude and Quadruple Fugue, it is ap-.
parent that Hovhaness did try to make improvements, especially
at the endings, but also in a few internal subtleties. In
,view of this, it is quite surprisin.g tc? note just hm'l little
has been changed. And what change~ do occur, including even
the dissonant hints of the double basses', seem to fit in per-
fectly, and the work hardly sounds as if it was the product
of two different periods some twenty years apart.

Quartet No. I-Movement 3


Adagio Lamentando ll
. II -

The third movement of the quartet is ternary and opens


with a narrow melody for viola as in the first movement. The
viola
. solo has some--chromatic
-
motion, but also some prominent
augmented seconds. The accompaniment is a simple line in the
cello, resulting in open consonances most of the time, ~dth

an .. occasional tritone.The, figure marked x in Ex. 13 is a


typical instance of short-long rhythm in this excerpt which
is otherwise not typical.
The middle sectio~ is itself sectional. The first part
of it dwells on the arpeggiation of ,a 13th chord over a tonic
262

Ex. 13

. ,
'. '"
•~

:~
T r

(E) pedal. Of course, the actual vertical combinations are


rather thin, but the continuing movement by thirds suggests
the complex chord:

Ex. 14

Follo'\'Ting this, the musi·c develops figure x of Ex. 13.


·The section includes some 'short-long chordal proclamations·
and one- case l'l'here x occurs against its own inversion. Here
is an extract:

Ex. 15
263

At letter C in the score the cello begins a'fugato on,


Ex. 16. The first bar of the subject is a bit, monotonous;
only two lower neighbors rescue it from being completely
stationery. Note~ though, that these neighbors, which lead
to slightly quicker motion,. appear characteristically on the
first beat of each half bar. .The fugato resembles the one in
the first movement, although it moves very SlO\,11y harmonica,.l..·
1y, due to the static nature of the theme.

Ex. 16

The first section returns with the "opening material


again in cello and viola, accompanied by os~inato repetitions
·of the· firs t bar of Ex. 16 in the violins, on· the pi tche s E
and B. The chordal coda centers on those notes ,\,li th other
chords formed from their neighbor notes. These are consonant
in sound although one of them is notated as a diminished
fourth (A#-D).
This movement has a typical first period fugal section,
and some strong augment~d second effects, along with several
rhythmic and melodic mannerisms that are Hovhaness's own.
H01'leVer, in its sectional character and in some of the spe-
cific sounds, it is hardly a cryst~llized ,statement of his
idiom. It would appear to be the weakest movement of the
264

quartet. The fact that Hovhaness neg~ected only thi~ move-


ment in borrowing for future works suggests that, despite
the size and facility of his output, he is capable of objec-
tive discernment of the relative quality of his efforts.

Que.,z:tet No. I-Movement 4 "Fugue"


This fugue is light in scoring and effect. The marking
is "Allegro Gaio, n and the fugue i~ simpler and shorter than.
the quadruple fugue which 1s certainly the weightiest move-
ment·. The subject and most of the counterpoint use no long
notes. Diatonic l'1riting prevails •. The subject has some run-
- -
ning motion and a characteristic aitern~tion of the root and
third of the mode. The first bar seems to create the energy
for the more interesting second bar:

Ex. 17

There is a routine exposition (with real answers) and


the episodes proceed immediately to stretto designs based on
. parts of the subject. The 'overlapping is sometimes so close
. that the ~istener perceives little real counterpoint but
merely a textural rush where figures retain their pitch
~evels but are quickly' tossed from one instrument to another.
The effects range from the simple instance of Ex. 18 to the
overlapping scales of Ex.
Ex. 18

, .

There are no modulations~ although two inflections each.


of Fls and Bls occuro The work finishes on D, which was the
tonic for the other movements. After the last of the canons
there is a coda with all parts in running sixteenth notes,
resembling·the ending of the quadruple fugue. There is a
concluding chordal pas~age, interrupted by a hint of Ex. 18,
but ending with a sustained open fifth. Note that the first
,i.
266

:t'ew bars of this enciing .(Ex. 20) use some diatonic dissonances
such as seventh chords.

Mysterious Mountain-Double Fugue


The second movement of the Symphony No. 2 "Mysterious
Mountainll presents interesting dating problems. This section
is a double fugue~ couched between two chordal movements in
complex meters~ which are clearly generic to the third period.
Its first part is an exposition that could be characteristic
of either the first or third period •. The second part is based
on the last movement of the first quartet. The two subjects
are then combined and there is a chordal ending. The dating
questions involve all the sections oJ~her than the one ~learly

kno\,Tn case--the second subject and its exposition.


The first fugue is particularly beautiful. The subject
uses only four notes. Although it is entir~ly diatonic~ this
narrow vocabulary suggests the third period •. ' It was at that
time that Hovhaness began to write movements l'1ith very few
pitches~ including the three-tone movements of Khaldis and
Flowering Peach. This culminated in the use of only six
tones for the whole of Wind Drum. At any rate, the subject
could ~therwise belong to the first period.
The exposition is scored for divided strings, although
there are only four polyphonic voices. Hovhaness doubles
each voice in the octave. This choice of rich scoring sug-
gests the third period, but does not prove the material
originates there. Hovhaness may simply have .chosen to
Ex. 20
268 '

Ex. 21

..
"

orchestrate an earlier t'llgue ~n -cr-.d.s mr.mne!" ..


The counterpoint is rich i~ expressive suspensions and,
althoubh there are modulations, all progressions between two
consecutive chords are diatonic in some key. This conforms
to first period practice as analyzed in the Mi3sa Brevis dis~

cussed in Chap~e~ v.
In a number of passages the parts move in very similar
rhythms. Whereas this is common for fast musi~ in the first
period, as in the two quartet fugues discussed above, it is
not typical for slower ones where Renaissance practices have
a great influence. There is one particularly fine passage
.
in which there is little rhythmic difference 'between the
voices. Note the first violin part' (doubled by first violas)
which uses unusually fe~l step'\d.se intervals (EX. 22). Al-
though the third movement of the quartet has some similar
looking passages, this is not common' in first period poly-
phonic writing.
The author conjectures, despite the rather scant evi-
dence, that, this fugue was newly composed for this work, in
the 1950's. The four-tone 'subject may indicate the work be-
longs originally to the 1950's. Another reason for this
269

Ex. 22

'fir Ir r Ir p Ij r IrF Ierf 0

conjecture is that the execution or a.double fugue with two


old subject::; '\Ilould be rather difficult unless .they were con-
ceived together. They were not, of course, since the first
subject appears nowhere in the. quartet. Of course, it is
still possible for the first fugue to have been conceived in.
the ..first ·per~9d.. The achievement of the double. fugue would
not have been impossible in Viel'l of the fact that the double
counterpoint uses the first subject in long pe~al-like note
values •
. The second exposition is taken directly from the first
pages of the quartet version. In vie'\ll of the grander deSign
of the movement, the word gaio is replaced by vivo in the
tempo designation. The stl"ing orchestra, of course, is not
as light as the quartet. Hovhaness does not double any of
the parts, so the strings are non-divisi.
After the exposition and some canonic episodes the re-
mainder of the m.ovement alternates between close canonic
strettos either directly from the quartet fugue, or very
similar to it, and slow' statements of the first subject in
the brass again~t the second subject and related material in
the strings. The contrast of speeds and tone colors is quite
270

effective after the second fugue material. The second expo-


'sition serves to build excitement for a powerful contrapuntal
juxtaposition, where in the quartet it was used independently.
The moments where the t,\,10 subjects are juxtaposed p:ce.....
sent the first subject doubled in strings and brass and the
second in one of the other string parts. The remaining
string parts fill out the harmony wit~ occasional references
to either subject. Hovhaness doesn't allow all string parts,
or even more than two of them, to participate in running ma-
terial wlrlle the first subject is sounding. This creates a
-£Urther contrast between the more agitated moments when t~e

first subject is absent but all the string parts are in rapid
strettos, and the more majestic moments when the first sub-
ject is stated dramatically. Ex. 23 is a page of the score
in which this contrast can be observed clearly.
Eventually the brass entries begin to overlap. Finally
the rapid movement of the strings gives way to slower lines,
although tremolos are introduced. At this point there is a
powerful chordal peroration which contains chromatic progres-
sions entirely normal for the third period but impossible in
the first. This begins with the powerful change from A Minor.
to F# Major two bars after cue 28 (see E~. 24). From this
point on, most of the progression is chromatfc.
There seems to be little doubt that the music from the
'onset'of double counterpoint through the end belongs to the
third period. Even'in the event that both fugues derive from
271

Ex. '23. Mysterious' .Mountain

111. - I

...~ ...... e ..

-
- .. ;.. .'

, --.

- .... ... ..
~:

=
T~'s. lI
,f}
,.
r&1
.1

~
-
- ,
(?]] - -
,U.tgM~s§.§~~~
I
III ,
Vns.

~:
n - !El!~' .
~~ -:---.
... ------ ' ....'

--.= ..= ,.
~

- ....,... ~ ~ ......... ---- ---.


--.-
.....---. ..
'.

===
,

- ---=-- • ~.~~
. -.~
A.". . . -r:.-'.~ ..·... _
-- :>--

-- - -
-r-.::..:r
272

Ex •. 24
.
mID-.2-
,
,
-~

~ -
..
=.iT
-
-
( - _t'
.
21).!~..J.
v mF-
-===-IP
--=---- .1--------"-1
F-
""""
.F -
- --=- D

-t-~I
HnS. I
~ r~1L
1I

"-
~
~e

nt~
,
1"'"",-:
..!;::::;:- --
()
= ~c::~ =r

=:::::::::::
-
- ~

,
- .~D .

LL - !::= .

I ;-
.F
z. - I I~I

--------- .F -

i" ... ",Ie.


L~ ~
Vns

.. 11'. ~
i
4~ b",,..
273

Ex. 24 (Continued)

, ;,~~
3
-
- ~. "42 --. J~~
\
-.~ /

F1.. ,"
6
ill
..- ... - t-_
-
- ---- ,...."
-- '--
, tJ-
-0:01. ;a

1.1t!.
"fJ - -
:
--- -'- -
-

W
.I
. - --
.-
-.
.-
.- m-
ltd ~ I I I ]--,
~
r"'- . 1,:--- , -.
HIlS • 3
• "
S
I"

,"
---
...
-- -~

:
J

H
--
I

.-l
I~

Qj
=--
J

.-

~7."
I
i~
.. _ ~t.

a
3
~--
I. ,- I
- I--'"
... ,
I.

~
1-- ':J
~

po-
re rA-
.~

.2
t
---- :::
11Inl - --
3
- ·111.
_0 17~ ~
= 11~
-- ______.=-- V

. -
'Imp
-
: p
..
r.p
- --

II
-
: -.
~ S!: ~ ~ bn A
. _-J::
I
r~'~
VIn, "~~~
.",-- ..
- .. =
iCl':J

::
= .-
I.e

f/; ~..a. n ~ ....


~

r
'- l:

--
1&1 :
a
'a- -
" -
~ ~c
.- ... t:
-
1- ~ t'1
~
I ..::.--
~

--
:

-
~. ;~
-
:
l... ~.. ~
~--==t--c

&I
di •• = I
,.
... -~ -...'!1!-
--.- !1.. fl.... t'1 I
>-1=
.- .,.

~l
..:.:1"....." II,,,, _.. -. ~-a-
-
A

-
274

Ex. 24 (Con~inued)
, ,

g ~ -~--------~----~~-~~
,~~
,fJ ft.. ;;' "A"

I'll,
,.
10

1'6 , - 0'

-~ ~. I:~:-=

III~ .6 iH
~
I
I
.
1'6 .6 1-.., \' ,
'r :':rJJ. "
1:1

,,' 1
I';, 6
I:l\
Cli. I

2tl~~ .- ~
-

-
aCL
I" 1 P..::?', 1'I.iO' 'lS"
II --"'1:1
Bns. ,. :

'" ~- ~-:-= 1--'~ '

- - 0
- -

-- --- -
-¢#'
:If/

--- --.
,,(J ,..--.= ~I!\
I - .'
Jn
~'

---
H
1:1
Hns_
• ,ju<J":' ;""'W'
I~ D
, . ~

,-- .
..... ., ...
6, __
-
'J'~.

~
..
,..... 1':\
I
a .
~.i7
I I
~
- ±'!:B
6
1:1

II
r;::::: ~.d. 1-..,..
'l;~
.,.1:1
, I

I.
f
m 1:1
"

--
S
Tb,
~-
.U--
IIV :c:i" ~-. .qj"S~~.,
-
-
--
I!\
nmp
-..
,~J=J ~
7IIJ
~ b.p.
_.
l'
_. -,
J
~.
I!\'
A'
-
I
~~ H .fII
I!\

If, U ..
'
--= - - .& . ::
~,
-...
,
j;'~. ...D, ~ ~;.

trt.
[:n .
2

l:tf;
I~
H

H
- - .
Of

Dr
- ~

.... t'l\

V'D. If.. I
.,. ..- - :tU -
t'l\
.
p..,;.) ~ ~
~

;,------:r ...
. .iir -
- .c>' I'!\
Vel.
Cb. ~(! ='
H .J1I
275

the first period, the combination of them in sU;:;h aggressive


·contrast of scoring and tempo would probably not have been
conceived then. And the final progression (Ex, 24), despite
the largely stepwise voice-leading, is characteristic only::;;·
of the third period and thereafter.
276

CHAPTER X

SYMPHONY NO. 8 "ARJUNA, II OPUS 179

Everything about the titling and numbering of this. work


is deceptive. The piece dates from 1947, so a more correct
opus would be about 65 or 70. It was not originally called
a symphony, as it is a concertante work with prominent piano
and timpani parts. The &ymphonic designation, the high num-
ber and the late opus were all assigned when the work first
obtained major performances. This w~s in 1960, in India, and
the locale probably accounts for the subtitle. In the second
._ .... __ ._____period, ..one usually f~nds Armenian subtitle s; Indian one s are
used later. At any rate, the work is from the heart of the
Armenian period and it is an extreme case of that style in a
---number of ways. It is in one unusually long movement--25
minutes in duration according to.:> the score. Tne work is eri-
~irely non-harmonic. The rhythmic drive, either of percus-
sive sixteenth-notes, or relentless duple meters is never in-
·-terrupted.The scoring does not exploit the possibilities of
the instruments much at all, and there is a prevailing full
·sonority, with few breaks.
The work is almost continuous; there are few cadences
and instrumental parts overlap wherever sectional breaks
might other~ise appear. However, it is possible to divide
the work into three sub-sections, more by sonority then any-
thing else. These are:
277

1 •. The opening secti01:: involving a contrapuntal


1ncipit for orchestra alternating with extend-
ed rapid cadenzas for solo piano, followed by
an extended passage with absolutely no contra-
puntal feeling for the whole ensemble. There
1s a two-part episode at the end of the section.
2. From cue 23 to just before cue 34; the section
1s marked "bird-like," and uses much lighter
texture.
3. From cue 34 to the end; there is a change of
key.~~g~aturs and of tempo at 34, but the ~
meter is retained. The full orchestral tex-
ture resu_mes at 34, and is retained 'P:retty
much continuously throughout. The section
begins with a contrapuntal passage,. related
to the opening, but gives way to monophonic
writing for most of the remainder. There are
no-elaborate piano cadenzas in this passage.
The structure itself brings up some questions. Why does
Hovhaness intrbduce counterpoint at the opening and.at cue 34
only to frustrate the expectation or more polyphony in both
sections? What is the reason for the solo pi~no cadenzas so
near the beginning and at such length?
The ensemble inc~udes flute, English horn (no oboe)~

clarinet, bassoon, French horn~ timpani, solo piano, and


strings. The instruments have certain distinct roles. The
278

solo piano always plays rapid sixteenth-notes, sometimes in-


volving repeated and drone notes. The timpani are always
tuned to th~ interval of a fourth. They always have quick
writing,' in cycles, with cross-rhythmic effects relativE tcf'
the other parts. The specific cycles, their length, and the
relative amounts of time taken by rests and notes change
throughout. The horn sometimes joins the woodwinds in melod-
ic doublings. Most of the time, however, it has very long
held notes, prece.ded by a grace note, or an on-beat eighth
or sixteenth-note. Usually this part is cyclic. The wood~

Winds have melodic material on~y, and often double each other.
There is virtually no distinction between the types of lines
given to the various members of the. group. The strings have
somewhat more variety. They play melodies at various speeds,
light pizzicato accompaniments, and .held notes, sometimes
doubling the horn. 'rhere 1s no "divisi" or multiple stop-
ping aGd no sustaining of chords. Hovhaness does not give
them any rhythmless music either, preferring to keep the mea-
sured rhythmic-metric drive of the work entirely intacto
~he ensuing excerpts illustrate some of the typical in-
strumental roles.

Ex. 1. Piano
,. •. _~~I~ r- :~ ~ (J. ~ r~
!)r -!'P n~9,
:'.' "t 'J
~ t.=;· -'.~:.'~!;:l .,...
'A
~ - . " ':-J:"~ ,. -
I
'111 I f"J -~
..............
~
...
.;...~<4iJ I
""11
...
279

Ex. 2. Timpani

Ex. 3. Horn

Section 1
The work opens with a fu.lly scored two voice canon at
the octave, at one bar's distance. The horn and violas have
a tonic drone, (B), from the outset and the timpani enter in
the 10th measu~e with a long cycle (p3 sixteenth-notes).
'From this p.oint on, however, the texture quickly thins'out~

The canon gives way to a simple orchestral unison passage,


and then the majority of the orchestra breaks off leaving
only bassoons and low strings. The piano solo then begins
its first cadenza. This passage is quoted below (EX. 4).
Hovhaness introduces repeated quick notes at the outset and
these recur to emphasize melodic stresses. The only notes
that are repeated in this way are B,E and F#, the root,
fourth and. fifth of the mode. The melodic writing is pre'-
dominantly stepwise and the range is narrow. For the first
several lines the range is one octave, and there are no
accidentals. On the bottom of the first page of the example;
280

Ex. 4

I
1

!
.j

I
If
i
1

Pt. "'"
:
! i' -~ ~.+~
281

..
9

T '.,.. T .,.
221
;r
282

, ,

Hovhaness introduces'G#. It is treated as a lowe,r neighbor


to A and thus there is a small passage of,melo~ic arabasque
emphasizing these two notes (at x). But Hovhaness wants
only a. new melodic interest, not a,4'modal change, so the line
ends with a repeated F#, preceded by a grace~note B. Further
interest is created in the next line where E# is added, and
the G# is cancelled, so the F# has chromatic neighbors on
either side. The next few lines are diatonic, and still in
the same octave range. At y, typically exotic augmented sec-
ond writing appears. This triggers a new melodic figure--the,
upward quintuplet sweep at zl' which in turn leads to the
septuplet at z2. Just after z2 the line reaches its high
point, D, only a third higher than the octave range hereto-
fore in use. But the long dwelling on such low range, and
the building excitement at x, y and zl and z2 cause the high
D to be quite effective. After the D the part proceeds down-
ward again, ending on the low B.
The orchestra takes over w~th a passage of unison melody,
with timpani cycles and French horn pedal notes. The orches-
tral line makes some use of the piano cadenza material, al-
though it is largely slower; eighths instead of sixteenths
..predominate. The piano then has its second cadenza, the ,
major part of which is quoted below (EX. 5). The tessitura
is ~gher than the first cadenza, but also wider. This pas-
sage is rhythmically int'eresting due to the move insistent
use of sixteenth-notes and the use' of passage's that strongly
283

Ex. 5

i
I
i
~,
'I
it

II
,~
- ' # ...

,i
..,
I

,.
284

Ex. ~ (Continued) .

. I

Pi".
L
r't
f
,
t
J
..
f

i
i

f.
i
r
i
r
I
~
r
~'-. .i!

~
J.
:
t
r
(
".

~"'i .•
.f'

impart a metric. feeling~ within the senza misura design. At


a~ . tor example~ the composer write's what amounts to ordinary
~ rhythm" which is gradually quickened starting at b" so that
the "firSt beat" B comes in atter·'shorter intervals each time"
giving the eftect of' an accelerando. This builds suff'icient
tension for Hovhaness to employ a dramatic nine-note grouping
obviously based on the passages marked z in Ex. 4, leading to
a surprising and eff'ective accidental-~F~ .~ the f'lattened
(Locrian) f'if'th degree. This note is the highest point of'
,the line. On the next page, all the notes fall into four-
'note groupings, and the sound is q~te' metric.-The low B·
drone adds to the insistence of' the passage. This texture
continues as the line gradually proceeds downward.
The pattern noted in the piano cadenza also pervades
the work as a whole--namely that the "lri ting becomes more
'four-square, and rhythmically regular as the passageprogres-
sese This causes increasing drive' and directness, along
with a gradual transition towards simplicity.
Thus far, the piano and orchestra have not been heard
together. The section continues with one more orchestral
passage, like the others but longer, during which the piano
. is again silen"C. In the ensuing two sections, however, the
orchestra and piano are always,heard in combination; there
are f'ew passages where the piano is silent" and absolutely
none where the piano i~ entirely unaccompanied.
One possible reason for this design might be that
286

Hovhaness considers the final section's the core of .the piece,


, ,

ana that thi~ opening has been something of a stylized pre-


sentation of the protagonists--including the instrumenta,l
forces and the melodic idiom and rhythmic design~ The use
of counterpoint may fit . in with tlll.s plan as a rich proclama':'
tion, not unlike the invocations at the beginnings of Greek
plays in emotional effect.

Section 2
The passage is marked "bird-like" and uses only piano,
solo violin, English horn and orchestral second violins~

'The latter pl~y pnly one note throughout--a he1.d B, which


the piano also has as the first note of each half-bar in its
part. The solo' violin has a melody which is doubl~d by the
piano at the unison. The English horn part is also melodic;
it consists f')f phrases of moderate length interspersed 'in th
long rests. The piano plays continuous quick notes. The
resulting texture continues without much variety for the
-whole section. An extract follows (Ex. 6).
The main melodic line (solo violin) has few cadences,
and the phrases are of unequal lengths. The entire 'lengthy
line has a range of only one octave. It begins with a
quarter-note passage with a repeated note, but the remainder
is more florid. This opening (Ex. 7) influences the English
horn'part which begins, each successive entrance with Ex. 8.
Its part, however, largely continues with quarter-notes.
287

Ex • . 6

S8

Pro

~f~:~~~~'~~"~'~~~~;~-l~~~~~·~~
%.JII~~-
288

Ex. 6 (Continued) "

EH.
~';i\
I
~

P
- ·59

..tAr..,..Jl.A .1~ I.
-----
r rr,
Jr .~~ 4!~ ..
':.""

r~~ ~r:,i II".1 ~r",..J~.~ ,..1 "'"r,('- . ~


t==I
Pt.
,...
~
m_'n"1 (Il --" ~
" ,. W=----=--F9i
nl m.;:w..
I"'
"
IA..
Vn.
Solo ... - --....:~ ....r.

.
·~.n
."~~,
I;~ J
....

p I

I. ~4!~,II,.. I ~"'" ~9- ~

r.-t'-'.!~_ .. _... _..... _. __ ......• _ _ ._ .. ___ . ____ - - .


289 '

Ex. 8
~ ,

,--Although. :t~e passage is very ,static" there is some sense


of dramatic development., The higher range of the violin is
used only in the latter part of the section. As, in the piano
cadenza" Hovhaness carefully prepares and exploits the intro-
duction of the few accidentals with subtle melodic writing.

,
The advent of G# for example, leads to this'line at cue 30:

~ Ex. 9

The English horn plays F natural near the end of the


section, soon after a G# in the fiddle" creating the only
chromatic suggestion in the passage. This F is the only
forte note in the section. The approach ~o it is by the
material used for all the English horn phrases, with a
minimum of additional notes (EX. 10).
290

Ex. 10

"
,.
_,' I

. Pr,

1\ ....

Vu. ~, ;1:'
Sc!D 1;=
'-. ·-.vn.n ~~§~'~§§~$§§~~§~§~~~~~§§§j
..... "1

. '

EH~
r ~~ :~~, ;'. 1'...
k . .-.
,';:=., , -.....=->"""-:::
=:.: => .• ~.=

J~~ :
I

i'r:--= ". p1'


T .....
~-
.
Pro
'~L :rJ I~r~i LS= ~i Irr'I'J
-
Irrr
~t==t"4 .~ -~ ~rt".

,~~ :J~ ~
f. Ir i'" I"

·--VI1.
Sclo ".
.,.,;::: to ::';;:I ::I;;
;::-::.... .;;--.. ----..
"
-- ~~.
.. "'
-';;l::

,
Ii"'

l~....., -==-
Vll.n ;.":,!",, ~
""l I I I I I .
291

Ex. 10 (Continued)·

.,
l

61
I
f

\j
I
, ,I
I
I
I
292

Section 3
The last section, considerably the longes.t, begins with
an apparent reprise of the opening two-part canon" but it is
faster, in a new key, and only illusory" in that the parts
soon become free. The counterpoint breaks off altogether
with the entrance of the piano. After· this pOint the ensem-
ble plays essentially as one unit, and the me~odies take on
more and more periodic nature. How~ver" cross-rhythms are
always present" provided by the timpani, by pizzicato strings
and by occasional entrances of the solo flute. Remarkably, .
-- - -.. ---throughout almost the -entire --section the French horn is con-
fined to the role of sustaining one drone E. (The' question
of physical or mental fatigue for this player might be an in-
teresting one 1)
Several of the melodies open with an upward second con-
stituting 7-8-8 of the mode, as in Exs. 7, 8. The piano's
first entrance in this section i~ Ex. 11. ·Orchestral lines

Ex. 11

at cues 47 and 54 are Exs. 12 and 13.


. Ex. 14 i~ a prominent melodic burst for low strings
fortissimo which occurs very near ~he·end.anq takes over
the entire orchestra at the conclusion of the work.
293 '

.',

, '

___ ~x.. ::L4

• I

@f !t~ Yn~9i~9Y$ ~9nf9~ty to the meter and its 7-8-8


-··!llpt~v~ w~tn ·~ts ~epetit;t9n of the tonic note. The last melo-
~y !~ ~D~ m9~t ~~~~~S$~V~~ pee~use the tonic is repeated five
~im~~j ~~ ~P]?~'~;r:'s ~t the ve~y end of the piece, enhancing
the cont~nuing ~rowth of intensity. '
~s usual, important modal degrees are strengthened by
m~~99~9 $~]?S, Most or the skips used are to or from the
to~c, with the fourt~ or fifth degree as the other note.
4~ ~~l~n~Q ~n Cha~ter ,lll, the fourth is usually important
~p ~p~ A~mE?nian ~e;r~od. Jllst before cue 43 of Arjuna,
294

:JloYbane£.s e~J.oy.s this mannerism clearly (Ex. 15).


:Although the J.ast section is, quite continuous, we may
"
D-lilti,nguish between two basic textures. First, there a.re
full tutti, where the piano may nave rests, deco~ation or
(ail at the end) doubling of the orchestra. Second" there
are also lightly scored passages, with prominent piano and
light accompaniment, often involving pizzicato strings.
The$e two layouts alternate. Timpani cycles appear in both.
Except for the use of the repeated tonic in Exs. 11-14
and the use of mor~ doublings in scoring, Hovhaness really
---~s not--bui~d.eumulatively'1n,-this section. It is largely
~tatic~ For this reason, the remainder of this chapter will
concern texture'in the section as a whole.
Ex. 16, just before and after cue 42, is about midway
in the section. The timpani are assigned a cycle of 27
e1~ht~-notes which has internal implica~ions o£ ~ meter.
~he melody in the violins is anchored by the E's, in the
first and' fifth bars. The 'firs t bar after 42 is an answer
__to ~helT!' as it has two equally strong BIS, with the added
lower neighbor. The violas have a dominant pedal, which is
amplified by E in the second violins after the fourth bar.
The music does not require any emphasis on E in the accom-
paniments before that pOint, as the note is so prominent in
the ~elody.' However, ,afterwards' the line might suggest a
transition to B Minor, so Hov?aness e~loys the held E to
~void that impression. Tr~s also explain~ the movement of
295


1
.'
ft~r~·§~§F·§·~§~§-~~¥~~~§~~.~:;:~.~i~~;;;~~~~¥~
EH. ~~.--- . - -.~.. - ~
ttl .- "-+-
296

Ex. 15 (Continaed)
. "
,
,.,,
:
: I
,I
'\
I

,;>'

I~

II
~

. ...
--.-..:
' -, ..
'~ ~--­

~_~, __ ~~~ _____________________________________ J


. ~:.

I
. I
I
I

.:. i
f'
I

,, ,
J

"
, :

P1. lb.
~_.

"~I I~~;" -
yt..
- .-....-.::;;:- -- ,. . . , ~
II" . ..-:::p..
-

... "\il.1I l~)=-=-LJ ~ ,~ I .


liol _ : . . •• " _ _ . ---c-:3:::~ t I
-I, I
~-

..
298

Ex. 16 (Continued.)

·
.11...
10/
r"'iA
'" A
- ,- --
.
EH. ~' ,
I"'

"-
Cl
f. 0/ .,

.A

· ~
)= p
,...., ....., f!!!
....., -
''limp l

· ..... ...
_fl ..
, PI.. ",
"<I

CM Il,!l ;:;-;,.!!.
. /J
.r-.. ! ,~~
-
~ . -
~.r~
~-
~

,.~~~
- -
,

-
Ii"
d
'i':''~....
.....01 .

~ ........
~- ~ --:;,: ¥ -.,;:
'\i . ~, .~"

I I - I I
1-1
II .
-.
,~ I .. ~~

I ~ . ~ ~ I. ~.. A ~ ~ .. ~ ~
• If'-
" -
299

the horn tl'Qi'Jl Eto E midway through the excerpt. The flute
--at cue 42 has a. unique role. It plays triplets in high tes-
.0

aitura a.s an a.dded coior to orchestral passages •. It creates


three-against-two and four-against-three situations, and
aomet1mt;:s a.dds dissonance, but it is .~lways a very smooth
line emphasizing, Or at least ending on E, A or B. The in-
terpolations are always quite brief. In view of the promin-
ent range, the passages add a brightening effect. No other
instrument in the ensemble ever plays this music, or anything
. resembling it, a.ha it is probably the C?nly instance in the
... -··-workwhere a pa.rticular woodwind p~rt has an individual pro-
file. ~he pizzicato double bass part is actually a remnant
of the st~le Of accompaniment used for pi~no solos in this
section, so discussion of it will be suspended as it is ade-
quately e~laineu in the ensuing paragraphs.
. .
tXt 17 occurs sOOn atter cue 4j. The piano solo is in
~ with·relentless sixteenth-note motion. The scoring and
the ca.reful·oindication Of stems clarifies the melody. The
left hand has only the tonic and dominant, and the melody,
like Ex, 15, emphasizes the fourth degree. The timpani part·
is in a cycle Of~. The strings are also in ~, in ~ very
regular tala, which is obsc~red somewhat by inconsistent use
of rests. The tala is the imp~rtant signature ~ design
found in several works. In this case it appears as JJ m
or l;tJ ~ , /., in al~ernate cases. The long notes, by the
Way, all are either B'a or E's, adding to the modal clarity.
300

Ex. 17

"..,"

.'~
301

Ex. 17 (Continued)

:.

'~-.
Pf. ~01 !::::J ~
~~ IT
- D
, - 1 I
;oI'taA~
.A'-- .... I~
%.1 1';;':0=1 '

"
302

Although the scoring is fairly· .light , and entirely l'li th-


out "sostenuto" charac·ter, it is not quiet.~he pj,.ano is
marked !, with th~ other parts~. This is fairly typical
of the entire section. It is not . .··clear whether the str:i.ngs
represent a textural element or a. true counterpoint. The
use of four lines in four octaves certainly suggests the
line is to be taken seriously. This is enhanced by the clear
periodicity of the line and its tendency to confirm Band E.
Moreover, several segments of the w~rk use the same ~ tala
-in the same scoring. On the other: hand, the pizzicato indi-.
cation and th~.mezzo-forte marking both suggest that it is
subservient to the soloist.
Arjuna is an extreme work in its length and static qual-
ity, but it differs from other works in this period only in
its extent. Most of the allegros of the per~od, even includ-
ing contrapuntal ones, are not climactic, and make their
point by subtle melodic and textural variation ·l'lithin a basic
layout •. The careful choice of these subtle variations, and
the basic modal and rhythmic idioms may seem rather thin to
many hearers; especially in this very long work. It is im-
portant to realize that this might riot be said about other
.. works l'There more changes of style occur, and where harmony
and counterpoint contribute to the effect, not to mention
climatic rhythmlesseffects or other developments through
scoring. In this regard, Arjuna may be the most extreme ex-
ample of a major work of a basic Hovhaness tyPe--a large work
303
'.

ot very economical means.· At any rate,· to listeners who are


sensitive to its basic sound and small changes in articula-
tion, Arjuna can be a hypnotic listening experience"

., .
.~ :..~.

.'~
304

CHAPTER XI

THE FLOWERING PEACH SUITE, OPUS 125

The Flowering Peach Suite is derived from incidental


music written fo~ Clifford Odets's play of the same name. It,
is scored for:a small but colorful ensemble; The essential
melodic material is played by an alto saxophoni'st, occasional-
ly doubling clarinet. The harmonies are presented by harp or
piano; harp is preferred but piano is indicated as an alter-
native!. One percussion player handles 'vibraphone, glocken-
,-

spiel and celesta, while a second p'ercussioru.st is assigned


a tamtam, and, only twice in the piece, a pair of timpani.
Ode~sts play is a serio-comic approach to the Noah leg-
endQ The play originally ran at the Belasco Theatre in New
,York during the winter season 'of 1954-1955. ,Hovhaness wrote
music for several scenes to represent special effects or to
accompany action, such as the building of the ark or the ap-
pearance of the rainbow. The full-length play originally in-
cluded taped'sounds to represent "Voice or Presence of God,"
and "a Mouse," but these do not appear in the suite under
consideration.
The music has an appropriate' color and delicacy.
Hovhaness even refers to one section as humorous, although
that seem~ disputable (see Appendix, Item 2). At any rate,
the choice of such a small and colorful ensemble, and the
presence of brief atmospheric movements may derive from the
305

initial practical function of the musi~ as theatre background •


..There are seven movements. Some are. double movements,
. .
joined together either by an attacca indication or by some
continUing (possibly cyclic) part straddling the two segments.

Movement 1: Overture
The form is ternary; senza mi'sura cadenzas for the saxo-
phone constitute the outer section~., '!d th an aria in ~ in the.
middle, using the saxophone in simple melodic writing. The
brie~ initial senza misura is a long arabesque around C, the
fifth of the mode. The tonic F occu~s ·only at the outset.
After the first three notes, the entire passage has the un-
usually short range of a fourth. Rapid groupings include
three~four- and five-note sets. There are repeated groupings,
but not repeated notes. The vibrap~one accompaniment, con-
.- - -"'--sisting of five notes, :reatures-desc~nding perfect fourths,
and is often quite remote.from the harmordc realm of the saxo-
phone. In the rest of the work the vibraphone has cyclic ma-
terial making much use of descen~ing fourths in remote keys.
-In this case the last note is the final of the mode, and the
first note, A, is its major third (although the. saxophone is
in the minor). One other unusual feature is that the vibra-
phone is instructed not to play in strict time with the saxo-
phone.· This ha.ppens.nowhere else in the'work, and it is dif-
ficult to determine why Hovhaness chose such an instruction
-here~ Possibly he wanted to insure a free and rhapsodic
exec'ution of the opening saxophone solo, unenc~oered by
306

.coordination difficulties:
... .- .
- .

. . Ex. 1

.The next section is an aria, in some respects similar


to those of the slow movements of the second period. The
vibraphone, in a cycle of 17 beats, has the same notes as in
its accompaniment for Ex. 1, adding' light coloristic disson-
. -
ance. The harp's har.monization is triad~c in spirit, although
most of the chords are thicker, comprising five-note half-
scales:

Ex •. 2

The effect is not very dissonant, and the har.monic iden-


tities are clear for a number of reasons. The root of the
.._-- chord is in the bass, an octave away from the other notes,
which are grouped close.1y. The harp sonority mitigates
against perception of the dissonance. Moreover, the chords
307

are a~eggiated~ so the non-harmonic notes are heard as rapid


passing tones.
Although the key is F minor, the progression is modal
rather than tonal. Most root movements' are stepwise. The
opening would be analyzed: I-VII-VI-V-IV in
, . tonal terms.
The voicing is all in parallels. The last two phrases end
with Tierces de Picardie. The aria line, as usual~ h~~ ~

fairly narrow range. The uppermost'note is struck exactly


once, just about midway through the piece. Stepwise motion
,:pr~dcminates, and some of the ph,:rases begin with repeated
---quarter-notes. More subtly, certai~ idioms. recur from the
opening cadenza, which is the melodic, germ of much of the
work. Several phrases or bars outline the ascending fifth--
akin to the opening of Ex. 1. The ending of'Ex. l--three
descending scale notes followed by a: turn upward to the last
note~ recurs either exactly or in the Landini-like variation
shown in Ex. 3.

Ex. 3 ,,~

This occurs at the ends of most phrases of the aria.


-The conclusion of the movement is a development of the
opening cadenza. The s~xophone dwells at first on the open-
i'ngF-C rise, then goes on to the F above--filling out the
308

octave, and closes by turning downward,aga~n. The greater


~ength and range is matched by a more urgent accon~animent-­

peda.l F's, reiterate.d without harmoni~ complexities by vibra-


phone and harp. Where the opening included one initial tam-
ta.m stroke} this pa.ssage uses a cycle .. of l3=beats (of the
aria.' s tempo) for the tamtam, although the other :tustl'U.!llents .
are senza misura.

Movement 2: Lifting of Voices;


Building the Ark
This is a double movement, indicated as stich in the score
-- with the headings "2alf and "2b" and. the two titles.. The first
part is an aria in the style of the middle section of the over-
ture. Although there is no actual melodic. reference to that
movement, there are many similarities. The harp provides the
sa.me arpeggiated five-note chords for accompardment and in-
cludes more' stepwise and mediant movements than tonal ones.
The melody is in a Simila~ ~ meter with repeated notes, much
stepwise motion, and exactly the same melodic range (with
the .high note stated exactly once, in the middle). The
phrase endings use the same pattern of three stepwise des~end­

iog notes and a turn upwards into the final note. There are
no cyclic parts and the only empl~yment of percussion occurs
as a brief interlude in ~ for solo vibraphone, in a style
familiar in Hovhaness's writing for tuned percussion and
. piano using the fifth degree as a drone.
309

Ex. 4

The Building the Ark section is one 0;' the two parts of·
th6 pfece where the timpani are used, and one of the two where
the harp is silent. It is also the only really fast music in
the whole work. Timpani are heard on every beat, in regular
,quarter-notes, but the pitches create ~ cycle of seven using
only F and C. The ,ribraphone plays, every half-note, but in
a cycle of 12--in fact the part uses all'12 tones, exactly
once each. The cycle includes a number o~ descending perfect
fourths and fifths, and it recalls the vibraphone writing of
the first movement. The saxophone part is the most interest-
-ing of all., Except for a Gb, notated Eb in Ex. 5, three bars
before·the end, the whole movement uses only three notes,
which amount to the root and major and minor thirds of the
mode. The entire writing develops from the first phrase and
the principle of mixing threes and fours. The second phrase-
1s identical to the first. The third phrase eX'Pands the
first by extending its second measure. The next phrase is
just a set of statements of the opening four notes, once
every thre~ eighth-notes (in ~ meter). The next phrase be-
gins like the first bu~ uses an extension based on the open-
ingof the line, in augmentation. The ending of this phrase
310

Ex. 5·
..
Allegro (J. 120) . . ..... ',

..
.
. E'Aito
, ...sax.ophone tI .... ,WI :::
" ..A ,- Motor on·
'tl , .fHolt! Peaal fill the ehd of the mouerflenl.
Timpani
.F.C
(gJ
fV . " .
Allegro (J -120) '~ ~' '
.. Ii , ,

.' .
..'. H',

~~.>:t;·
...' ; . ' ' •••

r~
. ': Harp
~
~.~. .:
or :': . .~.'. "

;;;:;;
Piano
r
.. .... ~

. ,
j .I I J j ,I'd J I .I
j I .1 J I j .E I J j I ,I •I
..

'. -..~~~~~j~~~~~=~~~~"'-...l~J~~~~~~$~~§~~~~~~~~
..... "

. "
..
,;

" .'
3li

l.eads to the next, which includes a passage of running six-


'teenth-notes syncopated by the reiteration ofa three-note
grouping. NeJtt, a b,rief unit is repe~te,d once every five
eighth-notes, followed by an unsyncopated statement of the
opening four notes repeated four time~, and then a two-note
grouping repeated every thr~e eighth-notes. The end, with
the added Gb, and the slower motion, is appropriate as a con-
clusion. Hovhaness does, however, provide two quick notes in
the last bar, and does not allow the percussion cycles to re-
'lent, so the effect of climax is fa~rly slight.

Movement 3: Intermezzo
This movement uses vibraphone in a 12-note cycle, with
notes occurring every seven eighth-notes, in gtime. So the
whole cycle is 10 1/2 bars long. The harmony is entirely
,static; - the harp has a simple pattern on the four notes C-Db-
F-Gb. The saxophone melody is notable for its juxtaposition
of diatoniC and more Eastern modal situations. The second
and third phrases illustrate this:

Ex. 6

In the middle section, the wind part is silent. The


tamtam, in a cycle of 17 beats, accompanies a melody in F
312

Phrygian (occasionally with G~ ) played on the glockenspiel.


The harp has a cycle of five half-notes, also in F Phrygian.
In the last part of the movement, the middle section music
continues"'as accompaniment to the melodic line of the firs'l;
part, which is now played by clarinet. The vertical struc-
ture is often dissonant, but this is moderated by the light
sJ~~·j'rities, by the presence of the fifth of the mode (e) as
a prominent drone note in the glockenspiel and by the low F
octave at regular intervals in the harp cycle. Here is an
·extract: J'

Ex. 7

b~
,n L
"'. ....
't... "tD.....l.-,
W
A
I ,I I I t)
I V
.. """ -.a
- ._- ..-.--. _.. -- ---_.. - - -- .. .. -. --. .. - -- - ---

..
. - ~.---

'kl,1 -
...
II
'W,
17 . .
..
~
J'J D D
I'"
U a IIJ -
,.. H O D AR~I!

-'"'" ~

.. - .. __ .. --- -, -.'_. --.!. --


~
•17 '.fL.
n
... , .. - I

" 0
'"
H4rfJ .. --- ----
".
- .. • .
~
1, I
.-J
'""'1
I

- r V .V

e 1. QI
.1
313

Movement 4: Rain
Depicting the great deluge of the Noah story, this move-
ment is a study in tone-painting, and provides an interesting
comparison with all the Romantic storm music of musical }dS~

tory. The movement is brief, and, save one introductory bar


and a two measure conclusion, the whole section is repeated.
The harp, using two strings tuned enharmonically, plays a
regular eighth-note ostinato on one tone (Bb), throughout,
in the left hand.' The ~ight hand has a cycle of five whole-
notes in harmonics; it is largely chromatic to the Bb mode.,
-'1'he-glockenspiel also plays regular eighth-notes,including
the Bb as a drone, although Hovhaness more normally would
have employed F, the fifth degree. -The glockenspiel's melody I

is in Bb Minor, and use~ a very narrow range. It eventually


~ecays into several rests punctuated by short interpolations:

Ex. 8

_.'

When the glockenspiel has its, rests, the harp has an ominous
c~escendo-decrescendo--the rest of the part is all pianissimo--
which is rather hypnotic in view of the repeated enharmonic
ostinato bass. The only other music is for timpani--its sec-
ond and last use in the work. Every 6 1/2 bars it plays a
simple bit of music,- mezzo-piano, noteworthy for its
314

employment of the third of the mode, where Hovhaness normally


would use the fifth:

Ex. 9

Movement 5: Love Song


Hovhaness returns to the arpeggiated harp chords of the
-first movements, although there are. now only two chords em-
ployed alternatively and they are of a diff~rent structure.
One is a chord of F Major-Minor; the other is A Flat Major
with an added ninth (Ebb). The chords have three common
tones. Both are stated-_ in ~ ~osition l'lith the fifth doubled.
----The clarinet has a slow melody in very low register. Inter-
valli cally it resembles the earlier arias,bu:t the rhythm is
slol'Ter -and less regular. The vibraphone -has a cycle of 19
~eats, containing only five notes with several descending
__per~ectfourths, clearly_resembling the vibraphone ~arts of
earlier sections.

Movement 6: Bun and Moon


This movemen~ begins with a clear modal melody in ~ in
- G Dorian. The vibraphone plays it with G as a drone note.
The tamtam plays in a cycle of 6 1/2 bars. The second por-
tion of the movement uses clarinet solo, in range-and mood-
similar to the fifth movement, with cyclic accompaniment in
315

the vibraphone (playing G~ ) and the. harp (playing note.s


-.~a.rgely foreign to the -mode) • The movement is entirely quiet
and without cilmax. As such it may be appropriate to the
astronomical suggest~.ons of the title~ which imply eternal
orbiting patterns.

Movement 7: Rainbow Hymn


Thus far one can observe a transition from_slightly
heavier~ harmor~c~ aria-like music~ in the opening sections~

tl ' -ugh non-harmonic music with harp drone patterns (the third

aLJ. fourth iiiovements)~ to the very sparse texture of the fifth


and sixth movements~ where there is~tittie real harmony and
very light texture. This may represent an emotional transi-
tion to·..re.rds greater and greater mystery.' 'At any rate~ the
final double movement brings this matter into focus, and pro-
-vides a resolution.
The first section of this movement is slow and very
sparse~ an extreme instance of cyclic treatment, as all parts
are cyclic. It is the most diffuse~ least triadic part of
. the piece. The second part~ the actual nymn, is the most
consonant section of the work and even comes close to being
tonal. Some instruments have cycles throughout the whole
movement. The celesta plays a cyc·lic pattern in the first
half and continues into the beginning'of the second, provid-
ing the effect of overlap.
In the first half," the tamtam plays one !l0teevery 6l!2
bars' (~). The celesta, playing exactly one note per bar, has
316

a cycie of 12 bars; in terms of pitch~ it is a l2-tone line.


As scored it is very rich in skips, particularly those which
outline dissonant in"tervals. No three cons'ecuti ve tones out-
."
line. any major or minor triad, and the entire line is unique,
even among Hovhaness's l2-note cycles, in that it seems like
a workable pattern for atonal row treatment. Ex. 25 of Chap-
ter IV gives the opening 12 bars of the movemen~, comprising
exactly one celesta cycle. The harp is in a cycle of seven
bars, changing the pattern in the middle of the section: but
maintaining' the seven-bar·period. In both passages, G is the
modal center; the first pattern uses only G and D,-' where the
second uses a five-note modal range. 'The two patterns are:

EA. lOa

Ex. lOb

The insistence of these cyclic patterns, with completely


,statiC dynamics, lends a.motionless quality to the mUSic, but
the harmonic coinciqence of the cyclic parts. achieves unex-
pected consonances, quite strategically, near the end of the
317

passage, just before the mood change to the "rainbow h,.ymn."


'~he main body of the section 1s not overly dissonant--it
could not be 1n view of the sparseness of notes, but the num-
ber of consonances, in particular unisons,'1ncreases greatly
near the end~ Further, the celesta cycle continues during
the transition into the hynul, and. even through the beginnd.ng
of it, and the pitches involved are quite interesting ~here

too.
The last twopages.of the movement are quoted below
(Ex. 11). The harp cycles cease at X, and the saxophone aria
begins at Y so I consider X the transition, and Y ,the begin-
ning of the hymn portion of the movement. Two bars before W,
note the brief unison E, which has been preceded by an A
Minor, triad. This begi~s the infusion of consonance into the
lament-like passage. At W, Hovhaness has a strong octave G,
and two bars later, a unison D. A unison E occurs four bars
before X and two bars before X there is another strong G.
Finally, at X, the vibraphone has a D, a chord tone relative
to the harp's GMinor, and for the next several bars most of
the notes are either consonant or harmonically consistent
with the harp chords in some 'other way. For instance, the
Db one bar'after X, would be a seventh based on the Eb Major
triad. The ens·uihg B provides a major third relative to the
harp's minor triad. The Bb is entirely consonant in the next
bar, and the F two bars befo~e Y is another seventh relative
to the harp chord. 'Most interesting is the Gb just before
318

i(~~::::~::~'~P~'::~~-~;';;;;::~~
~ ,....--..,'
~~~~"~=
Up. ,-r;- "'n.
or . '"
o;-{u L_ I . '

Pno' .
... "! _._, _..,. ......... - c • . :(~

. J .. ~,..!UrI ... ' - ::l


r~~;;==:::t-y;...-"~ ~
-C)-'
'-' .. '- ...~."
. _ . '- .: :: , . Ui rJ·

.. R

:. '.;~.

. .
....
~ ~.

"- <.
In 1-0
A.
I Ii
I" Ilie I
- =----=
p.

'. _.-..J-.L--::==
" , ,:"

.to' ,00 . :----'


Alto ~
~-

SaJ.
II
- - -
,(Eb)
eel.
orVib. ~
"
I..-D-.-. -~
>-
.~
- -
~.
- -
.

Tamt
-if _

'-
(Ped.)_
-.
-,...
, I - --. -

I
'.'
319

Ex., 11 (Continued)
." ..." : ..... ,

rz'
~ .......... ........ .
. ",' .... '
,.. .
. .:.
:--.--'
.:' 1: ,

::-.~)~~' fI Jl~'- .... p.~~ ~~--:--+-""--------.,....-~ ",' ~

.' ~f) .,
. :.
. ' . fI ~- l.u,l1lfl"I' ,,'
". ~
..
...
~~~~~
.. '
.
"·-'-Cel.
orVlb.13 . :1: ....•.. :: . ".:
eI_ffed.), _ __
·,T~t,~~--~~==~~==~~==~,~--~"~p~·~~~'~==~'~~===+~==~'

I II I
(:. ..
I .'.

.~' ,,:
" .......:
,

..

~:e= ::e: ~ tr!fYJ;(?J£E; ..' :.. ' .. IAal· ;, .. :'. ..... ,


. . ~ ':~ ; ,:-.' ,

.• Bp_ ~ , p ~ ~ ~ . ... .. ~. ~..~ . .0,

;;"'{- ell bJ &.U .J Id .J J ..! !~n _~t_ 0&'

I
.-, .:..-?.:.#;,,~:.. ".
"", ..: ..'. ~ .'. .~ .. ,

'. ,

4J'aml' .- I
, ..-.-
,
1':'1
-11
p
"

. ".
, ,'." .
',:: '
f J, I ~
"

'.~ ,. " '1':\


,d
U Q 9
B~ E~
;

'.e. I~.n.

.... -' ", '.' u


'.
320

Y. Although it would seem to createa.m1nor second sonority"


the effect is much more consonant. On the harp" the tied G's
have almost no volum~ when the Gb is l?ounded. Therefore the
effect is that of an uncomplicated D Major chord.
As the hymn begins" at Y, the celesta part becomes ·dis-
sonant agai.n" but with the addition of the s~x6phone" all

sonances are heard as coloristic" and· do not spoil the gen-


eral.upturn of mood. The overlapping only continues long
·enough for the part to end on a con~onance; the next one" in
fact" is the tonic G--which is he~d. laissez~v1brer.

The reason for the caref~l study of the vertical effects


of the cyclic writing around letter X of the score is to de-
monstrate this assertio·n: Hovhaness is capable of careful
control and strategic planning of the harmonic results of
apparently hon-vertical schematic cyclic technique. It is
not claimed here that he .always strives for such harmonic
nuances in these passages--certainly in many there is abso-
._lutely no desire on his part for such things--but merely
that cyclic music can still have harmonic value" motion and
control" . and that, at least in this passage, it does·.
The rainbow hymn is an aria. The tamtam still has a
6 1/2 .bar cycle·" and the melody is for the saxophone, accom-
·panied by harp. Although some of the phrases, including the
last one, end with the .same melodic signature as the earlier
arias, and the range is typically narrow, with few skips and
321

some repea.ted notes, the aria has a di~tinctly different


'-sound from the others in the work. One reason is metric.
3
The.hymn is in 4'
11
wh~re the earlier a~iJ.s were 4 and the

meter of the Love Song movement was variable, and hardly


clear anyway. The harp part is probaqly the most significant
difference. There are no arpeggios, and no added dissonant
notes. Non-harmonic tones occur in the course of consider-
able stepwise voice leading, frequently using parallel thirds
or sixths. However, parallel fifths are avoided. Nearly tra-
'ditional tonal chorale voice leadin~ is. employed. There is
some pedal-note usage~ not entirely.
.
foreign , to Hovhaness,in
view of his love of drones, especially on the dominant, For
instance D is a pedal note sustained in th~ "alto" for six
bars starting at Y. Even more remarkable is one unusually
traditional tonal effect, a German sixth chord, resolving
almost academically to V--although the V is minor and in-
verted.· The chord happens twice, three bars before Aa, and
one bar after Bb. The only possible explanation for this
very' uncharacteristic effect is that~ after the lack of tonal
clarity of the preceding section, and several of the last
few movements, Hovhaness wished to exploit to the greatest
degree possible the effect ~f harmonic security. In any
case, the relevant accidentals (Eb and 0#) are approached by
·step (as well as left by step, although that is traditlonal)
so they can be heard as, non-harmonic tones, possibly helping
to prevent an out-of-place sound.
322
...

Although the German sixth chord may be questioned, the


general effe.ct of the movement is quite strong, bringing, a
return, with doubied.harmonic purity and vocal richness, of'
warmly' human, religious, aria-like sound and consonant modal
harmony. It certainly is appropriate to associate the move-
ment, as the title does, with the ~ainbow, which, in the
Noah stury, signifies the end of the flood and the'return to
life and hope.
Hovhaness also useq this final section, with some alter-
ation, in th~ final part of his Return and Rebuild the Deso-
late Places for trumpet solo wit.h wind orchestra •. There,
also .as the title suggests, this music is used to bring a
positive conclusion to a piece at least partially pre-occupied I

with bleakness. .. '

,.
323

CHAPTER XII

FHA ANGELICO, OPUS 220

This orchestral.work, of 1967, is in one continuous


mvvement. There is one main mode which dom1~ates the greater
part of the music. The thematic material adheres to it and
much of the harmonic background is made up of chords built on
its verticalization:

Ex. 1

I; o lio
o b 0 ~." ,,, ,

It has several interesting properties:


1. The notes of the major triads of F; A, Db
and Gb exactly comprise the mode.
2. The pattern of a minor second and a minor
third, in the same direction, characterizes
many of the melodic possibilities in the
mode. This design is marked where it occurs
in Ex. 2 below.
3. The removal of·Gb and Bb would leave a six-
note scale of alternating minor seconds and
minor thii'ds w-1 th equally st~ong possible
central notes on F, A and Db.
324

4. All the notes in the mode either belong.to or


are one half~step away from the notes: of the'
F Major triad. If any other triad were chosen,
at least one note would be more than one-half
step from all of the triad tones.
5. Hovhaness uses J.i' as the center of the mode •
. This follows logically from 4., as the verti-
cal combinations with F as final conform to
his "constructed" vocabulary: outlined above
(Chapter IV).
6. -The ·two· inflections of G do not occur in ·close
proximity to one another. They act not as two
different notes, but as alternate inflections
for ~ne note~ ~dding variety b~t not chromatic
passages. G~ never occurs.
The main theme, also used in Praise the Lord with
Psaltry and Suite for Piano (Chapter VII, Ex. 8) both other
wise entirely different works, is given below.
The different forms of the motive x are indicated. The
latter segment (all but the first two notes) of phrase 7, is
the same as phrase 1, and the beginning of the repetition
.. (high A) is a.lso the.highest note in the whole theme. This
phrase hardly sounds like repetition as the ear does not
. .
take the third note as' the beginning of anything but as the
middle of the first part' of the phrase.. Only at the end of
the phrase is the reference clear. Hovhaness gains phrase
325

Ex. 2

length variety and melodic subtlety in phrase 6 where the


high F replaces the E of th~ preceding phrase. Instead of
the simple subs·titution of F for E as in Ex. 3, both F and
E are pres~nt; the E acts in passing between F and Db, pro-
viding two overlapping .instances of fi f ;1re x.Hovhaness
could have used the E before as well as after the F, but
· .' 326
-.- .. -.-~

Ex. 3

this would have interfered with the drama of the rise of the
line to the F and would have made the.phrase too symmetrical.
One can capsulize the form by indicating a di\~sion

into four sections:


-1. - Introduction and thematic statement.
2. -. -Canonic developments.
3. Rhythmless .material with further canonic
developments (Climax).
4. Thematic statement and epilogue.
A more precise analysis follows.

Section 1
Second violins and harps immediately establish the mode
by holding a chord made up of its notes. C is the lowest
---note,,--so if the chord is Viewed as an extended F triad, then
t:..
it is in 4 position. Throughout the piece this is the norm.
Three. solo violins playa canon, senza misura, at five
quarter-notes distance at the unison. (All canons throughout
the piece are a 3 and at the unison, the usual interval for
fourth perIod counterpoint.) The canon is exact and no fil-
ler material is added for the parts to end together. The
materIal is florid with various speeds and grouping numbers.
327

The theme's ~irst two phrases act as·a. basic scalic pattern
-~n the manner of a raga. Most other notes are in stepwise
arabesques around them •

. Ex. 4a (Canonic Line)

Ex. 4b (II raga" pattern from theme-Ex. 2)


. - .. _._ .. _- -- .. --

~ +br e e ~.
r
" a! •t
~
g

The ensuing transition consist$ of two chords made up


. entirely of "white notes" and· then ~nother mode-verticaliza-
tion chord (hereafter referred to .as "mode chords II ) . The
white-note chords give relief but, more importantly, prepare
the listener for an important shift of modal vocabulary to .'

foliow somewhat later (sect:..on 3). The theme is then stated--


the first two phrases by harp and then the entire theme by
cellos, always against mode-chords in the violins. These al-
ways omit eith~.!, .Gb or Gil, ·avoidihg the one that contradicts
an inflection in the melody. Sometimes other notes are
omitted, cutting down as far as C-F-G#-A or F Major-Vdnor,
when a more direct biting sound is desired.
328
"

Section_ 2 .
-Tr..e next -part alternates hetd chords for strings with
canons for woodwinds. The first two chordal passages have
mode-chords in the lower strings with essentially diatoU1c
- ' ,

ch~rds in the upper strings, emplOyin~ specifically the


chord formed by adding to a major triad in 46 position, the
second- degree based on that chord, viz:

Ex. ,5

~
,W

(See also Chapter IV, Ex. 12 for discussion of this sonority.)


The third chordal passage, which leads into Section 3
- also uses a white-note-chord as the held chord, but has nO.nor
triads with added seconds instead of the major sonorities
like Ex. 5. This transition also includes one instance of
glissandi in block fashion for all the violins~

The canons are in ~- time and involve no elaboration on


the,main theme material which they employ. They are thus
considerabl~r less ornate than the opening canon (See Ex. 4a .. )
The canons are a 3 and at half a measure's distance, leading
"to many close harmonies including
-
minor seconds and unisons.
,

Of the two canons, the first uses phrases 1-3 in solo wind
--
scoring, where the second uses only phrase 5, with doubled
parts.
",
329

Section 3
The interpolations of white-note music in earlier sec-
tions are justified by the orchestral rhythmless section be-
ginning at cue 10 in the score. The main basis for this se~­

tion is diatonic, there are very few accidentals, and the


modal center is D. The passage is one of the most elaborate
and fantastic by the composer and seems to carry the rhythm-
, -
less technique to quite an extreme. However, it is clear
that the music could hav~ been made to so~nd even wilder if
the passage were more chromatic or if more percussion were
employed. These devices are being retained, in this wo~k,

for the next rhythmless music.


The instruments enter in groups; starting with all the
first violins playing s~~teen different parts. Then all the
second violins, then the violas, and then the cellos enter.
These entrances are all ~, so the he~rer is not aware of
each new block of sound until it gains volume. By contrast,
the basses enter fff, then all the woodwinds, playing differ-
entparts,!. The brass follow, first trombones fff, then
horns fff, and finally trumpets fff, joined at the end by
bass drum and timpani (F) playing simple! rolls. It is
worthwhile to study the individual parts ~ore carefUlly.
The first 'fiddle parts have several glissandi, all up-
ward to high D's or A's. They emphasize D with octave out-
lines such as Ex. 6 which'is found at the beginning of several
of the. lines. Many of the parts have running motion, mostly
330

Ex. 6
.
, .
", .

.....

curving downward after initial rises. Except for tops of


glissandi" no' parts go higher than high E which in every
case occurs as an upper neighbor to two D's. A-number of
parts feature the rhythm m G

The second violins dwell on G and A, many parts opening


with:

Ex. 7
. "

",

Some parts introduce Bb's but it is as,a neighbor note to A


and almost exclusively in descending motion. There is plenty
of running figU~ation but no glissandi, no~ rhythm and few-
". -er-wide skips • These parts add depth and secondary tonal em-
phasis (G, A) without adding congestion or agitation.
The violas enter, some parts suggesting ~ rhythm with
several tonal emphases, including D, F, A and C. There are
many glissandi and Bb's. The cellos, also rich in glissandi,
reconfirm the D emphasis and use no Bb's. They add the
rhythmic figure ~. The basses introduce tremolos and
continue some of the rhythms suggested before, such as the
.331

g of the violas. They also confirm D as modal center.


The massed woodwind entry emphasizes G, although the
flute parts deal with the notes:

Ex. 8

which reinforce D, especially with the low string power on


that note.
The trombones enter and their parts consist entirely
-. .
of ,

glissandi. All of these begin on some " white-n<;>te" and most


end on DIs. Each part quickens and uses lower range and
narrower glissandi as ~he music goes on; the opening of the
passage features the three trombones simultaneously playing
.wide, slow, high glissandi, "like a loud smear" in the com-
pose r I swords.
With the entry of horns and tuba, two-note rhythmic
ostinati are introduced (suggested earlier by some of the .'

basses).
Finally, the three trumpets come in, with the acco~pany­

ing drum rolls. The trumpets all emp~asize the high A, but
. .
the approach to_.i~ now derives distinctly from the workls
charac'teristic mode rather than the diatonicism which has
characterized the other parts in the rhythm1ess accumulation.
This entrance achieves a climax not only in sonority but in
sudden harmonic effect through the confrontation of two
332

modal'vocabularies~ All this ,is achieved by the pattern


---P-G#-A that takes place in each of the parts" ,viz:

Ex. 9 ('ixpt 1)

Between this and the ensuing rhythmless passage for


bells the orchestra breaks off" exposing a woodwind canon"
metrically and modally a throwback to section II. At i"irst
this seems an interruption of the proceedings, but it is im-
portant to note that: 1. The canon involves three pairs of
vOices, each pair approximately a third apart ,in spacing,
with alterations made so all parts stay rigorously within the
mode .--2. -The' characteristic mode of the piece needs more
re'-estab1ishment than the impressive trumpet coup de theatre"
especially if the comp?ser intends to make further dramatic
effects by contradicting it" which" in fact, he does.
'--IIi-the next passage only the -percussion play. It is a
simple crescendo-·decrescendo pattern for glockenspiel" two
sets of chimes, and two vibraphones with tamtam roll. The
five tuned parts play in different keys but each has a pat-
tern resembling the main mode with one important difference.
The six degree is natural instead of flat, viz:
333

Ex. 10

The rhythmless musi.c dies away and brass and timpani


suddenly enter:!! with a climactic section. The bells con~

tinue rhythmless patterns but now all.in F. But the mode is


varied as suggested by the immediately preceding music (as
Ex. 10). The new' mode is:

Ex. 11

~__~o~~j~;~'___d___p_e__c_ij_O__b_O~C~~_

The brass have a canon in three voices using this varied


mode. It is perceptible as a varied mode. The contrast is
enhanced by the confirmation of the main mode by the woodwind
canon that precedes the passage for bells. The meter is ~,
suggest~ng the opening music for solo violins (see Ex. 4a).
The measure

Ex. 12
334
..

near the end of the canonic p~ttern is particularly dramatic,


with its exPloitation of the changed sixth and seventh de-
grees. '--During the canon, the timpani play the figure

Ex. 13

a simple rhythm empha~izing F, once every seven beats. This


produces the prime number ratio of 7:5 which is a cycle juxta-
pesi tion tha.t liiaximi·z:es the. dramatic ,effect of B,uch devices.l
.;:
, as mentioned in Chapter VI. The 7:5 ratio, the varied mode,
the !.f. dynamics, and the forceful use of brass and timpani
.
. make for a convincing climactic passage.
~.

Another free-'rhythm bell passage follows the brass canon •


.
Again all parts are in ?ifferent keys, but the varied mode
occurs in each. The glockenspiel and 'one of the vibraphones
use repeated note figures, ·akin to some of those in the
strings and the horns in th~ orchestral rhythmless sectiona
Due to this preparation and the relatively small number of
simultaneous parts, the repeated notes axe reasonably per-
ceptible so the listener notices some difference between the
two bell-pass~ges, which are otherwise generally symmetrical.

Section 4
'The strings provide 'chordal transitional material, this
time !~rte. The textural approach referred to as subtractive
'.
1n Chapter IV is employed; by this means, dissonant mode-
-
·chords fi). ter down tp unison C' S •. Finally, ins.tead of a
full dissonant chord, a. major tri;;"d is employed, s·till wi tk~
bass note C, sco;red very richly • 'This prepares the next sec-.
. tion, in which triadic harmony is employed at length. The
scoring of the first chord gives the texture to be maintained--
most changes involve very small movements of each individual
part (Ex. 14). With this consonant vocabulary established
the theme (Ex. 2) is stated by brass, reinforced by woodwinds
. . '

and punctuated by held horn notes between phrases.


o

Ex. 14·

The F-chord of Ex. 14 1s thebas1c harmonic factor 1n


the accompaniment to the theme. Each phrase begins an~ ends
with it, and in each there is usually just one other chord.
These chords thus have the effect of flneighboring" chords,
insured by·the fact that the bass moves only·by very small
intervals from C--(in mo'st cases to Db, once to Eb). On the

other hand, this very arrangement of the bass voice causes


336

the intervening chords to be in strong~r inver~ions--~ or §--


than the bas~c F-cho'rd. This enhances their effect in the
prog~essions without, detracting from ~heir neighboring role.
The passage conc~udes,with a few chords of extension. The
,entire progression, from phrase 1 thro~€~,the end of these
concluding chords is given in the following table. Excepting

Phrase 1 F Major
Bb,Minor

Phrase- 2 F Major
Eb Minor

Phrase 3 F Ma'jor
Bb
- Minor
,- "

Phrase 4 F MajOr
Db Major

Phrase 5 F Major'
Bb Minor
F Major
-- ----Phrase 6 -Bb Minor
C'Major
, F Major
Phrase 7 Bb Minor

Phrase 8 F Major
Cb Major' ....

F Major
Eb Minor
Extension Gb MaJor
Cb Major
F Major

the Eb, root in 'phrase 2" the chords respect the main mode
through phrase 6. The C Major chord after phrase 6 is note-
worthy in that it creates a surprising tonal cadence (I-rV-V-
I) just before phrase 7, and represents a strong 'violation of
,337:

the main mode by ~sing G' natural. The, Cb chord, in phrase 8


~ncreases the harmony's remoteness from F and from the main
mode, gaining extra ~ntcnsity from it~ 'contrast to the quasi-
tonal'harmonic motion that precedes it. Finaliya Neapolitan-
like 'Gb is held by several instrument~ as a common tone in
the three penultimate chords of the section.
The final tll0 canonic passages are for three solo vio-
lins and are entirely reminiscent of the opening. The first
one 1:1ses a mode-chord background with notes removed to result
in a major-minor chord sound, unusu~l f9r the work in that
·..:..:it-is-built noton·F but on A... This-enables the· return to
the sound of the opening to become slightly gradual; first
the texture and general sound are presented in a foreign key=-
although still in the mode, and then the second canon uses
the "home" major-minor sound on F.
Many' questions may be raised about this work pertaining,
for example, to the mono-thematicism, the long dwelling on
one chord, the one "tonic/' and the juxtaposition of e;J.ements
of d~fferent species of vocabulary. Formally, one may ques-
tion the deployment of canons, where the woodwind canons may,
seem ordinary after the opening string canon, and between the
. orchestral and bell rhythmless sections. In fact, however,
the on~ theme is only given two complete statements, with
. .
radically different atmospheres and with lI al ot of water
Ui1dE:r the bridge" between them. The F-mode may dominate, but
the inflections of G add variety, as do the removal and
338
' ..

arrangement 'of individual notes--in particular the instance


of the A Major-Minor sonority at the end. The string canons
have thoroughly different raisons d'etre from the woodwind
ca.nons; the former ,serve as rhapsodic, meditative prologue -
~a.nd epilogue to .the work; the latter, which use more parts
at each OCCllrrence--serve to emphasize the mode and add poly-
phOnic dimension within the central portion of the composi-
,tion.
The restraint of t~e work is apparent in that Hovhaness
maximizes the force of some of his favorite devices by very
··-sparing usage. The rhythmless-passages ·gain· some of their
power. from this'. The use of cycles occurs exactly once, in
the clima.c"l~ic brass canon" "There the combination of brass and '
. ,

timpani appears for the only time, other than the very end
of the orchestral rhytbmless passage w'here the drums have a
pe.rfunctory role. Even triadic harmony is used only in the
last statement of the theme, and the chordal.writing at that
point takes on considerable majesty, 'through the slo\'mess of
har.monic change, and the anchoring F-Major, which might be
weaknesses rather than strengths in a longer section or in a
work where triadic vocabulary had been customary. As a
matter of fact, the juxtaposition of voc~bularies works pre-
cisely beca,use' 'there is only the illusion of tonal writing,
in what is still a characteristic mode-dominated situation.
'Instead of all the notes ·at. once, the texture is broken up
by one degree; the riotes of the F-1-1ajor chord alternate, for
339

'the most part~ with the remaining mode-notes in slow blocks •.


, .
-The change from dissonance to consonance seems abrupt, but
the internal relationships make it reasonable and cohesive.

.'
'340

CHAPTER XIII

CONCLUSION

~t 1~ of course too early to make any conclusive evalua-


t~on of HQvhaness's music. However, there are several im-
J>o~t~nt q:uestions along this line' that, can be asked: Has
Hovbaness succeeded in his particular 'intentions? ,Just what
gegree ~n4 consistency of quality has he attained? What
role w111 his work play 'in ~~sic history? I will try to
~tve ~t least partial an~werB to these questions.
One ob~erves t~'10 basic aspirations in Hovhaness I s work
throughout his output. The first is to ~ttain a mystical and
spiritual elevation, usually of a religious nature. The sec-
end 1~ to ~ch1eve meaningfUl combinations of the music of the
E~st with. that of the lvest. Hovhaness' s techniques and
§tyl1et1e ~Fproaches change througnout' ,his career" but these
two basie ideals seem to be in his mind virtually all the
time, "

In this author's opinion" the composer certainly does


succeed in achieving a musical meeting between East and West.
His interest in !ndiail and other Oriental music predates the
current faShionable popularity of those s'tyles, and it may
be that his integration of such techniques into a Western
Ityle may ,
h~ve 'been a eontribu,ting factor to our present
,

awareness of Indian music.


Detractors may claim that Hovhaness's achievement has
'341 .

b89fi ~rely to write Eastern music. for Western'inst~nents.


, '

Certainly this is true of some works. At best~ this achieves


new and mo~e varied tone colors for Eastern sounds whose idiom
is generally more limited. At wortt~ the music lacks spon~

taneitv, dUe to the ~emoval of the basic improvisational char-


acter or much Easte:rn music, ~nd loses :some of the percussive
physical excitement which characterizes performance on E~stern

instruments.
~ut Hovhanes~ts real contribution along this line is
mgre sophisticated. In many works Eastern and ~o]estern tech- .
- -~~ques are closely juxtaposed. Eastern instruments joi~

Western orchestras, a.s in the SyPlphony No. 16, where .the


Kayakeum, a Korean instrument, blends with string orchestra,
and where each plays ~lsic after the fashion of the other.
Classical rUgal developments are often applied to subjects
of ~fi Eastern melodic character. The simultaneous combina-
tiOn or conventional melodic or harmonic'parts with cyclic
'grrhytlmliess music is another example. Often adjacent sec-
tiOns of one work display different stylistic traits. In
the ~ymphony·No. 15, the last movement is a modal fugue, pre-
ceded by several raga-like movements using modes rich· in
.augmented seconds. The total effect of this work is there-
tore more origihal than'any of its movements, bec~use of the
impl~cationthat there· is an emotional or spiritual connection,
if hot a great technical' similarity, be':-;ween Eastern and
vTestern musical approaches.
-
It is much harder to answer the question' .of success in
attaining mystical elevation. This question may be discusse,d
in combination with that of musical quality and consistency,
Bince, with Hovhaness~s stylistic and emotional assumptions,
quality and mystical elevation mean the same thing~

Hovhaness has at his disposal several p~ocedures which


seem to lend themselves to spiritual purposes. ~Some of these
are original, where others are traditional. They include
moda~ contrapuntal writing, theUconstructed" chords, the
free-rhythm +echnique: the various rhythmiC and melodic means
of attaining static rather than a.ctive l~.yo~ts, the tendericy
towards orchestral richness without typically Romantic tutti
blends, ,and the use of unusual progressions of consonant
chords •
. ···These techniques, in themselves, do not afford really
deep emotional results of high musical quality. At least in
this author's opinion, greatness is rarely if ever achieved
~h!ough exclusive reliance on formula. And there is little
. __....doubt that a number of Hovhanessls works are produced entire-
ly by routine application of these tricks. Such works may
be quite att~active, especially to those who find the basic
---techniques agreeable, but it would be hard to defend any
..
sugges.tion of their greatness. I suggest, however, that it
would be just as hard to ascribe really high musical value
to many violin sonatas ·of Mozart, concerti of Telemann, or
piano works of Haydn. An overly large output containing
some works of less than uniformly high quality can still con-
tain great music.' And~ to at least some listeners (including
this one) there are many compositions of Hovhaness that are
extremely.:good. When the composer adds special thought arA
care to the application of his own facile vocabula.ry~ the re-
sults can be breathtaking~ and the music does, in.fact~

achieve a le7el of revelation that is very special.


I con.,~ider the Missa Brev.!!, St. Vartan Symphony, Talin,
1l1___ .L _ _ ~ _ .... _ 'lK_ .... _.&.-i- '11 _ _ _ ~.D" __ • ...._..:J. "r:1_ .... A ___ '.z __ .i._ '\... _ _ .. ..
.L'!,Y i:) "~~-.LVI.I.i:) l'lVI.I.U..,cx. U, J.'lcx.pU.L.L .I..~a. '" a.uu 1: ~'<;1. .n.Upl;.I...L~V, ,",v 1.,11; 1; ..... -

arnples of the highest quality in Hovhanp'~srs music. There


are more. An important point sometimes overlooked in view
of the basic religi~us purpose of all the music, is that
Hovhaness's st.yle is rea~ly qui t'e varied technically. Except
for certain peculiar mannerisms and some aspects of scoring,
it is hard to find much in common between Mysterious Mountai~

and Fra Angelico, unless one also knows other works of


novhaness which bridge this apparent stylistic gap.
·Thus far, the musical world seems to regard Hovhaness
as something of an oddball. Although amateur and school
groups perform his music very frequently, this does not show
any sincere respect. It is a result of the ease of perform-
a.nce of the musi.c, its surface effectiveness, its exoticism,
and the fact that Hovhaness has written works for virtually
any combination fOill1d in schools. But it is very doubtful
~liat the music is taken seriously. There is at least one
aspect in which it probably should be, and in which this
344

author thinks it will at some time. Hovhaness mayor may not


, ,

~nfluence the musical tuture, but,his works provide, some in-


teresting stylistic commentaries on the past. Acquainted
with virtuaily all styles of Eaa'i:~~rn and Western musical tra- ... ~">wI ....

di tion he has embraced sev:e.r'.!lI, b16nding them and adjusting


them to his needs in ways that, point out unexpected but never-
theless basic aspects of the nature of these traditions. Un-
like many composers, he has never felt the need to break from
the pasto Yet, his music is original and not at all, reaction-
ary, although the abused "lord "conservative" may apply to
','

some of the music of the earlier periods.


A~, ,for~the future importance of his music, I have already
, ,

suggested that the current revival of Indian music may be


partially a contribution of his. It is probable that many
of his stylistic formulas will later'be embraced by other .
compos,ers. The more modern s'ounding of these, such as cycles
and free-rhythm, already find relatives in other music.
Hovhaness has spoken~ in private conversation, of specific
German, Japanese and Polish avant-gardists who have already
been influenced by him" but, as always in music, it'is very
hard to prove this. The other composers may simply have
,-evolved similar effects independently. At any rate, when-
ever new sounds that are easily imitated become known, one
may ,expect them to be 'imitated.
But how deep will such influences be? Although the'
present musical climate "IQuld lead' one to expect to see
. '.

Hovhaness I s more spectacul.ar te.chniques used by other com-


·--posers·, that same musical climate. suggests that the aesthetics
of Hovhaness will, at best, be ignored. Certainly Hovhanessts
ideals of direct communication and· religious uplift. are hard-
. .
ly considered desi.rable these days. Many suggest that musi- .
cal evolution is due to swing.back towards more human vaiues,
albeit with modern teclli~iqueso Whether this will actually
c,ccur hardly seems. clear" but if the musica:l attitudes of
the future ever do move away from purely technical innova-
tions towards deeper and more expansive emotional matters"
then HovhanesS.may well be considered one of the most p!omin-
ent figures of this century.
346

APPENDIX·

This appendix consists of three items. Item 1 is an


extract from an article f'rom the ACA Bulletin, Volume VII,
Number 2 called "The Lure of the Orient." The author; James
Ringo, mentions a number of American composers whose music
has been influenced by that of the East. The section about
Hovhaness is quoted. Although it is brief and hardly scholar-
1y, it is
.t'rom the truth. Item 2 is a letter to the editor of' the ACA
----Bulletin which appeared in the next.issue,; Hovnaness is. the
writer and he takes strong objection to the material of
Ii;,em 1.
Item 3 is a sample of Hovhaness's analytical writings
about his works. It is from the jacket notes for the MGM
disc (No. 3453) of the St. Var·tan Symphony. The verbal style
is terse, with almost all ·simple sentences and frequent omis-
-sion of articles. The text seems almost exclusively con~

cerned with phrase lengths, cyclic periods, and imitative


distances. In other words, time and rhythm are the only
matters discussed to any degree.
347

ITEM 1

James Rin 0

-Alan Hovhaness is the most widely known American


Orientalist. He is faithful to Near Eastern musical tradi-
tions, writing directly in Oriental styles rather than imi-
tating them. His music is incantat~ry and ceremonial.
Hovhaness' mystical leaning is apparent in the titles he
choo~es for his works: Lousadzak (The COming of Light),
Khaldis (God of the Universe), Hymn· to a Celestial Musician
and Arevakal (meaning, literally, ""Jihe coming ot the sun"
and dedicated to the turn-ot-the-century spiritualist,
Andrew Jac.kson ThELvis, "Seer of Poughkeepsie"). A set of
compositions termed Orbits are cast. in a structure patterned
. ---after astronomical movements: "in the forms of the motions
of the spheres--the strangeness of the path of a body in
space with ever-shitting relationships to its solar neighbors."
~is ihspiration seems to be largely pre-Christian. Like much
_. of . the mystic. philosophy on which it is -based Hovhaness' s
music is completely devoid of humor, sometimes, of proportion.
It is st raight lipped , visionary, consciously editying in tone;
each listener's reaction to·it depends proportionately on the
degree.ot importance he places on these qualities. The sound
of Hovhanes·s' music is constantly beautiful, like a bolt ot
brocaded Oriental clotl.r, but to many it i8 all pretty much
the same sound.
348

As though realizing this and desiring to stiffen the


texture of his Near Eastern inspirations Hovhaness has
cultivated, along with Oriental procedures, the most stringent
Western ~us1cal disciplines. Canonic imita.tion is predoz1W- .
ant in the Khaldis concerto; there 1s an excellent instrument-
al quadruple fugue. The resultant stylistic ambivalence 1s
handled with skill and a sure hand. Occidental techniques
give a decided lift, an added tension, to some of the com-
-
poser's best music~ underscoring many of his finest moments.
ITEM 2

Letter to the Editor by Alan Hovhaness


from ACA Bulletin, Volume VII, No.3
Dear Sir,
Does a compo:::;er have the right to, self-defense? If so,
let me quote from ACA Bulletin, Volume VII, ~uwoer 2, 1958,
"The Lure of the Orient" by James Ringo, Page 1:J..: "Classi-
fying and pigeon-holing any creative artist is an impertin-
ence."
It is necessary to hear many types· of an artist's works
to form any over-all opinion. To s~y, after hearing one or
two religious works, that the music has no humor is "an im-
pertinence." The music is not devoid of humor. It does not
tell the Stravinsky joke, not ,the Beethoven joke, but it is
possible to open the ears to other modes of humor. Examples
of humor in'recorded works are the 4th movement, the scherzando
po1ymodal canon, from Concerto No. 1 for Orchestra (Arevakal),
the 2nd movement or Jhala Scherzo from Concerto No.7, the
8th,. 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th movements in polymodal canonic
and po1yrhythmic forms from "Saint Vartan Symphony" the 3 tone
saxophone "Jazz" melody with polyrhythms called "Building the
Arkl1 from "The Flowering Peach," ~nd Tangos 1 and 2 from.
Quartet No.2. From music not yet recorded, there are nea~~y

endless examples such as "Jhala to Rajah" and "Jhala to Baha"


from "Lalezar." These Jhalas are to cat friends. Humor is
also found in the comic song "Yar Nazani" and the old
350

fashioned jazz fantasy "J1m Dandy" with parts for electric


.cash register, telephone, player piano, clarinet, saxophone
and bugle.
The music is not devoid of pr~portion. Is Machaut·s
1sorhythmic mass devoid of proportion? Very strict space
for.m principles similar to isorhythmic for.ms are used, often
complex and unfamiliar. Rhythm patterns such as 3 plus 4 plus
4 plus 3 may be sounded on 17, 13, and 19 beat patterns, or
7 plus 7 plus 5 repeated 6 times then 7 plus 7 plus 7 plus 5
or 49 plus 39 plus 19 •
._.. ·Themusic is not "always beautiful." The harsh score
"Hanna" for 2 clarinets and 2 pianos, or harsh movements from
Concertos Nos. 5, 9 and 10 are studies in dissonance. The
music is not "edifying." There is wild terror in the fury
of "Poseidon" and also in the sinister song "0 Goddess of the
Sea" (all the works mentioned have been otten performed in
public with the exception of the "Goddess I, and Concerto
No. 10)e There is inspiration and even possession in the
music, at times exalted, base, beautiful and ugly. .'

The objection to the classifying and pigeon-holing re-


marks by James Ringo is that such remarks grow from familiar-
ity with a small minority of works, ignoring leading stylistic
features.
Sincerely,
Alan Hovhaness
351

ITEM 3

Alan

PART 1

1. Yerk--The title word is Armenian for "song. ". The section


is scored for trombone, timpani, tamtam and-strings. The
trombone melody is cast in troubadour style in cycles of
7. The timpani cycle is of 9 plus 10 or 19. The strings
appear in a polytonal canon 1n 3 The canon for
~eys.
-. .
trombone and strings is for four voices eight measures
apart over a drone and free rhythm mur.mur in the base.

2. Tapor--The title word is Armenian for "processional. tr·_--


The section is scored for 3 trumpets, cymbals, small
gong, and tamtam. The trumpets are cast in a polytonal
canon in 3 keys, 8 measures apart •. The cymbals follow
a cycle of ~, the small gong ·a cycle of 13, the tamtam a
cycle of 7.

3. Aria--Horn and strings. The horn phrases are 6, 6, 5, 4


3,.3,7,3,5.

4. Aria--Trumpet and strings. The trumpet phrases are 4, 4,


4~ 3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 5, 5, 3.

5. Aria--Horn and strings. Introduction 7. Horn 6, 6, 3,_


6, 2, 6.
352

6. Bar--The title word 1s Armenian for.ildance." The section


-~s set for timpani, violins, and bass. Timpani cycle of
19, violins set in a polytonal canon in 4 keys 18 mea-
sur~s apart, the baso in a free rhythm murmur •

. PA.~T 2

i. Tapor--Trumpet~ vibraphone, strings. Trumpet phrases 8,


8, 4, 7, 3, 3, 7, 8, 6. Vibraphone cycle of 11. Drones
1n violas and 'ce11i .and free rhythm murmurs in the vio-
lins and 'bass. The strings end with a fugal passage
---based on the motive of the trumpet solo in tertium
counterpoint.

8. Bar--Timpani, small gong, tamt am , violins. Timpani cycle


of 13, gong cycle of 9, tamtam cycle of 13, the violins
"in a polytonal canon in 4 keys, 11 meas UTi3S apart.

90 Bar--Timpani, tamtam, vibraphone, violins 0 Timpani in


cycle of 5 plus 5 plus 5 plus 9 (or 24), tamtam in cycle
of 11, vibraphone in cycle of 14, the violins in a poly-
tonal canon in 4 keys, 15 measures apart.

10. Estampie--Timpani and strings. Timpani in cycle of 15.


First violins phrases 12, 17~ 3, 9, 2, 10, 2 1/2, 7 1/2,
2 1/2, 2 1/2, 10, 2, 2 1/2, 7 ~i2--an irregular dance
melody. The second violins are allotted a drone, the
violas a 16 measure dance melody" the 'celli and 'basses
a pizzicato dance melody in another mode irregular.
353,

PART 3 "

11. Bar--Strings. A polytonal canon 1n 5 keys, 5'1/2 mea-


sures apart. Beginning and ~nd1ng with interval of the
fifth.

12. Bar--Timpanl, vibraphone, strings. Timpani cycle of 29,


vibraphone cycle of 13. The strings, in B: polytonal
canon of 5 keys (3 keys bowed, 2 keys pizzicato)Q The
first canon 7 measures apart, the second canon 6 mea-
Bures apart.

13. Aria--Trwnpet and strings. Trumpet phrases 5, 5, :7, 3,


3, 2, 2, 5, 7 .,\,

14. Lament-- "Death 'of Vartan!'--Trombone and piano. Rhythm


form: 7 x 4, 4 x 2, 6 x 3, 7 x 3, '4 x 13, 7 x 2, 4 x 17,
7 x 4, 4 x 6.

15. Estampie--Double canon. 4 trumpets, timpani, cymbals,


tamtam, strings. Timpani cycle of 9, cymbals cycle of
7, tamtam cycle of 7. Trumpets canon in 4 voices.
FiI'st canon 7 measures apart, second canon 3 beats
apart. Strings canon in 5 VOices, 2 beats apart.
Double canon in 9 voices. First canon trumpets alone,
second canon trumpets and strings.
354

PART 4

16. ~ (To Sensual Love)--Alto saxophone, timpani, vibra-


phone. The f~rst part is tor saxophone without measure
bars, the second part tor timpani, vibraphone and saxo-
phone, with the vibraphone 7 plus 8.

17. !!!! (To Sacred Love)--Trdmbone and strings~ Measure


phrases 7, 11, 5, 5, 7, 4, 5, 4, 10 2/3.

18. Estampie--Timpani and strings. Timpani 1n cycles of ·7,


Strings in polytonal canon in 4 vOices, 3 keys, 3 mea~

sures apart over drone, the bass in a free murmuri'ng


rhythm. The form is that of tune. and refrain.

19. Bar--Timpani, vibraphone, strings. Timpani in cycle of


13, 13, 13, 10, 13, 13, 13, 10, 13,13,7. Vibraphone
cycle of 33. Strings in a polytonal canon in 5 keys
47, 47) 1, and 27 meaSUl'es -apart •.

20. Aria--Trumpet and strings. Phrases: 10, 9, 3,3, 5,


7, 7, 5, 7, 4; 10.

PART 5

21. ~--Timpani and strings. Timpani cycle of 12. Strings


in· ·polytona.l canon in 5 keys, 7 meas l'.res apart.

22. Bar--Timpani, tamtam, vibraphone, strings. Timpani


cycle of 11, tarot.am bise,.:ts m14sic, vibraphone cycle of
... ~,
355

15. Strings in 4 voice canon, in one key in strict


tertium counterpoint 1 beat apart. The violas, rcelli
and basses add free' rhythm murmurs.

23. ~--Ttmpani and strings. Timpani cycle of 15, 15, 15$


5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6e Strings in polytonal canon in 3 keys
11 measures apart. rCelli and rbasses add free rhythm
murmurs in two additional keys.

Estampis=-Double canon. Four trumpets, timpani,


drum, cymbals, tamtam, strings. Cymbals and tamtam
,·support trumpet cycle. Side d:rum cycle of 7. Timpani
telescoping rhythm of 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, "7, 6, 5,
4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
Four trumpets canon in 4 vClices, first canon 15 measures
apart, second canon 6 measures 'apart. Strings canon in
5 voices 1 beat apart. The double canon is in 9 ,voices,
the first canon in trumpets alone, the second in tr.wnpets
and strings, the third in trumpets and strings, becoming
polytonal climbing one tone and finally two tones higher.
356

CATALOG OF WORKS

The author has compiled the following catalog from


several s(.ources. The major sour("eois the catalog printe1 ' " "·1

by C. F. Peters Corporation. Mr. Hovhaness has been kind


enough to provide an edited copy of this catalog including
a supplementary list of works not published by.Peters. His
editing included adding several works which do not appear in
the printed list, and indi,cating dates for most of the works.
Another source is Item 2 of the appendix which refers to six
or seven works not in the catalog provided by the composer.
••• • . •. I

Several Hovhaness works published in the late 1930's by


Whitney Blake Corp. include a list of'works, up to Opus 36,
compiled in 1939. A'number of works on this list do not ap-
pear in the others available to this author. Some that do
appear have different dates in the different,sourcesj some
opus numbers are applied to different works in the various
listings. Additionally, a small number of works are included
which do not appear on any list but have been heard or seen
in score by the author.
When a piece was worked on at different times, I have
attempted to place it according to the time when the bulk was
composed •. In some cases this was impossible. For example,
some ,works contain several movements, each composed at a dif-
ferent time. In this case, the work is listed when it was
compiled, unless the different sections are actually playable
357

as independent pieces, in which case each section appears with


a separate'listing.
Works that have been pabllshed or which are under con-
tractual obligation to be publiGhed are so indicated.
abbreviation P is used for C. F. Peters, the major publisher.
A work without an indicated publisher is not believed to oe
"

published by this author. Phonograph recordings are listed


where known.
The c01Wiifi headed "number" indicates the conJectured
chronological position of each work .
.,.
"

358
".
. "-
-;r.c--

Number Opus Date Title and.Description (If known)


1 53 1924 Jesus Lover of 11'9 Soul
2 1 1927 Oror (Lullaby)--Violin and Piano (P)
..
3 i'~'193 1927, Suit~ for Cello and Piano (Pi
61
4 9 1927, Piano Quintet No. 1 (P)--Disc:
62 Poseidon Society
5, 34 1927, Christmas Song--Watchman Tell Us
5a, 62 of the Night--three versions exist:
5b Op. 34 Soprano, Organ; Opus 34a .
Bass Solo, SATB, Organ; Opus 34b,
Bass Solo, SATB, Small Orchestra
(P--all three versions)
6 1 1928, Suite for String Quintet and Piano
34
-f' 156 1930 The Moon'Has a Face--Medium Voice
Piano (P)
8 2a 1931 Boreas and Mt. Wi1dcat--Orchestra
36 (Whitney Blake)
9 52 1932 No.' 3 of Mountain Idylls--Piano
#0 {Associated)--disc.: MGM
10 '3 1935 Trio in E minor--Violin, Cello,
Piano (P)
11 4 1935 Missa Brevis--Bass Solo, SATB~
Strings, Organ (P)
lla 44 1935 Celestial Fantasy--String Orchestra
44 (Peer)--based on parts of the M1s~a
Brevis--Disc: MGM
12 158 1935 A11e1uia--SATB, Organ (p) (Later in-
#11 57 corporated into #203)
13 .. 5, 10 .. 1935 Three Preludes and Fugues--Piano (P)
14 12 1935 Sonata Ricercare--Piano (P)
15 140 1935 The God of Glory Thundereth--Tenor
60 Solo, SATB, Organ ~P)
359

16 ,ha
...
.,~ 1935 Hear My Prayer, 0 Lord-~SSATBB (P)
60
17 2, 2a 1935 Monadnock--Orchestra {Pl
36
18 6 1935 . Tocc3.ta~·and Fugue--Piano (Whitl1ey
Blake)
19 7 How I Adore Thee--Medium VOice,
Piano (P) Disc: Poseidon
20 8 1936 String Quartet No. ,I (P)
20a 128 1936 Prelude and Quadruple Fugue--
54 Orchestra (Associated) Orchestr~­
tion of 2 movements of the above--
Disc: Mercury
21 9 1936 Suite No. 1 for Piano
22 10' . 1936 Preludaand Fugue for Flute and
Clarinet
23 11 1936 Prelude and Fugue for Flute and
Oboe
24 12a, b 1936 Two Motets for Soprano and Flute
25 14 1936 Suite No. 2 for Piano
26 15 1936 Fantasy for Piano (Whitney Blake)
27 16 1936 Hear My Prayer, 0 Lord--6 part
choir (believed distinct from #15)
28 18 1936 Easter Anthem--Soprano Solo, Choir,.·
Organ
29 19 1936 Three Songs--Voice and Piano
30 20A 1936 Lament for Voice and Piano (Whitney
Blake)
31 13 .. 1935 Prelude and Fugue for Oboe and
37 Bassoon
32 5, ·30 1935 Three Odes of Solomon--Voice· and
37 Piano (P)
33 21 1935 Suite in D minor for English Horn
31 and Bassoon
360

34 29 1935 Lay1a--Voice and Piano (Whitney.


37 Blake)' .
35 33 1935 Seven Love Songs of Hafiz (first
38 version) (Whitney Blake)
36 17 1937 Symp!'lony No.1, "Exile" (P)
37 20B 1937 Lament tor Piano
38 22 1937 Piano Sonata (Whitney Blake)
39 23 1931 o Lord, Our Lord--Bass, SATB, Organ
~

40 24 1937 Why Hast Thou Forsaken Me--


Soprano, SATB, Organ
41 25 1937 The Voice of the Lord--TenoT, SATB,
Organ
42 26 1937 Suite No. '1 for Orchestra ,

43 27 1937 Cello Concerto (Whitney Blake)


44 28 1937 I Will E~tol Thee--Voice and Piano
45 32 1937 To the Blessed There is Joy--
SOpral'lIO, Female Choir
46 22 1937 Mystic Flute--Piano (P)
.47 31 1938 Hymn to Shasta--Orchestra
48 35 1938 Four Songs
49 36 1938 Ghaza1--Piano (p)
50 11 1938 Sonata--Violin and Piano (p)
51 144 1938 Macedon1an Mountain Dance-··Piano
(p) Disc: MGM
144a 1938 Orchestral Version of the Above (P)
- 144b,· 1938 Macedon1an Mountain Dance No. 2,--
62 Piano (p)
53 '52 1938 Slumber Song--Piano (Leeds)
#2 Disc: MGM
142 1938 Out of the Depths--Voice and
#3 58 Organ (p)

, ..
361

142 1938 Version of the above with added


#3a 60. SATB ( p ) ' .

55 20 1938 Nocturne tor Harp


56 24 1939 Yar Na~ani~-S~ng

51 25 1940 Behold, God is My Help--SATB (P)


67
58 26 1940 o Lord ot Hosts--SATB (P)
67
59 21 1940 o Lord, Rebwce Me Not--SATB (P)
61
60 40a 1941 Psalm and Fugue--String Orchestra
(p) Disc: Crest .
61 40b 1941 AlleluiaoandOFugue--String Orches-
tra (Rongwen) .Di~c: MGM ': .
62 41 1941 Protest and Prayer--Male Choir,
68 Piano (P)
63 46 1941 Let Us Love One Another--SATB (F)
68
64 1941 Dance Gha'zal--Pianc (Whitney Blake)
65 58 1941 Sandra's bance--Piano (Whitney
Blake) . .
66 31 1942 Two Shake-Speare Sonnets
·67 135 1942 Owtober Mountain--Percussion Saxtet
(P) Disc: Urania
68 Jim Dandy--Jazz Fantasy (date high-
ly conjectural: My only reference
to this work is in the letter quoted
as Item 2 of Appendix)
69 43 i2 Armenian Folk Songs--Pian (p)
70 52 Lousnag Kisher--Piano (Theodore
#1 Presser)
11 52 1943 . Siris Dance--Piano (Leeds)
#3 Disc: MGM
72 70 1943 Fantasies for Brass Choir
67
13 38 1944 Mazert Nman Rehani--Piano (p)
74 45 1944 Armenian Rhapsody No. l--Stri~~..
Orcl,~straand Percussion (Pee~ r"

75 51 1944 Armenian Rhapsody No. 2--String


Orchestra (Rongwen) . Disc: MOM
76 189 1944 Armenian Rha~sody No., 3--Strlng
Orchestra (P) Disc: Poseidon
77 47 ' 1944 Varak--V:olin and Piano (P)
78 48 ,1944 Lousadza,k- -Concerto for Piano
and String Orchestra (Peer) Discs:
Dial (Hovhaness cond.', MOM
(Surinach.cond. )
79 49 1944 Khrimian Hairig--Trumpet and
String Orchestra (P)
80 213 1944 Return and Rebuild the Desolate
65 P1aces--Concerto for Trumpet and
Wind Orchestra (P) Disc: Mace'
81 50 1944 E1ibris--Concerto for Flute and
String Orchestra (Peer)
82 184 1944 Symphony No. 10--0rchestra (P)
65
83 39 1945 Artinis--Piano (P)
84 53 1945 Tzaikerk--Small Orchestra (Peer)
Disc: Dial
85 54 1945 Invocations to Vahaken--Piano and
Percussion {P)Disc: 78
86 55 1945 2 Pieces for Piano (P)
87 56 ,. 1945 Chahagir--Solo Viola (Rongwen)
#1
88 '56 Yeraz--Solo Violin (Mills)
#2
89 57 1945 Anahid--Chamber Orchestra (P)
Disc: MGM
363
....
,~-

90 ·60 1945 ~ihT--2 Pianos (Theodore Presser)


#1 Disc: . 78 . .
91 1945 Vosdan--Chamber Orchestra
'48
92 : ..,,,-
.< 64 1945 Aval~ 'he Hea1er--Cantata fo!'
46 Soprano, Trumpet, String Orchestra
(Peer)_
93 37 1946 Vijag--2 Pianos (P)·
94 62 1946 Etchmiadzin--Opera
~

94a 62b 1946 Prayer of St. Gregory--Trl..ilJlp€t and


Strings (Derived from #94) {Peer)
Disc: Poseidon
94b 1946 Agori: "First Version" --Small
Orchestra (Derived from #94)
95 66 1946 Kohar--Cha.mbe:r o.rchestra (p)
96 67 1946 Saris--Violin and Piano (P)
97 175 1946 Lake of Van Sonata--Piano (p)
59
98 176 1946 Madras Sonata--Piano (P)
60
99 239 1946 Tne Flute Player of the Armenian
71 Mountains
.,
100 179 1947 Symphony No. 8 "Arjuna" (P)
101 La1ezar (See Appendix Item 2)
102 19 1948 Angelic Song--Cantata for Soprano.,
Horn and S'~:"'ings (p) .
103 75 1948 Sosi (The Forest of Prophetic
Soundl--Small Orchestra (Peer)
104 63 .. 1948 Shatakh--Violin and Piano (Peer)
Disc: Dial
105 32A, B 1948 Two Songs (P)
105a 32B 1948 o Wor1d-~TromboneJ Piano: Tran-
scription of the 2nd of the Above '
(P) , , '
106 71 1948 Haroutiun--T~et and String
Orchestra (p)
.
.y. ,

101 74 1948 Pagan Saint--Voice and Piano (p)


#1
108 74 1948 Lullaby of the Lake--Voice and
#4 Piano (P) Disc: Poseidon
109 74 I Heard Thee Singing~-Voice and
·#5 Piano (P)
110 74 1948 Raven River--Voice and Piano (p)
#8
III 76 1948 30th Ode of Solomori--Baritone,
SATB, Small Orchestra, (p) .
112 64 1948 Achtamar--Piano (Peer) Discs:
#1 Dial, MGM.
113 238 1948 Songs with Armenian 'Words
114 78 1949 Art1k--Concerto ror Horn and
String Orchestra (p)
115 14 1949 Ta.r-or--Band (p)
.. ~
.1..1.0 15 Sui ile for Band (p)'

117 177 1949 Shalimar--Sui te for Piano (P)~'


60
1:t8 77 1949 Zartik Parkim--Concerto for Piano
and Small Orchestra (Peer)
119 94 1949 Diran--Concerto for Baritone Horn
or Trombone and String Orchestra
(Robert King)
120 58 Sharagan and Fugue--Brass Choir
(Robert King) Disc: MGM
121 52 1949 No. 2 of Mountain Idylls--Piano
#5 (Associated) Disc: MGM
122 61 1949 Divertimento--Wind Quartet or 4 .
Clarinet~. (p)
123 84 1949 Black Pool of Cat--Volce and Plano
1f1 (P) Disc: Poseidon
124 84 Innlsfa11en--Volce and Piano (P)
#2
125 95 1949 3 Sop~s--Volce and Plano (P)
126 23 1949 Suite for Oboe and Basso~n (P)
67
127 59 1949 Is There Surviva1?--Ba11et for
Orchestra (Alternate title: King
Vahaken) (P) Disc: .MGM
.128 82 1950 Transfiguration--Tenor, SATB (P)
129 81 1950 Janabar--Sma11 Orchestra (Peer) .
130 1950 Agor! "Second Verslon"--Symphony
for Double Orchestra
131 80 1950 Symphony No. 9 "St. Vartan
180 Symphony·'-.-Sma11 Orchestra (Peer)
Disc: MGM
132 52 1951 Lu11aby--Piano (Edwin H. Morris)
#7
133 68 1951 Sing Aloud--SATB (P)
134 69 1951 Sanahln--Organ (P) ..
68
135 72 1951 Canzona and Fugue--Brass Choir
67
136 73 1951 Khirgiz Suite--Violln and Piano
(P) Disc: MGM
137 85 1951 Fantasy on an Ossetin Tune--Piano
(Peer) Disc: MGM ..
138 86 1951 Make Haste--SATB (p)
139 87 1951 4 Motets--SATB (Associated)
.
140 88 1951 Concerto No. 1 "Arevaka1"--Orchestra
(Associated) Disc: Mercury
366

141. 1951 Concerto No •. 2--Violin and String


Orchestra (P) Disc: MGM
142 1951 Upon Enchanted Ground--Flute,
Cello, Harp, Tamtam (p) Disc:
Columbia
143 91 1951 Khaldis--Concerto for Piano, 4
Trumpets, Percussion (Robert King)
Disc: MGM
144 92 1951 Shepherd of Israel--Cantorial Voice
and Orchestra (Leeds)
145 1951 Three Improvisations of Folk tunes--
Band
104 1951 Allegro on a Pakistan Lute Tune--
#6 (Based on one movement of the ab.ove)
Piano (Pe~r) Disc: RCA .
146 106 1951 Game1an and Jhala--Carillon '(P)
147 147 1951 String Quartet No. 2 (P)
. ,
148 111 1952 Pastoral No. l--Piano (Peer)
#1 Disc: MGM
149 111 1952 Hymn to a Celestial Musician
#2 (Peer) Disc: MGM
-150 90 1952 Orbit No. l~-Flute, Harp, Celesta,
#2 Tamtam (P) Disc: MGM .'
151 93 1952 Talin--Concerto for Viola and'
String Orchestra (Associated)
Disc: MGM

152 97 1952 Quartet No. I--Flute, Oboe, Cello,


HarpSichord (P) Disc: Classic
Editions (Rachmanioff Soc,iety)
153 99 1952 Suite for Violin, Piano and Per-
cussion (P) Disc: Columbia
154 101 1952 Hanna--2 Clarinets, 2 Pianos (P)
100 1952 Ave Maria--SSAA, 2 Oboes, 2 Horns,
#la Harp (Assoc1ated--as part of
"Triptych") Disc: CRI
156 . 100 1952 As on the Night (Christmas Ode)--
11b Soprano, Celesta, String Orchestra
(Associated--as part of "Tr1ptyc~")
Disc: CRI
157 11~ 1952 Quartet No. 2--Flute, Oboe, Cp.l1Q.;··
HarptiicilOrd (p) Disc: MGM ..,,-

158 114 1952 Harmonica Concerto (P)


159 177 1952 From the End of the Earth--SATB,
60 Organ (p)
160 103 1952 Jhala--Piario (Peer) Disc: MGM
161 102 1952 Orbit No. 2--Piano (Peer) Disc:
MGM
162 16 1953 Fantasy--Piano (P) Disc: Poseidon
. _.-163 98 ··1953 Partita for Plano and Strings
164 98b 1953 Concerto No. 4--0rchestra
165 100 1953 Easter Cantata--Soprano, SATB,
#3 Small Orchestra (Associated--as
part of "Triptych") Disc: CRI
166 115 1953 Canticle--Soprano, Small Orchestra
167 Concerto No. 5
168 Concerto No. 6
169 116 1953 Concerto No. 7~-Orchp.stra (P)
Disc: Louisville
170 141 1953 Anabasis--Narrator, Soli, Chorus,
Orchestra (P)
171 109 1953 Piano Quintet No. 2
64
172 170 1953 Symphony No. 5 (P)
63
173 52 1953 No. 1 of Mountain Idy1ls--Piano
#4 (Associated) Disc: MGM
174 1~{ 1953 The World Beneath the Sea No. 1-.-
Saxophone; Harp, Vibraphone, Timpani,
Gong (p)
368

115 .. 96 1954 Suite for Piano (p)


116 122 1954 Duet for Violin and Harpsichord
(P) Disc: CRI
117 123 1954 Vision from High Rock--Orchestra
(P) -
118 124 1954 Glory to God--Soli, Chorus, Brass,
Percussion (P) ..
119 125 1954 The Flowering Peach--C1arlnet,
Saxophone, Harp, Percussion (As-
sociated) Disc: MGM
180 126 1954 The Stars--Soprano, Choir, Small
Orchestra (P)
181 127 1954 Harp Sonata (P)
182 129 1954 Tower Muslc--Wind Ensemble
(Roniwen) Disc: MGM
131 1954 The Brightness of Our Noon--SATB
(C. C. Birchard)
184 138 1954 Dawn Hymn--Organ (p)
185 169 1954 Live in the Sun--Voice and Celesta
60 (p)
·186 181 1954 Koke No Niwa--English Horn, IIarp"
60 Percussion (P) Disc: CRI
190 1954 Symphony No. 13 (p)
60
188 100 1955 The Beatitudes --·Chorus, Small
#2 Orchectra (Associated--as part of
IITriptych"J
132 1955 SYmphony No. 2 "Mysterious Mountain"
(Associated) Disc: RCA
190 139 1955 o Lady Moon--Soprano, Clarinet,
Piano (E. B. Marks)
191 143 1955 Ad Lyram--So1i, Double Chorus,
Large Orchestra (p)
192 145 1956 Piano Sonata (P)
193. 146 1956 To The God Who Is In The Fire--
65 Tenor, TTBB, Percussion {P}
DiBc: Univ. of Illinois (1956
version)
194 148 1956 Symphony No. 3 (p)
195 150 1956 7 Greek Folk Dances--Harmonica and
Piano (P) Disc: Decca
33 1957 Love So~s of Hafiz (Second ver-
sion) (P) Disc: Poseidon
197 117 1957 Concerto No. 8--0rchestra (F)
Disc: Poseidon
198 151 .1957 o Goddess of the Sea--V·.)ice and
Piano (p)
199 152 1957 Do You Remember the Last Silence-- '
Fiano (P) .
200 153 1957 Dawn at Laona--Voice and Piano (F)
201 154 1957 Persephone--Voice and Piano (P)
202 155 1957 Meditation on Orpheus--Orchestra
(P) Disc: CRI
203 158 1957 Look Toward the Sea--Baritone,
SATE, Trombone, Organ (P) .
204 191 1957 Poseidon Sonata--Piano (P)
·205 Concerto No. 9
206 Concerto No. 10
207 35 1958 The Lord's Prayer--Choir, Organ (P)
208 160 1958 Ps~lm 148--Bass,SATB, Organ (P)
209 157 1958 Magnificat--Soli, Chorus,
57 Orc~estra (P)· Disc: Louisville
210 161 1958 o For A Shout of Sacred Joy--
·Choir~ Organ (p)
211 162 1958 Psalm 28--Choir, Organ (P)
212 163 1958 In Memory of an Artist--String
Orchestra (P)
370
:"l,._

213 "164 1958 Sextet--Recorder, String Quartet,


Ha.rp&ichord (P)
214 165 1958 Symphony No. 4--Win~ Orchestra
(P) Disc: Mercury
215 .', 166 1958 Suit~ for Accordion (P)
216 167 1958 Glo~J to Man--Choir, Organ (P)
217 168 1958 Child in the Garden--Piano (p)
218 . 172 1959 Blue Flame--Opera (P)
219 173 1959 Symphony No. 6 "Celestial Gate"
60 (P)
220 174 1959 Accordion Concerto (p)
221 175 1959 Symphony No; 7 "Nanga Parvat"--
Wind Orchest~a (P) Disc:" Mace
222 192 -,°5 ,0
1 Bardo Sonata-"-Piano {p}
60
223 134 1960 Immortality--Soprano, Chorus, Organ
(P)
224 159 1960 Wfnd Quartet (P)
65
225 i82 1960 Fuji--Fema1e Chorus, Small Orches-
tra. (P)
226 185 1960 The Burning House--Opera (P)
227 186 1960 Symphony No. 11 "All Men Are
69 Brothers!I (P) Disc: Poseidon.
The first movement is based on
material dated 1928, 1932.
228 188 1960 Symphony No. 12 !lChoral" (P)
229 194 1961 "Symphony No. 14 "Ararat I, --"lind
Orchestra (p) Disc: Mace

230 195 1961 Mountain of Frophecy--Orchestra
(P)
231 110 1962" 2 Sonatas--Koto o~ Harp (P)
371

232 119 Sonata--Ch'in (Chinese Instrume~t)


(P)
233 120 "1962 Sonatina--Pla.no (p)'
234 121 1962 Sonata--Ryuteki (Flute), Sho
(Organj ~:(P)
235 136 1962 Ko-01a~U--2 Pianos (P)
236 171 1962 Sonata--Kichiriki (Oboe), Sho
(Organ) (p)
237 183 1962 Wind Drum--Unison Chorus, Small
Orchestra
238 197 1962 Spirit of the Avalanche--QPera {p}
239 198 1962 Three Visions ot St. Mesrob--
Violin, Piano (p)
240 199 S~hony No. 15, "Silver Pilgrimage~'
(p) Disc: Louisville .
241 200 1962 Sonata for Trumpet and Organ (F)
:Oisc: Redwood
242 201 1962 String Trio (p)
243 202 1962 Symphony No. 16--Kayakeum, Korean
Percussion" String Orchestra (p)
Disc: Poseidon .
244 36a, b Two Ghaza1s--Piano (p) (Neither
Gzaha1 duplicates #~9, despite
the identical opus number) .
245 80 I Have Seen the Lord--So~rano"
Choir, Trumpet~. Organ (P)
246 130 1963 Sonata--2' Oboes and Organ (p)
64
247 137 1963 o God OUr Help in Ages Past--
Chorus, Organ (p)

248 196 Pi1ate--Opera (p)
249 203 Symphony No. 1'1 n Symphony for Metal
Orchestra"--6 flutes,3 Trombones~
Percussion (p) Disc: Mark
312

250. 204 S~phony No •. 18 "Circe" (P)


251 205 Mysterious Horse Before the Gate--
Trombone, Percussion (P)
252 206 In the Beginning was the Word--
Soli, Choir, Orchestra (P) Dis'e-:
Baptist Society
253 18 1964 Variations and Fugue--Orchestra (p)
254 30 1964 Four Bagatelles--String Qua.rtet; (P)
255 113 1964 Three Haiku---Piano (p)
256 118 1961~ Sonata--Flute solo (P) Di~c: CR!
257 207 1964 Meditation on Zeami--Orchestra (P)
258 208 1964 String Qu~rtet No. 3 (p)
#1
259 209 Floating World "Ukiyo"--Orchestra
. (p) Disc: Columbia
260 210 1964 Bare November Day--Clavichord (P)
261 212 1964 Dark River and Distant Bell--
Harpsichord (p)
107 Island Sunrise--OrchestTa (P)
Disc: Co 1 Uiilbia
.263 133 World Beneath the Sea No. 2--
#2 Clarinet{ Harp, Percussion, Contra-
bass (pJ
264 211 Fantasy on Japanese Woodprints~­
Solo Xylophone and Orchestra (P)
Disc: Columbia
265. 214 Five Visionary Landscapes--Piano (p)
266 215 Trave1lers--Opera. (p)
267 218 The Holy City--Orchestra (P) ..
Disc: eRI
268 . 219 1965 The Leper King--Opera (p)
269 216 1966 Ode to the Temple' of Sound--
Orchestr'a (P) .
· ..... :~
313

270 217 1966 Symphony No. 19 "Vishnu" (P)


211 19 1967 Six Danc~s~·-Brass Quintet (P)
212 105 1961 Make a Joyful Noise
213 ·4--108 1961 Sextet for Violin and PerCUSl::iiOll
(p)
214 220 Fra Angelico--Orchestra (P)
Disc: Poseidon
215 96 Suite for Piano (Different from
#11) (P).
276 221 Adoration
277 21 Suite for En~lish Horn. and Bassoon
new version (only one movement re~
la.ted to'#33]
- .
278 13 Prelude and Fugue for Oboe and
Bassoon (Diffej;ent from #31) (P)
279 42 1968 I Will Rejoice in the Lord
280 222 1968 Praise the Lord with Psaltry--
Chorus, qrchestra
281 223 1968 Symphony No. 20 "Three Journeys .
to a Holy' Mountain'!--Band (P) .
Disc: Mark
224 1968 Requiem and Resurrection--Brass
and Per.cussion (P) Disc: Poseidon
225 1968 Mountains and Rivers Without End--
Large Chamber Group; Disc:
Poseidon
284 226 1968 Vibration Painting
285 83 1969 Hymn to Yerevan--Wind Orchestra (P)
Disc.: . Mace
286 . 93 I 1'1111 Lift Up Mine Eyes--Chorus, •
Orga.n
227 Lady of Light--Cantata-Opera;
Disc: Poseidon
374

288. 1969 A Rose for Miss Emily--Ba1let


289 228 1969 Shambala
290 6 1970 New Toccata. for Toccata and Fugue
(see No. l8)--Piano (p) ..
. 1'·

291 208 1970 String Quartet No. 4 (p)


#2
292 229 1970 And God Created Great Whales--
Orchestra w:i.th taped sounds of
Whales; Dise: Columbia
293 230 1970 The Spirit of Ink
294 :231 .1970 Night of the Soul
295 232 1970 Consolations
296 233 1970 All the World's a Dance of
Snobbery--Suite for Piano
297 234 1970 Symphony Etchmiadzin (No. 21)--
46 2 Trumpets, Small Orchestra;
Disc: Poseidon
298 235 1970 Saint Nerses ··the Gracefl).l- - 3
Clarinets
299 236 1971 Symphony No. 22, "City of Light!!
300 237 1971 Nagooran-·.Double Bass a.nd Percus-·
sion
301 240 1971 Kom~chi--Piano

302 241 1971 Tsamic;os !~os. 1, 2; Tsamico and


#' s 1-3 Fugue--Piano
303 242 1971 4 Songs
304· 243 1971 Saturn--Chamber Cantata
305 244 1971 Island of Mysterious Bells--4 Harps

You might also like