Teacher Training Session Plan: Active Learning: Stage & Aim Procedure Materials / Alternatives
Teacher Training Session Plan: Active Learning: Stage & Aim Procedure Materials / Alternatives
Teacher Training Session Plan: Active Learning: Stage & Aim Procedure Materials / Alternatives
How can you cover the content when using active learning?
Consider what students can do outside of class to more effectively prepare for in-class activities:
- Incorporate pre-class reading assignments.
- Assign videos for students to watch and answer questions about.
- Require students to complete pre-class quizzes (to ensure that students have read the material) online.
How can you incorporate active learning into various classroom settings?
- Become familiar with a few active learning techniques like "classroom discussion" and "think-pair-share"
- Choose one or two techniques and modify them so that they address learning goals in your class.
- When implementing active learning techniques, follow these general steps:
o Use activities to draw attention to issues and content you feel are most critical.
o Establish rules of conduct and civility to encourage appropriate participation.
o Introduce the activity and explain the learning benefit to the students
o Control the time cost by giving students a time limit to complete the task.
o Stop the activity and debrief. Call on a few students or groups of students to share their thoughts
and tie them in to the next steps of your lecture.
o Consider using classroom response technologies, video clips and smartphones
Some students may not accept new learning activities with complete ease. Rather than trying to engage all
students, focus on engaging more students in more meaningful ways.
- Again, start small. Integrating many active learning techniques in one session may irritate students and
discourage their participation. Explain the benefits for using active learning techniques and connect the
activity to student learning outcomes for the class.
- Use a quick icebreaker or two early in the term to help students become comfortable with one another and
to set expectations for an interactive class.
Types of Active Learning Activities
A class discussion may be held in person or in an online environment. Discussions can be conducted with any
class size, although it is typically more effective in smaller group settings. This environment allows for instructor
guidance of the learning experience. Discussion requires the learners to think critically on the subject matter and
use logic to evaluate their and others' positions. As learners are expected to discuss material constructively and
intelligently, a discussion is a good follow-up activity given the unit has been sufficiently covered
already.[20] Some of the benefits of using discussion as a method of learning are that it helps students explore a
diversity of perspectives, it increases intellectual agility, it shows respect for students’ voices and experiences, it
develops habits of collaborative learning, it helps students develop skills of synthesis and integration (Brookfield
2005). In addition, by having the teacher actively engage with the students, it allows for them to come to class
better prepared and aware of what is taking place in the classroom.[21]
A think-pair-share activity is when learners take a minute to ponder the previous lesson, later to discuss it with
one or more of their peers, finally to share it with the class as part of a formal discussion. It is during this formal
discussion that the instructor should clarify misconceptions. However students need a background in the subject
matter to converse in a meaningful way. Therefore, a "think-pair-share" exercise is useful in situations where
learners can identify and relate what they already know to others. So preparation is key. Prepare learners with
sound instruction before expecting them to discuss it on their own. If properly implemented, it saves instructor
time, keeps students prepared, helps students to get more involved in class discussion and participation and
provide cumulative assessment of student progress. The "think-pair-share" method is useful for teachers to hear
from all students even those who are quiet in class. This teaching method functions as a great way for all the
students in the class to get involved and learn to work together and feel comfortable sharing ideas. It can also
help teachers or instructors to observe students and see if they understand the material being discussed.[22] This
is not a good strategy to use in large classes because of time and logistical constraints (Bonwell and Eison,
1991). Think-pair-share is helpful for the instructor as it enables organizing content and tracking students on
where they are relative to the topic being discussed in class, saves time so that he/she can move to other
topics, helps to make the class more interactive, provides opportunities for students to interact with each other
(Radhakrishna, Ewing, and Chikthimmah, 2012).
A collaborative learning group is a successful way to learn different material for different classes. It is where
you assign students in groups of 3-6 people and they are given an assignment or task to work on together. This
assignment could be either to answer a question to present to the entire class or a project. Make sure that the
students in the group choose a leader and a note-taker to keep them on track with the process. This is a good
example of active learning because it causes the students to review the work that is being required at an earlier
time to participate. (McKinney, Kathleen. (2010). Active Learning. Normal, IL. Center for Teaching, Learning &
Technology.) To create participation and draw on the wisdom of all the learners the classroom arrangement
needs to be flexible seating to allow for the creation of small groups. (Bens, 2005)
A student debate is an active way for students to learn because they allow students the chance to take a
position and gather information to support their view and explain it to others. These debates not only give the
student a chance to participate in a fun activity but it also lets them gain some experience with giving a verbal
presentation. (McKinney, Kathleen. (2010). Active Learning. Normal, IL. Center for Teaching, Learning &
Technology.)
A class game is also considered an energetic way to learn because it not only helps the students to review the
course material before a big exam but it helps them to enjoy learning about a topic. Different games such as
Jeopardy! and crossword puzzles always seem to get the students' minds going. (McKinney, Kathleen. (2010).
Active Learning. Normal, IL. Center for Teaching, Learning & Technology.)
Learning By Teaching is also an example of active learning because students actively research a topic and
prepare the information so that they can teach it to the class. This helps students learn their own topic even
better and sometimes students learn and communicate better with their peers than their teachers.
Gallery Walk is also an example of active learning where students in groups move around the classroom or
workshop actively engaging in discussions and contributing to other groups and finally constructing knowledge
on a topic and sharing it.
Active Learning Leads To Higher Grades
Think back to when you learned how to ride a bike. You probably didn’t master this skill by listening to a series
of riveting lectures on bike riding. Instead, you tried it out for yourself, made mistakes, fell down a few times,
picked yourself back up, and tried again. When mastering an activity, there’s no substitute for the interaction
and feedback that comes from practice.
What if classroom learning was a little more active? Would university instruction be more effective if students
spent some of their class time on active forms of learning like activities, discussions, or group work, instead of
spending all of their class time listening?
A new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences addressed this question by conducting
the largest and most comprehensive review of the effect of active learning on STEM (Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics) education. Their answer is a resounding yes. According to Scott Freeman, one
of the authors of the new study, “The impact of these data should be like the Surgeon General’s report on
“Smoking and Health” in 1964–they should put to rest any debate about whether active learning is more
effective than lecturing.”
Active learning engages students in the process of learning through activities and/or discussion in class, as
opposed to passively listening to an expert. It emphasizes higher-order thinking and often involves group work.
They then searched for classroom experiments where students in a STEM class were divided into two groups
– one group engaged in some form of active learning, while the other group participated in a traditional lecture.
At the end of the class, both groups took essentially identical exams.
The authors looked at studies where both groups were taught by the same instructor and the students were
assigned at random to each group, as well as less ideal experimental conditions, where the instructors differed,
or the students weren’t assigned to groups at random. They evaluated the performance of these studies using
two metrics – their scores on identical exams, and the percentage of students that failed (receiving a D, F or
withdrawing from the class). In all, they identified 228 studies matching their criteria, to analyze further.
1. Students in a traditional lecture course are 1.5 times more likely to fail, compared to students in courses with
active learning
2. Students in active learning classes outperform those in traditional lectures on identical exams
I asked Scott Freeman whether star lectures with strong teaching evaluations should be interested in these
findings as well. He responded,
“Most of the studies we analyzed were based on data from identical instructors teaching active learning v
lecturing sections; some studies (e.g. Van Heuvelen in Am. J. Physics; Deslauriers et al. in Science) have
purposely matched award-winning lecturers with inexperienced teachers who do active learning and found that
the students did worse when given “brilliant lectures.” We’ve yet to see any evidence that celebrated lecturers
can help students more than even 1st-generation active learning does.”
I’ll leave the last word with Scott, who makes a strong case for active learning.
“[Under active learning,] students learn more, which means we’re doing our job better. They get higher grades
and fail less, meaning that they are more likely to stay in STEM majors, which should help solve a major
national problem. Finally, there is a strong ethical component. There is a growing body of evidence showing
that active learning differentially benefits students of color and/or students from disadvantaged backgrounds
and/or women in male-dominated fields. It’s not a stretch to claim that lecturing actively discriminates against
underrepresented students.”