Unofficial Guide India 2018
Unofficial Guide India 2018
Unofficial Guide India 2018
This guide is not an official communication from the Rhodes Trust. It was collaborative-
ly prepared by some Indian Rhodes Scholars to ensure that all applicants have equal ac-
cess to sufficient guidance for preparing the personal statement, which forms part of the
application for the Rhodes Scholarships for India.
GENERAL TIPS
1. A personal statement is one of the most important elements of the selec-
tion process, and often forms the basis of the subsequent interviews. It is
meant to be a reflection of your personality, and hence it is paramount
that you avoid generalization, and ensure that the statement relates
closely to you as a person. Through your essay, you should give the re-
viewers a flavor of your personality, interests and goals, almost like they
have met you in person. Most importantly, your personal statement
should make the reviewer want to meet you and further discuss and ex-
plore your interests with you. Remember that the personal statement
must represent you well enough such that if you are invited to an inter-
view, there should be clear congruence between what you have written
and who you are as a person.
2. Through your personal statement, you should be able to convey to the
reviewers a story about the larger motivation that drives your work. The
personal statement should ideally have a central theme or focus, with the
narrative connecting its various elements, whether it be the subject mat-
ter you wish to study, your accomplishments, your work experience or
your reasons for applying to the University of Oxford. The statement
should thus be a cohesive whole, held together by this narrative, rather
than a collection of unrelated information. When framing a balanced
personal statement, do remember the criteria the reviewers will be using
to determine if you are a suitable candidate for the Rhodes Scholarship –
more about those specific criteria later.
3. Ensure that various aspects of your professional and personal life are
logically put together, as far as possible. The reviewers, on reading the
1
statement, should be able to discern what you wish to study, your career
plans, and your reasons for choosing these, while sensing a strong com-
mitment to your goals. It is crucial that your personal statement high-
lights a clear link between your choices and the experiences you have
had. Having said that, there is no one method to put these things togeth-
er. Do what works best for you and your story – after all, it is your per-
sonal statement.
4. Ensure that the personal statement is within the 1000 word limit as stated
in the application rules. If the personal statement exceeds 1000 words,
the application, at the discretion of the National Secretary, is liable to be
rejected or only the first 1000 words of the personal statement may be
provided to the Selection Committee.
5. Given the word limit, you cannot elaborate extensively on all points.
While the reviewers should be able to follow your chain of thought, as
evident from the statement, your statement should also be thought pro-
voking, leaving room for further discussion and debate.
6. Your statement should not merely be a narration of your experiences and
accomplishments but should also describe to the reviewer the impact
these have had on you, and their contribution in defining your thought
process. Use these to further build your narrative.
7. Ensure that your personal statement is not merely a more elaborate ver-
sion of your résumé as this would be a lost opportunity. The reviewer
will already have a copy of your résumé. The statement should instead
connect your various relevant achievements, qualifications and experi-
ences to the larger narrative, and describe their impact on the choices
you have made. At the same time, it is crucial that your personal state-
ment is in sync with your résumé. The statement should reflect the activ-
ities and accomplishments mentioned in your résumé, but within a larg-
er context; the résumé should reflect the interests you conveyed in your
statement. The reviewer should thus be able to make sense of one while
looking at the other.
8. It is not necessary that long sentences and complex language be used, in
an attempt to impress. In fact, these might hinder readability. It is best to
stick to a style of writing you are comfortable with, as long as it conveys
2
the message adequately. Ensure that you have proofread the essay mul-
tiple times, and there are no spelling or grammatical errors. Sloppiness
and carelessness are poor signs and are unlikely to be regarded well.
9. The personal statement, particularly the portions on your areas of inter-
est and future study, should not be technical, such that only persons
well-versed in the field would be able to completely understand. At the
same time, the panel reading your personal statement has probably had
years of experience in assessing statements and hence it should not be
highly simplistic either. The focus should be on communicating your ar-
eas of interest with clarity, and your thought process in arriving at these.
10. To get started with the process of writing your personal statement, try
thinking about why you are doing what you are doing, what aspects of it
most excite you, the way in which the experiences of your last few years
have shaped you, etc. Remember that people are rarely able to come up
with a comprehensive and well-written statement on the first go. The key
is to think about the various elements that you want to put in it and then
find a way of connecting them together.
11. It is important to remember that the Rhodes Scholarship is a merit and
not a need-based scholarship. Providing gratuitous information about
one’s family background or indications of need are not required and will
not in themselves strengthen your candidature. Of course, there are no
prohibitions on mentioning these if they are relevant to your story.
A. Is there some prior preparation I should engage in, before writing the
personal statement?
It would be useful to look at the website of the Rhodes Scholarships. The web-
site, for instance, lists certain criteria the panel looks for in every potential can-
didate for the Scholarship. Try and ensure that your personal statement is
broadly responsive to these criteria. The website also provides information
about the Scholarship, along with videos of Scholars from the previous years,
narrating their experiences at Oxford, as a Rhodes Scholar, including their
views on writing a personal statement. It would also be helpful to read the will
3
of Cecil Rhodes, the founder of the Scholarship, to understand the motivations
with which the Scholarship was constituted. All candidates should also read
carefully the Conditions of Tenure for the Rhodes Scholarships and the infor-
mation provided in the Rhodes India Memorandum. Ensure that you meet the
eligibility criteria in terms of nationality, age, education and academic achieve-
ment, as mentioned in Point 2 of the Rhodes India Memorandum. Point 4(g) of
the Rhodes India Memorandum details elements the Trust looks for in a per-
sonal statement.
4
nally, the panel is interested in understanding how an education at Oxford fits
into your future career plans. It is important therefore to demonstrate a certain
degree of clarity of thought in your statement about what you wish to study and
why, why Oxford and what you plan to do in the future. These need not be concrete
and pinpointed, but a degree of focus will be appreciated. While it might be dif-
ficult to identify your exact career path, it is useful to have an idea of what ca-
reer options you are considering and why. You can address these elements in
any manner you desire, as long as you are able to clearly convey your thoughts
to the reviewer.
For example, a candidate details below what she wishes to study at Oxford,
drawing on past experiences and her conclusions based on those.
5
low the poverty line cannot even dream of. I aim to use my learning from the
study of social sector schemes in developing countries and that about capital
markets to arrive at logical solutions. An M. Phil in Economics will provide me
an academic base and better foundational framework within which these ine-
qualities could be examined. I shall be in a better position to assess various de-
velopmental strategies and propose better solutions, most importantly. A dedi-
cated focus on academic research at Oxford will help me explore the world fur-
ther and allow me to go beyond limited model-specific assumptions of the dis-
cipline.
Here, a candidate explains in her essay how she developed an interest in inter-
national criminal law.
6
international criminal tribunal and I realised with a thrill that my generation
had been entrusted with the responsibility of making it successful. This desire
to promote international criminal law led to my participation in the Henry Du-
nant Moot organised by the International Committee of the Red Cross and the
activities I undertook as an Executive Board Member of the University Interna-
tional Law Society. It is with a view to understanding the relationship between
law and mass atrocities that I opted for the Law and Anthropology of Violence
course this semester.
In this extract, a candidate elaborates on her future career plans in her personal
statement, justifying these based on work she has previously undertaken.
7
In the following segment, a candidate explains the questions she attempts to
address, both through her study at Oxford and her career, and how she plans to
do so.
8
could include involvement in a variety of activities including sports, music, de-
bate, dance, theatre, and artistic pursuits, with special emphasis on teamwork.
Truth, courage, devotion to duty, sympathy for and protection of the weak,
kindliness, unselfishness and fellowship could be demonstrated through work
with non-governmental organisations, involvement in committees at your Uni-
versity focusing on public service, participation in activities contributing to so-
ciety in some manner at the school, community or college level, personal inter-
ventions you may have made on issues you care about and so on. Moral force of
character and instincts to lead, and to take an interest in one's fellow beings re-
quires you to showcase leadership skills. Leadership can be of different sorts
and there is no one definition - this could include leading a student union,
heading a committee at your University, convening a course, leading a protest,
organizing awareness movements and camps, organizing activities at your
University including conferences, competitions and fests, being an Editor of a
journal, undertaking path-breaking work, doing something that inspires others,
and so on.
Further, our advice for an applicant would be to not get bogged down by what
you might yourself perceive as a grave weakness in your profile, such as being
from an unfamiliar university or not having participated in sporting activities.
There is no uniform way in which all successful applicants meet the Rhodes cri-
9
teria. Just as there is no one thing that is likely to make your application suc-
cessful, it is equally true that one single perceived weakness is unlikely to over-
shadow many strengths in the application. There are many ways to satisfy the
Rhodes criteria and each is unique.
Finally, instead of altering your aspirations and goals in a way that you feel
would ensure that your application is viewed in a more favourable light by the
Rhodes Trust, you would be well advised to focus on building a narrative
around your achievements and strengths that is authentic and that you feel tru-
ly invested in.
In the extract below, a candidate begins her essay by talking about a movie,
which left a profound impact on her, tying together different concepts which
have always been a source of interest for her.
10
between gender, sexuality and health, putting a name to and forging a nexus
between concepts that have always fascinated me.
Here, a candidate begins her essay by recalling an incident from her childhood.
G. How do I show that the University of Oxford is a good fit for me?
Your personal statement should clearly specify what aspect of the training you
would receive at Oxford makes it unique, and particularly suited to your inter-
ests. One way to do this is to identify certain specific courses, and subjects with-
in these courses, which are relevant to your interests (though these choices
might change by the time you ultimately get to Oxford). You could also look at
faculty you would like to work with, research centres at Oxford specializing in
your area of interest, the teaching methodology at Oxford (the tutorial system),
the academic and social culture at Oxford or other factors which you can relate
to, or a combination of all of these. Try and avoid generic remarks about Ox-
ford’s academic environment, history or excellence, and tailor the reasons to
suit your background and interests, thus personalizing your essay.
Two candidates use a combination of several of these factors to show why Ox-
ford would be the ideal next step for their careers.
11
Rights course. Again, I feel that my understanding of individual liability for
war crimes will be enhanced by understanding how the humanitarian law re-
gime works in that context, through the International Law and Armed Conflict
course. The structure of the BCL course is another incentive. Oxford University
offers the unique advantage of being focused on personal tutorials, while still
allowing for independence of research. I believe that such guidance will equip
me better to realise my dream of engaging in the international criminal law re-
gime.
12
Rhodes scholarship will allow me to pursue my dream and I hope with all my
heart that I will be given a chance to do so.
Here, a candidate refers to a study she conducted, which helped her identify
certain interests crucial to her research.
13
how technology and efficient delivery can create a workable incentive matrix
and create social change.
14
al criteria beyond the scholastic ability of the candidate, and your engagement
in various non-academic activities could demonstrate these qualities. However,
once again, try to weave these accomplishments in to the larger narrative of
your essay.
While it is quite common for candidates to mention only the first one-year
course in their applications, the candidate below mentions a two-year plan.
K. I took a year off to work after my graduation, but spent my time work-
ing on something unrelated to my core research interests. How should
I make sense of this in the personal statement?
If the work experience is absolutely unrelated to your area of interest, there is
no strict need to mention it in the essay. Remember: the essay is about taking
your narrative forward. If something does not take your narrative forward, it
need not find space in your personal statement. However, often things that
seem ‘unrelated’ can be ‘related’ if they lead to skill building that will ultimate-
15
ly help your long-term project. For example, you may have acquired practical
or soft skills that would facilitate the realisation of your long-term plans.
As per the application rules, three of these letters have to be academic, implying
that you have to ask people who have taught you during your undergraduate
or postgraduate degree. They have to be able to comment in detail on your aca-
demic ability and be confident that you will fare well at Oxford. Which of your
teachers you choose is up to you - for instance, you could approach those who
have taught you subjects particularly relevant to your stated areas of interest, or
those whom you have worked with as a teaching or research assistant as part of
coursework.
The other three letters may either be academic, or can be professional. The latter
could include persons you have interned with, teachers from your school, etc.
These referees have to, and should have had the experiences that enable them
to, attest to your character and/or your involvement in extra-curricular/service
16
or leadership activities, commenting critically about whether you fulfil the non-
academic requirements of the Scholarship.
Point 4(h) of the Rhodes India Memorandum, along with the ‘Guidance for Ref-
erees’ appended to the Memorandum provides information on the nature of
references the Trust requires.
N. Does the age at which one decides to apply for the Scholarship have a
bearing on one’s chances of being chosen as a Rhodes Scholar? Does
the fact that you were unsuccessful in a previous attempt to get the
Scholarship negatively impact one’s chances?
Your age (as long as it falls within the bounds set out by the memorandum) is
not a deterrent to your chances of winning the scholarship. In other words,
whether or not you are awarded the Scholarship will be a function of your abil-
ity to meet the criteria that the Rhodes Trust is looking for, and not of the age at
which you apply. Relatedly, it is important to note that multiple attempts at the
scholarship are allowed, and don't work against you - there have been multiple
Rhodes Scholars who have won it on their second attempt.
O. Will I be required to submit any test scores at the time of applying for
the Scholarship, such as English proficiency test results or GRE scores?
The Rhodes Scholarship application process does not require the candidate to
pass any qualifying exams (GRE, Subject GREs, etc.) or language proficiency
exams (TOEFL, IELTS, etc.) but the specific course that you are applying to may
do so. Since your application for your chosen course at the University of Oxford
is to be submitted after scholarship results are released, there is no need to
submit any test scores along with the Rhodes Scholarship application.
17
accessible for a generalist audience. Annexure 2 to this Guide contains an essay
submitted by a Rhodes Scholar from a science background that effectively bal-
ances these conflicting interests.
We have also annexed to this guide two personal statements of previous candi-
dates (which have been anonymized). We would like to emphasise once again
that there is no set format a personal statement has to follow. These have been
provided solely as an example, and should not be relied on as a template.
18
ANNEXURE I
The lights dim, my eyes skim the audience. We are watching Fishing at the Stone
Weir, two parts of Quentin Brown’s project documenting the lives of Netsilik
Eskimos. Subtitles are provided for the hearing-impaired, but I notice some-
thing is amiss—every time the Netsilik people speak, [non-English narration]
blares from below the frame, reducing their language’s complexity to merely
something we are not required to comprehend. Absence of human conversation
is abbreviated to [sil.], short for silence. Crashing waves, sounds of the industri-
ous architects creating the weir, breaths a woman takes as she braids her hair--
all relegated to [sil.].
The lights dim, my eyes skim the audience. My second public performance, I
perform an intensely personal and political piece responding to misogyny in
pop culture. I gather strength from the sea of faces staring at me, indulging me,
laughing with me, not at me. My universe of verse is all about pace- fast, seeth-
ing, breathing, multiple rhymes. Beginning in haste, I try to say as much as I can
within the first minute. Slowly, however, I register the audience’s response. It is
in that silence I realize that my poetry truly belongs.
I have explored my own motivations and imperatives, concluding that I am fas-
cinated by silences, by absences—that which we render mundane, profane, not
worthy of enquiry. Fortunate to have been guided by undergraduate history
and literature professors, I’ve realized that processes of inscription and docu-
mentation are as much projects of concealment as they are of discovery. After
multiple (and admittedly, challenging) trysts with Foucault in libraries, I want
to interrogate those lapses, the absence of filmic texts as legitimate sources of
academia, the absence of women/ femme and queer voices behind the screen,
and indeed, to engage with the problematic of what makes a woman a woman,
what makes a film a film, what happens when films make women, and when
women make films?
I have approached pro-filmic realities at pre-production, due to my background
in theatre and amateur screenwriting, production through the two projects I
undertook for my classes and videos of my poetry pieces, and in post-
production, with sales and marketing initiatives, as part of my internship with
XYZ. I have however, yet to explore the philosophy and ontology of film it-
19
self—the languages in and through which it is articulated, the activation of the
past through the present, the imposition of the present’s politics on the past,
and how films are constantly being created—not just through processes of pro-
duction, but those of consumption.
Similarly, I have recognized and expressed my feminist politics through my
art—registering protest against the hystericization of the feminine, queerphobia
and menstrual taboos through slam poetry. As a working member and later
head coordinator for the Gender Studies Cell at my University, I interacted with
luminaries in the field of gender-based and sexual equality, and organizations
addressing child abuse, sex work and marital rape. I have feminist awakenings
while reading Judith Butler, writing poems as catharsis, or reading feminist film
theory by Teresa de Lauretis, yet it is only when I ask people what personal
pronouns they use, or unlearn the everyday ways in which the patriarchy mani-
fests itself that I feel I have received an education.
It is in pursuit of these perceived trivialities, these educations hidden in what
we confirm as mundane—like intimate human interaction in the frenzy of the
subway, or histories of the humble bench in my neighborhood park—that I turn
to Oxford. Oxford offers two Master of Studies courses in Film Aesthetics and
Women’s Studies, both under the Department of Modern Languages, and ancil-
lary Humanities’ departments like History and Philosophy, allowing me to crit-
ically engage with practical implications of feminist film theory, through one-
on-one mentoring, tutorial work, and resources available at the Bodleian library
and Taylor Institution.
Deeply invested in the politics of art and performance as sites for both normali-
zation and subversion, I aspire to explore how space and time are reified, recast
and rendered through filmic languages—imaginary lines, color, bodies, light,
background scores. Moreover, the politics of (participatory) spectatorship, in-
terrogating the ‘male gaze’, film theatres as spaces for aspiration and creation,
active mediation by audiences through intra-audience interactions, new media
technologies, and memory-- provide crucial arenas for research, particularly in
the Indian subcontinent. I aim to address these questions through the vantage
of filmic and gendered intertextualities. Keen to examine how cinema shapes
and negotiates the feminine, and within the feminine, narrative ideals and devi-
20
ations, it is imperative to me that this exercise is not situated in an academic
vacuum.
In the future, I aim to teach film through film, exploring the possibilities, limita-
tions and challenges the audio-visual possesses in pedagogy. I hope to bridge
the gulf between theory and praxis, between seas of words and worlds of see-
ing, working on feminist media technologies and texts—both through the crea-
tive and the academic. It is my dream to establish screenwriting and filmmak-
ing labs and schools, affording access to story-tellers whose voices have been
subordinated, often along the intersections of class, race, caste, gender expres-
sion, and sexual orientation. I want to explore the ethics of aesthetics, through
blank spaces— simple subtitles change audience viewing and mediation, and
silently (violently) determine the intended audience. Poetry is about enuncia-
tion, and renunciation. I seek to pursue a double major in Film Aesthetics and
Women Studies at Oxford to find the joy in exploring silences, and to triumph
in the silences that joy affords.
21
ANNEXURE II
22
From a young age, reading has been a source of great pleasure, of new ideas
and perspectives, and has helped me be more articulate. I enjoy reading fiction -
most recently, I have been particularly taken by Elena Ferrante, Adichie, Zadie
Smith, Perumal Murugan, and Virginia Wolf. Aside from this, a significant por-
tion of my reading is academic.
This brings me to something I am passionate about - theoretical physics and
mathematics. During my study, I've had the good fortune to travel, interact
and, more recently, collaborate with professors and graduate students from
some of the best institutes across the world and this has greatly augmented my
understanding and love for the subjects. Over time, I have become interested in
three topics - quantum field theory (QFT), general relativity, and string theory.
Last summer, I was an ABC Fellow at the XYZ Centre for Theoretical Sciences
with Dr. DEF. We worked on understanding recently proposed N=3 supercon-
formal field theories by mapping them to a class of integrable systems. While
this project ultimately turned out to be only partially successful, it was an ex-
tremely rich learning experience, particularly in learning how research is done.
Having completed a majority of the credit requirements for my MSc. early, I re-
turned to XYZ for my thesis. Here, I am working with Dr. DEF and Dr. GHI
(postdoctoral researcher) on formalising the Worldline approach to QFT, and
using it to address issues in standard QFT. Apart from potentially being a fresh
source of perspectives and techniques for QFT, it's been extremely rewarding
because it has involved learning a lot of string theory and revisiting older ideas
in a newer light.
I am also working with Prof. JKL on the relationship between certain soft theo-
rems (specifically, the sub-leading double soft theorem) and asymptotic sym-
metries. Doing so successfully, would bring to a close one leg of the pioneering
program initiated by Prof. MNO, et. al. in 2014, and I've been particularly excit-
ed by this. It's been thrilling to be a part of a large group of researchers across
the world piecing together our current understanding of these theorems over
the past three years.
I would like to pursue a DPhil. in Theoretical Physics - I want to do research,
specifically in the field of QFT and strings. Between the Rudolf Peierls Centre
and the Mathematical Institute, Oxford has a strong and diverse string theory
group, and would be the ideal environment for me to pursue my research and
23
mature as a physicist. Given the opportunity, I would like to work in Prof.
ABC's group (on holography and transport phenomena) or with Prof. DEF (on
string phenomology) for my doctoral studies.
Alongside my research, I want to work in education. I enjoy teaching, and have
been fortunate to have ample opportunities to do so - I've taken numerous lec-
tures in college, helped teach a course, and have taught mathematics and phys-
ics at school. Through school and college, I have been surrounded by people
who take education seriously and actively work towards addressing the many
questions it raises, and I've seen myself grow interested in the same. I'm excited
to see what form this interest takes in the future.
In conclusion, I would like to say that over time I have discovered for myself
that I am happiest and at my most productive when I'm learning, or when I'm
using what I've learnt in a meaningful and helpful way. If there is one overarch-
ing aim or wish that I have for myself, it is that I continue to do so.
24