National Foods by Saqib Liaqat
National Foods by Saqib Liaqat
National Foods by Saqib Liaqat
Final Project
BS-BA 6th
Submitted by:
Saqib Liaqat
Registration No.
04151713051
Submitted to:
Dr. Ibrahim khan
National Foods Limited
ASSETS
Non-current assets
and equipment
Current assets
Shareholders' equity
Revenue reserve
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
Commitments 21
Other comprehensive income (Items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss account) :
Remeasurements of
retirement benefit liability (37,491) (5,530 ) (14712) (41148) (6461)
Cash paid for goods & services (19,808,411) (14,463,131) (12,908,168 ) (9,742,647) (8,763,322 )
Net cash flow from financing activities (1,134 ) 167,455 (731,839 ) (712,840) (596,781)
INCOME STATEMENT
Trend analysis of NATF of past five years shows that there is gradual decrease jn the net profit of the
firm. The sales of the cost has alos been increasing gradually. Gross profit of the firm has also heen
decereasing from 2014 towards 2018. Not only cost of goods sold but also there is seen to be
gradual increase in the other exoenses of the firm. That’s why there is gradual decerease in every
successive year.
reserves
The financial postion of the furm shows that the decerease in assets in both current and fixed assets
from 2014 towards 2018. The decerease in fixed assets shows that company has been selling its
fixed assets in order to overcome the decerease in its profits. But there is increase in its fixed assets
in 2018 as compared to 2017. The piabilities of the firm are also seen to be increase in every
successive year in both cases that is current liabilities and longter liabilities. So this comparison
shows decerease jn total assets and increase total liabilities that shows decerease in performance in
every succussive year.
Profitability Ratios
Gross Profit Ratio % 31.05 32.17 33.13 35.36 35.05
Net Profit after Tax to Sales % 4.76 5.80 5.87 8.51 7.55
Return on Equity % 27.77 32.80 29.88 39.57 37.55
Return on Assets % 9.39 10.34 11.82 17.78 14.75
Profitability Ratios graphical illustration:
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Series 1
As earlier mentioned in the common size analysis of the income statement, there is seen to be
decerease jn the gross profit margin in every successive uear. The highest gross profit margin was
seen in 2015 that was 35.36 . But since then there is gradual decerease in the gross profit margin as
compared to every previous uear.
Column1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00%
Column1
Net profit margin has also show the same kind of fluctuations as we saw in gross profit margin. That
is highest net profit was seen in 2015 and since then there is gradual decerease in the net profit of
the firm.
2014 37.55
2015 39.57
2016 29.88
2017 32.80
2018 27.77
Return on equity is also decereasimg since the year 2015. There was slight increase in it in 2017 but
again in 2018 it declined. That means on average this firm is producing around 28% return on its
equity.
Return on assets:
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Series 1
Return in assets has also shown gradual decerease since the year 2015. On average this firm is
producing almost 12% reutrn on its assets.
2014 15.40
2015 17.14
2016 13.27
2017 14.00
2018 20.79
No. of days of payable have been increasing in every successive year since 2014. Then there was
decline in number if days in 20116 and 17 but then again it increased to 20.79. That means they
were paying their account payables after 20 days.
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Series 1
Assets turn over Asset turnover is seen to be very low of this firm. And there is also gradual decline
in this since 2015. Turnover was seen to be Only 2.5 percent of the total assets.
Inventory turnover:
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Series 1
Inventory turniver is seen ti be inncrease in everysuccessive year. Inventiry turnover indicates how
efficiently the management js cinverting inventory in to cost of goods sold.
Receivables turnover:
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Series 1
Recievable turnover graph shows that company has increased its percentage in every successive
year since 2015. But the percentage kf this turniver is not very satisfying.
Payables turnover:
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Series 1
Payable turnover is also seen to be decerease in the recent years that means firm js not paying early
payables.
Solvency ratios:
Series 1
12
10
0
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Series 1
Longterm debt to equity ratio shows that what percentage of the equity is financed by longterm
debt. The percentages show that about 4 to 5 percent of equity is financed by longterm debt. And
there is no significant change in this percentage during the previous years except for 2017 when this
percentage was increased to 10% that is seen to be highest during the past 5 years.
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Series 1
Debt to total assets ratioshows that what ercentage if assets are finaced by debt. The comparison
shows that in average 55 to 60 percent of assets of the firm are financed by debt. And there is no
significant change seen in these percentages during the past five years.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Series 1
Total debt to total equity ratios show that what percentage of firm’s equity is financed by otal debt.
It is seen that 50 to 55% of firm’s total equity is financed by debt sources. And again there is not any
significant amount of increase seen in this type of ratio during the past 5 years that means it keeps
on increasing or decereasing by 1-2 percent every year.
Cashflowr ratios:
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Series 1
Operating cashflow ratio basically shows to what percentage of cash you receive fr your sales. The
graph of opeartng cashflows shows that on average NATF is able to get 8 percent cash from ts
operations. That mean for every 1 dollar they receive 8 cents of cash. And this graph also shows
highest percentage was seen in 2015. And since then there is gradual decerease in this percentage.
Series 1
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Series 1
This ratio basically shows how efficiently assets if the firm are being used to henerate cash for the
firm. Highest percentage of this cashflow was seen in 2015 when organization was able to generat
25% cash if the total assets of the firm. Then there was sudden fall in this percentage in 2016 but
and again increase in 2017 when firm generate 18% cash if its total assets. This shows that
management is not using its assets effeiciently since 2016.
This ratio shows that to what extent the firm is able to meet it current laibilities from cash ibtained
through opeartions. The highest civerage was seen again in 2015 when firm was able to cover its
50% of current liabilities from its cash of operations. Then there was sudden dropfall in this civerage
in 2016. But in 2017 and 18 the firm has again shown an improvement in its ability to civer current
liabilities thus cubering upto 27% of its liabilities. But this percentage is still far behind because it
covers inly 1/4th of the corrent liabilities.