Betrayal of Gandhi:

who envisioned true democracy

A study by
SK Sharma, Managing Trustee, People First

Empowering the smallest person,

Reuniting India, Pakistan & Bangladesh
as envisioned by Gandhi.
About the Book

This book is based on studies

spread over several years by
People First, a trust in India
dedicated to instituting good
governance. Its managing
trustees are Dr Ashok Khosla, a
scientist & Chairman
Development Alternatives, a
prominent NGO in sustainable
development, and the Author,
Santosh K. Sharma, a former IAS
officer of MP-56 batch.

Unlike other books on Gandhi,

this book is not a mere
documentation of Gandhi's
historic role in liberating India
from the shackles of British
imperialism, but to highlight what
went wrong at the time of
independence that led to the
partition of India and is now
fostering endemic political and
bureaucratic corruption,
environmental degradation and
ongoing abuse of the common
people living in villages and urban
slums, and to propose a
legitimate non violent process for
instituting truly egalitarian
democracy as advocated by
Gandhi. The book dwells on the
spiritual values that Dharma of
Indian origin described in the
Oxford English Dictionary as “The
Eternal Law of the Universe”
stood for. It also offers
a pragmatic process for
reunification of India, Pakistan &
Bangladesh. Once India
institutes such democratisation
reforms, all nations of the will
come under the pressure of their
people to institute similar reforms
through the same process. The
world will then become a
confederation of self-reliant local
governments guiding the
emergence of a just world order
based on social justice and equity

Price: Rs.250/-
Gandhi :
The inspiration for true democracy betrayed

A study by
SK Sharma, Managing Trustee, People First

Empowering the smallest person,

Reuniting India, Pakistan & Bangladesh
as envisioned by Gandhi.

1
 Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the support and encouragement provided
by (1) PA Sangma, then Speaker Lok Sabha for circulating a document of
Lal Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation headed by Sunil Shartri, and People
First on instituting true democracy with empowered local governments in
the Golden Jubilee Special Session of Parliament held in 1997, (2) Sunil
Shastri for supporting the initiative who was later marginalised by the political
system for it, (3) Justice MN Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India
for his message of support, (4) KS Sudershan, Head of Sangh Parivar, for
his letter conveying his full support to the Author’s analysis and process of
reforms, (5) Dr Mahesh Chandra, Sanskritik Gaurav Sansthan, for his support
and assistance in refining the concepts, (6) Dr Subash Kashyap, Rashtriya
Jagriti Sansthan, former Secretary General, Lok Sabha for insights and
publishing documents of People First in his journal, (7) Eminent Artist Ranga,
Cartoonist Nainan and Architect Sumit Ghosh for the numerous creative
illustrations, (8) Architect Anil Laul for insights in traditional sciences and
sustainable development, (9) Graphic Designer Narendra Shrivastava and
Veena Deveshar for graphics, (10) Major General BN Raizada for insights in
security issues and Afghan tribes, (11) Col. Valmiki Katju for insights, (12)
Sansar Chandra, Advisor People First; for mobilizing support and organising
demonstrations with commitment; and (13) Librarians, India Habitat Centre
and India International Centre for references. The Author is especially grateful
to (13) Dr Ashok Khosla, Chairman Development Alternatives and Co-trustee
People First for his insights and providing the Author space for undertaking
this research, (14) His wife Savita who has been a source of great
encouragement to him, (16) the staff of Development Alternatives for its
assistance. (6) KC Agrawal author of the book “Crusade India: Towards a
new dawn” for sending me a complementary copy of his book that throws
insights about business management. The Author apologises to those who
feel offended by any of the observations made by him. His objective is not to
criticise anyone but to analyse the issues and propose a legitimate, non-
violent process for rejuvenating India and position it such that it leads the
emergence of a peace loving, sustainable world order based on social justice
and equity.

Santosh K. Sharma, Managing Trustee, People First,

A trust dedicated to instituting good governance.

Website: www.peoplefirstindia.org. Email: sksharmaowe@yahoo.com

3
 Preamble
The Author has, based on original research, conceptualised and proposed
in this book a legitimate, non violent process for instituting true egalitarian
democracy as advocated by Gandhi and currently practised in the best
western democracies such as in Switzerland, Holland and Scandinavian
countries and but for unbridled capitalism in USA. It is hoped that this book
will facilitate establishment of true democracy symbolised in Ram Raj, rule
of the ancient Indian monarch Ram, articulated by Gandhi as village republics.

Gandhi was voted Man of the Millennium in inter state polls conducted by
the Time Magazine USA. Dileep Padgaonkar, then Editor Times of India, in
an article titled ‘Lead Thou Us On’ wrote on January 7, 2000, “He is a
natural choice. As natural as naming the tallest peak, the longest river, the
brightest star in the heavens. And yet there is something odd about how,
in Indian eyes, Mahatma Gandhi figures way ahead of other leaders who
shaped India in the twentieth century.

India has effectively turned its back on the man it reveres as the Father of
the Nation. The reverence finds expression in ritualistic gestures. His birthday
and the day of martyrdom are observed with prayers, visits to his Samadhi,
lectures and seminars, messages from the President and the Prime Minister,
and the singing of his favourite hymns. But otherwise there is scarcely a
thought given to the ideals he cherished, the battles he fought, the techniques
of mass mobilisation he evolved and the example he set through his words and
deeds. For official India, the Mahatma is a mere icon who deserves obeisance,
twice or thrice a year, with a garland of marigolds, a dash of vermillion, an oil
lamp and a bundle of homilies. Outside the political fold Mahatma Gandhi’s
name evokes a doleful indifference. Now and again someone might poke
fun at his eccentricities and contradictions. But on the whole, there is little
serious attention paid to what he achieved in his own lifetime, to what he
has come to symbolise for peoples and nations across the world. Indeed,
India at this start of a new century is set on a course that the Mahatma
would be horrified to witness. The apostle of non-violence would have to
contend with a nation engaged in the heady pursuit of nuclear arms. The
votary of harmony between faiths and castes would have been appalled by
the incidence of strife in society. The advocate of self-reliance would choke
with embarrassment as he sees India embracing globalisation with gusto.
The champion of austerity and self-denial would not know where to look in a
country gone berserk in its quest for a consumerist life style.

What then accounts for the Mahatma’s commanding popularity as revealed

in this poll? The answer surely lies in the Mahatma’s appeal as a
quintessential moral force. India may have rejected the path of ahimsa,
non-violence, satyagraha, peaceful non cooperation, swadeshi and self
reliance. It may sneer at his “experiments with truth”. It may short shrift to

4
his impassioned plea for religious and social harmony. But all along India,
somewhere in its inner recesses, is alive to the fact that what Mahatma
Gandhi preached and practised was deeply rooted in values that stood the
test of time in all cultures and civilisations. India also acknowledges that
few leaders in history strove as hard as he did to ensure that there was not
the tiniest gap between his beliefs and his actions. That is why he will
continue to haunt India’s conscience as long as violence, injustice, poverty,
caste and communal animosity, greed and the mindless indulgence of the
senses numb the creative and spiritual faculties of its people. Amongst
every encircling gloom, he alone is the kindly light that leads.”

Gandhi is Christ crucified again.

He is truly the Apostle of the Third Millennium.

A Superior Soul
“A leader of the people, unsupported by any outward authority; a politician
whose success rests not upon craft nor mastery of technical devices; but
simply on the convincing power of his personality; a victorious fighter who
has always scorned the use of force; a man of wisdom and humility, armed
with resolve and inflexible consistency, who has devoted all his strength to
the uplifting of his people and the betterment of their lot; a man who has
confronted the brutality of Europe with the dignity of a simple human being,
and thus at all times risen superior. Generations to come will scarce believe
that such a one as him walked the earth in flesh and blood”.

Albert Einstein

5
 The Christ Spirit
“He is unique in the nobility. His very life is another name for sacrifice. He
is sacrifice itself. He covets no power, no position, no wealth, no name and
no fame. Offer him the throne of all India, he will refuse to sit on it but will
sell the jewels and distribute the money amongst the needy. Give him all
the money America possesses, and he will certainly refuse to accept it,
unless to be given away for a worthy cause for the uplift of humanity. His
soul is perpetually anxious to give and he accepts absolutely nothing in
return —- not even thanks.

His power of sacrifice becomes all the more irresistible because it is wedded
with his paramount fearlessness. Emperors and maharajas, guns and
bayonets, imprisonments and fortunes, insults and injuries, even death itself
can never daunt the spirit of Gandhi.

He is a liberated soul. He has what is known as the Christ spirit.

Insert signature

Rabindranath Tagore

Max Muller on Hindu Dharma

“If I were asked under what sky the human mind has most deeply pondered
over the greatest problems of life and I found solutions to some of them,
which well deserve the attention even of those who have studied Plato and
Kant, I should point to India. And if I were to ask myself from what literature we
who have been nurtured almost exclusively on the thoughts of the Greeks,
and Romans, and of one of the Semitic race the Jews, may draw the corrective
which is most wanted in order to make our inner life more perfect, more
comprehensive, more universal, in fact more truly humane a life, again I
should point to India.”

Max Muller
A German philosopher who did in-depth research on India’s value system
Source: “The World’s Religion” by Huston Smith Harper San Francisco,
A Division of Harper Collins Publishers

6
 Contact us
Santosh K. Sharma
Res. Tel 2647-1516. sksharmaowe@yahoo.com

Dr. Ashok Khosla

Mobile: (98102) 72963

Sanasr Chandra
Mobile: (92110) 13755

bf.M;k dks Hkkjr cukvks

India be made Bharat
& lUrks"k dqekj 'kekZ &
1- Hkkjr Lora= gqvk] turk ughaA 2- ukSdj'kkgh ekfyd cuh jghA
lÙkk dsUnzhd`r jgh] xzke jgk oghaAA turk çtk jgh] ukxfjd u cuhA
3- vusdksa iapo"khZ; ;kstuk;sa xqtj xbZA
xjhch Hkq[kcjh vkcknh c<+rh jghAA
4- uxjksa esa dqN çxkfr vkbZA 5- Hkkjr daxky gqvkA
lkFk esa >ksiMiêh ykbZAA oS'ohdj.k djus dks etcwj gqvkAA
6- oS'ohdj.k v'yhy vehjh lkFk vR;ar xjhch yk;kA
O;kikj Hkz"Vkpkj o ty ladV Hkh Nk;kAA
7- ;g dSlk fodkl gS\ 8- ;g fQjaxh Hkwr nqf"kr yksdra= dk deky gSA
ftldh cqfu;kn 'kks"k.k vkSj Hkz"Vkpkj gSAA og fons'kh jkt ls Hkh csbZeku gSAA
9- vkvksa ge feydj ladYi djsa %
jk{kl jkt lekIr djksaA xzke Lojkt gekjk vf/kdkj A
xka/kh th dks ;kn djksaAA tuer laxzg mldk }kjAA
10- ;g dSlk /keZladV gS\ tkxksa Hkkjrokfl;ksa tkxksa] Hkkjr ekrk dks uXu gksus ls cPkkvksA
mlds oL= taxy] ty o feêh mls iqu% igukvkasAA
11- vkvks vkt ge chM+k mBk,
bf.M;k dks Hkkjr cuk,A Hkkjr esa [kq'kgkyh] fo'o esa çse QSyk,AA

Managing Trustee: SK Sharma

111/9-Z, Kishangarh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110070, India. Tel.: 91 (11) 2613-4103, 2689-0380, Res.: 2647-1516,
Fax : 2613-0817 Email: peoplefirst@devalt.org
Visit our website: www.peoplefirstindia.org for more information or downloding this document.

7
 Hkxoku ,d] uke vusd
God One, Name Many
lUrks"k dqekj 'kekZ &
1- rw gh jkeA 2- rw gh eksfttA 3- rw gh lwQh;ksa ds lkabZA
rq gh d`".kA rw gh cq)A rq gh bZalkA rw gh eksgEenA rq gh flD[kksa ds xq:A rw gh cgkbZmYykA
rw gh egkchjAA rw gh tksgjk"VªAA rw gh xka/khAA
4- rsjk lans'k gS çseA
rw gS Hkkjr dk vkse] eqlyeku dk vkehu] bZlkbZ dk vehu
tc tc v/keZ c<+rk gS] rw vkrk gSAA
5- rw gh eafnj esa] efLtn esa] fxjtk esaA 6- rw gh i'kqi{kh esa] feêh] ty ou esaA
rw gh lc ds fnyksa esaAA leÙkk yksdra= rw gh lc ds fnyksa esaAA
dUs n
jkT; z
k
fty

dsUnz] jkT;] ftyk

lc xzke dh lsok esa

7- tc Hkxoku gS ,d] rks dkgs djs erHksnA

tkxksa /keZ ds j{kdksa] tkxksa] lc /keksZa dk djks lEekuA
jke jkt gh gS xzke LojktA tc jkt djsxk xzke] Hkkjr cusxk egkuA

P eople firsT
instituing

Managing Trustee: SK Sharma

good governance

111/9-Z, Kishangarh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110070, India. Tel.: 91 (11) 2613-4103, 2689-0380, Res.: 2647-1516,
Fax : 2613-0817 Email: peoplefirst@devalt.org
Visit our website: www.peoplefirstindia.org for more information or downloding this document.

Hkkjr jgs lnSo d`f"k ç/kku ns'k

& larks"k dqekj 'kekZ &

1- Hkkjr ds gjs Hkjs [ksr nsrs Fks lan's kA 2- tc [kfygku esa vkrk Fkk vUuA 3- tc ckny xjtrs Fks fpfM+;k,a pgdrh FkhaA
lfn;ksa ls jgk Hkkjr d`f"k ç/kku ns'kAA mTtoy gksrk Fkk lc dk euAA ;qo&;qorh çse trkrs FksAA
4- fQjaxh jkt vk;k dysDVj dks ekfyd cuk;kA 5- f'k{kk ysus x, xk¡/khth baXySaMA 6- okil vk, iguh /kksrh] mBkbZ ykBhA
xzke iapk;rksa dk guu fd;kAA Hkkjr ds xzkeksa esa jgk mudk euAA çkjEHk dh ;k=k xzkeksa dhAA

7- nq%[kh gq, xk¡/kh ns[k nqnZ'kk xzkeksa dhA 8- tc vktknh dk le; vk;kA
fQjaxh jkt dks nh pqukSrhAA fgalk us vfgalk dks fu'kkuk cuk;kA

9- Hkkjr rks vktkn gqvkA 10- vkcknh vkSj uxj c<+rs x,A 11- xzkeksa dks ck¡/kk yky Mksjs esaA
xzke xqyke jgkA xzkeksa dh Hkwfe gM+irs x,AA çkphu bekjrksa dks tdM+k xanxh esAa A

12- vkvks vkt ge chM+k mBk,¡A

xzkeksa dks Lojkt fnyk,¡
Hkkjr esa [kq'kgkyh] fo'o esa çse QSyk,¡AA

8
 Enemies of Peace
Mohan Singh in his book “Enemies of peace”

observes:
“Religion blacks out the spiritual man and
nationality blacks out the social man.

So down with religion and down with nationality!

This is he observes going to be the slogan of
every man – sooner than later.

Nationality, he protested, was a base, mean

glorification of geographical factors – a matter
of climate, dress, diet and language. Such
thought processes torpedo the essential unity
of man and rockets the possessive instincts
behind the national patriotic emotion.

Publishers: Atma Ram & Sons, Kashmiri Gate

Delhi, 1947

9
 Foreword
Prof. Shriman Narayan, a devotee of Gandhi, approached him and sought
his permission to write a book based on Gandhi’s vision of democracy.
Titled “Gandhian Constitution for Free India” the book was published by
Kitabistan Allahabad in 1946. People First has edited, annotated and
republished it on its website. Gandhi in his foreword to the book wrote on
November 30, 1945, “Perhaps the expression Gandhian Constitution is not
a befitting title but may be accepted as a convenient one. All I am able to
say is that the book contains nothing inconsistent with what I would like to
stand for. However if I were to commit myself to every word appearing in
these pages, I might as well write it myself but I do not have the time”.
Social philosophers have since ages been debating on what is the objective
of the State. The citations below are from Prof. Shriman Narayan’s book.

Aristotle was one of the early thinkers to emphasise that the State existed
to enable the individual to realise the highest life of which he is capable.
Plato regarded the state as a macrocosm in which the individual could find
his proper space and perform the duties he was best befitted for. Hobbes
said that the purpose of the State was to maintain order and protect the right
of property. To Locke, the end of the State was the preservation of lives,
liberties and estates. Rousseau regarded the State as a social contract to
fulfil the general will. Hegel revived the Greek theory that the State was the
greatest reality. He wrote, “The existence of the State is the movement of
God in the world”. Bentham maintained that the State existed to secure
the greatest good to the largest number. To Herbert Spencer the state
was a joint stock company for mutual assurance. John Stuart Mill
passionately advocated the liberty of the individual as the sacred duty of the
state. Abraham Lincoln defined democracy as ‘government of the people,
by the people, for the people’. To Bernard Shaw the aim of the state ought
to be the greatest available welfare for the whole population and not for a
class. He observed “There are no democracies in the West. They are only
rank plutocracies, now fascist to the tip”. He quipped, “Abraham Lincoln’s
definition of democracy is a good cliché but conveys nothing”. John Stuart
Mill passionately advocated the liberty of the individual as the sacred duty
of the state. Karl Marx expected the state to wither away after establishing
a classless society.

Thomas Jefferson the author of the US Constitution observed, “I know of no

safe repository of the ultimate authority of society but the people themselves”,
indeed a powerful statement. Prof. Toynbee lamented, “The present acquisitive
society is the root cause of all our economic and political malice. Capitalism
can afford to be liberal, suave and sweet so long as its pockets are not touched.

10
It offers social reforms and political freedom to the masses but upon the tacit
understanding that political power shall not be utilised to cut at the very root of
the capitalist system. The privileged classes continue to play the piper so long
as the common people agree to call their tunes. As soon as its existence is
jeopardised, capitalism at once throws off the velvet glove that conceals the iron
fist and does not hesitate to employ the forces of leonine violence to preserve its
past glory and present luxuries”. Prof. Laski wrote “Fascism is the epitaph
upon those forces of privileges which seek to imprison the future by defending
an obsolete past with violence — it is capitalist democracy turned at bay. There
is indeed an inherent contradiction, he observes, between capitalism and
democracy. In a capitalist society the motive to production is profit to owner of
the instruments of production. In democracy, the citizen seeks by the use of
his political power, to increase the material wellbeing at his disposal”.

Indian political thought is contained mainly in Ramayana, Mahabharat,

Smiritis, Kautalaya’s Arthashastra, and Shukracharya’s Nitisara. These
scriptures essentially highlight that the Dharma of the State is to allow every
local entity that is village and city coordinated by the janpad (district) to
govern itself and demand not more than one sixth of local revenues for higher
level functions and coordination. Such true democracy symbolised in Ram
Raj, rule of the epic monarch Ram, was articulated by Gandhi as village
republics. The Raj Guru oversees that the monarch does not violate his
Dharma. Citing these sources, Prof. Shriman Narayan observes, “India may
be regarded as the ancient laboratory of democratic governance”.

According to the Author, democracy can be best defined as “how the

sovereign people would like a nation to be governed”. Given the choice, the
vast majority common people will retain resources at the local level to handle
all local matters such as administration of justice, police, education,
healthcare, land, water systems and forests, and devolve a fraction of their
revenues, one sixth according to Hindu scriptures, to the state for higher
level functions and coordination, but not to interfere in local matters. Gandhi
advocated such truly egalitarian democracy. He was totally opposed to
unbridled capitalism. .
.

Santosh K. Sharma
Managing Trustee, People First

11
 Gandhi : All men are brothers
1. Religion & Truth: By religion I do not mean formal religion but that
which underlies all religions - that which brings us face to face with our
maker.
2 Means & Ends: The creator has given us control over means, none over
ends. Realisation of the goal is in exact proportion to that of means.

3. Ways of Non-violence: Ahimsa and truth are so intertwined that it is

practically impossible to disentangle and separate them. They are like
two sides of a coin.

4. Self Discipline: Civilisation in real sense consists not in multiplication

but in the deliberate and voluntary restriction of wants.
5. Internal Peace: I do not believe that an individual may gain spiritually
and those that surround him suffer. I believe in advaita – the essential
unity of man.
6. Man and nature: I do not draw any distinction between economics and
ethics. Economics that hurts the moral well being of all individuals or a
nation, is immoral.
7. Poverty in the midst of plenty: Economics that ignores or disregards
moral values is untrue.
8. Democracy & the People: Democracy is that under which the weakest
should have the same opportunity as the strongest.
9. Education: Real education consists in drawing the best out of ourselves.
What better book can there be than the bonds of humanity.
10. Women: I am firmly of the opinion that India’s salvation depends on the
enlightenment of its women.
11. Miscellaneous: I do not want to foresee the future. I am concerned
with taking care of the present. I have been known as a crank, faddist,
a mad man. Evidently the reputation is well deserved. For wherever I
go, I draw to myself cranks, faddists and mad men.

Source:
“All Men are brothers – Autobiographical reflections of Mahatma Gandhi”
Compiled and edited by Krishna Kripilani with introduction by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan;
First published by Continunimum, First South Asia Edition 2007
Library of Congress number 79-56684; ISBN: 1-8468-4069-4
Author’s remarks: The above analysis is excellent but the title is sexist.
If Gandhi were alive, he would apologize for it.

12
 Contents
Preface
1. Homage
2. State of India and the World
3. India’s Spiritual Heritage
4. The Muslim Rule
5. Rule of the East India Company
6. British Imperial Rule
7. Emergence of Gandhi
8. Cabinet Mission Plan gets aborted
9. Divided India attains Independence
10. China usurps Tibet
11. Independent India adopts a flawed Constitution
12. Indira Gandhi’s Turbulent Period
13. Rajiv Gandhi initiates vital Reforms
14. Improving Urban & Rural Quality
15. Nurturing Social Harmony
16. India’s Imperial Judiciary
17. Reforms suiting tropical Ecology and/or Productivity
18. One World Education & Temples of Dharma
19. India leaves Bharat behind
20. The fake Economic Boom
21. Sovereign Rights Commission, a unique innovation
22. Reunification of India, Pakistan & Bangladesh
23. Key provisions in the proposed Constitution.
24. Egalitarian Democracy alone can curb Global Warming.
25. Experiences of the Author as a Civil Servant

Website Links:
(1) Good governance website of People First: www.peoplefirstindia.org.
(2) Sustainable development & Global Warming website of Development
Alternatives: www.devalt.org.

13
 Preface

When the Author completed his term as an officer of the Indian Administrative
Service in 1991, Dr Ashok Khosla a scientist, and Chairman Development
Alternatives, a prominent civil society organization that addresses issues of
sustainable development, invited him to join Development Alternatives as
Senior Adviser. Both of us felt that good governance had become a critical
need, and decided to institute People First, a trust dedicated to instituting
good governance. The Author’s inkling was that there was something
fundamentally flawed in governance as structured in India. Dr Hari Sharan a
person of Indian origin settled in Switzerland used to visit Development
Alternatives as an energy consultant. During informal discussions, he told
the Author that in Switzerland the villages and cities coordinated by cantons
that is districts, controlled local resources to handle all local matters. It
struck the Author that Gandhi was advocating such true democracy, based
on Ram Raj, rule of the Indian epic monarch Ram, articulated by Gandhi as
Gram Swaraj, that is, village republics. Ignoring Gandhi, desire of Nehru,
the first Prime Minister of India, to centralize power led to the partition of
India, traumas of Kashmir and the all round degradation that followed. On
top of it, Nehru imposed Soviet type centralized planning and a controlled
economy thus instituting a mixed economy in a mixed up polity! Such
flawed political and economic systems led to all round social, environmental,
economic and political degradation. Facing bankruptcy in 1991, India opened
its economy to the global market and all political parties are claiming credit
for reforms when it was mere correction of a past blunder. They are however
still wedded to the flawed polity, as it has become a vested interest of all
political parties in self seeking coalition politics fostered by the faulty
Westminster system.

2. Most books on Gandhi deal with the values that Gandhi stood for. This
book not only dwells in depth on Gandhi’s various initiatives, his concept of
true egalitarian democracy and how it got aborted, but also based on original
research, proposes a legitimate, non violent process for instituting true
egalitarian democracy in India and eventually in all nations of the world. It is
hoped that this book will create better awareness about the issues, and
activate the global community such that it sincerely strives to ensure truly
egalitarian democracy in all nation states thus heralding the emergence of a
peace loving sustainable world order based on social justice and equity.

3. The Author has used citations from numerous sources that have been
duly acknowledged but it has not been possible to seek permission. The

14
book is being e-published by People First, a not for profit trust, dedicated to
instituting good governance, on its website: www.peoplefirstindia.org.

August 2008
Santosh K. Sharma,
Managing Trustee, People First

15
 Chapter 1
Homage
1.1 Jawahar Lal Nehru: Nehru was a highly respected leader of India. He
however failed to understand the true spirit of democracy. His desire to
impose on the people a centralised polity based on exploitive colonial
practises led to the partition of India, traumas of Kashmir and the all round
social, environmental, and political degradation witnessed today. Nehru
was an impetuous person who took and imposed decisions not realising
their implications for the nation in the long term. To illustrate, when Indian
forces were driving Pakistan sponsored infiltrators out of Kashmir, he ordered
ceasefire and himself offered plebiscite that has left the Kashmir issue
unresolved till today. As described in the next paragraph Nehru pressurised
Dr BR Ambedkar to draft a constitution based on exploitative colonial laws.
The criticism of Nehru is not personal but professional.

1.2 Dr BR Ambedkar: During debates in the Rajya Sabha on September 3,

1963, Dr Ambedkar on being hackled by followers of Gandhi for drafting a flawed
constitution replied “People keep saying to me, so you are the author of the
Constitution. My answer is that I was a hack. I did what I was told to do much
against my will. If I have the opportunity, I will be the first person to burn it. It will
not do good to any one”. One who does not commit any mistake is a great
person. One who admits having committed a mistake is a greater person. Dr
BR Ambedkar deserves praise for admitting that a blunder had been committed.

1.3 Rajiv Gandhi: In the context of conflicts over claims by the Muslim
community that the site of the Ram Temple in Ayodha was a mosque, its
dwar that is door had been sealed. Opening the dwar, Rajiv Gandhi announced
that he will institute Ram Raj, and initiated the 73rd and 74th constitutional
amendments for local empowerment thus correcting the wrong inflicted by
his grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru on the people of India. He deserves the
gratitude of the nation for it. Assassination of Rajiv has been a great loss to
the nation. After his demise, vested interests of self seeking politicians
have not allowed this constitutional mandate to be properly enforced till
today!

1.4 PA Sangma, then Speaker Lok Sabha, circulated a document of The

Lal Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation headed by Sunil Shastri, and
People First demanding true democracy through the referendum process, in
the Golden Jubilee special session of parliament held in 1997. Vested
interests of politicians evaded discussion on it. Upset by this the Congress
party marginalized PA Sangma and Sunil Shastri for initiating the proposal.

16
1.5 The citizens of Utah State USA once lowered the US national flag at half
mast as protest against certain actions of the federal government, source
website: http://historytogo.utah.gov/hmearlymor.him. We invite persons such
as Actor Sanjay Dutt who created awareness in the nation about the values
that Gandhi stood for through his movie “Lage Raho Munnabhai”, to lead
protest marches with the national flag at half mast, in mourning for (1) children
dying of starvation and farmers committing suicide in villages, and (2) women
being frequently raped in cities, reciting the Author’s lyric “India ko Bharat
banao”, and demanding true democracy as advocated by Gandhi. Such
movements will build pressure on the political system to agree to institute
true democracy though the referendum process.

Santosh K. Sharma
Managing Trustee, People First

17
 Chapter 2
State of India and the World

Section 1: State of India

According to government statistics the population of India has increased
from 320 million at independence to over 1,100 million. Our forest cover has
gone down from 75 to 32 million hectares while wasteland has increased
from 65 to 130 million hectares. Over 400 million people in twenty two
thousand villages do not have adequate safe drinking water. Illiteracy has
increased from 240 million at independence to 400 million, unemployment
from 40 million to 290 million. Malnutrition may make our children below the
poverty line virtual morons. Poverty driven migration from rural areas into
urban centres, often squatting on riverfronts, is exerting immense pressure
on urban services. After the opening of the economy to the global market,
the divide between the rich and the poor is further widening. While the high
and mighty are above criminal justice, with over 30 million cases pending in
various courts and tribunals, the common people hardly have any access to
justice. The number of persons working in government organisations has
grown to astronomical twenty one million, a huge drain on the state exchequer.

Section 2: State of the World

2.1 Foreign Policy, a journal of the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace, Washington, in a study published in The Times of India of August 9,
2005, ranked 60 states in the world being in danger of going over the edge.
Except for Sri Lanka every one of India’s neighbour is a failed or failing state.
Bangladesh is in a critical 17th place, while Pakistan is at 34th along with
Nepal at 35th. Myanmar and Bhutan are 23rd and 26th places respectively,
with Afghanistan in the dangerous category at 11th place. The failed category
index ranks countries on twelve economic, social and political parameters
that include demographic parameters, refugee and displaced persons, group
grievance, human flight, uneven development, economic decline, de-
legitimisation of the state, public services, human rights, security apparatus,
fractionalised elite and external interventions.

2.2 Pakistan is failing on economic, political and military parameters while

Bangladesh remains well in danger levels on numerous criteria. The worry
is not states amassing power but the absence of it! The study argues that
the danger of failing or failed state is now at the centre of global peace. US’s
National Security Strategy of 2002 clearly lays down where the threat lay.
America is threatened less by concurring states than failing ones. The same
assessment is true for India, except its reticent assessments tend to gloss
over the threats that these failing states pose to India’s economy and security.

18
2.3 Failed states, the study observes, export many unsavoury products such
as international terrorism, large-scale immigrants, drugs and weapons. In
South Asia, one can see various scenarios of this problem such as
Bangladesh sinking into Islamic fundamentalism will create the inevitable
pressures in India’s fragile North Eastern states. And Nepal sliding into chaos
sends a large number of immigrants into India creating economic and social
pressures in the border state of India.

2.4 Instability, the study points out, has many faces. While internal conflict
can take virulent forms as in countries like Somalia, Ivory Coast or Afghanistan
where fighting drugs, terrorism, and external intervention makes a deadly
cocktail! In fact, it is only episodes like the blasts in Bangladesh or LTTE’s
killing of a Sri Lankan minister which put the spotlight on such countries, while
the slide into instability in countries such as Saudi Arabia 45th, Egypt 38th,
and even Russia 59th are rarely documented.

2.5 A UN Report published in The Times of India or August 25, 2005 observes
that despite China and India witnessing considerable economic growth, the gap
between the rich and poor remain wide, and in developed countries the income
gap has been specially pronounced in Canada, Britain and the United States.
To reduce the growing inequalities, the report calls for efforts to ensure that
all benefit from an increasingly open global economy promote democracy,
include the marginalised, expand employment opportunities especially for the
youth, and improve social protection programmes. Reducing inequality is also
crucial in preventing conflicts and violence. Despite unprecedented growth
especially in Asia, 20 per cent of the world population controls 80 per cent of
the global wealth, inequalities in income and opportunities persist, and in
many cases are getting worse. The report laments that the commitment by
world leaders at the 1995 UN Social Summit in Copenhagen to close the
gap between the wealthy and the poor is fading. It warns that unless all
people enjoy better living conditions and social justice, communities,
countries and regions remain vulnerable to social, political and economic
upheaval.

2.6 The UN Human Development Report 2005 published in The Times of

India September 8, 2005 observes “If aid and trade are the two key elements in
the global strategy aimed at meeting the UN millennium goals, there is
much that ails both. The developed world is contributing too little of one,
while distorting the other to its advantage and against the interests of the
developing countries. The above issues, according to the Author, are generic
and endemic and need immediate attention.

19
 Chapter 3
India’s Spiritual Heritage
3.1 Dharma, a fundamental life concept of Indian origin said to be wider
than religion, is described in the Oxford English Dictionary as “The Eternal
law of the Universe”. It has two components. The first is rituals and practices
for self development as in all faiths but with the difference that while most
tribal faiths were polytheistic in that they believe in many gods, and faiths
such as Christianity and Islam are monotheistic in that they believe in one
god and one prophet, Dharma is henotheistic in that it believes in various
manifestations of the only super-conscious. As a consequence, Dharma
respects all faiths, sarva panth sambhaav, and does not proselytise. This is
often mischievously misconstrued as implying that a person can be Hindu
only by birth, when it truly means that a person has merely to say that he or
she is a Hindu to be one!

3.2 The other component of Dharma is rights and duties of various

functionaries of society such as the state, business, husband, wife, teacher
and the youth. The Dharma of the state and business determine the ideology
that is system of governance. According to Hindu scriptures such as various
Smritis repeated in the Mahabharata, the Dharma of the state is to allow
every local entity that is village and city coordinated by the district (janpad),
to govern itself and demand not more than one-sixth of local revenues for
higher level functions and coordination. Controlling five-sixth of local revenues,
local governments prosper, the one-sixth of the state shoots up and it too
will become prosperous! This component of Dharma is truly an expression
of spirituality. Spirituality is not sitting in meditation as is generally believed.
Spirituality is truly the relationship of the individual to society, other life forms
and the environment. Thus while religion is a personal matter, spirituality is
a societal issue! When local communities allot land to business, they may
not allow palatial houses, more than two cars, personal aircraft and
ostentatious weddings to businesses thus leaving them no choice but to
use the wealth generated for expansion and/or philanthropy. This nurtures
an egalitarian economic system, truly capitalism with a human face, in which
all have equal social, environmental, economic and political rights and
opportunities. In such true democracy, every adult has the right to
employment, every child opportunity for education.

3.3 Gandhi’s devotee, leading industrialist Ghanshyam Das Birla followed

such business ethics. The Author had the privilege of meeting Shri GD Birla
when he was Divisional Commissioner, Ujjain during 1997-80. Shri Birla
kept two dhotis and two kurtas, himself washed one and wore the other! He

20
built numerous temples of worship and temples of learning that is universities
and colleges, and left behind a model for other industrialists to emulate. As
stated earlier, such business ethics nurture an egalitarian economic system,
currently practised in a few nations such as Switzerland, Holland and
Scandinavian countries.

3.4 In ancient India, Chakravarti that is omnipotent monarchs such as Ram

monitored such true egalitarian democracy in neighbouring kingdoms through
a religious horse ceremony “Ashwa Medha Yajna”. A decorated horse followed
at some distance by Ram’s army traversed neighbouring kingdoms requesting
their king to govern according to Dharma, that is, demand not more than one
sixth of local revenues. If a king captured the horse conveying that he did
not accept the proposal, Ram’s army would defeat him and Ram would
crown another warrior of that kingdom as its king who agreed to demand not
more than one-sixth! Such omnipotent monarchs emerged from time to
time in different parts of India monitoring democracy in neighbouring kingdoms
thus making Bharat Akhand, that is one nation whereas Europe was mostly
divided during that period. India, not Britain, is truly the mother of democracy.

3.5 Over India’s long civilization some aberrations crept into its social fabric.
The priesthood and warriors connived to make castes originally based on
profession, such as Smiths and Carpenters in the West, as being based on
birth and demeaned one as untouchable. Gandhi’s conviction was that
once local communities are empowered, such social aberrations would
gradually disappear. When India attained independence, desire of Jawahar
Lal Nehru to centralize power led to the Partition of India, the traumas of
Kashmir and the all round degradation witness today. The ICS designed by
the British to rule over the people, renamed as IAS was perpetuated after
independence, so were Indian Police and Forest Services. Thus while India
became independent, its people remain subjects in an exploitative political
system. We need to rebuild India on the foundation of its rich spiritual ethos.

21
 Chapter 4
The Muslim Rule
4.1 India’s tradition of empowered local communities made it very rich. Its
wealth attracted invasions. As early as the eighth century, Arab explorers
monopolized the seas from the Persian Gulf to the coast of China. From
India’s shores they took ivory, aromatic wood, gold and rare spices, but left
a new religion. The concept of one supreme soul and Mohammed his prophet,
gained a permanent foothold in India, particularly in the coastal regions.
Muslims eventually became India’s largest minority group, and their political
influence has remained to the present times. The tough, sword-swinging
Afghans were the first followers of Mohammed to rule India.

4.2 After some Muslim dynasties such as Tughlak and Lodhi, around 1000 AD
Mughal king Babar from Central Asia invaded India and founded a dynasty that
lasted for 700 years. The Mughal rulers did not dislodge India’s tiny village
republics since they found it convenient to collect the land tax through them.
Extravagance such as the Taj Mahal and herds of bejeweled elephants cost
money, so the greedy Kings of India showed keen interest in Portuguese, French,
Dutch and British traders, who, in turn, cast hungry glances at Mughal treasures.
All this resulted in the weakening of the Mughal Empire.

4.3 On the positive side, the interface of Hinduism and Islam led to the
emergence of a composite culture of language, poetry, and Sufi mysticism,
revered by both communities. The Hindus and Muslims participated in each
other’s religious festivals and helped one another in need. Mughal emperor
Akbar married a Hindu princess thus winning the goodwill of Hindus. Later
a bigoted Mughal emperor Aurangzeb indulged in state sponsored conversion
of Hindus to Islam and desecrating Hindu places of worship. This invoked
hatred in the Hindu community against him. The Hindu community in Punjab
dedicated their eldest son to become Sikh warriors for resisting such
conversions. Swami Dayanand challenged Aurangzeb to convert him, and
to reverse conversions he instituted Aryasamaj, a wing of Hinduism, that
offers a ceremony for re-conversion to Hinduism. Aurangzeb’s bigotry divided
the Hindus and Muslims. This led to revolts in various parts of the empire
and weakened the Mughal rule. To crush such revolts Aurangzeb had to
further enlarge his army. To meet its expenses he was forced to increase
the land tax. This created further dissatisfaction in the people and after
some weak kings, led to the downfall of the Mughal Empire.

22
 Chapter 5
Rule of the East India Company
5.1 With the weakening of the Mughal Rule, the Europeans got a foothold in
India. British traders instituted the East India Company on December 31,
1600 with the objective of establishing trade with India. The British combined
foresight with avarice. They planned their future as they watched the decline of
the Mughal Empire. Its agents noted that the Hindus traditionally accepted
fate, but Muslim zealots revolted often at the slightest provocation. Slowly
but surely through manipulation of the warring kings and feudal lords the
British established themselves on the Indian shores.

5.2 From the fateful moment when the British East India Company raised the
Union Jack over India in 1757, the Raj viewed the Muslims as the naughty boys
of India. The British assumed that any dissent would come from India’s pockets
of Islam, and like their Mughal predecessors, began a general policy of oppressing
and alienating the Muslims. Like the Arabs who gave the Muslims their faith,
Indian Muslims reacted with fanatical prejudice towards anything foreign
including ethnically different Muslims. In 1863, British solders halted a
vicious Islamic insurrection called the Wahabi Revolt. After they were crushed,
the Muslims retreated into their private communities and avoided the British.
As a consequence, they rarely participated in the British military or held
government jobs. They never exposed their children to British schools, but
sent them to study under the learned mullahs, or holy men.

5.3 On the same logic, the British and Hindus forged closer ties. The Hindus
seemed open minded about their occidental rulers. This apparent passivity
resulted from their previous exposure to foreign occupation. Before the
Muslims arrived, the Hindus viewed themselves as totally unique and pure in
relation to the barbarity of the outside world. This doctrine of elitism, relatively
common amongst Asian people, could have been at the heart of a nationalist
movement. As a result Hindus remained highly susceptible to British influence.
As the Hindus watched the English build India into a mercantile political complex,
they discovered how these western foreigners succeeded where the Mughals
had blundered.

5.4 The East India Company negotiated the first trade agreement with the Mughal
Empire in 1618 and established its offices in Fort Saint George in Madras in
1639. It became a permanent joint stock corporation in 1657 and established a
new base in Calcutta in 1690. The British parliament awarded monopoly of Asia
trade to it in 1698. It received comprehensive trade privileges in Mughal India in
1717. The Company’s chief, Robert Clive won siege of Arcot in 1752. The

23
Nawab of Bengal captured Calcutta. The ‘black hole’ incident in which many
people lost their lives took place in 1756. The East India Company recaptured
Calcutta in 1757 by defeating the Nawab Siraj-ud-Dowlah at Plassey. It also
defeated an alliance of Mughals, Bengal and Awadh in 1764. Robert Clive
acquired the management of the Bengal treasury for the East India Company in
1765. East India Company’s shares reached their peak in 1769. Famine hit
Bengal in 1770 in which almost ten million people died of starvation. The East
India Company appealed to British government for financial assistance in 1772.
The British government promulgated a Regulating Act in 1773 to reform
governance of the Company and made Warren Hastings the first Governor General
of India. The British government also promulgated the Tea Act in 1773 to
encourage sale of East India Company tea in Americas. American patriots
dumped the tea of the East India Company in Boston harbour that came to be
known as the Boston Tea Party.

5.5 Sir Charles Metcalfe, a Governor General of the East India Company, in
his famous minute recorded in 1830 observed, “The village communities in
India are little republics, having nearly everything that they want within
themselves, each one forming a separate state in itself. They seem to last
where nothing else lasts. They have contributed to the preservation of the
people through all the revolutions and changes they have suffered, and to
their happiness and enjoyment of independence. I wish therefore that the
village communities may never be disturbed and dread everything that has a
tendency to break them up”. This shows that the Muslim rule did not dislodge
India’s village republics as it found it convenient to govern through them.
The greed of the East India Company led to the imposition of the District
Collector for collecting land revenue, often exploitative. It thus gave a deathblow
to India’s tiny village republics. The abuse got perpetrated during the British
rule, and ironically even in independent India.

5.6 Warren Hastings then Governor General of the East India Company sent a
shipment of opium to China in 1781. The British government passed the
William Pit’s India Act in 1784 increasing state power over the East India
Company. The British government started impeachment trial of Warren Hastings
in 1788. He was acquitted in 1795. The Parliament ended the Company’s
commercial operations in 1833, but retained it as the territorial administrator
of India. The First War of Independence, initiated through a mutiny in the army
broke out in 1857 in northern India. The British parliament replaced the Company
rule by direct British rule in India in 1858. The East India Company was
wound up in 1861.

5.7 Lord Macaulay was sent by the British Parliament to advise on

introducing English education in India. In his written address to the British

24
Parliament on February 2, 1835, he said, “I have travelled across the length
and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is
a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values,
people of such calibre, that I do not think that we would ever conquer this
country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her
cultural and spiritual heritage, and therefore I propose that we replace her
old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all
that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose
their self esteem, their native self culture and will become what we want them,
a truly dominated nation”. His strategy worked! Most English educated
Indians called “Macaulay’s children” became elitist and regarded the Hindi
speaking common people as inferior.

5.8 The Afghan War: In 1841, the then Governor General of the East India
Company wanted to expand its rule in Afghanistan. The Indian solders in the
British army refused to fight on the ground that attacking the tough Afghans
would mean sure death. The Governor General nevertheless assisted by British
soldiers attacked Afghanistan on January 13, 1842. The Afghans massacred
the British solders in Kabul leaving one translator to go back and warn the East
India Company not to dare attack again. The Afghan War cost the East India
Company over 1500 billion pounds making it virtually bankrupt so much so that
it decided to leave India for ever. At this juncture some lackeys of the Company
drew attention of its executives to the statement of Sir Charles Metcalf and
explained that India’s real wealth was not with its rulers but with its village
republics. Taking the cue, the East India Company appointed district collectors
to collect land tax from the panchayats thus giving a deathblow to India’s village
republics. To optimise its profit, the East India Company was also abusing
skilled craftsmen and unskilled labour by giving them exceptionally low wages.
Such abuses led to widespread unrest and resentment amongst the people. It
became the main provocation for the First War of Independence in 1857, called
mutiny by the British. After the bloodshed in which many British officers and
their families got killed, British imperialism established its rule.

25
 Chapter 6
British Imperial Rule
6.1 The Europeans did not colonise India as they did South Africa, North and
Latin America and Australia where they virtually destroyed local cultures, a
permanent black spot in their history. The reason for not colonising India apparently
is that their white skin could not bear India’s tropical climate. The British ruled
over India as an imperial power. Calling it colonial rule is technically incorrect,
but since it is commonly in vogue, it is being used in this study. The Europeans
colonised Goa and Pondicherry in India, Australia and Americas and parts of
Africa where the climate suited their white skin.

6.2 Adopting the policy of “divide and rule”, the British created rift between
the Hindu and Muslim communities. They also manipulated the princely
states by granting privileges under the British rule to them. As envisioned
by Lord Macaulay, the British furthered English education through convents
of Christian missionaries with the twin objective of (1) inculcating attitude in
the English educated that they were superior to those speaking native
languages, and (2) converting the poor to Christianity. The British gradually
replaced the British ICS officers by Indian ICS officers often called ‘brown
sahibs’ who as Lord Macaulay had prophesised started not only thinking
and behaving like the British but also praising the British rule. The British
perpetuated the practise introduced by the East India Company of usurping
the land, water systems and forests from the panchayats and municipalities,
and appointing district collectors to levy taxes thus further impoverishing
them. The British got allegiance from the princely states, landowners, and
businessmen by granting honours, privileges and titles such as Rai Sahib
and Khan Bahadur. Thus fortified, British imperialism ruled over India for
nearly a century. Eminent British Writer Pearl Buck observed, “Britain is a
democracy fighting for its empire. Nothing can be more complex than this
phenomenon in history because democracy and imperialism are basically
incompatible”.

6.3 The Second World War: The Second World War began in September
1939. It was a war of ambition and denials. Denied trade in the East, Hitler
wanted Germany to dominate Europe and reduce Poland and the USSR to
vassal states. Hirohito of Japan sought dominion over China, South Asia
and South East Asia. The League of Nations primarily represented by Britain
and France attempted to moderate conflicts but as demands increased
appeasement was gradually replaced by denial. The result was a series of
wars as Japan, Italy and Germany resorted to force to secure their national
ambitions. Italy invaded Abyssinia in October 1935. Japan annexed Manchuria

26
in September 1931 followed by invasion of China in July 1937. The German
invasion of Poland in September 1939 triggered a chain reaction of alliances
that engulfed six of the seven continents of the world.

6.3 The ambitious were Germany, Japan and Italy called the Axis powers.
The Allies were Britain, France, Poland and the Soviet Union. USA was later
dragged into it by Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbour. Hitler’s Germany wished
to dominate central Europe and to reduce Poland and the Soviet Union to
the status of vassal states. Japan sought dominance over China and South
East Asia. Mussolini’s Italy coveted the Balkans and the Mediterranean region
to revive the glories of ancient Rome. Japan was the first nation to move beyond
diplomacy to war with the annexation of Manchuria in September 1931,
followed by invasion of China in July 1937. Italy also defied world opinion with
the invasion of Abyssinia in October 1935. Both wars were major acts of
aggression but remained isolated regional conflicts. The German invasion of
Poland in September 1939 triggered a chain of actions and alliances that
ultimately engulfed six of the World’s seven continents. In October 1940
Germany, Japan and Italy signed a pact that became to be known as the
Axis powers. Before the month was over Poland lay prostrate under German
arms.

6.4 Britain assured the Indian leaders that when the war ended they would
restore independence to India. Subhash Chandra Bose a dedicated freedom
fighter from Bengal, doubting the assurances of the British, formed the Indian
National Army and established a joint front in the Second World War with the
Axis powers. France could not sustain German air strikes and surrendered.
Hitler attacked the Soviet Union and almost captured Moscow but the Russian
winter forced him to retreat. Japan attacked Pearl Harbour thereby dragging
USA in the war. The Indian National Army fought bravely but lost for want of
logistic support from its allies. Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose as he is
usually called is believed to have died in the war. He left behind a wife and
a child in Germany. Detonation of two atom bombs by USA on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki in Japan brought the Second World War to an end in August
1945. British and Indian leaders commenced consultations for independence
to India.

27
 Chapter 7
Emergence of Gandhi

7.1 Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born in 1869 in Porbundar Gujarat,

the last offspring of Karamchand and Putlibai Gandhi. Like his father,
Karamchand was chief administrator of the princely state of Porbundar. Like
his father, Mohandas was married at the age of thirteen to Kasturba of his
age. As was the practice then in well to do families, Mohandas left for
England for studying law after he solemnly swore that while in England he
would abjure meat, liquor and women. He became a father of a boy at the
age of nineteen. Three years later he returned as a Barrister, speaking of
‘dear London’ and friends he had left behind. In his autobiography Gandhi
writes of a spiritual interest that quickened in him while in London. Indian
self-respect was tugging at him. On returning to India in the summer of 1891
he learnt of the demise of his mother. Lack of success in Bombay’s
courtrooms was a second shock. Some months later came the third shock.
Gandhi was forcibly removed from the Rajkot office of the British political
agent in Kathiawar.

7.2 Gandhi in South Africa: In the

circumstances, Gandhi was only too glad to
accept an offer of legal work in South Africa
from an Indian firm in Porbundur doing
business there. South Africa where he finally
spent 21 years, 1893 to 1914, charged him
spiritually. There he spoke out, in the court
room and outside, against the discrimination
faced by the multilingual, multi-religious Indian
community of indentured workers, traders and
clerks, organised the community, formed the
Natal Indian congress, started a newsletter Conscience keeper
‘Indian Opinion’, founded his earliest ashrams of the Nation
in Natal and Transvaal, introduced with the help o f
Leo Tolstoy and John Ruskin the idea of bread labour, and discovered a way
of rebellion through “satyagraha” in which the freedom fighters preferred
accepting suffering to inflicting it. A positive result of the maltreatment meted
out to him and other Indians in South Africa, was that it sharpened his
understanding of the misery of India’s poor and low castes. In 1906, in the
hills and valleys of the Zulu country, Gandhi resolved in favour of poverty and
chastity, and also to widen almost indefinitely the meaning of family to include,
if possible, all of India.

28
7.3 During visits to India in 1896, 1901 and 1902 he travelled extensively,
acquainted leading personalities with the plight and struggles of their
compatriots in South Africa, and in Calcutta attended a session of the Indian
National Congress that had been founded in 1885. By 1909 he became well
known in India. Gopal Krishna Gokhale speaks of Gandhi in extraordinary
terms. In 1910 there was talk of making Gandhi the President of the Indian
National Congress. He declined.

7.4 Gandhi’s manifesto in defence of civilisation, unity and liberty, “Hind Swaraj”,
that advocated non-violent struggle as the way suited to India’s genius and
censured the Western civilisation as violent and materialistic, was published in
1909-10. The years between 1909 and 1914 saw satyagraha campaigns in
South Africa in which virtually every section of the Indian community, women
and men participated, and which resulted in prison terms for Gandhi and hundreds
of his colleagues. They also saw encounters between Gandhi and the South
African leader Jan Smuts, and significant partial victories for the Indian community.
The India to which Gandhi returned in January 1915 was one from which Britain
was seeking recruits for the First World War that was then raging. It was also
an India resentful of the alien rule. But the greatest problem facing Gandhi was
the distrust of fellow Indians, a sentiment equally strong and pervasive. India
was crippled by a community treated as untouchable, religious, caste and
class divide, each soliciting the Raj’s intervention in its favour and against its
rivals.

7.5 Bengal produced some highly committed leaders for the freedom struggle,
notably Aurobindo Ghosh and much younger to him Subhash Chanda Bose,
both not opposed to violence. Aurobindo first mobilised freedom fighters
using violent methods. He later became a saint and established an ashram,
in French Pondicherry in South India on India’s eastern seacoast. Some of
his supporters went to meet him and said, “Master, you have become a
saint. The police keep hounding us, and we are separated from our families.
Kindly advise us what we may do”. Aurobindo replied, “A person named Gandhi
is adopting peaceful methods. Go and meet him”. It was a saintly advice.

7.6 Until 1919-20, Gandhi sought Indian freedom within the British Empire.
In his autobiography he claimed that he hardly knew “anybody to cherish
such loyalty as I did for the Empire”. He learnt the tune of ‘God save the
Queen’, always joined in its singing and taught it to his children. By summer
of 1920 he became the Empire’s most resolute enemy. Some researchers
such as John Wright, author of the Book “Indian Summer”, have observed
that Gandhi was initially a firm supporter of the British rule. Not true. The
truth is that it was a strategic initiative of the highly creative mind of Gandhi.

29
7.7 Rulers of princely states, landlords with large holdings, untouchables
and Muslim leaders were mostly wary of Indian independence. They feared
it would be rule by the classes, castes or communities inimical to their
interests. If the groups susceptible to such fears combined their resources
and numbers, they were capable of blocking a freedom movement. Gandhi
prevented such a unity by allaying the fears of rulers and landlords, persuading
the untouchables that Hindu society was changing, and convincing some
Muslims for all time and most of them for a while that Indian freedom would
not mean Hindu Raj. He was aided in his efforts by his Spartan and ascetic
lifestyle, identification with all Indians, systemic condemnation of outdated
notions such as untouchables, high and low castes, stress on non violence,
and readiness to raise his voice against the British Raj. Also at work was
Gandhi’s conviction to demonstrate non-violence to the world, a self confidence
revealed in the statement “We have problems that would baffle any statesman,
we have problems that other nations have not to tackle. But they do not
baffle me” made by him in London in 1931.

7.8 Satyagrahas: Gandhi’s persistence in identifying and tackling Indian,

and not just British weaknesses, and his campaigning for the underdog and
his needs, won the attention of the world. Gandhi conducted Satyagrahas
meaning “Humble request for Truth” initially in regard to (1) in defence of indigo
growing peasants in north Bihar in 1917, (2) on behalf of textile workers of
Bihar in 1918, (3) on behalf of textile workers of Kehda district of Gujarat
also in 1918, and (4) against all India curbs on expression embodied in the
Rowlatt Act of that year in 1919. These events brought Gandhi to the centre
stage of Indian politics. In 1920 Muslim resentment against what seemed
to be betrayal of a British promise in relation to Turkey flared up just when,
to the outrage of many, the Raj seemed to be whitewashing offences that
were related to the Jalianwalla Bagh killing of the previous year. Gandhi
took the opportunity to launch a nationwide struggle against the Raj in which
unprecedented number of people of all backgrounds and regions took part.

7.9 From 1920 onwards Gandhi was in many ways the unquestioned leader of
the Congress and of India. The salt march of 1930 was another milestone that
resulted in a pact between the Viceroy, Lord Irwin, and Gandhi. It underscored
the right Gandhi had earned to speak for India. But objections to this right
voiced by Muslim bodies and by Dr BR Ambedkar on behalf of untouchables
revealed India’s cracks and complexities. But prospects of a transfer of power
to Congress seemed far in 1937 when following elections to provincial legislatures
most provincial governments came under its control.

30
 Chapter 8
Nehru Family comes in limelight
8.1 Motilal Nehru, father of Jawaharlal Nehru, was raised by his elder brother
Nandlal and like his brother was trained as a lawyer. When Nandlal died Motilal
assumed responsibility as head of the family and moved from Kashmir to
Delhi and then to Allahabad in Central India where he developed a brilliant
legal career and prospered both professionally and personally. He soon became
one of the wealthiest and the most socially prominent citizen in the town.
Fortune also smiled on him when his first child, a son named Jawaharlal
was born on November 14, 1889. In 1900 Motilal moved his family to a huge
English mansion in Civil Lines and named it Anand Bhawan. By the time
Jawarharlal was sent in 1905 to a public school in Harrow, England, he had
two sisters. All the children had British style upbringing. Jawaharlal obeyed
his father’s wishes and endured a near exile for seven years while he was
educated in England. In London he was vaguely attracted to Fabians and
socialistic ideas and to political movements of the day. He entered the legal
profession without demur.

8.2 By the time he returned to India in 1912, England had transformed

him. He received a letter from his father that a twelve-year old beautiful girl
named Kamala Kaul would be his wife. On his return to India Kamala and
he were married on February 8, 1916. Historical and political imperatives
determined and shaped the lives of Jawaharlal and Kamala. On October 5,
1917 Annie Besant, founder of the Indian Home Rule League, was released
from prison and made a visit to Allahabad. Jawaharlal Nehru’s daughter
Indira was born on November 19, 1917. On March 18, 1919, The British
Rowlatt Act that provided for wartime powers of arrest and detention without
trial was extended. That night Gandhi drew the plan of protesting against
this unjust and repressive act through a countywide strike, fasting and prayer.
A peaceful demonstration in Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar on April 13 was
met by ammunition fired by soldiers on unarmed protesters under orders of
General Dyer. It converted Motilal Nehru to Gandhi’s peaceful non-violent
movement, satyagraha. The increasing involvement of the Nehru family in
satyagraha did not go unnoticed by the British.

8.3 No part of Jawaharlal Nehru’s political philosophy has evoked sharper

controversies, than his avowed faith in socialism. In his presidential address
to the Lahore Congress in December 1929 when he reaffirmed that he was a
socialist, he was regarded a follower of communism. Though Jawaharlal as
a student in Cambridge and London had sampled Fabian literature and
attended Bernard Shaw’s lectures, his enthusiasm for Marxism and the

31
Russian revolution was derived from reading and reflection in jail, and the
visit to Europe in 1926-27 that included a four-day trip to Moscow. It is
significant that one of the aims of the Independence of India League that
Nehru and Subash Bose had founded in 1928, was an economic structure
based on socialism.

8.4 When India attained independence the President of the Indian National
Congress was likely to be elected its first chief executive. Vallabhbhai Patel
was a strong administrator as demonstrated by him later as Union Home
Minister in handling the merger of the princely states in the Indian union.
Some Maharajas demanded privy purses larger than offered. Vallabhbhai
Patel reacted, “I am talking to princes, not beggars”. They relented. The
Nizam of Hyderabad tried to stall the talks as he was considering whether to
join India or Pakistan. Vallabhbhai Patel ordered police action. The Nizam
surrendered. Sardar Vallabbhai Patel is also credited for restoring the ancient
Somnath Temple in Gujarat damaged during the Muslim rule.

8.5 According to Rajmohan Gandhi, Gandhi had been desired as president

because a fight would need a general. Declining the office, Gandhi cited his
lack of energy adding that the battle of the future had to be fought by younger
men and women. Gandhi said, “In my opinion the crown must be worn by
Jawaharlal Nehru. Older men had their innings. Responsibility will mellow and
sober the youth, and prepare them for the burden they must discharge”. Admitting
his intellectual differences with Jawaharlal, Gandhi added “Those who know the
relations that subsist between Jawaharlal and me know that his being in the
chair is as good as my being in it”. As Subash Chandra Bose would later recall
“The general feeling in Congress circles was in favour of Vallabhbhai Patel.
Five provincial committees had proposed Patel but on Gandhi’s prompting,
Patel withdrew in favour of Jawaharlal”. A lawyer and a shrewd politician, Gandhi
knew that Nehru had an inclination for centralised authority and Soviet type
socialism. Then how is it that he favoured Nehru? A possible explanation is
that for organising travel of freedom fighters by train and for their food and stay,
funds were needed. The four annas (25 paise) membership of the Congress
Party was not adequate to cover such expenses. Gandhi apparently
approached Motilal Nehru to arrange funds for the freedom movement. It
seems that Motilal Nehru through his contacts as a leading lawyer arranged
financial support from his industrialist clients such as GD Birla and Jamuna
Das Baiaj who later become Gandhi’s devotees, and in exchange cunningly
obtained promise from Gandhi that Jawaharlal would be the first chief executive
of free India. Gandhi behaved like purushottam Ram that is a perfect person,
and kept his promise even though he was aware of Nehru’s weakness for
centralised authority. Gandhi ought to have followed Krishna’s teachings

32
and for the sake of satya that is truth favoured Vallabhbhai Patel. The author
leaves it to social and political scholars to deliberate on this issue.

8.6 Jai Prakash Narayan’s Sarvodaya or “Force of Service

Movement: According to MG Devasahayam, Jai Prakash Narayan commonly
known as JP was amongst the world’s top most revolutionary for freedom
and liberty. He had the courage to see and say that forms such as
independence, nationalism or socialism in themselves, do not offer adequate
answers to man’s basic needs. He pointed out that when through
bureaucracy, over centralisation, distortion of purpose or otherwise, they
make tyranny a handmaiden, thus discounting its worth. JP began with the
individual, his yearning for liberty and his need to become equal to its
demands. Through panchayati raj that is village based sovereignty, he aimed
to restore to the rural communities of India meaningful control over decisions
most intimately affecting their daily lives. Sarvodaya or “Force of Service
Movement” was his instrument. As its President, he mobilised thousands
of volunteers to carry this revolution as a campaign to the countryside where
they energized, and integrated with efforts at bhudaan that is gifting land for
fair distribution, and furthered his campaign for local self-governance. The
route by which JP arrived at his stature largely parallels India’s history over
the last century since his birth in a tiny village in the state of Bihar. Returning
from study in the United States as a radical revolutionary and Marxist, he
was repeatedly imprisoned and several times escaped arrest during the
struggle for independence. Quit India Movement, the most prominent
agitation of India’s Freedom struggle, launched by Mahatma Gandhi on August
8, 1942 was making only halting progress in the initial months despite
Gandhi’s mass following and the efforts of the Congress Party. On November
8, that year, a revolutionary called Jai Prakash Narayan made a daring escape
from the high security Hazaribagh Jail. A massive manhunt was launched
by the British regime to capture him ‘dead or alive’. More than anything else
this event inflamed the nation, leading eventually to the collapse of the British
Raj and culminating in India’s freedom in 1947.

8.7 Socialism versus Egalitarian: Apparently there is some confusion in

regard to what socialism implies, empowered local communities as advocated
by Gandhi, or “Soviet type state controlled economic system”. According to
the Author, it will be appropriate to describe Gandhi’s empowered local
communities in which all have equal social, environmental, economic and political
rights and opportunities as an “egalitarian (samata) economic system”. Based
on India’s rich spiritual ethos, Gandhi and leaders such as Hegdewar and
Deen Dayal Upadhaya of RSS, so also Dr Ram Manohar Lohia and Jai
Prakash Narayan of Socialist party, all were advocating an egalitarian
economic system, not Soviet type socialism.

33
8.8 MG Devasahayam points out that Jai Prakash Narayan, although as
organizer of the Socialist Party and heir apparent to major leadership in free
India, renounced dialectical materialism and power politics and devoted himself
to the lonely and unrewarding task of enlightening and guiding his country
men and women on crucial problems that many were reluctant to face. He
was a dreamer and an idealist to a fault. It was Maulana Abul Kalam Azad’s
fiery oratory and his call to “Lift up to the skies like leaves before a storm”,
that drew JP to the freedom movement. For JP, freedom transcended beyond
politics and included freedom from hunger, poverty, ignorance and corruption.
This conviction was the hallmark of JP’s struggle before and after
Independence. Power and office did not appeal to him and he remained a
revolutionary in thought and action. Appropriately called the ‘Second
Mahatma’, JP was amongst India’s tallest leaders who had worked and
marched, fought and died for independence, that is self rule for the common
people of India and for the triumph of freedom in a country wherein one-sixth
of the human race lives. Devasahayam concludes, “JP did it not once but
twice, first fighting for independence from the alien rule under Gandhi’s
leadership, and later trying to win freedom back from a native coterie, implying
Nehru family that had cunningly centralised power”.

34
 Chapter 9
Cabinet Mission Plan Aborted
9.1 Gandhi requested the British government to give Lord Wavell, then
Viceroy, an expert to help in legal matters. Prime Minister Attlee instead
gave India a new Viceroy, Lord Mountbatten. Lord Mountbatten was tall and
handsome, and known for his hard work, taking quick decisions and putting
them into effect. Soon he was master of the situation. Nothing important
was done in those days without his advice. He was also a master of publicity.
According to Kripalani, Mountbatten soon earned the confidence of Jawaharlal
and Sardar Patel who started consulting him on most important matters. Lady
Mountbatten ably helped him. She engaged herself in social work and
organised refugee relief camps. Gradually most government help was
channelled through her. She was a kind of diplomat in her own right. She
became friends with Jawaharlal and referred to Gandhi as Bapu. Kripalani
highlights various initiatives by which Gandhi tried to avoid partition of India but
for some reason or the other they got aborted. If matters had been properly
handled, partition of India, hardship of both Hindu and Muslim refugees,
traumas of Kashmir, assassination of Gandhi, adoption of an anti people
Constitution, on going conflicts with Pakistan, and all round social and
environmental degradation witnessed today could have been avoided.

9.2 According to Sashanka Banerjee author of “India’s Security Dilemmas:

Pakistan and Bangladesh” the idea of Pakistan dates back to 1930 when Dr
Mohammad Iqbal during his presidential address at the annual session of
the Muslim League held in Allahabad in 1930 said that the Muslim demand
for creation of a Muslim India within India was perfectly justified. It however
did not find favour with large sections of Indian Muslims. At the Round Table
Conference held in London soon thereafter, the Muslim delegates talked
only in terms of safeguards and proportional representation in the provincial
legislatures. In January 1933 a pamphlet “Now or Never” scripted by a
student Chaudhury Rehmat Ali, a student in the University of Cambridge
advocated a complete break away of the Muslims of north western zone of
India. The Muslim League took on board the concept of a separate national
status. The word Pakistan was formed out of the initial letters of the name of
four provinces, Punjab, Afghanistan (NWFP), Kashmir and the last letters
of Baluchistan, designed to compose the geographical entity of Pakistan.
It was later revised to include Sindh, Assam, Bengal, Hyderabad and Malabar.
Subsequently Rehmat Ali also included parts of UP, Bihar and Rajputana.
He published a political manifesto in 1940 titled Millat of Islam. One can
dismiss these as ravings of a madman but the truth is that his theories
strongly influenced those who favoured a separate Muslim state. Jinnah

35
also toyed with the idea of transfer of population but with a ‘step by step’
approach.

9.3 The Pakistan resolution was adopted in Lahore on April 1940. Lord
Linlithgow then Viceroy wrote in August 1940 a note stating “It goes without
saying that the British government could not contemplate the transfer of
their present responsibilities to any system of government whose authority
is denied by large elements of India’s national life. “Winston Churchill, then
Prime Minister of Britain conveyed to Stafford Cripps on his historic mission
to India that he should strive to procure the consent of minorities. This
made it clear that the retreating colonial administration wanted to leave
behind a warring and divided India. The Cripps Mission failed.

9.4 Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad in his book “India wins Freedom” released
after his demise as per his wishes apparently to avoid retribution from vested
interests, writes that on 17th February 1946, he heard on the radio that the
British Government would send a Cabinet Mission to discuss with the
representatives of India the question of Indian freedom. The Mission would
consist of Lord Pethick Lawrence, Secretary of States for India, Sir Stafford
Cripps, the President of the Board of Trade, and AV Alexandar, the First Lord of
the Admiralty. Azad told the press that he was pleased that the mission included
Sir Stafford Cripps who had come earlier and was an old friend. He added that
the British government was not shirking the problem but facing it boldly.

9.5 On March 15, 1946 British Prime Minister Attlee made a statement in the
House of Commons on the Indian situation. The statement had no precedence
in the history of Indo-British relations. He frankly admitted that the situation
had completely changed and demanded a new approach. His declaration that
any attempt to persist with old methods would not lead to a solution but to a
dead lock, created a great impression in India. Some points that Mr Atlee
made in his speech deserve special mention. He admitted that there had
been faults on both sides and added that they should now look to the future
rather than harp on the past. He explained that it was no good applying the
formulas of the past to the present situation, for the temper of 1946 was not
the temper of 1920, 1930 or even 1942. He went on to say that he did not
wish to stress on the differences between the Indians, for despite of all
differences and divisions Indians were united in their desire for freedom.
This was the underlying demand of all the people of India, whether they were
Hindus or Muslims, Sikhs or Marathas, politicians or civil servants. Mr
Atlee frankly admitted that the urge of nationalism had continuously grown
stronger and permeated even the soldiers who had rendered splendid service
in the war. Mr Atlee said that if there were social and economic difficulties in
India, these could only be resolved by the Indians themselves. He concluded

36
by announcing that the Cabinet Mission was going in a positive mood with
the resolve to succeed.

9.6 The Cabinet Mission arrived in India on 23rd March 1946. The Maulana felt
that the most important issue was the communal discord. One thing nobody
could deny. As a community, the Muslims were extremely anxious about their
future. They were in a clear majority in some states but were a minority in India
as a whole and were troubled by the fear that their position and status in India
would not be secure. After giving considerable thought the Maulana says, he
came to the conclusion that the Constitution of India must, from the nature of
the case, be federal with complete autonomy to the provinces in as many
subjects as possible”. Some powers and functions could be essentially central,
others essentially provincial and some could be either provincial or central to be
exercised by consent. The first step was to devise a formula by which a minimum
number of subjects should be declared as essentially central. There would be
another list of subjects that could be dealt with centrally if the provinces so
desired. This can be called the optional list. And a third list of subjects that
would be with the provincial government. Since the Congress Working Committee
had given the Maulana full power to negotiate with the Cabinet Mission, it was
not necessary for him to discuss with it. He met the members of the Cabinet
Mission for the first time on 4th April 1946. When the Mission asked him how he
would tackle the communal problem, he indicated the solution he had framed.
Lord Pethick Lawrence said, “You are in fact suggesting a solution for the
communal problem”. Sir Stafford Cripps took special interest and cross-examined
him at great length. In the end he was also satisfied.

9.7 The Congress Working Committee met on April 12, 1946 when the Maulana
reported his discussions with the Cabinet Mission in greater detail. The Maulana
said that it was clear that defence, communication and foreign affairs were the
subjects which could be dealt adequately only on an all India basis. Certain
other subjects would obviously be a provincial responsibility but there would be
a third list of subjects where the provincial legislature would decide whether to
retain them as provincial subjects or delegate them to the Centre. He felt that
if the Constitution were framed such that it embodied this principle, it would
ensure that in Muslim majority provinces the Muslims would lead. This would
eliminate from the mind of the Muslims all fears of domination by the Hindus.
This was the best solution for a country such as India.

9.8 The Maulana says that this picture had gradually formed in his mind
and had become quite clear by the time the Cabinet Mission came to India.
He had however not discussed it with his colleagues till then. He did not
consider it necessary since the Congress Working Committee had given
him full powers to negotiate with the Cabinet Mission. He thought that he

37
should state his position in clear and unambiguous terms when the proper
time came.

9.9 The working committee met on April 12 when the Maulana reported
his discussions with the Cabinet Mission. The Working Committee was
initially somewhat sceptical and raised difficulties and doubts. The Maulana
was able to clarify the doubts of the members. The Working Committee
was finally convinced about the soundness of the proposal. Sardar Patel
asked the Maulana whether the Central Government would be restricted to the
three subjects and pointed out that there were subjects such as currency and
financial management that need to be in the central list. He added that trade
and industry could be developed only on an all India basis. The Maulana said
that the solution he had proposed was basically to meet the fears of the Muslim
League.

9.10 The Muslim League had for the first time spoken of a possible division
of India in its Lahore Resolution that later came to be known as the Pakistan
Resolution. The Maulana felt that the time had come to place it before the
country. Accordingly on 15th April 1946 he issued a statement dealing with
the demands of Muslims and other minorities. The Muslim league had
moved further along the path of separation since the Lahore Resolution of
1939. Known more as Pakistan Declaration, it was not clear what exactly
the demand was but it was clear that Muslim majority states should have
full autonomy. But now the League leaders talked loosely of partition and
establishment of an independent state for Muslim majority areas. The Cabinet
Mission was not prepared to concede the demand and favoured a solution
on the lines suggested by the Maulana.

9.11 In May, the Mission took a recess, went to Kashmir and returned on April
24, 1946. After several discussions, the mission issued a statement that
further informal discussions were desirable to find a basis for settlement
between the main parties. It requested the Presidents of Congress and the
Muslim League to nominate their representatives. The Working Committee
authorised the Maulana to appoint its representatives. The Maulana nominated
Jawaharlal and Sardar Patel as his colleagues to represent the Congress. Gandhi
was not a member but was invited for informal discussions.

9.12 Now that the problems seemed resolved, the election of the President
of the Congress needed attention. The Maulana was elected in 1939. The
term according to the Constitution of the Congress Party being of one year,
in normal times the election ought to have been held in 1940. The War
intervened, soon after Satyagraha movements began, and normal activities
suspended. The Congress was declared an illegal organisation and elections

38
could not be held. The situation had returned to normal but a general demand
arose that the Maulana should continue for another year since he was involved
in the negotiations at this critical time. He thought carefully over the matter
and finally came to the conclusion that he must retire. After weighing pros
and cons, he came to the conclusion that Sardar Patel would not be desirable
in the then circumstances. Taking all factors into consideration, it seemed
to him that Jawaharlal should be the new President. Accordingly on 26th
April 1946, he issued a statement proposing Jawaharlal’s name for election
as President and made an appeal that he may be elected unanimously. The
Maulana adds, he acted according to his best judgement but the way things
shaped, it was perhaps the greatest blunder of his political life. He says that
he has not regretted any action of his as the decision at this critical juncture
to withdraw as President of the Congress. It was a mistake that can be
described in Gandhi’s words as one of Himalayan dimensions. His second
mistake was that when he decided not to stand, he did not support Sardar
Patel. He says that he is convinced that if Sardar Patel had succeeded him,
he would have seen to it that the Cabinet Mission Plan was successfully
implemented.

9.13 The Muslim League and the Congress Working Committee had
approved the Cabinet Mission Plan. It however needed the approval of the
All India Congress Committee, usually a formal matter. Accordingly a meeting
of the AICC was called at Bombay on July 7, 1946. When the AICC met, the
Maulana invited Jawaharlal to take over as President from him. He then
briefly explained the main features of the Cabinet Mission Plan and moved
the resolution for its acceptance. The leftists opposed it with great vehemence.
The Congress socialists took the lead part in the opposition, a cheap device
to win popularity. In his reply the Maulana explained the implications and
said that it marked the achievement of independence without a violent and
bloody uprising. He said that it was a great success of the Congress. His
speech had a decisive influence on the audience. When the vote was taken,
the resolution was passed with an overwhelming majority. Thus the seal of
approval for the Cabinet Mission Plan was put on the resolution of the
Congress Working Committee. After a few days the Maulana received
telegrams of congratulations from Lord Pethick Lawrence and Sir Stafford
Cripps. They were happy that the Congress had accepted the resolution
and congratulated the Maulana for his able presentation of the Cabinet Mission
Plan.

9.14 The Muslim League had moved further along the path of a separate
state since the Lahore Resolution of 1939 popularly called the Pakistan
Resolution. It did not however make it clear what exactly the demand was.
The wording was vague and capable of more than one interpretation but the

39
general purport was that Muslim majority states should have full autonomy.
It also talked loosely of an independent State for the Muslim Majority areas.
The Cabinet Mission, Maulana says, was not prepared to concede the
demand. On the contrary the Mission was in favour of a solution on the lines
proposed by the Maulana. Till almost the end of April, the negotiations
continued. As it was getting hot, the Mission took a recess and went to
Kashmir. The Maulana thought of going to Kashmir but apprehending that it
may be misunderstood went to Mussoorie.

9.15 The Mission returned to Delhi on April 24 and reviewed the negotiations
with the Viceroy. On April 27, the Mission issued a statement that further
informal discussions were desirable and invited the President of the Congress
and the Muslim League to nominate representatives of there Working
Committees to meet the Commission in Shimla. The Congress Working
Committee authorised the Maulana to nominate the representatives. He
nominated Jawaharlal and Patel. Gandhi was not formally a member but
was invited to assist. The members of the Mission held further discussions
amongst themselves and framed their proposals that were announced on
May 16 by Mr Atlee in the House of Commons.

9.16 In the midst of this activity an unusual headache cropped up in Kashmir.

The National Conference under the leadership of Sheikh Abdullah had been
fighting for political rights for the people of Kashmir. The Maharaja’s
government replied by arresting him and his colleagues. Jawaharlal being a
Kashmiri had been taking keen interest in Kashmir’s struggle and felt he
ought to be in Kashmir. Irritated, the Maharaja issued a ban on their entry.
When he reached the border he was stopped by the security. Jawaharlal
refused to obey the ban and drove in. He was arrested and later released —
- an unfortunate incident for the Prime Minister designate of India. Theroor,
a former UN official, in his book “Nehru, the Invention of India”, a provocative
title, also relates this story.

9.17 At first, the Maulana says, Jinnah was totally opposed to the scheme.
The Muslim League had gone too far in its demand for an independent state
and found it difficult to retrace its steps. The Mission stated in unambiguous
terms that it could not recommend partition of the country and the formation
of an independent state. Its members observed that such a state would be
unstable and unviable. They felt that the proposal gave the largest possible
autonomy to the provinces and reserved only three subjects for the national
government.

9.18 Election of Congress President: Now that the political and communal
problems seemed to be solved, a new subject now demanded attention. The

40
Maulana had been elected President of the Congress in 1939. According to the
Constitution of the Congress Party, his office was for only one year. In normal
circumstances, a new President would have been elected in 1940. The War
intervened and soon afterwards individual Satyagraha Movements began. Normal
activities were suspended and members of the Congress were arrested in 1940
and again in 1942. Congress was also declared an illegal organisation. There
could therefore be no question of holding election of the President and as a
result the Maulana remained President through the entire period. The situation
had now become normal. The question naturally came up that election for the
President should be held. As soon as this was mooted in the press, there was
a general demand that the Maulana may be elected for another term, the main
reason being the negotiations with the Cabinet Mission. He however sensed
that there were some differences of opinion in the inner circles in that some
wanted Sardar Patel elected. It became a delicate issue and he decided to
quit. The next issue was who should be his successor. Taking all factors into
consideration it seemed to him that Jawaharlal should be the new President,
and on April 26 issued a statement appealing to the members of the Congress
that Jawaharlal may be elected unanimously. The Maulana says that he acted
according to his best judgement but the way things shaped since then made
him realise that it was the biggest blunder of his life. He adds that he regretted
no action of his as much as the decision to withdraw from being the President
of the Congress at this critical juncture. It was a mistake that, he adds, can be
described in Gandhi’s words as one of Himalayan dimension.

9.19 Cabinet Mission Plan aborted: The Maulana says that one of those
unfortunate events then happened that changed the course of history. On
July 10, 1946 Jawaharlal held a press conference in Bombay in which he
made an astonishing statement. Some press representatives asked him
whether with the passing of the resolution by the AICC, the Congress had
accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan in totality including the composition of
the interim government. In reply Jawaharlal said that the Congress would
enter the Constituent Assembly completely unfettered by agreements and
will be free to meet all situations as may arise. The press representatives
further asked if this meant that the Cabinet Mission Plan could be modified.
Jawaharlal replied emphatically that the Congress had agreed only to
participate in the Constituent Assembly and regarded itself free to change or
modify the Cabinet Mission Plan as it thought best.

9.20 The Muslim league had accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan only under
duress. Naturally Mr Jinnah was not very happy about it. In his speech to
the League council he had clearly stated that he recommended acceptance
only because nothing better could be obtained. His political adversaries
started to criticise him by saying that he had failed to deliver the goods.

41
They accused him that he had given up the idea of an independent Islamic
state. They also taunted him that if the League was willing to accept the
Cabinet Mission Plan that denied Muslims to form a separate state, why
had he made so much fuss about an independent Islamic State. He was
thus not at all happy about the outcome of the negotiations with the Cabinet
Mission. Jawaharlal’s statement came to him as a lifesaver. He immediately
issued a statement that this declaration by the Congress President demanded
a review of the whole situation. He asked Liaqat Ali Khan to call a meeting
of the League Council and issued a statement that the Muslim League had
accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan as it was assured that the Congress
also accepted the scheme implying that the Cabinet Mission Plan would be
the basis of the future Constitution of India. Now that the Congress President
had declared that Congress could change the scheme through its majority
in the Constituent Assembly, this would mean that the minorities would be
placed at the mercy of the majority. Jinnah concluded that Jawaharlal’s
declaration meant that the Congress had rejected the Cabinet Mission Plan
and as such the Viceroy should call upon the Muslim League, which accepted
the Plan, to form the Government.

9.21 Perturbed by this development, the Maulana pressed Jawaharlal to

convene a meeting of the Congress Working Committee. Jawaharlal was at
first not willing but when the Maulana insisted, he agreed. In the meeting
the Maulana proposed that to save the situation a statement be issued that
the observations made by Jawaharlal were personal and did not conform to
the decision of the AICC. He explained that a resolution passed by the
AICC could not be changed my any member including the President.
Jawaharlal argued that he had no objection if the Working Committee wanted
to reiterate that the Cabinet Mission Plan had been accepted by the
Congress, but felt that it would be embarrassing to the organisation and him
personally if the Congress Working Committee passed a resolution that the
statement made by the Congress President did not represent the policy of
the Congress. The Working Committee was now in a dilemma. On the one
side, the prestige of the Congress President was at stake. On the other, the
settlement that had been so painfully achieved was in danger. To repudiate
the President’s statement would weaken the organisation but to give up the
Cabinet Mission Plan would ruin the country. Finally it drafted a resolution
that made no reference to Jawaharlal’s statement but reaffirmed the decision
of the AICC.

9.22 The interest of the nation is above any party or its leader. The
Congress Party had promised the people that it would (1) get India liberated
from the British rule and (2) ensure democracy to them. As explained earlier, in
true democracy the national government handles only defence, external relations,

42
national level infrastructure and coordination. Rejection of the Cabinet Mission
Plan meant denial of democracy to the common people of India. The Author
is of the view that Nehru being an impetuous person later committed numerous
such blunders. A serious one was when Indian forces were driving the Pakistan
sponsored infiltrators called Razakars out of Kashmir, overruling the pleas of
the then military chief for a few days to get the whole of Kashmir liberated,
Nehru ordered cease fire and offered plebiscite that has left the Kashmir issue
unresolved till today! A Kashmiri himself, he thereby inflicted immense
ongoing suffering on his own people. He was at his worst when he
pressurised Dr BR Ambedkar to draft a Constitution based on the Government
of India Act of 1935, a colonial law and no charter of independence. He
capped it by imposing Soviet type centralised planning and a controlled
economy that impoverished local communities and led to bankruptcy in
1991. If Nehru’s supporters hold Ambedkar responsible, Nehru as the chief
executive ought to have rejected the Constitution drafted by Ambedkar. The
Author clarifies that his criticism of Nehru is not personal but professional.

9.23 Some analysts are critical of the claims made by the Maulana in his
book “India attains Independence” that the Cabinet Mission Plan was the product
of his genius. We all know that the plan was based on Gandhi’s vision of true
democracy. The Maulana adopted an excellent strategy in that he (1) kept
Gandhi out of the negotiations thus avoiding confrontation between Jinnah and
Gandhi, (2) did an excellent job of successfully negotiating it with the Cabinet
Mission, and (3) obtained the approval of both the Cabinet Mission and Jinnah.
All this is well documented in British records and cannot be questioned. Where
the Maulana went wrong is that though the Cabinet Mission Plan had been
accepted by all the parties, he ought to have continued as President of the
Congress Party till the plan had been formally adopted, the members of the
Cabinet Mission had departed, and its implementation had become a
commitment that could not be retracted either by Jinnah or by Nehru.

9.24 Gandhi Solution for reuniting India: With the rejection of the
Cabinet Mission Plan, partition of India became a foregone conclusion.
Rajmohan Gandhi describes a last ditch effort made by Gandhi to avoid
partition called “Gandhi Solution” mostly forgotten now. On March 19, 1947
Gandhi said, “I would know no peace till I have found a solution for preventing
partition”. Before the month ended he knew what he should ask for. As with
all inspired solutions, his solution looks self evident in hindsight but at that
time it was far from obvious. Weighing up the realities, Gandhi saw that a
Jinnah-led Muslim League government in Delhi, if installed with the agreement
of the Congress, could address all of them. Remedying polarisation across
the subcontinent, it could preserve the unity not only of Punjab and Bengal
but also of India as a whole. Half an hour after Gandhi left, Azad met the

43
Viceroy and told him of the Gandhi Solution. “Azad staggered me”,
Mountbatten said, “by saying that it was perfectly feasible of being carried
out since Gandhi could unquestionably influence the whole of Congress to
accept it and work it loyally”. He added that such a plan would be the quickest
way to stop bloodshed. Rajmohan Gandhi adds the Muslim league leaders
in 1944 had indirectly shown interest in a role in India as a whole. Among
those breathing freely would have been the border-states that are now in
turmoil. Most Congress leaders favoured the proposal. This proposal also
got aborted, as it was not acceptable to Nehru. The Author reiterates that in
democracy no one, not even Gandhi, is above the people. It was the Dharma
that is duty of the Congress Party to impeach Nehru and elect a leader such
as Sardar Vallabhai Patel in his place to handle matters. By not doing so,
it has inflicted immense harm on the nation and its common people.

44
 Chapter 10
Divided India attains Independence

10.1 Jinnah was sworn in Lahore on August 14, 1947 as the President of
Pakistan. Lord Mountbatten Governor General of British India representing
the British crown sworn in Nehru as the first Prime Minister of independent
India on the midnight between August 14 & 15, as symbolism of transfer of
power. Nehru then made his famous speech “When the world sleeps India
wakes to keep its tryst with destiny”. He apparently overlooked that as we
all know, half the world was then awake!

10.2 Earlier with the announcement of partition, communal violence spread

like wildfire across northern, central and Eastern India. Innocent men, women
and children were being killed or maimed. Hoards of Muslim families got
into crowded trains from India to Pakistan and Hindu, Sindhi and Sikh families
from Pakistan to India. The less fortunate trekked. Many of them were
looted and/or butchered on the way. It turned out to be amongst the world’s
worst disasters of human suffering in recent history. Lady Mountbatten
played a major role in managing the refugee camps set up for the hordes of
refugees who kept coming from Pakistan and relief camps for the Muslim
families in India rendered homeless by the mobs and waiting for trains or
buses to go to Pakistan.

10.3 Partition involved numerous problems such as division of civil services,

armed forces, financial reserves, and such other matters. To handle it, the
British government had indicated that the transfer of power would be near the
end of the year. Mountbatten got it advanced to August 15, 1947 apparently
because the Japanese had surrendered on August 15 to the Eastern Command
of the Allies headed by him. The people of India now celebrate Lord Mountbatten’s
greatest day in their independence day every year! Advancing the transfer of
power created numerous problems such as of dividing assets, armed forces
and the bureaucracy, and managing the influx of large number of refugees
migrating out of and into the two nations. Britain had taken timber and other
products from India to support the war on the understanding that the amount
due would be kept as sterling reserves and given after the war ended. Since
Nehru had agreed to partition, Pakistan rightly deserved a proportionate
share in it. Gandhi said that Pakistan should be given its share —- a just
and fair advice. This was one of the erroneous allegations levelled by Nathu
Ram Godse as justification for assassinating Gandhi.

10.4 Ignoring Gandhi’s pleas not to succumb to the efforts being made by
Jinnah to create rifts between the Hindu and Muslim communities, the Hindu

45
Mahasabha of which Godse was a member, organised communal riots that
strengthened Jinnah’s demand for a separate Pakistan. Muslim League,
Hindu Mahasabha and Nehru are thus jointly responsible for the partition of
India. Following the assassination of Gandhi, the Hindu Mahasabha was
banned. It later regrouped with a new name, Vishwa Hindu Parishad. Both
RSS & VHP have scholars who respect Gandhi and his vision of true
democracy symbolised in Ram Raj. They also have bigoted Hindus in larger
numbers who use offensive language and resort to violent methods to provoke
conflicts between Hindus and Muslims. Nathu Ram Godse of Hindu
Mahasabha assassinated Gandhi for partitioning India – a crime that Gandhi
did not commit, in fact was totally opposed to and with Gandhi, all hope of
Swaraj that is, self rule for the people of India.

10.5 Chakravarti Rajagopalachari was sworn in as the Governor General of

Independent India In 1948. A Constituent Assembly with Dr Rajendra Prasad
as its Chairman and Dr BR Ambedkar as its convener was later constituted.
It drafted a Constitution that was formally adopted on November 26, 1949. August
15 is now celebrated as the Independence Day and November 26 as the Republic
Day of India. Later during debates in the Rajya Sabha on September 3, 1953,
on being hackled by many followers of Gandhi for drafting a flawed Constitution,
Dr Ambedkar reacted, “People keep saying to me, ‘So you are the author of the
Constitution’. My answer is I was a hack. I did what I was told to do much
against my will. If I have the opportunity, I will be the first person to burn it. It will
not do good to anyone”. What is most surprising is that leaders such as Dr
Rajendra Prashad and Dr Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan both scholars of India’s
tradition of democracy did not oppose the proposal, nor initiated steps to
rectify it. Apparently the lure of high office kept them mum.

10.6 On top of the flawed polity Nehru imposed Soviet type centralised planning
and a controlled economy thus instituting a mixed economy in a mixed up
polity! To meet the needs of centralised political and economic governance, the
administrative structure had to be greatly enlarged. The All India and State
services not only grew in size and authority, a large cadre of development and
extension officials was also created. Lacking accountability to local communities,
initially petty and later pervasive political and bureaucratic corruption took roots.
All this greatly increased governance overheads and the sufferings of the common
people. When some people complained about mounting corruption, Nehru is
believed to have replied that the money remained in India while earlier it was
being siphoned out by the foreign rule —- a flippant response! Chester Bowles,
Ambassador of USA in India during that period, is reported to have said, “India is
a functioning anarchy”. Some Russian consultants who came to advise India
on setting up public sector enterprises are believed to have said that in the
Soviet Union they did not believe in god but after seeing India, they accepted

46
that god existed for he alone can manage India! The truth is that while politicians,
the state bureaucracy and the upper strata of society got independence, the
vast majority common people living in the villages and urban slums remained
and still are subjects in an exploitative political system. The people in the
middle and high-income groups are now abusing the poor as cheap servants
and petty labour to optimise their comforts and wealth. They do not realise that
the day of reckoning is not far when nature will have its revenge in the form of
water scarcity and eventually global warming, a concern recently voiced by Al
Gore.

10.7 Afghans of North West India: An important issue is whether partition

was fair to the various Afghan tribes in the border state of North Western
India. According to Major General (Rtd) BN Raizada, Defence and Military
Adviser in the High Commission of India in Pakistan, during the period 1988
to 1991, Muslim League a theocratic political organization was able to spread
its influence only in the Eastern, Central and Northern parts of India but not
in the Northern, North Western and Western parts including the areas now
comprising Pakistan. Ironically, the areas predominantly under the influence
of the Muslim League have after partition remained in India, and the areas
opposed to it are now part of Pakistan!

10.8 Pakistan, a faulty creation, comprises of four distinct sub-nationalities

namely (1) Punjabis, (2) Sindhis, (3) Baluchis and (4) Pashtuns living in the
four major provinces of Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and North West Frontier
Province. Pashtuns and Baluchis are essentially warrior tribes intensely
loyal to their own tribe and its chief. During the British regime they were
constantly engaged in internecine conflicts and battles for gaining control
and supremacy over the other. The Baluchis are spread across both Pakistan
and Iran and the Pashtun across Pakistan and Afghanistan. The British
found it difficult to control this volatile region but managed to draw international
borders with Iran and Afghanistan through a line called Durand Line that
divided both these tribes and hence not recognized by either of them. In the
North West, even Afghanistan has refused to recognize the Durand Line and
to date open borders exist in the region with free movement across it and
through the Khyber Pass.

10.9 Baluchis never considered themselves as part of India and have

continued their struggle for independence till today. After partition, the Khan
of Kalat, the most powerful princely head in Balochistan, refused to merge
with Pakistan but was forced to do so through arms. Mengal and Bugti are
the two dominant tribes of Balochistan. Both have risen in armed rebellion
against Pakistan though unsuccessfully for lack of support from any
international power. First it was the Mengals under Attaullah Khan whose

47
movement was crushed ruthlessly by the use of force and betrayal by the
Bugtis under Nawab Akbar Khan who was won over by the Pakistani
Government and in return made the governor of Balochistan. Attaullah Khan
Mengal was forced to go into exile in the UK where he lives till now. Nawab
Akbar Khan remained loyal to the Pakistani Government for over a decade
holding important political positions in Balochistan either as Governor or
Chief Minister until replaced by his rivals. He realized, though belatedly, that
he had been used by the military regime to keep the Baluchis in check and
that the Punjabi dominated Government and the army had not fulfilled any of
the promises made for the development of the region. He therefore led a
popular armed uprising against the present regime that is continuing unabated
although Nawab Akbar Khan has been killed by the Pakistan armed forces.
Understandably to protect their border areas from the spill over effect Iran
has been supporting Pakistan while India has remained neutral for want of
foresight.

10.10 Pashtuns under Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, founding leader of Khudai
Khidmatgar known as ‘Frontier Gandhi’, never supported the partition of
India or creation of a theocratic state. Ironically Pashtuns were never given
any voice in determining their future. The choice given to them was to join
either India or Pakistan. For reasons of both geography and religion they
opted to join Pakistan but have been demanding a separate state or
autonomous region named Pakhtunkhwa, and have remained friendly with
India. Awami National Party, a political outfit founded by Khan Abdul Wali
Khan a son of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, now headed by his son and widow
have openly declared their close relations with India and forged links between
each other. The area except Peshawar remains under tribal control and in
turmoil even today without any visible federal authority. Drug barons fortified
inside impenetrable forts mostly control these areas.

10.11 Ironically Punjabis, the originators of hate India propaganda war

who now dominate the entire politico-military and socio-economic life of
Pakistan, were firmly against partition or creation of a separate Muslim
state. Led by Sardar Sikandar Hayat Khan, Governor of undivided Punjab,
who had founded the Unionist Party of India, wanted a truly federal structure
on the lines indicated by the Cabinet Mission Plan. However being the
biggest beneficiaries of the Partition, today they vehemently oppose any
idea of even a confederation leave alone a federation. Strangely they now
demand equality and parity with India in international affairs despite Pakistan
being an almost failed state under the control of military dictators and the
religious fanatical militants.

48
10.12 Sindh was initially neutral but became a supporter of partition and was
the first provincial assembly to pass the Pakistan Resolution. Later Mohammad
Ali Jinnah managed to also convince the Punjabis. Jinnah made the Pakistan
Declaration in a public meeting in Lahore in 1939 where a National Monument
has been built as a memorial of that declaration.

10.13 The above analysis clearly establishes that Pakistan comprising

the present areas was imposed on an unwilling people who were neither
fundamentalists nor supporters of the Muslim League. Pakistan is truly a
creation of an inflexible, indecisive and insensitive Congress leadership.
Paradoxically once the transfer of power was completed the friendly and
moderate Punjabis became the greatest enemies letting loose a violent blood
bath against the Hindus and Sikhs forcing them to leave Pakistan. This led
to retaliation with matching carnage by the Hindus in India. The Punjabi
Muslims who were in majority in West Pakistan usurped total control of
West Pakistan supported by the loyal Pashtuns in the army. Gradually the
Baluchis, Sindhis, Pashtuns and the Bengalis realised they were being
exploited by Punjabi Muslims. Thus began an era of internal political struggle
for freedom in all the provinces except Punjab. Significantly the Sindhi leader
who moved the Pakistan Resolution in the Sindh Assembly turned completely
hostile to the new government and founded the Jiye Sindh Party demanding
complete autonomy and creation of Sindhu Desh. He expressed his
repentance for his role in the creation of Pakistan and apologized to the
Hindus who were consequently forced to leave Sindh. For his anti national
activities allegedly in connivance with India, he was jailed where he ultimately
died as a disillusioned person.

10.14 Major General BN Raizada concludes, Indian Foreign Policy never

understood the importance of the ground realities in Pakistan and its
implications on India’s national security. It followed a weak policy of non-
interference in the internal affairs of these peripheral regions and failed to
take advantage of the then prevailing situation and allowed vested interests
to gain influence and control over most of these vulnerable regions. As a
result India now finds itself completely encircled by China directly or indirectly
with a long common Himalayan border causing serious internal conflicts
and militant activities. As analysed in the next Chapter, China took full
advantage of India’s aforesaid blunders to manipulate a blitzkrieg for usurping
Tibet. Shaken by the multi pronged Chinese attack, Nehru made a public
statement recognizing the sovereignty of China over Tibet thereby foreclosing
any intervention in the future by the United Nations and the world community
in favour of the rights of the Buddhist community of Tibet. This reaffirms that
Nehru was an impetuous person who took and imposed decisions without

49
assessing their legitimacy and long-term implications for India. (Based on
interview of Major General BN Raizada by the Author)

10.15 In East Pakistan the situation is even more complex. It is separated

from West Pakistan by a vast track of India and though the Muslims are in
the majority, their language is Bengali while the language of Muslims of
East Pakistan is Urdu. As subsequent events have shown, the differences
culminated in East Pakistan getting separated from West Pakistan to become
Bangladesh. This reaffirms that that the rejection of the Cabinet Mission
Plan was indeed a monumental disaster.

10.16 Sashanka Banerjee in his book “India’s Security Dilemmas”

questions, “Was partition of India inevitable? Were the religious differences
between the Hindus and the Muslims or the ideological disagreements
between secular Congress and communal Muslim League so acute that the
subcontinent lunged towards partition?” He adds, “Pakistan scholars have
claimed that if the Congress had arrived in a power sharing arrangement
both at the provincial and central levels with the Muslim League that
accommodated the demands of the Muslim majority provinces, there was a
fair chance that partition could have been avoided”. Sadly India is now
surrounded by hostile states and is likely to face perpetual threat to its
peace and security.

50
 Chapter 11
China usurps Tibet
11.1 In 1954 Chinese leader Chou En Lai visited India followed by visits by
Nehru and Indira Gandhi to China. It marked the beginning of the relationship of
“Hindi Chinee, bhai bhai” meaning “Indians and Chinese are brothers”. A treaty
based on “Panch Sheel”, the five principles of peaceful coexistence, was signed
that became the focus of a Conference held in Bandung held in 1955.

11.2 According to Frank Katherine, there was a surprise twist in 1956.

China had been clandestinely building a road through the remote Aksai Chin
region of Ladakh in Kashmir. Tibet was since ancient times an autonomous
region of people of Buddhist religion headed by a Dalai Lama elected by the
people as its spiritual and political head. In 1959 China consolidated its
domination of Tibet. The Dalai Lama and a large number of Tibetan families
fled to India where they were given political asylum and settled mainly in
Dalhousie and Dharmashala. Indira Gandhi helped in establishing a Central
Relief Committee for thousands of Tibetan refugees who followed the Dalai
Lama in exile. China condemned India for harbouring the Dalai Lama. Being
an impetuous person and apparently to appease China, Nehru made a public
statement that India recognised the sovereignty of China over Tibet when he
had no authority to do so. He thereby foreclosed any initiative by India in the
future to get Tibet liberated from the clutches of China.

11.3 In September 1962, when Indira and Nehru were in Europe, Chinese
troops began to cross the British established MacMohan Line in the Northeast
Frontier Agency now named Arunachal Pradesh at the tri-junction between
India, Tibet and Bhutan. China made another penetration into the 16,000
square mile Aksai Chin region in Ladakh in the Kashmir region through which
the Chinese had secretly constructed a 750 miles road in 1956-57 linking Sinkiang
in Tibet with China. Far away in Paris, Nehru dismissed these intrusions as
petty conflicts between patrols. Indira and Nehru returned leisurely to Delhi
in October. Agreeing to send two divisions of soldiers to the North East,
Nehru and Indira again left on a State visit to Ceylon. After they returned on
October 20, the Chinese launched their first full-scale invasion into Indian
territories using heavy mortar, mountain artillery and tanks. On October 22
a state of emergency was imposed and India requested United States and
Britain for arms.

11.4 Up to the eve of the Chinese invasion in October 1962, India’s Defence
Minister, Krishna Menon, had refused to take the Chinese threat seriously
with the result that both, the country and the army, were woefully unprepared

51
for the assault. When the Chinese had been amassing their forces and
building the Aksai Chin Road, Menon had set the Indian defence industry to
produce pressure cookers and coffee percolators. When the Chinese invaded,
voices rose in a chorus demanding Menon’s head. Even before this episode,
Menon was a far from popular person. As High Commissioner in London in
the forties, he had become embroiled in a dubious contract for buying several
thousand jeeps for India of which only a fraction had been delivered. Though
Menon was an old friend and mentor of Indira, she called for his resignation
as Defence Minister to deflect the blame for the Chinese debacle from her
father. On November 19, Indira’s forty-fifth birthday, news came that the
Chinese had broken through the Se La Pass beyond which lay Assam and
the rest of India. The Chinese, in fact, had come down the Himalayas in the
North East in a human avalanche. They then besieged the under equipped
and badly outnumbered Indian troops! Tezpur, a major town in Assam just
thirty miles from the Chinese line, was threatened. By midday, Indira had
decided that she would go there. She flew to Tejpur in a plane laden with Indian
Red Cross supplies. The Chinese now occupied some 50,000 square miles of
India’s territory. Indira returned to Delhi for exactly eight hours displaying a
flaming confidence because the tribal people had refused to leave Tezpur. The
Chinese invasion of India came out of the blue and ended as abruptly as it
began. On November 21, 1962, the Chinese unexpectedly announced a unilateral
ceasefire and withdrew in the eastern sector to a position fifteen miles north of
the McMahon Line, and to the line of actual control in the other sectors. Frank
Katherine concludes, “India had been completely humiliated, Nehru had been
crushed. The war was over”.

11.5 China was a feudal state with Taoism and teachings of Confucius as its
main spiritual yearnings. Impressed by the Soviet Union, it adopted Soviet type
single party government, centralised planning and a controlled economy. When
the Soviet Union collapsed, China retained the single party government controlled
by the communist party and opened its economy to the global market. With a
single party government and rightist economic model, China is now like Hitler’s
Germany a fascist nation and can one day be a major threat to global peace.

11.6 Independent India’s leadership in its formative years: Nehru was

an impetuous person. Indira Gandhi inherited Nehru’s highhandedness; Sanjay
Gandhi inherited his mother’s brashness. Rajiv Gandhi inherited his father’s
sobriety and compassion; Sonia Gandhi has picked up Indian culture better
than many Indians by birth. BJP leaders invoke Ram Temple to win votes but
avoid demanding Ram Raj. All political parties are abusing the Westminster
system that fosters self seeking, coalition politics. India needs Gandhi’s village
republics. The followers of Gandhi can call it Gram Swaraj. Those of Vishva
Hindu Parishad can call it Ram Raj.

52
11.7 The Westminster system evolved in Britain through abuse by its feudal
lords. They first beheaded a tyrannical king. They then instituted a
parliament with a House of Commons and a House of Lords to protect their
feudal interests. They then declared the parliament supreme, not the people.
The Westminster system is functioning well in a small country such as
Britain in which power is shared by two political parties. It has however led
to instability in most nations that adopted it. Gandhi favoured directly elected
chief executive so that he is directly accountable to the people. It is currently
in practised in good democracies such as in nations such as USA.

11.8 The President of USA is lodged in a magnificent residence called

White House. There are no official lodges for his team of secretaries who
are equivalent to our ministers. The legislators too are only given housing
allowances. Most of them opt for long-term accommodations in private
homes and condominiums. Only the very wealthy can afford staying in
Washington DC’s hotels. Legislators mostly return to their constituencies
in between sessions of the parliament. As opposed to this, ministers and
many legislators are lodged in big bungalows in Lutyen’s Delhi built by
India’s erstwhile imperial rulers. This amounts to blatant abuse of political
authority and needs to be phased out.

53
 Chapter 12
Centralised Polity further divides India
12.1 The unemployed educated youth of India who have joined violent
movements such as ULFA, NAXAL & PWG, are truly freedom fighters demanding
their democratic right of local control over local resources. If granted they will
join the mainstream of society for nation building. The problem has become
more complex in the North East by influx of a large number of refugees from
Bihar and Bangladesh. BG Verghese in his book “India’s Northeast Resurgent”
projects a very complex scenario following the failure of the Cabinet Mission
Plan in 1946. It is natural, Verghese points out, for the tribal communities to
assert their ethnic identity. What is worrying them most is the perceived threat
to their identity and culture in which language plays a prominent part. It began
with the import by the British of a whole class of functionaries from Bengal to
administer and service the newly acquired territories, the natural corollary being
the use of Bengali in the conduct of administration. Arguments such as Assamese
was but a dialect of Bengali soon led to Bengali being declared the official
vernacular of Assam with even primary education being taught in Bengali. This
was a severe blow to Assamese pride and handicap for their children. To these
were added concerns regarding political restructuring. Assam, earlier placed
with Bengal, was recognised in 1874 as a chief commissioner’s province including
neighbouring regions encompassing an area of 54,100 square miles with Shillong
as capital and a population of 4.15 million. With the approach of independence
the Muslim League began to press for inclusion of Assam in East Pakistan,
now Bangladesh.

12.2 Had India, notwithstanding partition, democratically empowered its people

and followed a pragmatic foreign policy to safeguard its interests, it could have
effectively protected Jammu, Laddakh and Kashmir, spread its influence over all
our small neighbouring states and engaged our enemies in Afghanistan,
Balochistan and North West Frontier Province, instead of in Jammu, Laddakh
and Kashmir. Similarly we could have engaged China at its border with Tibet
and not on our border. Our policy of Panch Sheel and concept of the Non
Alignment Movement were good but we should not have assumed that others
will not violate them and ought to have strengthened and fully prepared ourselves
for the worst. At the root of all our problems is the rejection of the Cabinet
Mission Plan. Most third world nations that got independence after India did,
adopted big brother India’s flawed model of centralised democracy with equally
disastrous consequences.

54
 Chapter 13
Indira Gandhi’s Turbulent Period
13.1 During the period Nehru was Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi moved to
the Prime Minister’s official residence. She acted as hostess to visiting
dignitaries and accompanied her father during official trips abroad. When
Nehru died in June 1963, Lal Bahadur Shastri, a dedicated servant of the
people was nominated Prime Minister by the Congress parliamentary party.
He died of heart attack in Tashkent in 1964 where he had gone to resolve the
discord of India with Pakistan over Kashmir.

13.2 The Congress Party then nominated Indira Gandhi as its Prime Minister
candidate. She won the general election held in 1965 to become the third
Prime Minister of India. The Congress Party split in 1967 and in the mid term
general election that followed in the same year the Congress won. Since
because of the split, the Congress Party did not have absolute majority, it
formed a coalition government with Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister and Morarje
Desai as Deputy Prime Minister. She abolished the privy purses of the
Maharajas and nationalised the banks thus winning the good will of the
people. While abolishing the privy purses of the Maharajas was proper,
nationalising the banks gave a sellback to economic growth. She announced
mid term elections in 1971 in which the Congress won majority votes and
she strengthened her position as Prime Minister.

13.3 Veteran socialist leader Raj Narayan challenged her election in the
Allahabad High Court. On June 24, 1975 the Court declared the election of
1971 invalid. On the advice of her younger son Sanjay, Indira Gandhi dissolved
the parliament and on June 25, 1975 declared state of emergency under an
undemocratic colonial provision in the Constitution. During the emergency
she put the leaders of opposition parties under house arrest and adopted
various measures for ostensibly cleansing politics and improving the condition
of the people. Misguided by the reports of her sycophants, she withdrew
the emergency in January 1977 and announced general elections. She lost
the election and realised that the emergency had alienated her from the people.
Jai Prakash Narayan who opposed emergency promoted a new party named
Janata Party, a coalition of strange bedfellows. The Janata Party won the 1977
elections and elected Morarji Desai at India’s prime minister. Because of its
inherent contradictions, the Janata party did more to find faults with Indira
Gandhi than do anything positive. It procured a warrant of arrest on various
charges against Indira Gandhi and sent police to arrest her. She refused to
seek bail, was put in prison, and later released without bail. She thereby won
the bout and the sympathy of the people.

55
13.4 Largely because of the mistakes of the Janata Party and to the surprise
of political observers in India and abroad, Indira Gandhi won the election held in
1980. That year her younger son Sanjay died when an aerobatic aircraft he was
piloting crashed. Against this disturbed domestic background, Indira Gandhi
inducted her elder son Rajiv then a pilot in Indian Airlines, inexperienced and
hesitant in politics, as her aide. In June 1981, Rajiv Gandhi contested from
Amethi, his late brother’s constituency, and won the election as a Member of
Parliament. With this she acquired an amazing new lease of power.

13.5 During the period Indira Gandhi was Prime Minister a major event
took place in Pakistan. Mujeebur Rehman a leader of East Pakistan, now
Bangladesh, got elected as Prime Minister of Pakistan. Mujeebur Rehman
went to Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan for taking oath as Prime Minister
of Pakistan. Then Military chief of Pakistan Yahiya Khan put both Mujeebur
Rehman and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto a former Prime Minister of Pakistan under
house arrest and himself assumed authority as the dictator of Pakistan.
The military started genocide of supporters of Mujeebur Rehman in East
Pakistan. This led to a large number of refugee families of East Pakistan
migrating into India in 1965. Indira Gandhi sought intervention from the
world community. Upset by it, Yahiya Khan attacked India. Indira sent
Indian forces to defend both western and eastern borders between India and
Pakistan. India won the war and with the consent of the United Nations
declared Bangladesh an independent state. Mujeebur Rehman became the
first Prime Minister of Bangladesh.

13.6 The Akali Dal of the Sikh community largely controlled the politics in
Punjab. Mixing politics with religion, Indira Gandhi established contact with a
Sikh youth Brindanwalle. When in 1984 he betrayed her and took refuge in
the Golden Temple of the Sikh community in Amritsar, she sent the Indian
army that bombarded the Temple to flush him out. Angered by the assault
on their Temple, the Sikh community took to violence in India and abroad.
The same year, a Sikh soldier on security duty at the residence of Indira
Gandhi assassinated her. This culminated in riots all over the country inflicting
damage to life and property of innocent Sikh families. It is ironic that the
Sikh who came into existence to defend Hindus against conversion to Islam
by bigoted Mughal Monarch Aurangzeb, were now being attacked by the
Hindus! It took quite some time to heal the wounds.

13.7 According to recent reports, Bangladesh is again heading for a long

military rule. Just as two former Prime Ministers of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto
and Nawaz Sharif, have been in exile, it seems that two most popular leaders
of Bangladesh’s two parties, former Prime Ministers Khaleda Zia and Sheikh

56
Hasina may be placed under house arrest if they return from exile. On the
other hand pressure is getting built up on Pervaz Mussaraff to give up his
uniform. The unfortunate assassination of Benazir Bhutto has further
complicated matters.

57
 Chapter 14
Rajiv Gandhi initiates vital reforms
14.1 Rajiv Gandhi, a pilot with Indian Airlines, had no inclination to enter politics.
The leaders of the Congress Party persuaded him to seek election as the
Prime Minister candidate in the election in 1984 that followed Indira Gandhi’s
assassination. Rajiv Gandhi led the Congress to a major election victory amassing
the largest majority in the Parliament. After assuming charge, his significant
contributions have been (1) emphasis on modernisation of the economy, (2)
economic liberalisation, and (3) empowering local communities. Modernisation
of the economy opened avenues for economic development and created access
to consumer goods that had been largely denied to the people in Nehru’s socialist
economic planning based on flawed Soviet practises. Once in the thick of
things, Rajiv Gandhi began leading it in a direction significantly different to the
earlier norms on socialism. He improved bilateral relations with the United
States long strained owing to India’s socialism. He established close relationship
with the Soviet Union, enlarged scientific cooperation and expanded economic
cooperation with it. He drew on his experience as a pilot by emphasising the
value of technology and modern business methods. He increased government
support for science and technology and associated industry in such initiatives.
He removed quotas and reduced import taxes and tariffs on technology based
industries especially computers, airlines, defence and telecommunications.
He came down heavily on the licence regime and introduced measures
significantly curtailing it. In 1986, Rajiv announced a national education policy
to modernise and expand higher education programmes across India. He was
the founder of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya programme in the year 1986. What
these measures collectively did was to create conducive environment for India’s
overall economic development. During Rajiv Gandhi’s period serious thought
was also given to the functioning of the public sector. He initiated discussions
with public sector executives on wasteful practises. Public sector companies
being owned by the people, he suggested offering their shares to the public
especially the villagers.

14.2 Rajiv Gandhi’s greatest initiative as Prime Minister was empowerment

of local communities. Opening the dwar that is door of the Ram Temple in
Ayodhaya and highlighting that out of a rupee, only 16 paise reach the
village, Rajiv Gandhi initiated the Panchayati Raj constitutional amendments.
He was wrongly advised to send Indian forces to Sri Lanka to curb terrorist
activities of Tamil Tigers. The Tamil Tigers like the ULFA, NAXAL and PWG
of India, are truly freedom fighters demanding their democratic rights of local
control over local resources. Angered, some Tamils in India, who were
supporting the movement of the Tamil Tigers, assassinated Rajiv Gandhi on

58
May 21, 1991 when he was addressing a meeting in the Tamil state of India
for the ensuing national elections. It is ironic that Rajiv Gandhi who initiated
local empowerment in India was assassinated by supporters of the Tamil Tigers
who are fighting in Sri Lanka for their democratic right of local empowerment!

14.3 The Congress Party nominated Narsimha Rao as its Prime Minister
candidate in the ensuing national election. He won the election with a big
majority as sympathy vote for the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. The
constitutional amendments for local empowerment were naturally on the agenda
of the new government. Reluctant to let go power, the members of parliament
dillydallied for sometime and finally promulgated the 73rd & 74th Panchayati Raj
constitutional amendments in 1992 such that they retain effective power with
the state and have only succeeded in decentralising corruption! None the
less Articles 243ZD & 243ZE introduced through these amendments make
a powerful statement in that they mandate that based on the available social,
environmental and financial resources, and funds devolved through the objective
processes of the central and state finance commissions, the panchayats
and municipalities shall prepare local plans suiting local needs in analytical,
quantitative and spatial form, coordinated by district and metropolitan planning
committees as district and metropolitan plans. The district and city plans will
logically be coordinated by state planning authorities with state level
infrastructure as state plans, and the state plans by a national planning
authority with national level infrastructure as a national plan, all in analytical,
quantitative and spatial form. Such scientific regional planning practised in
ancient India as Vastu Shastra, is an iterative ongoing process, not a Soviet
type five-year exercise. It is currently practised in most western democracies.
Vested political interests have however prevented enforcement of this
constitutional mandate. Instead, through amendments in the Constitution,
the legislators have cunningly made themselves ex-officio members of
panchayats and municipalities and got large amounts sanctioned to themselves
as constituency development funds. These provisions violate the scheme of
the Constitution in that a legislator cannot (1) perform executive functions,
and (2) hold two elective offices.

14.4 It is now the constitutional obligation of the government to discard the

flawed Soviet type centralised planning, earlier supra constitutional now totally
unconstitutional, and introduce scientific regional planning that will be an ongoing
iterative process, not a five year exercise. The Soviet type Planning
Commission and State Planning Boards need to be wound up, and their
professional staff trained in regional planning absorbed in the National, State
and Local Planning Authorities. All development authorities including the
highly corrupt Delhi Development Authority need to be abolished being
unconstitutional, and their unwanted staff laid-off. It is unfortunate that our
imperial judiciary has neither enforced the Panchayati Raj amendments, nor

59
declared the anti-people provisions of the Constitution ultra-virus. We urge
Sonia Gandhi to, as homage to late Rajiv Gandhi, organise a national debate on
this issue and ensure that the 73rd and 74th Constitutional amendments initiated
by Rajiv Gandhi are properly implemented without further delay.

14.5 When the Author completed his tenure with the government in 1991,
Digvijay Singh, then Chief Minister, Madhya Pradesh, invited him as a member
on the State Planning Board. Based on discussions in it, he issued orders
that the Panchayats and Municipalities shall prepare local plans that shall
be coordinated by District Governments. He also instituted directly elected
Mayors as the chief executive in place of the IAS Municipal Commissioner
as during the British rule. This significantly fortified accountability and led to
improvement in revenues and the quality of civic services. Kerala too is
practicing scientific regional planning while most states are not.

14.6 After the promulgation of the 73rd & 74th constitutional amendments,
acquisition of village land for urban and/or industrial development such as in
Delhi, Noida & Gurgaon in the National Capital Region, and in Nandigram in
West Bengal, is a blatant violation of rural jurisdictions. The village
Panchayats being the planning authority, alone can now zone rural land,
lease land as zoned for housing, industry, etc, and collect lease money and
other taxes from the users as in western democracies. The manner in
which men, women and children protecting their legal right to agriculture
land were brutally massacred in Nandigram, West Bengal, amounts to
homicide. Prof. Laski said “fascism is capitalist democracy turned at bay”,
implying that politicians and capitalists connive to abuse the common people.
Neither the Human Rights Commissions nor the superior courts have taken
cognisance of the above abuse. An important function of the superior courts
is to monitor that the Constitution is not violated. Our imperial judiciary has
miserably failed to perform this constitutional duty. The reason apparently
is that most lawyers and judges still have the mindset of an imperial polity.

14.7 The Nithari mass killing of children in Noida is illustrative of the

depravation in our social fabric. According to recent media reports, over 60
million children go hungry every day in India. Unless we correct our political
system and faithfully enforce the laws, such abuse will keep increasing and
India will eventually drift into anarchy, further balkanisation and total
degeneration. It may then be too late to institute any reforms. A serious
bottleneck is the mindset amongst even well meaning citizens that the
governments at the national and state levels are governments while
panchayats and municipalities are not. The truth is that the panchayats
and municipalities, the latter assisted by urban neighbourhoods, where the
sovereign people live are the real governments, while state and national

60
governments are mere representative governments handling state and national
level functions but mandated not to interfere in local matters.

14.8 According to a report in The Times of India, since 2004 India has lost
more lives to terrorism than any country other than Iraq. Cross border
terrorism, blamed for most attack on India is not the only threat to India’s
internal security. Several militant and insurgent outfits such as ULFA, NAXAL
and PWG are active in Northeast and other parts of India. The disputed
territory of Kashmir remains a tinderbox of conflict sixty years after
independence.

14.9 Let us assume that when the Allahabad High Court set aside Indira
Gandhi’s election, Rajeev and not Sanjay Gandhi was her advisor. On Rajiv’s
advice she may have advised the President of India to dissolve the parliament,
and institute amendments in the Constitution for empowering local governments.
She would then have won the election with thumping majority and set India on
the path of rejuvenation with social justice and equity! Rajiv apparently inherited
some of the values of his father Feroze Gandhi, a great parliamentarian sensitive
to the aspirations of the common people. History can play hide and seek
with nations. The “If it were so” in governance can be educative.

61
 Chapter 15
Improving Urban and Rural Quality
15.1 Many villages and towns in India had heritage and civic quality in
ancient times often superior to those in the West. The British rule neglected
them. It is ironic that centralised rule in independent India is abusing the
common people possibly more than even during the colonial rule. State politicians
in connivance with the state bureaucracy and contractors are forcibly acquiring
urban and rural land so also water systems and forests of villages as it was
during the colonial rule when in democracy they should be under local control.
An IAS officer is the chief executive of large municipalities while the elected
mayor is merely the speaker of the assembly, a titular head.

15.2 Such exploitative colonial practises need to be discarded and directly

elected mayors as the chief executive of the municipality should be
introduced in all states as already done in Madhya Pradesh by Digvijay
Singh former Chief Minister. The Indian Administrative Service, so also Indian
Police Service and Indian Forest Services designed to rule over the people
should be phased out, being incompatible with democracy. Elected heads
of the districts, called Janpads in ancient India and counties in the West,
should handle district level infrastructure and coordinate between the
panchayats and municipalities. Departmental heads of municipalities such
as for administration of justice, police, land, water systems, environment
and healthcare may as in good democracies be nominated by the mayor
and appointed with the approval of the civic assembly. If the opposition
points out any impropriety of the officials thus nominated, he or she cannot
be appointed. If the assembly approves the appointment, the mayor cannot
remove the official without the approval of the assembly! The departmental
heads thus become independent functionaries similar to an election
commissioner and act in the interest of the community. If a locally appointed
municipal official or judge is corrupt, he gets disgraced in the community
and may find himself compelled to relocate with his family to another district.
In villages, the Gram Sabha that is the village assembly shall take all decisions.
Villages thus virtually function as direct democracy. It is for this reason that
Gandhi laid great stress on village republics.

15.3 Delhi being the national capital has the privilege of large allocation of
funds and an Urban Arts Commission overseeing civic design. As a result it has
civic quality better than most other cities in India. However because of the
prevailing Delhi centric attitude, it has become over crowded and insecure.
Washington DC, the national capital, and state capitals such as Albany of
New York State, USA, are predominantly governance towns. Delhi should be

62
solely a national capital while activities such as Trade Fair, industry and sporting
facilities dispersed to other cities. This also applies to state capitals.

15.4 Centralisation of authority and abuse of local communities has led to

many disastrous consequences. Poverty and inadequacy of healthcare facilities
in villages has resulted in phenomenal increase in population and pervasive
environmental degradation. To meet emerging demands, the state is now
contemplating projects such as building large dams and diverting rivers.
Such projects will be prohibitively expensive and ironically are likely to create
more problems that solve them. India needs to first take corrective
democratisation reforms and then examine the options.

15.5 Delhi not only has access to large central grants but is also the only city
in India that has the privilege of an Urban Arts Commission. A Civic Arts
Commission needs to be instituted in every city and clusters of small towns
and villages, to oversee that their civic and heritage quality is not only restored
but also further enriched. The author’s lyric “Bharat tha sadeev, krishi pradhan
desh”, highlights that the soul of India has since ages been in its villages.
We need to rejuvenate our villages if urban India is to survive.

63
 Chapter 16
Nurturing Social Harmony
16.1 For nurturing inter faith social harmony, the discord over (1) Ram
Janmabhumi in Ayodhaya and (2) conversions by Christian missionaries to
Christianity need to be resolved. An ancient temple can be restored but one
demolished cannot be rebuilt, spiritually or archeologically. Just as Mahakal
Temple of Ujjain and Vaishno Devi temple of Jammu & Kashmir have been
brought under statutory trusts, Ram Janmabhumi in Ayodhya being a national
heritage should also be brought under a statutory trust. A damaged temple can
be renovated but one destroyed cannot be rebuilt, spiritually or archeologically.
We propose that the remnants of the Ram Mandir may be restored, and a “Ram
Darshan” developed in its precincts projecting through multimedia, visuals, dance
performances, posters and books, values that Ram stood for, and the
magnificence of Dharma that upholds respect for all faiths and offers a total
approach to humanism. A ‘Dharma Mandir’ (Temple of Dharma) with symbols
of all major faiths as expression of respect for all faiths that Dharma espouses
may also be instituted.

16.2 Conversion of Hindus to Christianity is fostering social discord leading to

assaults on Christian priests that give a bad name to Hindus. To curb religious
conversions that in the name of god foster violence and social discord, the
Author proposes that a law may be enacted that conversion of a person who is
not a High School (10th class) graduate to another faith shall be deemed to be
exploitation of poverty and while the person converted can pursue any faith, the
priest who solemnises such conversions shall be prosecuted for exploiting poverty.
We urge Christian and Muslim priesthood to follow the tenets of Dharma and for
god’s sake, not proselytise, a major cause of social conflict. Gandhi’s holistic
spirituality can be best called “Gandhitva”, a Sanskrit construct meaning values
that Gandhi stood for. It alone can rejuvenate the spiritual values that Bharat
stood for. Bharat that is India can then be declared a “Secular Gandhitva State”!

64
 Chapter 17
India’s Imperial Judiciary
17.1 During recent years, harassed citizens are frequently resorting to public
interest litigation. This has created a false impression that the judiciary alone
can now ensure good governance. With over forty million cases pending in
various courts and tribunals, and endemic corruption in lower judiciary, the
common people hardly have access to justice. The reason for this is that
based on colonial practises local judges are appointed by the state and
posted in and transferred to various districts. This fosters lack of
accountability. We need to discard such colonial practices and adopt
democratic practises as advocated by Gandhi and currently practised in the
best western democracies wherein the village council, municipality and the
district governments appoint local judges from amongst lawyers within their
jurisdiction, High Courts appoint their judges from amongst lawyers within
the state jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court selects and appoints its judges
from anywhere in the nation.

17.2 Another highly undesirable practice in India is that after retirement judges
are given assignments such as chairperson of various tribunals and commissions
of enquiry. Worst is that they can even seek election in the parliament. Such
practises make judges in service susceptible to compromising their objectivity.
As in good western democracies, judges of the superior courts may be appointed
for life and debarred from appointment to any office by the state if they choose
to relinquish office earlier.

17.3 India is still wedded to Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence introduced by the

British. We need to revert to Indian jurisprudence that lays greater emphasis
on rehabilitation than on retribution. The Supreme Court judges have recently
dropped the prefix ‘Your Lordship’, a legacy of the colonial rule. The dress code
of judges and lawyers also need to be reviewed and options based on Indian
colour codes considered. Our jails are usually poorly maintained and often get
highly congested by influx of under trial prisoners in large numbers. As in
countries such as Australia, private jails may be introduced in which their
promoters will charge the prisoners for lodging and catering and the state will
provide security. Under trial prisoners other than those involved in heinous
crimes who are willing to pay the tariff, can be lodged in such jails. Since the
number of under trial prisoners is usually large, this will considerably relieve
pressure on state jails, and make them liveable for convicts awarded long term
punishments. It will also facilitate reform of convicts and curb homosexual
and lesbian abuse.

17.4 Public Interest Litigation: PILs are mushrooming in India since

65
under our centralised polity the elected servants of the people frequently abuse
authority. Such abuse will get drastically reduced once true democracy as
advocated by Gandhi and practised in the best democracies is instituted.

17.5 Superior courts to initiate democratization reforms: It is the

Dharma that is duty of the superior courts to oversee that rights of the sovereign
people are not in any way violated. A Constitution is not a sacred scripture, but
just a law —- good or bad. The superior courts ought to have realised that an
anti people Constitution based on exploitative colonial practises was imposed
on the people and authenticated in their name in criminal breach of their trust.
Realising this, they ought to have taken suo-moto cognizance of the abuse and
taken steps to rectify it. They have not only failed to understand the true spirit
of democracy, but have also been ignoring petitions on (1) illegitimacy of the
Constitution authenticated in the name of the people in breach of their trust, and
(2) non enforcement of the Panchayati Raj constitutional amendments initiated
by Rajiv Gandhi. Instead, they have been behaving as super administrators
issuing diktats on demolition of illegal buildings and removal of slum dwellers,
many of them from Bangladesh, ignoring international protocols on refugee
rights.

17.6 To save India from drifting into anarchy, further balkanisation and all round
social and environmental degeneration, the Author urges the Superior Courts to
dwell on these issues and as endorsed by Justice MN Venkatachaliah, a former
revered Chief Justice of India, initiate the process of instituting true democracy
through the referendum process.

66
 Chapter 18
Reforms suiting tropical
Ecology and/or Productivity
18.1 Flawed Academic Year: Suffering colonial mindset, we are still wedded
to the academic year with vacation in summer months introduced by the British
to enable them to visit Britain with their families during the festive summer
months of Britain. To suit our tropical ecology, our academic year needs to be
such that vacation is in the festive winter months from say November 15 to
January 15 so that our youth may partake in active sports or travel to absorb
nature and culture during our festive winter months while studying indoors under
fans or work in air conditioned computer rooms during the hostile summer
months. Our rural youth can then assist their parents in agriculture during the
winter months. Hostels vacant during the festive winter months are likely to
earn several hundred million rupees every year as tourist accommodation that
can be utilised to support education, sports and scholarships to needy students.
Presently hostels lie neglected during summer months and need extensive
repairs when academic years commence!

18.2 Flawed Financial Year: The British introduced the financial year
April 1 to March 31 in India to match with that in Britain. It is appropriate for
Britain’s temperate zone where the engineers get an uninterrupted working
season from April 1 to the time when it starts snowing. Based on our tropical
ecology, our financial year should be from say, October 2 to October 1, so
that our engineers get an uninterrupted working season, make payments
and design projects during the rainy months, and close accounts on October
2, after disbursing the salary for September on October 1. On the Author
proposing such a financial year, Digvijay Singh the then Chief Minister Madhya
Pradesh proposed it to the then Union Finance Minister. He got a bureaucratic
reply that such a proposal had been considered by a committee of Secretaries
and was not considered necessary! The Union minister apparently realised
that such reforms may lead to bigger democratisation reforms and evaded the
issue.

18.3 Adopting million-billion system: The world community should thank

Hindus for inventing the zero and scale of ten. In the now globalising world we
may replace our traditional lakh-crore system, by the now globally prevalent
million, billion system, to standardise accounting and avoid delays and confusion.

18.4 Rationalising Government Holidays: As in the West, we have now

adopted Saturdays as holidays. With one month leave earned every year,
ten days casual leave, a large number of holidays of various faiths, birth and

67
death anniversaries of national leaders, and for all Saturdays and Sundays
the nation now hardly works! The leave of one month should include casual
leave. Moreover, whenever a weekday happens to be a holiday, the Saturday
in that week may be made a working day.

18.5 Government Houses in Hill Stations: The white skin of the British
could not sustain the hostile summer months in India. They built a Viceregal
Lodge in Shimla for the Viceroy, Government Houses for the Governors and
bungalows for ministers and civil servants in states with hill stations. After
independence the Viceregal Lodge was made a research institute. It deteriorated
for lack of adequate maintenance funds. Just as palaces in Rajasthan and
other states have been leased as heritage hotels, the Vice-regal Lodge,
Government Houses of State Governors and bungalows of ministers and
bureaucrats in hill stations may be leased to hoteliers. The President and Vice
President of India, Governors of States, ministers and bureaucrats as well as
tourists can stay in these hotels that will not only earn revenue for the government
but will also ensure that they are properly conserved and maintained.

18.7 State residence for Ministers, legislators & civil servants: As in

USA, official residence may be provided only for the chief executive of the
national and state governments. Ministers and legislators may as in USA
be given appropriate lodging allowance for the period they are required to be
in the capital. All government accommodation except for the chief executives
should be disinvested. District Governors, City Mayors, Village counsellors
and the local bureaucracy should naturally live in their personal homes as in
western democracies.

68
 Chapter 19
One World Education & Temples of Dharma

19.1 Contemporary education equips the youth in humanities and sciences

but does not inculcate values —- a vital component of education. Development
Alternatives has launched an initiative to promote university campuses “One
World Education” with numerous common facilities such as an auditorium,
open air theatre, lecture halls, library, guest house and sporting facilities such
as swimming pool, tennis and squash, in which various private trusts will book
space for different academic programmes bound by the motto “Science with
Spirituality for a Just World Order”. To articulate the motto there shall be three
anchor institutions, namely, (1) Science Spirituality Experience, (2) School of
Creative Arts, and (3) School of Traditional Science. Based on the writings of
Vivekanand, Einstein and Gandhi, spirituality can be best defined as the
relationship of the individual with the society, other life forms and the environment.
Thus while religion inculcates personal ethics, spirituality nurtures secular
societal ethics. A multimedia “Science Spirituality Experience” will be made to
inculcate such values especially amongst our youth. Such value-based education
is essential for nurturing responsible communities nurturing a sustainable world
order based on social justice and equity. The first campus of One World Education
is likely to be instituted in Jattari village near Taj Airport and Aviation Hub on
main road from Delhi to Aligarh at Jewar.

19.2 Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts & Culture (IGNCA) was
established with great fanfare at a prime location in New Delhi as a research
institution focusing on Indian arts and culture. For want of a legitimate programme
and heavily dependent on grants from the government, the institution has been
languishing. There is now an emerging need for universities that impart quality
interdisciplinary education in both humanities and modern sciences and also
inculcates ethics amongst our youth. This has become a matter of great urgency
because after the opening of our economy to the global market, our traditional
value system is breaking down and our youth is indulging in vices such as drug
abuse and unsafe sex. Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts may be upgraded
as a university titled “Indira Gandhi One World Education” bound by the motto
“Science with Spirituality for a Just World Order”. A great advantage will be that
through the fees earned it will become self-sustaining and productive and the
government will not be required to dole out taxpayers money to sustain it. A
Dharma Mandir described in the next section can also be instituted in its precincts.

19.3 Dharma Mandir: For inculcating amongst our youth the values
espoused by Dharma especially of respect for all faith, creatively designed
posters titled “Dharma Mandir” with symbols of all faiths and a statement of the

69
values that Dharma stands for may be displayed in Town Halls, schools, colleges,
cultural centres, hospitals, railway stations, airports and other public places for
sensitizing the people especially the youth about the universal brotherhood
that Dharma espouses. A poster “Seven Commandments of Dharma” that
highlights the values that Dharma espouses can also be displayed.

Hkxoku ,d] uke vusd

God One, Name Many
lUrks"k dqekj 'kekZ &
1- rw gh jkeA 2- rw gh eksfttA 3- rw gh lwQh;ksa ds lkabZA
rq gh d`".kA rw gh cq)A rq gh bZalkA rw gh eksgEenA rq gh flD[kksa ds xq:A rw gh cgkbZmYykA
rw gh egkchjAA rw gh tksgjk"VªAA rw gh xka/khAA
4- rsjk lans'k gS çseA
rw gS Hkkjr dk vkse] eqlyeku dk vkehu] bZlkb dk vehu
tc tc v/keZ c<+rk gS] rw vkrk gSAA
5- rw gh eafnj esa] efLtn esa] fxjtk esaA 6- rw gh i'kqi{kh esa] feêh] ty ou esaA
rw gh lc ds fnyksa esaAA leÙkk yksdra= rw gh lc ds fnyksa esaAA
dUs n
jkT; z
k
fty

dsUnz] jkT;] ftyk

lc xzke dh lsok esa

7- tc Hkxoku gS ,d] rks dkgs djs erHksnA

tkxks /keZ ds j{kdks] tkxks] lc /keksZa dk djks lEekuA
jke jkt gh gS xzke LojktA tc jkt djsxk xzke] Hkkjr cusxk egkuA

People firsT
instituing good governance

Managing Trustee: SK Sharma

111/9-Z, Kishangarh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110070, India. Tel.: 91 (11) 2613-4103, 2689-0380, Res.: 2647-1516,
Fax : 2613-0817 Email: peoplefirst@devalt.org
Visit our website: www.peoplefirstindia.org for more information or downloding this document.

19.4 For solving problems in democracy, politicians are using tools such as (1)
treat communities as subjects, not citizens, (2) mix politics with religion to
divide communities, (3) give false hopes to tribal and other backward communities
through promises and reservations, (4) claim that they are servants of the people
but behave as masters, (5) misuse state bureaucracy designed for colonial
rule, (6) work for the rich and give empty promises to the poor, (7) allow the rich
to abuse their wealth, and their youth to flout the law, (8) listen to middle
income groups who criticise all but themselves, (9) abuse farmers so much so
that when crops fail they commit suicide, (10) perpetuate abuse of urban slum
dwellers and rural landless, (11) brand ULFA, NAXAL & PWG as militants when
they are truly freedom fighters, and (12) keep the conflict with Pakistan brewing.
It is obvious that such tools often used by our colonial rulers cannot solve
problems in democracy. Only tools of democracy such as empowered local
communities and accountability to the people can. We request all those who

70
mean well for India to ensure that the Dharma
of the state and the Dharma of the business
are enforced.

19.5 M.V. Gandhimohan was born during

Gandhi’s hundredth birth century. To
commemorate it his parents named him
Gandhimohan. He authored a book
“Mahatma Gandhi and the Baha’is” with
subtitle: “Striving towards a Non violent Civilisation”. His association with
Baha’i faith began when he was in his teens. He learnt from the Baha’i belief
that the world religions are different parts of a single progressive process of
divine revelation. This resonated well with Gandhi’s vision that the truth is
one. His background was statistical physics that deals with macroscopic
phenomena that emerge from the interaction of many microscopic
components. Near this critical point the fluctuation get correlated no matter
how the distance. As this continues the correlation becomes weaker and
eventually the entire system changes to a new ordered state. Such
transformations also lead to a spiritual civilisation ordered and governed
globally through independent institutions of planetary scope. Baha’is faith
demonstrates that such perceptions unite people. On the other hand
centralisation creates large income disparities, divides communities, leads
to over consumption of the resources of the earth, and fosters aberrations
such as global warming.

71
 Chapter 20
India leaves Bharat behind
20.1 A recent report in Hindustan Times titled “India leaves Bharat behind”,
observes “Wheels of progress grind on. While Indian cities shine, rural India is
still in the dark”. As highlighted earlier, a centralised democracy is worse than
dictatorship since the greed of the numerous big and small politicians can never
get satiated. Events such as the bomb blasts in the peace train to Pakistan
confirm that the only solution is to democratically empower the people. If we do
not institute true democracy soon, Kashmir will get further destabilised,
violent movements such as ULFA, NAXAL & PWG will become increasingly
aggressive, and crime especially against women will become pervasive,
culminating in anarchy like conditions. India presently surrounded by failing
states, will itself become a failed state. It may then be too late to institute
any political reforms.

20.2 During Mahabharat, Krishna said, “Whenever injustice becomes

unbearable, I come again and again”. He came as Mahaveer, Buddha, Moses,
Christ, Zoharastra, Mohammad, Sikh gurus, as Bahaiullah in the nineteenth
century, and as Gandhi in the twentieth century. Vested interests ignored
Gandhi. Bharat got destroyed again. Its sprit is still alive —- but dormant.
Let us rejuvenate it.

20.3 As reaction to India’s exploitative polity, some of its unemployed

educated youth have joined violent movements such as ULFA, NAXAL &
PWG. Their methods are wrong but their demand, so also that of Tamil
Tigers of Sri Lanka and Maoists of Nepal, for their democratic right of local
control over local resources, is right. If granted they will join the mainstream
of society for nation building. They are truly freedom fighters!

20.4 Nepal, the only Hindu state in the world is in turmoil. Ignoring Nepal’s
rich Hindu spiritual heritage, its politicians adopted the flawed Westminster
system and centralised polity of big bad brother India, with the result that it is
now on the brink of becoming a failed state. On the other hand, Indonesia is
a unique Muslim state in which Hindus from Bihar pursuing traditional Hindu
values, rituals and lifestyle in Bali Islands coexist with Islam and respect
each other! India and Nepal need to learn from the Indonesian experience.

20.5 Lloyd & Susanne Rudolph, in their book “Post Modern Gandhi: Gandhi
in the World & at Home” argue against equating Gandhi with traditionalism, and
instead read him as post modern. They contend that Gandhi’s critique of modern
civilisation in his book ‘Hind Swaraj’ published in 1909 was an opening salvo of

72
the post-modern era. His story of ‘My experiments with truth’ and his theory
and practice of non-violent collective action ‘satyagraha’, articulate and exemplify
such a post-modern situational understanding of truth.

73
 Chapter 21
The Bogey of Economic Boom
21.1 US based Mira Kamdar in her book “Planet India” with subtitle “How the
fastest growing Democracy is transforming the World” observes that until this
century the Indo-US relations were almost exclusively a people to people
affair. Business and political relationships were negligible. She says India
now has attractively landscaped high rise apartment buildings and shopping
malls mushrooming in major cities, massive subway networks, and
automobiles of most global makes on roads with numerous flyovers. India now,
she adds, has the best business schools, businesses are speedily expanding
and the economy is booming. She also speaks of the plight of African
Americans in USA and the positive impact Gandhiji’s methods had on their
liberation.

21.2 Mira then dwells on her travel in rural India and the miserable plight of
Indian villages. She laments that while India’s educated urban elite and large
landowners are enjoying the country’s economic boom, millions of Indian farming
families are struggling. If rains fail they have to pay debts such as for seed and
fertilizer loans with no food for their family. This has made the future of Indian
farmers so grim that they exert the only power they have left over their fate —-
they kill themselves. Since 1997, Mira says, more than twenty-five thousand
Indian farmers have committed suicide! As opposed to this, in USA and other
western democracies the state provides support to farmers and if needed off
farm jobs too.

21.3 As reports of suicide by farmers in Vidharbha a region in East

Maharashtra were hitting the Indian press, Mira got a call from a journalist
friend Dilip D’souza in Mumbai who invited her to join a trip to rural India.
They boarded a train in Mumbai, slept in it, and when she woke up she was
back in the India that she saw before the economic boom. The vast
landscape rolled past with dusty towns and villages. Seventy percent of
India’s population lives in rural India. There are 120 million farming families
living in six hundred thousand villages. The East India Company had ruthlessly
exploited India’s farmers and weavers. The situation today is worse.

21.4 Mira then dwells on India’s water crisis. With its population increasing
by 18 million every year and high economic growth, India already has a severe
water crisis that threatens to become much worse. The World Bank is
projecting that household water use in urban India will double by 2025. Urban,
industrial and agriculture interests are locked in struggle with small farmers,
resulting in violent confrontations across the country. Construction of large

74
water reservoirs through dams raise problems of rehabilitation of families
who get displaced. Nirupa Bhangar, an ex microbiology teacher, told Mira
that scores of villages in Gujarat were afflicted with acute poisoning from too
much fluoride in their water. Though India claims self-sufficiency in food
more people in India go hungry than any other single country. While politicians
claim that India is shining, the truth is that it is decaying.

21.5 The Author requests Mira Kamdar and through her US based Indians,
Hindu organisations and other well meaning citizens, to launch a internet and
media campaign that India is a fake democracy abusing its common people,
and that the UN, USA and other developed nations should impose sanctions
and trade barriers against India and other third world nations that are abusing
their people, until they institute true democracy as advocated by Gandhi
through the referendum process.

21.6 Economist Praful Bidwai of Global Information Network website:

www.globalinfo.org, in a study titled “India’s Bubble Economy booms, as poverty
grows”, published in Asia Times of March 17, 2000, presents a grim picture of
the Indian economy. The study observes that in 1990s India added more than
a million individuals to the list of millionaires. One of them, Azim Premji, emerged
as the world’s second wealthiest man for his share holdings in an information
technology firm. But market capitalisation on the Bombay Stock Exchange
has risen at an unbelievable 100 per cent a year. Bidwai then dwells on the
various manners in which the economic parameters interact and laments
that 56 million more Indians sank below the official poverty line defined in
terns of pure animal level survival and consuming the minimum number of
calories necessary to stay alive —- a shame in any democracy!

21.7 Praful Bidwai rightly highlights that macro-economically India is back

to the critical situation of 1991, which triggered severe neo-liberal restructuring.
Former Congress finance minister Chidambaram, himself a committed neo-
liberal, estimated the fiscal deficit at 8.3 percent. With the government
going bankrupt, public services are collapsing, often hitting the poor. The
government is cutting spending on rural development including agriculture
programmes, as well as on healthcare, drinking water, basic education and
sanitation. According to Bidwai income growth in rural areas where 70
percent Indians live that averaged 3.1 percent in 1980, has sharply declined
to 1.8 percent. Infant mortality rates are rising even in states such as
Kerala and Maharashtra that have relatively good social indicators. But
luxury consumption is booming within the upper crust. These contrasting
economic features were further accentuated in the recent national budget.
The finance minister failed to tax the rich and took the easy option of borrowing
raising its target by almost 40 percent. He also raised the prices of wheat

75
and rice sold through India’s rickety public distribution system to the officially
recognised poor by a cruel 68 percent at one go in the name of cutting
subsidies, IMF style. But he doled out concessions to the thriving information
technology, communications and entertainment sectors by exempting or
cutting taxes on export profits, computer chips, cellular phones, satellite
equipment, etc. He raised India’s already bloated military expenditure by
28.2 percent, the highest such increase in a single year. Today defence
spending exceeds total public and private expenditure on primary education
by 68 percent. The mere increase in military spending, Bidwai concludes,
exceeds the centre’s investment in health, education and social welfare.

21.8 Since mid 1990’s, Bidwai observes, a new class of upward mobile,
high income, professionals has crystallised in a handful of cities that have
aspirations of first world lifestyle. Today, young graduates from management
schools command salaries as high as $ 120,000 a year. Such huge
disposable incomes are being spent on luxury items, consumer goods and
cars. Following this class in its aspirations, the hundreds of thousands of
middle-income people are on a spending spree lubricated by liberal credit.
India’s information technology sector has burgeoned into a six billion dollar
business. Its exports roughly $ 4.5 billion are small volume, just 1.5 percent of
the global software market and in relation to India’s 400 billion GDP. But the
information technology hype is enormous, driven by wild speculation on the
stock market, itself buoyed up by the government through numerous concessions.
Such growth cannot last. Sooner or later, the bubble will burst. The reality will
then dawn on, Bidwai concludes, widespread deprivation. According to the
Author, merely lamenting over the past will not take us anywhere. We need to
evolve a process by which course correction can be done.

76
 Chapter 22
Sovereign Rights Commission:
A unique initiative
22.1 Power having got centralised, the political system is now unwilling to
revert it to the people. If some politicians express desire to do so, the majority
over rule them. The only legal method by which true egalitarian democracy can
now be instituted is by the sovereign people themselves through referendum.
Referendum is the supreme sovereign right of the people intrinsic to democracy
and exists even if not provided for in a constitution. Some years ago in Britain
whose practises India follows, Tony Blair instituted through referendum the
parliaments of Scotland, Wales and Ireland and reinstated the position of Mayor
of London abolished by former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Tony Blair
won the good will of the people and got re-elected. The citizens of many
western nations enjoy the right to referendum since long.

22.2 Illiteracy in India poses difficulties in initiating referendums. To overcome

such problems, as described earlier, People First has conceptualised that apart
from parliament and an independent judiciary, democracy needs another
institution, an independent “Sovereign Rights Commission” with authority to
direct referendums, except on issues fundamental to democracy or the integrity
of the nation. There can, for example, be no referendum on making the state
theocratic or a region seceding. Superior to the royal priest of bygone days,
more like Gandhi, such a commission will function as the non-corruptible
conscience keeper of the state based on the values of the society as a whole.
It is thus not a new but an age old institution with historical legitimacy, in a form
suiting contemporary needs. To reduce governance overheads, the National &
State Human Rights Commissions can be upgraded as Sovereign Rights
Commissions, their functions being compatible.

22.3 Based on the wishes ascertained from the vast majority common people,
the Commission at the national level assisted by those at the state level will,
prepare a proposed Constitution that is likely to be very similar to that proposed
by Gandhi, and refer the present versus proposed Constitution to the people
through referendum. The people will evidently overwhelmingly vote in favour of
the proposed Constitution. The Commission at the national level will thereupon
authenticate it, this time truly in the name of the people, as the supreme law of
India. Assisted by the Commissions at the state level, the Commission at the
national level will then appropriately phase the reforms and monitor that they are
properly instituted. Bharat that is India will be on the path of rejuvenation with
social justice and equity. Once such true democracy is instituted, human
rights violations will become minimal. The people of all nation states including

77
USA and Britain are likely to demand such reforms that nurture an egalitarian
economic system, thus heralding the emergence of a sustainable world order
based on social justice and equity.

22.4 A recent report in Hindustan Times, August 8, 2007, titled ‘A third of us

Indians live on Rs 20 a day’ observes that government surveys throws up
shocking statistics on poverty in India”. Rs 20/- a day, the study observes, can
essentially buy the family its daily sustenance. Technically a large chunk of
these 836 million Indians, 77 per cent of India’s population, are said to be
above the poverty line! This is clearly based on manipulated statistics.

22.5 The people of Kashmir have been demanding autonomy within the
Indian Union. What they are demanding is their democratic right of local
control over local resources. Once thus empowered, they will repulse all
overtures of Pakistan. And our youth who have joined violent movements
such as ULFA, NAXAL & PWG will join the mainstream of society for nation
building.

22.6 People’s Movement for Democracy: Once in Utah State in USA,

its citizens lowered the national flag at half mast, as protest against certain
decisions of the then President of USA that were not acceptable to them.
Until some years ago, based on colonial practises only the state could fly
the National Flag. Since through a constitutional amendment citizens now
have the right to fly the national flag at their homes and places of work, they
also have the right to fly it at half-mast. The Author invites citizens who wish
well for India to launch nationwide marches with the national flag at half
mast as protest against children dying of starvation and farmers committing
suicide in villages, reciting the Author’s lyric “India ko Bharat banao” and
demanding Sovereign Rights Commissions with authority to direct referendums
to facilitate democratisation reforms.

78
 Chapter 23
Reunification of India, Pakistan & Bangladesh
23.1 Revisiting Gandhi’s Solution: To undo the harm inflicted by partition
on the common people of both India and Pakistan, it is proposed that based on
the “Gandhi Solution” described in Chapter 8, section 8.24, after we have instituted
directly elected chief executives at local, state and national levels, we may
invite the then President of Pakistan to be the first President and chief executive
of reunited India for one term. He will equitably nominate from the various states
of reunited India his team of ministers who are not members of the parliament or
a state legislature. On completing his term, he can be offered appointment for
one term as chairman of the upper house called Egalitarian Council (see section
24.4). Similarly the Prime Minister then of Bangladesh may be invited to be the
first Governor and chief executive of the reunited state of Bengal. He too will
equitability nominate from the various constituencies of the reunited state of
Bengal his team of ministers. On completing his term, he can be offered
appointment for one term as chairperson of the Egalitarian Council of the State
of Bengal. After such initial reunification, all citizens of reunited India can seek
elections every five years.

23.2 China & Tibet: After collapse of the Soviet Union, China then a socialist
nation, opened its economy to the global market, but is still governed by the
communist party. With a single party government and rightist economy,
China is now a fascist nation and can like Hitler’s Germany one day become
a threat to global peace. People First requests the United Nations to pressurise
China to democratize its polity and declare the Kashmir-Tibet region an
autonomous state and spiritual capital of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Sikhism
and Sufism, similar to that
Vatican is for Christianity. The
Kashmir-Tibet region will then
attract nature and spiritual
tourism from all over the world,
spreading the message of love
and peace. Universal Peace
Federation and Inter-religious
and International Federation for
World Peace have conferred the
award “Ambassador of Peace” on
the Author. The award will have
meaning only if true egalitarian
democracy as advocated by Gandhi is instituted.

79
 Chapter 24
Key features of the proposed Constitution
24.1 Based on the analysis in the earlier Chapters, the Author has prepared
a proposed “Constitution for Free Bharat (India) 2000” and published it on its
website: www.peopolefirstindia.org. Some of its key provisions are outlined
below.

24.2 President, Mayors, District and Village heads: The candidates

shall first seek nomination as President and Vice President as a team in an
in-party election as in USA, and then in the national election. The President
thus directly elected shall be the chief executive of India. After getting
elected, the President shall nominate his team of ministers not exceeding a
stipulated number. The Vice President shall as in USA be ex officio
Chairperson of the lower house of parliament, and will keep the President
briefed on its deliberations. Freed of meetings of the parliament, the President
will have ample time to attend to his diverse executive functions. The district,
city and village heads too will be directly elected. They will nominate their
departmental heads whose appointment will be approved by their legislatures.
The departmental heads will thus become directly accountable to their people.

24.3 Sovereign Rights Commission: As already discussed, the Constitution

shall provide for independent Sovereign Rights Commissions at national and
state levels with authority to direct referendums, except on issues fundamental
to democracy or the integrity of the nation. To reduce governance overheads,
the Human Rights Commissions may be upgraded as Sovereign Right
Commissions, their functions being compatible.

24.4 Egalitarian Council: The Rio Conference on sustainable development

held in 1991 recommended that to resolve conflicts between different interest
groups, there is need of multi stakeholder councils composed of representatives
of different interest groups such as the youth, women, farmers, farm labour,
religions, small, medium & large industries and their labour, and nominee of
selected disciplines such as architects, engineers, doctors, artists and military
ex-servicemen. Such councils can be effective only if they are a part of mainstream
governance. The upper houses of parliament, presently intended in India to
accommodate politicians who cannot win elections to the lower house, may be
upgraded as multi-stakeholder councils called Sarvodaya Parishad in Hindi and
Egalitarian Council in English. Similar Egalitarian Councils shall be instituted
as the upper house at the state level. The mandate of such Egalitarian Councils
will be to resolve conflicts between different interest groups, and if a consensus
could not be reached, refer the unresolved issues to the people for decision

80
through referendum. To prevent self seekers nominated in such councils using
it as a stepping stone for politics, its members shall have to give an undertaking
that they shall not join any political party as a member, seek election in any
legislature or hold an office of profit under any government. Such Egalitarian
Councils will facilitate an egalitarian economic system, truly capitalism with a
human face, nurturing a sustainable world order founded on social justice and
equity. There will then, as Gandhi said, be enough for everyone’s need,
but not for their greed’!

24.5 Rationalising the election process: Power having got aligned in two
parties in USA, the party that secures majority votes governs. India has unity in
its rich diversity and as such has a large number of regional political parties. As
a consequence the winning candidate usually gets less than fifty percent votes.
To deal with this, the Author proposes that the election laws may provide that
voters can vote for a candidate as first option and another as second option.
Most voters usually vote for a candidate of their region as first preference and a
national level candidate as second preference. If no candidate with first option
gets majority vote, the second vote will be counted and the one who then secures
largest number of votes will be declared elected. The more complex process of
single transferable vote can be adopted, if considered more appropriate.

24.6 Bonus Share for Charitable Purposes: To nurture a truly egalitarian

society, the Constitution may provide that whenever the shares of any joint
stock company increase by the face value of a share, a certain percentage, say
twenty percent of the increase, shall have to be put in bonus shares for charitable
purposes. Both the company and the shareholders will thus statutorily contribute
to charity, thus nurturing a truly egalitarian society. It shall be mandatory for
their chartered accountants to over see that this is not violated. Other
methods to institutionalise charity can also be explored.

24.7 State Bureaucracy: All India services namely IAS, IPS and Indian
Forest Service and state services such as Deputy Collector, State police
officer and State forest officer are institutions of an imperial rule. Being
inconsistent with democracy, they must be phased out. To ensure
accountability to the people, every government, local, state and national,
shall appoint its bureaucracy from amongst persons within its jurisdiction
with the approval of the local assembly, as currently practised in good
democracies such as USA. To illustrate, a person elected mayor will appoint
a lands officer, head of police and other departmental heads from amongst
persons within his/her jurisdiction whose appointment shall be approved by
the local assembly. If the opposition points out some improprieties of the
person nominated, he/she cannot be appointed. If the opposition approves
the appointment, the mayor cannot remove him/her without the consent of

81
the opposition! The police and other departmental heads thus become
independent functionaries directly accountable to the people, similar to an
election commissioner.

24.8 Chief of Defence Staff: As in good Western democracies, there

shall be a Chief of Defence consisting of heads of the chiefs of the army,
navy and air force, headed by the Army Chief. It shall control the armed
forces and advise the Defence Minister on key issues‘. The Chief of Defence
shall replace the IAS defence secretary who presently is advisor to the
Defence Minister.

24.9 Imposing sanctions and trade barriers on flawed democracies:

Nations such as India and Pakistan have instituted pseudo democracies
with centralised authority and the flawed Westminster system that fosters
self-seeking coalition politics. Subterfuges such as instituting directly elected
president above the prime minister adopted in France, Germany and Sri
Lanka do not legitimise the Westminster system. With a single party
government and rightist economic model, China is now a fascist nation.
The Author requests the United Nations to analyse these issues, lay down
norms and standards of democratic governance, and impose sanctions and
trade barriers against those that do not adhere to such norms.

82
 Chapter 25
Global Warming
25.1 Global warming, and its threat to survival of all life forms on the earth,
is being debated since long. Development Alternatives, an associate of
People First, has been doing intensive
studies about its impact especially in South
Asia. Al Gore, former Vice President of
U S A
has recently written a book “An
Inconvenient Truth”. His main thrust is that
industrial development fueled by scientific
research is leading to release of increasing
quantities of carbon dioxide that
accumulates in the
atmosphere. This
creates green house effect curbing carbon dioxide
emissions from going out of the atmosphere thus
fostering global warming and climate change. If this
continues it will lead to melting of snow, recurring
hurricanes and tsunamis and bring about major changes
in climate that may make the earth hostile to all life
forms. We need to take corrective measures before it
is too late.

25.2 One of Gandhi’s famous statements is “There is

enough in this world for everybody’s needs, but not for
greed”. Drawing inspiration from this statement, the Author holds that we need
to institute in all nation states true egalitarian democracy as practiced in ancient
India symbolized in Ram Raj, articulated by Gandhi as village republics. Currently
practiced in some democracies such as Switzerland, Holland and Scandinavian
countries, such egalitarian democracy can enforce standards of acceptable
consumption of greenhouse effect creating industries. If instituted in all nation
states, such egalitarian democracy will be an antidote to global warming and
climate change. We request UNO to impose sanctions and trade barriers
against nations that fail to institute such truly egalitarian democracy within a
stipulated period.

26.4 As mentioned earlier, power having got centralised no political party

wants to let go of it. According to the author the only method by which true
egalitarian democracy with empowered local governments and directly elected
chief executives at all levels as advocated by Gandhi and practised in the

83
best democracies of the world such as in Switzerland, Holland, Scandinavian
countries and but for unbridled capitalism in USA, can now be instituted is
by the sovereign people themselves through referendum. To facilitate
referendums, People First has conceptualised that apart from parliament
and an independent judiciary, democracy needs another institution, an
independent Sovereign Rights Commission with authority to direct
referendums except on issues fundamental to democracy or the integrity of
the nation. There can, for example be no referendum on making the state
theocratic or a region seceding. Superior to the Royal Priest of bygone
days, more like Gandhi, such as commission will function as the non
corruptible conscience keeper of the state based on the values of the society
as a whole. It is thus not a new institution but an old one with historical
legitimacy in a form suiting contemporary needs. On the basis of wishes
expressed by the vast majority common people it will prepare a proposed
constitution that will be very similar to that advocated by Gandhi and refer it
to the people through referendum. The people will overwhelmingly vote in
favour of the proposed constitution. It will then authenticate it, this time truly,
in the name of the people as the supreme law of the nation. India will be on
the path of rejuvenation with social justice and equity.

84
 Chapter 26
Experiences of the Author as a Civil Servant

26.1 My parents hailed from Punjab. My father joined the State forest service
in Madhya Pradesh and worked under British officers. My father’s elder brother,
an engineer from Roorkee Engineering College, got scholarship for higher
studies in Britain. On his return trip, he felt ill on the ship and died. The
responsibility of looking after his widow and two sons fell on my father. My
mother was a charming lady. She did not know English but learnt enough to
communicate with the British officers and their wives. I was born on September
13, 1933 in Alapalli a forest village in Chanda district in Madhya Pradesh,
now in Maharastra renamed Chandrapur. With every transfer, my father got me
upgraded to a higher class with the result that I completed my High School
at age of 13 in a small town Betul where my father was posted as District
Forest Officer in 1947. We celebrated India’s Independence that year.

26.2 I did Masters in Mathematics from College of Science, Nagpur, and stood
first in the university. Since I could not take the IAS examination because of
age, I joined as a lecturer in the same College. I taught for nearly three years.
I was rated a good teacher so much so that the students went on strike when
the Head of Department assigned me another class. My method was simple.
I explained the logic, not merely the solution, and kept the tempo such that the
good students did not lose interest and the mediocre could understand it.

26.3 I stood second in the All India Competitive Examination, opted for the
Indian Foreign Service and on the request of my father, joined the Indian
Administrative Service in 1956. My first assignment in the IAS was as
trainee in the IAS Training Institute in Metcalfe House in Delhi. Gaylord was
then the only good restaurant in Connaught Place. We frequently visited
Gaylord in a rickety car hired from the canteen owner of the academy. We
displayed a placard in our hostel rooms “What the good Lord giveth, the
Gaylord taketh”. One summer evening we returned from Gaylord late in the
night. Seeing other probationers sleeping on beds in the lawns, I delicately
removed half the moustaches of a probationer, Jamshed Kanga. We were
having breakfast in the dining room when Kanga walked in after having removed
the other half of his moustaches. We all had a good laugh. Pointing at me
he said that one day he would remove my eyebrows. A sporting person, he
never did. Ours was the last batch to be trained in the IAS Academy in
Metcalfe House in Delhi after which it shifted to Mussorie, a hill station. Our
batch was invited in 2006 for a retreat get together on completion of fifty
years since joining IAS. My lyric “India ko Bharat banao” was appreciated
by many of my colleagues, but not endorsed.

85
26.4 On completion of training, RP Kapoor, a good friend of mine, and I were
posted as Trainee Officers in Jabalpur. RP Noronha ICS was the Commissioner
of Jabalpur division and MS Chaudhary IAS the Collector of Jabalpur District.
Noronha disliked cigarettes smoked bidis. He was a keen shekari earlier of
tigers, in later days of ducks. MS Chaudhary treated us as his family. We were
attached to various sections of the Collector’s office to understand their
functioning. The office superintendent of the collector gave me a big folder titled
“Standing Orders” containing orders of a permanent nature issued by various
Collectors from time to time since British days. It struck me as a good concept.
Wherever I got posted, be it SDO, Collector, Transport Commissioner, Secretary
to Government, Divisional Commissioner, and in public sector undertakings
such as Delhi Transport Corporation and HUDCO, I introduced this practise. It
standardised practises, facilitated good management and reduced corruption.
Jabalpur had a military cantonment and a Narmada Club dominated by civil and
military officers. We frequently visited it. Once Kapoor and I had gone on tour
to some villages and were returning in my car. We stopped on the roadside to
relax and lit cigarettes. Before we knew, a swarm of bees in hives on the trees
above angered by the smoke attacked us. We ran on the road tarmac with our
orderly beating the bees on us by the branch from a tree. The bees relished
Kapoor more. He became unconscious and had to be rushed straight to a
hospital in Jabalpur. Running on the hot tarmac without shoes, I got away with
blisters on my feet. Moral of the story is “smoking is injurious for health”. I have
given up smoking —- Kapoor has not. I got married in Agra were my father in
law, KK Sharma, IAS, was Municipal Commissioner.

26.5 After the training in Jabalpur, I was posted as Sub Divisional officer
Neemuch, a quaint cantonment town suited as a honeymoon posting. It
had a cantonment club where I played tennis and bridge, and my wife played
rummy. To augment the city water supply, acquisition of land of some farmers
was required. They were upset. I gave them liberal compensation. The
farmers were happy, so was the local MLA. Our eldest daughter was born
on February 29, 1960 in Agra, a leap year child.

26.6 My next assignment was in Bhopal as Under Secretary, General

Administration Department under Dr Kailas Nath Katju then Chief Minister
Madhya Pradesh. A veteran leader, with age he had become forgetful. In a
tea party in the Government House a person approached him and introduced
himself as Dashrat Lal Jain. Dr Katju said, “This is strange. I have a minister
by the same name”. The person replied, “That is me, Sir”!

26.7 HR Kamath, ICS, was then the Chief Secretary. I was sharing a room
close to Mr Kamath’s office with Bajpai another Under Secretary from the

86
state service who typed his notes. One day Mr Kamath walked into our
room and said “Mr Bajpai, you type your notes”. Bajpai proudly replied,
“Yes sir, it keeps the file neat”. “But must you type all day, Mr Bajpai” he
retorted and left. Next day, Bajpai shifted to another room. I had the room
to myself!

26.8 I got posted in 1960 as Collector Dewas. The city derived its name
from “Devi ka Nivas”, meaning “Home of the Goddess”. It had an ancient
Devi temple on a magnificent hill. Muslim Mazzars too had come up on that
hill. One day I saw a Hindu and a Muslim both paying homage to a deity in
a temple and to a Mazzar. I asked them why they were paying homage to
both. They responded, “Both are incarnations of the same god”. I felt
ashamed asking the question. This shows that the common Hindus and
Muslims of India respected each other’s faith and lived as one community.
Gandhi’s conviction was that once true democracy with empowered local
communities was instituted, Hindu Muslim conflicts would fade. God ordained
otherwise. Centralization and higher-level politics has divided the two
communities.

26.9 In 1962 I was posted Collector Vidisha near Sanchi, a national heritage.
Our son Vikram was born there. I received an offer for appointment as Deputy
Commissioner Andaman & Nicobar Islands. I accepted it. The islands had a
Chief Commissioner and a Deputy Commissioner. The British Chief
Commissioner had a luxurious Government House on Ross Island separated
from Port Blair the capital by a strait. After independence, the Chief
Commissioner moved to the Deputy Commissioner’s bungalow in Port Blair
and the Deputy Commissioner moved to a smaller bungalow nearby. As in
most state capitals, the British had made an Andaman Club primarily for officers.
We met there for tennis, billiards, bridge, rummy and farewell parties. Most
buildings in Andaman were made in paddock, a timber harder than teak found in
the island.

A small territory with two senior officers meant conflict. A saying was “there
are two currents, one CC current and the other DC current”. The Deputy
Commissioner was then also the District Judge. A large number of mostly
petty cases were pending in my court. I held day-to-day hearings, dictated
the orders in the presence of the parties and their advocates and cleared all
the cases within a few months. Thereafter it was easy handling. During my
tenure, a District Judge was appointed and I was relieved of judicial work. I
was also the Census Commissioner. My predecessor had not finalised the
census report. I completed it and incorporated in it the history of the cellular
jail and problems of the indigenous tribes. An island close to Port Blair
named Little Andaman, had an Onge tribe. One official used to cover the

87
face of an Onge with Plaster of Paris, and when it dried, took out the mask
and sold it. I issued strict orders stopping it as violation of human rights.
On another island there was a hostile tribe Jarawa that attacked visitors by
bows and arrows, apparently apprehending attack on them. There were
strict orders not to disturb them. I was also the receiver of ships. The only
post I did not hold was that of a lady doctor!

An old resident of the islands had a manuscript about the occupation during
the Second World War of the Islands by the Japanese. Subhash Chandra
Bose was a freedom fighter of India who had joined the Japanese against
the Allies. The Japanese lodged him in the Government House on Ross
Island as a sinecure head while the chief of the Japanese army lodged in
Port Blair administered the Islands. The soldiers of the defeated Indian
army were lodged in the cellular jail, a relic of British days in which many
freedom fights were incarcerated. During the Japanese occupation there
was acute food shortage. The people survived by eating tapioca.

My elder brother was an Air Force pilot stationed near Calcutta. He used to
fly to Nicobar Islands to deliver supplies to the Air Force base stationed
there. One day I got a wireless message that an Air Force plane had some
engine trouble and wanted permission for forced landing in Port Blair. I said
‘I hope it is not my brother and rushed to the airfield after intimating the
police and the fire brigade. The plane landed safely and my brother walked out
complaining that to reduce the load, his junior had thrown all the whiskey and
kept the rum! That evening we celebrated his safe landing by hosting a rum
party in my bungalow. His junior MM Shukla later got burns on his face and
hands in one of the combats in the Bangladesh war. He participated in the
Republic Day parade in 2008 as the oldest living war veteran!

26.10 On completing my term in the Andaman & Nicobar Islands, I returned

to Madhya Pradesh and was posted as Special Secretary Agriculture. Before
I learnt enough about agriculture, I was posted as Transport Commissioner
with head quarters in Gwalior. An IAS officer is expected to be a ‘Jack of all
trades’. The office of the Transport Commissioner was in an old palace with
beautiful murals on the roof that I got restored. I introduced standing orders
specifying penalty for various types of violations by bus and truck operators
and displayed them on the notice board. Interestingly these orders curbed
practises such as collecting bribes and paying reduced penalty. They
dramatically improved the revenues of the state and curbed corruption. Over
the years, such orders acquired legitimacy of government orders.

26.11 I went for higher studies in Syracuse University, USA in 1969 and did
my Masters in Public Administration. I impressed the senior faculty and

88
postgraduate student of economics by my mathematical analysis of some key
economic issues. On return I was appointed Secretary Housing and Environment
Department, Madhya Pradesh. For creating awareness about urban design
and conservation of the environment, I promoted an Environment & Planning
Coordination Organisation (EPCO). The Chief Minister got annoyed with me for
something I was not responsible and posted me as Chairman College Entrance
Board. It was operating from a clumsy rented building. I introduced computerised
evaluation of candidates and got a good building built for it on the capital hill.

26.12 I received an offer in 1972 for appointment as General Manager,

Delhi Transport Corporation. I accepted it. Dr Ashok Khosla who had just
then returned from studies abroad and was working with the Department of
Science and Technology, proposed some innovations in route management
of bus. As advised by him, we introduced a central node behind the North
Block of the Central Secretariat with nine nodes on the ring road and
introduced ten-minute frequency shuttle services between the central terminal
and the nine terminals on the Ring Road, and a service called “Mudrika” on
the Ring Road in both directions. This enabled commuters to get in a shuttle
at the Ring Road and catch another shuttle at the central node to the
destination he or she chose. This facilitated speedy commutation and also
improved the earning of DTC since the buses got good occupancy while
travelling to or from the central terminal. The New Scientist, a journal published
from London, carried an article “When Delhi made the buses run on time”.

Often the conductors could not reach passengers in crowded buses and
were frequently suspended by inspectors for not issuing tickets. I introduced
a simple innovation, a seat for the conductor near the entrance and an exit
door in the front controlled by the driver. The passenger’s could, as a result,
not evade buying tickets. The conductors felt deeply obliged. I documented
all such innovations in a book “Productivity in Road Transport: A study in
innovative management”. A transport manager from Guana wrote to me,
“The Book is like a Bible to me”.

26.13 I returned to Madhya Pradesh where I was promoted as

Commissioner Ujjain Division. The ancient famous Mahakal Temple of Ujjain
was in a bad shape. I brought it under a statutory trust with Commissioner
Ujjain as the chairperson. The trust resolved that the priests would get a
stipulated share of the offerings. At first the priests were upset. When
devotees learnt that the trust would retain a part of the offerings for improving
the precincts of the temple and for charity, the offerings dramatically increased,
and so did the share of the priests! Interestingly, the same principle applies
for nurturing good democratic governance. With the funds generated, the
Temple and its prescient were greatly improved and charity for children of

89
the poor initiated. The sanctum sanctorum’ called Garbha kaksh in Hindi,
had only one stair for entry and exit that led to traffic jams. On my request
leading industrialist GD Birla extended support for make a separate stair for
exit from the sanctum sanctorum. Extensive improvements were also made
in the other temples and Ghats (river fronts) of Ujjain using the funds made
available by the State Government for the preparations to be made in
connection with the 1980 Simhasta called Kumbh in six other major religious
cities of India.

When I was transferred, the priests of Mahakal Temple organised a special

bhasma arti that is prayer session for me as gratitude for improving the
temple —- and their earnings. Dr Shivmangal Singh Suman a former Vice
Chancellor of the Ujjain University was a classmate of Harivansh Rai Bachchan,
a scholar, poet and father of eminent actor Amitabh Bachchan. I still remember
Dr. Suman’s poems, “Ujjaine ke malino ko mera pranam” —- a homage to the
flower women of Ujjain and one other poem, “Jab Bachchan aur Suman soye
thaa sath sath”. Don’t get wrong ideas. They only shared a hostel room!

Dr Suman had raised some funds for building a Kalidas Academy, as homage
to the famous poet Kalidas born in Ujjain in Ancient India. Kalidas, in his
famous poem “Meghdoot”, makes a reference to Ujjain in the words “Jab tum
Ujjaine ka Mahakal Mandir par jao, pujarino ka naach dekh apna man bahalao,
parantu un ke rang dhang dekh atak na jana …”. I managed to procure supportive
funds from the State Department of Culture and got getting the Kalidas Academy
built. In it young artists are groomed to enact plays of Kalidas and other eminent
Indian play writes. On my transfer, Dr Shiv Mangal Singh said in his farewell
speech, “Sharmaji pagal hain, Ujjain ke vikas ka hee sochte rahate hain”. In
my response I said “Mai Sumanji ka abhari huun ke unho ne mujhe apni pagalon
ke tolee mey sammilit kar lea hai”. The quip invited resounding laughter.

26.14 I was posted as Resident Commissioner Madhya Pradesh in Delhi in

1981. I engaged leading architect Sumit Ghosh to improve the reception area
and VIP suite in Madhya Pradesh Bhawan. I invited veteran reputed Architect
AP Kanvinde who creatively designed the second Madhya Pradesh Bhawan
that later was allocated to Chhatisgarh state when it was carved out of
Madhya Pradesh.

26.15 My last assignment in government was as Chairman & Managing

Director HUDCO during 1984-91. The Delhi Urban Arts Commission insisted
on urban design for want of which many projects were held up for decades.
I constituted an architecture coordination committee of senior architects
such as late JA Stein, late AP Kanvinde, JR Bhalla, Anil Laul, Sumit Ghosh,
Ravindra Bhan, Jasbir Sahani and others, and through them had numerous

90
creative urban designs developed. A flawed practise followed in CPWD is
that treating architects as contractors, it invites tenders from them. Based
on the advice of the architecture coordination committee, I issued order that
being professional services such as doctors and lawyers, fees shall be paid
as laid by the Council of Architecture, a statutory body. A number of
institutional areas were held up for urban design. I evolved a simple solution
namely HUDCO with the assistance of its architecture advisory committee
would commission eminent architects for preparing the urban design, and
recover the proportional cost with interest from the institutions allocated
space when they chose to build, and they would pay to their architect less
the amount paid to HUDCO for the urban design. HUDCO commissioned
senior architects Romi Khosla for Bhaiveer Singh Marg institutional area,
Jasbir Sahwaney for Ansal Plaza, and Ravindra Bhan for the housing abutting
it. The housing has been creatively landscaped. Architect Anil Laul
commissioned for a housing complex in Vaishali Gaziabad did a highly
creative design that would have opened new perceptions. After I left HUDCO
it got aborted.

26.16 The Land and Development Office (L&DO) of the Ministry of Urban
Development had divided land measuring nearly 10 acre on Lodi Road into
plots and allotted one plot to HUDCO for its training institute named “Human
Settlement Management Institute”. Delhi Urban Arts Commission insisted
for an urban design for want of which the project was held up for several
decades. In my capacity as CMD, HUDCO, I offered to get the urban design
prepared and commissioned the firm of eminent Architects JA Stein & JR
Bhalla to prepare it. This led to the evolution of the concept of India Habitat
Centre as an integrated urban design in which a large number of institutions
have been accommodated and in addition a unique cultural centre gifted to
the city. An underground parking for cars below the nearly 10 acre land was
provided for in the urban design. When the foundation was being dug JR
Bhalla told me that they had to dig deep to get a firm foundation and that if
so desired a second level underground parking could be provided. I
immediately conveyed my approval. This has ensured that that there is no
dearth of parking in the IHC complex.

When the project was nearing completion Vinay Jha an IAS officer on
deputation to HUDCO was appointed Director of India Habitat Centre. He
without the approval of HUDCO leased all catering rights to a catering firm
Old World Hospitality. This was violation of land zoned institutional in which
commercial activities are not permitted. HUDCO cancelled the lease. The
caterers filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court which held that since the
lease had been granted by the Director it was binding on the society. The
Caterers now control all careering rights in India Habitat Centre and have

91
even converted a space zoned as a Coffee Lounge for Members only as a
commercial restaurant American Diner open to all. When the lease of the
caterers expires in the next few years, HUDCO should not extend the their
lease and issue directions that catering shall thereafter be handled in house
as in India International Centre, the main promoter of India Habitat Centre. I
also suggest that hereafter a serving officer of HUDCO should be appointed
as Director of India Habitat Centre so that he is accountable to HUDCO and
through HUDCO to the India Habitat Centre society and the Ministry of Urban
Development.

26.17 Democracy & Governance: When I completed my tenure in

government in 1991, Dr Ashok Khosla, Chairman Development Alternatives
who had advised me on restructuring the bus services in DTC, invited me to
join Development Alternatives as Senior Advisor. Dr Hari Sharan, an energy
consultant of Indian origin living in Switzerland used to visit Development
Alternatives. During informal discussions, he told me that in Switzerland
the villages coordinated by canton also called county or district, control
local resources to handle all local matters. This resonates with Gandhi’s
village republics. Hari Sharan said that Berne, the capital of Switzerland did
not have an airport that was proposed several times but was rejected by its
citizens through referendum on the ground that it led to noise pollution.
This convinced me that Gandhi advocated such true democracy with
empowered local communities.

26.18 What bothered me is how it can now be reinstated. While returning

from the Rio Conference on sustainable development held in 1992, a master
solution dawned on me, namely that apart for a parliament and an independent
judiciary all nation states need an independent Sovereign Rights Commission
with authority to direct referendums except on issues fundamental to
democracy or the integrity of the nation. There can for example be no
referendum on making the state theocratic or a region seceding. Superior to
the Royal Priest of bygone days, more like Gandhi, such a commission will
function as the conscience kept of the state based on the values of the
society as a whole. It is thus not a new but an age old institution with
historically legitimacy.

27.19 When Shri Digvijay Singh became Chief Minister, Madhya Pradesh,
he invited me after my retirement as Member of the State Planning Board. I
had never worked under him but apparently my work especially in Ujjain had
come to his notice. Taking cue from my observations, Digvijay Singh wrote
to the then Union Finance Minister that suiting India’s tropical ecology,
October to September may be made our financial year. He got a bureaucratic
reply that this had been considered by a committee of secretaries and was

92
not considered necessary. The reason for such a reply apparently is that if
it were accepted, citizens may seek other more politically inconvenient
governance reforms. Digvijay Singh introduced directly elected Mayors as
chief executives, replacing the IAS municipal commissioner who called ICS
has been the chief executive since the colonial rule. He instituted statutory
neighbourhood committees in cities, and gave effective powers to the village
panchayats. His greatest initiative was instituting District Governments that
coordinate village and city needs and take all intra district decisions facilitating
sound decision-making and reducing workload and delays in the state
secretariat. He was Chief Minister for two terns but lost the election that
followed since the BJP government at the national level had not released
central grants badly needed for repairs to state roads. This highlights that in
democracy local and state governments should control local and state
resources so that they are not dependent on doles from the national
government.

93
 Chronology of important Events
Source: David Luddwn “India and South Asia – A Short History” &
One World Oxford Publications & other records -

Nationalism becomes a mass movement

1915 Home Rule League active. Gandhi returns from South Africa and tours cities
gathering support.

1919 Massacre in Jallianwallah Bagh followed by All India Satyagraha.

1925 Rashtriya Sevak Sandh (RSS) & Shiromani Akali Dal founded

1927 MK Gandhi’s book “My Experiments with Truth” published

1930 Round Table Conference 1930 & 1932. Gandhi launches Salt Satyagraha.

1935 Government of India Act of 1935 enacted.

1937 Congress provincial ministries elected in seven of the eleven Indian provinces.

1939 World War Two from 1939 to 45. Congress ministries resign.

1940 Muslim League adopts “Lahore Declaration for Pakistan”.

1942 Congress launches Quit India Movement

1946 British Cabinet Mission visits India. Maulan Abul Kalam Azad proposes a federal
structure. Jinnah and the Mission both approve the plan. An indiscrete statement made by
Nehru during a press conference held in Bombay aborts the proposal. Partition becomes
inevitable.

1947 On 14 August Jinnah takes oath as President of newly created state of Pakistan. On
15 August Lord Mountbatten takes oath of office as the first Governor General of India.
Migration of Hordes of refugee families from India to Pakistan, and from Pakistan to India
commences. Mountbatten constitutes a cabinet committee to deal with it. Relief camps
constituted. Police and military deployed to curb rioting and looting.

1948 On the evening of 30 January 1948, Gandhi is assassinated by a Hindu youth, Nathu
Ram Godse, for partitioning India, a crime that he did not commit, and was in fact was
totally opposed to.

1950 India adopts its Constitution on January 16, 1950. Jawaharlal Nehru assumes office
as its first Prime Minister.

1953 Bengali language movement in East Pakistan; many students massacred.

1956 India adopts “States Reorganisation Act”, a good initiative that facilitates use of
English (1) as national and international link language, (2) Hindi in Hindi speaking states,
and (3) regional languages in other states.

1958 Ayub Khan becomes martial law administrator of Pakistan.

94
1962 Third Indian General Election. Indo-Chinese war on Tibetan frontier.

1963 Indian State of Nagaland created.

1964 Death of Jawaharlal Nehru

1965 India Pakistan War for Kashmir

1984 Indira Gandhi directs bombardment of the Golden Temple of the Sikh community in
Amritsar to flush out a Sikh youth Brindanwalle. Angered, the Sikhs community took to
violence in India and abroad. A Sikh soldier on security duty at the residence of Indira Gandhi
assassinated her. This culminated in riots all over the country. It took quite some time to heal
the wounds.

After the assassination o Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi got elected as Prime Minister. His
significant contributions have been (1) emphasis on modernisation of the economy, (2)
economic liberalisation, and (3) empowering village communities. He improved bilateral
relations with the United States and established close relationship with the Soviet Union,
enlarged scientific cooperation with it and expanded economic cooperation. He increased
government support for science and technology and associated industry in such initiatives.
He removed quotas and reduced import taxes and tariffs on technology based industries
especially computers. He came down heavily on the licence regime and introduced
measures significantly curtailing it.

1986 Rajiv Gandhi announces a national education policy to modernise and expand higher
education programmes across India and founded Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya programme
in the same year. He gave serious thought to the functioning of the public sector. He
suggested offering its shares to the public especially the villagers. He initiated Panchayati
Raj constitutional amendments. Rajiv Gandhi was wrongly advised to send Indian forces
to Sri Lanka to curb terrorist activities of Tamil Tigers.

1991 Rajiv Gandhi assassinated on May 21, 1991 by Tamils when addressing a meeting
in Tamilnadu. Narsimha Rao gets elected as Prime Minister. Facing bankruptcy, the Nersimha
Rao government opens the economy to the global market.

1992 The Parliament promulgates the 73rd & 74th constitutional amendments initiated by Rajiv
Gandhi for local empowerment. 2001. Kripilani Krishna, “All Men are brothers –
Autobiographical reflections of Mahatama Gandhi”. Compiled and edited by with introduction
by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan; First published by Continunimum, First South Asia Edition
2007; Library of Congress number 79-56684; ISBN: 1-8468-4069-4

After 1991 an open economy in a centralised polity is creating an illusion of economic

development through market forces that are promoting luxuries of the rich nations such as
high rise apartment buildings, shopping malls and import of wide range of luxury cars
while the poor living in the villages and urban slums suffer mounting abuse. This in turn is
fostering mounting crime. Unless we institute true democracy with empowered local
communities, India is likely to drift into anarchy and further balkanisation. It may then be too
late to institute any reforms.

95
 Bibliography

(1) Ahuja, Ajay, Manmohan Singh, CEO, India INC., Xact Group; Delhi.
2004

(2) “All Men are brothers – Autobiographical reflections of Mahatma Gandhi”

Compiled and edited by Krishna Kripilani with introduction by Sarvepalli
Radhakrishnan;
First published by Continunimum, First South Asia Edition 2007
Library of Congress number 79-56684; ISBN: 1-8468-4069-4

(3) Azad, Maulana. India wins Freedom, Orient Longman Limited, Calcutta,
1959.

(4) Bidwai, Praful, India’s Bubble Economy Booms as Poverty Grows,

Copyright: Asia Times Co. Ltd. 2000.

(5) Dr. Brydon’s Report on the British Retreat from Kabul in January 1842;
“Afghanistan, Historical and Cultural Quarterly, 20 (Kabul, 1967), 55-
65.

(6) Devasahayam, MG, India’s Second Freedom Struggle: An unknown

Saga, Siddharth, New Delhi, 2004.
(7) Gandhi: All men are brothers – Autobiographical reflections by Mahatama
Gandhi, Compiled & Edited by Krishna Kripalani; Introduction by Sarvepalli
Radhakrishnan. First South Asia edition 2000,
(8) Gandhimohan, MV, Mahatama Gandhi and the Baha’is: Striving towards a
non-violent Civilisation, 2000.

(9) Kashyap, Subhash, History of Parliament of India Volume 1, Centre for

Policy Research, Dharma Marg, New Delhi.

(10) Kripilani, Krishna; “All Men are brothers – Autobiographical reflections

of Mahatama Gandhi”. Compiled and edited with introduction by
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan; First published by Continunimum, First South
Asia Edition 2007.

(11) Kamdar, Mira, Planet India. Scribner, 1230 Avenues of America, New
York. 2007.

(12) Kriplani, JB, My Times: An Autobiography, Rupa publishers, New Delhi,

2004.

96
(13) Katherine, Frank, Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi, Harper Collins,
London, 2001.

(14) Lightbody, Bradley, The Second World War, Routledge London, 2004.

(15) Lloyd, Rudolph & Susanne, Postmodern Gandhi, Oxford University Press,
2006.

(16) Ludden, David, India and South Asia: A short History, Oxford OX2 7AR,
2002

(17) Nanda, BR, Nehru, Jawaharlal: An Autobiography, Three Statesmen,

Gokhale, Gandhi and Nehru, 2004.

(18) Narayan, Shriman, “Gandhian Constitution for Free India” 1945, Kitabistan,
Allahabad,
republished by People First on its website: www.peoplefirstindia.org.

(19) Omvedt, Gail, Ambedkar: Towards an Enlightened India, Publishers:

Penguin Books India, 2004.

(20)Robins, Nick, The Corporation that changed the world: Orient Longman,
Hyderabad, India, 2006.

(21) Sahgal, Naintara, Indira Gandhi: Her Road to Power; Macdonald & Co,
London & Sydney,1983.

(22) Singh, Mohan, Enemies of Peace, Atma Ram & Sons, Kashmiri Gate,
Delhi,1947.

(23)Tharoor, Shashi, Nehru: The Invention of India. Penguin Books India,

2003.

(24) Verghese, BG, India’s Northeast Resurgent, Konark Publishers New

Delhi, 2004.

(25) Wright John, The Indian Summer, Penguin Books, New Delhi, 2006.

(26) Website: historytogo; Utah State, http://historytogo.utah.gov/

hmearlymor.htmi , Flags at Half Mast
(27) Website: www.peoplefirstindia.org. People First, a trust dedicated to
instituting good governance.
(28) Website: www.devalt.org. Sustainable development, environmental
systems, and global warming

97
 Citations from the Constitution for Free Bharat (India) 2000,
proposed by People First in website www.peoplefirstindia.org

1. Sir Charles Metcalfe, Governor General of the East India Company

praises ‘self sustaining tiny republic of India”

2. Failure of movement for Chaukhamba Raj (four pillar rule), that is village,
district, state and national governments launched by Dr Ram Manohar
Lohia and Jai Prakash Narayan. It is similar to Gandhi’s Gram Swaraj
that is village republics.

3. Rajiv Gandhi makes public statements that out of a rupee only sixteen
paise reach the villages and to facilitate good governance initiates the
panchayati raj reforms.

4. In Keshwanand Bharati v/s Union of India, the Supreme Court of India

declarers that fundamental rights constitute the basic structure of the
Constitution and restricts power of the parliament to make changes in
them.

5. PA Sangma, then Speaker Lok Sabha circulates a document of Lal

Bahadur Shastri Memorial Foundation and People First with message
of support by Justice MN Venkatachalaiya, a revered former Chief Justice
of India, in the Golden Jubilee special session of Parliament in 1997.

6. Congress leader Digvijay Singh, former Chief Minister Madhya Pradesh,

expresses conviction that India needs Gandhian democracy. Interview
on TVI by Malvika Singh, November 30, 1997.

7. KS Sudershan, Chief of RSS, commends democratic tradition of self

governing villages since Vedic period as laid down in Dharmashastras.
Interview on TV by Malvika Singh, November 1997.

8. Video film “Swiss and ancient India” produced by Nalani Singh for
Doordarshan highlights that contemporary Swiss village governments
have great similarity with those in ancient India.

9. Thomas Jefferson asserts that “no other than the people themselves
should be the ultimate repository of all authority of society”. (“American
Sphinx” by JE Ellis).

10. In his address in the First Round Table Conference held in 1930, Lord
Peel of Conservative Party of Britain, favours Swiss or American
parliamentary model for India. Struggle for Freedom” by RC Majumdar.

98
11. Brian Beedham prophesises “democracy will enter a new phase bordering
on direct democracy through increasing use of referendums”. (Article
“Full Democracy” in “The Economist, Dec. 21, 1996”)

12. Dr BR Ambedkar observes “If equity is denied for long, it will put our
political democracy in peril” and during debates in the Constituent
Assembly on November 25, 1949 recall Jefferson’s statement that “no
generation can bind subsequent generations”.

13. Alvin Toffler in the Chapter titled “Gandhi and Satellite” in his famous
book “The Third Wave” advocates “synthesis of Gandhi and frontier
technologies”.

14. Charles de Gaulle gets re-elected after bringing constitutional reforms

through referendum in France providing for directly elected President
above the Prime Minister elected by the parliament; Talk by Prof. Ashwani
Ray, JNU, in India Forum.

15. Jawaharlal Nehru first fails to understand Gandhi’s references to India’s

democratic traditions and then concedes inappropriateness of a
superimposed democracy without a proper base. Source: letters to Gandhi
Volume III and Jawaharlal Nehru on building a New India” NIUA Journal November
1991.

99
About the Author
The Author Santosh K. Sharma is
a former civil servant, IAS-MP-56.
He is presently Managing
Trustee, People First, a trust
dedicated to instituting good
governance, promoted by
Development Alternatives, a
prominent civil society
organisation addressing issues of
sustainable development. While
in government the Author had a
hunch that there was something
seriously flawed in the manner in
which governance was structured
but could not comprehend what
was wrong. Nonetheless, he
tried to serve the people as best
as he could and wherever he was
posted local communities liked
him. When he retired in 1991, Dr
Ashok Khosla, Chairman
Development Alternatives, with
whom he had interacted as
administrative head of Delhi Road
Transport Corporation and later
again as CMD, HUDCO, invited
him to join Development
Alternatives as Senior Advisor.
We both felt that there was
something fundamentally flawed
with the way governance was
structured in India and promoted
People First, a trust dedicated to
instituting good governance.
Based on intense research and
lateral thinking, the Author has not
only identified what is wrong with
governance in India, but has also
conceptualised a legitimate, non
violent process by which true
egalitarian democracy as
advocated by Gandhi and
practised in ancient India
symbolised in Ram Raj, rule of the
epic monarch Ram, can be
instituted and eventually in all
nations in the world.