Rubrics For Human Advocacy Campaign
Rubrics For Human Advocacy Campaign
Rubrics For Human Advocacy Campaign
We Teach. We Touch.
We Train. We Transform
PRE-FINAL EXAMINATION
GE 7: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY
1ST Semester, A.Y. 2019-2020
RUBRICS
HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY CAMPAIGN
1.
2.
3.
Members 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Section
Partially Proficient P
Criteria Exemplary (20 pts) Proficient (15 pts) (10 pts) Incomplete (5 pts)
Has a clear picture of Has a fairly clear picture of Has brainstormed their Little effort has been spent on
what they are trying to what they are trying to concept, but no clear brainstorming and refining a
achieve. Adequate achieve. Can describe what focus has emerged. concept. Unclear on the goals
description of what they they are trying to do overall Goals/final product not and how the project objectives
Concept
are trying to do and but has trouble describing clearly defined. will be met.
generally how his/her how his/her work will
work will contribute to contribute to the final
the final project. project.
The content includes a Information is presented as The content does not Content lacks a central theme,
clear statement of a connected theme with present a clearly clear point of view and logical
purpose or theme and accurate, current supporting stated theme, is sequence of information. Much
is creative, compelling information that contributes vague, and some of of the supporting information is
and clearly written. A to understanding the the supporting irrelevant to the overall
rich variety of project’s main idea. Details information does not message. The viewer is
supporting information are logical and persuasive seem to fit the main unsure what the message is
Content/ in the video contributes information is effectively idea or appears as a because there is little
Organizatio to the understanding of used. The content includes a disconnected series of persuasive information and
n the project’s main idea. clear point of view with a scenes with no only one or two facts about the
Events and messages progression of ideas and unifying main idea. topic are articulated.
are presented in a supporting information. Includes few citations Information is incorrect, out of
logical order. Includes Includes properly cited and few facts. date, or incomplete. No
properly cited sources. sources. citations included.
CENTRAL LUZON COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
General Education Department
We Teach. We Touch.
We Train. We Transform
Quality Movie was completed Movie was completed and Movie was made, but There was no movie, or tape
and had all required contained all required items. had very little if any was totally unedited with no
elements. The video Editing was not done as well editing. Many poor transitions or audio support of
was well edited and as it should have been. shots remain. Video any kind.
moves smoothly from Some poor shots remain. was very fragmented
scene to scene with Movie is still somewhat and choppy with little
proper use of choppy. Audio and other to no audio
transitions. Audio and enhancements were utilized, reinforcement.
other enhancements but not for maximum effect.
were well used.
Final Score
JEFFERSON S. VALDEZ, MAN, MAEd ALENNIE M. SIBUG JOHN JAMES A. LARAFOSTER, Ed.D.
Signature Over-Printed Name Dean/Department Head Director for Academics and Research
CENTRAL LUZON COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
General Education Department
We Teach. We Touch.
We Train. We Transform