Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

H6P1 L13 - 15 Assumptions Homocedasticity and Independence

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

1.

In the Fire Safety Journal article ("The nozzle design effect on the stability and performance of suppliers of turbulent water", Vol.
4) an experiment is described in which it is wanted to study the effect of the form for various nozzle designs. The focus was on the
stability of the outflow. Data are presented below. Use α = 0.01.

Nozzle design Stability of the outflow


1 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.75 0.77 0.78
2 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.83
3 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.83
4 1.14 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.83
5 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75

Varianza
Degree of ponderada

Yi. ni Ybi. Si2 Si freedom (ni-1)*Si2


4.69 6 0.782 0.0005 0.021 5 0.00
5.12 6 0.853 0.0014 0.037 5 0.01
5.41 6 0.902 0.0018 0.042 5 0.01
5.66 6 0.943 0.0129 0.114 5 0.06
4.88 6 0.813 0.0075 0.087 5 0.04
SSE= 0.12
a. Graphically check the assumption of independence of errors, use the two graphs.

Comportamiento de la variabilidad natural del


proceso a través del tiempo
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
Residuos

0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
t: Tiempo
Comportamiento de residuos vs valor esperado
de la tabla ANOVA
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
Resiudos

0.05
0
0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
Nozzle

b. It is pretended to compare the average stability outflow for 6 nozzles, determine the size samples for each nozzle, consider
that the current control nozzle has a σ = 0.069 and it is desired determine a practical difference D = 0.15 hours. So that the
power of the test is at least 0.90. Use α = 0.01
**************************************************************************************************

You might also like