Journal Pre-Proof: Ceramics International
Journal Pre-Proof: Ceramics International
Journal Pre-Proof: Ceramics International
Panmella Pereira Maciel, Joyce Andreza Moreira Pessôa, Eudes Leonnan Gomes de
Medeiros, Andre Ulisses Dantas Batista, Lucas Ricardo Fernandes Figueiredo, Eliton
Souto de Medeiros, Dennis França de Oliveira Duarte, Adriano Francisco Alves,
Frederico Barbosa de Sousa, Basilio Rodrigues Vieira, Roberta Ferreti Bonan Dantas
Batista, Danyel Elias Cruz Perez, Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes, Lúcio Roberto
Cançado Castellano, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan
PII: S0272-8842(20)31940-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.280
Reference: CERI 25707
Please cite this article as: P.P. Maciel, J.A. Moreira Pessôa, E.L. Gomes de Medeiros, A.U. Dantas
Batista, L.R. Fernandes Figueiredo, E. Souto de Medeiros, D. França de Oliveira Duarte, A.F. Alves,
F. Barbosa de Sousa, B.R. Vieira, R.F. Bonan Dantas Batista, D.E. Cruz Perez, R.R. Menezes,
Lú.Roberto. Cançado Castellano, Paulo.Rogé. Ferreti Bonan, Use of strontium doping glass-ceramic
material for bone regeneration in critical defect: In vitro and in vivo analyses, Ceramics International
(2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.280.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
Laboratory for Cell Culture and Analysis (LACEC), Dentistry Graduation Program,
Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Paraiba, Brazil.
2
Laboraroty of Materials Technology (LTM), Department of Materials Engineering,
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
3
LAMAB-Laboratory of Materials and Biosystems, Material Engineering Graduation
Program, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Paraiba, Brazil.
4
Laboratory of Microscopy and Hard Tissues, Dentistry Graduation Program,
Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Paraiba, Brazil.
5
Laboratory of Oral Pathology, Dentistry Graduation Program, Universidade Federal
de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.
In tubes containing BHI broth medium and the materials (100 mg/mL), pH
values were measured at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72h to determine the pH changes
by a pHmeter (pH21, HANNA). pH values variation curve was subsequently
correlated with the determined microbial growth [7,36].
2.4.3. Macrodilution
Powders (100mg, 50mg, 25mg, 12.5mg and 6.25mg) were inserted into
48-well plates. Afterwards, 800μL of culture medium (BHI or SDB broth) was
added to each well. Next, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 48h to condition
the powders [7]. 200μL of the strain suspensions, previously standardized
(optical density equal to 0.5 McFarland) [33,34], were added to each well at the
final concentration of 105CFU/mL for bacteria and 103CFU/mL for yeast. Plates
were incubated in a bacteriological oven at 35-37 °C for 24-48 h. After this
period, MIC was determined visually and 10μL of the subcultures were plated
on agar medium and incubated under the above conditions. After the incubation
period, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) or minimum fungicidal
concentration (MFC) was defined as the lowest materials concentration, and
99.9% of colonies were eliminated [35].
Histological sections of the Clot, CPSr0 and CPSr25 groups were stained
by TM and H&E (Figure 14). TM staining showed a tendency for formation of a
single bone block at the edges of defect and presence of dense connective
tissue connecting calcification centers, with bone neoformation directed to the
center. Neoformed bone tissue during both periods showed many osteocytes
and irregular bone gaps, characterizing an immature pattern. There were no
outbreaks of bone necrosis in the specimens, confirming absence of local
toxicity of samples, doped or not with Sr2+. The biomaterials were completely
reabsorbed at 14 days.
Greater bone neoformation was observed in the groups, mainly for the
CPSr25 at 14 and 28 days (Figure 15). Significant differences between groups
implanted with CP were seen in the 28-day period (p=0.025). These results
confirmed the data obtained in the micro-CT, in which, a higher BV and PBV for
the CP groups, especially on doped products were found. Differently from the
studies which improvements in bone quality after doping were not obtained
[54,63], biocompatibility and bone repair potential is verified in the present
study, and substitutions of 25 mol% Sr2+ are safe for therapeutic applications
[9,21,24].
The good results obtained in the CPSr25 group, verified in the
microtomographic and histometric analyses, can be explained by the higher rate
of initial dissolution in medium and constant formation of a thinner layer of HA
that allows a prolonged bioactivity, as previously seen in the literature [10]. This
finding can be explained due to the ability of Sr2+ doped CP to stimulate the
expression of the genes Alpl, Col1a1, Bglap and Runx2 in the periods of 7 to 14
days [9, 22]. Alpl, Col1a1, Bglap and Runx2 are markers of early osteoblastic
differentiation, presence of pre-osteoblasts and initial deposition of osteoid, late
stage of osteogenic differentiation, and regulation of osteogenesis, respectively
[64]. This cascade of markers directly influences osteogenic proliferation and
differentiation, conditioning better bone repair abilities in vivo [9].
An increase in vascularization at 14 to 28 days and absence of
inflammation during two periods for the Clot group was observed (Figure 16).
CPSr0 showed a discrete periosteal inflammatory exudate predominantly
macrophagic immersed in neoformed connective tissue with abundant presence
of young vessels in 14 days and, in 28 days, abundant mononuclear
inflammation with rare lymphocytes and few blood vessels. In the CPSr25
group, there was abundant mononuclear exudate infiltrated in a connective
tissue rich in blood capillaries on periosteum at 14 and 28 days. We found
higher values for the CPSr25 in relation to the Clot group for the degree of
inflammation in both periods (p=0.0005; p=0.0036) and for the degree of
vascularization at 14 days=0.0036). Degree of vascularization was significantly
higher for the CPSr25 group than the CPSr0 only in 28 days (p=0.0036). The
greater and constant degree of vascularization and inflammation verified in the
CPSr25 group were related to significant bone gains. When in contact with
biomaterials, it is essential for biodegradation process of grafts in the signaling
of growth factors and in bone regeneration [65].
5. CONCLUSIONS
In the present study, we evaluated the effect of the addition of Sr2+ ions in
the CP with the composition of S53P4 on the physicochemical characteristics,
in the in vitro bioactivity tests and on bone regeneration of critical-size defects in
rat calvaria. Samples were successfully doped with Sr2+ and presented a
bioactive crystalline phase, with an irregular porous surface and presented high
antibacterial and antifungal action. Although delayed inhibition of S. mutans and
E. faecalis was observed, this did not interfere with the final antimicrobial effect.
Materials doped with Sr2+ presented bioactivity under in vitro tests with the
development of HA and beta-tricalcium phosphate on powder surface after 168
hours. The substitution of CaO by SrO (CPSr25) presented the best results in
the repair of critical-size bone defects in the in vivo studies, from as evidenced
by the microtomographic and histological results. Therefore, Sr2+ doping CP are
good candidates for a variety of dental applications, with bone and infectious
involvement.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Brazilian research funding agency CNPq, grant
nos. 308822/2018-8 and 420004/2018-1, for the financial support.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Förster, R. Bernhardt, V. Hintze, S. Möller, M. Schnabelrauch, D.
bone formation in a critical size bone defect — A pilot study in rats. Mater Sci C
237X.107427
[4] W. Wang, K.W.K. Yeung. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007
vertebral osteomyelitis: Three patients and three pathogens. Scand J Surg., 105
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv327
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22463.
10.1039/c3tb21047b
properties of bioactive glass S53P4. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 25 (2014) 657–
668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5120-1
[11] J.C. Aurégana, I.T. Béguéa. Bioactive glass for long bone infection: a
1383(15)30048-6
DOI: 10.3233/BME-161596
bone defects with bioactive glass S53P4 in the upper and lower jaws. J
[15] R.L. Siqueira, L.C. Costa, M.A. Schiavon, D.T. Castro, C. Andréa, A.C.
synthesized via an acetic acid-assisted sol-gel route. J Sol-Gel Sci Tech. 83(1)
bioactive powders: Synthesis and in vitro bioactivity. Mater Sci Eng C. 31 (2011)
983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.02.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.086
226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.07.009
3167-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5653-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5528-x
10.1097/MD.0000000000007525
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00362A.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.009
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017
[30] R.L. Siqueira, E.D. Zanotto. Facile route to obtain a highly bioactive
1791–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.08.013
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0647
[32] L. Drago, D. Romanò, E. Vecchi, C. Vassena, N. Logoluso, R. Mattina,
13-584
[33] CLSI, Clinical and laboratory standards institute. M07-A10: methods for
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2011.03.016
[36] I. Gergely, A. Zazgyva, A. Man, S.G. Zuh, T.S. Pop. The in vitro
145–60. https://doi.org/10.1556/AMicr.61.2014.2.5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.097
application in bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019,
evaluation in osseous defects in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 60
[41] A.M. Parfitt, M.K. Drezner, F.H. Glorieux, J.A. Kanis, H. Malluche, P.J.
595-610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650020617
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.069
[43] K.S. Batista, A.F. Alves, M.D.S. Lima, L.A. Silva, P.P. Lins, J.A.S.
30-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517003282
[44] S.C. Chao, M.J. Wang, N.S. Pai, S.K. Yen. Preparation and
tissue repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 57 (2015) 113-122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.047
[45] P.N. Mendes, S.C. Rahal, O.C. Pereira-Junior, V.E. Fabris, S.L.
[46] E.G. Pires, R.F. Bonan, I.M. Rocha, I.M.F. Gonçalves, J.R. Souza,
L.H.V Gonzales, J.V.J. Silva Júnior, D.E.C. Perez, P.C.B. Tavares, S.M.
of the Bioactive Glasses, 45S5 and S53P4. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 (2012)
607–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.05012.x
[48] M.D. O’Donnel. Predicting bioactive glass properties from the molecular
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.011
https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM14674F
2916.2008.02847.x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00822-5
Lee, M.H.N. Esfahani, C.A. Mitchell, J.R. Jones. Highly degradable porous
[57] H.C. Li, C.Z. Chen, J.H. Hu, D.G. Wang. Effect of various additives on
[58] Y.C. Fredholm, N. Karpukhina, D.S. Brauer, J.R. Jones, R.V. Law, R.G.
880–889. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0387
54–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12495
308.
bone defects: current and future strategies. Neurosurg Focus. 29 (2010) E8.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.FOCUS10201
237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32355
[64] O. Jeon, J.W. Rhie, I.K. Kwon, J.H. Kim, B.S. Kim, S.H. Lee. In vivo
cells that are not differentiated osteogenically. Tissue Eng Part A. 14 (2008)
285-1294. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0253
j.actbio.2017.08.015
CPSr0a 53 23 20 4 0
CPSr25 53 23 15 4 5.0
a
S53P4 bioactive glass composition
Table 2. Grades atributted to the histological evaluation. Adapted from Mendes
et al. (2009).45
Samples 24 h 72 h 168 h
GC + + + + + + + +
SC - - - - - - - -
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal
concentration (MBC) of the samples (mg/mL) against C. albicans, C. glabrata,
C. krusei and C. tropicalis and controls sterility of samples (SC) and growth of
microorganisms (GC). The signs (-) means negative and (+) positive growth.
GC + + + + + + + +
SC - - - - - - - -
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) curves of the studied samples.
Figure 2. DTA thermograms of the studied samples.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the samples thermal treated at 800 °C (Na2CaSi2O6
(●), Na2Ca2Si3O9(○), SrSiO3 (□), Na2SrSi2O6 (■)).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the samples treated at 800 °C.
Figure 5. Micrographs (SEM) of the powder samples.
Figure 6. Release of Sr2+ ion from the CPSr12.5 and CPSr25 in distilled water
over a period of 60 (1h), 360 (6h) and 720 (12h) minutes. The release of Sr2+
ions was reported in mg/ L.
Figure 7. Micrographs (SEM) of the powders samples after immersion in
simulated body fluid (SBF) for 24 (above), 72 (middle) and 168h (below).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the samples after immersion in simulated body fluid
(SBF) for 24, 72 and 168h (Na2CaSi2O6 (●), Na2Ca2Si3O9(○), SrSiO3 (□),
Hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) (X), Calcium Carbonate (C), Beta Tricalcium
Phosphate (T).
Figure 9. FTIR spectra of the samples after immersion in simulated body fluid
(SBF).
Figure 10. Death curve of microorganisms exposed to the evaluated samples
(CFU/mL in relation to time (h)).
Figure 11. pH values of the samples (100 mg/mL) in culture medium (BHI broth
– Control).
Figure 12. 3D images representative of Micro-CT analysis of rat calvarial
defects after 14 days (14 d) and 28 days (28 d) in the Blood Clot (Clot), CPSr0
and CPSr25 groups.
Figure 13. Micro-CT anaylsis considering the following parameters: (A) Bone
Volume, (b) Percent Bone Volume, (c) Trabecular Number, (c) Trabecular
Number, (c) Trabecular Number, d) Trabecular Thickness and (e) Trabecular
Separation. Values of the mean and standard error, One-way ANOVA followed
by the Tukey's post-test for comparison between groups, being * p ≤ 0.05 and **
p <0.01 for comparisons between the Clot, CPSr0 and CPSr25 groups.
Figure 14. Histological analysis of skull defects treated with clot, CPSr0 and
CPSr25 in the periods of 14 days and 28 days, postoperatively. Histological
sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin, and Masson's Trichrome.
(Magnification = 5x). Caption: v (new bone formation), CT (connective tissue), --
- (border of the bone defect).
Figure 15. Histomorphometric analysis of NBF (New Bone Formation). Values
of the mean and standard error, One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post-
test for comparison between groups, being * p ≤ 0.05, ** p <0.01 and *** p
<0.005 for comparisons between the Clot CPSr0 and CPSr25 groups.
Figure 16. Histological analysis through the degree of inflammation and degree
of vascularization. Values of mean and standard error, Kruskal-Wallis followed
by Dunn’s post-test for comparison between groups, being * p <0.05, ** p <0.01
and *** p <0.005 for comparisons between the Clot, CPSr0 and CPSr25 groups.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.