Srirupa Roy - Moving Pictures: The Postcolonial State and Visual Representations of India

Moving pictures:
The postcolonial state and

visual representations of India
Srirupa Roy
The article examines visual representations of the nation produced by state and non-
state actors in postcolonial India. Through an examination of how ’moving pictures’ of
Indianness have been produced and deployed over the past 50 years, I explore the
formation and transformations of the postcolonial nationalist imagination. I focus on
the genre of non-commercial film and video and compare the image-making efforts of
the Nehruvian developmentalist state with those of the contemporary liberalised state,
and also with images of Indian identity produced by non-state actors. The first section
examines the state’s vision through the documentary films produced by the state-owned
Films Division of India and the audiovisual fillers and shorts produced by the Department
of Audio-Visual Publicity. The state and the activities that it undertakes on behalf of the
nation are foregrounded in these visual representations of Indianness, which is depicted
as a relation between an enlightened, transcendent state and a diverse, infantile nation.
The second section examines popular-patriotic visions of India through a discussion of

the music videos produced for television in recent years by Bharatbala Productions, an
independent media organisation based in Mumbai. Although these visual representations
are significantly different in terms of form, they do not supplant or subvert the official
nationalist imaginary in any significant way. Both state and non-state actors continue
to illuminate—and obscure—Indianness in similar ways.
Srirupa Roy is at the Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts,

Amherst, MA01003, USA.
Acknowledgements: Versions of this essay have been presented at the workshop on

’Ideologies of the visual’ at the University of Michigan (May 2000), the International
Centre for Advanced Studies, New York University (May 2000), and the annual South
Asia conference, University of Wisconsin-Madison (October 2000). I am grateful to all
the participants at these events, and to Itty Abraham, Ravina Aggarwal, and Lalit Vachani
for their helpful comments.
Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

234/
’We have passed through grievous trials. We have survived them, but
at a terrible cost, and the legacy they have left in tortured minds and
stunted souls will pursue us for a long time. Our trials are not over.
Let us prepare ourselves for them in the spirit of free and disciplined
men and women .... We have to start this work of healing and we
have to build and create. The wounded body and spirit of India call
upon all of us to dedicate ourselves to this great task. May we be
worthy of the task and of India!’ (Nehru 1947).
I
Introduction
Efforts to influence the content of film-either through production or

through censorship-have been an important feature of nation-building
projects in the 20th century. For over a 100 years, nationalist entrepreneurs
in different parts of the world have actively recognised the powerful
potential and reach of the cinematic medium. However, the practical
recognition of the relevance of film to the nation-building project does
not seem to have made much of an impact on social science scholarship
on nationalism and national identity. Studies of official nationalism over-
look the deployment and impact of the cinematic nationalist imagination,
and choose instead to focus either on the ’census, map, museum’-based
activities of the state (Anderson 1991 ), or on the state’s use of educational,
linguistic and cultural policy to promote and institutionalise definitions
of national identity.2 Questions about how film is harnessed by the nation-
building cause remain unanswered.
I
The use of ’propaganda’ film in Nazi Germany and the USSR is the most commonly
cited historical example of the use of film in nation-building projects. Several postcolonial
states have also actively harnessed the cinematic medium to nation-building by setting
up state-run film production institutions, generating detailed censorship policies, and
regulating the material conditions that govern the conditions and factors of production
in the private-sector film industry i.e., the availability of film stock and financing; the
distribution of films; the conditions and locations in which they are viewed.
2
This omission stems from the dated nature of studies of official nationalism, which
take as their primary examples Czarist practices of Russification, French efforts to convert
’peasants into Frenchmen’ (Weber 1976), and the Meiji Restoration in Japan, all of
which took place about a hundred years ago. Benedict Anderson’s revised edition of
Imagined communities has an entire chapter devoted to more contemporary practices of
official nationalism, specifically, the nationalist projects undertaken by postcolonial
states. However, for Anderson, these ’new’ official nationalisms continue to deploy ’old’,
colonial tools of the ’census, map, and museum’ in their efforts to construct a unified
community, and the use of alternative media and strategies finds no mention in the
Andersonian account of official nationalism (Anderson 1991: 163-85).

235
This relatively uncharted terrain is the focus of this essay, in which I

examine the nationalist use of film by a prominent nation-building agent:
the Indian state. I focus on the genre of ’non-commercial&dquo; film and com-
pare the image-making efforts of the Nehruvian developmentalist state
with those of the contemporary liberalised state, and also with images of
Indian identity produced by non-state actors. What are the correspond-
ences and divergences among these visual representations of Indianness?
What kinds of social and political imaginaries do these visual imagin-
ations constitute-how do they represent nation, state, and citizen?
Through an examination of how ’moving pictures’ of Indianness have
been produced and deployed over the past 50 years, I explore the for-
mation and transformations of the postcolonial nationalist imagination.
Representations of ’culture as diversity’ and ’citizenship as lack’ have
dominated official nationalist image-making efforts since the early years
of the postcolonial period. The emergence of these themes can be linked
to the particular exigencies of postcolonial nation and state formation.
At midnight on 14-15 August 1947, a brief ceremony in the central hall
of Parliament in New Delhi marked the transfer of power from the British
Empire to the sovereign Indian nation-state. The Constituent Assembly
that was entrusted with the task of formulating citizenship rights, free-
doms, and responsibilities had begun its work in 1946, under the provisions
of the imperial Government of India Act of 1935. The Indian constitution
came into effect approximately three years later, on 26 January 1950.
The interim period was marked by disorienting change. This was a time
that witnessed the partition of colonial India into the nation-states of
India and Pakistan; the unprecedented violence of the Partition riots and
the sudden influx of refugees into metropolitan centres like Delhi and
Calcutta; armed conflict between India and Pakistan that required inter-
vention by the United Nations; massive food shortages and a spiralling
inflation in grain prices; the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi; and the
integration of the Princely States into the existing provincial units of
British India. The boundaries of the national state, the demographic com-
position of its people, and the nature and number of its constituent units
were all rapidly reconfigured even as the delegates of the Assembly delib-
erated on the rights, freedoms, and identity of ’we the people’. Citizenship
and representation were moving targets during these transitional years.
1947 had announced the death of the colonial subject, but the free citizen
3
This article does not discuss the genre of ’commercial cinema’ in India, or the films
that areproduced and circulated with considerations of economic profit in mind.

236/
did not yet exist; an institutional infrastructure for representing the people
was already in place, but the identity of those to be represented was still
unknown. At the same time, international templates or modular forms of
the nation-state, citizenship, and representation already existed-the hori-
zons or goals of nation and state formation for late developers could not
be invented ex novo.
In the face of this uncertainty, the national state’s task of representation
was conceptualised as an ongoing process of building and creating those
it claimed to represent. This manifested itself most clearly in official na-
tionalist discourse and its emphasis on ’becoming Indian’ rather than
’being Indian’ . Definitions of Indianness-whether in terms of citizenship
or culture-were tied to the presence and actions of the national state.
School textbooks, documentary films, museum displays, days of national
commemoration, and cultural festivals juxtaposed India’s ’natural cultural
diversity’ with the unifying activities of the state. Civic education cam-
paigns conceptualised citizenship as a horizon that could only be reached
with the helpful guidance of the state. Citizenship discourse in post-
colonial India produced an ’ethically incomplete’ (Miller 1993: xi) or
’infantile’ (Berlant 1997: 28) citizen-subject in need of statist intervention.44
Every account of citizenship was accompanied by a statement of its pre-
sent ’lack’, and of the way in which the state alone could enable the
dream of true citizenship to be realised in the future. Even after the consti-
tutional settlement of 1950 made the possession of civil, political, social
and cultural rights and freedoms a present reality, the state’s discourse
on citizenship continued to emphasise the possibilities and tasks that lay
ahead; the ’tortured minds and stunted souls’ that continued to ’pursue
us’; the ’works of healing’ that still needed to be undertaken (Nehru
1947). Citizenship, like culture, thus became a discursive site for the
production of a particular authoritative identity for the state, as the ‘great
healer’ of the Indian nation and its citizens.
4According to Berlant, this presumption of an ’infantile audience’ informs modem

discourses of nationhood and citizenship:
Central to the narrative mode of the pilgrimage to Washington, and so much other
national fantasy, is a strong and enduring belief that the best of US national
subjectivity can be read in its childlike manifestations and in a polity that organizes
its public sphere around a commitment to making a world that could contain an
idealized infantile citizen (1997: 28).
Miller’s discussion (1993) of the ’ethically incomplete’ subject interpellated by discourses

of citizenship also makes a similar point.

/237
How do these conceptions of citizenship as lack and culture as diversity

find visual expression? Fifty years later, in the new India of economic
liberalisation and Hindu nationalism, are new visual representations of
Indian identity being produced? In the following section, I begin my
discussion of these questions with an examination of documentary films
produced by state-owned Films Division of India (FDI). The FDI has
generated a corpus of more than 8,000 films in the 50-odd years of its
existence, making it the single largest producer of documentary films in
the world. Until 1996, under the terms of a compulsory exhibition and
licensing policy, owners of commercial movie theatres throughout India
were required to screen a ’state-approved’ documentary film or newsreel
before the commencement of the commercial feature film. Further, rural
distribution and viewership was secured by the FDI through its association
with several ’rural oriented’ ministries and government departments-
such as the Department of Field Publicity (a branch of the Ministry of
Information and Broadcasting, constituted to generate rural support for
the five year plans) and the Ministry of Welfare. With this framework of
distribution in place, the FDI could claim an average audience strength
of 80 million every week (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
1985).
With the advent of satellite television in the late 1980s and the rapid
increase in television and video-player owning households, attendance
at movie theatres declined, and with the rescinding of the compulsory
exhibition policy in 1996, the FDI could no longer lay claim to a captive
audience. Moreover, even during the earlier era of compulsory screening,
the extent to which audience members actually watched or actively en-
gaged with the FDI documentaries has not been measured. Nevertheless,
these official film texts have enjoyed wide circulation and public exposure
in postcolonial India. An overwhelming majority of Indians are aware
of the FDI and can recognise its films, even if they express this awareness
or recognition in terms of apathy,~ boredom, even appreciation of the
fact that they are no longer required to watch such films! In short, the
5
The compulsory screening policy of the FDI overlooked issues of reception. For
instance, the FDI was mandated to send a different newsreel or documentary film to a
movie-theatre every week, and it did so without regard to the interests of local audiences.
In a memorable instance, a film on floods was once screened to audiences in drought-
stricken Bihar! As a result, audiences often ’tuned-off’ during FDI films, and used the
time instead to ’settle down’ and wait for the commercial feature. These problems were
noted as early as 1966, by the Chanda Commission of Inquiry in its report on Docu-
mentary Films and Newsreels (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 1966).

238/
state’s intention of producing and circulating its message to the widest

possible audience-a critical goal that underlies all nation-building pro-
jects-is one that is met in and by the activities of the FDI. Despite the
ultimate ineffectiveness or the non-resonance of its message, it has played
a visible and recognisable role of articulating nationhood in postcolonial
India.
II
Seeing like the state
Colonial origins, postcolonial transformations

The term ’documentary’ was first used by the film-maker John Grierson
to describe Robert Flaherty’s film Moana (1926). For Grierson, a docu-
mentary film was one that entailed ’a creative treatment of actuality’
(Barsam 1973: 2) and it is this notion of portraying ’actuality’ or accur-
ately depicting reality that informed the earliest efforts at documentary
film-making efforts in India. The existing tradition of film-making in
India already included ’topicals’ or short films on real events,6 but these
were non-reflexive, ’random filmings of scenes’ (Narwekar 1992: 12)
devoid of any overarching structure or message. The return of three Indian
film-makers from Paris, Berlin, and Moscow led to the initiation of the
Indian ’Documentary Movement’ in the 1930s. Inspired by the example
of German kultur films, Soviet cinema (primarily the work of Sergei
Eisenstein), the work of John Grierson and Paul Rotha in England, and
Robert Flaherty and Pare Lorentz in the United States, these Indian film-
makers felt that film should have a definite social purpose of instruction,
information, and motivation. Both the choice of appropriate topics and
their creative treatment, therefore, required careful attention. Accordingly,
the earliest Indian documentaries were films made for ’the education
and enlightenment of the people’ (Pathy 1950). These included films on
the Indian nationalist movement (The Haripura Congress Session, 1938);
films appealing for funds for earthquake victims (the Imperial Film Com-
pany’s film on the Quetta earthquake); films publicising the railway sys-
tem in India (the travelogues of K. Subramaniam); and films that focused
6
Examples of such films include Reception given to Senior Wrangler, Mr R.P.
Paranjpe Great Bengal Partition Movement and procession
—1902; —1905; Bal
Gangadhar Tilak’s visit to Calcutta and procession
—1906; The terrible Hyderabad
—1908; Delhi Durbar and Coronation
flood —1911; and Cotton fire at Bombay
—1912.

/239
on a specific cultural or historical aspect of Indian reality (Mohan

Bhavnani’s Mysore-Gem of India; Keddah, on elephant trapping; and
Wrestling, on ’the various peculiarly Indian techniques of this popular
sport’) (Narwekar 1992: 15-16).
For the practitioners of its craft in the India of the 1930s, the docu-
mentary could be an agent and instrument of social change. The process
of film-making was seen as a means to a higher socio-political and refor-
matory end; and documentary film-makers implicitly identified with Paul
Rotha’s understanding of them as ’legislators of mankind’~ or builders
of a new social order. However, the impulse of social remaking did not
interrogate the authority of the colonial state, and the aim of ’educating
and enlightening’ the people continued to reproduce assumptions about
the Indian people as colonial subjects rather than as citizens of a sovereign
polity. Universal themes of modernisation (the railways; the notion of
voluntary civilian donations to help the underprivileged; even the exist-
ence of impulses of political modernity such as the Indian National Con-
gress) were showcased in an effort to trace the movement of the Indian

people in the direction of development and progress under the guidance
of the colonial state. India itself found particularist meaning as a conglom-
eration of culturally diverse and custom-bound groups.
The British colonial state had similar views on the instructive nature
and social function of the documentary film, and it was the state’s util-
isation of the documentary genre as part of its ’war effort’ during the
Second World War that gave the Indian documentary movement its first
institutional support-structure. With the onset of the war in Europe, the
British state turned to its imperial subjects for crucial assistance in the
form of manpower and strategic supplies. In 1940, the Imperial Depart-
ment of Information and its chief bureaucrat Desmond Young authorised
the constitution of a Film Advisory Board (FAB). The FAB’s mission
was to produce films that would publicise the urgency and the require-
ments of the war-situation, and would appeal for popular support. Despite
its explicitly imperial concerns, the FAB was supported by many nation-
alists, for whom the importance of engaging in an immediate battle against
fascist forces in the international arena overshadowed more localised
concerns. In fact, for some nationalists, to support the British state in the
short term was a tactical manoeuver that would enable the long term
goal of national independence to be secured. The films produced by the
7According to Barsam, Paul Rotha’s humanistic vision of the documentary film and
its creator derived inspiration from Percy Bysshe Shelley’s vision of the true artist as a
’legislator of mankind’ (Barsam 1973: 10).

240/
FAB included war-related documentaries on topics such as military

recruitment (He’s in the Navy) and military technology (The planes of
Hindustan), as well as documentaries on general themes that would
interest and inform the Indian public (Women of India; Industrial India).
However, even the latter category of ’non-propagandist’ films linked
representations of India to the presence and activities of the British state,
which was presented as the central protagonist in both Women of India
and Industrial India-the progressive and developmentalist institutional
authority that enabled India and Indians to move forward.
Further, the particular filmic form favoured by FAB officials was one
that underscored a vertical or hierarchical relation of authority between
film-maker and film-viewer, and by implication, between state and
society. The Time-Life Inc. sponsored documentary series The March of
Time (produced by Louis de Rochemont in 1938) and its authoritative
conventions such as the use of disembodied ’voice-of-God’ interpretive
narrations, the tendency to summarise personal interviews with explana-
tory comments, diagrams, and charts, and the focus on ’important people’
had a strong impact on the FAB chairman Ezra Mir, who actively encour-
aged the production of similar films for an Indian audience. The FAB
was eventually replaced by a set of three specialised organisations: the
Information Films of India (IFI), Indian News Parade (INP), and the
Army Film Centre (AFC). While newsreels and war-propaganda re-
lated films were most frequently produced, occasional creative and non-
propaganda ventures were also supported by the British state (Mohan
Bhavnani’s The private life of a silkworm; Paul Zil’s Bombay, the story
of seven isles). These films attempted to portray some aspect of Indian
life to domestic audiences, and education and information were once
again the primary motivations. The state also turned its attention to the
distribution of films, and enforced Rule 44A of the Defence of India
Rules to mandate ’compulsory exhibition’ of state-produced films by
private exhibitors all over India.
However, all official documentary production and distribution efforts
ceased in 1946, since war-propaganda efforts were no longer relevant,
and the increasingly hostile tenor of the Indian nationalist movement
necessitated the statist use of coercive rather than normative or edu-
cational compliance measures. The FAB and IFI were also viewed with
suspicion by Indian nationalists in this period, who accused these organ-
isation of the anti-national activity of ’try[ing] to dragoon an unwilling
nation into the war’ (Narwekar 1992: 23). Thus, at the time of independ-
ence in 1947, film-making was seen as irrelevant, even antagonistic to

’241
the nationalist project, and the social value of the documentary enterprise
was emphasised solely by independent film-makers in the immediate
post-independence period.
Documentary film-makers in the early years of the new republic strug-
gled to justify their endeavours to the Indian state, a struggle that seemed
particularly arduous given the colonial origins of the medium. This task
of re-inventing the documentary film as the handmaid of a national ra-
ther than a colonial state was part and parcel of a larger enterprise of re-
imagining the new, postcolonial India. As I have suggested earlier, the
redefinition of the state as national rather than colonial, of the relation
between the state and its people in terms of citizenship rather than subject-
hood, and even of the national community itself (given the geographical
and demographic reconfiguration of India after the partition in 1947)
were pressing tasks confronted by the postcolonial polity.
Several scholars have commented on the ’postcolonial anxiety’ or
’insecurities’ that haunted this practice of re-invention, as ’India’ struggled
to find distinctive meaning in a world in which the templates of nation-
hood and of statehood had been hammered out long ago. The imperatives
of ’modulation’ or the ’constitut[ion] of certain national experiences as
originals and [the definition of] the task for latecomers as replicating the
experience of such originals’ (Krishna 1999: 5) produces a nagging sense
of having arrived ’just a little too late’. Krishna and Abraham have pointed
to the resulting logic of endless temporal and spatial deference (Abraham
1998; Krishna 1999: 17) that marks the practice of postcolonial nation
and state formation, where the emphasis is on national becoming-a dy-
namic, future-oriented, ever-unfolding process. The key player in this
act of national becoming is the state-institution, which differentiates itself
from its colonial predecessor by presenting its work of guidance, dir-
ection, and planning as truly representative of the identity and interests
of the sovereign Indian people. And the claim to representativeness is
made through showcasing and highlighting the activities of the state.
In postcolonial India, this imperative of visibility was served through
the adoption of a ’monumentalist’ (Abraham 1998) style of state-
making-the undertaking of Big Projects. India after 1950 was a nation
that was defined through the big dreams of its state. On the domestic
front, this translated into a commitment to planned development through
the construction of institutional edifices and expertises that could quite
literally command the economy from a transcendent, directorial vantage-
point. Science and technology also enabled the dreams of greatness to
be literalised: the new India could, and did, build big dams, big bridges,

242/
big railway coach factories, big power plants, and big atomic reactors.
And they all existed in the name of the state, which existed in the name
of the people. The promise and practice of big development, big science,
and big technology incarnated the representative state, which in turn
incarnated the sovereign Indian nation. But this logic of visible repre-
sentation could make sense only if there was a viewer, only if a particular
act and way of seeing could be presumed. From its founding moment of
April 1948 onward, the FDI and its documentary films and newsreels
worked to constitute this gaze. The national value of the documentary
film no longer needed to be the subject of impassioned pleas put forth by
documentary film-makers. They could now be nation-builders. And the
state could now be a documentary film-maker.
In its first decade, the FDI consisted of a documentary production unit
and a newsreels unit, and each was responsible for producing at least one
new film or newsreel every week. These short films were screened before
the start of a commercial feature-film, and the large attendance at movie-

theatres, coupled with the revival of the compulsory screening policy
from the colonial period, led at least one film critic to estimate that FDI
films have an ’audience potential’ of over 10 million individuals a week
(Narwekar 1992: 25). Most of the films distributed under the FDI logo
were its own products, but a select number of films were also commis-
sioned from independent film-makers. With the state as the biggest patron
of the short film in the 1950s and 1960s, film-makers were eager to sign
contracts with the FDI, and viewed its work in very favourable terms.
The relation between the Indian state and the independent artist was
thus a collaborative and accommodative one in the immediate post-
independence period-for the most part, they shared common under-
standings about the nature and purpose of documentary film, and about
the needs of the Indian audience. Film-makers interested in establishing
themselves as creators of serious or intellectual cinema frequently turned
to the FDI for sponsorship and financial support-a list of FDI directors
and producers over the past 50 years includes names like Satyajit Ray,
Mrinal Sen, Shyam Benegal, and other pioneers of Indian cinema. For
the most part these film-makers viewed documentary film as a form that
communicates a specific message to an otherwise uninformed audience,
and that can motivate its viewers to change their attitudes and even their
actions in specific ways. The social utility of the documentary genre was
emphasised, as was the presumption that an ethically incomplete audi-
ence-an audience that needs to be made aware of something-is the
recipient of the documentary film.

243
Ideas of India
According to the FDI’s own classificatory scheme, it produces seven

different kinds of films for the ’people of India’, keeping their intrinsic
diversity in mind (Mohan 1990: 93).8 These are: Art and Experimental
Films; Biography and Personality Films; Classroom Films and Children’s
Films; Educational and Motivational Films; Defence Ministry Films;
Export and Tourist Promotion Films; and The Visit Films. Each of these
categories addresses particular needs of the ’people of India’, and con-
ceptualises both ’the people’ and ’their needs’ in different ways. What
follows is a discussion of the FDI’s professed intentions in developing
and maintaining these cinematic categories, and of the understandings
about Indian identity that each set of FDI films produces and disseminates.
Art Films are ’devoted to painting and sculpture’ and were produced
by the FDI in an effort to ’make the general public art conscious’ (Mohan
1990: 94). Although the overall intent may have been to raise awareness
about the cultural and aesthetic heritage of India as a whole, the films
produced under this mandate for the most part choose to focus on a
regionally specific art form or cultural practice, and on how such expres-
sions of regional diversity effectively denote or stand in for the nation.
Similar to the cultural floats of the Republic Day Parades (Masselos
1996; Roy 1999a; Singh 1998), the vision of Indian culture that inspires
these FDI films is a regionally disaggregated one-each region is seen
as having a distinct, unique cultural contribution to make.
The diversity-vision of the Art Films does not just entail references to
regional identity, but also depicts the distinct art and culture-related activ-
ities of other kinds of sub-national groups, such as those formed around
religious identities. Jain temples of India and Our Islamic heritage are
two such examples of representing religious diversity in cinematic terms.
However, in keeping with the diversity-speak of the Indian state, in which
cultural expressions of sub-national identity are the only legitimate
building-blocks of the diverse Indian mosaic, the FDI’s attempts to
represent religious diversity entail a translation of religious identity into
cultural and material terms. In other words, it is not the distinctive
8
As Jag Mohan writes, ’The word "People" is an expansive word representing the
people inhabiting the length and breadth of the country with their languages and economic
systems, determined by geography and agro-climatic divisions’ (Mohan 1990: 93).
Mohan’s book on the Indian documentary film was commissioned by the FDI, and
provides a discussion of the FDI and its activities from the perspective of the organisation
itself. Further, Jag Mohan, the author of the book, was actively associated with the FDI
for many years, and produced several films for them.

244
religious rituals or theological beliefs of the Jain or Muslim community

that are depicted, but rather, the way in which the distinctive religious
world-views of these sub-national communities manifest themselves in
architectural practices, and cultural performance traditions (the ’Muslim
style’ of quawaali song; the distinctive domes of the Jain temples). The
definitive status of ’regional culture’ as the constituent sub-national unit
of Indian diversity is thus upheld and underscored in the Art Films of the
FDI, which disseminate the official nationalist message that India is di-
verse ; diversity is expressed in cultural terms; and culture can be localised
and mapped onto different regional spaces within the territorial body of
the Indian nation. -
Like the educational ’Art Films’, the category of ’Biography and Per-
sonality Films’ was also developed with a similar pedagogical motive in
mind: that of acquainting Indians with their history and heritage. How-
ever, unlike Art Films, which conceptualise the heritage of the past in
anonymous and group-specific terms, Biography and Personality films
attempt to educate Indians about their past through the use of individual,
named exemplars. In their decision to immortalise selected heroes for
the Indian nation, Biography and Personality films replicate the vertical
bond of authority and hierarchy between the paternalist state and its
subject-nation, with the chosen heroes standing in for, and ultimately
standing above, the nation and its constituent individuals. The themes of
guidance and instruction are foregrounded in yet another way. Biography
and Personality Films are not just pedagogical in their aim, but present
pedagogy itself as an ultimate goal of the process of becoming national.
Indians are instructed on how they, too, can become instructors and
leaders in the future, just like the celluloid heroes from the past. The
individuals chosen for commemoration are ’those who fought the British,
emancipated the women, unravelled the mysteries of science, expounded
the philosophy of Hinduism, and enriched Indian art and culture’ (Mohan
1990: 96).
Crucial significations of ’ideal Indians’ are embedded in these choices,
with individuals who uphold the values of national sovereignty (fighting
the British), rationality and science (’unravelling the mysteries of sci-
ence’), and above all leadership/guidance and instruction (philosophers,
artists, emancipators of women) deemed worthy of emulation.9 The link
9
The choice of exemplary individuals also takes into account the representation of
regional diversity. Thus ’great men and women’ from different regions are chosen, and

245
between nationhood and instruction-the fact that individuals need to

be guided and moulded by a transcendent authority-is thus a dominant
assumption and motif of this category of FDI films, with the task of
nation-building conceptualised in terms of the indispensability of the
nation-builder’s (the state’s) authoritative presence.
The third category of films produced by the FDI is ’Classroom Films
and Children’s Films’. Once again the primary motive is pedagogical,
but this time the target audience is, quite literally, an infantile one: school-
age children. In keeping with the official nationalist conception of India
as an aggregation of different individuals and groups with distinct needs,
FDI films produced for the education of children differ from those pro-
duced for the education of ’infantilised’ or otherwise ethically incomplete
adults. These films for the most part attempt to inform young Indians
about the present realities of India, rather than about cultural heritage
and other past-oriented abstractions. Thus, geography, topography, and
natural resources rather than history and culture are the main subjects of
this category of films. Indo-Gangetic plains; Deccan tableland; Climate
of India; and A day at the Zoo are just a few examples of films that pro-
mise to ’humanise geography and to instill a love for the land among
young audiences’ (Mohan 1990: 98).10 And in the process of instilling
future citizen-nationals of the Indian republic with ’a love for the land’
(ibid.), visions of India’s natural diversity-the range and variety of
climate patterns, flora and fauna, topography, soil characteristics, mineral
wealth-are emphasised. Despite the alternative focus on nature rather
than culture, on reality rather than abstraction, the children’s films of the
FDI thus entail the reproduction of a familiar official nationalist refrain:
that of India’s intrinsic diversity.
To examine the next FDI category-‘Educational and Motivational
Films’-is to move beyond pedagogy in the sense of conveying infor-
mation, to the notion of pedagogical exhortation; of education as a call
both their ’greatness’ and their specific regional origins are highlighted, so that Indians
in different parts of the country can all have their ’own’ heroes. For example, the two
Biography and Personality Films made in 1958 were The Story of Dr Karve and Acharya
Jagadish Chandra Bose. Each film depicted their distinct contributions to science, reason,
and modernity, while also emphasising their particular regional cultural origins (Maha-
rashtra and Bengal respectively).
10
The intention of ’humanising geography’ has usually led to the creation of anthro-
pomorphic maps by nationalists, or those in which a (usually female) figure symbolising
the nation is used to fill the empty cartographic spaces of a map (Ramswamy: this
volume). In the FDI films, however, ’humanisation’ entails the depiction of local-level
cartographic detail, rather than the use of human figures.

246
for reform and self-transformation. According to the FDI, this category

of films most effectively and directly utilises the specific characteristics
of the medium of cinema, namely, its provision of a ’captive audience
[that] can be subtly influenced’, and the ability to continually re-screen
films and thereby reiterate their ’message’ (Mohan 1990: 98). Appro-
ximately one-third of films in this category provide ’practical education’:
how to convert to the Metric System; how to cope with and combat the
nation-wide shortage of food and the population explosion; how to fill
out ballot papers; how to sing the national anthem and show respect for
other symbols of national sovereignty such as the flag; and how to develop
skills of social and civic responsibility.
The participatory action envisioned by these films is sacrifice, restraint,
renunciation, or some other form of behavioural reform. Individuals are
’motivated’ to re-align their private values and actions with public or
common ones, and to consequently redefine ’self-interest’ in terms of
the group rather than the individual self. State and individual are shown
to come together in order to ’march forward’ in these FDI films about
individual initiatives. This depiction of state-nation unity enables the
identity of the state, the identity of the nation, and the nature of the re-
lation between nation and state to be specified in several ways. First, by
urging individuals to participate in creating the conditions for their own
betterment, the state is able to define itself as a representative, democratic
institution. Second, by presenting a universal, anonymous individual as
the exemplary Indian, the Indian nation gets defined in inclusive, expan-
sive terms. Third, the existence of the nation itself is deferred to a future
time-space in the narrative of these FDI films, which present Indianness
as the ultimate telos or reward of good behaviour, to be realised and
enjoyed at a future time. To accept this narrative logic is to refrain from

criticising the failures, incompleteness, and exclusivity of the nation at
the present moment: after all, we are still developing.
Finally, Defence Ministry Films, Export and Tourist Promotion Films,
and The Visit Films provide information about the state to the nation, to
the outside world, and to the state itself. For the FDI, this venture of
statist education is a crucial component of the nationalist project in India:
’In a developing country, the raison d’etre of the nationalist Films
Division is to propagate the aims and portray the activities and achieve-
ments of a welfare state’ (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 1966:
10). However, at a more basic level, it is not just a portrayal of the ’aims,
activities and achievements’ of the state-institution that is called for, but
also the ability to identify, recognise, and locate the state as a particular

247
tangible, institutional entity. The documenting of India’s defence strength,

of trade and tourism relations between India and other nations, and of
visits by Indian dignitaries abroad (and of foreign dignitaries in India) in
these three categories of films all work toward this end. In their attempt
to prove that the Indian state exists (like all other states, it has a monopoly
of violence over a given territory; it has trade and tourism relations with
other nations; heads of other states recognise its existence each time
they visit India), these films engage in an act of double denotation. Armies,
tariffs, tourists, and dignitaries stand in for the state, which then stands
in for the nation.
What ’Films Division of India presents’&dquo; in the name of India and
Indian identity is a particular envisioning of the relationship between
transcendent, authoritative state and diverse, infantile nation. As we have
seen, the use of the specific documentary form further reinforces the
vertical link of authority between the state-as-documenter, and the nation-
as-audience. But to what extent is the content dependent on the form?
Although the FDI still produces its annual quota of documentary films,
the Indian state has increasingly diverted its resources into other forms
of audiovisual production, such as television programmes, fillers or shorts,
websites, and CD-ROMs. Have, new media forms and technologies
ushered in a new official nationalist gaze? The next section attempts to
answer this question through a reading of audiovisual fillers and shorts
produced by another state agency: the Department of Audiovisual

Publicity (DAVP). By discussing a selection of DAVP productions from
1997-98, I also engage with the issue of context, in an effort to examine
whether representations of citizenship as lack and culture as diversity
are tied to a particular historical moment of postcolonial modernity in
India. Without the sepia tints, and the Anglicised barritones of Frank
Moraes, Romesh Thapar,l2 and their generation of ’god’s voices’, do we
see India differently?
Reminder notices
Like the FDI, the DAVP also traces its origins to the war-efforts of the
British colonial state, when a press advisor was appointed by colonial
authorities in an effort to provide information about the war and war-
recruitment efforts. In 1941, the press advisor’s tasks were extended to
11
Every FDI documentary and newsreel is preceded by this phrase.
12
Moraes and Thapar frequently recorded voice-overs for the FDI.

248/
include ’state advertising’, and this eventually led to the formation of a

state advertising agency under the jurisdiction of the colonial department
of Information and Broadcasting. Following independence, the DAVP
was formally declared to be the audiovisual publicity division of the
postcolonial state in 1955, and was delegated financial and administrative

authority and given status as an independent department in 1959. The
DAVP produces both print advertisements and audiovisual fillers/shorts/
spots. The print-ads range from announcements of job vacancies in gov-
ernment offices and public functions sponsored by various ministries to
posters, billboards, and messages issued in the public interest that are
signed by the generic ’Government of India’. The audiovisual spots are
likewise commissioned either by individual ministries to publicise a
particular campaign, or by the DAVP itself, which regularly selects
’nationally relevant’ themes to publicise, such as ’national integration’,
’communal harmony’, and topical events like the celebration of 50th
anniversary of Indian independence and the Indo-Pakistani conflict in
the Kargil sector of Kashmir in May 1999.13 Approximately 60 new
audiovisuals are produced each year by various ’empanelled producers’
who submit competitive proposals to the DAVP once the theme of the
proposed audiovisual is announced. The main languages used are English
and Hindi, and regional languages dubs are generated according to the
distribution plan for each audiovisual. In keeping with the Delhi-centred
spatialisation of postcolonial state power, all production work and
distribution decisions take place at the DAVP offices in Delhi, and the
regional field units are responsible solely for local-level distribution of
the products sent to them by the Delhi office.
The spatial division of labour between central production and regional
distribution appears to be a watertight one. DAVP officials in Delhi can
provide little to no information about how, when, and whether anyone
actually watches the products that they make, and use the language of
delegatory responsibility (’that’s what the field units are supposed to
do’) to explain their lack of knowledge on distribution and reception.
The production of the audiovisuals or the activity of publicity-giving
appears to be an end in itself. 14 Earlier, I discussed the postcolonial state’ss
’imperative of visibility’ or its efforts to claim representativeness by
13
Interview with Pratik Kumar, Campaign Officer, Audiovisual Cell, DAVP, 1 March
2000.
14
After repeated questioning, some officials were able to hazard a guess about distri-
bution channels: the completed audiovisuals are distributed among different ministries,
who then use their ’own distribution mechanisms’ to reach the people. The self-

/249
showcasing the activities that it undertakes for the sake of the people.
The DAVP’s preoccupation with image-making for its own sake-its
emphasis on production rather than distribution-is consistent with the
logic of the visibility imperative; in this case it is the state’s activity of
envisioning that is being rendered visible. In a further instance of the
imperative of visibility at work, the DAVP’s choice of themes and of
formal treatment consistently enables instant recognition of its products
as state-made or official ones. It seems that the effort to imprint its pro-
ducts with the distinctive flourish of the state’s authorial signature is
more important to the DAVP than the effort to ensure that the products
will circulate and have a far-reaching public impact.&dquo;
Like other practices of official nationalism in India, the singularly
unimaginative and ponderously bureaucratic approach of the DAVP is
immediately apparent to the observer, especially when alternative, more
creative treatments of the same nationalist themes can and do circulate
in the public domain. However, it is precisely the contrast between the
’patriotic videos’ produced by non-state actors, and the clumsy formal
techniques of the DAVP’s audiovisuals, that enables the state to elaborate
its distinctive identity as image-maker.
The themes of ’nationally relevant’ 16 audiovisuals include ’unity in
diversity’, ’communal harmony’, ’national integration’, ’the importance
of education’, ’Indian culture’, ’history and heritage’, and ’famous
people’. What is most striking about these audiovisuals, in comparison
with the official nationalist vision of the FDI documentaries, is the
way in which they narrate national time. FDI documentaries chart the
journey of progressive movement that the nation will undertake under
the able guidance of the developmentalist state. In accordance with the
presentation of DAVP as a producer rather than a distributor was also emphasised by

Pratik Kumar, in his discussion of how DAVP has ’hardly any funds’ to afford to pay for
television broadcasts of its material. Although DAVP sends copies of its programmes to
the state-owned Doordarshan television channel, the decision to broadcast (or not) is
made by Doordarshan, and in most cases, DAVP does not know about the final outcome.
Interview with Pratik Kumar, 1 March 2000.
15
Elsewhere, I have discussed how the postcolonial state’s ’policyspeak’ works to
constitute a particular bureaucratic identity for the state (Roy 1999b: 121-86).
16
Upon visiting the DAVP offices and explaining the nature of my research project,
the campaign officer in charge of the audiovisual archives selected a series of shorts,
spots, and fillers that he felt were ’suitable’ for my interest in nationalism. When I asked
for other audiovisuals (such as a series on malaria prevention), I was told that these
were ’uninteresting’ since they were ’too specialised’ and not really for purposes of
’national awareness’. Visit to DAVP, 8 March 2000.

250
overarching framework of nation-building, the FDI snapshots of the

Indian present vividly evoke the promise of the future: the farmer sows
his high-yielding variety seeds; Nehru inaugurates the Bhakra Nangal
Dam; railway tracks traverse a blank screen in rapidly fading dissolves;
and young girls go to school.
In the FDI vision, the here-and-now of the nation exists as a bridge
between the glory of the past and the righteousness of the future17- the
contemporary gaze that pans from the smooth domes of the Bhabha
Atomic Research Centre to the pitted fagade of the Elephanta Caves.
The glorious past-that which will be realised in the future-is con-
ceptualised as pre-colonial history (architecture is a common trope); the
’living’ tradition of cultural diversity (visually represented through the
diversity-montage of folk performance and costumes); and the ’natural’
heritage of geography, mineral resources, plant and animal life. Moreover,
all of these embodiments of the past and its glories are located elsewhere
from the temporal and spatial present of the viewer (the distant Himalayas;
the dancing Naga tribals at the outer limits of the Indian geobody; the
Buddhist stupa in Bihar from centuries ago; the yellow gold from deep
within the Kolar mineshafts). In the cinematic vision of the FDI, getting
to the past-like getting to the future-requires work, patience and sacri-
fice, and of course, the guiding and enabling hand of the representative
state.
In the DAVP audiovisuals, however, time ticks differently. A sense of
reflexive contemporaneity suffuses each frame. We are not invited to
move out-of-frame toward the future or the past, but instead to move
within the present, to reread it as simultaneous palimpsest and foundation,
and to undertake acts of individual excavation and individual growth.
To give one example of the DAVP’s temporal narration of national time,
in the audiovisual commemorating the birth centenary of the nationalist
leader Subhas Chandra Bose, the initial mise-en-sc6ne is of an urban
family (parents, grandparents, and a young boy), shown with all the
accoutrements of modem middle-class life. The child starts putting on a
khaki military outfit, while the indulgent family looks on. As he stands
in front of the mirror and adjusts his khaki cap, his eyes alight on a por-
trait of Bose in identical garb. Bose’s distinctive black-framed spectacles
catch the child’s eye, and he looks down at the dresser to see a similar
17
This is best captured in Nehru’s words on the midnight of 14-15 August 1947,
when he narrated the present experience of the birth of the Indian nation as a ’tryst with
destiny’ made ’long long years ago’ (Constituent Assembly of India Debates 1947).

/251
pair of glasses, in all probability belonging to the grandfather. He puts

them on, the large frames slipping down his nose, and solemnly salutes
his own reflection. The mirror also captures the amused-yet-proud smile
of the grandfather, and a freeze-frame signals the end of the audiovisual,
along with the opening bars of a familiar Indian National Army song
(Bose’s signature tune) and the words: ’Netaji [Respected Leader, a
popular epithet for Bose] Birth Centenary’. The investment of nationalist
agency in the child, and his communication with his grandfather, brings
together the future and the past without eliding the present moment. In
fact, it is the present with its supply of Netaji costumes and portraits and
mirrors that makes this remembrance of Netaji possible.
In a striking departure from the FDI’s vision of nationalist awakening
and activity as arduous, ascetic, even grim work, the DAVP’s vision is a
kinder, gentler, and infinitely easier one. The individual as nation-builder
does not have to labour in the fields or learn to ’stand in queue&dquo;’ in
public places. Instead, she can smile at her grandchild, play with a few
neighbourhood kids, and simply ’remember’ all that the nation and the
state have done for her. It is to the issue of nationalist remembrance that
I now turn. It is my contention that the DAVP’s audiovisuals address
themselves to the remembrance of nation-building, rather than to nation-
building itself. At the same time, however, this staging of memory con-
tinues to be a selective one, in which certain visions of India, Indians,
and Indianness are foregrounded, while others continue to be obscured.
In an overwhelming majority of the DAVP’s ’nationally relevant’
audiovisuals, the familiar ’diversity-speak’ (Roy 1999a) of official na-
tionalism interpellates India. The formal device most commonly used is
one of a quick visual montage that cuts in shots of natural or topographical
diversity (mountain, desert, ocean, plains) with shots of cultural folk di-
versity (the Kathakali dancer, the Naga tribal with his distinctive headgear,
the boatman on the Ganges singing a Bhatiali folk song). Such audio-
visuals usually end with a caption affirming the natural-cultural diversity
of India, such as ’Azaadi ke rang areek; Swatantrata ke rang anek’ (Free-
dom has many colours; Independence has many colours). Religious di-
versity is also on display in a series of audiovisuals produced to promote
communal harmony, as people belonging to different religions are shown
to visit different places of worship. While all these audiovisuals explicitly
showcase diversity as the characteristic feature of India and Indianness,
the theme of unity-as-concatenation, or the bringing together of these
18
The Agriculture series and Civic sense series produced by the FDI are examples of
this.

252/
sub-national diversities is also an important one. In some of the audio-

visuals, the emphasis on unity (and by extension, on the unifying agent
or force) occurs in a subtle way through a final freeze-frame in which
the individual pieces of the diversity-mosaic come together. In others, a
caption or a voice-over does the work of reminding us that the ’many
colours’ that we have just seen are all attributes of a singular Freedom or
Independence. Finally, some of the audiovisual representations of di-
versity also incorporate images of unity in the montage, juxtaposing the
shots of natural and cultural differences with shots of the nation ’working
together’ under the guidance of the state, whether as marching soldiers,
scientists in state laboratories, or children in rural government schools.
The DAVP’s depiction of the diverse nation that has been unified in
and through the activities of the transcendent and strong state-institution
thus continues to reproduce the official nationalist understanding of
Indianness that has prevailed over the past 50 years. Similar statements
about ’unity in diversity’ have also been made in the FDI documentaries.
For the most part, they have conceptualised unity as a process in the
making, by foregrounding the unifying activities of the state and urging
citizen-nationals to participate in the act of building the nation. The
DAVP’s version of the ’unity in diversity’ statement lacks this exhortative,
action-oriented, and future-directed appeal to its audience. As I suggested
earlier, it works instead as a ’reminder notice’ about all that the state has
already done for the sake of the nation and its unity. The future that the
FDI documentaries promised in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s has become
the past of the DAVP audiovisuals. In the moving images of official
nationalism in the 1990s, the activities of the state over the past 50 years
have become the stuff of national memory.
III
Re presentations
’Dear Netizen, The night of 15th August 1999 will be a memorable
and magical moment-a timeless phenomenon when all the Indian
musical maestros from the classical to the contemporary will rise
together with 960 million Indians all over the world for the first time
ever linked through every television channel, radio network and on
the web in making this a historical moment-the ultimate Independ-
ence Day in this century .... So at 8:00 p.m. to 8:10 p.m. 15th AUGUST
1999, LOG ON FOR TEN MINUTES-STAND UP FOR INDIA.

Will u be there?’ (http://www.neworleanscinema.com/guestbook.html)

’253
Desh ka salaam to the Nation) was a multimedia presentation

(Salute
conceptualised by G. Bharat and Kanika Meyer Bharat of Bharatbala
Productions, a film production company in Bombay that has been pro-
ducing ’patriotic’ audiovisuals since 1997. Released in the immediate
aftermath of the Indo-Pakistani conflict in the Kargil sector of Kashmir
in 1999, Desh ka salaam was dedicated to the ’heroes’ and ’martyrs’ of
Kargil-the soldiers who had risked their lives in the name of the nation
and its citizens. The presentation, which was simultaneously broadcast
on the Internet and on all Indian television channels, consisted of a ’soul-
ful rendition of the Indian National Anthem as never before’ (http://

www.plexustech.net/news/release4.htm). Bharatbala Productions, along
with its web technology provider Plexus Technologies, promised new
visions of India and more importantly, new ways of being national. Cor-
poreal presence in Indian territory was no longer required-with a single
click of the mouse, people from ’all over the world’ could simultaneously
enter the time-space of the Desh ka salaam presentation and salute the
nation. 19
Desh ka salaam begins with a shot of the Amar jawaan jyoti (Flame
of the Eternal Soldier) in Delhi, thereby framing its message as a tribute
or homage to past and present Indian soldiers. This is followed by an
audiovisual presentation of two renditions of the Indian national anthem:
one instrumental, the other vocal. The instrumental version brings to-
gether nine prominent Indian musicians who are filmed against the stark
and mountainous backdrop of the Ladakh district of Kashmir. Shots of
the musicians dissolve into shots of Indian soldiers and of the Indian
national tricolour flag. The perspective constantly shifts from a fore-
grounding of human creativity and agency (the musicians) to a fore-
grounding of natural, untrammelled splendour (the landscape). At times
the musicians crowd into the foreground, at times they are distant specks
at the base of lofty mountains. And in a characteristic visual technique
that marks all Bharatbala audiovisuals, the use of dramatic low-angle
shots and crane-shots enables the fluttering tricolour flag to tower over
the musicians, the soldiers, the landscape, the frame itself.
After a short fade-to-black, the vocal rendition of the national anthem
commences. Twelve ’legendary’ vocalists are filmed singing different
19
Sumathi Ramaswamy has made the insightful observation that this deterritorialised
mode of nationalist address constitutes a ’portable nationalism’ that is in sharp contrast
to the more fixed or ’landed’ nationalist imagination from an earlier historical moment,
such as the one she discusses in her contribution to this volume (personal communication,
April 2001). See also Ramswamy, this volume.

254
sequences of the anthem in medium-to-close shot. This part of the clip is

entirely in black and white, except for the tricolour pendant that is worn
by the first female singer, and the stylised graphic of the national flag
that unfurls across the screen at the end of the presentation and fills the
entire frame. Like the musicians in the instrumentalist rendition, the vocal-
ists each bring their own distinctive creative styles to the performance of
the national anthem. They are filmed singing their own lines in isolation,
and are then shown to come together at the end, to sing the triumphant
Jaya, Jaya, Jaya, Jaya he (Victory to Thee) refrain that concludes the ’
national anthem.
A few months later, this audiovisual was incorporated into Bharatbala’ss
millennium gift to the nation: the multimedia presentation Jana Gana
Mana 2000. Permanence rather than instantaneous and ephemeral
experience was the selling point of this project, which included the launch
of a website (http://janaganamana.satyamonline.com), and the production
of a book, an audio CD and a multimedia CD-ROM that could be pur-
chased online or in stores. While the initial Internet broadcast of Desh ka
salaam had called for a time-bound experience of nationalism (you
needed to log on between 8:00 and 8:10 p.m. IST on 15 August 1999),
the CD-ROM promised to be a ’must-have for every Indian who loves
reliving the electric experience every time they hear our beloved Anthem’
(http:/ljanaganamana.satyamonline.com/product.asp). In keeping with
the mandate of enabling the ’reliving [of] the electric experience’, the
new website contains a clip of the audiovisual that can be accessed by
anyone, anywhere, at any time, and over and over again. In addition, it
provides links to information about the history and the lyrics of the na-
tional anthem, alongside links to information on the making of the video
and on distribution and sales information for products. In the atemporality
of cyberspace, Tagore’s making and Bharatbala’s remaking-the anthem
of 1911 and its millennial counterpart-are equivalently located, just
one click away from the home page. -
The national anthem of any country, like its flag, is an index of

sovereign statehood; that which stands in for a state in the world of states.
Its adoption requires the stamp of official, bureaucratic, constitutional
authority-it is an expression of official nationalism. In this light, Bharat-
bala’s decision to re-ignite nationalist passions through the national an-
them can be seen as an endorsement of official nationalism, a celebration
of the nation through a celebration of the state. Indeed, Bharatbala’s na-
tionalist credentials were lauded by the state on the occasion of the Jana
Gana Mana 2000 launch, which took place on the 50th anniversary of

/ 255
the Indian constitution (26 January 2000)-the day the nation celebrated
the birth of its state. The event itself was staged in the national capital
at the very heart of state power, the central hall of Parliament, and under
the gaze of president Narayanan. Prime Minister Vajpayee posed for
photographs with the producers, declaring their work to be ’magnificent’
(http:www.plexustech.net/news/release4.html). The Department of Cul-
ture provided financial assistance for the project, and the Ministry of
Information and Broadcasting issued polite but firm requests for television
coverage to all television channels. From this example at least, it seems
that the ’new’ nationalism of Bharatbala can harmoniously coexist with
official nationalism-the forms, technologies, and even motivations may
vary, but the JGM project appears to be a continuation of the state’s own
story.
The complicity between Bharatbala’s nationalist vision and that of
the Indian state may have come of age with this particular multimedia
production, but its origins can be traced to the Vande Mataram series,
which coincided with the 50th anniversary of Indian independence in
1997 and marked the entry of Bharatbala into the nascent pop patriotism
market in India. The first project in this series was a music video by A.R.
Rahman, which featured an ’updated’ version of Bankim Chandra Chatto-
padhya’s Vande Mataram, a song that had been popularised by the na-
tionalist movement in the colonial period. The song is renamed Ma Tujhe
Salaam (Mother I Salute You), which is a colloquial Hindi translation of
Bankim’s Sanskrit title, and one that adopts a more intimate, domesticated
and informal mode of address to the mother-nation.2° The video was
filmed in the deserts of Rajasthan. Panoramic shots of the vast expanses
of the Thar desert are juxtaposed with shots of Rahman singing, dressed
in spotless white; close-ups of tribally marked men and women with
haunting expressions; moving shots of children running; and an enormous
tricolour flag being hoisted by hordes of peasants and tribals, who look
up in wonder and smile at their triumphant flag as the music fades away.
The music video was broadcast on television channels throughout
1997, along with 300 other short films of one minute duration produced
by Bharatbala and sponsored by the makers of toothpaste, Colgate-
Palmolive Inc. (appropriately entitled ’A reason to smile’). These con-
sisted of brief ’talking head’ shots of different individuals, ranging from
Nobel peace laureates such as Arafat, Gorbachev, Peres, and Mandela,
20
I am grateful to Kajri Jain for pointing out these implications of ’intimate address’
(Email communication, April 2001).

256/
to prominent Indian actors, performance artists, and sportspeople, and

finally to ’ordinary Indians’ such as old freedom fighters, village women,
tribal people, and young children. In this series, each person expresses
what ’freedom’, ’peace’, ’India’ or Vande Mataram means to them, and
the spot ends with the person saying Vande Mataram as a graphic of the
Indian tricolour unfurls to fill the screen.21
In 1998 a sequel to the first video, Vande Mataram 2, was released,
with Lata Mangeshkar performing her own rendition of the song. The
video featured Lata (also in white) and a giant tricolour that soared high
above the anonymous masses crouching at its base, but it did not locate
itself in one particular site. As the song unfolds, the viewer embarks on
a journey of discovering India’s natural and human diversity. She is taken
from mountain to seashore as she treads the time-worn nationalist path
’from Kashmir to Kanyakumari’, locating herself in the border-zones of
the Indian geo-body in the effort to grasp the sheer magnitude of the
land. She sees differently marked bodies of tribals, peasants, and children,
who are as different from each other as they are from her. And -like the
previous video, all bodies, places, and times come together in the final
moments of Vande Mataram 2 under-and as-the tricolour flag. The
viewer is invited to enter a boundless terrain emptied of historical, lived
presence, where bodies are but signs to read. The villager, the tribal, the
Kashmiri, and the soldier in the videos are as unreal as the musician
whose starched white clothes withstand sea spray and sandstorms. They
are as surreal as the gigantic tricoloured flag of the state.
The story of the making of the Vande Mataram series of its makers
has been publicised as much as the actual series itself. In fact, I would
argue that the narrative of G. Bharat’s transformation from ’seller of
toothpaste’ to ’marketer of the nation’, and the signification of A.R.
Rahman (the musical collaborator on the project) as the exemplary Indian
are integral components of the new nationalist vision produced by
Bharatbala. The emphasis placed on the technological novelty that marks
Vande Mataram’s production and dissemination is similarly not just a
marketing or publicity-seeking strategy, but is part of the definition of
nationhood that Bharatbala seeks to promote. The emphasis on techno-
logical innovation; G. Bharat’s self-transformation; and A.R. Rahman’s
impeccable nationalist credentials; the choice of Vande Mataram as the
21
As part of the 50th anniversary initiative, Bharatbala also produced a Vande
Mataram audiocassette and CD (with a specially designed cover graphic of the Indian
tricolour) with songs commissioned to reflect ’the spirit of Indian nationalism’.

/ 257
subject for a new nationalist initiative; and finally, the visual vocabulary
of the Vande Mataram series together comprise the entirety of the ’new’
nationalist vision. It is the combination of these elements that enables
this new nationalist vision to legitimise Hindu nationalism-the current
ideology of the state-by reframing its message in generic and familiar
terms, as a variant of the official nationalism of yore.
In November 1997, shortly after the Vande Mataram series had been
made available to the television-viewing public in India, an article by
Lavina Melwani appeared in Little India, an Internet magazine produced
in the US for the Indian diaspora. By way of introducing the series and
its creators, the article begins with four apparently rhetorical questions:
Would Yasser Arafat, Shimon Peres, Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu,

Nelson Mandela, and Mikhail Gorbachev all appear in a film made
by a little-known Indian producer of advertising films? Could an old
patriotic song from the 30s, almost forgotten by modem India, sud-
denly become the rage on MTV and be shown simultaneously on
every network from Star TV to Doordarshan to Zee TV? Could what
started out as a Hindu chant in the British Raj be transformed by a
Muslim singer-composer into a galvanizing wake-up call for modem
India, and catch the imagination of an entire nation? Would Indians
of all ages stop whatever they were doing to watch 300 films about
patriotism and rush out to buy half a million cassettes of a non-filmi
song in the first week of its release? (http://206.20.14.67/achal/archive/
Nov97/freedom.htm)
’Highly unlikely’ is Melwani’s immediate answer. The rest of the article

goes on to marvel at the existence of the counter-factual. The questions
serve to highlight commonplace assumptions about India, and the Vande
Mataram series will shortly be shown to shatter them all. The selective
choice of assumptions-worth-shattering points to the kinds of positive
interventions that the Vande Mataram series is seen to Make, and by ex-
tension, to its limits and its silences. Hidden beneath these opening state-
ments of disillusionment about what India is not, are glimpses of what
India wants to be.
The theme of international recognition is the most persistent one,
explained in part by the fact that Melwani is writing with the interests of
her diasporic audience in mind. However, her article draws upon
interviews with G. Bharat and A.R. Rahman that have also appeared in
Indian publications, and Vande Mataram’s role in enabling the emergence

258 /
of India as an international player is consistently lauded in these as well.

As Bharat himself explains:
[This] is a global statement from India to the world. We call ourselves

the largest democracy in the world, we have given Mahatma Gandhi
to the world, we have given the philosophy of ahimsa to the world.
Lots of people talk about world peace-so I thought let’s talk about
world peace in the land of ahimsa, and create a new sound from the
subcontinent (http://206.20.14.67/achal/archive/Nov97/freedom.htm).
The willingness of Nobel peace laureates to participate in the Vande

Mataram series is a sign of the success and the uniqueness of this‘global
statement’. In Bharat’s narrative, ’it was all just so unique that everyone
got excited. When we showed it to Dalai Lama [sic], he said what an
idea!’ (ibid.). However, the ultimate effectiveness of the Vande Mataram
series’ international appeal is not its uniqueness, but the way in which it
lends itself to perfect translation: ‘[s]ince Vande Mataram means &dquo;sa-
lutations to your motherland&dquo; in Sanskrit, Arafat could salute his country,
and Gorbachev could salute his country; it’s really a global idea’ (ibid.).
To read this comment closely is to realise that the quest for universal
recognition often entails an erasure of the particular, and equally, that a
performance of universal recognition-Arafat and Gorbachev saying
Vande Mataram-does not make it ’real’. These two aspects of India’s
quest for international status-the erasure of the particular and the im-
portance of performative gestures of international status-also mark the
policy decisions taken by the Indian state in recent years, with the nuclear
testing decision of May 1998 as the most obvious example. For the mo-
ment, this serves as one more instance of the way in which Bharatbala
and the Indian state dream of the same India.
Melwani’s second frisson of incredulous excitement is occasioned by
the way in which the Vande Mataram series forges cultural connections
between the present and the past. Bharat modestly accounts for this in
terms of the ’latent nationalism’ that has always been present in Indian
hearts and minds; his task has merely been one of articulation, encourage-
ment, and the ’repackaging’ of nationalism to fit contemporary times.
As he explains to Melwani, he himself was ’awakened’ by his father, a
freedom-fighter: &dquo;‘How long are you going to keep on selling Coca-Cola
and Pepsi? Why can’t you do something for the country in your own
field?&dquo; [the father] demanded to know of his son’ (ibid.). Bharat took
this to heart, and soon disvcovered that ’selling the country was not very

’259
different from selling Coca-Cola’ (ibid.). Elsewhere, Bharat elaborates

on some of the strategies that he used to ’sell the country’, such as the re-
course to music, which has universal and national appeal; the involvement
of ’real people’ and children in the video to provide the viewer with
points of identification; and the articulation of Indian nationalism as a
’global idea’ so that one can be ’both Indian and some other thing at the
same time’ (Kaviraj 1994: 18).
Vande Mataram’s success in awakening nationalism is measured by
Melwani in terms of sales volumes and viewership statistics (her third
source of wonder), but Bharat cites different measures of success: ’[w]e
have covered so many unknown freedom fighters in this project that
it’s given a respect for elderly people, so it’s helped a lot’ (http://www.
users.cs.umn.edu/~subraman/rahman/articles/deccan.html). For Bharat,
the project of repackaging nationalism to suit the India of the 1990s
entails reminding people of the ’ordinary things and the little things that
are just so so Indian’ (ibid.). From Bharat’s description of success we
may add that the intended outcome of these nationalist initiatives is also
measured in ’ordinary’ and ’little’ terms-collective social and political
action is not necessary, it is not even called for. The worship of the nation
does not call into question the authority of the state.
Thus far I have contended that Bharatbala’s ’new’ nationalist vision
shores up the presumptions of official nationalism. Its multimedia pro-
ductions uphold state symbols such as the national flag and the national
anthem, and enable the state’s quest for international stature by translating
Indianness as a global idea. The familiar themes of sub-national natural
and human diversity are emphasised, and nationalist fervour is channelled
in non-political directions. The depoliticising impulse of Bharatbala’s
vision is particularly significant, since it reconciles the new India of Hindu
nationalism and economic liberalisation with the official nationalism of
Nehruvian India.
The figure of A.R. Rahman is central to this reconciliation. Rahman
is the exemplary Indian. He is a ’music whiz-kid’ (ibid.) who can move
effortlessly from discussions of Stravinsky and jazz to the differences
between Punjabi pop and Hindustani classical music (he appreciates them
all) (http://www.timesofindia.com/280100/28home7.htm). He has
achieved international fame with his universalist music, yet he is modest
and humble and his desires remain nation-bound: ’for me a small village
in Kanyakumari is as important as New York or France’ (ibid.). He is the
living embodiment of the secular ideal: a Hindu who converted to Islam,
a devout Muslim who worships the nation with a Sanskrit hymn. He is

260/
the fulfilled promise of national integration: a Tamil devotee of the Indian

nation who patiently learned Hindi for a year before attempting to recite
the nationalist litany. And most importantly, he is an artist, who views
his work as an individual expression of creativity, far removed from the
profane realm of petty politics. He is ’tired’ of the endless communal
controversy that always surrounds Vande Mataram.22 He wants us all to
move on, to ’stop fighting like children over a chocolate’ (http://www.
rediff.com/chat/rahmchat.html).
The location of Rahman in a transcendent space outside the political
reproduces a long-standing trope of official nationalism in postcolonial
India. The discursive demarcation of a sublime zone of ‘antipolitics’ ’
from the messy, petty, profane politics of everyday life (Hansen 1999)
had produced the Nehruvian developmentalist state as the transcendent
’healer’ of the nation; the authoritative entity that alone could undertake
the ’work of healing ... build[ing] and creasing]’ independent India
(Nehru 1947). Fifty years later, a similar flight to a safe space ’outside
politics’ seems to offer a Hindu nationalist state with an open disdain for
Nehruvian India a chance to legitimise itself in familiar terms. However,
in contemporary Hindu nationalist India, the antipolitical is no longer
just a discursive trope. It is fast becoming a political device used to
streamline the present into a monolithic vision of sameness. One wonders
what the cost will be if we stop ’fighting like children over a chocolate’,
if the irreducible and ceaseless antagonisms of democracy are silenced.
IV
Conclusion
What does ’seeing like the state’ entail? Do non-state actors see India
differently? This essay has examined the production and deployment of
visual representations of Indianness by the postcolonial Indian state and
by non-state actors with a view to answering such questions. Through a
discussion of the documentary films produced by the Films Division of
India and of the audiovisual fillers and shorts produced by the Department
of Audio-Visual Publicity, I have argued that these ’moving pictures’ of
Indianness work to constitute a ’state effect’ (Mitchell 1991)-that visions
of the state are produced in and through visual representations of the
22
Here Rahman is reacting to the public protests that erupted in response to a decision
taken by the government of Uttar Pradesh state in 1999 that made it compulsory for
school children to sing Vande Mataram every morning. Vande Mataram’s Hindu
nationalist imagery was the specific target of the protest.

261
nation. In this first sense of ’seeing like the state’, then, what is seen is
the state itself-whether in terms of what it will do for the nation or
what it has done already; whether in the futurist temporalities that mark
the FDI’s vision or in the DAVP’s remembrance of things past. The state
emerges as the central protagonist in these cinematic narratives of Indian-
ness-as the unifier and facilitator of the culturally diverse nation; as
the undertaker of Big Development Projects; as the kindly guide exhorting
the citizen-subject to become appropriately modem; as the narrator of a
singular narrative of Indian history.
Second, to see like the state is also to see the state as viewer-it is to
recognise the distinctive authorial flourish of the state’s signature. FDI
and DAVP re-presentations of Indianness are marked by the formative
traces of both the colonial and the Nehruvian will-to-vision, where what
we see directs us to the gaze of the omniscient viewer, to the transcendent,
statist eye in the panopticon. In contrast to Foucauldian discussions of

the invisibility and interiority of panoptic-disciplinary power in Western
societies, in postcolonial India it is the ’hypervisibility of the apparatus
of power and its operations on the social body’ that is the most distinctive
feature (Anagnost 1997). In discussing what ’seeing like the state’ entails
in the Indian context, Anagnost’s rich discussion of the operation of power
in the Chinese socialist state comes to mind: ’the tower at the centre is
not entirely a darkened space inhabited by an invisible gaze by an illumin-
ated stage from which the party calls, &dquo;Look at me! I make myself visible
to you. Your return gaze completes me and realises my power&dquo;’ (ibid.).
Both form and content come together to render visible the state’s gaze.
The documentary form with its ’voice-of-god’ narrative devices and its
totalising montage, the clumsily edited DAVP shorts that stand in stark
contrast to the slickly produced patriotic music videos made by non-
state actors, all serve as ’reminder notices’ that it is the state that re-
presents these images. From this perspective, to see like the state is to
partake of a ’disenchanted vision’ of the nation (Ramaswamy, this
volume; Taylor, this volume), and to thereby recognise that the state is
doing the seeing. In contrast, the moving pictures of Indianness produced
by non-state actors engage with affective registers. The images in the
Bharatbala videos are not just aesthetically more pleasing and techno-
logically more sophisticated, but are more emotion-laden. They mix
intimacy with awe-the intimate address of Ma Tujhe Salaam in com-
bination with the giant sign of the tricolour flag and other Riefenstahlian
images of monumental state power.

262
In the moving pictures made by Bharatbala Productions, the state is

no longer explicitly shown and told-it exists as a sign, finding symbolic
expression in the form of icons, musical riffs, and particular combinations
of colours. However, such instances of formal divergence do not translate
into substantive differences in content. Bharatbala continues to see like
the state-India is represented through montages of ’natural’ cultural
and geographic diversity, the rural heartland continues to fill the screen,
and galloping horsemen defending the nation’s frontiers update the
familiar rhetoric of ’national security’ for a nuclear, post-Kargil India.
The adoption of different modes of nationalist story-telling in the ’new
India’ of the 1990s does not necessarily lead to the telling of different
Indian stories; the producers of these ’patriotic videos’ do not subvert or
supplant the official nationalist understanding of Indianness. This conclu-
sion invites us to interrogate the assumption about the mutually exclusive
and contradictory imaginaries that are produced by agents of globalisation
and agents of nationalism, and to recognise that the production of an
Indian brand of multinationalism can also entail an accommodative
engagement with the national state. It also urges us to rethink the appar-
ently apolitical project of branding or marketing India, and to realise
that each envisioning of the nation-whether by the state or by non-
state actors-is an act of simultaneous illumination and obscuring.
REFERENCES
ABRAHAM, ITTY. 1998. The making of the Indian atomic bomb: Science, secrecy and the
postcolonial New Delhi: Orient Longman.
state.
ANAGNOST, ANN. 1997. National past-times: Narrative, representation, and power in

modern China. Durham: Duke University Press.
ANDERSON, BENEDICT. 1991. Imagined communities. London: Verso.
BARSAM, RICHARD. 1973. Non-fiction film: A critical history. New York: E.P. Dutton.
BERLANT, LAUREN. 1997. The queen of America goes to Washington city: Essays on sex
and citizenship. Durham: Duke University Press.
HANSEN, THOMAS BLOM. 1999. The saffron wave: Democracy and Hindu nationalism in
modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
KAVIRAJ, SUDIPTA. 1994. Crisis of the nation-state in India. Political studies special issue:
115-29.
KRISHNA, SANKARAN. 1999. Postcolonial insecurities. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
MASSELOS, JIM. 1996. India’s Republic Day: The other 26 January. South Asia 19:
183-203.
MILLER, TOBY. 1993. The well-tempered self: Citizenship, culture, and the postmodern,
subject. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

’263
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING. 1966. The Chanda commission report on

documentary films and newsreels. New Delhi: Government of India.
—. 1985. Annual report 1984-95. New Delhi: Government of India.
MITCHELL, TIMOTHY. 1991. The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their
critics. American political science review 85: 77-96.
MOHAN, JAG. 1990. Documentary films and national awakening. New Delhi: Publications
Division, Government of India.
NARWEKAR, SANJIT. 1992. Films Division and the Indian documentary. New Delhi:
Publications Division, Government of India.
NEHRU, JAWAHARLAL. 1947. Selected speeches. New Delhi: Publications Division,
Government of India.
PATHY, P.V. 1950. A document on Indian documentary. The people, 2 July.
ROY, SRIRUPA. 1999a. Instituting diversity: Official nationalism in post-independence
India. South Asia 22, 1: 79-99.
—. 1999b. Divided we stand: Diversity and national identity in India Ph.D. dis-
sertation, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Political Science.
SINGH, B.P. 1998. India’s culture: The state, the arts, and beyond. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
WEBER, EUGEN. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Srirupa Roy - Moving Pictures: The Postcolonial State and Visual Representations of India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Srirupa Roy - Moving Pictures: The Postcolonial State and Visual Representations of India

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Srirupa Roy - Moving Pictures: The Postcolonial State and Visual Representations of India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moving pictures:

The postcolonial state and

The second section examines popular-patriotic visions of India through a discussion of

Srirupa Roy is at the Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts,

Acknowledgements: Versions of this essay have been presented at the workshop on

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

Efforts to influence the content of film-either through production or

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

This relatively uncharted terrain is the focus of this essay, in which I

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

4According to Berlant, this presumption of an ’infantile audience’ informs modem

Miller’s discussion (1993) of the ’ethically incomplete’ subject interpellated by discourses

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

How do these conceptions of citizenship as lack and culture as diversity

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

state’s intention of producing and circulating its message to the widest

Colonial origins, postcolonial transformations

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

on a specific cultural or historical aspect of Indian reality (Mohan

gress) were showcased in an effort to trace the movement of the Indian

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

FAB included war-related documentaries on topics such as military

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

the start of a commercial feature-film, and the large attendance at movie-

recipient of the documentary film.

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

According to the FDI’s own classificatory scheme, it produces seven

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

religious rituals or theological beliefs of the Jain or Muslim community

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

between nationhood and instruction-the fact that individuals need to

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

for reform and self-transformation. According to the FDI, this category

enjoyed at a future time. To accept this narrative logic is to refrain from

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

tangible, institutional entity. The documenting of India’s defence strength,

produced by another state agency: the Department of Audiovisual

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

include ’state advertising’, and this eventually led to the formation of a

postcolonial state in 1955, and was delegated financial and administrative

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

presentation of DAVP as a producer rather than a distributor was also emphasised by

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

overarching framework of nation-building, the FDI snapshots of the

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

pair of glasses, in all probability belonging to the grandfather. He puts

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

sub-national diversities is also an important one. In some of the audio-

1999, LOG ON FOR TEN MINUTES-STAND UP FOR INDIA.

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

Desh ka salaam to the Nation) was a multimedia presentation

ful rendition of the Indian National Anthem as never before’ (http://

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

sequences of the anthem in medium-to-close shot. This part of the clip is

The national anthem of any country, like its flag, is an index of

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015

Downloaded from cis.sagepub.com at DEAKIN UNIV LIBRARY on May 9, 2015