Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W. Rankin's Theory-1850) - Brittle Material

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W.
Rankin’s Theory- 1850) – Brittle Material

The maximum principal stress criterion:
• Rankin stated max principal stress theory as follows- a material fails by fracturing when the largest
principal stress exceeds the ultimate strength σu in a simple tension test. That is, at the onset of facture,
|σ1| = σu OR |σ3| = σu
• Crack will start at the most highly stressed point in a brittle material when the largest
Principal stress at that point reaches σu
• Criterion has good experimental verification, even though it assumes ultimate strength is
same in compression and tension
Failure surface according to maximum principal stress theory
• This theory of yielding has very poor agreement with experiment. However, the theory has been used
successfully for brittle materials.
• Used to describe fracture of brittle materials such as cast iron
• Limitations
o Doesn’t distinguish between tension or compression
o Doesn’t depend on orientation of principal planes so only applicable to isotropic materials
• Generalization to 3-D stress case is easy:
Maximum Shear Stress or Stress difference theory (Guest’s or Tresca’s Theory-1868)- Ductile Material
The Tresca Criterion:
• Also known as the Maximum Shear Stress criterion.
• Yielding will occur when the maximum shear stress reaches that which caused yielding in a simple
tension test.
• Recall that yielding of a material occurred by slippage between planes oriented at 45° to principal
stresses. This should indicate to you that yielding of a material depends on the maximum shear stress in
the material rather than the maximum normal stress.
If σ1 > σ 2 > σ3 Then σ 1 − σ 3 = σ y
• Failure by slip (yielding) occurs when the maximum shearing stress, τmax exceeds the yield stress τf as
determined in a uniaxial tension test.
• This theory gives satisfactory result for ductile material.
Failure surface according to maximum shear stress theory
Strain Energy Theory (Haigh’s Theory)
This theory is based on the assumption that strains are recoverable up to the elastic limit, and the energy
absorbed by the material at failure up to this point is a single valued function independent of the stress system
causing it. The strain energy per unit volume causing failure is equal to the strain energy at the elastic limit in
simple tension.
Shear Strain Energy Theory (Distortion Energy Theory or Mises-Henky Theory or Von-Misses
Theory)-Ductile Material
• Also known as the Maximum Energy of Distortion criterion
 Based on a more complex view of the role of the principal stress
differences.
• In simple terms, the Von-Mises criterion considers the diameters of all three Mohr’s circles as
contributing to the characterization of yield onset in isotropic materials.
• When the criterion is applied, its relationship to the uniaxial tensile yield strength is:
• F or a state of plane stress ( σ3 =0)

σ12 − σ 1σ 2 + σ 22 = σ y2
• It gives very good result in ductile material.

Maximum Principal Strain Theory (St. Venant Theory)
According to this theory, yielding will occur when the maximum principal strain just exceeds the strain at the
tensile yield point in either simple tension or compression. If ε1 and ε2 are maximum and mini mum principal
strains corresponding to σ1 and σ2, in the limiting case
Mohr’s theory- Brittle Material

Mohr’s Theory
• Mohr’s theory is used to predict the fracture of a material having different properties in
tension and compression. Criterion makes use of Mohr’s circle
• In Mohr’s circle, we note that τ depends on σ, or τ = f(σ). Note the vertical line PC
Represents states of stress on planes with same σ but differing τ, which means the weakest plane is the
one with maxim um τ , point P.
• Points on the outer circle are the weakest planes. On these planes the maximum and minimum principal
stresses are sufficient to decide whether or not failure will occur.
• Experiments are done on a given material to determine the states of stress that result in failure. Each
state defines a Mohr’s circle. If the data are obtained from simple tension, simple compression, and
pure shear, the three resulting circles are adequate to construct an envelope (AB & A’B’)
• Mohr’s envelope thus represents the locus of all possible failure states.
Higher shear stresses are to the left of origin, since most brittle materials have higher strength in compression
Comparison
A comparison among the different failure theories can be made by superposing the yield surfaces as shown in
figure

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W. Rankin's Theory-1850) - Brittle Material

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W. Rankin's Theory-1850) - Brittle Material

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W. Rankin's Theory-1850) - Brittle Material

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W.

Rankin’s Theory- 1850) – Brittle Material

Failure surface according to maximum principal stress theory

Failure surface according to maximum shear stress theory

Strain Energy Theory (Haigh’s Theory)

• F or a state of plane stress ( σ3 =0)

• It gives very good result in ductile material.

Mohr’s theory- Brittle Material

You might also like