Notes, If Any: Notes Lang No Need To Write

TITLE: DR. EMIGDIO A. BONDOC, petitioner, vs. REPRESENTATIVES MARCIANO M.
PINEDA,
MAGDALENO M. PALACOL, COL. JUANITO G. CAMASURA, JR., or any other representative who may be
appointed vice representative Juanito G. Camasura, Jr., and THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, respondents.
G.R. NO. 97710 DATE: September 26, 1991
PONENTE: GRIÑO-AQUINO, J TOPIC: INDEPENDENCE
FACTS OF THE CASE:
In the elections held on May 11, 1987, Marciano Pineda of the Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino (LDP)
and Emigdio Bondoc of the Nacionalista Party (NP) were candidates for the position of Representative for the
Fourth District of Pampanga. Pineda was proclaimed winner. Bondoc filed a protest in the House of
Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET), which is composed of 9 members, 3 of whom are Justices of the SC
and the remaining 6 are members of the House of Representatives (5 members belong to the LDP and 1 member
is from the NP). Thereafter, a decision had been reached in which Bondoc won over Pineda. Congressman
Camasura of the LDP voted with the SC Justices and Congressman Cerilles of the NP to proclaim Bondoc the
winner of the contest.
On the eve of the promulgation of the Bondoc decision, Congressman Camasura received a letter
informing him that he was already expelled from the LDP for allegedly helping to organize the Partido Pilipino of
Eduardo Cojuangco and for allegedly inviting LDP members in Davao Del Sur to join said political party. On the
day of the promulgation of the decision, the Chairman of HRET received a letter informing the Tribunal that on the
basis of the letter from the LDP, the House of Representatives decided to withdraw the nomination and rescind
the election of Congressman Camasura to the HRET.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE/S:
Whether or not the House of Representatives is empowered by the Constitution to interfere with the disposition
of an election contest in the House Electoral Tribunal on the representation in the tribunal of the majority party.
HOLDING
NO. The Court held that the purpose of the constitutional convention creating the Electoral Commission was to
provide an independent and impartial tribunal for the determination of contests to legislative office, devoid of
partisan consideration, and to transfer to that tribunal all the powers previously exercised by the legislature in
matters pertaining to contested elections of its members.
The power granted to the electoral Commission to judge contests relating to the election and qualification of
members of the National Assembly is intended to be as complete and unimpaired as if it had remained in the
legislature. As judges, the members of the tribunal must be non-partisan, expelling Congressman Camasura
from the HRET for having cast a “conscience vote” in favor of Bondoc, based strictly on the result of the
examination and appreciation of the ballots and the recount of the votes by the tribunal, the House of
Representatives committed a grave abuse of discretion, an injustice and a violation of the Constitution.
Sec. 17, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, dictates that the Senate and the House of Representatives shall each
have an Electoral Tribunal which shall be the “sole” judge of all contests relating to the election, returns and
qualifications of their respective members, the Court also held that the HRET is a non-political body, the use of
the word "sole" in both Section 17 of the 1987 Constitution and Section 11 of the 1935 Constitution underscores
the exclusive jurisdiction of the House Electoral Tribunal as judge of contests relating to the election, returns and
qualifications of the members of the House of Representatives (Robles vs. House of Representatives Electoral
Tribunal, G.R. No. 86647, February 5, 1990). The tribunal was created to function as a nonpartisan court
although two-thirds of its members are politicians. It is a non-political body in a sea of politicians. What this Court
had earlier said about the Electoral Commission applies as well to the electoral tribunals of the Senate and House
of Representatives. Hence, the Court declared the decision of the House of Representatives withdrawing the
nomination and rescinding the election of Congressman Juanito G. Camasura, Jr. as a member of the House
Electoral Tribunal is hereby declared null and void abinitio for being violative of the Constitution.
notes, if any: NOTES LANG NO NEED TO WRITE

BADILLA

Notes, If Any: Notes Lang No Need To Write

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes, If Any: Notes Lang No Need To Write

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes, If Any: Notes Lang No Need To Write

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TITLE: DR. EMIGDIO A. BONDOC, petitioner, vs. REPRESENTATIVES MARCIANO M.

notes, if any: NOTES LANG NO NEED TO WRITE

You might also like