Simulation of The Active Brownian Motion of A Microswimmer: 130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
Simulation of The Active Brownian Motion of A Microswimmer: 130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
Simulation of The Active Brownian Motion of A Microswimmer: 130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
Simulation of the active Brownian motion of a microswimmer
Giorgio Volpe and Sylvain Gigan
Institut Langevin, ESPCI ParisTech, CNRS UMR7587, 1 rue Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
Giovanni Volpea)
Physics Department, Bilkent University, Cankaya, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
(Received 19 December 2013; accepted 24 March 2014)
Unlike passive Brownian particles, active Brownian particles, also known as microswimmers,
propel themselves with directed motion and thus drive themselves out of equilibrium.
Understanding their motion can provide insight into out-of-equilibrium phenomena associated with
biological examples such as bacteria, as well as with artificial microswimmers. We discuss how to
mathematically model their motion using a set of stochastic differential equations and how to
numerically simulate it using the corresponding set of finite difference equations both in
homogenous and complex environments. In particular, we show how active Brownian particles do
not follow the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution—a clear signature of their out-of-equilibrium
nature—and how, unlike passive Brownian particles, microswimmers can be funneled, trapped,
and sorted. VC 2014 American Association of Physics Teachers.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4870398]
659 Am. J. Phys. 82 (7), July 2014 http://aapt.org/ajp C 2014 American Association of Physics Teachers
V 659
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
d pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi be obtained from Eqs. (3)–(5) by carrying out the
uðtÞ ¼ X þ 2DR Wu ; (3)
dt substitutions
d pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi uðtÞ ! ui ; xðtÞ ! xi ; yðtÞ ! yi ; (6)
xðtÞ ¼ v cos uðtÞ þ 2DT Wx ; (4)
dt
d u ui1 d xi xi1
d pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi uðtÞ ! i ; xðtÞ ! ;
yðtÞ ¼ v sin uðtÞ þ 2DT Wy ; (5) dt Dt dt Dt
dt d yi yi1
yðtÞ ! ; (7)
where Wu , Wx, and Wy represent independent white noise dt Dt
processes. Inertial effects are neglected because typically wu;i wx;i wy;i
Wu ! pffiffiffiffiffi ; Wx ! pffiffiffiffiffi ; Wy ! pffiffiffiffiffi : (8)
microscopic active particles move in a low Reynolds number Dt Dt Dt
regime.29 In the following, we will always consider a particle
with radius R ¼ 1 lm at temperature T ¼ 300 K immersed in Here wu;i , wx;i , and wy;i are uncorrelated sequences of ran-
a liquid with viscosity g ¼ 0:001 N s=m2 (such as water); dom numbers taken from a Gaussian distribution with zero
the corresponding translational diffusion coefficient is mean and standard deviation 1. Many programming lan-
DT 0:22 lm2 =s and the corresponding rotational diffusion guages have built-in functions that directly generate such
coefficient is DR 0:16 rad2 =s. random sequences. Alternatively, it is possible to generate
Gaussian random numbers from uniform random numbers
between 0 and 1 using various techniques such as the Box-
III. FINITE DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS M€uller algorithm or the Marsaglia polar algorithm.31 The
numerical solution is then obtained by solving the resulting
The continuous-time solution ½uðtÞ; xðtÞ; yðtÞ to the set finite difference equation recursively for ½ui ; xi ; yi using
of stochastic differential equations given by Eqs. (3)–(5) the values ½ui1 ; xi1 ; yi1 obtained from the previous
can be approximated by a discrete-time sequence ½ui ; xi ; yi iteration:
½uðti Þ; xðti Þ; yðti Þ that is the solution of the corresponding pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
set of finite difference equations evaluated at regular time ui ¼ ui1 þ XDt þ 2DR Dt wu;i ; (9)
steps ti ¼ iDt, where Dt is a sufficiently small time step. In pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
order to derive the set of finite difference equations, the xi ¼ xi1 þ v cos ui1 Dt þ 2DT Dt wx;i ; (10)
white noise factors in Eqs. (3)–(5) must be dealt with care- pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
fully, for example, by following the procedure described in yi ¼ yi1 þ v sin ui1 Dt þ 2DT Dt wy;i : (11)
Ref. 30. Explicitly, the set of finite difference equations can
We note that this is a first-order integration method that gen-
eralizes the Euler method to stochastic differential equations;
higher-order algorithms can also be employed to obtain
faster convergence of the solution.31
660 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 82, No. 7, July 2014 Volpe, Gigan, and Volpe 660
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
For ballistic motion MSDðsÞ is proportional to s2 while for
diffusive motion it is proportional to s. As can be seen in
Fig. 2(a), when v 6¼ 0 the MSDðsÞ deviates from a diffusive
behavior on short time scales and exhibits an enhanced effec-
tive diffusion over long time scales.
The theoretical value of MSDðsÞ is given by the
formula12,32
v2 s2R ½ 2s=sR
MSDðsÞ ¼ 4DT þ v2 sR s þ e 1; (14) Fig. 3. Implementation of reflective boundary conditions. At each time step,
2 the algorithm (a) checks whether a particle has moved inside an obstacle; if
so: (b) the boundary of the obstacle is approximated by its tangent l at the
which is essentially the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck formula for the point p where the particle entered the obstacle, and (c) the particle position
MSD of a Brownian particle with inertia,33 describing the is reflected on this line.
transition from the ballistic regime to the diffusive regime
although at a much shorter time scale than for active V. COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS
particles.30 From Eq. (14), we find that for s sR the effec-
tive particle diffusion is Deff ¼ DT þ v2 sR =4, and for s sR A. Reflective boundaries
the particle motion is ballistic with MSDðsÞ / v2 s2 . The So far we have considered particles that move only in a
theoretical MSDðsÞ calculated using Eq. (14) is shown as the homogeneous environment. However, self-propelled par-
solid lines in Fig. 2(b). While the features of the MSD of a ticles often move in patterned environments, e.g., inside the
microswimmer are well captured by Eq. (14), there can be intestinal tract, which provides the natural habitat of E. coli,5
deviations due to the microscopic dynamics of the or through porous polluted soils, where chemotactic bacteria
microswimmer.12 spread during bioremediation.7 In a similar fashion, artificial
We now consider the case of chiral active Brownian par- microswimmers must also reliably perform their tasks in
ticles. There are many natural examples of chiral micro- complex surroundings, e.g., inside lab-on-a-chip devices or
swimmers. For example, E. coli bacteria and spermatozoa in living organisms.38 When self-propelled particles move
undergo helicoidal motion, which becomes two-dimensional through a patterned environment, frequent encounters with
chiral active Brownian motion when moving near obstacles will occur. Whenever an active particle contacts an
boundaries.34–37 Figure 1(g) shows the simulated trajectory obstacle, it slides along the obstacle until its orientation
of a chiral particle with X ¼ þ3:14 rad=s and v ¼ 31 lm=s; points away from it. Numerically, this process can be mod-
it bends clockwise, tracking almost circular trajectories that eled using reflective boundaries, as shown in Fig. 3.
are modified by Brownian fluctuations. Changing the chiral- The concrete implementation of the reflective boundary
ity sign (X ¼ 3:14 rad=s) results in similar trajectories that condition is realized by updating at each time step the parti-
bend counterclockwise [Fig. 1(h)]. cle position from ri1 ¼ ½xi1 ; yi1 to ri ¼ ½xi ; yi according
to the following algorithm:
1. tentatively update the particle position to r~i ¼ ½x~i ; y~i
according to Eqs. (9)–(11);
2. if ~r i is not inside any obstacle, set ri ¼ ~r i and move on to
the next time step;
3. otherwise, if ~r i is inside some obstacle, as depicted in
Fig. 3(a):
Fig. 2. (Color online) (a) Numerically calculated and (b) theoretical mean Fig. 4. (Color online) Trajectories over a 10-s time period of Brownian
square displacement for active Brownian particles with self-propulsion particles moving within a circular pore (diameter 40 lm) with reflective
velocity v ¼ 0 (circles), v ¼ 1 lm=s (triangles), v ¼ 2 lm=s (squares), and boundaries at self-propulsion velocity (a) v ¼ 0, (b) v ¼ 5 lm=s, and
v ¼ 3 lm=s (diamonds); in all cases, X ¼ 0. For passive Brownian particles (c) v ¼ 10 lm=s, all for X ¼ 0. The histograms on the bottom show the
(v ¼ 0) the motion is always diffusive (MSDðsÞ / s), while for active probability distribution along a diameter of the circular pore. While the
Brownian particles the motion is ballistic on short time scales probability is uniform across the whole pore for passive Brownian particles,
(MSDðsÞ / s2 for s sR ) and then becomes diffusive on long time scales the probability increases towards the walls for active Brownian particles as v
(MSDðsÞ / s for s sR ) with an enhanced diffusion constant. increases.
661 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 82, No. 7, July 2014 Volpe, Gigan, and Volpe 661
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
Fig. 5. (Color online) Rectification of active Brownian motion in an asymmetric ratchet-like microchannel. A segment of the channel, whose dent is 10-lm
long, is represented by the grey structure in the inset of (a); the walls of the channel are infinitely extended. The distributions of passive (black histograms) and
active (gray/colored histograms) Brownian particles released at time t ¼ 0 from position x ¼ 0 are plotted at times (a) t ¼ 100 s, (b) t ¼ 500 s and
(c) t ¼ 1000 s. The x-axis gives the distance from the fixed, constant starting position of the particles. The higher the self-propulsion velocity, the farther the
active particles travel along the channel. Each histogram is calculated using 1000 particle trajectories.
(a) calculate the intersection point p ¼ ½xp ; yp between Brownian particles (v ¼ 0), which are seen to explore the
the boundary and the line from ri1 to ~r i ; configuration space within the pore uniformly. By contrast,
(b) calculate the straight line l tangent to the obstacle at p active Brownian particles, shown in Figs. 4(b) (v ¼ 5 lm=s)
with tangent unit vector ^t and normal unit vector n ^ and 4(c) (v ¼ 10 lm=s), tend to spend more time at the pore
(outgoing from the obstacle), as shown in Fig. 3(b); boundaries. When a microswimmer encounters a boundary,
(c) calculate ri by reflecting ~r i on l so that it keeps on pushing against the boundary and diffusing along
the cavity perimeter until the rotational diffusion orients the
ri ¼ ~ ^ n
r i 2½ð~r i pÞ n ^; (15) propulsion of the particle towards the interior of the pore.
The chance that the active particle encounters the pore
where ð~ ^ is the distance between ~r i and l.
r i pÞ n boundary in one of its straight runs increases as its velocity
The crucial prerequisite for this numerical approach to work increases. These observations can be made more quantitative
is that the average spatial increment of a simulated trajectory by using the particle probability distribution. The histograms
is small compared to the characteristic length scale of the at the bottom of Fig. 4 each show a section of this probability
obstacles. This condition permits one to consider only one distribution along a diameter of the pore. We see that the
boundary at a time and also to approximate the boundary with probability of finding the particle at the boundaries increases
its tangent straight line. If the time step Dt is too large, this with the particle’s self-propulsion velocity.
approach can lead to some numerical instability around sharp That active Brownian particles tend to accumulate at the
corners in the boundaries, where multiple reflections may take boundaries of a pore is a sign of the fact that active particles
place, or on an obstacle wall that is too thin, where the par- are out of equilibrium. For a passive Brownian particle in
ticle’s trajectory could unnaturally pass through the obstacle. thermal equilibrium with its environment, the probability of
finding the particle at a given position in the pore pðx; yÞ is
connected to the Boltzmann potential Vðx; yÞ by the
B. Non-Boltzmann probability distribution in a pore Maxwell-Boltzmann relation pðx; yÞ / exp½Vðx; yÞ=ðkB TÞ.
In the case presented in Fig. 4, there are no external forces
As a first example of a complex environment, we consider acting on the particle and, therefore, Vðx; yÞ and the corre-
a microswimmer confined within a circular pore, as shown in sponding Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution are constant, as
Fig. 4. Figure 4(a) shows four 10-s trajectories of passive seen in Fig. 4(a). However, the fact that the distributions in
Fig. 6. Segregation of active particles (v ¼ 10 lm=s) using a series of wedges (dark structures), whose walls are 2 lm thick. (a) At t ¼ 0, the active particles
(black dots) are uniformly distributed across the square; (b) at t ¼ 100 s, most of the active particles have concentrated to the right of the wedges.
(c) Percentage of the total particles on the right of the wedges (dots) as a function of time; the percentage stabilizes at around 80% (black dashed line) after the
first 100 s.
662 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 82, No. 7, July 2014 Volpe, Gigan, and Volpe 662
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
Fig. 7. (Color online) Sorting of chiral microswimmers (v ¼ 31 lm=s and X ¼ 63:14 rad=s) with chiral “flowers” (gray rectangles, thickness 2 lm). (a) At
t ¼ 0 a balanced mixture of active particles with opposite chiralities is released inside two chiral flowers with opposite chirality. As time progresses, shown in
(b) and (c), the active particles rotating counterclockwise (darker squares) are trapped in the left chiral flower, while the particles rotating clockwise (lighter
circles) are trapped in the right chiral flower.
Figs. 4(b) and 4(c) are not constant, despite the constant chiral propellers, sorting the resulting chiral microswimmers,
potentials, is a clear deviation from the Maxwell-Boltzmann and finally detaching the propellers. Such techniques could
distribution, thus indicating the out-of-equilibrium nature of be applied in the biochemical and pharmaceutical industry
active Brownian particles. where often only one specific chirality is desired.42 Figure 7
shows a possible approach to sorting active particles based
C. Motion rectification in a microchannel on the sign of their motion chirality in the presence of some
chiral patterns in the environment, such as an arrangement of
The motion of active particles can be rectified by a pat- tilted rectangles along a circle forming a chiral “flower.” We
terned microchannel. For example, the inset of Fig. 5(a) use two of these flowers with opposite chiralities enclosed in
shows an example of such a microchannel, decorated with a a 100-lm-side box where the particles can move freely.
series of asymmetric dents on both its walls. A group of pas- We start at time t ¼ 0 with a balanced mixture of active par-
sive Brownian particles released at time t ¼ 0 from position ticles with opposite chiralities placed inside each flower
x ¼ 0 diffuses symmetrically around the initial position [Fig. 7(a)]. As time passes, most of the microswimmers
(black histograms in Fig. 5). By contrast, a group of active rotating counterclockwise (clockwise) escape the right (left)
Brownian particles is funneled by the channel in such a way chiral flower, while those with the opposite chirality remain
that an average directed motion is imposed on the particles, trapped. At t ¼ 1 000 s most of the microswimmers are sta-
as can be seen in the colored histograms in Fig. 5. The recti- bly trapped, as shown in Fig. 7(c).
fication is more pronounced when the self-propulsion velo-
city is higher. This and similar effects have been proposed
VI. FURTHER NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS
to sort microswimmers on the basis of their velocity,26 to
trap microswimmers in moving edges,39 and to deliver mi- The approach described in this article can be generalized
croscopic cargoes to a given location.19 to more complex situations. In particular, it is interesting to
consider the case of an active spherical particle moving in
D. Trapping by asymmetric barriers three dimensions, where the particle position is described by
three coordinates and its orientation by two angles.43
Because active particles are not in thermal equilibrium with Another interesting generalization is to non-spherical active
their environment, it is possible to use the features of the envi- particles; for example, rods are a more accurate model for
ronment to perform complex tasks on active particles such as bacteria. This generalization requires the use of diffusion
separating, trapping, or sorting them on the basis of their swim- matrices instead of diffusion coefficients, as described in
ming properties. For example, Fig. 6 shows the segregation of Ref. 44. Finally, it is also interesting to consider the case of
active particles within a 100-lm-side square box divided into multiple particles interacting with each other, for example,
two parts by a series of wedges; this situation was first pro- by Yukawa or Lennard-Jones potentials. This can be imple-
posed in Ref. 40. At t ¼ 0, the active particles are homogene- mented using molecular dynamics algorithms.45
ously distributed in the box [Fig. 6(a)], while after 100 s most
of the active particles concentrate in the right portion of the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
box [Fig. 6(b)]. The selectivity of this process depends on the
system parameters, such as the size and shape of the wedges This work was partially funded by the European Research
and the drift velocity of the microswimmers.39,40 Figure 6(c) Council (Grant No. 278025), by the Scientific and
shows the percentage of active particles in the right portion of Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
the box as a function of time; with our system parameters, the under Grant Nos. 112T235 and 113Z556, COST Actions
distribution quickly approaches a plateau of around 80%. MP1205 and IC1208, and Marie Curie Career Integration
Grant (MC-CIG) under Grant No. PCIG11 GA-2012-321726.
E. Chiral particle separation
a)
Electronic mail: giovanni.volpe@fen.bilkent.edu.tr
Active particles can also be separated on the basis of 1
S. J. Ebbens and J. R. Howse, “In pursuit of propulsion at the nanoscale,”
their chirality.26,41 This is a particularly interesting option Soft Matter 6, 726–738 (2010).
because it may provide a better technique to separate mole- 2
W. C. K. Poon, “From Clarkia to Escherichia and Janus: The physics of
cules with opposite chirality by chemically coupling them to natural and synthetic active colloids,” e-print arXiv:1306.4799 (2013).
663 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 82, No. 7, July 2014 Volpe, Gigan, and Volpe 663
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40
3 24
U. Erdmann, W. Ebeling, L. Schimansky-Geier, and F. Schweitzer, GNU Octave software, <www.gnu.org/software/octave/>.
25
“Brownian particles far from equilibrium,” Eur. Phys. J. B: Condens. S. van Teeffelen and H. L€ owen, “Dynamics of a Brownian circle
Matt. Comp. Sys. 15, 105–113 (2000). swimmer,” Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101-1–4 (2008).
4 26
P. H€anggi and F. Marchesoni, “Artificial Brownian motors: Controlling M. Mijalkov and G. Volpe, “Sorting of chiral microswimmers,” Soft
transport on the nanoscale,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387–442 (2009). Matter 9, 6376–6381 (2013).
5 27
H. C. Berg, E. coli in Motion (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004). F. K€ummel, B. Ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G.
6
D. B. Weibel, P. Garstecki, D. Ryan, W. R. DiLuzio, M. Mayer, J. E. Seto, Volpe, H. L€ owen, and C. Bechinger, “Circular motion of asymmetric self-
and G. M. Whitesides, “Microoxen: Microorganisms to move microscale propelling particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302-1–5 (2013).
28
loads,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 11963–11967 (2005). W. T. Coffey, Yu. P. Kalmykov, and J. T. Waldron, The Langevin
7
R. M. Ford and R. W. Harvey, “Role of chemotaxis in the transport of bac- Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics,
teria through saturated porous media,” Adv. Water Res. 30, 1608–1617 Chemistry, and Electrical Engineering (World Scientific, New York,
(2007). 2004).
8 29
W. Yang, V. R. Misko, K. Nelissen, M. Kong, and F. M. Peeters, “Using E. M. Purcell, “Life at low Reynolds number,” Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11
self-driven microswimmers for particle separation,” Soft Matter 8, (1977).
30
5175–5179 (2012). G. Volpe and G. Volpe, “Simulation of a Brownian particle in an optical
9
R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, “Propulsion of a molecular trap,” Am. J. Phys. 81, 224–230 (2013).
31
machine by asymmetric distribution of reaction products,” Phys. Rev. P. E. Kloeden and R. A. Pearson, Numerical Solution of Stochastic
Lett. 94, 220801-1–4 (2005). Differential Equations (Springer, Heidelberg, 1999).
10 32
W. F. Paxton, A. Sen, and T. E. Mallouk, “Motility of catalytic nanopar- K. Franke and H. Gruler, “Galvanotaxis of human granulocytes: Electric
ticles through self-generated forces,” Chem. Eur. J. 11, 6462–6470 (2005). field jump studies,” Eur. Biophys. J. 18, 334–346 (1990).
11 33
R. Dreyfus, J. Baudry, M. L. Roper, M. Fermigier, H. A. Stone, and J. G. E. Uhlenbeck and L. S. Ornstein, “On the theory of the Brownian
Bibette, “Microscopic artificial swimmers,” Nature 437, 862–865 (2005). motion,” Phys. Rev. 36, 823–841 (1930).
12 34
J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. E. Lauga, W. R. DiLuzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone, “Swimming
Golestanian, “Self-motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to in circles: Motion of bacteria near solid boundaries,” Biophys. J. 90,
random walk,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048102-1–4 (2007). 400–412 (2006).
13 35
P. Tierno, R. Golestanian, I. Pagonabarraga, and F. Sagues, “Magnetically B. M. Friedrich and F. J€ ulicher, “Steering chiral swimmers along noisy
actuated colloidal microswimmers,” J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 16525–16528 helical paths,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 068102-1–4 (2009).
36
(2008). R. Di Leonardo, D. Dell’Arciprete, L. Angelani, and V. Iebba,
14
J. Palacci, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, “Sedimentation “Swimming with an image,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 038101-1–4 (2011).
37
and effective temperature of active colloidal suspensions,” Phys. Rev. Ting -Wei Su, Liang Xue, and Aydogan Ozcan, “High-throughput lensfree
Lett. 105, 088304-1–4 (2010). 3D tracking of human sperms reveals rare statistics of helical trajectories,”
15
M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, M. Tasinkevych, and J. Ralston, “Phoretic Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 16018–16022 (2012).
38
motion of spheroidal particles due to self-generated solute gradients,” Eur. C. D. Chin, V. Linder, and S. K. Sia, “Lab-on-a-chip devices for global
Phys. J. E 31, 351–367 (2010). health: Past studies and future opportunities,” Lab Chip 7, 41–57 (2007).
16 39
G. Volpe, I. Buttinoni, D. Vogt, H.-J. K€ ummerer, and C. Bechinger, A. Kaiser, K. Popowa, H. H. Wensink, and H. L€ owen, “Capturing self-
“Microswimmers in patterned environments,” Soft Matter 7, 8810–8815 propelled particles in a moving microwedge,” Phys. Rev. E 88, 022311-
(2011). 1–9 (2013).
17 40
A. Buzas, L. Kelemen, A. Mathesz, L. Oroszi, G. Vizsnyiczai, T. Vicsek, M. B. Wan, C. J. O. Reichhardt, Z. Nussinov, and C. Reichhardt,
and P. Ormos, “Light sailboats: Laser driven autonomous microrobots,” “Rectification of swimming bacteria and self-driven particle systems by
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 041111-1–3 (2012). arrays of asymmetric barriers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 018102-1–4 (2008).
18 41
I. Buttinoni, G. Volpe, F. K€ ummel, G. Volpe, and C. Bechinger, “Active C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, “Dynamics and separation of circu-
Brownian motion tunable by light,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 284129- larly moving particles in asymmetrically patterned arrays,” Phys. Rev. E
1–6 (2012). 88, 042306-1–10 (2013).
19 42
N. Koumakis, A. Lepore, C. Maggi, and R. Di Leonardo, “Targeted deliv- S. Ahuja, editor, Chiral Separation Methods for Pharmaceutical and
ery of colloids by swimming bacteria,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2588-1–6 (2013). Biotechnological Products (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ,
20
D. Babič, C. Schmitt, and C. Bechinger, “Colloids as model systems for 2011).
43
problems in statistical physics,” Chaos 15, 026114-1–6 (2005). T. Carlsson, T. Ekholm, and C. Elvingson, “Algorithm for generating a
21
F. Schweitzer, Brownian Agents and Active Particles: Collective Brownian motion on a sphere,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 505001-1–10
Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences (Springer, Heidelberg, (2010).
44
2007). M. X. Fernandes and J. Garcıa de la Torre, “Brownian dynamics simula-
22
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4870398 for tion of rigid particles of arbitrary shape in external fields,” Biophys. J. 83,
the Matlab codes. 3039–3048 (2002).
23 45
Scilab, open source software for numerical computation, D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From
<www.scilab.org/>. Algorithms to Applications (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001).
664 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 82, No. 7, July 2014 Volpe, Gigan, and Volpe 664
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.64.11.153 On: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:23:40