US Vs Liberato Exaltacion Et Al, 3 Phil 339, PG.R. No. 1481

9/5/2020 G.R. No.
1481
Today is Saturday, September 05, 2020
Constitution Statutes Executive Issuances Judicial Issuances Other Issuances Jurisprudence International Legal Resources AUSL Exclusive
Republic of the Philippines

SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. 1481 February 17, 1904
THE UNITED STATES, complainant-appellee,

vs.
LIBERATO EXALTACION, ET AL., defendants-appellants.
Alberto Barretto for appellants.

Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.
TORRES, J.:
March 26, 1903, the provincial fiscal of Bulacan presented to the court of that province an information charging
Liberato Exaltacion and Buenaventura Tanchinco with the crime of rebellion, in that they, subsequently to the 4th
day of November, 1901, willfully and illegally bound themselves to take part in a rebellion against the Government of
the United States in these Islands, swearing allegiance to the Katipunan Society, the purpose of which was to
overthrow the said Government by force of arms, this against the statute in the case made and provided.
In the course of the trial Don Pablo Tecson, the provincial governor of Bulacan, testified under oath that the two
defendants were arrested in the month of March, 1903, the police some days before having captured a number of
documents in the encampment of one Contreras, as so-called general of bandits, situated at a place called Langca,
of the town of Meycauayan, among which documents appeared the papers now on pages 2 and 3 of the record,
signed by the said Exaltacion and Tanchinco, who recognized the said documents when they were exhibited to
them; that the said defendants stated to the witness that they had signed the said documents under compulsion;
that the purpose of the Katipunan Society was to obtain the independence of the Philippines; that this statement was
made in the house of the parish priest of Meycauayan in the presence of Exequiel Casas and Fernando Nieto. The
latter, upon their examination as witnesses, testified to the same facts, stating that the defendants told Governor
Tecson that they had signed the said documents under fear of death at the hands of the thieves by whom they had
been captured. The witness Casas, the municipal president of Meycauayan, testified that he held office as such in
place of the former president, Don Tomas Testa, who was kidnapped in the month of October, 1902.
The said documents, the first of which was dated July 4 and the second July 17, 1902, were written in Tagalog, and
contain an oath taken in the name of God, and a covenant on the part of the subscribers to carry out the superior
orders of the Katipunan, and never disobey them until their death in the defense of the mother country. The two
accused, under oath, testified to having signed the said documents and alleged that they did so under compulsion
and force while they were held as captives by the thieves; that the defendant Tanchinco was captured in the fields
one day when he was going to work on his farm by three armed men, unknown to him, who asked him if he was an
agent or friend of President Testa, and upon his replying in the negative they compelled him in view of his denial to
sign a document, now on page 3 of the record.
The defendant Tanchinco cited Lazaro Yusay to testify to the fact that he was captured at a place called Kaibiga in
the township of Novaliches, and that on the day following his release, having been unable to pay the $300 which
was demanded of him, he reported to the president, Tomas Testa. The defendant Liberato Exaltacion under oath
testified that he was captured near Meycauayan by five persons, unknown, dressed as policemen and armed with
guns or revolvers; that these men bound him and took him into the forest and there compelled him by threats of
death to sign the documents now on page 2 of the record; that thereupon they allowed him to go upon promise to
return. This defendant testified that Antero Villano and Tomas Rivera saw him while on the road in the hands of the
thieves. Both the accused testified that as soon as they were released they presented themselves to the president,
Don Tomas Testa, in the presence of witnesses, and subsequently went to Bonifacio Morales, a lieutenant of
volunteers, and reported to him the fact that they had been captured.
The witnesses Morales, Lazaro Yusay, Antero Villano, Dalmacio Ferrer, and Hipolito de Leon — of whom the last
two were present when Tanchinco appeared before Senor Testa, the president of Meycauayan, and reported to him
https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1904/feb1904/gr_1481_1904.html 1/2
9/5/2020 G.R. No. 1481
what had happened to him — all testified to the same fact and corroborated the statements of the accused with
respect to their capture and their subsequent report to President Testa and to the witness Morales.
The evidence for the prosecution, and especially the two documents above referred to, signed by the accused, is
not sufficient to prove the guilt of the latter or to justify the imposition upon them of the penalty inflicted by the
judgment of the court below.
The facts, established by the evidence, that the defendants were kidnapped by brigands who belonged to the
Contreras band, and that they signed the said documents under compulsion and while in captivity, relieve them from
all criminal liability from the crime of rebellion of which they are charged. The conduct of the defendants in
presenting themselves first to the local president of Meycauayan and subsequently to Lieut. Bonifacio Morales, of
the Bulacan Government Volunteers, as soon as they were released by the bandits is corroborative of their
testimony, and is the best demonstration of their innocence. This conclusion is not overcome by the trifling
discrepancy between the testimony of the witness Yusay and that of the defendant Tanchinco nor the fact the
Exaltacion was unable to determine the date when he was captured or that on which he appeared before President
Testa.
The guilt of the defendants of the crime defined and punished by Act No. 292 not having been established at the trial
beyond a reasonable doubt, we are of the opinion that the judgment below must be reversed and the defendants
acquitted with the costs de oficio. The judge below will be informed of this decision and a copy of the judgment
entered herein will be furnished him for his information and guidance. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Cooper, Willard, Mapa, McDonough and Johnson, JJ., concur.
The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation
https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1904/feb1904/gr_1481_1904.html 2/2

US Vs Liberato Exaltacion Et Al, 3 Phil 339, PG.R. No. 1481

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

US Vs Liberato Exaltacion Et Al, 3 Phil 339, PG.R. No. 1481

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

US Vs Liberato Exaltacion Et Al, 3 Phil 339, PG.R. No. 1481

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

9/5/2020 G.R. No.

Today is Saturday, September 05, 2020

Republic of the Philippines

G.R. No. 1481 February 17, 1904

THE UNITED STATES, complainant-appellee,

Alberto Barretto for appellants.

You might also like