People v. Perez, 83 Phil. 1

9/17/2020 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 083
[No. L-856. April 18, 1949]

THE PEOPLE OP THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff and appellee, vs.
SUSANO PEREZ (alias KID PEREZ), defendant and appellant.
1.CRIMINAL LAW; TREASON; ADHERENCE TO THE ENEMY, EXTENT AND SCOPE OF.
—In a broad sense, the law of treason does not prescribe all kinds of
social, business and political intercourse between the belligerent
occupants of the invaded country and its inhabitants. In the nature of
things, the occupation of a country by the enemy is bound to create
relations of all sorts between the invaders and the natives. What aid
and comfort constitute treason must depend upon their nature,
degree and purpose. To draw a line between treasonable and
unreasonable assistance is not always easy. The scope of adherence to
the enemy is comprehensive, its requirement indeterminate.
2.ID. ; ID. ; ID.—As a general rule, to be treasonous the extent of the aid
and comfort given to the enemies must be to render assistance to
them as enemies and not merely as individuals and, in addition, be
directly in furtherance of the enemies' hostile designs. To make a
simple distinction: To lend or give money to an enemy as a friend or
out of charity to the beneficiary so that he may buy personal
necessities is to assist him as an individual and is not technically
traitorous. On the other hand, to lend or give him money to enable
him to buy arms or ammunition to use in waging war against the
giver's country enhances his strength and by the same count injures
the interest of the government of the giver. That is treason.
3.ID.; ID.; COMMANDEERING OF WOMEN TO SATISFY THE LUST OF THE ENEMY IS
NOT TREASON.—"Commandeering" of women to satisfy the lust of

Japanese officers or men or to enliven the entertainments held in
their honor was not treason even though the women and the
entertainments helped to make life more pleasant for the enemies
and boost their spirit; he was not guilty any more than the women
themselves would have been if they voluntarily and willingly had
surrendered their bodies or organized the entertainments. Sexual and
social relations with the Japanese did not directly and materially
tend to improve their war efforts or to weaken the power of the
United States. The acts herein charged were not, by fair implication,
calculated to strengthen the Japanese Empire or its army or to
cripple the defense and resistance of the other side. Whatever
favorable effect the defendant's collaboration with the Japanese
might have in their prosecution of the war was trivial, imperceptible,
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001749b4a88dae16747fb003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/12
315
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 315

People vs. Perez
and unintentional. Intent of disloyalty is a vital ingredient in the

crime of treason, which, in the absence of admission, may be gathered
from the nature and circumstances of each particular case.
4.CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE; TREASON; CONVICTION OF ACCUSED FOR CRIME
OF RAPE ALLEGED AND INCLUDED IN THE INFORMATION.—Section 2 of
Commonwealth Act No. 682 requires that the private crimes of which
an accused of treason may be convicted must be averred in the
information and sustained by evidence. In the light of this enactment,
the defendant was warned of the hazard that he might be found
guilty of rapes if he was innocent of treason and thus afforded an
opportunity to prepare and meet them. There is no element of
surprise or anomaly involved. In fact, under the general law of
criminal procedure, conviction for a crime different from that
designated in the complaint or information is allowed and practised,
provided only that such crime "is included or described in the body of
the information, and is afterwards justified by the proof presented
during the trial."
APPEAL from a judgment of the People's Court.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Crispin Oben and Isidro Santiago for appellant.
Assistant Solicitor General Manuel P. Barcelona and
Solicitor Esmeraldo Umali for appellee.
TUASON, J.:
Susano Perez alias Kid Perez was convicted of treason
by the 5th Division of the People's Court sitting in Cebu
City and sentenced to death by electrocution.
Seven counts were alleged in the information but the
prosecution offered evidence only on counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6,
all of which, according to the court, were substantiated. In
a unanimous decision, the trial court found as follows:
"As regards count No. 1—
"Count No. 1 alleges that the accused, together with the other
Filipinos, recruited, apprehended and commandeered numerous
girls and women against their will for the purpose of using them,
as in fact they were used, to satisfy the immoral purpose and
sexual desire of Colonel Mini, and among such unfortunate
victims, were Felina Laput, Eriberta Ramo alias Miami Ramo,
Eduarda Daohog, Eutiquia Lamay, Feliciana Bonalos and
Flaviana Bonalos.
316
316 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

People vs. Perez
"It would be unnecessary to recite here the testimonies of all the

victims of the accused; it is sufficient to reproduce here succinctly the
testimony of Eriberta Ramo. She testified that on June 15, 1942, the
accused came to her house to get her and told her that she was wanted in
the house of her aunt, but instead, she was brought to the house of the
Puppet Governor Agapito Hontañosas; that she escaped and returned to
Baclayon her hometown; that the accused came again and told her that
Colonel Mini wanted her to be his Information Clerk; that she did not
accept the job; that a week later, the accused came to Baclayon to get
her, and succeeded in taking some other girls to Puppet Governor
Agapito Hontañosas; that Governor Hontañosas told her that Colonel
Mini wanted her to be his wife; that when she was brought to Colonel
Mini the latter had nothing on but a 'G’ string; that he, Colonel Mini
threatened her with a sword, tied her to a bed and with force succeeded
in having carnal knowledge with her; that on the following night, again
she was brought to Colonel Mini and again she was raped; that finally
she was able to escape and stayed in hiding for three weeks and only
came out from the hiding when Colonel Mini left Tagbilaran.
"Count No. 2 of the information substantially alleges: That the
accused in company with some Japs and Filipinos took Eriberta Ramo
and her sister Cleopatra Ramo from their home in Baclayon to attend a
banquet and a dance organized in honor of Colonel Mini by the Puppet
Governor, Agapito Hontañosas in order that said Japanese Colonel might
select those girls who would later be taken to satisfy his carnal appetite
and that by means of threat, force and intimidation, the above mentioned
two sisters were brought to the headquarters of the Japanese
Commander at the Mission Hospital in Tagbilaran where Eriberta Ramo
was forced to live a life of shame. All these facts alleged in count No. 2
were testified to by said witnesses Eriberta Ramo and her mother
Mercedes de Ramo. It is not necessary here to recite once more their
testimony in support of the allegations in count No. 2; this Court is fully
convinced that the allegations in said count No. 2 were fully
substantiated by the evidence adduced.
"Count No. 4 substantially alleges that on July 16, 1942, the two girls
named Eduarda S. Daohog and Eutiquia Lamay, were taken from their
homes in Corella, Bohol, by the accused and his companion named
Vicente Bullecer, and delivered to the Japanese Officer, Dr. Takibayas to
satisfy his carnal appetite, but these two, the accused Susano Perez
and his companion Vicente Bullecer, before
317
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 317

People vs. Perez
delivering them to said Japanese Officer, satisfied first their lust; the
accused Susano Perez raping Eduarda S. Daohog, and his companion,
Vicente Bullecer, the other girl Eutiquia Lamay. Eduarda S. Daohog,
testifying, said: that while on the way to Tagbilaran, the accused through
force and intimidation, raped her in an uninhabited house; that she
resisted with all her force against the desire of the accused, but of no
avail; that upon arriving in Tagbilaran, she was delivered to the
Japanese Officer named Takibayas who also raped her. Eutiquia Lamay
testified that on July 16, 1942, the accused and his companion, Bullecer,
went to her house to take her and her sister; that her sister was then out
of the house; that the accused threatened her with a revolver if she
refuses to go; that she was placed in a car where Eduarda Daohog was;
that while they were in the car, the accused carried Eduarda out of the
car, and their companion Bullecer took the other witness (Eutiquia
Lamay); that when the accused and Eduarda returned to the car, the
latter, Eduarda, covered her face, crying; that later, she and Eduarda
were taken to the Governor's house; that on arriving and in the presence
of the Puppet Governor Hontañosas, the Governor exclaimed: 'I did not
call for these girls'; but the accused replied saying: ‘ These girls talked
bad against the Japs, and that is why we arrested them'; that the said
Governor Hontañosas then, said: 'Take them to the Japs'; that the
accused and Bullecer brought the two girls to the Japanese
headquarters; that Eduarda was taken to one room by the Japanese
Captain called Dr. Takibayas, and she (Eutiquia Lamay) was taken to
another room by another Japanese living in that house; that she was
raped by that Jap while in the room; that she resisted all she could, but
of no avail.
"In the light of the testimonies of these two witnesses, Eduarda S.
Daohog and Eutiquia Lamay, all the allegations in Count No. 4 were
fully proven beyond reasonable doubt.
"Count No. 5 alleges: That on or about June 4, 1942, the said accused
commandeered Feliciana Bonalos and her sister Flaviana Bonalos on the
pretext that they were to be taken as witnesses before a Japanese
Colonel in the investigation of a case against a certain Chinese (Insik
Eping), and upon arriving at Tagbilaran, Bohol, the accused brought the
aforesaid two girls to the residence of Colonel Mini, Commander of the
Japanese Armed Forces in Bohol and by means of violence, threat and
intimidation, said Japanese Colonel abused and had sexual intercourse
with Flaviana Bonalos; that the accused subsequently brought Flaviana
Bonalos to a small house near the headquarters of Colonel Mini and
through violence, threat and intimidation, succeeded in having carnal
knowledge with her against
318

People vs. Perez
her will; that about two days, later, upon the pretext of conducting
the unfortunate girls to their home, the said accused brought the other
girl Feliciana Bonalos to a secluded place in Tagbilaran, Bohol, and in
the darkness, by means of threat and violence had carnal knowledge
with her against her will.
"Feliciana Bonalos testifying in this count, declared: that the accused

came to get her on the pretext that she was to be used as witness in a
case affecting certain Chinaman before Colonel Mini; that she and her
younger sister Flaviana were brought in a car driven by the accused; that
they were brought to the house of Colonel Mini; that her sister Flaviana
was conducted into a room and after remaining in the same for about an
hour, she came out with her hair and her dress in disorder; that Flaviana
told her immediately that she was raped against her will by Colonel
Mini; that she (Feliciana), after leaving the residence of said Jap officer,
was taken by Perez to an uninhabited house and there by threat and
intimidation, the accused succeeded in raping her; that when she
returned to her (the witness), Flaviana was crying; that the following day
while conducting the two girls back to their hometown, she (Feliciana)
was also raped by the accused in an uninhabited house, against her will.
"Victoriana Arayan (mother of Feliciana and Flaviana Bonalos)
testified as follows: That on June 15, 1942, the accused came and told her
that the Japs needed her daughters to be witnesses; that accordingly, her
daughters, under that understanding, started for Tagbilaran; that later,
she went to Tagbilaran to look for her daughters and she found them in
the office of the Puppet Governor; that on seeing her, both daughters
wept and told her that they were turned over to the Japs and raped
them; that her daughter Flaviana told her (the witness) that after the
Japs had raped her the accused also raped her (Flaviana) in an
uninhabited house; that the accused did not permit her two daughters to
return home on the pretext that the Puppet Governor was then absent
and in the meanwhile they stayed in the house of the accused Perez; that
when her daughters returned to her house ultimately, they related to her
(mother) what happened; that both daughters told her they would have
preferred death rather than to have gone to Tagbilaran; that Feliciana
told her (the mother) that the accused had raped her.

"The information given by Feliciana to her mother is admitted in
evidence as a part of the res gestae regardless of the time that had
elapsed between the occurrence and the time of the information. In the
manner these two witnesses testified in Court, there could be no doubt
that they were telling the absolute truth. It is hard to conceive that these
girls would assume and admit the ignominy they have gone through if
they were not true. The Court is fully con-
319
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 319

People vs. Perez
vinced that all the allegations contained in Count No. 5 have been
proven by the testimonies of these two witnesses beyond reasonable
doubt.
"Count No. 6, alleges: That the accused, together with his Filipino
companions, apprehended Natividad Barcinas, Nicanora Ralameda and
Teotima Barcinas, nurses of the provincial hospital, for not having
attended a dance and reception organized by the Puppet Governor in
honor of Colonel Mini and other Japs high ranking officers, which was
held in Tagbilaran market on June 25, 1942; that upon being brought
before the Puppet Governor, they were severely reprimanded by the
latter; that on July 8, 1942, again said nurses were forced to attend
another banquet and dance in order that the Jap officers Mini and
Takibayas might make a selection which girl would suit best their fancy;
that the real purpose behind those forcible invitations was to lure them
to the residence of said Japanese Officer Mini for immoral purposes.
"Natividad Barcinas, a Lieutenant of the P. A., testified at length. She

declared: That on June 29, 1942, she and companion nurses, saw the
accused coming to the hospital with a revolver and took them on a car to
the office of the Puppet Governor where they were severely reprimanded
by the latter for not attending the dance held on June 25, 1942; that the
real purpose in compelling them to attend said dances and receptions
was to select from among them the best girl that would suit the fancy of
Colonel Mini for immoral purposes; that she and her companions were
always afraid of the accused Perez whenever he came to said hospital;
that on one occasion, one of the nurses on perceiving the approach of the
accused, ran up into her room, laid down on her bed and simulated to be
sick; that said accused, not satisfied, went up into the room of that
particular nurse and pulled out the blanket which covered her and
telling her that it was only her pretext that she was sick.
"The testimony of Lt. Natividad Barcinas is fully corroborated by that
of Nicanora Ralameda. Said testimony need not be reproduced here."
In a carefully written brief for the appellant, these find-

ings are not questioned, but it is contended that the deeds
committed by the accused do not constitute treason. The
Solicitor General submits the opposite view, and argues
that "to maintain and preserve the morale of the soldiers
has always been, and will always be, a fundamental
concern of army authorities, for the efficiency of an army

rests not
320

People vs. Perez

only on its physical attributes but also, mainly, on the
morale of its soldiers" (citing the annual report of the Chief
of Staff, United States Army, for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 1933).
If furnishing women for immoral purposes to the
enemies was treason because women's company kept up
their morale, so fraternizing with them, entertaining them
at parties, selling them food and drinks, and kindred acts,
would be treason. For any act of hospitality without doubt
produces the same general result. Yet by common
agreement those and similar manifestations of sympathy
and attachment are not the kind of disloyalty that are
punished as treason.
In a broad sense, the law of treason does not prescribe
all kinds of social, business and political intercourse be-
tween the belligerent occupants of the invaded country and
its inhabitants. In the nature of things, the occupation of a
country by the enemy is bound to create relations of all
sorts between the invaders and the natives. What aid and
comfort constitute treason must depend upon their nature,
degree and purpose. To draw a line between treasonable
and untreasonable assistance is not always easy. The scope
of adherence to the enemy is comprehensive, Ha
requirement indeterminate, as was said in Cramer ra.
United States, 89 Law. ed., 1441.
As a general rule, to be treasonous the extent of the aid
and comfort given to the enemies must be to render assist-
ance to them as enemies and not merely as individuals and.
in addition, be directly in furtherance of the enemies'
hostile designs. To make a simple distinction: To lend or
give money to an enemy as a friend or out of charity to the
beneficiary so that he may buy personal necessities is to
assist him as an individual and is not technically
traitorous. On the other hand, to lend or give him money to
enable him to buy arms or ammunition to use in waginf
war against the giver's country enhances his strength and
by the same count injures the interest of the government of
321
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 321

People vs. Perez

the giver. That is treason. (See United States vs. Fricke,
259 F., 673; 63 C. J., 816, 817.)
Applying these principles to the case at bar, appellant's
first assignment of error is correct. His "commandeering" of
women to satisfy the lust of Japanese officers or men or to
enliven the entertainments held in their honor was not
treason even though the women and the entertainments
helped to make life more pleasant for the enemies and
boost their spirit; he was not guilty any more than the
women themselves would have been if they voluntarily and
willingly had surrendered their bodies or organized the
entertainments. Sexual and social relations with the
Japanese did not directly and materially tend to improve
their war efforts or to weaken the power of the United
States. The acts herein charged were not, by fair
implication, calculated to strengthen the Japanese Empire
or its army or to cripple the defense and resistance of the
other side. Whatever favorable effect the defendant's
collaboration with the Japanese might have in their
prosecution of the war was trivial, imperceptible, and
unintentional. Intent of disloyalty is a vital ingredient in
the crime of treason, which, in the absence of admission,
may be gathered from the nature and circumstances of
each particular case.
But the accused may be punished for the rape of
Eriberta Ramo, Eduarda Daohog, Eutiquia Lamay and
Flaviana Bonalos as principal by direct participation.
Without his cooperation in the manner above stated, these
rapes could not have been committed.
Conviction of the accused of rapes instead of treason
finds express sanction in section 2 of Commonwealth Act
No. 682, which says:
"Provided further, That where, in its opinion, the
evidence is not suflficient to support the offense (treason)
charged, the People's Court may, nevertheless, convict and
sentence the accused for any crime included in the acts
alleged in the information and established by the
evidence."
All the above mentioned rapes are alleged in the
information and substantiated by the evidence.
28660—21
322

People vs. Perez
Counsel assails the constitutionality of this provision as

violative of section 1, paragraph 17, Article III of the
Constitution, which guarantees to an accused the right "to
be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
against him." The contention is not well taken. The
provision in question requires that the private crimes of
which an accused of treason may be convicted must be
averred in the information and sustained by evidence. In
the light of this enactment, the defendant was warned of
the hazard that he might be found guilty of rapes if he was
innocent of treason and thus afforded an opportunity to
prepare and meet them. There is no element of surprise or
anomaly involved. In fact, under the general law of
criminal procedure, conviction for a crime different from
that designated in the complaint or information is allowed
and practised, provided only that such crime "is included or
described in the body of the information, and is afterwards
justified by the proof presented during the trial." (People
vs. Perez. 45 Phil., 599.)
The defendant personally assaulted and abused two of
the offended girls but these assaults are not charged
against him and should be ruled out. The crime of coercion
alleged and found on count No. 6 need not be noticed in
view of the severity of the penalty for the other crimes
which he must suffer.
We find the defendant guilty of four separate crimes of
rape and sentence him for each of them to an
indeterminate penalty of from 10 years of prisión mayor to
17 years and 4 months of reclusión temporal, with the
accessories of law, to indemnify each of the offended women
in the sum of P3,000, and to pay the costs; it being
understood thai the total duration of these penalties shall
not exceed fortj years.
Moran, C. J., Feria, Perfecto, Bengzon, Briones, anc

Reyes, JJ., concur.
323
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 323

People vs. Perez
PARAS, J.:
I reserve my vote.
MONTEMAYOR, J.:
I concur in the result.
PABLO, M., disidente:
Disiento. En mi opinión, los hechos probados constituyen
delito de traición.
El acusado, al reclutar con sus compañeros, muchas
señoritas de buena reputación en Bohol para ponerlas a
disposición de los oficiales del ejercito enemigo, ha ayudado
a ellos en la obra de destrucción. En la guerra se emplea la
destrucción para triunfar, y la destrucción se realiza en las
cosas y en las personas. Inutilizar para el trabajo o para la
guerra a los habitantes del país invadido es destruirles en
mayor o menor grado y violar o deshonrar a las mujeres es
también destruirlas material y moralmente y es peor aun
que matar y aniquilar. En el caso presente, el acusado
ayudo al Coronel Mini y Dr. Takibayas en deshonrar a
varias señoritas, poniéndolas en una situación peor que la
de las esclavas. Si el reclutar a hombres o mujeres para ser
obligados a construir trincheras para el ejercito invasor
constituye delito de traición; si el apoderarse del arroz de
los ciudadanos en sus casas para dárselo a los soldados
hambrientos del ejercito japonés es traición; ¿por que no ha
de constituir traición el reclutar a señoritas para ser
utilizadas por los enemigos en sus deseos bestiales, como
un medio de entretenimiento o alivio de sus trabajos? Fla-
viana y Feliciana Bonalos, ilegalmente arrestadas y entre-
gadas después a los dos oficiales-bestias, en su declaración,
han dicho que hubieran preferido morir que ser violadas.
El argumento del Procurador General, que merece seria
consideración, es del tenor siguiente:
"In the United States Army, and we believe this is also true in the
Japanese Imperial Forces, a unit known as the United Services
Organization (U. S. O.) functions with the primordial aim and view to
keep at peak the morale of the soldiers. Ta achieve this, varied
324

People vs. Perez
forms of entertainment like movies, dances, stage shows and the like
are provided for at an enormous expense. In fine, the soldiers are
surrounded with all the comforts and opportunities that they ordinarily
enjoy in their normal civilian life. The reason for this is to tone their
nerves and minimize as much as possible, the heavy strain on them
incident to the nature of their mission in time of war. Such
entertainment becomes the more imperative when it comes to soldiers
who are assigned overseas, on a foreign soil, in a no man's land, devoid of

the inspiring association of their families, girl friends and all those
dearest to them.
“* * * Clearly, therefore, appellant provided them with what should
have been the burden of the Japanese Imperial Forces, relieving the
latter of the trouble, expense, and difficulty of sending over to these
Islands Japanese women to entertain their soldiers to bolster up their
morale. In other words, the services of the Japanese women, who were so
replaced by ours, through the efforts of the appellant, could be diverted
to other important phases of military activities either in the homeland or
in this sector. Hence, the aid and comfort to the enemy is evident."
Si el Coronel Mini y Dr. Takibayas del ejército japonés

no encontraban otro consuelo o solaz para olvidar su pre-
ocupación y tristezas más que en saciar su lujuria, entonces
el proporcionarles mujeres contra la voluntad de estas es
ayudarles en recuperar entusiasmos perdidos e infundirles
nuevo vigor para proseguir la guerra de conquista. Bien
sabido esta que los soldados no son maquinas de acero que
pueden estar peleando todas las horas de todos los días;
necesitan tiempo de descanso para recuperar fuerzas
perdidas, de entretenimiento para olvidar lúgubres
pensamientos y franco esparcimiento para vigorizar su
espíritu. Si para el Coronel Mini y Dr. Takibayas, el violar
a las señoritas reclutadas por el acusado era buena
recompensa de sus esfuerzos militares, entonces para ellos
vale la pena de exponer la vida en la lucha porque después
de todo quedan bien compensados. ¿Que mayor satisfacción
para ellos como la de disfrutar libremente de las señoritas
de la provincia con la ayuda del acusado? Por esa
satisfacción, re-doblarían sus esfuerzos de conquista para
tener otras oportunidades de saciar sus apetitos bestiales.
Bajo tales inclinaciones morbosas, darles entretenimiento,
solaz y esparcimiento es ayudarles en la guerra.
325
VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 325

People vs. Perez

No es exagerado suponer que dichos oficiales japoneses
hayan dejado en su país hijos, esposas y madres a quienes
quieren de corazón, y en sus momentos de soledad, de
tristeza y de nostalgia, no es imposible que se acuerden de
ellos y lleguen a decir para si mismos: "¿Que sacamos de
esta guerra de invasión, dejando a nuestros hijos, nuestras
familias y nuestros hogares abandonados solo para
satisfacer las ambiciones de conquista del emperador?

Cada vez que nos damos cuenta de que no somos más que
unos simples instrumentos para sacrificar tantas vidas y
haciendas para la vanagloria del japon, se nos rebela la
concien-cia. Creemos que la guerra es inicua, injusta:
debemos abandonarla. No debemos continuar invadiendo
territorios." Si estos pensamientos persistiesen en la mente
de dichos oficiales, indudablemente perderían su
entusiasmo, su eficiencia en el servicio: su obsesión les
haría indiferentes, pasivos, inútiles para la guerra. Pueden
deponer su actitud, pueden cruzarse de brazos e inclusive
pueden desertar, y eso seria fatal para la nación invasora.
Pero si, por inclinación natural, encuentran
entretenimiento, esparcimiento y alegría en violar mujeres,
entonces el proporcionárseles es una ayuda efectiva. Es
darles calor, entusiasmo y valor en la guerra de conquista.
¿Hay mayor traición como el poner a disposition de los
enemigos al ser mas querido, a la mujer? Que se apoderen
de todos nuestros productos, de todos nuestros recursos: de
todo cuanto encuentran a su paso; pero, por Dios, salvemos
el honor de nuestras mujeres.
Voto por que el acusado sea condenado por el delito de
traición.
Judgment modified; penalty reduced.
© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

People v. Perez, 83 Phil. 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

People v. Perez, 83 Phil. 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

People v. Perez, 83 Phil. 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

9/17/2020 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 083

[No. L-856. April 18, 1949]

NOT TREASON.—"Commandeering" of women to satisfy the lust of

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 315

and unintentional. Intent of disloyalty is a vital ingredient in the

APPEAL from a judgment of the People's Court.

316 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

"It would be unnecessary to recite here the testimonies of all the

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 317

318 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

"Feliciana Bonalos testifying in this count, declared: that the accused

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 319

"Natividad Barcinas, a Lieutenant of the P. A., testified at length. She

In a carefully written brief for the appellant, these find-

concern of army authorities, for the efficiency of an army

320 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 321

322 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

Counsel assails the constitutionality of this provision as

Moran, C. J., Feria, Perfecto, Bengzon, Briones, anc

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 323

324 PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED

who are assigned overseas, on a foreign soil, in a no man's land, devoid of

Si el Coronel Mini y Dr. Takibayas del ejército japonés

VOL. 83, APRIL 18, 1949 325

satisfacer las ambiciones de conquista del emperador?

Judgment modified; penalty reduced.

© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like