Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    2007-Aashto 2010-Fhwa: Mixed

    Uploaded by

    Andrew Schoolastic
    This document appears to present numerical data comparing different design methods for soil types using various factors. The data shows average values of phi (φ) for different soil types, design methods, and factors like NCHRP and AND, with some methods showing differences of -18% to -49% compared to others.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    2007-Aashto 2010-Fhwa: Mixed

    Uploaded by

    Andrew Schoolastic
    9 views2 pages
    This document appears to present numerical data comparing different design methods for soil types using various factors. The data shows average values of phi (φ) for different soil types, design methods, and factors like NCHRP and AND, with some methods showing differences of -18% to -49% compared to others.

    Original Title

    Summery2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to present numerical data comparing different design methods for soil types using various factors. The data shows average values of phi (φ) for different soil types, design methods, and factors like NCHRP and AND, with some methods showing differences of -18% to -49% compared to others.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    2007-Aashto 2010-Fhwa: Mixed

    Uploaded by

    Andrew Schoolastic
    This document appears to present numerical data comparing different design methods for soil types using various factors. The data shows average values of phi (φ) for different soil types, design methods, and factors like NCHRP and AND, with some methods showing differences of -18% to -49% compared to others.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    A avg. φMcS avg.

    φAND
    Soil Type Design Method
    b = 2.33 b = 3.0 b = 2.33 b = 3.0 b = 2.33 b = 3.0
    2007-AASHTO 0.64 0.60 0.35 0.26 0.53 0.42
    Mixed
    2010-FHwA 0.42 0.40
    φNCHRP diff. AND diff.H
    b = 2.33 b = 3.0
    0.65 0.5 -18% -16% -46% -49%

    You might also like