Computer Abstractions and Technology: Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

COMPUTER ORGANIZATION AND DESIGN RISC-V
Edition
The Hardware/Software Interface
Chapter 1
Computer Abstractions
and Technology
Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

Content
1.2 Eight Great Ideas in Computer Architecture
(Review)
1.5 Technologies for Building Processors and
Memory
1.6 Performance (Review)
1.7 The Power Wall
1.8 The Sea Change: The Switch from
Uniprocessors to Multiprocessors
1.9 Real Stuff: Benchmarking the Intel Core i7
1.10 Fallacies and Pitfalls
1.11 Concluding Remarks
Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 2
§1.2 Eight Great Ideas in Computer Architecture
Eight Great Ideas
 Design for Moore’s Law
 Use abstraction to simplify design
 Make the common case fast
 Performance via parallelism
 Performance via pipelining
 Performance via prediction
 Hierarchy of memories
 Dependability via redundancy

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
§1.5 Technologies for Building Processors and Memory
Technology Trends
 Electronics
technology
continues to evolve
 Increased capacity
and performance
 Reduced cost
DRAM capacity
Year Technology Relative performance/cost

1951 Vacuum tube 1
1965 Transistor 35
1975 Integrated circuit (IC) 900
1995 Very large scale IC (VLSI) 2,400,000
2013 Ultra large scale IC 250,000,000,000

Semiconductor Technology
 Silicon: semiconductor
 Add materials to transform properties:
 Conductors
 Insulators
 Switch

Manufacturing ICs
 Yield: proportion of working dies per wafer

Intel Core i7 Wafer
 300mm wafer, 280 chips, 32nm technology

 Each chip is 20.7 x 10.5 mm
Integrated Circuit Cost
Cost per wafer
Cost per die 
Dies per wafer  Yield
Dies per wafer  Wafer area Die area
1
Yield 
(1 (Defects per area  Die area/2)) 2
 Nonlinear relation to area and defect rate

 Wafer cost and area are fixed
 Defect rate determined by manufacturing process
 Die area determined by architecture and circuit design

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
Response Time and Throughput
 Response time
 How long it takes to do a task
 Throughput
 Total work done per unit time
 e.g., tasks/transactions/… per hour
 How are response time and throughput affected
by
 Replacing the processor with a faster version?
 Adding more processors?
 We’ll focus on response time for now…

Relative Performance
 Define Performance = 1/Execution Time
 “X is n time faster than Y”
Performanc e X Performanc e Y
 Execution time Y Execution time X  n
 Example: time taken to run a program

 10s on A, 15s on B
 Execution TimeB / Execution TimeA
= 15s / 10s = 1.5
 So A is 1.5 times faster than B
Measuring Execution Time
 Elapsed time
 Total response time, including all aspects
 Processing, I/O, OS overhead, idle time
 Determines system performance
 CPU time
 Time spent processing a given job
 Discounts I/O time, other jobs’ shares
 Comprises user CPU time and system CPU
time
 Different programs are affected differently by
CPU and system performance
CPU Clocking
 Operation of digital hardware governed by a
constant-rate clock
Clock period
Clock (cycles)
Data transfer
and computation
Update state
 Clock period: duration of a clock cycle

 e.g., 250ps = 0.25ns = 250×10–12s
 Clock frequency (rate): cycles per second
 e.g., 4.0GHz = 4000MHz = 4.0×109Hz
CPU Time
CPU Time  CPU Clock Cycles  Clock Cycle Time
CPU Clock Cycles

Clock Rate
 Performance improved by
 Reducing number of clock cycles
 Increasing clock rate
 Hardware designer must often trade off clock
rate against cycle count

Instruction Count and CPI
Clock Cycles  Instructio n Count  Cycles per Instructio n
CPU Time  Instructio n Count  CPI Clock Cycle Time
Instructio n Count  CPI

Clock Rate
 Instruction Count for a program
 Determined by program, ISA and compiler
 Average cycles per instruction
 Determined by CPU hardware
 If different instructions have different CPI
 Average CPI affected by instruction mix

CPI in More Detail
 If different instruction classes take different
numbers of cycles
n
Clock Cycles   (CPIi  Instructio n Count i )
i1
 Weighted average CPI

Clock Cycles n
 Instructio n Count i 
CPI     CPIi  
Instructio n Count i1  Instructio n Count 
Relative frequency

Performance Summary
The BIG Picture
Instructio ns Clock cycles Seconds

CPU Time   
Program Instructio n Clock cycle
 Performance depends on
 Algorithm: affects IC, possibly CPI
 Programming language: affects IC, CPI
 Compiler: affects IC, CPI
 Instruction set architecture: affects IC, CPI, Tc

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
§1.7 The Power Wall
Power Trends
 In CMOS IC technology
Power  Capacitive load  Voltage 2  Frequency
×30 5V → 1V ×1000

Reducing Power
 Suppose a new CPU has
 85% of capacitive load of old CPU
 15% voltage and 15% frequency reduction
Pnew Cold  0.85  (Vold  0.85) 2  Fold  0.85
  0.85 4
 0.52
Cold  Vold  Fold
2
Pold
 The power wall

 We can’t reduce voltage further
 We can’t remove more heat
 How else can we improve performance?
Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
§1.8 The Sea Change: The Switch to Multiprocessors
Uniprocessor Performance
Constrained by power, instruction-level parallelism,

memory latency

Multiprocessors
 Multicore microprocessors
 More than one processor per chip
 Requires explicitly parallel programming
 Compare with instruction level parallelism
 Hardware executes multiple instructions at once
 Hidden from the programmer
 Hard to do
 Programming for performance
 Load balancing
 Optimizing communication and synchronization

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
SPEC CPU Benchmark
 Programs used to measure performance
 Supposedly typical of actual workload
 Standard Performance Evaluation Corp (SPEC)
 Develops benchmarks for CPU, I/O, Web, …
 SPEC CPU2006
 Elapsed time to execute a selection of programs
 Negligible I/O, so focuses on CPU performance
 Normalize relative to reference machine
 Summarize as geometric mean of performance ratios
 CINT2006 (integer) and CFP2006 (floating-point)
n
n
 Execution time ratio
i1
i

CINT2006 for Intel Core i7 920

SPEC Power Benchmark
 Power consumption of server at different
workload levels
 Performance: ssj_ops/sec
 Power: Watts (Joules/sec)
 10   10 
Overall ssj_ops per Watt    ssj_ops i    power i 
 i0   i0 

SPECpower_ssj2008 for Xeon X5650

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
§1.10 Fallacies and Pitfalls
Pitfall: Amdahl’s Law
 Improving an aspect of a computer and
expecting a proportional improvement in
overall performance
Taffected
Timproved   Tunaffected
improvemen t factor
 Example: multiply accounts for 80s/100s
 How much improvement in multiply performance to
get 5× overall?
80  Can’t be done!
20   20
n
 Corollary: make the common case fast
Fallacy: Low Power at Idle
 Look back at i7 power benchmark
 At 100% load: 258W
 At 50% load: 170W (66%)
 At 10% load: 121W (47%)
 Google data center
 Mostly operates at 10% – 50% load
 At 100% load less than 1% of the time
 Consider designing processors to make
power proportional to load

Pitfall: MIPS as a Performance Metric
 MIPS: Millions of Instructions Per Second
 Doesn’t account for
 Differences in ISAs between computers
 Differences in complexity between instructions
Instructio n count
MIPS 
Execution time  10 6
Instructio n count Clock rate
 
Instructio n count  CPI CPI  10 6
 10 6
Clock rate
 CPI varies between programs on a given CPU

Content
(Review)
Memory
1.7 The Power Wall
§1.11 Concluding Remarks
Concluding Remarks
 Cost/performance is improving
 Due to underlying technology development
 Execution time: the best performance
measure
 Power is a limiting factor
 Use parallelism to improve performance

Computer Abstractions and Technology: Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Computer Abstractions and Technology: Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Computer Abstractions and Technology: Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COMPUTER ORGANIZATION AND DESIGN RISC-V

Adapted by Prof. Gheith Abandah

 Use abstraction to simplify design

 Make the common case fast

 Performance via parallelism

 Performance via pipelining

 Performance via prediction

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 3

Year Technology Relative performance/cost

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 5

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 6

 Yield: proportion of working dies per wafer

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 7

 300mm wafer, 280 chips, 32nm technology

 Nonlinear relation to area and defect rate

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 9

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 11

 Example: time taken to run a program

 Clock period: duration of a clock cycle

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 15

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 16

 Weighted average CPI

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 17

Instructio ns Clock cycles Seconds

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 18

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 20

 The power wall

Constrained by power, instruction-level parallelism,

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 23

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 24

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 26

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 27

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 28

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 29

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 32

 CPI varies between programs on a given CPU

Chapter 1 — Computer Abstractions and Technology — 35

You might also like