Approaching The 2013 Framework Implementation
Approaching The 2013 Framework Implementation
Approaching The 2013 Framework Implementation
Before launching into the next sections, it is providing appropriate medical care, the process
important to briefly examine some basic concepts includes obtaining payment information (in the form
and why those of payment, insurance verification, or other means)
concepts are such an integral part of the 2013 from the patient, accurately coding and billing for the
Framework implementation. COSO defines internal services rendered, and applying payments received to
control as “a process, effected by an entity’s board the patient account. Timely and detailed medical
of directors, management, and other personnel, documentation by the medical staff is imperative.
designed to provide reasonable assurance
Consideration also needs to be given
regarding the achievement to the various IT systems (EHR, billing, etc.) that are
of objectives relating to operations, reporting, and
used throughout the process. If these processes are not
compliance.” COSO provides further characterization of
designed and implemented effectively, the healthcare
the objectives, which allow organizations to focus on organization may not achieve its operational,
different aspects of internal control: “Operational
compliance, and reporting objectives within the
OBJECTIVES pertain to effectiveness and efficiency of the
revenue cycle.
entity’s operations, including operational and financial
performance goals, Therefore, an organization’s stakeholders play an
and safeguarding assets against loss. Reporting OBJECTIVES important role in implementing the 2013 Framework. For
pertain to internal and external financial and nonfinancial example, senior management and members of the
reporting and may encompass reliability, timeliness, board of directors should generally understand the
transparency, or other terms as set forth by regulators, 2013 Framework and
recognized standard setters, or the entity’s policies. its implementation benefits, costs, and approach. These
Compliance OBJECTIVES pertain to adherence to laws parties may already have a broad understanding of
and regulations to which the entity is subject.”3 the necessity for an effective internal control system,
and some may perform or support internal controls as
The hospital system has to comply with a significant a part of their daily routine. It is possible, however,
number of laws and regulations before the patient that there may not
even steps through its doors, while the patient is being be a full understanding of what is essential to
cared for, and after the patient leaves when billing is implement the 2013 Framework. This can be resolved
performed. If any of those operational processes is not through proper
working properly, there will be a financial impact to the communication, training, and integration as well as a
organization because of the inability to obtain strong, supportive tone at the top, which are all
reimbursement for the services rendered. Given the elements imbedded within the 2013 Framework.
importance of internal controls, their design and
execution (or lack thereof) can greatly affect the Once awareness among the most senior leaders is
various objectives and strategies of an organization, established, the organization needs to formulate an
ultimately affecting its success. overall plan for implementation, including mechanisms for
gaining support throughout the organization. An
As an example of how those objectives apply to a implementation team should be staffed with
process within a healthcare organization and how individuals who have expertise in internal control and
important it is to set objectives, let’s use the a strong working knowledge of
revenue cycle. Typically, the revenue cycle is the organization to minimize the learning curve.
considered a high-risk area to an organization, and it The implementation team should first spend time
requires many controls throughout the process. As a developing a project implementation plan, including plans
patient receives services in a healthcare for assessing, designing, implementing, and
setting, numerous departments are involved and maintaining systems of internal control. The approach
necessitate continuous coordination and oversight. In that follows (Exhibit 3) is one of many different ways
addition to the 2013 Framework can be implemented within a
healthcare organization.
Given the current environment in many larger healthcare organizations that have gone through multiple
mergers and acquisitions in recent years in order to increase performance and decrease costs,
strengthening
the current internal control environment in order to successfully handle the growth and complexity of
the larger organization could be a significant driver in implementing the 2013 Framework. Because of
competing priorities, the board may want to delegate authority to
a committee (e.g., an audit and compliance committee [A&CC]) to oversee the implementation
process. The A&CC and management can then select a management function such as internal control
or ERM to oversee the implementation efforts. Internal audit may assist the responsible function by
providing advice and input based on their overall knowledge of the organizational internal control structure
and areas of risk. Furthermore, the assistance of outside consultants could provide additional expertise
and initial and continuous support.
Healthcare organizations also may find it necessary to use leaders and staff from within the accounting
department, as those individuals may have broad familiarity with the entity’s organizational structure and
key process areas. It is
most important to identify an ownership department that has deep, broad knowledge of how work is conducted
within the organization. The ultimate selection will vary by organization, but it is also important to understand
that internal controls are the responsibility of the entire organization. Therefore,
in order to meet the goals and objectives of an organization, an effective internal control structure has to be
owned and managed by all process owners.
Planning
In any well-managed project, the planning phase usually is the most important. Once
support for implementation is garnered and the responsible team is identified, the
next step is to develop the implementation plan. Several key areas should be
considered in the plan, including a reasonable timeline, the number and types of
resources
needed, and the determination of roles and responsibilities of the implementation
team. Because many competing priorities are being handled simultaneously throughout
a healthcare organization at any point in time, the timeline should be flexible enough
to accommodate shifting priorities. This might mean pushing the documentation
of one process back and accelerating another, which requires flexibility from the
implementation team and the full cooperation of management. Depending on the timeline
urgency, the organization should consider the size of the implementation team and
determine if the established team has sufficient knowledge of and experience with
the covered processes. It is common for a team to be supplemented with additional
resources from professional firms, which can help keep the timeline on target,
document and test specific complex processes, or take advantage of lessons learned
from other implementation efforts.
Scoping
Scope is determined by the range of activities and by the period of record that
are to be evaluated. Using COSO’s guidance, an organization’s management should
focus on areas with the highest risks that could affect the organization’s ability to
achieve its strategies and objectives. Therefore, the scope should be considered
before, during, and after the planning phase. When
implementing the 2013 Framework, the team should gain an understanding of the
objectives and sub-objectives set by management (or governance) during the strategic
planning process in order to identify the risks of failing to meet those objectives.
Objectives can be categorized into three types (operations, reporting, compliance), and
an objective can overlap categories. The team should evaluate the five components
of the 2013 Framework (control environment, risk assessment, control activities,
information and communication, and monitoring activities) to determine how well an
organization’s internal control system is designed and operating to help
management achieve those objectives (or allowing for timely communications if
objectives will not be met).