EY Landscaping UK Fintech PDF
EY Landscaping UK Fintech PDF
EY Landscaping UK Fintech PDF
Commissioned by
UK Trade & Investment
Foreword
Sue Langley
Chief Executive Officer
Technology applied to financial services (Fintech) has a significant impact on our daily lives, from facilitating
payments for goods and services to providing the infrastructure essential to the operation of the world’s
financial institutions.
As the world’s leading financial centre, the UK is fast becoming a destination of choice for companies wanting to
establish a global presence in the Fintech sector, with leading international companies in Fintech choosing to have
a base in the UK whilst at the same time providing a fertile environment for start-ups and entrepreneurs.
The UK Government is committed to supporting Fintech companies; creating jobs and growth as well as further
strengthening our position as the world’s pre-eminent financial services destination. Working with colleagues
across government, UK Trade & Investment (UKTI) are leading efforts to attract more inward investment to
the UK’s Fintech sector and support UK-based Fintech companies seeking to internationalise their business
and services.
In order to better inform our strategy to meet these objectives, UKTI commissioned EY to produce a report on
the UK Fintech sector. It is intended to help us map out the Fintech landscape; to create a recognised taxonomy;
and highlight important growth trends, drivers and barriers.
We have taken the step of publishing excerpts of this report for the wider Fintech community as we believe
financial technology businesses, investors and regulators will all benefit from increased research and
transparency on this increasingly important, innovative and fast growing sector.
This report has provided valuable insight and helped shape our strategy for developing and promoting this sector
in our bid to assist more companies looking to establish a presence in the UK; and help both indigenous and
foreign owned UK companies leverage opportunities internationally.
►► UK Fintech is currently energised by the cumulative effect of ►► Much of Emergent Fintech is focused on a small number
digital connectivity, customer dissatisfaction with banks, and of sectors (for example peer-to-peer platforms, payments,
a lack of innovation and investment by incumbent providers. capital markets), however we believe there is a huge amount
of white space open to disruptive and innovative models,
►► We estimate the Fintech market (as defined in the scope
particularly in the middle and back office of insurers and
agreed with UKTI) to be worth c. £20bn in annual revenue
banks.
and growing, the majority of which is generated by what we
term Traditional Fintech and in the order of 18% is generated ►► We believe the UK scores highly as an attractive location for
by Emergent Fintech. global Fintech. The size of the market opportunity in the UK
is significant due to a large indigenous and technologically
►► We describe Traditional Fintech as ‘facilitators’ (larger
sophisticated customer base, and in London’s position as
incumbent technology firms supporting the financial
a world leading centre for institutional financial services.
services sector) and Emergent Fintech as ‘disruptors’ (small,
The UK also scores highly due to the availability of capital
innovative firms disintermediating incumbent financial
which is sufficient for the sector although there are gaps at
services firms with new technology). The UK is poorly
the development capital and at the IPO stage. Interviewees
represented in Traditional Fintech (four out of the top 100
commented favourably on supporting factors including the
globally), but is strong in Emergent Fintech (one half of all
UK’s regulatory approach, financial services infrastructure
promising start-ups in Europe).
and London’s position as a global trading hub. Three of our
►► The key themes affecting the sector are the disintermediation interviewees had relocated their businesses to London due
of incumbent models, the disintermediation of incumbent to the attractiveness of the market.
infrastructure, the monetisation of data, and the requirement
►► Our interviews suggested the UK government should
for fraud and identity protection.
consider additional actions to support the Fintech community
►► We have categorised the Fintech space into Payments particularly in the areas of improving access to talent;
(c. £10bn), Software (c. £4.2bn), Data and Analytics (c. encouraging closer collaboration and information sharing
£3.8bn) and Platforms (c. £2.0bn). between established financial services businesses and
Emergent Fintech; and actively championing the sector. We
►► The highest growth areas are peer-to-peer platforms,
believe the government should also take a leadership role
online payments and the data and analytics products (credit
in setting the agenda on data/privacy protection as this will
reference, capital markets and insurance) which together
increasingly become a central pillar of the financial services
represent c. 60% of the sector.
marketplace and critical in enabling the Fintech sector to
►► We believe the UK has an international market leadership operate and prosper.
position in peer-to-peer platforms, aggregator platforms, and
the data and analytics products. Two potentially attractive
areas where the UK could build an international market
leadership position are risk management/compliance/fraud
software and online payments.
Digital connectivity
Smartphone and internet penetration have revolutionised
consumer connectivity allowing consumers and businesses
to connect in ways previously unimagined. Many of these
connections have financial components. The UK has one of the
highest levels of internet and mobile phone penetration globally,
highest e-commerce spend in Europe and is a leader in online
access to financial services.
Economic downturn
Consumer sentiment plummeted post-crisis globally and has
continued to remain low in the UK, while recovering in other
European countries. This has created an environment whereby
the UK consumer is open to adopting new business models and
products from new providers. At the same time, the crisis has
meant incumbent institutions have failed to invest in technology
and innovation.
Regulatory changes
A range of new regulation introduced in recent years has
prompted financial services industry players to monitor their
activities more stringently. This, in turn, has created demand for
a range of new and innovative solutions. The UK regulator has
also been dynamic in their approach by keeping an open mind
and engaging closely with innovators.
We observe both Traditional and Emergent models in the UK Fintech sector, with the key aspects
of both summarised below.
Traditional Emergent
►► Market players are generally perceived as facilitators ►► Market players are disruptors and innovators by nature.
Positioning
which are typically large, incumbent technology They are disintermediating incumbent financial services
vendors supporting the financial services sector. firms or provide new technology solutions to service
existing needs.
►► For example: Fiserv, SunGard, Infosys, FirstData.
►► For example: Zopa, Fidor Bank, Transferwise.
►► Companies focus on the support, maintenance and ►► Two operating models have emerged of either utilising
Infrastructure
►► Operate under established revenue models that tend ►► Emerging revenue models are broad and tend to
Revenue model
to use cost per transaction, percentage of assets or function using multiple different types of revenue stream
license fees. including advertisement and the monetisation of data.
Infrastructure replacement
The most radical Emergent Fintech players are frustrated with
existing infrastructures and are completely circumventing it.
This includes the peer-to-peer networks as well as cryptographic
currencies such as Bitcoin. Historically this strategy has
produced multinational winners in Fintech including Visa,
Mastercard and Square, and is the backdrop to the phenomenal
success of M-Pesa in Kenya. At the margin some established
Fintech are seeking to deliver a step change in legacy
infrastructure through the development or acquisition of
infrastructure accelerators.
Disintermediation
Emergent Fintech is disrupting business models and working
around incumbent financial service providers, most visibly in
peer-to-peer lending. We see mainstream consumers willing
to use the players without the traditional barriers of trust,
credibility, familiarity and scale impeding uptake.
Based on an approximate and top down view of the UK Fintech sector we believe the industry
£8.1bn
currently generates c. £20bn in revenue annually. £1.9bn
£1.0bn
£0.6bn
Financial data and analytics Financial data and analytics, £3.8bn
£2.2bn
Successful business models in this microsector rely on Credit reference Capital markets Insurance
economies of scale and ability to collect a diverse range of
£1.0bn
financial data on individuals, corporates and particular market £2.2bn £0.6bn
activities (e.g., trading). We grouped market players based on £2.2bn
the type of data into: £1.0bn
Credit reference Capital markets Insurance
£0.6bn
►► Credit reference £1.0bn
£0.6bn
►► Capital markets Credit reference Capital markets Insurance
Peer-to-peer £0.8bn
Trading Personal
£0.7bn Aggregators
£0.5bn
<£50mn wealth
£0.8bn £0.7bn
Landscaping UK Fintech Commissioned by UK Trade & Investment £0.5bn 6
<£50mn
Peer-to-peer Trading Personal Aggregators
wealth
Peer-to-peer Trading Personal Aggregators
Fintech microsector attractiveness
We set out below our Fintech microsector attractiveness matrix highlighting current size and
future growth potential.
Large
Payments:
Infrastructure
Software:
To financial
institutions
Software:
Risk management*
Data:
Capital markets
Size
Payments:
Online
Software:
Payments*
Data:
Credit reference
Platforms:
Platforms:
Trading
Personal wealth
Platforms: Data:
Aggregators Insurance
Software:
Accounting Platforms:
Peer-to-peer
Small
Growth potential
Low High
E-wallets/
Sectors Products Activities Credit reference prepaid cards Customers
Payments P2P Front office Middle office Back office Core Non-core
The UK market is one of the most attractive markets in Europe based on our analysis of market
opportunity, availability of capital and regulatory environment.
We have separated our analysis of the attractiveness of the of the market opportunity for financial services in the UK,
UK market into: the quality of infrastructure and the regulatory context.
►► Fundamental drivers which reflect the market opportunity in ►► We believe the UK scores less well in terms of availability
the UK and the availability of capital; and of capital (good versus Europe but poor versus the US)
►► Supporting factors which include a wide range of factors that and also on tax and grants, not because the UK is not
encourage firms to adopt the UK as a centre of business. generous, but rather foreign competitors are more generous
(e.g., Singapore).
►► We found that the UK, and London in particular, performs
well across a number of aspects due in part the absolute size
Source: World£1,175
Bank, United States Census Bureau
£1,017
£892 £663
£374 £539 £581
Openness to adopting new models Consumer £1,175
e-commerce £297 spend £360 £446
per capita £532
£1,017 £252
The UK has been an early adopter of a large number of £892 £1,175 £663
£374 £539 £581
innovative business models (for example, aggregators and DIY £1,017 £446 £532
UK Germany
£297 France USA £663
£892 £1,175 £360 £539
investing), particularly those offering: £2522010£374 2011 2012 £581
£1,017 £446 £532
£892 £297 £360 £663
►► Lowest upfront cost £252 £539 £581
UK Germany £374 France
£446 USA
£297 £532
£252 2010 £360
2011 2012
►► Internet delivery UK Germany France USA
2010 2011 2012
►► Greater convenience UK Germany France USA
2010
Source: IMRG X-border Training 2011 Population
Guide 2013m 2012figure obtained from
IDATE/Industry data and Ofcom
131% 132%
World leading level of mobile and internet penetration Mobile and internet penetration,95%
% of population
93%
84% 83% 80% 78%
The ability to access online services and an active online
131% 132%
economy is key to Fintech adoption. UK Germany France United States
84% 95% 93%
131% 132% (%83%
Mobile penetration 80% mobile access)
of population with 78%
The UK has one of the highest levels of mobile and internet
Internet
84%penetration 95%
(% of population80%
83% 93%
with Internet access)
penetration globally. 131% UK 132%
Germany France 78%
United States
Mobile penetration (%83% 95%
of population with 93%
UK84% Germany France80% mobile access)
United 78%
States
Internet penetration (% of population with Internet access)
Mobile penetration (% of population with mobile access)
UK Germany France United States
Internet penetration (% of population with Internet access)
Source:Mobile penetration
Mobile penetration ITU(%International,
of population withpenetration
internet mobile access)
World Stats
Internet penetration (% of population with Internet access)
the financial crisis which, to date, has still not returned, leading
47% 49%
to consumer willingness to try alternative providers. 42% 39% 32% 68%
level level
Confidence
2008 2013
47% 23% 42%
23% 49%
UK Germany 39%
France
32% US
Confidence
UK 2008
Germany 2013
France US
2008 2013
41% 49%
34%
19% 23%
2% 3% 4% 7% 7% 8% 0%
►► The UK is a global leader in trading related activity, and in particular foreign exchange and over the counter derivatives #1
Foreign exchange turnover Interest rates OTC derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives,
49% number of contracts traded
41% 34%
19% UK 49% US 23% Germany France
41% 2% 3% 4% 7% 7% 8% 0%
23% 34%
19%
Foreign exchange 3%
2% turnover Interest rates OTC 7%
4%derivatives 8%
7%Exchange-traded derivatives,
0%
number of contracts traded
Foreign exchange turnover Interest rates OTC derivatives Exchange-traded derivatives,
UK US Germany France number of contracts traded
UK US Germany France
UK US Germany France
►► The UK is a leading provider of insurance services that account for 7% of worldwide premium income; with specific
#3
strengths in speciality insurance.
26%
21%
7% 5% 6% 6% 4% 4%
Breakdown26%
of worldwide premium income Marine insurance net premium income
21%
7% 26% UK US Germany France
5% 6% 6% 4% 4%
21%
7%The City UK
Source: BIS and
5% 6% 6% 4% 4%
Breakdown of worldwide premium income Marine insurance net premium income
Breakdown of worldwide premium UK
income US Germany France
Marine insurance net premium income
UK US Germany France
11 Landscaping UK Fintech Commissioned by UK Trade & Investment
Fundamental drivers: availability of capital
The schematic below maps the stages of a company’s development to the availability of capital in
the UK market. UK companies have good access to capital, however, there are weaknesses at the
development and IPO stages relative to the US.
►►Private investors ►►VCs invested ►►28%4 of all European ►►42%5 of all ►►There have been no
account for £800mn £300mn–£400mn2 PE investment was acquisitions in Europe Fintech IPOs in the
to £1bn of early stage in to the UK in 2012. made in UK and by the Fintech 100 in last three years.
investments in the There are c. 140 Ireland3. last the three years
UK1. active funds in the UK. were in the UK.
►►Angel investors in the ►►VCs invested c. £5bn1 ►►A total of $426bn3 ►►Globally UK accounted ►►The NASDAQ has
US market
US provided c. £18bn in the US. There are was invested by US PE for 10% of trade had 108 IPOs in
of funding. c. 800 active funds in funds in 2012. acquisitions while 52% the financial and
the US. were in the US, 14% in technology space in
Europe and 24% RoW. the last three years.
14 of these were
Fintech companies.
Source: EY analysis
Source: 1UK Business Angels Association; 2NVCA year book 2013; 3BVCA; 4Private equity growth capital council; 5European Venture Capital Association, 2012;
6
Mergermarket/Capital IQ.
Payments
Platforms
Imran Gulamhuseinwala
Partner
EMEIA Financial Services — Transaction Advisory Services,
Commercial Advisory
+ 44 20 7980 9563
igulamhuseinwala@uk.ey.com
Angelina Kouznetsova
Director
EMEIA Financial Services — Transaction Advisory Services,
Mergers & Acquisitions
+ 44 20 7951 3092
akouznetsova@uk.ey.com
About EY
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services.
The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence
in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop
outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of
our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better
working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of
the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a
separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited
by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information
about our organization, please visit ey.com.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes
only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax or other
professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.
Ernst & Young LLP
The UK firm Ernst & Young LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales
with registered number OC300001 and is a member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited.
ED None
In line with EY’s commitment to minimise its impact on the environment, this document
has been printed on paper with a high recycled content.
Information in this publication is intended to provide only a general outline of the subjects covered.
It should neither be regarded as comprehensive nor sufficient for making decisions, nor should it be
used in place of professional advice. Ernst & Young LLP accepts no responsibility for any loss arising
from any action taken or not taken by anyone using this material.
ey.com/uk