Fiction Analysis Essay
Fiction Analysis Essay
Fiction Analysis Essay
General
The word “explication” comes from the Latin verb explicare, meaning to “unfold.” When
you explicate a work of literature, you “unfold” some of its nuances by carefully analyzing
a portion of it—by drawing out and revealing some aspect of the text’s imaginative
representation. You can analyze plot, character, setting, narrative point of view, style,
and so on. Of course, you can’t account for everything that goes on in a text, so you
should focus on one element (or perhaps a pair of very closely connected elements) that
you think enlightens an overall reading of the work.
For this paper, you will write an explication of one aspect of a short story, to be selected
from the list below. Your paper should offer:
Preliminary
1. Choose one of the following stories. (You may make a case for doing another story,
but I would prefer that you stick to these).
2. Read the story several times, annotating it as you did for the fiction annotation
project. Take special note of the questions and problems that the text seems to
present.
3. Your annotations should reveal to you a set of concerns that you have with the text—
related issues that your mind seems to be drawn to. Write about these concerns in a
"free writing" style; get them down and explain the ideas to yourself on paper. This is
a "pre-draft" that no one else will see, so don't worry about spelling or grammar. Just
write about the ideas and concerns that seem important to you, trying to relate the
ideas to one another. This set of related ideas will become your subject.
1. Construct a THESIS that indicates (a) your focus, and (b) the relation of that focus to
the story as a whole.
A thesis is a clear statement of the point you want to make about the story. Your
thesis is argumentative; it should not be an obvious point, but a thoughtful
statement indicating the complexity and depth of the story, a statement that
needs support and proof. Don’t settle for the first generalization that comes to
mind; that approach almost always leads to trite responses and poor grades. I’m
always on the lookout for the “so what?” factor in paper topics. Ask yourself:
“Could my thesis or opinion cause a reader to respond, ‘Yes, that’s true, but so
what?’ Or will my thesis illuminate for the reader some point that he or she might
not have noticed at first reading?”
Some examples of theses:
A Non-Argumentative (and Therefore Poor) Thesis: “The characters in
Hawthorne’s ‘Young Goodman Brown’ are Puritans.” This thesis is not an
opinion, it is a fact. Facts can’t be argued, so the paper is doomed. Here is a “so
what?” thesis if ever I heard one.
A Too-Vague (and Therefore Meaningless) Thesis: “‘Young Goodman Brown’ is
about Puritanism.” This statement is a little more argumentative than the one
above, but it fails to indicate your focus: how is the story “about” Puritanism?
What aspect(s) of Puritanism does Hawthorne emphasize? How does he
emphasize them? Why?
A Better Thesis: “In his story ‘Young Goodman Brown,’ Nathaniel Hawthorne
examines the dangers of Puritan extremism about evil. Because Goodman
Brown is oppressed by his belief in the power of the devil, he eventually allows
this belief to overpower his faith in God.” This thesis narrows the focus to
Goodman Brown’s views of evil.
Another Good Thesis: “In ‘Young Goodman Brown,’ Nathaniel Hawthorne uses
the journey motif to represent the protagonist’s gradual psychological awakening,
and his gradual decline into spiritual despair.” Here we understand that the writer
is concentrating on one aspect of the story (the journey motif) and “unfolding” a
larger idea from that aspect (psychological awakening and spiritual despair).
2. EVIDENCE: Find quotations and examples in the story that support your thesis, and
organize the rest of you paper around this evidence. In a paper based on the “Better
Thesis” above, the reader will expect concrete evidence showing (a) that Brown
originally has a strong faith in God; (b) that he has a strong belief in the devil’s
powers; (c) that he lets his recognition of evil destroy his conviction of the existence
of good; and (d) that Hawthorne ties all of these ideas clearly to Puritan religious
tenets. With “Another Good Thesis,” the reader expects the writer (a) to examine the
stages of Brown’s journeys as they relate to his changing psychology, (b) to offer
quotations from the text that demonstrate the journey stages and Brown’s
psychology, and (c) to conclude by showing how the journeys contribute to the
story’s meaning.
3. CONCLUSION: Rather than offer a re-hash of the paper’s argument and evidence,
the conclusion should broaden the focus of the essay, and comment on the larger
importance of the reading you’ve just offered. What does a reading like yours tell us
about the element of fiction you’ve been examining, the culture(s) which produced
the works, or the short story form itself?