0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2012 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2012 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
0510 English As A Second Language: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2012 Question Paper For The Guidance of Teachers
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes must be read in conjunction with the question papers and the report on the
examination.
• Cambridge will not enter into discussions or correspondence in connection with these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2012 question papers for most IGCSE,
GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level syllabuses and some Ordinary Level
syllabuses.
Page 2 Mark Scheme: Teachers’ version Syllabus Paper
IGCSE – May/June 2012 0510 21
This component forms part of the Extended tier assessment of IGCSE English as a Second Language
and tests the following Assessment Objectives:
AO1: Reading
R1 understand and respond to information presented in a variety of forms
R2 select and organise material relevant to specific purposes
R3 recognise, understand and distinguish between facts, ideas and opinions
R4 infer information from texts
AO2: Writing
W1 communicate clearly, accurately and appropriately
W2 convey information and express opinions effectively
W3 employ and control a variety of grammatical structures
W4 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of a range of appropriate vocabulary
W5 observe conventions of paragraphing, punctuation and spelling
W6 employ appropriate register/style
84
(b) 200–250 visitors per day / 1200 online fans / plans to increase the number of instructors
(d) they can’t talk to the divers / they can’t talk to them [1]
(h) see a film (of the indoor skydiving experience) / see the indoor skydiving experience / decide if it
is for you / book a lesson / book online
(i) they read a guide / they read (a book called) ‘Talking to the Media’
/ they read a book (in order) to speak to journalists [1]
TOWN/CITY INFORMATION
SECTION A
Country: France
SECTION B
Places of interest in the town/city (13th C/century) castle / art gallery OR home of famous
artist Michel Leboeuf / historic buildings (ANY TWO)
In the space below write one sentence of between 12 and 20 words, explaining why you chose this
particular town / city for your project.
The sentence must be written from the point of view of Giuseppe Morelli.
It is expected that the candidate will write a sentence with the following content:
I was attracted to this town because my father worked there as an art historian (and did some
research).
My father had done some research on the historic buildings in the town.
2 marks: no fewer than 12 and no more than 20 words; proper sentence construction; correct
spelling, punctuation and grammar; relevant to context.
1 mark: no fewer than 12 and no more than 20 words; proper sentence construction; 1–3 errors of
punctuation/spelling/grammar that do not obscure meaning; relevant to context.
Correct responses only apply if they are placed under the correct sub-heading (as detailed below).
Only one mark may be awarded per line.
Add the correct answers to give a total out of 8.
Remember that this exercise is marked for content (reading), not language.
What Costas can tell companies about water underground (max 3 marks this heading)
4 the quantity
5 the quality / the purity / whether it contains any salt
6 distinguish water from other liquids
7 the depth / how deep the water is
8 the direction of flow
Tools that Costas now uses to detect water (max 3 marks this heading)
9 rod with a loop at either end
10 (rod and) twig / small piece of wood
11 pendulum / weight on piece of string
Count words and indicate when the 120 word limit has been reached.
If candidate exceeds 120 words then a maximum of 3 marks can be awarded for language.
If only one aspect of the question is addressed, a maximum of 2 marks for language can be awarded.
Do not award language marks if there is no content to reward.
Content: up to 6 marks
0 marks: meaning obscure because of density of language errors and serious problems with
expression/nothing of relevance
2 marks: expression limited/some reliance on lifting from the original, but some sense of order
3 marks: expression good, with attempts to group and sequence ideas in own words
4 marks: expression very good; clear, orderly grouping and sequencing largely in own words
The following general instructions, and table of marking criteria, apply to both exercises.
• Content covers relevance (i.e. whether the piece fulfils the task and the awareness of
purpose/ audience/register) and the development of ideas (i.e. the detail/explanation
provided and how enjoyable it is to read).
• Language covers style (i.e. complexity of vocabulary and sentence structure) and accuracy
(of grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of paragraphs).
• When deciding on a mark for content or language, first of all decide which mark band is most
appropriate. There will not necessarily be an exact fit. Then decide between 2 marks within
that mark band. Use the lower mark if it only just makes it into the band and the upper mark if
it fulfils all the requirements of the band but doesn’t quite make it into the band above.
• When deciding on a mark for content, look at both relevance and development of ideas.
First ask yourself whether the writing fulfils the task, in terms of points to be covered and the
length. If it does, it will be in at least the 4–5 mark band.
• When deciding on a mark for language, look at both the style and the accuracy of the
language. A useful starting point would be first to determine whether errors intrude. If they do
not, it will be in at least the 4–5 mark band.
• The use of paragraphs should not be the primary basis of deciding which mark band the
work is in. Look first at the language used and once you have decided on the appropriate mark
band, you can use the paragraphing as a factor in helping you to decide whether the work
warrants the upper or lower mark in the mark band.
• If the essay is considerably shorter than the stated word length, it should be put in mark
band 2-3 for content or lower for not fulfilling the task.
• If the essay is totally irrelevant and has nothing to do with the question asked, it should be
given 0 marks for Content and Language, even if it is enjoyable to read and fluent.
• If the essay is partly relevant and therefore in mark band 2–3, the full range of marks for
language is available.
• Relevance: Fulfils the task, with • Style: Mainly simple structures and
reasonable attempt at appropriate vocabulary, sometimes attempting
register, and some sense of more sophisticated language.
purpose and audience. A • Accuracy: Meaning is clear, and
satisfactory attempt has been work is of a safe, literate standard.
made to address the topic, but Simple structures are generally
there may be digressions. sound, apart from infrequent
• Development of ideas: Material is spelling errors, which do not
satisfactorily developed at interfere with communication.
appropriate length. Grammatical errors occur when
more sophistication is attempted.
Paragraphs are used but without
coherence or unity.