1) The case involves a dispute over ownership of two lots between Jose and his nephews (Consuelo's children). Jose had been occupying the lots and had an agreement with Consuelo to purchase them, but she later cancelled the agreement.
2) The RTC dismissed Jose's complaint for failure to comply with Article 151 of the Family Code, which requires earnest efforts at compromise in suits between family members.
3) The Supreme Court ruled that Article 151 does not apply because Jose's nephews and their cousin Rene, who Consuelo sold the lots to, are not considered family members to Jose under the Family Code. Therefore, the requirement of showing efforts at compromise was not needed.
1) The case involves a dispute over ownership of two lots between Jose and his nephews (Consuelo's children). Jose had been occupying the lots and had an agreement with Consuelo to purchase them, but she later cancelled the agreement.
2) The RTC dismissed Jose's complaint for failure to comply with Article 151 of the Family Code, which requires earnest efforts at compromise in suits between family members.
3) The Supreme Court ruled that Article 151 does not apply because Jose's nephews and their cousin Rene, who Consuelo sold the lots to, are not considered family members to Jose under the Family Code. Therefore, the requirement of showing efforts at compromise was not needed.
1) The case involves a dispute over ownership of two lots between Jose and his nephews (Consuelo's children). Jose had been occupying the lots and had an agreement with Consuelo to purchase them, but she later cancelled the agreement.
2) The RTC dismissed Jose's complaint for failure to comply with Article 151 of the Family Code, which requires earnest efforts at compromise in suits between family members.
3) The Supreme Court ruled that Article 151 does not apply because Jose's nephews and their cousin Rene, who Consuelo sold the lots to, are not considered family members to Jose under the Family Code. Therefore, the requirement of showing efforts at compromise was not needed.
1) The case involves a dispute over ownership of two lots between Jose and his nephews (Consuelo's children). Jose had been occupying the lots and had an agreement with Consuelo to purchase them, but she later cancelled the agreement.
2) The RTC dismissed Jose's complaint for failure to comply with Article 151 of the Family Code, which requires earnest efforts at compromise in suits between family members.
3) The Supreme Court ruled that Article 151 does not apply because Jose's nephews and their cousin Rene, who Consuelo sold the lots to, are not considered family members to Jose under the Family Code. Therefore, the requirement of showing efforts at compromise was not needed.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1
WEEK05 #04 Moreno v Kahn No suit between members of the same family shall prosper unless it
G.R. No. 217744 | 30 July 2018 should appear from the verified complaint or petition that earnest By: DEL CASTILLO efforts toward a compromise have been made, but that the same have failed. If it is shown that no such efforts were in fact made, the case must be dismissed. This rule shall not apply to cases which may not be the Topic: The Family subject of compromise under the Civil Code.” Petitioner: Jose Z. Moreno Respondent: Rene M. Kahn, Consuelo Moreno Kahn-Haire, et al. In this relation, Article 150 of the Family Code provides that family Ponente: Perlas – Bernabe, J. relations include those: 1) Between husband and wife FACTS: 2) Between parents and children Jose (petitioner) and his family have been occupying two lots owned by 3) Among other ascendants and descendants; Consuelo, his full-blooded sister, and his nephews (collectively, 4) Among brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half blood. Respondents). In 2003, respondents offered to sell the subject lands to Consuelo for $200,000 ($120,000) to be received by Consuelo. Jose In this instance, Rene and Jose’s nephews being children of Consuelo, are accepted. In 2010, however, Consuelo decided to cancel their agreement “strangers” to Jose insofar as Article 151 of the Family Code is and thereafter informed Jose to convert the earlier partial payment as concerned. rental payments instead, to which Jose disagreed. In 2011,, without Jose’s consent, Consuelo et al, decided to sell their shares to Rene, son of Consuelo, thereby consolidating full ownership of the lots with him.Upon learning of such sale, Jose decided to bring the matter to the barangay upon for conciliation proceedings between him and Rene only. No settlement was agreed upon, thus Jose filed with the RTC for specific performance and for cancellation of titles. The RTC however, motu proprio ordered the dismissal of Jose’s complaint for failure to allege compliance with the provision of Art 151 of the Family Code. ISSUE: Does Article 151 apply in this case? RULING: No. For Article 151 of the Family Code to apply, the suit must exclusively be between or among members of the same Family. Once a stranger becomes a party to such suit, the earnest effort requirement is no longer a condition precedent before the action can prosper Article 151 of the Family Code states:
