Extinguishment of Obligations
Extinguishment of Obligations
Extinguishment of Obligations
1. By payment or performance
2. By the loss of thing due
3. By the condonation or remission of the debt
4. By the confusion or merger of the rights of creditor and debtor
5. By compensation
6. By novation
7. Other causes of extinguishment of obligations, such as annulment, rescission,
fulfillment of a resolutory condition, and prescription, are governed elsewhere in this
Code (1156a)
TIME OF PAYMENT
-The payment or performance must be on the date stipulated (may be made even on
Sundays or any holiday, although some, like the Negotiable Instruments Law, states that
payment in such case may be made on the next succeeding business day)
- The burden of proving that the obligation has been extinguished by payment devolves
upon the debtor who offers such a defense to the claim of the plaintiff creditor
- The issuance of receipt is a consequence of usage and good faith which must be observed
(although our Code has no provision on this) and the refusal of the creditor to issue a
receipt without cause is a ground for consignation under Art. 1256
- The debtor is not released from liability by a payment to one who is not the creditor nor
one authorized to receive the payment, even if the debtor believed in good faith that he
is the creditor, except to the extent the payment inured to the benefit of the creditor
- In addition to those mentioned above, payment to a third person releases the debtor:
o When, without notice of the assignment of credit, he pays to the original creditor
o When in good faith he pays to one in possession of the credit
- Even when the creditor receives, no benefit from the payment to a third person, he
cannot demand payment anew, if the mistake of the debtor was due to the fault of the
creditor
ART. 1244. The debtor of a thing cannot compel the creditor to receive a different one,
although the latter may be of the same value as, or more valuable than that which is due. In
obligations to do or not to do, an act or forbearance cannot be substituted by another act
or forbearance against the obligee’s will. (1166a)
EXAMPLE: D owes C P15,000.00. To fulfi ll the obligation, D, with the consent of C, delivers a
piano. If the piano, however, is worth less than P15,000.00, the conveyance must be
deemed to extinguish the obligation to the extent only of the value of the piano as agreed
or as may be proved, unless the parties have considered the piano by their agreement,
express or implied, as full payment in which case the obligation of D is totally extinguished.
The conveyance is, in effect, a novation of the contract. (see Art. 1291[1].)
ART. 1246. When the obligation consists in the delivery of an indeterminate or generic
thing, whose quality and circumstances have not been stated, the creditor cannot demand a
thing of superior quality. Neither can the debtor deliver a thing of inferior quality. The
purpose of the obligation and other circumstances shall be taken into consideration.
(1167a)
ART. 1239. In obligations to give, payment made by one who does not have the free
disposal of the thing due and capacity to alienate it shall not be valid, without
prejudice to the provisions of Article 1427 under the Title on “Natural Obligations.’’
(1160a)
B. Payment maybe made by a third person, but the creditor is not bound to accept if the
third person who has no interest in the fulfillment of the obligation, unless there is a
stipulation to the contrary (Art. 1236)
ART. 1236. The creditor is not bound to accept payment or performance by a third
person who has no interest in the fulfi llment of the obligation, unless there is a
stipulation to the contrary. Whoever pays for another may demand from the debtor
what he has paid, except that if he paid without the knowledge or against the will of
the debtor, he can recover only insofar as the payment has been benefi cial to the
debtor. (1158a)
ART. 1237. Whoever pays on behalf of the debtor without the knowledge or against
the will of the latter, cannot compel the creditor to subrogate him in his rights, such as
those arising from a mortgage, guaranty, or penalty. (1159a)
ART. 1238. Payment made by a third person who does not intend to be reimbursed by
the debtor is deemed to be a donation, which requires the debtor’s consent. But the
payment is in any case valid as to the creditor who has accepted it. (n)
C. Payment shall be made to the person in whose favor the obligation has been
constituted, or his successor in interest, or any person authorized to receive it
(Art.1240)
ART. 1240. Payment shall be made to the person in whose favor the obligation has
been constituted, or his successor in interest, or any person authorized to receive it.
(1162a)
ART. 1241. Payment to a person who is incapacitated to administer his property shall
be valid if he has kept the thing delivered, or insofar as the payment has been benefi
cial to him. Payment made to a third person shall also be valid insofar as it has
redounded to the benefi t of the creditor. Such benefi t to the creditor need not be
proved in the following cases: (1) If after the payment, the third person acquires the
creditor’s rights; (2) If the creditor ratifi es the payment to the third person; (3) If by
the creditor’s conduct, the debtor has been led to believe that the third person had
authority to receive the payment. (1163a)
D. Payment made in good faith to any person in possession of the credit shall release the
debtor (Art.1242)
ART. 1242. Payment made in good faith to any person in possession of the credit shall
release the debtor. (1164)
B.) CESSION (Art. 1255): the assignment by the debtor of all his property in favor of his
creditors. Contemplates the existence of two or more creditors and involves the
assignment of all the debtor’s property
ART. 1255. The debtor may cede or assign his property to his creditors in payment of
his debts. This cession, unless there is stipulation to the contrary, shall only release
the debtor from responsibility for the net proceeds of the thing assigned. The
agreements which, on the effect of the cession, are made between the debtor and his
creditors shall be governed by special laws. (1175a)
C.) TENDER AND CONSIGNATION
Tender of Payment: the antecedent of consignation, that is, an act preparatory to the
consignation which is the principal and from which are derived the immediate
consequence which the debtor desires or seeks to obtain. Tender, may be extrajudicial
while consignation is necessarily judicial
THE EFFECTS OF CONSIGNATION
1. The debtor is released in the same manner as if he had performed the obligation at the
time of the consignation because this produces the same effect as a valid payment
2. The accrual of interest on the obligation is suspended from the moment of consignation
3. The deteriorations or loss of the thing or amount consigned occurring without fault of
the debtor must be borne by the creditor, because the risks of the thing are transferred
to the creditor from the moment of deposit
4. Any increment or increase in value of the thing after the consignation inures to the
benefit of the creditor
When the amount consigned does not cover the entire obligation, the creditor may
accept it, reserving his right to the balance. If no reservations are made, the acceptance
by the creditor of the amount consigned may be regarded as a waive or further claims
under the contract
SPECIAL REQUISITES OF CONSIGNATION
1. There was a debt due
2. The consignation of the obligation was made because of some legal cause provided in
the present article
3. That previous notice of the consignation has been given to persons interested in the
performance of the obligation
4. The amount or thing due was placed at the disposal of the court
5. After the consignation had been made the persons interested had been notified thereof
APPLICATION OF PAYMENT
It is the designation of the debt to which payment shall be applied when the debtor owes
several debts in favor of the same creditor (Art. 1252)
ART. 1252. He who has various debts of the same kind in favor of one and the same creditor,
may declare at the time of making the payment, to which of them the same must be applied.
Unless the parties so stipulate, or when the application of payment is made by the party for
whose benefi t the term has been constituted, application shall not be made as to debts
which are not yet due. If the debtor accepts from the creditor a receipt in which an
application of the payment is made, the former cannot complain of the same, unless there is
a cause for invalidating the contract. (1172a)
Requisites:
1. 1 debtor and 1 creditor only
2. 2 or more debts of the same kind
3. All debts must be due
4. Amount paid by the debtor must not be sufficient to cover the total amount of all the
debts
It is necessary that the obligations must all be due. Exceptions:
1. When there is a stipulation to the contrary; and
2. The application of payment is made by the party for whose benefit the term or period
has been constituted (Relate to Art. 1196)
It is also necessary that all the debts be for the same kind, generally of a monetary character.
This includes obligations which were not originally of a monetary character, but at the time of
application of payment, had been converted into an obligation to pay damages by reason of
breach or nonperformance
If the debtor makes a proper application of payment but the creditor refuses to accept it
because he wants to apply it to another debt, such creditor will incur in delay
COMPENSATION VS PAYMENT
In compensation, there can be partial extinguishment of the obligation; in payment, the
performance must be completer, unless waived by the creditor. Payment involves delivery of
action, while compensation (legal compensation) takes place by operation of law without
simultaneous delivery.
COMPENSATION VS MERGER
In compensation, there are at least two persons who stand as principal creditors and debtor of
each other, in merger, there is only one person involved in whom the characters of creditor and
debtor are merged. In merger, there is only one obligation, while in compensation, there ae
two obligations involved.
DELEGACION: The debtor initiates the substitution, which requires consent of all parties
(original debtor, creditor, new debtor)
NOVATION
- The extinguishment of an obligation by a substitution or change of the obligation by a
subsequent one which extinguishes or modifies the first either by:
1. Changing the object or principal conditions
2. By substituting the person of the debtor
3. Subrogating a third person in the rights of the creditor
- Novation- is a juridical act of dual function. At the time it extinguishes an obligation it
creates a new one in lieu of the old
CLASSIFICATION OF NOVATION
AS TO NATURE:
1. SUBJECT OR PERSONAL- either passive or active. Passive if there is substitution of the
debtor. Active if a third person is subrogated in the rights of the creditor
2. OBJECTIVE OR REAL- substitution of the object with another or changing the principal
conditions
AS TO FORM:
1. EXPRESS- parties declare that the old obligation is substituted by the new
2. IMPLIED- an incompatibility exists between the old and the new obligation that cannot
stand together
AS TO EFFECT:
1. PARTIAL- when there is only a modification or change in some principal condition of the
obligation
2. TOTAL-when the old obligation is completely extinguished
REQUISITES OF NOVATION
1. A previous valid obligations
2. Agreement of all parties
3. Extinguishment of the old contracy- may be express or implied
4. Validity of the new one
SUBROGATION: THE CHANGE OF CREDITORS
- It transfers to the person subrogated, the credit and all rights appertaining to the ld
creditor, either against (1) the debtor or (2) third persons, who may be guarantors,
mortgagors, subject to the stipulation in conventional subrogation ( Art.1291).
Subrogation is the transfer of all rights of the creditor to a third person, who substitutes
him in all his rights. It may either be legal or conventional.
CONVENTIONAL SUBROGATION (Art.1300)- takes place by agreement of the parties;
hence; consent of old and new creditors and debtor is necessary (Art. 1303)