Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Organisations Structures and Systems: Ashutosh Murti

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Organisations Structures

and Systems
Ashutosh Murti
ashutosh@iimshillong.ac.in
Figure 4.1 - Design Challenge

4-6
Figure 4.1 - Design Challenge
(cont.)

4-7
Figure 4.1: Design Challenge
(cont.)

4-8
Figure 4.1 - Design Challenge
(cont.)

4-9
Figure 4.1 - Design Challenge
(cont.)

4-10
Figure 4.2 - Building Blocks of
Differentiation

4-14
Figure 4.3 - Organizational
Chart of the B.A.R. and Grille

4-20
Mechanistic Vs. Organic Structures

Mechanistic Organic

• High formalization • Low formalization

• Narrow span of control • Wide span of control

• High centralization • Low centralization


MECHANISTIC VERSUS ORGANIC DESIGNS:
A bird’s eye view

Structure
Dimension Mechanistic Organic

Stability Change unlikely Change likely

Specialization Many specialists Many generalists

Formal rules Rigid rules Considerable flexibility

Authority Centralized in Decentralized, diffused


few top people throughout the
organization
Elements of Organizational Structure

Department- Span of
alization Control

Organizational
Structure
Elements

Formalization Centralization
The Four Key Design Decisions

Specialization
Division of Labor:
High Low

Basis
Departmentalization:
Homogeneous Heterogeneous

Number
Span of Control:
Few Many

Delegation
Authority:
High Low
Factors Affecting Organizational Structure
Formal and Informal Organisations

• Both Formal and informal organizations co-exist in any


organizational structure. They basically define the path of
communication and mode of information sharing and are part
of a whole organization. They may share common or divergent
goals.
• The formal organization is the defined set-up of roles for the
achievement of organizational goals and objectives.
• Informal organizations are formed by employees, without any
formal goals or objectives.
Tall versus Flat Organizations: Comparison
Chief
Executive
Tall hierarchy

Relatively narrow
Chief span of control
Executive
Flat hierarchy

Relatively wide
span of control
Forces For (De)centralization

Centralization

• Organizational crises
• Management desire for control
• Increase consistency, reduce costs

• Complexity — size, diversity


• Desire for empowerment

Decentralization
Decentralization: Benefits
When Low And When High

Low Decentralization High decentralization


(High centralization) (low centralization)
Eliminates the additional respon- Can eliminate levels of management,
sibility not desired by people making a leaner organization
performing routine jobs

Permits crucial decisions to be Promotes greater opportunities for


made by individuals who have decisions to be made by people closest
the “big picture” to problems
Integrating Mechanisms

Simple 1.Hierarchy of authority specifies reporting relationships.


2.Direct contact requires managers from different functions to meet
to coordinate activities.
3.Liaison role requires a manager to coordinate with other subunit
managers.
4.Task forces create a temporary cross-functional committee.
5.Teams require different functional managers to coordinate
activities.
6.Integrating roles coordinate two or more functions or divisions.
Complex 7.Integrating departments coordinate functions or divisions.
4 Organizational Design Challenges That
Most Leaders Misdiagnose

• Symptom: Competing priorities


Common Design Challenge: Poor governance

• Symptom: Unwanted turnover


Common Design Challenge: Bad role design

• Symptom: Inaccessible bosses


Common Design Challenge: Excessive spans of control

• Symptom: Cross-functional rivalry


Common design challenge: Misaligned incentives or metrics

You might also like