Assignment 2
Assignment 2
Assignment 2
In her article The Impormptu That Trod on a Loaf: Or How Music Tells Stories,
Susan McClary talks about how music as an art form contains a very important narrative
element. She states that the period that encompasses the 1700s – 1900s is the most
narrative-oriented period in the history of Western Music. She also makes clear that the
narrative elements in music don’t behave like the narrative elements in literature.
Op. 90 No.2 in E flat Major. Her main point is that this piece contains a very strong
narrative structure. One of the elements that denotes the narrative structure (or the story-
telling structure) would be the minor-mode ending (E flat minor), which acts as the
horrible fate that comes to the innocent and naïve little tune of the beginning (She
makes a comparison to Anderson’s short story The Little Girl who Troad on a Loaf).
Another important narrative element would be the instances where the main line hangs
in the upper register before the innocent tune comes back again, as in mm. 50-52.
McClary compares this to similar effects in movie soundtracks that are employed to
emphasize upcoming events and in a way invite us to wonder about the possible
fact, speaking from the point of view of a pianist, such an analysis is of great interest to
any performer. The main point that I value about her analysis is her overall structural
narrative idea of the Impromptu. As McClary explains, the piece is in an unusual ternary
form, since we have a return of B in a slightly modified form, being thus the overall
structure: ABAB1. I agree with McClary’s idea that the A section represents this idea of
innocence and naivety, while the B section is tragic, crude and represents the inevitable
fatality of destiny. This idea of hers makes absolute sense and is strongly justified by
the music theory behind it. For instance, the A section isn’t innocent because it simply
sounds that way, but because the melody “burbles along in weightless triplets, easily
flowing through the gamut from high to low, then effortlessly springing back up to the
higher range again. So secure is it that it repeats itself twice with ever greater
confident of its tonal identity: its harmonies never deviate during the first twenty-four
bars from the primary chords required for key orientation” (McClary 26). I must say
that there is only one point where I don’t fully agree with McClary. This is when she
talks about narrative. Meaning, she never gives a clear definition of what narrative is.
When speaking about renaissance music, she mentions in page 21 how music before the
1700s doesn’t “do anything I would classify as narrative within the music itself.”
Instead of narrative, I am keener to think in terms of the melos of a piece. The greek
word melos from “Melo-día” is the conductive thread that drives the music from
formed and conceived polyphonically, something that starts changing from the 1700s.
From this point on, the melos starts to be conceived purely melodically, but the melos is
still there. For example, I would argue that the B theme of a classical sonata arouse from
the countersubject of fugues and other polyphonic settings of music before the 1700s.
comes after the main subject, and it makes since, since the fathers of the classical sonata
were all expert contrapuntists. Thus, instead of a narrative, I would tend to prefer to
think in terms of a melos; a melos that perfectly exists in the Renaissance. What we see
in the 1700s is the beginning of the melodification of the melos, which is treated in an