Research Article [Kukde et al.

, 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]

CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & LIFE SCIENCES
(Int. J. of Pharm. Life Sci.)
Comparative Study on Formulation and Development of
Promethazine Hydrochloride Hydrogel and Organogel
Deepshikha Kukde1*, Deepti Mishra1, Kamini Sahu2 and Vimukta Sharma1
1, BM College of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Indore, (M.P.) - India
2, Govt. Kalaniketan Polytechnic College, Jabalpur, (M.P.) - India

Abstract
Promethazine Hydrochloride (PMH) is a phenothiazine derivative that act as an anti-histaminic, it has sedative, anti-
motion-sickness, anti-emetic, and anti-cholinergic effects. The most preferred dosage forms of PMH are oral tablets,
injections, syrups, linctuses, suspension, elixirs, and suppositories, in order to overcome the disadvantages of these
dosage forms there is a need of a new formulation in the form of topical hydrogel. The drug is formulated as topical
hydrogel preparation by using Carbopol 934 that could be applied for site-specific drug delivery additional to this by
using soya lecithin organogel was also formulated for comparative studies. Different studies were conducted and
discussed to successfully formulate the dosage form. The results including drug content and drug release pattern and
stability studies showed that the drug can be formulated both as hydrogel and organogel.
Key-Words: Promethazine Hydrochloride, Hydrogel, Soya lecithin, Carbopol 934, Organogel
Introduction
Semi-solid formulation in all their diversity dominate Promethazine Hydrochloride (PMH) is a phenothiazine
the system for topical delivery, but foams, spray, derivative that competitively and potently blocks
medicated powders, solution, and even medicated histamine H1 receptors without blocking the secretion
adhesive systems are in use.1 gels are relatively newer of histamine and act as an anti-histaminic, it has
classes of dosage forms created by entrapment of large sedative, anti-motion-sickness, anti-emetic, and anti-
amount of aqueous or hydroalcoholic liquid in a cholinergic effects. The drug competitively and
network of colloidal solid particles. Gel formulation reversibly antagonize the effects of histamine at the H1-
generally provides faster drug release compared with receptor site on effector cells which are responsible for
ointments and creams.2,3 Hydrogels are three- vasodilatation, increased capillary permeability, flare
dimentional, water-swollen structures composed of and itch reaction in the skin, and to some extent for
mainly hydrophillic homopolymers or co-polymers. contraction of smooth muscle in the bronchi and
Hydrophilic gels called hydrogels are cross-linked gastrointestinal tract.
materials absorbing large quantities of water without Material and Methods
dissolving. Softness, smartness, and the capacity to Promethazine Hydrochloride was received as a gift
store water make hydrogels unique materials. 4,5 sample by Cyno Pharma, Indore. Preformulation study
Organogel, a viscoelastic system, can be regarded as a was done initially and results directed for the further
semi-solid preparation, which has an immobilized course of formulation. Identification was done by UV,
external apolar phase. The apolar phase gets IR, melting point and chemical test.
immobilized within spaces of the three-dimensional Preparation method:
networked structure formed due to the physical Experimental Design: The Hit and Trial method of
interactions amongst the self assembled structures of experimental design was selected to investigate the
compounds regarded as gelators. The three- effect of different parameters on the mean and variance
dimensional networked structure, hence formed, of the process performance and to obtain an optimal,
prevents the flow of external apolar phase. Some well-functioning process. It can be methodical in
common examples of gelators include sterol, sorbitan manipulating the variables in an attempt to sort through
monostearate, and lecithin and cholesteryl possibilities that may result in success. To find the best
anthraquinone derivates. 6 solution, one finds all solutions by the method just
described and then comparatively evaluates them based
* Corresponding Author upon some predefined set of criteria, the existence of
E.mail: deepshikha.kukde@gmail.com
© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS
4845
Research Article [Kukde et al., 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]
CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
which is a condition for the possibility of finding an continuous stirring. To the above mixture the weighed
optimal quality best product. quantities of disodium EDTA, propyl paraben and
The data analysis was done on the basis of parameters methyl paraben were added sequentially. To the
viz, appearance, gelling (rigidity), viscosity and drug obtained viscous solution measured volume of
release study. On the basis of these sequential analyses propylene glycol and ethanol were added. Then
one optimized batch was selected for further required quantity of drug was mixed in water as drug
formulation. solution, drug solution was added to the final
Method for hydrogel with drug homogeneous mixture and triethanolamine was added
The required quantity of carbopol was taken in a to adjust the pH between 6 and 7. 7
beaker which was then mixed with water with
Table No.1 Formulation of gel
S. No. Ingredients Formulation code (%)
(% weight)

HG1 HG2 HG3 HG4 HG5 HG6

1 Carbopol-934 0.5 0.7 1 1.2 1.5 1.8

2 Propylene Glycol 15 15 15 15 15 15

3 Disodium EDTA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

4 Propyl Paraben 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

5 Methyl Paraben 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

6 Ethanol 1 1 1 1 1 1

7 Promethazine HCl 1 1 1 1 1 1

8 Triethanolamine q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s.

9 Distilled Water q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s.

water (aqueous base) was added drop wise with the
Method for organogel help of microsyringe to form organogel. To this
Required quantity of lecithin was dissolved in glyceryl triethanolamine was added for adjustment of pH
monostearate as a solvent obtained by previous between 6 and 7.7,8
heating. Lecithin was dissolved in the solvent at
continuous stirring until homogeneity. To this tween 80
and propylene glycol were added. 1% drug solution in
Table No. 2 Formulation of organogel
S. No. Ingredients Formulation Code
(% weight)

OG1 OG2 OG3

1 Soya lecithin 7 10 15

2 Glyceryl monostearate 10 10 10

3 Propylene glycol 15 15 15

© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS

4846
 Research Article [Kukde et al., 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]
CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
4 Disodium EDTA 0.1 0.1 0.1

5 Propyl paraben 0.01 0.01 0.01

6 Methyl paraben 0.05 0.05 0.05

7 Tween-80 1 1 1

8 Triethanolamine q.s. q.s. q.s.

9 Distilled water q.s q.s q.s

Evaluation Parameters for Optimization bathing solution in the receptor compartment. The
All gel formulations were subjected to analysis on the cellophane membrane was mounted between the donor
basis of appearance, viscosity, consistency and drug and receiver compartments of the diffusion cell. The
release studies. From these studies an optimized donor cell was filled with 1 g of gel. The receiver
formulation batch was selected. The parameters medium is continuously agitated with a magnetic stirrer
analyzed are as follows: 9,10 at a temperature of 370C ± 20C maintained
Appearance thermostatically. Samples 1ml in each case was
The gels were analyzed on physical basis. They were withdrawn at regular intervals and fresh receptor fluid
checked for their color, gelling (rigidity), and overall was added to maintain a constant volume of receptor
elegancy fluid. The sample withdrawn from the receptor
Viscosity determination compartment was then analyzed
Viscosity of different formulation was measured using spectrophotometrically at 250 nm and the drug content
Brookfield Viscometer [DV-E (RV), USA]. Viscosity was determined from the calibration curve .
was determined by using spindle number-06;
viscometer was set at 10 RPM. The viscosity of
different formulation was measured.
Drug diffusion studies
The drug diffusion studies of prepared gel were carried
out in Franz diffusion cell using through a dialysis
membrane. Phosphate buffer 6.8 solution was used as
Table No.3 Drug release studies of hydrogel formulations
S. No. Time Cumulative % drug release
(hrs)

HG1 HG2 HG3 HG4 HG5 HG6

1 1 16.44±0.20 14.98±1.36 12.28±0.66 11.28±0.78 10.21±0.43 10.09±1.44

2 2 21.91±0.44 22.89±2.28 21.29±0.96 18.52±0.95 16.35±1.22 15.88±1.44

3 3 28.68±0.37 31.01±2.10 30.16±0.38 26.15±1.68 24.55±0.69 23.26±1.19

4 4 46.40±1.88 43.80±1.31 42.95±1.00 38.19±1.81 35.68±1.74 32.11±1.13

5 5 57.05±1.72 52.44±1.54 49.58±0.69 48.06±1.60 46.21±1.82 45.59±1.42

6 6 65.58±1.32 60.89±0.99 60.19±0.80 58.59±1.06 54.52±0.94 52.67±0.47

All values are mean ± S.D for n=3; HG=Hydrogel formulation

© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS

4847
Research Article [Kukde et al., 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]
CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
Table No.4 Drug release studies of organogel formulation
S. No. Time Cumulative % drug release
(hrs)

OG1 OG2 OG3

1 1 18.45±0.81 15.81±1.43 13.53±0.51

2 2 28.61±1.58 21.82±1.76 20.58±1.36

3 3 36.18±1.69 38.11±1.62 35.61±1.85

4 4 46.21±2.15 44.32±2.14 43.26±1.39

5 5 59.25±1.84 58.28±1.36 55.61±1.15

6 6 69.81±1.38 64.92±2.24 60.82±1.71

All values are mean ± S.D for n=3 OG=Organogel formulation

based system in which the hydrogel polymers play an
The optimization of hydrogel and organogel was done important role in formation of hydrogel based gel in
on the basis of experimental design. On the basis of contrast to these hydrogel system organogel is two
combined data of appearance, gelling, elegancy, phase system- one is organic phase and other is
viscosity and % drug release HG3 formulation was aqueous phase in which gelling is induced by addition
selected as the optimized formulation and final of water as aqueous. From all the studies of these
formulation was prepared with respective systems we had much parameter on the basis of which
concentrations for further evaluations. we can compare hydrogel with that of organogel
On the basis of combined results of appearance, formulations.
gelling, elegancy, viscosity and % drug release OG2 On The Basis of evaluation parameters
was selected as the optimized batch for further Both the gel formulations that are hydrogel and
evaluation parameters. organogel were first compared for their physical
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HYDROGEL WITH parameters such as color, appearance, ease of
ORGANOGEL application, viscosity and spreadibility. For the
Hydrogel system differs with that of organogel system comparison optimal values were selected from the
in various ways as both system prepared with different evaluation parameters. All these are mentioned in the
components and methods. Hydrogel is fully water table (Table No.5).
Table No.5 Comparative study of gels on the basis of evaluation parameters
S. No. Evaluation parameters Formulations code

HG3 OG2

1 Color Transparent Creamy yellow

2 Greasiness Non-greasy Greasy

3 Viscosity (cps) 18274±675.62 20519 ±837.95

4 Speadibility (gm.cm/sec) 20.33 ± 0.41 16.87 ± 0.60

All values are mean ± S.D for n=3 HG,OG=Gel formulation

© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS

4848
 Research Article [Kukde et al., 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]
CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
On The Basis of Flux The slope of the linear portion of the plot was
The mean cumulative amount of drug diffused per unit calculated as flux Jss (μg/cm2/hr) (Table no. 6).
surface area of the membrane was plotted versus time.
Table No. 6 Comparative study of gels on the basis of flux
S. No. Formulation Code Flux (μg/cm2/hr)

1 HG3 9.818±0.59

2 OG2 11.58±0.78

HG,OG=Gel formulation
On The Basis of Stability Studies stability studies and the values and observations
On the basis of stability studies, this was done as recorded were used as the basis of comparison in
accelerated stability testing according to ICH guideline between hydrogel and organogel formulations. The
previously, both the gel formulations were subjected to comparative studies are tabulated (Table No 7.)
Table No. 7 Comparative Study of Gels by Stability Study

S. No. Evaluation parameters HG3 OG2

Before(0 Day ) After(60 Day) Before(0 Day) After(60 Day)

1 Viscosity (cps) 18274±675.62 18542±307.51 20519±837.95 16982±586.48

2 pH 6.82±0.03 6.78±0.03 6.81±0.05 6.32±0.07

3 Homogeneity +++ ++ +++ +

4 Drug Content 98.65%±0.54 97.89%±0.69 97.48%±1.07 93.41%±1.07

Where, all values are mean ± S.D for n =3; (+)- Poor, (++)- Good, (+++)- Excellent (Stability study was conducted at
400C ± 20C/75% ± 5% relative humidity)
Results and Discussion ranges were within the acceptable limit for topical
Various observations and calculations were done for formulations therefore both the gel formulations were
optimized formulations on different evaluation acceptable for pH values.
parameters such as viscosity, spreadibility, pH, The viscosity range of the gel formulations was
homogeneity, grittiness, drug content, and drug determined; the viscosity of hydrogel formulation
diffusion. Homogeneity was observed with the help of (HG3) was 18274 cps, and that of organogel
visual basis which showed good homogeneity in both formulation (OG2) was 20519 cps. Viscosity values
the gel formulations that is HG3, OG2. Both the gels were within acceptable range.
were found to be free from any lumps or any The spreadibilty was measured on the basis of slip and
aggregates and were elegant. drag approach. The spreadibility of hydrogel
Formulations were evaluated microscopically and also formulation (HG3) was 20.33 gm.cm/sec, and that of
by feel on application. For the presence of particles if organogel formulation (OG2) was 16.87 gm.cm/sec.
any, no appreciable particulate matter was seen under More the value of spreadibility more easily and quickly
light microscope. No foreign particulate particles were the gel can be applied.
observed and were smoothly applicable. Hence gel The drug content of the formulations that is hydrogel
preparations fulfill the requirement of freedom from (HG3) and organogel (OG2) was determined as 98.65%
particular matter and from grittiness as desired for any and 97.48% respectively. The drug content was within
topical preparation. the limits in both the formulations.
pH was determined by Digital pH meter. Hydrogel Drug diffusion studies were done by using an egg
formulation (HG3) showed pH range of 6.79 and that of membrane for a period of 6 hrs which was calculated
organogel formulation (OG2) was 6.71. These pH as cumulative percent drug release that showed

© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS

4849
Research Article [Kukde et al., 6(12): Dec, 2015:4845-4850]
CODEN (USA): IJPLCP ISSN: 0976-7126
56.860% for hydrogel (HG3) and 65.088% organogel allergic conditions. PMH hydrogel preparation was
(OG2). The drug release pattern and values of both the found to be acceptable, elegant and more patient
gels concluded that the release rate from that of compliance than other dosage form of this drug.
organogel is more as compared to that of hydrogel. References
Stability studies were done to check the stability of 1. Surver C, Davis FA. Bioavailability and
dosage form for its drug potency, any changes at the bioequivalence, in walter ka dermatological
physical and chemical basis. By following WHO-ICH and transdermal formulation edition. Marcel
guidelines both gel formulations were kept in Dekker, Inc. Newyork. 2002: 323,326, 327,
accelerated stability conditions at 40ºC ± 2ºC/ 75% 403.
RH± 5% for a period of 60 days and studied for 2. Kaur PL, Garg R, Gupta GD. Topical gels: a
appearance, pH, viscosity and drug content. In case of review. Res J Pharm and Tech. 2010; 3(1): 17-
hydrogel formulations (HG3) the viscosity determined 24.
was 18542 cps, pH was 6.78, appearance was 3. Kumar L, Verma R. In-vitro evaluation of
acceptable and good and the drug content was 97.89%. topical gel prepared using natural polymer. Int
This result showed that the hydrogel formulation was J Drug Dev. 2010; 2: 58-63.
stable at accelerated stability conditions as there were 4. Ratner DB. Biomaterials science. Second
very slight changes in the observations. While in case Edition. John Wiley & Sons. 1999: 397-406.
of organogel formulation (OG2) the viscosity shifted 5. Chandira RM, Pradeep, Pasupathi A,
from the initial value to 16982 cps, pH was 6.31, Bhowmik D, Chiranjib, Jayakar B, Tripathi
appearance and gelling was poor and drug content KK, Sampath Kumar KP. Design,
decreased to 93.41%. This suggested that organogel developmant and formulation of antiacne
formulation was not stable at accelerated stability dermatological gel. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010;
conditions. 2(1): 401-414.
Conclusion 6. Tanaka T. Gels. Sci Am. 1981; 244: 110-123.
On the basis of all these studies it can be concluded 7. Patil DK, Bakliwal RS, Pawar PS. Organogel:
that topical hydrogel formulation of PMH can be topical and transdermal drug delivery system.
successfully prepared with the help of polymer Int J Pharm Res and Dev. 2011; 3(6): 58-66.
carbopol-934. Its organogel can also be prepared 8. Shaikh IM, Jadhav SL, Jadhav KR, Kadam
successfully with lecithin as an organogelator. As VJ, Pisal SS. Aceclofenac organogel: in-vitro
organogel was prepared for the comparative studies of and in-vivo characterization. Cur Drug Dev.
both the preparations it could be concluded that 2009; 6: 1-7.
hydrogel are more stable in accelerated stability 9. Ansel HC, Loy AV, Popovich NG.
conditions at 40ºC ± 2ºC/ 75% RH ± 5%. From the Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug
drug release profile it is also concluded that hydrogel delivery systems. Eight edition. Lippincott
preparation could be used for local or site specific Williams and Wilkins publication. 2004: 418.
delivery of drug. Thus hydrogel of PMH could be 10. Capkova Z, Vitkova Z, Subova M.
better formulated and used commercially with various Formulation of loratidine into hydrogel. Acta
advantages over other dosage form. It could be used Facultatis Pharmaceuticae Universitatis
topically for site-specific drug delivery for any Comenianae. 2005; 52: 73-78.
conditions of pruritus, insect bite induced urticaria or

How to cite this article

Kukde D., Mishra D., Sahu K. and Sharma V. (2015). Comparative Study on Formulation and Development of
Promethazine Hydrochloride Hydrogel and Organogel. Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci., 6(12):4845-4850.
Source of Support: Nil; Conflict of Interest: None declared
Received: 01.11.15; Revised: 01.12.15; Accepted: 05.12.15

© Sakun Publishing House (SPH): IJPLS

4850