Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 94 views

    1 SL Ia BM Examiner

    Uploaded by

    api-529669983
    This document provides examiner comments on an internal assessment for an IB student. The assessment received a total of 22 out of 25 marks. The examiner felt the assessment deserved a level 7 and only minor aspects could have been improved, particularly for criterion B. While some criteria like A, C, and E could have potentially scored higher, the examiner agreed with the teacher's marks. Overall, it was a very good internal assessment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    1 SL Ia BM Examiner

    Uploaded by

    api-529669983
    94 views2 pages
    This document provides examiner comments on an internal assessment for an IB student. The assessment received a total of 22 out of 25 marks. The examiner felt the assessment deserved a level 7 and only minor aspects could have been improved, particularly for criterion B. While some criteria like A, C, and E could have potentially scored higher, the examiner agreed with the teacher's marks. Overall, it was a very good internal assessment.

    Original Title

    1 sl ia bm examiner

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides examiner comments on an internal assessment for an IB student. The assessment received a total of 22 out of 25 marks. The examiner felt the assessment deserved a level 7 and only minor aspects could have been improved, particularly for criterion B. While some criteria like A, C, and E could have potentially scored higher, the examiner agreed with the teacher's marks. Overall, it was a very good internal assessment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    94 views2 pages

    1 SL Ia BM Examiner

    Uploaded by

    api-529669983
    This document provides examiner comments on an internal assessment for an IB student. The assessment received a total of 22 out of 25 marks. The examiner felt the assessment deserved a level 7 and only minor aspects could have been improved, particularly for criterion B. While some criteria like A, C, and E could have potentially scored higher, the examiner agreed with the teacher's marks. Overall, it was a very good internal assessment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Internal assessment SL, sample A

    Examiner comments

    Assessment criteria Marks awarded Marks available

    Criterion A 4 4

    Criterion B 4 5

    Criterion C 4 5

    Criterion D 3 3

    Criterion E 3 4

    Criterion F 2 2

    Criterion G 2 2

    Total 22 25
    A very good SL IA that is clearly worth a level 7. Only minor aspects could have been better
    (especially for B).

    Criterion A – Supporting documents


    The five supporting documents are all recent and relevant, they are sufficiently in-depth and from a
    range of sources. The views they present are arguably varied enough to justify 4 marks; the teacher
    had awarded “only 3” but did not explain why (there was no comment and annotation on the IA); the
    moderator decided to raise this mark from 3 to 4 as it is not clear what else could have been
    provided here, for example what sort of other SD would have been needed to score higher.

    Criterion B – Choice and application of tools, techniques and theories


    A range of tools and concepts that are very well applied, notably SWOT and ratios; only minor
    aspects could have been better (for 5 marks), such as a) comparison over some years for some of
    the ratios in order to identify trends or patterns, or b) some inaccuracies in the SWOT where some
    opportunities are internal.

    Criterion C – Use and analysis of data and integration of ideas


    To quote the descriptor for 4 marks: “There is an appropriate selection of data from the supporting
    documents with good analysis and some integration of ideas.” A mark of 5 could have been
    considered by the teacher, who nonetheless did not do so; the moderator’s job is to agree with the
    teacher’s marks unless they have strong reasons to disagree, which is not the case here, so 4
    stayed unchanged.

    Criterion D – Conclusions
    The conclusion page 9 answers the question very clearly, recapping the key points without adding
    new elements.

    Criterion E – Evaluation
    There is evidence of evaluation all along (for example in the section “customer and competition
    analysis” on page 8: “the risk is enhanced by… this is due to…”). The teacher awarded 3 and the
    moderator agreed, although a mark of 4 could have been considered.

    Criterion F – Structure
    Logical structure, easy to follow.

    Criterion G – Presentation
    In particular: very well referenced (see all footnotes).

    You might also like