Sevcenko Tomb-Isaak-Komnenos
Sevcenko Tomb-Isaak-Komnenos
Sevcenko Tomb-Isaak-Komnenos
PHERRAI
Nancy P. Sevöenko
135
136 Nancy Sevcenko
tified with Pherrai, a town in Greek Thrace not far from Alexan-
droupolis and the Turkish border. In the town of Pherrai there stands
today a large church of the Komnenian period, in plan a modified cross-
in-square, adorned with frescoes of the twelfth century (Fig. 1). This
church is presumed to have been the katholikon of Isaak's monastery
of the Kosmosoteira.3
During his happier years at the court of Constantinople, Isaak ap
parently erected a tomb for himself in the Monastery of Chora, for
in the Typikon he requests that various elements of the structure at
Chora be removed and shipped to his new foundation.4 His anxiety
over this move led him to set forth his instructions in some detail; he
thus furnishes us with precious information about what constituted a
princely tomb of the first half of the twelfth century.
Isaak speaks first of transferring the marble slabs which were to
house his remains: his tomb then was probably not a hollowed-out sar-
cophagos but was composed of several pieces of marble fitted together.
He speaks, too, of a cast bronze railing, of an icon stand, and of images
(the word used is στήλαι) of his parents, i.e. Alexios and Irene, all of
which had apparently already been set up in Chora. There was also an
image of himself there, which he insists be not removed.5 Incidentally,
Isaak later gives special orders that there be no image made of him
anywhere at all in the new monastery.6
Isaak goes on to say that in the middle of the lid of the tomb "I
of the Typikon of changes in plan occuring as construction progressed (e.g. in the loca
tion of icons and in the burial places of his close associates). Despite his poor health,
then, Isaak must have lived on for quite some time after 1152, and have continued to
add new instructions to the Typikon.
3
The identification was first made by Uspenskij (cf. note 1 above). Petit proposed
another church nearer the sea, the Παναγία Σκαλωτή (cf. note 2 above, p. 19), but
Uspenskij's identification has been generally accepted. A. Orlandos, "Τα Βυζαντινά
μνημεία της Βήρας," Θρακικά 4 (1933) 3-44; Nancy Patterson (Sevòenko), "Byzantine
Frescoes at Pherrai " (M.A. Thesis, Columbia University, 1964); D. Mouriki, "Stylistic
Trends in Monumental Painting of Greece during the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries,"
Dumbarion Oaks Papers 34/35 (1982) 103-05, figs. 45-49.
4
Section 89, Petit, p. 63. The date of the tomb at Chora is unknown. It seems hard
to believe that Isaak was planning his tomb before 1122, i.e. while still in his 20s. The
portrait of himself which he says was done in "the vanity of youth," must date before
1122, since when Isaak returned to Constantinople from exile, he was already forty-three
years old. But the tomb project itself may date from this later period, and have merely
incorporated an early portrait into its design.
5
A portrait of Isaak as a donor forms part of the early fourteenth century mosaic
decoration at Chora commissioned by Theodore Metochites, a later benefactor of the
church, P. Underwood, The Kariye Djami (Bollingen Series, N.Y., 1966), 1 pp. 11-13,
45-48; 2, Plates pp. 36 and 37.
6
Section 77, Petit, p. 59. The passage indicates that such commemorative portraiture
must have been considered routine.
The Tomb of Isaak Komnenos 137
The tomb was to be located in the left part of the narthex, there
where, he says, "I made an extension (παρεκβολή) to the building for
11
my tomb." This brings up another puzzle: What sort of space did
the tomb occupy? Was Isaak talking about a separate structure, a real
tomb chamber attached to the narthex, or about something smaller,
an arcosolium niche, for example, at one end of it?
Turning back to the Typikon, we find that Isaak says that the rail
ing to be brought from Chora should separate the tomb from "the
whole of the narthex." And in it should be an entrance-way so that
the monks can go in after Vespers and recite the Trisagion before the
two icons, plus forty Kyrie Eleisons for the repose of his soul before
they retire to their cells.12 Now the monastery was designed to have at
least fifty "singing" monks,13 and unless we assume they filed in one
by one, we should probably reconstruct Isaak's tomb as a separate
chamber large enough to accomodate at least a portion of them.
Turning for confirmation to the evidence provided by the structures
surviving at Pherrai, we discover to our regret that, though there are
paving stones visible to the West of the present West wall of the church,
no narthex has been preserved—neither esonarthex nor exonarthex, both
of which are mentioned in the Typikon. However, the small domed
NW and SW corner bays of the cross-in-square church each have a very
tall recess 2.70m. long and .80m. deep in their Western wall. Robert
Ousterhout has recently suggested that the tomb could have been located
in one of these.14
There are two difficulties with this intriguing proposal which make
me at present somewhat hesitant to accept it. We would have to assume
1) that Isaak would term this Western bay of his cross-in-square church
"the narthex," and 2) that he would use the word παρεκβολή, an "ex
tension," with reference to such a recess. This word, it seems to me,
would more aptly describe a structure like the little burial chamber
attached to the North wall of the Παναγία των Χαλκέων,
Thessalonike.15 But Professor Ousterhout is undertaking a new study
of the church architecture, and only when his observations on the ac
tual remains become available, can the issue begin to be settled.
11
Section 89, Petit, p. 63.
12
Sections 7, 90, Petit, pp. 22-23, 64.
13
Sections 3, Petit, p. 21. There were also to be 24 monks serving the needs of these 50.
14
"The Architecture of the Kariye Camii in Istanbul,'* PhD thesis, University of Il
linois at Urbana/Champaign, 1982, p. 113.
15
D.E. Evangelides, Ή Παναγία των Χαλκέων (Thessalonike, 1954) figs. 1-2, PI. 5b.
Uspenskij's photograph of the church from the West (cf. note 1 above, PI. 2) shows a struc
ture adjoining its NW corner (no longer extant). Orlandos' plan indicates a door in the
North wall of the church (now blocked by a buttress) which probably communicated with
this structure (cf. note 3 above, fig. 6). But neither author gives us any indication of date.
The Tomb of Isaak Komnenos 139