Must Credit Obtained by ABC News
Must Credit Obtained by ABC News
Must Credit Obtained by ABC News
11.01.2020
ALABAMA Issue 20
SUMMARY
• Alabama is currently a mixed picture, with early evidence of stability at a high plateau of cases, but with increased hospitalization.
To further accelerate improvements, Alabama should enhance detection of asymptomatic cases while continuing mitigation
efforts.
• Alabama is in the red zone for cases, indicating 101 or more new cases per 100,000 population, with the 33rd highest rate in the
country. Alabama is in the orange zone for test positivity, indicating a rate between 8.0% and 10.0%, with the 18th highest rate in
the country.
• Alabama has seen a decrease in new cases and stability in test positivity.
• The following three counties had the highest number of new cases over the last 3 weeks: 1. Jefferson County, 2. Montgomery
County, and 3. Mobile County. These counties represent 23.8% of new cases in Alabama.
• 85% of all counties in Alabama have moderate or high levels of community transmission (yellow, orange, or red zones), with 45%
having high levels of community transmission (red zone).
• During the week of Oct 19 - Oct 25, 16% of nursing homes had at least one new resident COVID-19 case, 32% had at least one new
staff COVID-19 case, and 6% had at least one new resident COVID-19 death.
• Alabama had 130 new cases per 100,000 population, compared to a national average of 165 per 100,000.
• Current staff deployed from the federal government as assets to support the state response are: 40 to support operations activities
from FEMA and 1 to support operations activities from USCG.
• The federal government has supported surge testing in Birmingham, AL.
• Between Oct 24 - Oct 30, on average, 155 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and 116 patients with suspected COVID-19 were
reported as newly admitted each day to hospitals in Alabama. An average of greater than 95% of hospitals reported either new
confirmed or new suspected COVID patients each day during this period.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• They also show significant deterioration in the Sunbelt as mitigation efforts were decreased over the past 5 weeks.
• New hospital admissions in Alabama continue to rise, suggesting the foci of community spread still exist.
• Alabama must continue the strong mitigation efforts statewide and expand mitigation in the counties with rising cases and
hospitalizations. Mitigation efforts should continue to include wearing masks in public, physical distancing, hand hygiene,
eliminating the options for crowding in public and eliminating all social gatherings that extend beyond the immediate household,
and ensuring flu immunizations.
• Alabama must increase surveillance for silent community spread. Use the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests as weekly repeat
surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent (asymptomatic) community spread among community college
students; K-12 teachers; students over 18; all hospital staff; staff working at nursing homes, assisted living, and other congregate
living settings; prison staff; and first responders. Triangulate all these new positives to specific geographic locations and create
testing incentives to increase testing of all community members; target all 18-35 year-old age groups to identify the highly
contagious silent viral spreaders. All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests
conducted; these must be reported as COVID cases and isolated.
• Unrelenting and significant community spread is initiated by social gatherings among friends and family. People must remember
that seemingly uninfected family members and friends may be infected but asymptomatic. Exposure to asymptomatic cases can
easily lead to spread as people unmask in private gatherings. There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community
spread. Recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert through the media, including social media, by noting the exposure history of
recent admissions; in other words, the percent of most recent hospital admissions who were infected at gatherings with family and
friends.
• There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community spread; recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert by noting
the exposure history of recent admissions. In other words, 50% of the most recent admissions were infected at gatherings with
family and friends.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no
further outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to
hometowns for the holiday season.
• Ensure all nursing homes, assisted living, and elderly care sites have full testing capacity and are isolating positive staff and
residents.
• There continue to be high levels of positive staff members at long-term care facilities. These cases are indicative of continued and
unmitigated community spread in these geographic locations.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ALABAMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
ALABAMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
ALABAMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
ALABAMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Montgomery, St. Clair, Morgan, DeKalb, Etowah, Cullman, Baldwin, Calhoun, Limestone,
Jackson, Blount, Talladega, Marshall, Colbert, Dale, Coffee, Chilton, Franklin, Lawrence, Pickens, Clarke,
Marengo, Geneva, Bibb, Randolph, Lamar, Cherokee, Henry, Hale, Coosa
All Yellow Counties: Jefferson, Mobile, Madison, Tuscaloosa, Lauderdale, Elmore, Covington, Winston, Clay,
Washington, Russell, Dallas, Macon, Lowndes, Conecuh
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ALABAMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Transmission continues to intensify across the state, now in rural and indigenous villages as well as more in populated urban
centers. The state should pivot to new strategies using different communications tactics and approaches.
• Maintain testing above 2,000 per 100,000 population per week in all boroughs and follow test positivity, hospitalizations, and
hospital capacity at the local level closely (especially in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kusilvak).
• Enhanced surveillance, including testing asymptomatic persons, will be key in identifying and interrupting pockets of transmission;
consider using social and commercial outlets as testing stations.
• Ensure scheduled, routine testing, regardless of symptoms, to detect silent spread among critical personnel, such as teachers,
clinical staff, staff working at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and all other congregate living settings, prisoners and prison staff,
public transportation workers, and first responders.
• Utilize rapid antigen testing for populations at critical risk for transmitting (e.g., clinical staff and staff who work in any congregate
settings) and ensure all results, positive and negative, are captured and reported. Staff at LTCFs should not be permitted to work
with residents or patients if they test positive.
• Recommend local ordinances for face coverings in all boroughs with elevated transmission, along with enforced limitations on
occupancy and social distancing. Post local ordinances and local hospital capacity on front page of state website.
• Redouble efforts in rural and indigenous communities to ensure easy access to testing, quick reporting of results, immediate
isolation, and rapid contact tracing. Ensure sufficient housing for safe isolation of cases and provision of food, water, and necessary
resources.
• Efforts to protect and isolate most vulnerable are commendable, but extraction from rural areas may be unsustainable; intensify
messaging on escalating risks of transmission among small gatherings of family and friends and provide strategies for families to
effectively protect vulnerable persons by avoiding close contacts, even within households.
• Ensure K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines.
• Monitor contact tracing in all boroughs to ensure that cases are immediately isolated and given education package (facilitated by
text or email) and contact tracing is conducted within 72 hours; expand contact tracing capacity by limiting interview depth,
scripting interviews, developing clear algorithms, expanding staff, and task-shifting.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ALASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
ALASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
ALASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
ALASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 BOROUGH AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
0 5
Matanuska-Susitna
IN RED N/A
Kenai Peninsula
Kusilvak Census Area
ZONE Southeast Fairbanks Census Area
■ (+0) ▲ (+3) Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
2 Anchorage
Fairbanks 2 Anchorage Municipality
Fairbanks North Star
▲ (+1) ▼ (-2)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
1 Juneau 4 Bethel Census Area
Juneau City and
North Slope
Northwest Arctic
■ (+0) ▲ (+2)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating borough-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ALASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• It also shows significant deterioration in the Sunbelt as mitigation efforts were decreased over the past 5 weeks.
• New hospital admissions in Arizona continue to rise, suggesting the foci of expanding community spread still exist and need to be
identified and controlled.
• Arizona must expand mitigation in the counties with rising cases and hospitalizations. Mitigation efforts should continue to include
wearing masks in public; physical distancing; hand hygiene; avoiding or eliminating the opportunities for mask-less crowding in
public, including bars, and limiting all private social gatherings to the immediate household; and ensuring flu immunizations.
• Arizona must increase surveillance for silent community spread. Use the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests as weekly repeat
surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent (asymptomatic) community spread among community college
students; K-12 teachers; students over 18; all hospital staff; staff working at nursing homes, assisted living, and other congregate
living settings; prison staff; and first responders. Triangulate all these new positives to specific geographic locations and create
testing incentives to increase testing of all community members; target all 18-35 year-old age groups to identify the highly
contagious silent viral spreaders. All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests
conducted; these must be reported as COVID cases and isolated.
• Unrelenting and significant community spread is initiated by social gatherings among friends and family. People must remember
that seemingly uninfected family members and friends may be infected but asymptomatic. Exposure to asymptomatic cases can
easily lead to spread as people unmask in private gatherings. There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community
spread. Recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert through the media, including social media, by noting the exposure history of
recent admissions; in other words, the percent of most recent hospital admissions who were infected at gatherings with family and
friends.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no
further outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to
hometowns for the holiday season.
• Ensure all nursing homes, assisted living, and elderly care sites have full testing capacity and are isolating positive staff and
residents.
• Institute weekly testing of all members of Tribal Nations on reservations to stop both the asymptomatic, as well as symptomatic,
community spread. It is critical to identify the asymptomatic spreaders; universities that contact traced symptomatic individuals
and tested to find viral positive, asymptomatic students decreased community spread by 97% compared to colleges that only
diagnosed symptomatic students and contact traced.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ARIZONA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
ARIZONA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
ARIZONA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
ARIZONA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
3 Yuma
Payson
Safford
3 Yuma
Gila
Graham
■ (+0) ▼ (-1)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
4 Tucson
Show Low
Lake Havasu City-Kingman
Sierra Vista-Douglas
4 Pima
Navajo
Mohave
Cochise
▲ (+4) ▲ (+4)
LOCALITIES
4 6
Maricopa
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler Pinal
IN YELLOW Flagstaff Coconino
ZONE Prescott Valley-Prescott
Nogales
Apache
Yavapai
▼ (-1) ■ (+0) Santa Cruz
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ARIZONA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ARKANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
ARKANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
ARKANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
ARKANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Craighead, Greene, Mississippi, Miller, Poinsett, Jackson, Lawrence, Baxter, Phillips, Arkansas,
Sevier, Union, Clay, Fulton, Howard, Ashley, Little River, Desha, Prairie, Newton
All Orange Counties: Sebastian, Garland, Crawford, Crittenden, Izard, St. Francis, Carroll, Ouachita, Sharp,
Lafayette, Cleveland, Monroe, Chicot
All Yellow Counties: Pulaski, Washington, Benton, Faulkner, Saline, Jefferson, White, Lonoke, Pope, Boone, Hot
Spring, Lincoln, Franklin, Randolph, Hempstead, Columbia, Cross, Cleburne, Nevada, Grant, Drew, Polk, Marion
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ARKANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• California has had strong success with the gradated series of mitigation measures applied to localities according to local
epidemiological trends. We share the concern of California leaders that enhanced disease control measures are needed to avoid an
increase in preventable hospitalizations and deaths. Additional measures should include additional communications to reinforce
messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening that extends beyond adjustment of
county mitigation levels. This will require continued and enhanced communication from state, local, and community leaders of a
clear and shared message asking Californians to wear masks, physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private
spaces, especially indoors. In addition to ongoing media campaigns, increased use of community influencers is recommended;
hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and
transmission venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase
surveillance for silent community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be
used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to
monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance
data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities,
work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds,
potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not
followed due to people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have
symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple
people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for
asymptomatic infections.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported
as COVID cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however,
given the high and increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely
test all teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic
cases and cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student
body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
CALIFORNIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
CALIFORNIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
CALIFORNIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
CALIFORNIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
1 El Centro 1 Imperial
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
San Bernardino
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Riverside
LOCALITIES
7 9
Fresno Fresno
IN YELLOW Santa Rosa-Petaluma
Visalia
Sonoma
Tulare
ZONE Hanford-Corcoran Kings
▲ (+3) Yuba City
Red Bluff
▲ (+4) Tehama
Sutter
Yuba
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
CALIFORNIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Colorado leaders that the current situation is worsening and that there is a limited time window to limit
further cases and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is critical
and is commended.
• Colorado has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures in
response to changes in incidence. At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional
measures should be taken, in addition to expeditious upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread.
• As called for in the state plan, intensification in mitigation measures by local authorities in response to disease activity, such as those being
taken in El Paso County, should be encouraged and accelerated. Given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts to be keep less intense
mitigation levels are unlikely to succeed. Initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease and earlier
resumption of business activity than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Communication from state, local, and community leaders is needed for a clear and shared message asking Coloradans to wear masks,
physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces. The Step Up Colorado media campaign is commended,
especially its use of community influencers. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully
recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year-olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts
to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all
teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as cases decline. Encourage
institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family
and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
COLORADO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
COLORADO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
COLORADO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COLORADO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
1 Montrose 4 Teller
Pitkin
Grand
Lake
■ (+0) ▲ (+2)
Denver
Arapahoe
El Paso
LOCALITIES
6 14
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood Jefferson
Colorado Springs Larimer
IN YELLOW Fort Collins Douglas
ZONE Grand Junction
Glenwood Springs
Mesa
Broomfield
■ (+0) Fort Morgan ▲ (+2) Garfield
Morgan
Alamosa
Yuma
All Yellow Counties: Denver, Arapahoe, El Paso, Jefferson, Larimer, Douglas, Mesa, Broomfield, Garfield,
Morgan, Alamosa, Yuma, Otero, Park
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
COLORADO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities
nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially. These maps demonstrate
the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to
prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Connecticut leaders that the current situation is worsening and that there is a limited time window to prevent further
cases and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is critical and is commended.
• Connecticut has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures in response to
changes in incidence. At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional measures should be
taken in addition to expeditious upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional measures should include
communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• As called for in the state plan, intensification in mitigation measures by local authorities in response to disease activity, such as the move to phase 2
temporarily taken in Windham and New Haven, should be encouraged. Movement to the maximum mitigation level recommended under the state plan
associated with the current level of disease activity is recommended; given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts to be keep less intense mitigation
levels are unlikely to succeed. Initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease and earlier resumption of business
activity than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission at personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message is needed to ask Connecticuters to wear masks, physically
distance, and avoid gatherings, especially indoors. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to
amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission venues. In
addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent community spread. Given
their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for
implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the
cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In
these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35
year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to people
assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic
COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues
through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID cases.
Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and increasing rates
of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as cases decline. Encourage institutions
of higher education to test their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
CONNECTICUT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
CONNECTICUT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
CONNECTICUT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
CONNECTICUT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
2 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
New Haven-Milford 3 Fairfield
Hartford
New Haven
▲ (+2) ▲ (+3)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
CONNECTICUT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the assessment of Delaware leaders that the COVID epidemic is not over by any means. The current situation is unstable, given the
gradual increase in test positivity; there is a limited time window to prevent further cases and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths.
The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is critical and is commended.
• Delaware has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures in
response to changes in incidence. Additional measures should include communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and
a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Delawareans to wear masks, physically
distance, and avoid gatherings is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited
to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts
to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the
immediate family. Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be
critical to rapid epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID
cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and
increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• The development of additional contact tracing capacity is commended. If uptake of the anticipated new contact tracer app is adequate, this
will considerably facilitate improved contact tracing.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all
teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic cases and
cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave
campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
DELAWARE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
DELAWARE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
DELAWARE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
DELAWARE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
1 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington 0 N/A
▲ (+1) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
DELAWARE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• The current favorable situation in the District is likely not stable given the gradual increase in test positivity despite very high levels
of testing; the current period would be an optimal, but limited, time window to pivot to additional mitigation activities and limit
further cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.
• The District has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures
in response to changes in incidence. Additional measures should include communications to reinforce messaging around social
gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county
mitigation levels. Communication from local and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking DC residents to wear
masks, physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital
personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and
transmission venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase
surveillance for silent community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be
used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to
monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance
data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities,
work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds,
potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not
followed due to people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have
symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple
people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for
asymptomatic infections.
• Public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the immediate family. Maintaining
or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be critical to rapid
epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported
as COVID cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however,
given the high and increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely
test all teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic
cases and cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student
body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
FLORIDA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
FLORIDA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
FLORIDA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
FLORIDA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
2 5
Okaloosa
IN RED Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin
Hardee
Union
ZONE Wauchula
Franklin
▲ (+1) ■ (+0) Glades
Hernando
LOCALITIES
3 8
Walton
Monroe
IN ORANGE Key West
Sebring-Avon Park
Highlands
ZONE Palatka
Putnam
Baker
▲ (+3) ▲ (+6) Taylor
Dixie
All Yellow CBSAs: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Jacksonville,
North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Lakeland-Winter Haven, Gainesville, Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Pensacola-
Ferry Pass-Brent, Naples-Marco Island, Port St. Lucie, Panama City, Sebastian-Vero Beach, Homosassa Springs, Clewiston, Okeechobee
All Yellow Counties: Miami-Dade, Broward, Orange, Palm Beach, Hillsborough, Duval, Pinellas, Lee, Polk, Brevard, Alachua, Manatee,
Collier, Osceola, Pasco, Seminole, St. Johns, St. Lucie, Clay, Bay, Indian River, Santa Rosa, Citrus, Martin, Flagler, Suwannee, Holmes,
Washington, Hendry, Okeechobee, Jefferson, Calhoun, Bradford, Levy
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
FLORIDA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
GEORGIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
GEORGIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
GEORGIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
GEORGIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Orange CBSAs: Augusta-Richmond County, Savannah, Macon-Bibb County, Warner Robins, Valdosta, Dublin, LaGrange, Cornelia, Toccoa, St. Marys,
Thomasville, Fitzgerald, Eufaula
All Red Counties: Clayton, Whitfield, Henry, Floyd, Bartow, Gordon, Jackson, Effingham, Barrow, Walker, Spalding, Polk, Catoosa, Coffee, Franklin,
Chattooga, Tift, Haralson, Toombs, Peach, Fannin, Wayne, Appling, Tattnall, Washington, Towns, Dade, Candler, Clinch, Oglethorpe, Treutlen, Early,
Heard, Wilkes
All Orange Counties: Columbia, Walton, Carroll, Bibb, Lowndes, Houston, Douglas, Paulding, Coweta, Rockdale, Laurens, Murray, Dodge, Troup, Pickens,
Habersham, Stephens, Bryan, Brantley, Telfair, Camden, Emanuel, Thomas, Madison, Putnam, McDuffie, Pierce, Ben Hill, Elbert, Rabun, Hart, Stewart,
Burke, Grady, Banks, Monroe, Lamar, Morgan, Pike, Pulaski
All Yellow Counties: Fulton, Gwinnett, DeKalb, Cobb, Hall, Cherokee, Chatham, Richmond, Forsyth, Newton, Ware, Glynn, Colquitt, Bulloch, Gilmer,
Baldwin, Liberty, Decatur, Union, Jones, Greene, Meriwether, Cook, Butts, Berrien, Miller, Calhoun, McIntosh
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
GEORGIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
HAWAII
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
HAWAII
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
HAWAII
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
HAWAII
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
▼ (-1) ▼ (-1)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
HAWAII
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• Given the urgency of the situation, it is critical to pivot from current approach to implementation of tried and true mitigation strategies and
adoption of more innovative, locally effective interventions. Consider working with advertising or corporate partners with proven success in
local markets to develop new communication strategies.
• The intensity of spread can be limited by effectively implementing proven mitigation interventions, which generally track with clear policy;
recommend tighter restrictions on commercial indoor occupancy and promotion of face covering ordinances, especially in the highest
burden counties where hospital capacity is limited.
• Uptake of promoted strategies should be monitored and messaging intensified where adherence is low; expand use of local hospital or
clinical staff as part of strong public advocacy for community mitigation behaviors.
• Testing should be expanded until it exceeds 2,000 per 100,000 population per week in all counties. Testing needs to reach asymptomatic
young adults to curb transmission. Innovative testing strategies using rapid tests should be deployed in social and commercial
environments.
• Monitor contact tracing capacity to ensure all cases are immediately isolated and interviewed within 48 hours of diagnosis; if necessary,
expand contact tracing capacity by focusing the interview, developing scripts and clear algorithms, task-shifting, and coordinating remote
surge capacity from districts with lower case rates.
• Continue development of surveillance network in lower transmission counties by increasing use of quantitative local wastewater testing and
by routinely testing selected staff who are at increased risk of infection, regardless of symptoms.
• Staff who are in a position to transmit disease, particularly to vulnerable populations (e.g., clinical staff and staff that work in long-term care
facilities (LTCFs) or other congregate settings), should be regularly tested with rapid antigen tests and should not be permitted to work with
clients unless they have a recent rapid test negative.
• The Idaho Dept. of Health & Welfare (IDHW) is encouraged to consider seeking contract medical staffing through such programs as GSA's VA
medical provider contract, BCFS Medical and Health Care, or other contracted health and medical services.
• IDHW should schedule and increase frequency of communications with their Public Health Districts (PHD) and Healthcare Coalitions to
improve situational awareness and greater understanding of local gaps and shortfalls. Encourage maintaining robust communications with
Idaho Office of Emergency Management.
• In advance of the holidays, expand messaging across all media platforms (including automated SMS) to educate vulnerable individuals and
their families about the risks of transmission from familial or smaller social gatherings and make clear recommendations to avoid all such
gatherings and crowded public spaces, especially for those at increased risk of severe disease.
• All institutions of higher education should post details of testing on their website, including testing volume, positivity, and trends and should
implement strict community mitigation efforts on campus and address violations with disciplinary action.
• Ensure strict adherence to CDC school policy guidance to curb transmission, including use of face coverings for all K-12 students and
teachers.
• Expand culturally-specific messaging to at-risk groups (Hispanic community and Tribal Nations) and ensure adequate contact tracing and
isolation/quarantine facilities and supplies.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
IDAHO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
IDAHO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
IDAHO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
IDAHO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
1 Sandpoint 3 Bonner
Adams
Oneida
▲ (+1) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 2 Teton
Lewis
▼ (-2) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red CBSAs: Boise, Twin Falls, Idaho Falls, Rexburg, Coeur d'Alene, Pocatello, Burley, Blackfoot, Lewiston, Moscow, Hailey, Logan, Ontario,
Mountain Home, Jackson
All Red Counties: Ada, Canyon, Twin Falls, Madison, Bonneville, Kootenai, Bannock, Cassia, Bingham, Nez Perce, Minidoka, Jerome, Jefferson,
Latah, Gooding, Fremont, Franklin, Blaine, Payette, Elmore, Caribou, Lemhi, Idaho, Lincoln, Boundary, Gem, Washington, Power, Shoshone,
Butte, Owyhee, Clearwater, Benewah
Red CBSAs: Boise CBSA is comprised of Ada County, ID; Boise County, ID; Canyon County, ID; Gem County, ID; and Owyhee County, ID. Twin Falls
CBSA is comprised of Jerome County, ID and Twin Falls County, ID. Idaho Falls CBSA is comprised of Bonneville County, ID; Butte County, ID; and
Jefferson County, ID. Rexburg CBSA is comprised of Fremont County, ID and Madison County, ID. Coeur d'Alene CBSA is comprised of Kootenai
County, ID. Pocatello CBSA is comprised of Bannock County, ID and Power County, ID. Burley CBSA is comprised of Cassia County, ID and
Minidoka County, ID. Blackfoot CBSA is comprised of Bingham County, ID. Lewiston CBSA is comprised of Nez Perce County, ID and Asotin
County, WA. Moscow CBSA is comprised of Latah County, ID. Hailey CBSA is comprised of Blaine County, ID and Camas County, ID. Logan CBSA is
comprised of Franklin County, ID and Cache County, UT. Ontario CBSA is comprised of Payette County, ID and Malheur County, OR. Mountain
Home CBSA is comprised of Elmore County, ID. Jackson CBSA is comprised of Teton County, ID and Teton County, WY.
Orange CBSAs: Sandpoint CBSA is comprised of Bonner County, ID.
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
IDAHO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Illinois leaders that the current situation is worsening dramatically and that there is a limited time window to
prevent further cases and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is
critical and is commended.
• Illinois has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures in response
to changes in incidence. At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional measures
should be taken, in addition to expeditious upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional measures
should include communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Movement to the mitigation level recommended under the state plan associated with the current level of disease activity is recommended;
given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts to be keep less intense mitigation levels are unlikely to succeed. Local authorities should
support the mitigation measures to avoid preventable hospitalizations and deaths, as initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will
allow for earlier control of disease and earlier resumption of business activity than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Illinoisans to wear masks, physically
distance, and avoid gatherings, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been
successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally. The "It Only Works If You Wear It" campaign is noted and commended. Hospital
personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID
cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and
increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all
teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic cases and
cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave
campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ILLINOIS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
ILLINOIS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
ILLINOIS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
ILLINOIS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Rockford, St. Louis, Springfield, Decatur, Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Carbondale-Marion, Quincy, Kankakee, Sterling,
Charleston-Mattoon, Freeport, Rochelle, Dixon, Jacksonville, Effingham, Taylorville, Fort Madison-Keokuk, Burlington, Cape Girardeau
All Red Counties: Will, Kane, Winnebago, McHenry, Macon, Sangamon, Madison, Rock Island, Adams, DeKalb, Kankakee, Kendall, Whiteside, Boone, Stephenson,
Clinton, Williamson, Coles, Ogle, Franklin, Douglas, Lee, Randolph, Effingham, Grundy, Morgan, Pike, Shelby, Monroe, Jo Daviess, Carroll, Bureau, Saline, Christian,
Warren, Johnson, Mercer, Perry, Hancock, Clay, Washington, Greene, Cumberland, Wabash, Hamilton, Henderson, Alexander, Scott, Putnam
All Orange Counties: Cook, DuPage, Lake, St. Clair, Tazewell, Vermilion, Knox, Marion, Fulton, Jackson, McDonough, Moultrie, Wayne, Bond, Logan, Iroquois,
Crawford, Clark, Lawrence, Jasper, Pulaski, Stark
All Yellow Counties: Peoria, McLean, LaSalle, Livingston, Woodford, Macoupin, Jefferson, Fayette, Montgomery, Union, Mason, Henry, Piatt, Ford, De Witt, Cass,
Menard, Brown, Massac
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
ILLINOIS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the concern of Indiana leaders on the need to limit further cases and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths. Indiana had
considerable success previously in limiting morbidity and mortality using adaptable mitigation measures in response to changes in
incidence. At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional measures should be
taken in addition to upward adjustment of mitigation in highly affected counties to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional
measures should include communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Intensification in mitigation measures in highly affected counties should be encouraged and accelerated. Movement to more intensive
mitigation level for red or orange counties is recommended; given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts to be keep less intense mitigation
levels are unlikely to succeed. Local authorities should support the mitigation measures to avoid preventable hospitalizations and deaths as
initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease and earlier resumption of business activity than a
lagging upward adjustment.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Hoosiers to wear masks, physically distance,
and avoid gatherings, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully
recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID
cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and
increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all
teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic cases and
cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave
campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
INDIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
INDIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
INDIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
INDIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Evansville, Elkhart-Goshen, Fort Wayne, Louisville/Jefferson County, Muncie, Warsaw, Richmond, Jasper, Bedford, New
Castle, Marion, Connersville, Seymour, Kendallville, Vincennes, Auburn, Frankfort, Logansport, Angola, Washington, Wabash, Bluffton
All Red Counties: Elkhart, Allen, Vanderburgh, Porter, Delaware, Johnson, Madison, Kosciusko, Wayne, Hendricks, Warrick, Dubois, Lawrence, Henry, Grant, Fayette,
Jackson, Dearborn, Jasper, Noble, Knox, Posey, Shelby, DeKalb, Clinton, Cass, Steuben, Morgan, Daviess, Wabash, Randolph, Wells, Perry, Starke, Whitley, Putnam,
LaGrange, Jay, Greene, Fulton, Rush, Sullivan, Parke, Blackford, Pike, Newton, Pulaski, Ohio, Warren, Union, Benton
All Orange Counties: Marion, Lake, St. Joseph, Vigo, LaPorte, Clark, Adams, Hancock, Gibson, Miami, Harrison, Huntington, Fountain, Clay, Vermillion, Jefferson,
Scott, Spencer, Washington, Franklin, Carroll, Tipton, Switzerland
All Yellow Counties: Hamilton, Tippecanoe, Marshall, Floyd, Howard, Boone, Bartholomew, Ripley, Montgomery, White, Orange, Decatur, Jennings, Brown, Martin
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
INDIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
IOWA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
IOWA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
IOWA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
IOWA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
1 5
Johnson
IN YELLOW Iowa City
Hamilton
Poweshiek
ZONE Madison
▼ (-1) ▼ (-14) Van Buren
All Red CBSAs: Des Moines-West Des Moines, Cedar Rapids, Dubuque, Waterloo-Cedar Falls, Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Omaha-Council Bluffs, Sioux
City, Burlington, Fort Dodge, Carroll, Muscatine, Clinton, Marshalltown, Fort Madison-Keokuk, Oskaloosa, Pella, Storm Lake, Ottumwa, Spirit Lake,
Spencer, Fairfield
All Red Counties: Polk, Dubuque, Linn, Scott, Woodbury, Black Hawk, Pottawattamie, Dallas, Sioux, Des Moines, Webster, Plymouth, Carroll, Muscatine,
Clinton, Warren, Harrison, Marshall, Delaware, Jasper, Benton, Lee, Jackson, O'Brien, Henry, Mahaska, Marion, Cedar, Cass, Crawford, Buena Vista,
Clayton, Wapello, Jones, Dickinson, Bremer, Tama, Mills, Hardin, Buchanan, Winnebago, Washington, Page, Iowa, Clay, Kossuth, Fayette, Wright,
Humboldt, Allamakee, Emmet, Lyon, Adair, Shelby, Osceola, Cherokee, Guthrie, Jefferson, Grundy, Calhoun, Monroe, Mitchell, Union, Louisa, Clarke, Palo
Alto, Floyd, Chickasaw, Decatur, Taylor, Montgomery, Ida, Monona, Audubon, Pocahontas, Fremont, Keokuk, Davis, Lucas, Wayne, Worth, Adams
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
IOWA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
KANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
KANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
KANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
KANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Kansas City, Wichita, Hutchinson, Topeka, Garden City, Dodge City, Liberal, Salina, Pittsburg, Hays, Emporia, Great Bend,
McPherson, Ottawa, St. Joseph
All Red Counties: Sedgwick, Johnson, Wyandotte, Reno, Shawnee, Finney, Norton, Butler, Ford, Seward, Crawford, Leavenworth, Ellis,
Harvey, Ellsworth, Barton, Lyon, Nemaha, Thomas, McPherson, Franklin, Grant, Gove, Sheridan, Sherman, Cherokee, Miami, Anderson,
Sumner, Pratt, Dickinson, Neosho, Brown, Decatur, Pottawatomie, Cloud, Russell, Logan, Jackson, Jefferson, Doniphan, Phillips, Gray,
Stevens, Rice, Clay, Greenwood, Cheyenne, Barber, Rawlins, Wallace, Wichita, Marshall, Harper, Wilson, Kingman, Coffey, Morris, Rooks,
Pawnee, Ottawa, Edwards, Stafford, Washington, Hodgeman
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
KANSAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
KENTUCKY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
KENTUCKY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
KENTUCKY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
KENTUCKY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Jefferson, Hardin, Bullitt, Christian, Pike, Nelson, Barren, Shelby, Henderson, Calloway, Knox, Elliott, Hart, Marion, Clay,
Montgomery, Logan, Perry, Taylor, Bell, Lee, Garrard, Johnson, Marshall, Larue, Meade, Martin, McLean, Knott, Monroe, Bourbon,
Spencer, Jackson, Estill, Henry, Hancock, Breckinridge, Nicholas, Trigg, Owsley, Cumberland, Hickman, Carroll, Robertson
All Orange Counties: Kenton, Boone, Campbell, Laurel, McCracken, Jessamine, Floyd, Rockcastle, Carter, Union, Fleming, Graves,
Rowan, Magoffin, Butler, Morgan, Owen
All Yellow Counties: Fayette, Warren, Madison, Daviess, Hopkins, Scott, Whitley, Oldham, Greenup, Boyd, Muhlenberg, Boyle, Allen, Ohio,
Lincoln, Harlan, Caldwell, Wayne, Washington, Webster, Woodford, Todd, Lawrence, Anderson, Grant, Metcalfe, Lewis, Breathitt,
Crittenden, Menifee
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
KENTUCKY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
LOUISIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
LOUISIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
LOUISIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
LOUISIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 PARISH AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
0 5
Ascension
IN RED N/A
Franklin
Richland
ZONE Red River
▼ (-2) ▼ (-8) Caldwell
LOCALITIES
2 6
Bossier
Ouachita
IN ORANGE Lake Charles Calcasieu
ZONE Natchitoches Livingston
Natchitoches
▼ (-1) ▼ (-2) St. Martin
Caddo
Tangipahoa
Shreveport-Bossier City
LOCALITIES
7 10
Lincoln
Baton Rouge
Jackson
IN YELLOW Monroe
Hammond
Webster
ZONE Ruston
Union
Sabine
▲ (+1) Minden
DeRidder
▼ (-3) Bienville
LaSalle
Beauregard
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating parish-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
LOUISIANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MAINE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MAINE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MAINE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MAINE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MAINE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Maryland’s current favorable situation likely not stable given the gradual increase in cases; the increase in hospitalizations indicates
ongoing increases in disease transmission. The current period offers a limited time window to pivot to additional mitigation
activities and prevent further cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.
• Maryland has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality by adapting mitigation measures in response to changes
in incidence. Additional measures should include communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new
asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Marylanders to wear masks,
physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are
frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and
transmission venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase
surveillance for silent community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be
used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to
monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance
data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities,
work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds,
potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not
followed due to people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have
symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple
people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for
asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the
immediate family. Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that
appear to be critical to rapid epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported
as COVID cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however,
given the high and increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely
test all teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus. Encourage
institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to
family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MARYLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MARYLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MARYLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MARYLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
3 Hagerstown-Martinsburg
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
Cambridge
4 Prince George's
Baltimore City
Washington
Dorchester
▲ (+1) ▼ (-2)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MARYLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Expansion of testing has been a key achievement over the past two months as high-level testing will be critical if transmission
continues to increase through the winter.
• Wastewater surveillance network is showing excellent potential; recommend locally focused testing to catch early, silent spread
and target testing efforts. Implement state-wide regular testing, regardless of symptoms, of staff at high risk of infection, such as
teachers, clinic staff and staff working congregate living settings, prisoners and prison staff, public transportation workers, and first
responders.
• Utilize rapid antigen testing for populations at critical risk for transmitting to vulnerable populations (e.g., clinical staff and staff
who work in any congregate settings, such as homeless shelters and long-term care facilities) and ensure all results, positive and
negative, are captured and reported. Staff at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) should not be permitted to work with residents or
patients unless they have a recent negative test.
• Prioritize testing of vulnerable populations and those who work or live with them.
• Expand messaging on risks of small social gatherings via social media (all platforms) and SMS to ensure cases among children and
young adults are not spread to more vulnerable populations over the upcoming holidays. Work with advertising or corporate
partners with proven success in local markets to develop new communication strategies.
• Intensify local ordinances on occupancy limits in counties with increasing test positivity (to help reduce likelihood of additional
superspreader events); given increase in nearly all counties and CBSAs since Phase 3 step 2.
• Enforce face covering and social distancing ordinances in all public and commercial settings, especially where close contact is
likely.
• Continuously evaluate and monitor contact tracing capacity in all counties to ensure all cases are immediately isolated and full
contact tracing is conducted within 72 hours; expand capacity as needed to meet these benchmarks by focusing the interview,
developing scripts and clear algorithms, task-shifting, and coordinating remote surge capacity from counties with lower case rates.
• Institutions of higher education should post all testing data on their dashboards and should plan to test students prior to their
return home for holidays.
• Residents at LTCFs are the most vulnerable and their protection should be a top priority; ensure that all facilities are diligently
implementing CMS guidance and staff are tested with rapid tests and not permitted to interact with residents unless they have
tested negative.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MASSACHUSETTS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MASSACHUSETTS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MASSACHUSETTS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MASSACHUSETTS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 1 Nantucket
■ (+0) ▲ (+1)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MASSACHUSETTS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities
nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially. These maps demonstrate
the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to
prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Michigan leaders that the current situation is worsening and that there is a limited time window to prevent further cases
and avoid increases in hospitalizations and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is critical and is commended.
• Michigan has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality through adaptive mitigation measures in response to changes in incidence.
At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional measures should be taken in addition to
expeditious upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional measures should include communications to
reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• As called for in the state plan, intensification in mitigation measures should be taken in response to disease activity. Movement to the mitigation level
recommended under the state plan associated with the current level of disease activity is recommended; given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts
to be keep less intense mitigation levels are unlikely to succeed. Initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease
and earlier resumption of business activity than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from leaders of a clear and shared message asking Michiganders to wear masks, physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both
public and private spaces is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these
messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission venues. In
addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent community spread. Given
their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for
implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the
cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In
these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35
year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to people
assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic
COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues
through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the immediate family.
Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be critical to rapid epidemic
spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID cases.
Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and increasing rates
of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• The release of the new contact tracer app is commended; these apps could substantially improve contact tracing if uptake is adequate.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all teachers as
another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as cases decline. Encourage IHEs to test
their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MICHIGAN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MICHIGAN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MICHIGAN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MICHIGAN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Macomb, Calhoun, Muskegon, Delta, Dickinson, Cass, Van Buren, Gogebic, Clare, Oceana, Emmet,
Otsego, Ontonagon, Presque Isle, Montmorency
All Orange Counties: Oakland, Kent, Genesee, Ottawa, Kalamazoo, Berrien, Marquette, St. Clair, St. Joseph, Barry,
Mecosta, Newaygo, Menominee, Hillsdale, Roscommon, Chippewa, Iosco
All Yellow Counties: Wayne, Saginaw, Ingham, Livingston, Allegan, Monroe, Clinton, Eaton, Midland, Bay, Ionia, Isabella,
Grand Traverse, Shiawassee, Houghton, Iron, Tuscola, Mason, Charlevoix, Osceola, Cheboygan, Sanilac, Antrim, Benzie,
Arenac
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MICHIGAN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities
nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially. These maps demonstrate
the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to
prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Minnesota leaders that the current situation is worsening rapidly and that there is a limited time window to prevent
further increases in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these measures is critical and is commended.
• Minnesota has had considerable success in limiting morbidity and mortality using the adaptive adjustment of mitigation measures in response to
changes in incidence. At this point, the rapid increase in cases and test positivity throughout the state indicates that additional measures should be
taken in addition to expeditious upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional measures should include
communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach. We commend the Minnesota
initiative to conduct asymptomatic screening targeting 18-35 year-olds; this should be a model for other states.
• As called for in the state plan, changes in mitigation measures should be taken in response to disease activity. Movement to the mitigation level
recommended under the state plan associated with the current level of disease activity is recommended; given the trajectory of disease activity, efforts
to be keep less intense mitigation levels are unlikely to succeed. Initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease
and earlier resumption of business activity than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Minnesotans to wear masks, physically distance, and
avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have
been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission venues. In
addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent community spread. Given
their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid testing (NAT) and allow for
implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic community spread. Information from the
cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In
these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35
year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to people
assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic
COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues
through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the immediate family.
Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be critical to rapid epidemic
spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID cases.
Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and increasing rates
of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all teachers as
another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as cases decline. Encourage institutions
of higher education to test their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MINNESOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MINNESOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MINNESOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MINNESOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Anoka, Washington, Stearns, Clay, Wright, Scott, Kandiyohi, Chisago, Crow Wing, Polk, Beltrami, Todd, Nobles, Douglas,
Hubbard, Mille Lacs, Lyon, Roseau, Chippewa, Cass, Rock, Pine, Aitkin, Clearwater, Marshall, Murray, Houston, Faribault, Kanabec,
Pennington, Yellow Medicine, Pipestone, Mahnomen, Big Stone, Norman, Lincoln, Wilkin, Red Lake
All Orange Counties: Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Sherburne, Morrison, Benton, Otter Tail, Carver, Becker, Itasca, Goodhue, Carlton,
Steele, Wabasha, Wadena, Meeker, Waseca, Renville, Swift, Stevens, Sibley
All Yellow Counties: St. Louis, Olmsted, Winona, Rice, Blue Earth, Isanti, Nicollet, Le Sueur, Mower, Freeborn, Brown, McLeod, Martin,
Dodge, Redwood, Fillmore, Jackson, Pope, Lake, Cottonwood, Lac qui Parle, Kittson, Grant
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MINNESOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MISSISSIPPI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MISSISSIPPI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MISSISSIPPI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MISSISSIPPI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: DeSoto, Harrison, Jackson, Lee, Lauderdale, Marshall, Washington, Leflore, Itawamba,
Tippah, Alcorn, Carroll, George, Tate, Prentiss, Panola, Sunflower, Chickasaw, Lawrence, Scott, Winston,
Humphreys, Franklin, Webster, Tunica
All Yellow Counties: Hinds, Lamar, Forrest, Jones, Monroe, Hancock, Lowndes, Pontotoc, Copiah, Pike,
Yalobusha, Clay, Grenada, Jasper, Calhoun, Newton, Amite, Jefferson Davis
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MISSISSIPPI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MISSOURI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MISSOURI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MISSOURI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MISSOURI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
0 6
Barton
Warren
IN YELLOW N/A
Gasconade
ZONE Cedar
St. Clair
▼ (-1) ■ (+0) Linn
All Red CBSAs: St. Louis, Kansas City, Springfield, Jefferson City, Joplin, Columbia, St. Joseph, Cape Girardeau, Poplar Bluff, Warrensburg, Sikeston, West Plains,
Branson, Lebanon, Maryville, Hannibal, Fort Leonard Wood, Moberly, Kennett, Kirksville, Marshall, Quincy, Fort Madison-Keokuk
All Red Counties: St. Louis, Jackson, St. Charles, Greene, Boone, Cole, Jefferson, Jasper, Franklin, Cape Girardeau, Buchanan, Newton, Christian, Callaway,
Johnson, Butler, Cass, Scott, Camden, Howell, Taney, Lawrence, Laclede, Lincoln, Webster, Miller, Nodaway, Osage, Stoddard, Moniteau, Pulaski, Randolph,
Lafayette, Dunklin, Morgan, Marion, Crawford, Ste. Genevieve, Texas, Madison, Stone, Washington, New Madrid, Adair, Dallas, Bollinger, Saline, Perry, Cooper,
Henry, Pemiscot, Andrew, Wright, DeKalb, McDonald, Sullivan, Ripley, Mississippi, Vernon, Hickory, Maries, Pike, Dent, Shannon, Livingston, Montgomery, Monroe,
Lewis, Oregon, Carter, Ozark, Daviess, Carroll, Macon, Howard, Douglas, Caldwell, Ralls, Harrison, Reynolds, Iron, Gentry, Clark, Scotland, Holt, Shelby, Chariton
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MISSOURI
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Given the urgency, it is critical to increase adherence to tried and true mitigation strategies and adopt more innovative, promising
interventions. Consider working with advertising or corporate partners with proven success in local markets to develop new
communication strategies.
• Actively enforce social distancing and face covering ordinance and intensify messaging, especially in the highest burden counties
where hospital capacity is limited. Expand use of local hospital or clinical staff as part of coordinated strong public advocacy for
community mitigation behaviors.
• Testing needs to be expanded to reach asymptomatic young adults to curb transmission and innovative testing strategies using
rapid tests should be deployed in social and commercial environments.
• Monitor contact tracing capacity to ensure all cases are immediately isolated and interviewed within 48 hours of diagnosis; if
necessary, expand contact tracing capacity by focusing the interview, developing scripts and clear algorithms, task-shifting, and
coordinating remote surge capacity from districts with lower case rates.
• Continue development of surveillance network by increasing use of quantitative wastewater testing at the most local levels and by
routinely testing selected staff who are at increased risk of infection such as teachers, transportation drivers, clinical staff and those
who work in congregate settings, regardless of symptoms. These staff should be regularly tested with rapid antigen tests and
should not be permitted to work with clients unless they have a recent negative rapid test.
• Consider seeking contract medical staffing where needed through coordinating with state and federal partners and through
programs as GSA's VA medical provider contract, BCFS Medical and Health Care, or other contracted health and medical services.
• Local facilities should expedite supply delivery by developing contracts with partners outside of the state health department.
• In advance of the holidays, expand messaging across all media platforms (including automated SMS) to educate vulnerable
individuals and their families about the risks of transmission from familial or smaller social gatherings and make clear
recommendations to avoid all such gatherings and crowded public spaces, especially for those at increased risk of severe disease.
• All institutions of higher education should post details of testing on their website, including testing volume, positivity, and trends
and should implement strict community mitigation efforts on campus and punishing violations with suspension.
• Tribal Nations: develop weekly testing of all tribal communities, regardless of symptoms. Ensure quick return of results (within 48
hours), scaling up rapid antigen tests wherever transmission is most intense. Ensure sufficient facilities for isolation and quarantine
and adequate delivery of food, water, and laundry services.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MONTANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
MONTANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
MONTANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
MONTANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 1 Lincoln
■ (+0) ▼ (-1)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ▼ (-1)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red Counties: Yellowstone, Flathead, Gallatin, Cascade, Missoula, Lewis and Clark, Hill, Roosevelt, Glacier,
Big Horn, Ravalli, Silver Bow, Lake, Deer Lodge, Valley, Blaine, Richland, Custer, Dawson, Powell, Toole, Fergus,
Park, Stillwater, Rosebud, Carbon, Beaverhead, Musselshell, Jefferson, Carter, Broadwater, Madison, Chouteau,
Phillips, Fallon, Sheridan, Teton, Meagher, Sweet Grass, Granite, Daniels
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
MONTANA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEBRASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEBRASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEBRASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEBRASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
1 Lincoln 3 Douglas
Red Willow
Richardson
■ (+0) ▼ (-3)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 2 Lancaster
Jefferson
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red Counties: Sarpy, Buffalo, Hall, Madison, Scotts Bluff, Platte, Lincoln, Dodge, York, Adams, Gage, Dakota, Dawson,
Washington, Cass, Saline, Holt, Saunders, Phelps, Wayne, Box Butte, Colfax, Seward, Butler, Otoe, Cuming, Custer, Dawes,
Pierce, Webster, Chase, Polk, Clay, Nuckolls, Sheridan, Hamilton, Knox, Cheyenne, Antelope, Fillmore, Merrick, Burt, Morrill,
Howard, Boone, Furnas, Cedar, Keith, Nance, Valley, Boyd, Dixon, Kimball, Johnson, Hitchcock, Stanton, Thayer, Harlan,
Garden, Sherman, Garfield, Brown, Cherry
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEBRASKA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEVADA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEVADA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEVADA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEVADA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
5 5
Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise Clark
IN RED Reno
Elko
Washoe
Elko
ZONE Pahrump Nye
▲ (+2) Fallon
▲ (+1) Churchill
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
3 Fernley
Gardnerville Ranchos
Winnemucca
3 Lyon
Douglas
Humboldt
▼ (-1) ▼ (-1)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
1 Carson City 1 Carson City
▼ (-1) ▼ (-3)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEVADA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the concern of New Hampshire leaders that the state’s current favorable situation may be difficult to maintain given the gradual
increase in cases; the increase in hospitalizations and in test positivity despite increased testing supports ongoing increases in disease
transmission. The current period offers a time window to add additional mitigation activities and limit potential increases in cases,
hospitalizations, and deaths.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Granite Staters to wear masks, physically
distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in
the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Surge staffing for long term care facilities (LTCFs) may be an increasing problem. Transfer of patients and/or staff between LTCFs within
networks could be useful in addressing this if the risk of spread of virus could be mitigated, possibly with the use of repeated testing with
rapid antigen tests. The state support strike teams could be strengthened by recruitment of nursing staff laid off due to the cancellation of
elective surgeries.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. Recommend continuing vigilance for transmission events after restrictions were eased for inside dining, especially given multiple
recent restaurant clusters. Collection of contact information to support contact tracing is commended.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts
to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID
cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and
increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely test all
teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as cases decline. Encourage
institutions of higher education to test their student body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family
and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW JERSEY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEW JERSEY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEW JERSEY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW JERSEY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Essex
LOCALITIES
3 7
Union
IN YELLOW Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
Atlantic City-Hammonton
Hudson
Middlesex
ZONE Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton Passaic
▲ (+2) ▲ (+3) Atlantic
Gloucester
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW JERSEY
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW MEXICO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEW MEXICO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEW MEXICO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW MEXICO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
3 5
Santa Fe
IN ORANGE Albuquerque
Santa Fe
McKinley
Socorro
ZONE Gallup Sierra
▲ (+2) ▲ (+2) Hidalgo
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
3 Farmington
Española
Taos
3 San Juan
Rio Arriba
Taos
▼ (-2) ▼ (-4)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW MEXICO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW YORK
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NEW YORK
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NEW YORK
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW YORK
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
1 Elmira 1 Chemung
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
1 Binghamton 2 Broome
Tioga
▼ (-1) ▼ (-1)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NEW YORK
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Expansion of testing is commendable and will be critical if transmission increases into the winter; efforts to expand testing should
continue until all counties are testing at least 2,000 people per 100,000 population each week.
• Ensure a tight surveillance net through quantitative wastewater testing at the most local level to guide mitigation and testing
efforts.
• Utilize rapid antigen testing for populations at critical risk for transmitting to vulnerable populations (e.g., clinical staff and staff
who work in any congregate settings, such as homeless shelters and long term care facilities (LTCFs)) and ensure all results, positive
and negative, are captured and reported. Clinical staff and staff at LTCFs should not be permitted to work with residents or patients
unless they have a recent negative test result.
• Prioritize testing of vulnerable populations and those who work or live with them.
• Closely monitor local hospital utilization rates and monitor test positivity rate by age group.
• In counties with elevated case rates among children and adolescents, develop plans and intensify messaging to prevent
spread to older family members during the holidays.
• In counties with elevated hospital utilization and case rates in the elderly, implement stronger mitigation restrictions and
expansion plans whenever inpatient bed or ICU utilization exceeds 90% (or 85% in catchment areas with evidence of
accelerating transmission in residents over 65 years-old).
• Continue outreach to all churches that have resumed in-person services with strong messaging about increasing transmission and
the potentially deadly risks for older persons; monitor and urge compliance with occupancy and mitigation policies.
• Monitor and enforce guidance at voting centers.
• Ensure that groups at higher risk for infection, including Black, Hispanic, and Native American communities (the latter in Robeson,
Swain, and Scotland counties), are reached with specific messaging/education, adequate contact tracing and provision of spaces
and supplies for isolation/quarantine; target those at higher risk for severe disease, such as those over age 65, with clear
recommendations to maintain social distancing at all times and to avoid even small, familial social gatherings.
• Work with all state and private institutions of higher education to ensure testing is done before students return home for the
holidays.
• LTCFs should be a priority focus; intensify efforts at nursing homes with 3 or more cases of COVID among staff and/or residents per
week over any of the past 3 weeks and ensure all have had facility wide testing (using rapid tests for staff) and mandatory
inspection surveys conducted to ensure strict adherence to CMS guidance.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Yellow CBSAs: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, Raleigh-Cary, Greensboro-High Point, Winston-Salem, Asheville, Wilmington, Burlington, Goldsboro,
Greenville, Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, Kinston, Pinehurst-Southern Pines, Forest City, Morehead City, Rockingham, Marion
All Red Counties: Gaston, Cumberland, Catawba, Robeson, Onslow, Wilson, Surry, Alexander, Pender, Lee, Halifax, Yadkin, Columbus, Hoke, Avery,
Madison, Swain, Clay, Perquimans
All Orange Counties: Johnston, Randolph, Nash, Caldwell, Cleveland, Rockingham, Lincoln, Edgecombe, Craven, Sampson, Wilkes, Jackson, Beaufort,
Scotland, Greene, Franklin, Caswell, Montgomery, Pasquotank, Warren, Chowan, Cherokee, Transylvania, Mitchell, Alleghany, Pamlico
All Yellow Counties: Mecklenburg, Wake, Guilford, Forsyth, Alamance, Wayne, Pitt, New Hanover, Union, Davidson, Cabarrus, Rowan, Harnett, Lenoir,
Burke, Henderson, Moore, Rutherford, Carteret, Richmond, Duplin, McDowell, Granville, Person, Chatham, Davie, Ashe, Bladen, Martin, Yancey, Macon,
Haywood, Bertie, Northampton, Anson, Polk, Washington, Jones
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• New hospital admissions in North Dakota continue the unrelenting week over week rise, suggesting the foci of expanding
community spread still exist and need to be identified and controlled.
• North Dakota must expand mitigation in all counties with rising cases and hospitalizations either with local or statewide
requirements. Mitigation efforts should continue to include wearing masks in public; physical distancing; hand hygiene; avoiding or
eliminating the opportunities for mask-less crowding in public, including bars; limiting all private social gatherings to the
immediate household; and ensuring flu immunizations.
• North Dakota must increase surveillance for silent community spread. Use the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests as weekly
repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent (asymptomatic) community spread among community college
students; K-12 teachers; students over 18; all hospital staff; staff working at nursing homes, assisted living, and other congregate
living settings; prison staff; and first responders. Triangulate all these new positives to specific geographic locations and create
testing incentives to increase testing of all community members; target all 18-35 year-old age groups to identify the highly
contagious silent viral spreaders. All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests
conducted; these must be reported as COVID cases and isolated.
• Unrelenting and significant community spread is initiated by social gatherings among friends and family. People must remember
that seemingly uninfected family members and friends may be infected but asymptomatic. Exposure to asymptomatic cases can
easily lead to spread as people unmask in private gatherings. There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community
spread. Recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert through the media, including social media, by noting the exposure history of
recent admissions; in other words, the percent of most recent hospital admissions who were infected at gatherings with family and
friends.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no
further outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to
hometowns for the holiday season.
• The infection rate among long-term care facility (LTCF) staff continues to escalate, reaching one positive staff member at 66% of all
LTCFs. This demonstrates the breadth and depth of the unrelenting and uncontrolled community spread. Additional efforts in
mitigation and testing must focus on both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
• Ensure all nursing homes, assisted living, and elderly care sites have full testing capacity and are isolating positive staff and
residents.
• Institute weekly testing of all members of Tribal Nations on reservations to stop both the asymptomatic, as well as symptomatic,
community spread. It is critical to identify the asymptomatic spreaders; universities that contact traced symptomatic individuals
and tested to find viral positive, asymptomatic students decreased community spread by 97% compared to colleges that only
diagnosed symptomatic students and contact traced.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NORTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
NORTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
NORTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NORTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
Burleigh
LOCALITIES
1 8
Morton
Mercer
IN ORANGE Bismarck
Ramsey
ZONE Foster
Eddy
▲ (+1) ▲ (+3) Bowman
Hettinger
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
1 Jamestown 4 Stutsman
Traill
Barnes
Dunn
▼ (-1) ▼ (-8)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red Counties: Cass, Ward, Grand Forks, Williams, Walsh, McLean, McKenzie, Mountrail, Richland, Rolette,
Bottineau, Dickey, Benson, Ransom, Wells, LaMoure, McHenry, Pembina, Pierce, Sioux, Towner, Adams, Oliver,
Kidder, Sargent, Burke, Sheridan, Cavalier, Steele, Griggs, Renville
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
NORTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
OHIO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
OHIO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
OHIO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
OHIO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Dayton-Kettering, Lima, Wooster, Wapakoneta, New Philadelphia-Dover, Celina, Athens, Findlay, Marion, Greenville, Sidney, Cambridge, Jackson,
Wilmington, Mount Vernon, Defiance, Van Wert, Bellefontaine, Ashland, Coshocton
All Yellow CBSAs: Columbus, Cleveland-Elyria, Toledo, Canton-Massillon, Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Springfield, Zanesville, Portsmouth, Huntington-Ashland,
Salem, Sandusky, Fremont, Tiffin, Marietta, Urbana, Wheeling, Point Pleasant
All Red Counties: Butler, Warren, Greene, Allen, Wayne, Miami, Putnam, Auglaize, Tuscarawas, Mercer, Holmes, Athens, Hancock, Marion, Darke, Shelby, Highland,
Fulton, Preble, Guernsey, Geauga, Jackson, Clinton, Henry, Knox, Defiance, Williams, Van Wert, Morrow, Logan, Ashland, Paulding, Coshocton, Noble, Hardin,
Wyandot, Carroll, Meigs
All Orange Counties: Hamilton, Montgomery, Summit, Clermont, Licking, Fairfield, Delaware, Lake, Ross, Portage, Richland, Pickaway, Crawford, Fayette, Brown,
Ottawa, Monroe
All Yellow Counties: Franklin, Cuyahoga, Lucas, Stark, Clark, Lorain, Medina, Trumbull, Muskingum, Scioto, Lawrence, Columbiana, Erie, Union, Sandusky, Seneca,
Washington, Champaign, Belmont, Gallia, Perry, Vinton
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
OHIO
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
OKLAHOMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
OKLAHOMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
OKLAHOMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
OKLAHOMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
Payne
LOCALITIES
3 8
Pontotoc
Seminole
IN ORANGE Ada
Stillwater
Osage
ZONE Fort Smith
Adair
Craig
▼ (-2) ▼ (-3) Woods
Pawnee
LOCALITIES
1 5
Logan
IN YELLOW McAlester
Pittsburg
Atoka
ZONE Kiowa
▼ (-1) ▼ (-7) Love
All Red CBSAs: Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Lawton, Shawnee, Enid, Durant, Muskogee, Ardmore, Bartlesville, Miami, Duncan,
Weatherford, Altus, Elk City, Tahlequah, Guymon, Ponca City, Woodward
All Red Counties: Oklahoma, Tulsa, Cleveland, Canadian, Comanche, Pottawatomie, Garfield, Bryan, Rogers, Okfuskee, Le
Flore, Grady, McClain, Muskogee, Wagoner, Okmulgee, Delaware, Creek, Washington, Carter, Ottawa, McCurtain, Stephens,
Garvin, Custer, Jackson, Beckham, Sequoyah, Caddo, Lincoln, Mayes, Cherokee, Texas, Kay, Kingfisher, McIntosh, Murray,
Woodward, Choctaw, Hughes, Nowata, Major, Haskell, Washita, Pushmataha, Johnston, Blaine, Latimer, Grant, Alfalfa,
Tillman, Coal, Harmon
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
OKLAHOMA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
OREGON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
OREGON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
OREGON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
OREGON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
1 Ontario 3 Malheur
Wallowa
Lake
■ (+0) ▲ (+2)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
3 Medford
Hermiston-Pendleton
Bend
4 Washington
Jackson
Umatilla
Deschutes
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Multnomah
LOCALITIES
4 7
Marion
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
IN YELLOW Salem
Clackamas
Yamhill
ZONE Prineville
Astoria
Crook
▲ (+1) ▲ (+2) Baker
Clatsop
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
OREGON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
PENNSYLVANIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
PENNSYLVANIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
PENNSYLVANIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
PENNSYLVANIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
4 6
Bradford
Sayre Franklin
IN RED Chambersburg-Waynesboro Indiana
ZONE Indiana
Oil City
Armstrong
Venango
▲ (+3) ▲ (+5) Fulton
LOCALITIES
4 6
Berks
Reading Lebanon
IN ORANGE Lebanon Schuylkill
ZONE Pottsville
Huntingdon
Huntingdon
Bedford
▲ (+1) ▲ (+1) Jefferson
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington Philadelphia
Pittsburgh Delaware
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre Westmoreland
LOCALITIES
17 26
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton Lancaster
Harrisburg-Carlisle York
IN YELLOW Lancaster Luzerne
ZONE York-Hanover
State College
Bucks
Lackawanna
▲ (+3) Altoona ▲ (+3) Centre
Erie Dauphin
Sunbury Lehigh
New Castle Washington
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
PENNSYLVANIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
RHODE ISLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
RHODE ISLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
RHODE ISLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RHODE ISLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
RHODE ISLAND
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
Greenville
LOCALITIES
2 7
Pickens
IN RED Greenville-Anderson
Anderson
Cherokee
ZONE Gaffney
Laurens
▼ (-2) ▼ (-7) Chester
Jasper
York
LOCALITIES
5 8
Oconee
Augusta-Richmond County
Lancaster
IN ORANGE Seneca
Greenwood
Greenwood
ZONE Newberry
Newberry
Marlboro
▼ (-2) Bennettsville
▼ (-5) Bamberg
Saluda
Spartanburg
Horry
Columbia
Charleston
Charleston-North Charleston
LOCALITIES
9 22
Lexington
Spartanburg
Aiken
IN YELLOW Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia Berkeley
ZONE Florence Florence
Dorchester
Georgetown
▲ (+4) Sumter ▲ (+14) Georgetown
Orangeburg Kershaw
Darlington
Sumter
All Yellow Counties: Spartanburg, Horry, Charleston, Lexington, Aiken, Berkeley, Florence, Dorchester,
Georgetown, Kershaw, Darlington, Sumter, Marion, Orangeburg, Chesterfield, Colleton, Dillon, Barnwell,
Williamsburg, Edgefield, Fairfield, McCormick
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 3 Codington
Grant
Ziebach
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
2 6
Yankton
Haakon
IN YELLOW Watertown Potter
ZONE Yankton Edmunds
McPherson
▲ (+1) ▲ (+1) Jerauld
All Red Counties: Minnehaha, Pennington, Lincoln, Bon Homme, Brown, Brookings, Davison, Lawrence, Beadle,
Meade, Todd, Hughes, Union, Turner, Butte, Clay, Dewey, Lake, Charles Mix, Brule, McCook, Roberts, Custer,
Kingsbury, Spink, Corson, Walworth, Faulk, Fall River, Hutchinson, Moody, Gregory, Lyman, Jackson, Clark,
Deuel, Aurora, Hand, Day, Sanborn, Harding, Stanley, Hanson, Mellette
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
TENNESSEE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
TENNESSEE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
TENNESSEE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
TENNESSEE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, Chattanooga, Johnson City, Kingsport-Bristol, Cookeville, Dyersburg, Sevierville, Greeneville,
Cleveland, Lawrenceburg, Union City, Shelbyville, Newport, Martin, Brownsville, Dayton, Paris
All Red Counties: Rutherford, Hamilton, Williamson, Sullivan, Washington, Sumner, Wilson, Maury, Putnam, Dyer, Sevier, Greene, Bradley, Lawrence,
Tipton, Carter, Roane, Fayette, Obion, Dickson, Lauderdale, Monroe, Bedford, Robertson, Overton, Cocke, Loudon, Crockett, White, Weakley, Cheatham,
Lincoln, Macon, Fentress, Marion, Haywood, Smith, Lewis, Rhea, Johnson, Unicoi, Perry, Grundy, Grainger, DeKalb, Henderson, Henry, Hickman, Bledsoe,
Humphreys, Union, Pickett, Jackson, Decatur, Polk, Cannon, Stewart, Trousdale, Houston, Meigs, Moore, Chester, Van Buren, Hancock
All Orange Counties: Knox, Montgomery, Blount, Madison, Coffee, Anderson, McMinn, Hamblen, Hawkins, Warren, Marshall, Cumberland, Gibson,
Hardeman, Franklin, Giles, McNairy, Scott, Sequatchie, Lake
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
TENNESSEE
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• It also shows significant deterioration in the Sunbelt, including Texas, as mitigation efforts were decreased over the past 5 weeks.
• New hospital admissions in Texas are high and have plateaued at this high level, suggesting the foci of expanding community
spread still exist and need to be identified and controlled.
• Texas must expand mitigation in all counties with rising cases and hospitalizations either with local or statewide requirements.
Mitigation efforts should continue to include wearing masks in public; physical distancing; hand hygiene; avoiding or eliminating
the opportunities for mask-less crowding in public and limiting all private social gatherings to the immediate household; and
ensuring flu immunizations.
• Texas must increase surveillance for silent community spread. Use the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests as weekly repeat
surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent (asymptomatic) community spread among community college
students; K-12 teachers; students over 18; all hospital staff; staff working at nursing homes, assisted living, and other congregate
living settings; prison staff; and first responders. Triangulate all these new positives to specific geographic locations and create
testing incentives to increase testing of all community members; target all 18-35 year old age groups to identify the highly
contagious silent viral spreaders. All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests
conducted; these must be reported as COVID cases and isolated.
• Unrelenting and significant community spread is initiated by social gatherings among friends and family. People must remember
that seemingly uninfected family members and friends may be infected but asymptomatic. Exposure to asymptomatic cases can
easily lead to spread as people unmask in private gatherings. There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community
spread. Recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert through the media, including social media, by noting the exposure history of
recent admissions; in other words, the percent of most recent hospital admissions who were infected at gatherings with family and
friends.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no
further outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to
hometowns for the holiday season.
• The infection rate of long-term care facility (LTCF) staff continues to escalate, reaching 25% of all LTCF. This demonstrates the
breadth and depth of the unrelenting and uncontrolled community spread. Additional efforts in mitigation, as well as testing of
both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, must occur.
• Ensure all nursing homes, assisted living, and elderly care sites have full testing capacity and are isolating positive staff and
residents.
• Institute weekly testing of all members of Tribal Nations on reservations to stop both the asymptomatic, as well as symptomatic,
community spread. It is critical to identify the asymptomatic spreaders; universities that contact traced symptomatic individuals
and tested to find viral positive, asymptomatic students decreased community spread by 97% compared to colleges that only
diagnosed symptomatic students and contact traced.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
TEXAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
TEXAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
TEXAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
TEXAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red CBSAs: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, El Paso, Lubbock, Amarillo, Wichita Falls, Midland, Odessa, Plainview, Texarkana, Paris, Eagle Pass, Levelland, Lamesa, Snyder, Sulphur Springs, Big Spring,
Athens, Granbury, Andrews, Pampa, Stephenville, Sweetwater, Dumas, Mineral Wells, Hereford, Pecos
All Orange CBSAs: McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Waco, Laredo, Sherman-Denison, Abilene, Longview, Tyler, Del Rio, Huntsville, Victoria, Mount Pleasant, Vernon, Gainesville, Bonham, El Campo, Beeville,
Raymondville
All Yellow CBSAs: Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, San Antonio-New Braunfels, Beaumont-Port Arthur, Brownsville-Harlingen, Corpus Christi, San Angelo, Alice, Brownwood, Nacogdoches, Rio Grande
City-Roma, Corsicana, Palestine, Port Lavaca, Borger, Jacksonville, Brenham, Bay City, Kingsville, Uvalde, Zapata
All Red Counties: El Paso, Tarrant, Dallas, Lubbock, Randall, Wichita, Potter, Midland, Ector, Hale, Johnson, Bowie, Lamar, Maverick, Parker, Hockley, Dawson, Scurry, Hopkins, Terry, Howard, Henderson,
Young, Lamb, Hood, Andrews, Gaines, Gray, Ochiltree, Lavaca, Erath, Cass, Nolan, Parmer, Moore, Palo Pinto, Deaf Smith, Burleson, Pecos, Mitchell, Montague, Lynn, Presidio, Coke, Bailey, Zavala,
Culberson, Archer, Reeves, Eastland, Castro, Hudspeth, Cochran, Yoakum, Menard, Clay, Morris, Fisher, Callahan, Camp, Wheeler, Ward, Stephens
All Orange Counties: Hidalgo, Collin, Denton, Montgomery, Webb, Grayson, Ellis, Taylor, Smith, Kaufman, Val Verde, Hunt, Gregg, Hardin, Walker, Harrison, Wise, Victoria, Chambers, Wilbarger, Hill, Titus,
Falls, Van Zandt, Dallam, Cooke, Rusk, Fannin, Wood, Gonzales, Panola, Bosque, Wharton, Bee, McCulloch, Houston, Willacy, Hamilton, Jackson, Tyler, Brooks, Rains, Sabine
All Yellow Counties: Harris, Bexar, McLennan, Cameron, Fort Bend, Brazoria, Galveston, Jefferson, Nueces, Burnet, Tom Green, Rockwall, Comal, Guadalupe, Brown, Jim Wells, Starr, Nacogdoches, Navarro,
Anderson, Waller, Upshur, Calhoun, Leon, Caldwell, Hutchinson, Cherokee, San Patricio, Washington, Hemphill, Matagorda, Medina, Comanche, Llano, Liberty, Kleberg, Uvalde, Fayette, Winkler, Shelby,
Runnels, Zapata
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
TEXAS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
UTAH
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
UTAH
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
UTAH
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
UTAH
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 2 Emery
Millard
▼ (-2) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red Counties: Salt Lake, Utah, Davis, Weber, Washington, Cache, Tooele, Box Elder, Summit, Wasatch,
Sanpete, Iron, Sevier, Uintah, San Juan, Carbon, Juab, Morgan, Duchesne, Beaver
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
UTAH
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• Vermont has been extraordinarily successful with limiting transmission due to a well-designed set of gradated mitigation measures
and enhanced disease control capacity including greatly expanded testing and contact tracing capacity. However, there is cause for
concern given the continued uptick in the state, the more marked increases in the region, and the arrival of colder weather. The
current period offers a time window to add additional mitigation activities and limit potential increases in cases, hospitalizations,
and deaths. Additional measures could include communications to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and enhanced
surveillance among asymptomatic young adults.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county
mitigation levels. Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Vermonters to
wear masks, physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital
personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic
acid testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent
community spread among community college students; K-12 teachers; students over 18; staff working at nursing homes, assisted
living, and other congregate living settings; prison staff; and first responders and all hospital personnel. Information from the cases
identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high transmission zip codes or venues for
additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to maximize testing for
asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives. Maximizing control of transmission will
allow for earlier resumption of business activity in addition to limiting hospitalizations and deaths.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not
followed due to people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have
symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple
people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for
asymptomatic infections.
• Public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the immediate family. Maintaining
or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be critical to rapid
epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported
as COVID cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however,
given the high and increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely
test all teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic
cases and cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student
body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
VERMONT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
VERMONT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
VERMONT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
VERMONT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
0 N/A 0 N/A
■ (+0) ■ (+0)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
VERMONT
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• It also shows significant deterioration in the Sunbelt as mitigation efforts were decreased over the past 5 weeks.
• New hospital admissions in Virginia are increasing, suggesting the foci of ongoing community spread are continuing. This also
indicates that silent spread among younger age groups has been occurring over the past several weeks. Hospitalizations and
fatalities will once again rise if the current spread is not mitigated.
• Virginia must expand mitigation in the counties with rising cases and hospitalizations. Mitigation efforts should continue to include
wearing masks in public; physical distancing; hand hygiene; avoiding or eliminating the opportunities for mask-less crowding in
public, including bars, and limiting all private social gatherings to the immediate household; and ensuring flu immunizations.
• Virginia must increase surveillance for silent community spread by identifying the younger individuals with asymptomatic, mild,
and pre-symptomatic infections. Use the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests as weekly repeat surveillance in critical
populations to monitor degree of silent (asymptomatic) community spread among community college students; K-12 teachers;
students over 18; all hospital staff; staff working at nursing homes, assisted living, and other congregate living settings; prison staff;
and first responders. Triangulate all these new positives to specific geographic locations and create testing incentives to increase
testing of all community members; target all 18-35 year-old age groups to identify the highly contagious silent viral spreaders. All
antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; these must be reported as
COVID cases and isolated.
• Unrelenting and significant community spread is initiated by social gatherings among friends and family. People must remember
that seemingly uninfected family members and friends may be infected but asymptomatic. Exposure to asymptomatic cases can
easily lead to spread as people unmask in private gatherings. There needs to be specific messaging about this type of community
spread. Recruit hospital personnel to raise the alert through the media, including social media, by noting the exposure history of
recent admissions; in other words, the percent of most recent hospital admissions who were infected at gatherings with family and
friends.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no
further outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to
hometowns for the holiday season.
• Ensure all nursing homes, assisted living, and elderly care sites have full testing capacity and are isolating positive staff and
residents. There continue to be high levels of positive staff members at long-term care facilities. These cases are indicative of
continued and unmitigated community spread in these geographic locations.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
All Red Counties: Prince William, Roanoke City, Roanoke, Franklin, Bedford, Washington, Campbell, Prince George, Pittsylvania, Scott, Henry, Wise, Lee,
Radford City, Tazewell, Russell, Amherst, Prince Edward, Dinwiddie, Carroll, Bristol City, Botetourt, Buchanan, Martinsville City, Grayson, Franklin City,
Charlotte, Giles, Dickenson, Emporia City, Galax City
All Orange Counties: Fairfax, Chesterfield, Loudoun, Lynchburg City, Salem City, Danville City, Rockingham, Petersburg City, Halifax, Warren, Manassas
City, Powhatan, Wythe, Appomattox, Westmoreland, Pulaski, Colonial Heights City, Alleghany, Manassas Park City
All Yellow Counties: Virginia Beach City, Henrico, Montgomery, Richmond City, Norfolk City, Alexandria City, Harrisonburg City, Hanover, Spotsylvania,
Suffolk City, Augusta, Shenandoah, Southampton, Winchester City, Hopewell City, Mecklenburg, Orange, Nottoway, Caroline, Page, Buckingham, King
William, Northumberland, King George
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations,
and fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase
exponentially. These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in
many areas and that partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased
fatalities.
• We share the concern of Washington health leadership that the current increase in disease activity will cause serious increases in
avoidable cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. Washington has been successful with limiting transmission with gradated mitigation
measures and enhanced disease control capacity including expanded testing. The current period offers a time window to add
additional mitigation activities. Additional measures could include communications to reinforce messaging around social
gatherings and enhanced surveillance among asymptomatic young adults.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county
mitigation levels. Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Washingtonians
to wear masks, physically distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital
personnel are frequently trusted in the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic
acid testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of silent
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify
high transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and
businesses to maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
Maximizing control of transmission will allow for earlier resumption of business activity in addition to limiting hospitalizations and
deaths.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not
followed due to people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have
symptoms. Highly infectious asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple
people in a single gathering. Increase efforts to address these venues and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the
immediate family. Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that
appear to be critical to rapid epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported
as COVID cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however,
given the high and increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines, including mask wearing, and utilizing the Abbott BinaxNOW tests to routinely
test all teachers as another indicator of the degree of community spread to further increase mitigation efforts.
• Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further outbreaks on or off campus as symptomatic
cases and cases identified through surveillance testing decline. Encourage institutions of higher education to test their student
body before they leave campus for Thanksgiving break to mitigate exposure to family and community.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WASHINGTON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
WASHINGTON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
WASHINGTON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
1 Lewiston 1 Asotin
▼ (-1) ▼ (-2)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
2 Yakima
Walla Walla 4 Yakima
Walla Walla
Okanogan
Stevens
▲ (+1) ▲ (+1)
Spokane
Spokane-Spokane Valley
LOCALITIES
7 8
Clark
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
Benton
IN YELLOW Kennewick-Richland
Moses Lake
Franklin
ZONE Pullman
Grant
Whitman
▲ (+1) Wenatchee
Centralia
▲ (+2) Lewis
Chelan
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WASHINGTON
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WEST VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
WEST VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
WEST VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
WEST VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN RED
ZONE
0 N/A 2 Mingo
Wetzel
■ (+0) ▼ (-1)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 1 Wyoming
▼ (-1) ▼ (-1)
Berkeley
Mercer
Huntington-Ashland Wood
LOCALITIES
8 18
Hagerstown-Martinsburg Wayne
Wheeling Marshall
IN YELLOW Bluefield Jefferson
ZONE Parkersburg-Vienna
Mount Gay-Shamrock
Boone
Brooke
▲ (+2) Point Pleasant ▲ (+8) Logan
Winchester Upshur
Monroe
Morgan
All Yellow Counties: Berkeley, Mercer, Wood, Wayne, Marshall, Jefferson, Boone, Brooke, Logan, Upshur,
Monroe, Morgan, Lincoln, Mineral, Roane, Webster, Tyler, Pleasants
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WEST VIRGINIA
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• We share the strong concern of Wisconsin leaders that the current situation is severe and continues to worsen; additional government action
and community engagement can limit further cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. The Governor’s continued personal guidance on these
measures is critical and is commended.
• At this point, the continued increase in cases and test positivity throughout Wisconsin indicates that additional measures should be taken in
addition to upward adjustment of mitigation to avoid falling behind the rapid spread. Additional measures should include communications
to reinforce messaging around social gatherings and a new asymptomatic surveillance approach.
• Changes in mitigation measures should be taken in response to changes in local disease activity. Given the trajectory of disease activity,
efforts to keep less intense mitigation levels are unlikely to succeed and will continue to result in high levels of preventable morbidity and
mortality. Initiating appropriate levels of mitigation now will allow for earlier control of disease and earlier resumption of business activity
than a lagging upward adjustment.
• Mitigation measures to limit transmission in personal gatherings need further strengthening beyond adjustment of county mitigation levels.
Communication from state, local, and community leaders of a clear and shared message asking Wisconsinites to wear masks, physically
distance, and avoid gatherings in both public and private spaces, especially indoors, is needed. Hospital personnel are frequently trusted in
the community and have been successfully recruited to amplify these messages locally.
• Continue to use testing and case investigations strategically to identify and mitigate areas of increasing disease activity and transmission
venues. In addition to testing symptomatic individuals and their contacts, devote resources to rapidly increase surveillance for silent
community spread. Given their ease of use at sites, the Abbott BinaxNOW or other antigen tests should be used to augment nucleic acid
testing (NAT) and allow for implementation of weekly repeat surveillance in critical populations to monitor degree of asymptomatic
community spread. Information from the cases identified and available wastewater surveillance data should be used to identify high
transmission zip codes or venues for additional testing. In these high transmission localities, work with local communities and businesses to
maximize testing for asymptomatic spread, especially among 18-35 year olds, potentially including incentives.
• Community spread continues at social and family gatherings where observance of social distancing and mask wearing is not followed due to
people assuming that “healthy” family members and friends are not infected with COVID since they do not have symptoms. Highly infectious
asymptomatic COVID individuals then cause ongoing transmission, frequently infecting multiple people in a single gathering. Increase efforts
to address these venues through communication and pivot to surveillance for asymptomatic infections.
• In red and orange counties, both public and private gatherings should be as small as possible and optimally, not extend beyond the
immediate family. Maintaining or increasing restrictions on indoor gathering sizes will help limit the superspreader events that appear to be
critical to rapid epidemic spread.
• All antigen results must be reported with both the number of positive results and total tests conducted; positives must be reported as COVID
cases. Confirmation of positives identified by antigen testing among asymptomatic individuals with NAT is ideal; however, given the high and
increasing rates of disease transmission, the positive predictive value of an antigen test is increased as well.
• Ensure all K-12 schools are following CDC guidelines. Ensure university students continue their mitigation behaviors to ensure no further
outbreaks on or off campus. Ensure appropriate testing and behavior change in the 10 days prior to student departure to hometowns for the
holiday season.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WISCONSIN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
WISCONSIN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
WISCONSIN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
WISCONSIN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
0 N/A 4 Iowa
Douglas
Buffalo
Iron
▼ (-4) ▼ (-4)
LOCALITIES
2 5
Dane
IN YELLOW Madison
Pierce
Crawford
ZONE Duluth
Bayfield
▼ (-2) ▼ (-3) Ashland
All Red CBSAs: Milwaukee-Waukesha, Green Bay, Appleton, Oshkosh-Neenah, Wausau-Weston, Racine, Sheboygan, Eau Claire, Janesville-Beloit, Fond du
Lac, Beaver Dam, Manitowoc, Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Shawano, Stevens Point, Watertown-Fort Atkinson, Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, La Crosse-
Onalaska, Wisconsin Rapids-Marshfield, Whitewater, Baraboo, Platteville, Marinette, Menomonie, Iron Mountain
All Red Counties: Milwaukee, Brown, Waukesha, Winnebago, Outagamie, Marathon, Racine, Sheboygan, Rock, Fond du Lac, Dodge, Washington,
Manitowoc, Kenosha, Eau Claire, Portage, Waupaca, Jefferson, Chippewa, Shawano, Calumet, La Crosse, Ozaukee, Columbia, St. Croix, Wood, Oconto,
Walworth, Sauk, Grant, Marinette, Langlade, Barron, Oneida, Lincoln, Waushara, Monroe, Clark, Door, Green Lake, Dunn, Jackson, Kewaunee, Green,
Marquette, Trempealeau, Juneau, Adams, Vilas, Polk, Taylor, Richland, Vernon, Lafayette, Menominee, Price, Rusk, Forest, Washburn, Florence, Pepin
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have incomplete data due to
delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported directly by the state. Data
is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data through 10/28/2020. We understand that the data shown may be incomplete or
inaccurate until data issues are resolved.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WISCONSIN
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
RECOMMENDATIONS
• As you can see from the time sequence of maps at the back of your packet, there is a continued increase in cases, hospitalizations, and
fatalities nationally, spreading southward from the coldest climates as the population moves indoors and cases increase exponentially.
These maps demonstrate the previous impact of comprehensive mitigation efforts when implemented effectively in many areas and that
partial or incomplete mitigation leads to prolonged community spread, hospitalizations, and increased fatalities.
• Given the extreme case rate and increasing test positivity, it is critical to pivot from current approach to implementation of tried and true
mitigation strategies and adoption of more innovative, locally effective interventions. Consider working with advertising or corporate
partners with proven success in local markets to develop new communication strategies.
• The intensity of spread can be limited by effectively implementing proven mitigation interventions, which generally track with unambiguous
policy; face mask requirement in Laramie is a critical advance, but transmission is accelerating across the state. Recommend tighter
restrictions on commercial indoor occupancy and promotion and enforcement of face covering ordinances state-wide.
• Uptake of mitigation strategies should be monitored and messaging intensified where adherence is low; expand use of local hospital or
clinical staff as part of strong public advocacy for community mitigation behaviors.
• Testing should be expanded until it exceeds 2,000 per 100,000 population per week in all counties. Testing needs to reach asymptomatic
young adults to curb transmission; innovative testing strategies using rapid tests should be deployed in social and commercial
environments.
• Monitor contact tracing capacity to ensure all cases are immediately isolated and interviewed within 48 hours of diagnosis; if necessary,
expand contact tracing capacity by focusing the interview, developing scripts and clear algorithms, task-shifting, and coordinating remote
surge capacity from districts with lower case rates.
• Continue development of surveillance network in lower transmission counties by increasing use of quantitative wastewater testing at the
most local levels and by routinely testing selected staff who are at increased risk of infection, regardless of symptoms.
• Staff who are in a position to transmit disease, particularly to vulnerable populations (e.g., clinical staff, drivers, and staff that work in long-
term care facilities (LTCFs) or other congregate settings), should be regularly tested with rapid antigen tests and should not be permitted to
work with clients unless they have a recent rapid test negative.
• In areas with critical staff shortage, explore contract medical staffing through such programs as GSA's VA medical provider contract, BCFS
Medical and Health Care, or other contracted health and medical services.
• In advance of the holidays, expand messaging across all media platforms (including automated SMS) to educate vulnerable individuals and
their families about the risks of transmission from familial or smaller social gatherings and make clear recommendations to avoid all such
gatherings and crowded public spaces, especially for those at increased risk of severe disease.
• All institutions of higher education (IHE) should post details of testing on their website, including testing volume, positivity, and trends and
should implement strict community mitigation efforts on campus and punishing violations with suspension. All IHE should have plans to test
all students before they return home.
• Ensure strict adherence to CDC school policy guidance to curb transmission, including use of face coverings for all K-12 students and
teachers.
• Expand culturally-specific messaging to at-risk groups (Hispanic community) and ensure adequate contact tracing and availability of
isolation/quarantine facilities and supplies.
• Tribal Nations: develop weekly testing of all tribal communities, regardless of symptoms. Ensure quick return of results (within 48 hours),
scaling up rapid antigen tests wherever transmission is most intense. Ensure sufficient facilities for isolation and quarantine and adequate
delivery of food, water, and laundry services.
• Specific, detailed guidance on community mitigation measures can be found on the CDC website.
The purpose of this report is to develop a shared understanding of the current status of the pandemic at the national, regional, state and
local levels. We recognize that data at the state level may differ from that available at the federal level. Our objective is to use consistent
data sources and methods that allow for comparisons to be made across localities. We appreciate your continued support in identifying data COVID-19
discrepancies and improving data completeness and sharing across systems. We look forward to your feedback.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WYOMING
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
STATE, % CHANGE
FROM PREVIOUS FEMA/HHS
STATE WEEK REGION UNITED STATES
WYOMING
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
NEW CASES
TESTING
WYOMING
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
WYOMING
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COVID-19 COUNTY AND METRO ALERTS*
Top 12 shown in table (full lists below)
LOCALITIES
IN ORANGE
ZONE
1 Cheyenne 2 Laramie
Sublette
▲ (+1) ▲ (+1)
LOCALITIES
IN YELLOW
ZONE
2 Laramie
Rock Springs 3 Albany
Sweetwater
Carbon
■ (+0) ▲ (+1)
Change from previous week’s alerts: ▲ Increase ■ Stable ▼ Decrease
All Red Counties: Natrona, Campbell, Fremont, Sheridan, Park, Big Horn, Converse, Teton, Weston, Uinta,
Lincoln, Platte, Johnson, Goshen
* Localities with fewer than 10 cases last week have been excluded from these alerts.
Note: Lists of red, orange, and yellow localities are sorted by the number of new cases in the last 3 weeks, from highest to lowest. Some dates may have
incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes.
DATA SOURCES – Additional data details available under METHODS
Cases and Deaths: State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from USAFacts; therefore, the values may not match those reported
directly by the state. Data is through 10/30/2020.
Testing: HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through
10/28/2020.
COVID-19 Issue 20
WYOMING
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
National Picture
NEW CASES PER 100,000 NATIONAL RANKING OF NEW
CASES PER 100,000
National National
Rank State Rank State
1 ND 27 NC
2 SD 28 TX
3 WI 29 WV
4 MT 30 CT
5 WY 31 SC
6 IA 32 FL
7 AK 33 AL
8 NE 34 MA
9 UT 35 NJ
10 ID 36 PA
11 KS 37 AZ
12 IL 38 DE
13 MN 39 GA
14 NM 40 VA
15 IN 41 MD
16 TN 42 DC
17 RI 43 CA
18 KY 44 LA
19 MO 45 OR
20 AR 46 NY
21 CO 47 WA
22 MI 48 NH
23 NV 49 HI
24 OK 50 ME
25 MS 51 VT
26 OH
DATA SOURCES
Note: Some dates may have incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week
changes.
Cases: County-level data from USAFacts through 10/30/2020. The week one month before is 9/26 - 10/2; the week two months before is
8/29 - 9/4; the week three months before is 8/1 - 8/7.
COVID-19 Issue 20
National Picture
VIRAL (RT-PCR) LAB TEST POSITIVITY NATIONAL RANKING OF TEST
POSITIVITY
National National
Rank State Rank State
1 MT 27 SC
2 SD 28 MI
3 ID 29 CO
4 UT 30 NC
5 IA 31 OR
6 KS 32 AZ
7 NE 33 FL
8 WI 34 PA
9 ND 35 OH
10 MO 36 NJ
11 OK 37 CT
12 NV 38 LA
13 NM 39 MD
14 TN 40 WV
15 TX 41 WA
16 IN 42 CA
17 MN 43 DE
18 AL 44 RI
19 KY 45 NH
20 MS 46 HI
21 IL 47 MA
22 WY 48 NY
23 AK 49 DC
24 VA 50 ME
25 AR 51 VT
26 GA
DATA SOURCES
Note: Some dates may have incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week
changes.
Testing: Combination of CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health department-reported data and HHS Protect laboratory
data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) through 10/28/2020. Tthe
week one month before is 9/24 - 9/30; the week two months before is 8/27 - 9/2; the week three months before is 7/30 - 8/5.
COVID-19 Issue 20
National Picture
NEW DEATHS PER 100,000 NATIONAL RANKING OF NEW
DEATHS PER 100,000
National National
Rank State Rank State
1 ND 27 MI
2 MT 28 KY
3 SD 29 AK
4 WI 30 FL
5 TN 31 WV
6 AR 32 AL
7 MO 33 NV
8 ID 34 PA
9 WY 35 VA
10 MS 36 CO
11 IN 37 CT
12 NE 38 UT
13 IA 39 MD
14 DE 40 AZ
15 SC 41 WA
16 IL 42 OH
17 OK 43 NH
18 RI 44 CA
19 NM 45 NJ
20 MN 46 NY
21 MA 47 HI
22 NC 48 OR
23 LA 49 DC
24 TX 50 ME
25 GA 51 VT
26 KS
DATA SOURCES
Note: Some dates may have incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week
changes.
Deaths: County-level data from USAFacts through 10/30/2020. The week one month before is 9/26 - 10/2; the week two months before is
8/29 - 9/4; the week three months before is 8/1 - 8/7.
COVID-19 Issue 20
METHODS
STATE REPORT | 11.01.2020
COLOR THRESHOLDS: Results for each indicator should be taken in context of the findings for related indicators (e.g.,
changes in case incidence and testing volume). Values are rounded before color classification.
Metric Dark Green Light Green Yellow Orange Red
New cases per 100,000 population per week ≤4 5–9 10 – 50 51 – 100 ≥101
Percent change in new cases per 100,000 population ≤-26% -25% – -11% -10% – 0% 1% – 10% ≥11%
Diagnostic test result positivity rate ≤2.9% 3.0% – 4.9% 5.0% – 7.9% 8.0% – 10.0% ≥10.1%
Change in test positivity ≤-2.1% -2.0% – -0.6% -0.5% – 0.0% 0.1% – 0.5% ≥0.6%
Total diagnostic tests resulted per 100,000 population ≥2001 1001 – 2000 750 – 1000 500 – 749 ≤499
per week
Percent change in tests per 100,000 population ≥26% 11% – 25% 1% – 10% -10% – 0% ≤-11%
COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 population per week 0.0 0.1 – 1.0 1.1 – 2.0 ≥2.1
Percent change in deaths per 100,000 population ≤-26% -25% – -11% -10% – 0% 1% – 10% ≥11%
Change in SNFs with at least one resident COVID-19 ≤-2% -1% – 1% ≥2%
case, death
DATA NOTES
• Some dates may have incomplete data due to delays in reporting. Data may be backfilled over time, resulting in week-to-week changes. It is critical that
states provide as up-to-date data as possible.
• Cases and deaths: County-level data from USAFacts as of 18:13 EST on 11/01/2020. State values are calculated by aggregating county-level data from
USAFacts; therefore, values may not match those reported directly by the state. Data are reviewed on a daily basis against internal and verified external
sources and, if needed, adjusted. Last week data are from 10/24 to 10/30; previous week data are from 10/17 to 10/23; the week one month before data are
from 9/26 to 10/2.
• Testing: The data presented represent viral COVID-19 laboratory diagnostic and screening test (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR)
results—not individual people—and exclude antibody and antigen tests, unless stated otherwise. CELR (COVID-19 Electronic Lab Reporting) state health
department-reported data are used to describe county-level viral COVID-19 laboratory test (RT-PCR) result totals when information is available on patients’
county of residence or healthcare providers’ practice location. HHS Protect laboratory data (provided directly to Federal Government from public health
labs, hospital labs, and commercial labs) are used otherwise. Some states did not report on certain days, which may affect the total number of tests resulted
and positivity rate values. Because the data are deidentified, total viral (RT-PCR) laboratory tests are the number of tests performed, not the number of
individuals tested. Viral (RT-PCR) laboratory test positivity rate is the number of positive tests divided by the number of tests performed and resulted.
Resulted tests are assigned to a timeframe based on this hierarchy of test-related dates: 1. test date; 2. result date; 3. specimen received date; 4. specimen
collection date. Resulted tests are assigned to a county based on a hierarchy of test-related locations: 1. patient residency; 2. provider facility location; 3.
ordering facility location; 4. performing organization location. States may calculate test positivity other using other methods. Last week data are from 10/22
to 10/28; previous week data are from 10/15 to 10/21; the week one month before data are from 9/24 to 9/30. HHS Protect data is recent as of 10:22 EST on
11/01/2020. Testing data are inclusive of everything received and processed by the CELR system as of 19:00 EDT on 10/31/2020.
• Hospitalizations: Unified hospitalization dataset in HHS Protect. This figure may differ from state data due to differences in hospital lists and reporting
between federal and state systems. These data exclude psychiatric, rehabilitation, and religious non-medical hospitals. In addition, hospitals explicitly
identified by states/regions as those from which we should not expect reports were excluded from the percent reporting figure. The data presented
represents raw data provided; we are working diligently with state liaisons to improve reporting consistency. Data is recent as of 18:40 EST on 11/01/2020.
• Hospital PPE: Unified hospitalization dataset in HHS Protect. This figure may differ from state data due to differences in hospital lists and reporting between
federal and state systems. These data exclude psychiatric, rehabilitation, and religious non-medical hospitals. In addition, hospitals explicitly identified by
states/regions as those from which we should not expect reports were excluded from the percent reporting figure. Data is recent as of 18:58 EDT on
10/31/2020.
• Skilled Nursing Facilities: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Data report resident and staff cases independently. Quality checks are performed on
data submitted to the NHSN. Data that fail these quality checks or appear inconsistent with surveillance protocols may be excluded from analyses. Data
presented in this report are more recent than data publicly posted by CMS. Last week is 10/19-10/25, previous week is 10/12-10/18. Facilities that are
undergoing reporting quality review are not included in the table, but may be included in other NHSN analyses.
• County and Metro Area Color Categorizations
• Red Zone: Those core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) and counties that during the last week reported both new cases at or above 101 per 100,000
population, and a lab test positivity result at or above 10.1%.
• Orange Zone: Those CBSAs and counties that during the last week reported both new cases between 51–100 per 100,000 population, and a lab test
positivity result between 8.0–10.0%, or one of those two conditions and one condition qualifying as being in the “Red Zone.”
• Yellow Zone: Those CBSAs and counties that during the last week reported both new cases between 10–50 per 100,000 population, and a lab test
positivity result between 5.0–7.9%, or one of those two conditions and one condition qualifying as being in the “Orange Zone” or “Red Zone.”