Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Anwers

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

5 -Were the findings reported in a consistent and clear format?

6 -Did the article fail to acknowledge and explain any limitations?

7-Was the logic clear and were claims properly supported with convincing data?

8 -Did you spot any fallacies?

In this article the researchers used the different method to show that myzostomida are not
annelids and on their findings we can see that there is the consistency of the results , though the
researchers used different formats clearly to prove their study. The findings have only one outcome.
Looking on the researchers article it seems like it’s very complicated because of many methods used, but
the researchers explained the results in a very detailed way and also acknowledge everything that’s need
to be acknowledge like the references that the researchers used for this article. Analysing this article each
logic, results and words used in this article is supported by different data that is convincing and that
clearly stated and was proven. Through reviewing and analysing the researchers done this article
properly. The researchers make sure that every words in this article is a fact by using methods and
finding references for this article to be verified.

You might also like