Historical Fictions....
Historical Fictions....
Historical Fictions....
The contradiction, or rather ‘complicity’ as the author puts it, between the history
of the Orient world that fairly embodies fiction in it and the vision of the Western
historical literature which has over the time changed the face of the Orient
history or rather has led to its diminishing is the point under consideration in
Aparna Dharwadker ‘Historical Fiction and Postcolonial Representation: Reading
Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq. To be precise, the author is using the drama ‘Tughlaq’ to
get home her idea of how the post-colonial historical literature has rather
become history fictions.
Karnad’s Tughlaq revolves around the astounding Delhi Sultanate ruler
Muhammad Bin Tughlaq, who was so ill fortunate that he is often regarded as the
most unsuccessful kings of India. The decisions of Tughlaq that backfired includes
his decision to transfer his capital to Daulatabad, the abolishing of differentiated
taxation systems for people of different faiths, etc. However, the play tries to
draw parallel to the post-colonial era of India. It also brings to the fore the
ideological differences of the Orientalists and the medieval Muslim historians in
explaining the period of medieval history of India.
The contradiction of the way the Muslim historians of the medieval period
explained and judged the rule of Tughlaq and the modern oriental historians
judged the same as the main cause that necessitated the British rule and thereby
the death of the Sultanate rule in India. The stark contrast in the narrative of the
two groups as to the cruelty inflicted by Tughlaq on his people, where one says is
because he was not religious while the other uses it to impose the supremacy of
their philosophy on the other, itself explains how influenced the noting of history
has been biased over the periods.
The narrative of Tughlaq also goes on to draw a parallel between the post-colonial
Indian administration and the ruling period of Tughlaq. Although the author goes
on stressing that this play is not to draw out any character I the modern India, it
so happens that the play has been drawing parallels to the different periods in the
Indian history ranging from Nehru to Indira Gandhi to the latest rulers. The play,
though it appears to be a fictional narrative of the Tughlaq period, it draws
parallels to post-colonial India as well.
The author uses this play as an instrument to demonstrate how the historical
fictions and their representation in the modern period is totally different to one
another. The very essential of the essay is intended at the point that the literature
form of history may often be different from the real happenings at the ground
level and how these variations may be effected due to the inclination of the
author or the authors to the incident and how they wish to picturize this incident
safeguarding their opinion.
NEELIMA.L