(1) Castillo owned land that was claimed by the Philippine Tourism Authority (PTA).
(2) Castillo entered a contract to conditionally sell the land to Olivarez Realty Corporation. Olivarez failed to fully pay the purchase price or clear the land of tenants.
(3) The Supreme Court characterized the contract as a contract to sell rather than conditional sale. It cancelled the contract and ordered Olivarez to return the land to Castillo along with damages.
(1) Castillo owned land that was claimed by the Philippine Tourism Authority (PTA).
(2) Castillo entered a contract to conditionally sell the land to Olivarez Realty Corporation. Olivarez failed to fully pay the purchase price or clear the land of tenants.
(3) The Supreme Court characterized the contract as a contract to sell rather than conditional sale. It cancelled the contract and ordered Olivarez to return the land to Castillo along with damages.
(1) Castillo owned land that was claimed by the Philippine Tourism Authority (PTA).
(2) Castillo entered a contract to conditionally sell the land to Olivarez Realty Corporation. Olivarez failed to fully pay the purchase price or clear the land of tenants.
(3) The Supreme Court characterized the contract as a contract to sell rather than conditional sale. It cancelled the contract and ordered Olivarez to return the land to Castillo along with damages.
(1) Castillo owned land that was claimed by the Philippine Tourism Authority (PTA).
(2) Castillo entered a contract to conditionally sell the land to Olivarez Realty Corporation. Olivarez failed to fully pay the purchase price or clear the land of tenants.
(3) The Supreme Court characterized the contract as a contract to sell rather than conditional sale. It cancelled the contract and ordered Olivarez to return the land to Castillo along with damages.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
OLIVAREZ REALTY CORPORATION and Olivarez Realty failed to comply with the
DR. PABLO R. OLIVAREZ, Petitioner, conditions, to wit: a) pay the full purchase
vs. price; b) failed to file any action against PTA; BENJAMIN CASTILLO, Respondent. c) failed to clear the land of the tenants nor paying them disturbance compensation. For FACTS: Castillo was the owner of a parcel of breaching the contract, Castillo prayed for land covered by TCT 19972. The Philippine rescission of contract under Art. 1191 of Civil Tourism Authority allegedly claimed Code, plus damages. ownership of the same parcel of land based on TCT 18493. In their defense, Olivarez Realty alleged that Castillo failed to fully assist in filing the Castillo and Olivarez Realty Corporation, action against PTA; that Castillo failed to represented by Dr. Pablo Olivarez, entered clear the property of the tenants within 6 into a contract of conditional sale over months from the signing of the deed. Thus, the property. The details were as follows: they had all the legal right to withhold the subsequent payments to fully pay the 1. Under the deed of conditional sale, purchase price. Castillo agreed to sell his property to Olivarez Realty; with Olivarez Realty RTC and CA ruled that Olivarez Realty delivering the downpayment and the rest breached the contract and ordered the to be paid in 30 equal monthly rescission of the sale plus damages. installments; That the parties would receive a decision voiding the PTA’s title ISSUE: to the property. 1. WON rescission of the contract is 2. Under the same deed, Olivarez Realty will proper; WON the contract was a file the action against PTA with full Contract to Sell or a Contract of assistance of Castillo; and that should the Conditional Sale petition be denied, Castillo shall reimburse all the amounts paid by RULING: NO. SC characterized the contract Olivarez Realty. as a contract to sell, not a contract of conditional sale. 3. Under the same contract, Olivarez Realty undertook to pay the legitimate tenants Contract to sell Contract of conditional of the land disturbance compensation, Sale while Castillo undertook to clear the land transfer of title the buyer of the tenants within 6 months from the to the automatically signing of the deed; that should Castillo prospective acquires title to the fail to clear the land within 6 months, buyer is not property upon full Olivarez Realty may suspend its monthly automatic. “The payment of the downpayment until the tenants vacate prospective purchase price. This the property. seller must transfer of title is “by convey title to operation of law without 4. The parties agreed that Olivarez Realty the property any further act having to Corporation may immediately occupy the through a deed be performed by the property upon signing of the deed. of conditional seller.” Should the contract be cancelled, Olivarez sale. Realty Corporation agreed to return the not governed our laws on sales under property’s possession to Castillo and by our law on the Civil Code of the forfeit all the improvements it may have sales but by the Philippines apply introduced on the property. Civil Code provisions on conditional obligations.
The distinction is important to determine the
applicable laws and remedies in case a party does not fulfill his or her obligations under the contract.
Specifically, Article 1191 of the Civil Code
on the right to rescind reciprocal obligations does not apply to contracts to sell.
Failure to fully pay the purchase price in
contracts to sell is not the breach of contract under Art. 1191.
Failure to fully pay the purchase price is
merely an event which prevents the seller’s obligation to convey title from acquiring binding force. This is because there can be no rescission of an obligation that is still nonexistent, the suspensive condition (the condition of having the buyer pay the full purchase price) having not happened.
In this case, Castillo reserved his title to the
property and undertook to execute a deed of absolute sale upon Olivarez Realty Corporation’s full payment of the purchase price.
Since Castillo still has to execute a deed of
absolute sale to Olivarez Realty Corporation upon full payment of the purchase price, the transfer of title is not automatic.
As this case involves a contract to sell,
Article 1191 of the Civil Code of the Philippines does not apply. The contract to sell is instead cancelled, and the parties shall stand as if the obligation to sell never existed.
SC cancelled the deed of conditional sale.
Olivarez Realty was ordered to return to Castillo the possession of property, together with all improvements that it introduced. Olivarez Realty was also ordered to pay moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees to Castillo.