Assignment #5
Assignment #5
2. What are the limitations on the right of choice of the debtor in alternative obligations?
Illustrate one such limitation.
According to Article 1200. The right of choice belongs to the debtor, unless it has been
expressly granted to the creditor. The debtor shall have no right to choose those prestations
which are impossible, unlawful or which could not have been the object of obligation.
According to Article 1202. The debtor shall lose the right of choice when among the
prestations whereby he is alternatively bound, only one is practicable. And according to
Article 1192. In case both parties have committed a breach of the obligation, the liability of
the first infractor shall be equitably tempered by the courts. If it cannot be determined which
of the parties first violated the contract, the same shall be deemed extinguished, and each
shall bear his own damages.
3. Give the situation when the debtor is given the option either to exercise his right of
choice or to rescind the contract with damages.
According to Article 1203. If through the creditor’s acts the debtor cannot make a choice
according to the terms of the obligation, the latter may rescind the contract with damages.
5. If there are two or more debtors in one and the same obligation, is thor liability joint or
solidary? Explain.
According to Article 1207. The concurrence of two or more creditors or of two or more
debtors in one and the same obligation does not imply that each one of the former has a right
to demand, or that each one of the latter is bound to render, entire compliance with the
prestation. There is a solidary liability only when the obligation expressly so states, or when
the law or the nature of the obligation requires solidarity. And according to Article 1208. If
from the law, or the nature or the wording of the obligations to which of the preceding article
refers the contrary does not appear, the credit or debt shall be presumed to be divided into as
many equal shares as there are creditors or debtors, the credits or debts being considered
distinct from one another, subject to the Rules of Court governing the multiplicity of suits.
6. X,Y, and Z bind themselves to pay W P30,000. Only X received the money as per
agreement between X,Y, and Z. On the due date of the obligation, has W the right to
demand the full payment of P30,000 from Z alone?
W has no right to demand the full payment of P30,000 from Z alone because according to
Article 1207. The concurrence of two or more creditors or of two or more debtors in one and
the same obligation does not imply that each one of the former has a right to demand, or that
each one of the latter is bound to render, entire compliance with the prestation.
11. A and B bind themselves to pay C their loan of P10,000 on a certain date. Is the
obligation divisible or indivisible?
The obligation is indivisible because A and B bind themselves to pay C on a certain date
which is not partial payment.
12. D finds himself to pay his loans of P10,000 in four equal monthly installments. Is the
obligation of D divisible or indivisible?
The obligation is divisible because there D will pay his loan in four monthly installment
which is partial payment.
16. In an obligation with a penal clause, may the creditor still recover damages and interests
in addition to the stipulated penalty?
The creditor may not recover damages and interest because according to Article 1226. If
there is no stipulation to the contrary, the penalty shall substitute the indemnity for damages
and the payment of interest in case of noncompliance. But in this case, there is an addition to
the stipulated penalty.
17. In what cases may the debtor validly object to the enforcement of the stipulated penalty?
According to Article 1227. The debtor cannot exempt himself from the performance of
the obligation by paying the penalty, save in the case where this right has been expressly
reserved for him. Neither can the creditor demand the fulfillment of the obligation and the
satisfaction of the penalty at the same time, unless this right has been clearly granted him.
However, if after the creditor has decided to require the fulfillment of the obligation, the
performance thereof should become impossible without his fault, the penalty may be
enforced.