PROJ6001 - Assessment 1 Brief 9th Feb 2018 Final
PROJ6001 - Assessment 1 Brief 9th Feb 2018 Final
PROJ6001 - Assessment 1 Brief 9th Feb 2018 Final
BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PROJ6001 Integrated Project Management
Context:
Imagine the voluminous processes which are needed to successfully complete a project. As
a project manager, you must see the big picture and coordinate the integration of these
processes throughout a project life cycle (PLC). You begin by considering common elements
to most projects. In addition, you reflect on the process of integration by considering the
steps necessary for beginning a project. For good project management, it is not only
necessary to work towards a successful final project. Each phase of PLC must be designed,
evaluated and assessed based on specific project management approach. As a project
manager, you determine how project management process groups are incorporated into
each phase of project life cycle. These decisions might be based on the ultimate goal and
characteristics of the project, the stakeholders’ objectives or the budget, among other
elements.
Instructions:
In this assessment, students are to work individually or in groups of 3-4 to complete a
project management report to Executive Management using PMBOK (PMI, 2013) as a guide.
Students assign project management roles and responsibilities to the group members.
This assessment is divided into 2 parts.
Learning Resources:
Burke, R. (2013). Project Management Techniques (2nd ed.). US: Burke Publishing.
*The above are suggested learning resources. Students are encouraged and may be
required to search further for specialist resources in order to complete their assessments.
See the learning rubrics in the following pages for details on the assessment criteria
application to new
situations/further learning.
Contribution is
comprehensive, and
advances the group’s task.
Difficult to understand
Information, arguments Information, arguments Expertly presented; the
for audience, no Information, arguments
and evidence are and evidence are well presentation is logical,
logical/clear structure, and evidence are very
presented in a way that presented, mostly clear persuasive, and well
poor flow of ideas, well presented, the
is not always clear and flow of ideas and supported by evidence,
Effective argument lacks presentation is logical,
logical. arguments. demonstrating a clear flow
communication, supporting evidence. clear and well supported
of ideas and arguments.
professionally Attempts are made to by evidence.
No effort is made to The audience is mostly
presented business
keep the audience engaged, line of Engages and sustains
report keep audience engaged, Engages the audience,
engaged, but not always reasoning is easy to audience’s interest in the
audience cannot follow demonstrates cultural
successful. Line of follow. topic, demonstrates high
the line of reasoning. sensitivity.
30% reasoning is often levels of cultural sensitivity.
Little use of presentation difficult to follow. Effective use of Carefully and well
presentation aids. Effective use of diverse
aids, or the presentation prepared presentations
Presentation aids are presentation aids, including
aids and material used aids are used.
used more for effect graphics and multi-media.
are irrelevant than relevance.
Is written according to
academic genre (e.g. Is very well-written and
with introduction, adheres to the academic
Is well-written and
conclusion or summary) genre. Expertly written and adheres
Poorly written with adheres to the academic
and has accurate to the academic genre.
errors in spelling, genre (e.g. with
Use of academic and spelling, grammar, Consistently
grammar. introduction, conclusion
sentence and paragraph demonstrates expert use Demonstrates expert use of
discipline or summary).
construction. of good quality, credible high-quality, credible and
conventions and Demonstrates
and relevant research relevant research sources to
sources of evidence. inconsistent use of good Demonstrates consistent
Demonstrates consistent sources to support and support and develop
Proper referencing quality, credible and use of high quality,
use of credible and develop appropriate arguments and position
relevant research credible and relevant
style. relevant research arguments and statements. Shows extensive
sources to support and research sources to
sources to support and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond
10% develop ideas. support and develop
develop ideas, but these evidence of reading the key reading
ideas.
are not always explicit or beyond the key reading
There are mistakes in
well developed. There are no mistakes in
using the APA style. There are no mistakes in
There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
using the APA style.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
using the APA style.