Module 1 History
Module 1 History
History
is a discipline
It is like liquid, it takes a shape of our minds
Exist thousands of years
Nature of history
Enables individuals to understand the contemporary world since the present is the manifested outcomes of the
past events.
Deals with the narratives of human civilizations, but is not static. It reveals various social context and ideas of
each period.
Assesses the interaction between human civilizations and the forces that led to its sudden development.
Values the process of human development in time, thus focuses on human civilizations and their time.
The historian’s careful analysis, not just narration, of the past’s crucial events and phenomena.
Discussed only events which have relevance and purpose for the contemporary times.
Considers continuity and coherences as essential elements in studying the narratives of human civilizations.
Characterized by a dialogue between the past and emerging future.
Tackles every aspect of human life, thus has the quality of being comprehensive
Multisided in nature which means the discipline should be viewed using different lenses of the societal forces.
History
is either art or science
ability to take the form as science is somehow problematic
focus on extricating the truth, its pieces on evidence are based on the narrative accounts of the past
historians deciphering the past sometimes fail to administer absolute impartiality on given primary sources
scientific and technological advances of 18th century trickled historians’ minds to question whether scientific
methods are applicable to better understand the human past or not
asserts the discipline’s scientific status, stimulating the heated debate about the discipline’s nature
historians employ scientific methods of inquiry which are systematic, sequential, logical, and progressive in
nature before they interpret, construct, or reconstruct the past, scholars are still very much divided in
considering the discipline a branch of science.
It is interdisciplinary in the view of social scientific history with elements to remodel their skills in constructing
and reconstructing the past
discipline is considered a social science, its contribution is perspective
study of the past deals with fact that narratives from across societies varies
it is both art and science
it employs scientific methods in data gathering and analysis and is literary and artistic in presentation
what matters is that it seeks to supply knowledge gaps
discipline’s nature should not be placed at the core of any academic enterprise
essential is the ultimate goal of research – how to commensurate human knowledge from different fields of
learning to combat societal problems and create a peaceful, just, and progressive world
Historiography
refers to the study of historians' methods and practices in writing history
defined the ideas of presented evidence, the rigor and standards of reasoning for historical inquiry.
This historiography
is introduced by Dr. Zeus Salazar
aims to be a guiding philosophy for writing and teaching history in the country.
In context, this follows the notion of “for us – from us” perspective
it highlights the crucial role of language, that is understood by everyone, in facilitating an internal conversation
and discourse regarding Philippine history.
Historical Awareness
historical knowledge necessitates bias treatment of the remains of the past
requires an individual to judge and interpret the past based on its respective standards
acquire strong sense of zeitgeist and historical process recognition
void exercising anachronism
develop skill pertaining to contextual analysis
Propaganda
associated with selfishness, dishonesty, and subversiveness
Marcos exploited the myths of nationalism, imperialism, betrayal, and historical fulfilment in order to justify and
reinforce the declaration of martial law
Historical revisionism
pertains to the manipulation certain historical events mainly for political events.
abandons the application of scientific methods and confuses the borderline between legitimate evidence and
fiction in the process of interpreting history
Post-Modernism
supports the legitimization of multiple truths
when the issue of the sex slaves broke out in the global arena in 1991, Japan countered their claims stating that
these comfort women were wartime prostitutes – giving rise for two conflicting views grounded on a single
event
Revising History
is the historians’ way to correct or update certain historical data based on new findings
reason why each generation has its own version of history or perception of the past
Historical Objectivity
Impartiality is crucial element
Compels historians to process their central question without changing the results
concept of objectivity guides historians to treat and process their historical data in the highest extent of
impartiality
historians depart from treating historical data with bias
resorting to omission and selection of details in attaining desired outcome, and wrongful interpretation.
be able to channel the competence of their historical knowledge to represent the past
historians enforce a strong sense of objectivity, their conclusions may change, just as in science, and may not be
valid at all times
why each generation rewrite and reinterpret its history
primary concern of historians is to provide an almost crystal understanding of the past disengaged from their
biases and prejudices
Branches of History
Focus Scopes
Political History It studies aspects of the past that deal with organization and power
Biography It pertains to the narratives of individuals.
Social History It revolves around the narratives of the society as a whole such as the everyday life at
home, workplace, and the community.
Economic History It deals with earthly necessities.
World History It tells about the rise of societies, emergence of nations, until the age of globalization.
Transnational History It narrates events beyond borders and political jurisdictions.
Local History It deals with the narratives of the common people from the local scale.
Total History It is the interplay of all aspects of human civilization in the long and medium term.
Big History It suggests that historical events are following certain patterns – chain of events
Cultural History It deals with entering the minds of the populace in the creations of a historical narrative.
Uses of History to our Lives
provides us the fundamental and factual information pertaining to the evolution of our society
Through the critical analysis of pieces of historical evidence, historians substantiated the fact that it has the
following uses to the students and their respective societies:
1. Allows you to comprehend the factors that instigated change to the very institution they live in.
2. Adds meaning on what it is really like to be a human being as it develops “beauty and excitement”, and
provides contexts of human societies in the past.
3. Develops the essence of moral understanding, as you are given the opportunity to test their moral sense
against the narratives of the past.
4. Provides you identity as the discipline inculcates among the students the ―distinctive features of national
experience honing their understanding of national values and loyalty.
5. Lays the foundation of ―genuine citizenship.
6. Encourages you to develop, as previously discussed, the habits of mind.
7. Essentially, the discipline cultivates among you the skill to:
7.1 Assess historical data and formulate arguments based on it.
7.2 Determine conflicting interpretations of historical data.
7.3 Identify the dramatic changes brought by the continuity of time.
Primary Sources
any materials or objects; photographed, recorded, written, the object itself made or present during the exact
period of a historical event.
the author or the source of the specific material is a primary witness to the event.
In absence of tangible sources, historians tend to utilize a new trend of extracting information from the elderlies
or direct witnesses through an interview, the oral history.
utilized archaeological and anthropological; and other sources that reflect our society such as bugtong and epics.
Secondary Sources
any printed or motion picture materials that are created using the primary sources.
information is supplied by a person who is not a direct observer or participant of the event, object, or condition.
In the context of historical research, this source is generally scholarly historical books and journal articles that
analyze primary sources.
Other examples are: bibliographies; biographical works; reference books, including dictionaries, encyclopaedias,
and atlases (if the materials used in the making are majority primary sources); literature reviews and other
review articles; commentaries; and works of criticism and interpretation.
Its collection activities began in 1903 in accordance to Act No. 688 of the Philippine Commission initiating the
acquisition and conservation of materials and resources regarding the country’s culture, history, literature, and
linguistics.
De La Salle University
the Marcelino A. Foronda, Jr. Center for Local and Oral History
Located at the Henry Sy, Sr. Hall
has largest collection of oral history in the country with over 5,000 interviews.
Aimed to recognize the inarticulate the Department of History is currently taking steps to make it accessible for
the public in the coming days.
The DLSU Learning commons likewise has a big reservoir of historical materials.
The University of Santo Tomas Miguel de Benavides Library
Has sixteen sections and five branch libraries scattered around the university’scolleges.
It is considered to be the oldest library in our country which contains priceless primary sources particularly
during the Spanish period.
With the advent of the 21st century technology, both primary and secondary sources can now be access digitally. Some
of the noteworthy online scholarly sites that can be used in writing and studying Philippine history include:
1. The Malacañan Presidential Museum and Library Online Archive
http://malacanang.gov.ph/about/full-list-of-resources/
is the repository ―of the history and heritage of the Philippine presidency and government
contains a broad range of preserved historical and digitized materials
like official papers and documents
made available to researchers and students alike…[In addition, it has] documentary films, maps, charts, scanned
and colorized historical photographs, announcements, articles, briefers, timelines, readings, infographic maps,
and commemorative pages available for everyone.
3. The journal of the National Commission for Culture & the Arts, Talas: Interdisciplinary Journal in Cultural Education
https://philippineculturaleducation.com.ph/talas-journal/
It has diverse scholarly articles on cultural education and topics on Philippine history as well.
External Criticism
is the process of knowing the authenticity of the evidence
physical characteristics, consistency with the historical characteristic of the time when it was produced, and the
materials used for evidence.
aims to answer some of the important inquiries regarding the author and source itself:
1. What caused the fabrication of the source?
2. Was the origin of the source questionable?
3. Was the source created or written long after the event?
4. Are there consistencies in terms of time?
5. Is the source an original version, reproduced copy, or translated copy?
6. If undated source, are there significant pieces of evidence such as events, idea, theories, fads and fashion,
names of people and places, style of language and print, kind of ink and paper used, that would lead when and
where the source is produced?
7. Were there pieces of evidence that points to the author’s manifested ignorance that he or she should have
known?
8. Did the author presented events, things, or places that are not existing during the period of the study?
9. Who made the pieces of historical evidence that the author used in the source?
10. Does the source exhibits the author’s heavy reliance on his or her personal observations?
11. Do the sources where the author gathered his or her pieces of evidence be verified by simply looking at the
coherence of the publication dates with the forms and contents?
Internal Criticism
process focuses on the credibility, validity, and worth of the material’s contents
looking at the source of the author, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge which informed
it, and its intended purpose
the following principles are being utilized:
1. Judging a historian of being ignorant of certain events at points inadmissible.
2. Reading and looking historical evidence in contemporary conceptions is erroneous.
3. Identical errors in various pieces of historical evidence signify the dependence on a common source.
4. Underestimating historical evidence is tantamount to overestimating it.
5. Historical evidence may establish the existence of an idea, but should be subjected to independent witnesses
to prove its reality.
6. Comparing the official and unofficial versions of testimonies is of essence for neither one nor the other alone
is sufficient.
7. If primary witnesses contradict at certain points, one of them may be credible, but both are in error.
8. Central historical evidence, with different points of view, sourced from various primary witnesses is
admissible.
9. A historical document may be credible evidence, yet has no weight to others it mentions.