Aircraft Design Report
Aircraft Design Report
Aircraft Design Report
AERODYNAMIC DESIGN
SURVEILLANCE REMOTE CONTROLLED MODEL AIRCRAFT
(FULL REPORT)
Report By (Group 5 ) –
VISHAL KUMAR (AE11M027)
YELLAPPA NAYAK (AE11M028)
SANJEEV CHOURASIA (AE11M023)
SHASHIKANT MAURYA (AE11M024)
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 1
CONTENTS PAGE NO
Chapter 1 MISSION GOAL DECISION & FIRST WEIGHT ESTIMATION 5
Chapter 2 SECOND WEIGHT ESTIMATION 12
Chapter 3 WING LOADING AND THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO 22
Chapter 4 THIRD WEIGHT ESTIMATION 33
Chapter 5 SIZING AND 3D LAYOUT 43
Chapter 6 PROPELLER DESIGN 48
Chapter 7 IMPROVED DRAG POLAR 53
Chapter 8 CALCULATION OF CENTRE OF GRAVITY 61
Chapter 9 Stability Analysis 68
Chapter 10 REVISED PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS 77
Chapter 11 V-N DIAGRAM 86
Chapter 12 FINAL CONFIGURATION 91
REFERENCES 94
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 2
LIST OF SYMBOLS
AR =Aspect ratio
b =Wing span
C =Chord of wing
Cm = Moment Coefficient
Cd = Coefficient of drag (2-D)
CD = Coefficient of drag (3-D)
Cd0 = Zero lift drag coefficient (2-D)
CD0 = Zero lift drag coefficient (3-D)
CHT = Horizontal tail volume coefficient
Cl = Coefficient of lift (2-D)
CL = Coefficient of lift (3-D)
Cl(max) =Maximum coefficient of lift (2-D)
CL(max) =Maximum Coefficient of lift (3-D)
Cp = Coefficient of power
Cr = Root chord of vertical tail
Ct = Coefficient of thrust
Ct = Tip chord of vertical tail
CW = Wing chord in m
=Coefficient of lift at lift-off
= Skin friction coefficient
D =Drag, diameter of propeller
e =Ostwald’s efficiency factor
= Form factor
g = Acceleration due to gravity
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 3
hf = Flare height
hOB =Obstacle height
I =Moment of inertia
J =Advance ratio
L = Lift
LHT = Distance between the quarter chord point of wing & the tail
(L/D)max =Maximum lift to drag ratio
(L/D)VLO =Lift to drag ratio at lift-off
M = Bending moment on wing
n = Load factor
n = Speed of propeller in rps
N =Speed of propeller in rpm
P =Power
q =Dynamic pressure
R =Radius of curvature of flight path, Radius of propeller
S =Wing plan-form area
Sa =Approach distance
Sf =Flare distance
Sg =Ground run
= Horizontal tail length
= Reference surface area
= Wet surface area
T =Thrust
V =Velocity of the aircraft
V∞ = Free stream velocity
Vcruise =Cruise speed
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 4
Vf =Flare speed
VLO = velocity at lift-off
Vmp = Velocity at minimum power condition
Vstall =Stall speed
W = Weight
W0 =Gross weight of the aircraft
WP/L = Pay load weight
WPP =Power-plant weigh
Ws =Structure Weight
θOB =Flight path angle
ρ =Density of air
=allowable stress on wing
= Suffix for horizontal tail
= Suffix for fuselage
= Suffix for vertical tail
= Deflection angle
= Reynolds’s number
=Approach angle
=Flare angle
µ = Coefficient of viscosity
µr =Coefficient of rolling friction
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 5
In the conceptual design phase, the aircraft will be designed in concept without
the precise calculations. In another word, almost all parameters are determined
based on a decision making process and a selection technique. The preliminary
design phase tends to employ the outcomes of a calculation procedure. In the
preliminary design phase, the parameters that are determined are not final and
will be altered later.
o Reconnaissance.
o Traffic monitoring
It is assumed that the preliminary weight estimation has already been carried
out, and the airplane performance and structural capabilities have been worked
out. The preliminary design parameters taken into consideration for design are
given in the table below. These may be altered at a later stage depending on the
better estimate of parameters.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 7
Length ~0.8m
Aspect Ratio ~6 to 8
Thrust/Weight To be decided
Range ~1km
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 8
BlitzRCWorks
1 1.21 1.106 27.3 960 140 65 21.24 95 35.16
MX2 Pro
White Accipiter
3 1.1 0.82 14 500 90 72 32.4 50 35.71
Badius
4 Giant Yak 54 3D 1.5 1.21 43.9 2200 375 170 25.45 220 50.1
Spitfire Mk. Vb
7 0.8255 0.6858 11.80 453.60 137 48.2 40.8 46 38.44
ARF
Yellow Accipiter
9 1.1 0.82 14 500 90 72 32.4 50 35.71
Badius
The payload weights for the chosen existing aircrafts are not specified in the open
literature. Hence, we start with the payload weight is 100 gm. and gross weight
as 1000gm.
The preliminary weight estimation is done by assuming the payload to be 10 % of
the gross weight. Table shows the power-plant ( ) and the empty weights of
the some chosen models aircraft.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 9
From this available data the following two plots are made-
Plot - 1.1
600
Powerplant weight,Wpp(gm)
500
400
300
200
100
y = 0.2421x + 53.267
0 (Wpp/Ws)=0.2421
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Gross weight,Wo(gm)
Plot - 1.2
1200
Structural weight, ws(gm)
1000
800
600
400
The power-plant weight to gross weight ratio (WPP/ W0) and the empty weight to
gross weight ratio (WS/W0) can be obtained from the slopes of the Plot 1 and 2
respectively. It should be noted that the power-plant weight includes the battery,
motor as well as the propeller weight.
From these values the gross weight can now be estimated using the following
relation.
……… (1.1)
1.5 CALCULATIONS
W0 = 1016.260 gm
1.6 CONCLUSION
The initial estimated gross weight is 1016.26 gm for the required payload weight
of 100 gm. This weight estimation is preliminary weight estimation which is likely
to change during further process of design.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 12
For our design and weight estimation consideration we chose different NACA
4digit airfoils and having stalling angle of attack in the range of 13-15 degrees
and under cambered for good low speed lift.
Table 2.1: Parameters of different 4 digit NACA airfoil[10]
Series NACA 1412 NACA 1415 NACA 2421 NACA 2414 NACA 2424
Thickness 12% 14.90% 21% 14% 24%
camber 1% 1% 2% 2% 2%
T.E.angle (deg) 16.5 19.19 28.2 17.8 32.2
Lower flatness 64.90% 30.20% 27.80% 50.50% 17.40%
L.E. radius 3.5 3.3 6.3 3 7.5
1.098 1.146 1.547 1.245 1.581
angle 15 15 15 10.5 15
14.806 41.387 32.261 41.542 33.084
angle 6 6 7.5 6 6.5
CL 0.836 0.817 1.081 0.943 0.95
Stall angle 7 10.5 3.5 10.5 -0.942
Zero AOA -1 -1 2 2 2
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 13
=√
= 9.328m/s
Designed cruising speed = 2*
Designed cruising speed = 18.65m/s
Reynolds’s number =
Sl.No AOA(Degree) Cl Cm Cd
Cl v/s Cd
1.4
1.2
0.8
Cl
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
-0.2
Cd
Plot 2.1 Cl v/s Cd
CI v/s α
1.4
11, 1.303
1.2
0.8
Cl
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-0.2
α
Plot 2.2 CI v/s α
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 16
So, K=
=0.0599
≈0.06
Cd = Cd0+ KCl2
Cd0= KCl2
Cl=
Cl=0.4585
Cd = 0.02523
Cl / Cd = 18.1728
W = 1.016*9.81
= 9.96696 N
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 17
T = 0.54845 N
P=T×V
P = 0.54845 × 18.65
P = 10.228 Watts
2.5 MOTOR
Motor selected - TURNIGY AerodriveXp, Model: TR35-30C
Specification:
2.6 BATTERY[11]
Model: GPMP0504
2.7 PROPELLER
9x6 (length-228.6 cm, pitch-152.4 mm)
Weight : 26 g
This is smallest fly DV on the world! Weight only 80g, bring no overload to your
helicopter or airplane. The Fly Camera is a light video camera that can be used
for
Model air planes, Helicopters, RC cars etc.
Specification:
Easy to Install
High Speed Recording & Quick Light Response
Automatic photographing every 15 second
25 Frames Per Second for 640x480 Video Output
Motion JPEG Video Encoding and MP4 Format
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 20
= 100+80+26+50
Wpp = 256 g.
Wo= Wpl+Wpp+Wstr.
= (Wpl+Wpp)/(1-Wstr/Wo)
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 21
= 1045.521gm
2.11 CONCLUSION
1. NACA 2414 Airfoil is chosen for our aircraft mission.
2. Second weight estimation is done by approximating the ratio of structural
weight to total weight based on previous report.
& Second Weight estimation, = 1045.521gm.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 22
The primary constraints on W/S will be Vstall and landing and we will take that
approach The faster an aircraft flies, the more lift is produced by each unit area
of wing, so a smaller wing can carry the same weight in level flight, operating at a
higher wing loading. Correspondingly, the landing and take-off speeds will be
higher. The high wing loading also decreases maneuverability. The wing loading
determines the design lift coefficient and influences drag through its effect upon
wetted area and wingspan.
L=W
To account for the 3-D effect for the finite aspect ratio, Raymer suggest that, for
finite wings with aspect ratio > 5,
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 23
N/m2
Assuming hOB = 1 m
We are going to use the equation below for the wing loading determination
S=Sg+ Sa
Sa = Approach distance
= 1.15 × 9.38
= 10.787 m/sec
L = 0.5 × ρ × VLO2 × CL
)2
= 0.85029
CD = 0.012615 + 0.06CL2
= 0.012615 + 0.06 (0.85029)2
= 0.05599
Thrust, T = W*(CD/CL)
= 0.675229 N
Radius of take-off,
R = (6.96 × Vstall2)/g
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 25
= 62.423 m
= 10.26 degrees
=11.11 m
Sg = S – Sa
= 50 – 11.11
= 38.881 m
At velocity, V∞ = 0.7VLO
=0.7*10.787
= 7.5509 m/sec
CL(0.7LO) =1.735
CD = 0.012615 + 0.06CL2
CD(0.7LO)= 0.012615 + 0.06 (CL(0.7LO))2
= 0.19322
=0.11154
( ) = 45.385 N/m2
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 26
CL= √ .
= * * *√ .
= 0.5*1.15*18.652*√ .
( ) = 91.7684 N/m2.
3CDo = k .
Cl = 0.7941
CD = 0.05046
CD /CL = 0.06354
Vmp = 0.76*Vmd
= 1.9408 m/s.,
= 0.24367
√
( )=
( ) = 94.135 N/m2
n=( ) ( )max.
( ) = 0.1011
√
( )= .
( ) = 78.89 N/m2
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 28
S = Sa + Sf +Sg.
R= .
=1.23*9.38
=11.5375 m/s
= 0.0929 m.
Approach distance, Sa =
= 17.3307 m.
Assume ~
= 3.5507 m
Hence,
Sg = S - Sa - Sf
= 50 – 17.330 – 3.5507
= 29.1193 m.
Sg ≈ 30m.
We have
𝑊
𝑊 j
𝑆
Sg = j N √ +
𝜌𝑆𝐶𝐿𝑚𝑎𝑥 g 𝜌𝐶𝐿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜇𝑟
where
( ) ( )
30 = 1.1*1.0√ +
( ) = 69.07 N/m2
( ) = 0.05502
Sg=
= .
( ) = 0.11152
= )
= + .
( ) = 0.0578
= )
= .
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 32
( ) = 0.06605
After performing the above calculation based on minimum (W/S) the maximum
(T/W) obtained at takeoff condition.
Hence,
T/W = 0.11152
3.9 CONCLUSION
2
Minimum wing loading, (W/S) = 45.38 N/m
Balsa wood is a very interesting material and is typically used for construction of
model airplanes. Balsa is technically a hard wood, because of the shape of the
leaves. It is not the lightest wood, but it is the lightest wood which has some
strength. Actually Balsa wood’s strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight
ratio is very good, better than any man made material that I am aware of. It is
not considered to be a great material to use for the design of most things
because its properties vary greatly.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 34
= 0.5*45.38*0.16*1*0.25
= 0.9076 Nm
From Table 1,
The imposes load on wing 1.41 greater than level flight load .So Assuming factor
of safety = 3[3*]
= 4.033MPa
Breadth b = 3.378e-03 m
Breadth b ≈ 4mm
= 0.00008
= 150*(area*span)
= 150*0.00008*1
= 0.012 Kg
= 12 gm
= 150*0.328*0.01*0.01
=0.00492 kg
= 20*0.00492
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 37
=0.0984 kg
=98.4 gm
=111.38
Table 4.2 Rules of thumb for determining the parameters for a model aircraft[5]
Assuming cross section of the fuselage as 6cm X 6cm and having a thickness of
5mm.(base on pay load required )
= 0.75m
= 11 cm2
Hence,
= 11e-04*0.75
= 8.25e-04 m3
= 150*8.25e-04
= 0.1237kg
= 123.75gm
= 0.04 m2
= 0.04*0.005
= 2e-04 m3
= 150*2e-04
= 0.03 Kg
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 39
= 30gm
= 60gm
= 0.056 m2
= 0.056*0.005
= 2.8e-04 m3
= 150*2.8e-04
= 0.042 Kg
= 42gm
4.6 SKIN
Assuming the skin thickness to be 1mm
=0.328*1*0.00
=0.000328
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 40
=41*0.000328
=13.5gm
=0.18m2
=0.18*0.001
=0.00018m3
=0.00738kg
=7.38gm
=0.00004m3
=0.00164kg
=1.64gm
=3.28
=0.000056m3
=2.296
Total weight of skin=skin weight of (wing +fuselage+ horizontal tail+ vertical tail)
= 13.5+7.38+3.28+2.296
=26.45gm
COMPONENT WEIGHT(gm)
WING 111.38
FUSELAGE 123.75
HORIZONTAL TAIL 60
VERTICAL TAIL 42
SKIN WEIGHT 26.45
SERVO 45
CASING 50
RECIEVER 6.17
TRI CYCLE LANDING GEAR 70
EMPTY VOLUME FILLING 55
OTHER (glue, bolt, etc.) 20
Table 4.3.component and corresponding weight
4.7 CONCLUSION
The estimated total structural weight is 609.75gm.
Third weight estimation,
gm
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 43
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In the present report the basic geometric details of the aircraft are estimated
based on the last report calculation and a 3D layout has to be drawn on the basis
of this geometric data. Construction consists of using spars and ribs for the wings
and tail surfaces. High wing is used in this model because the wing stays out of
ground effect for most of the time. Also it has better stability than a low wing
aircraft. The wing is unwept.
Table 5.1 gives the horizontal and vertical tail volume coefficient for some
aircrafts.
= 0.2 *750
=150 mm
= 0.65*160
= 104 mm
= 0.040/0.104
= 0.3846 m
Location of tail horizontal wing from main wing nose = 62% of fuselage length [1]
= 0.62* 750
=465 mm
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 45
= 0.014 m2
AR =b2/S
1.4 = b2/0.014
Now, S = b * c
Chord c = 100 mm
S = 0.5*b(Cr + Ct )
2*C = 1.4* Cr
Cr = 142.85 mm
Ct= 57.14 mm
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 46
384
384
5.5 CONCLUSION
A 3D layout is drawn in CATIA and shown the front, side and top view of
the modal aircraft.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 48
6 PROPELLER DESIGN
6.1 INTRODUCTIONS
The function of the propeller is to convert brake horse power from the engine
into thrust. The primary purpose is to convert engine power to axial thrust
through torque transfer to the propeller. To do this there are two types of
propellers are used
(1) Fixed pitch: The propeller is made in one piece. Only one pitch setting is
possible and is usually two blades propeller and is often made of wood or
metal
(2)Constant speed: During operation, the constant speed propeller will
automatically change its blade angle to maintain a constant engine speed. If
engine power is increase, the blade angle is increased to make the propeller
absorb the additional power while the rpm remain constant.
Propeller blades are constructed using aerofoil sections to produce an
aerodynamic force, in a similar manner to a wing. Consequently the blades are
subject to the same aerodynamics – induced drag, parasite drag, wingtip
vortices, lift/drag ratios at varying angle of attack, pressure distribution changing
with angle of attack etc. There is a difference in application because, in flight, the
propeller has rotational velocity added to the translational (forward) velocity,
thus, the flight path of any blade section is a spiral – a helical flight path.
Raymer suggest that, For the purpose of initial sizing an empirical relation for 2
bladed propeller diameter D as a function of engine horsepower(Hp) can be
given as,
P=30 watt
D=22*(30/746)(1/4)
D=9.8518 inches
=25.023cm
25 cm
=12.5 cm
6.2.2 PITCH
The pitch is defined as the distance traveled forward in one revolution if there
were no slippage.Propellers is defined in terms of their diameter and pitch.
By convention the pitch is defined in either inches or millimeters at 75%of the
blade radius. The 75% radius is a fair choice since about half of the thrust of a
propeller occurs on each side of this value. In fact, about 80% of the thrust is
generated by the outer 50% of a blade. Hence
Pitch of propeller =0.75*radius of propeller [5]
=0.75*12.5
= 0.9375cm
6.6 THRUST[7]
2 4
T= Ct×ρ × n × D
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 52
6.9 CONCLUSION
Total 0.7738
CD0 = 0.011807
Re =
Re = 1.73*105
= 0.00319
FFw [ ( ) () () ] … (7.5)
t/c = 0.14
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 56
M = 19.38 / 348.92
M = 0.0555
( )
FFw =1.0498
= 1.0*0.16
= 0.16 m2
Swet,w = 0.328 m2
Re =
= 1.1237*105
Cf,ht =
√
= 0.00396
FFht= [ ( ) () () ]
FFht =1.0039
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 57
Sexposed =0.3846*0.104
= 0.04 m2
Swet,ht = 0.08157 m2
Re =
= 1.0815*105
Cf,vt =
√
= 0.004
FFvt= [ ( ) () () ]
=1.0039
Sexposed =0.056 m2
Swet,vt = 0.1136 m2
7.2.2.4 Fuselage
Re =
Cf,f =
g
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 58
= 0.00465
= 0.1816m2
f= = = 12.5
FFf = 1+ + …………(7.6)
FFf = 1.06197
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 59
Characteristic Swet
Component ( ) Re FFc Qc Cfc
length (m) (m2)
Horizontal 0.1456*10-3
0.104 0.104 1.1237*105 0.08157 1.0039 0.4491 0.00396
tail
Vertical Tail 0.100 0.100 1.0815*105 0.1136 1.0039 0.6255 0.004 0.2853*10-3
Total 3.31146*10-3
= 0.010105
For CDmisc the strut and landing gear are the only components considered
CDL&P = 0.05*(0.010105 )
= 0.50525*10-3
CD0 =0.013172
For a straight wing span the efficiency factor can be estimated by using the
expression below,
Conclusions
Improved Drag profile is calculated as .
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 61
Xrib = 42.19%*x/c
= 0.4219*16
Xspar = 0.3*c
Xspar = 4.8 cm
Since we are using 20 ribs over the whole wing. Which means that there will be
10 ribs in each side.
g g
g g
g g +6
C=0
= 10.4-(2(10.4-10.4)(0.5-10.4+10.4) / (3(10.4+10.4)))
MAC = 10.4
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 64
= %MAC B.P.*(MAC) + C
The balance point(B.P.) is not the Center of Gravity. Generally it is about 25% of
the chord back from the leading edge.
= 0.25*10.4 + 0
= 15 + 46.2 + 2.6
C = 3.67
= 14.28-(2(14.28-5.71)(0.5*14.28+5.71) / (3(14.28+5.71)))
MAC = 10.60
= %MAC B.P.*(MAC) + C
=0.25.*10.6+ 3.67
= 15 + 46.2 + 6.32
g
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 65
g cm
Component Mass (gm) X(cm) from nose tip of Z(cm) from the
the fuselage fuselage base
Landing Gear 35 45 -6
Propeller 13 -2 3
Battery 40 10 1
Payload 50 15 1.4
Since all the loadings are symmetric about X-axis. Therefore ̅ will lie on X-axis.
CONCLUSION
To obtain the stable condition of aircraft we have shifted our wing to 250 mm from the
nose tip of the fuselage. Earlier it was 150mm from the nose tip of the fuselage along
X-axis.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 68
9 Stability Analysis
9.1 INTRODUCTION
Aircraft motion consists of translations and rotations about the center of gravity
(c.g.). The motion includes six degrees of freedom: forward and aft motion,
vertical plunging, lateral translations, pitch, roll, and yaw.
9.2.1 FUSELAGE
The pitching moment coefficient of fuselage, (Ref. Raymer)
where,
Kf = Empirical pitching moment factor
9.2.2 WING
a0 =
a=
̅ = =3.73
= 3.7
a=
=1-
=0.38619
= 1- 0.3638
= 0.6138
= (1 + )
=0.9 [1]
T = Thrust at takeoff
=
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 72
= 0.11152*0.882*9.81
=0.9649 N
=129717 mm2
= 0.9 (1+ )
0.93724
̅ ̅
̅ =
̅ =
=0.4750
̅ = 0.4750 ………..from wing leading-edge
Static- margin = ̅ ̅ cg
= 0.4750 -0.37533
Static- margin = 0.09967
= static-margin = 0.09967
= 4.5781 (
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 73
(̅ ̅ ) (̅ ̅ )
̅ ̅ ̅
(̅ ̅ ) (̅ ̅ )
= ( )
= ( )
= downwash effect
The change in zero lift angle due to a plain flap is given as,
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 74
Therefore
o
=0.9
=0.1682
= 3.8606 )
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 75
= 3.8606
= 0.7352 – 0.5017(3.8606
= -1.20166 -0.01708
=4.5781 3.8606
δf = -30 δf = 00 δf = 30
α(degrees)
0.06
0.04
0.02
CMcg
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
-0.08
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
CLtotal
Conclusion
Static Margin is 0.09967 (9.967%), which is within the limit.
v/s also shows stability of our aircraft (negative slope).
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 77
=√
= 9.094 m/s
10.3 CRUISE SPEED
Cruise Velocity VCruise = 2 *
= 2*9.094
VCruise = 18.189 m/s
10.4 CLIMBING CONDITION
At minimum power condition
=√
=√
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 78
=0.8173
= 4*
= 4*0.01317
=0.05268
( ) =0.8173/0.05268=15.514
=√
=14.772 m/s
Velocity at minimum power,
=0.76*
=11.22 m/s
=6.853 watt
= 22.22 watt
Rate of climbing
VV(max) =
59.232N/m2
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 79
= 1.6537 * 16.975
VH(VV(max)) = 28.0715 m/s
10.5 GLIDING
For minimum sink rate is same as that required for minimum power
condition.
=√
= 0.7469
Corresponding Velocity is given by,
Vmin for sink = 11.744m/s
∴ (L/D)min for sink = 16.975
=3.371o
We are going to use the equation below for the wing loading determination
S=Sg+ Sa
Sa = Approach distance
= 1.15 × 9.094
= 10.4581 m/s
L = 0.5 × ρ × VLO2 × CL
(VLO/Vstall) =Sqrt[(CL(max)/(CL(LO)]=1.15
)2
= 0.9414
CD = 0.01317+ 0.05914CL2
= 0. 01317 + 0.05914( )
= 0.06558
Thrust, T = W*(CD/CL)
= 0.6381N
Radius of take-off,
R = (6.96 × Vstall2)/g
= 58.674 m
= 10.593 degrees
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 81
=10.786 m
Sg = S – Sa
= 50 – 10.786 m
= 39.214 m
At velocity, V∞ = 0.7VLO
=0.7*10.4581
= 7.32067 m/s
(V0.7LO/Vstall) = Sqrt[(CL(max)/(CL(0.7LO)]
CL(0.7VLO) =1.921
CD = 0.01317 + 0.05914CL2
CD(0.7VLO) = 0. 0.01317 + 0.05914 (CL(0.7VLO))2
= 0.2292
=0.1193
( ) = 54.30 N/m2
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 82
CDo = k .
CL= √ .
= * * *√ .
= 0.5*1.15* *√
=81.509
( ) = 81.509 N/m2
S = Sa+ Sf +Sg.
R=
=1.23*9.094
=11.1856 m/s
= 0.0873 m.
Approach distance, Sa =
= 17.439 m.
Assume ~
= 3.337 m
Hence,
Sg = S - Sa - Sf
= 50 – 17.439– 3.337
= 29.224 m.
Sg ≈ 30m.
j
Sg = j N √ +
g
( ) ( )
30 = 1.1*1.0√ +
( ) = 68.530 N/m2
n=( ) ( )max.
( ) = 0.0609
√
( )= .
( ) = 78.98 N/m2
From the above calculations the minimum wing loading is 54.30 N/m2
obtained for takeoff condition.
The minimum wing loading is used to calculate thrust to weight ratio for
different flight conditions as done below.
10.10 ( ) CALCULATIONS
=
( ) = 0.0507
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 85
Sg=
= .
( ) = 0.11929
= ).
= 0.0160+0.0410
( ) = 0.0570
= )
= .
( ) = 0.0619
10.11 CONCLUSION
Using the revised weight and drag polar calculated in earlier reports all
the performance parameters have been calculated at different flight
conditions.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 86
11 V-N DIAGRAM
11.1 INTRODUCTION
V-n diagram is generally used for presenting aircraft lift capabilities and
structural strength limitations. As shown in the figure (1), Assume the airplane is
at an angle of attack such that the angle of attack is increased to obtaining
keeping the velocity at a constant speed.If the angle of attack is increased
further, The wing stalls and the load factor will drop.There will be a point which
represents the highest possible load factor that can be obtained at a given
velocity V1. cannot be allowed to increase indefinitely, Beyond a certain
value of load factor, defined as the positive limit load factor structural damage
may occur to the aircraft. The right hand side of the V-n diagram ,line DE,is a high
speed limit. At velocities greater than this, dynamic pressure becomes so large
that again structural damage may occur to the airplane.
11.2 Calculation of
Where, W is in pound.
W=882.15gm
= 1.945lb
4.59
11.3 Calculation of
Where,
= 1.1*1.245
11.4 Calculation of
11.5 Calculation of
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 89
11.6 Calculation of
√
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 90
11.8 CONCLUSION
On the basis of the above data, we plotted the V-n diagram.
12 FINAL CONFIGURATION
12.1 INTRODUCTION
In the present report the major basic geometric details of the aircraft are
provided based on the previous reports calculation and a 3D layout has been
drawn on the basis of this geometric data.
Dimensions
Wing span 1000 mm
Wing chord 160 mm
Fuselage length 750 mm
Horizontal tail chord 104 mm
Elevator chord length 26 mm
Aileron chord length 40 mm
Propeller 254.6mm X 10.16mm
C.G. location from nose 281.5 mm
of fuselage
Weights
Empty structural weight 526.15 gm
Payload 100 gm
Power plant weight 256 gm
Total weight 882.15 gm
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 92
12.2 CONCLUSION:
A modified 3D layout has been presented in this report.
AS5210 AERODYNAMIC DESIGN 94
REFERENCES
BOOKS
[1] Raymer D. P., “Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach”, AIAA education series.
*2+ Roskam, Jan. “Airplane aerodynamics and performance”, DAR corporation.
*3+ Anderson, John D jr.”Introduction to flight”,Mc Graw Hill book company.
[4] Schilichting, H. and Gersten, H.” Boundary Layer Theory”, Springer
WEBSITES
[5] www.indoorflyingmodel.com/DesignParameters.html
[6]google.co.in/books?id=WgWREfMtdtgC&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=factor+of+safe
ty+for+spar+aircraft+design&source
[7] www.dc-rc.org/pdf/Model Propellers Article.pdf
[8] www.pilotfriend.com/training/flight_training/fxd_wing/props.htm
[9] http://www.bananahobby.com
[10 http://www.worldofkrauss.com/foils/list?criteria=namebeg&letter=N
[11] http://www.electrifly.com/batteries/batteries-lipo.html
[12]http://www.hohotrade.com/fly-dv-micro-video-camera-2gb-for-rc-airplane-
helicoptertcsc30041-p-15652.html
[13] http://physics.info/friction/