Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Business Management Higher Level Paper 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

M17/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX

Business management
Higher level
Paper 1

Friday 28 April 2017 (afternoon)

2 hours 15 minutes

Instructions to candidates
 Do not open this examination paper until instructed to do so.
 A clean copy of the business management case study is required for this examination paper.
 Read the case study carefully.
 A clean copy of the business management formulae sheet is required for this examination
paper.
 Section A: answer two questions.
 Section B: answer question 4.
 Section C: answer question 5.
 A calculator is required for this examination paper.
 The maximum mark for this examination paper is [60 marks].

2217 – 5011
5 pages © International Baccalaureate Organization 2017
–2– M17/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX

Section A

Answer two questions from this section.

1. (a) With reference to Utopia, describe the importance of two external stakeholders
(line 12). [4]

(b) With reference to Utopia, explain the role of promotion (line 6). [6]

2. (a) With reference to JAC, describe two advantages of internal growth (line 52). [4]

(b) With reference to John, explain the key functions of management. [6]

3. (a) With reference to Utopia, describe two suitable sources of finance for the 3D printers
(line 60). [4]

(b) Explain the role of ethics in John’s businesses. [6]


–3– M17/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX

Section B

Answer the following question.

4. Paul’s idea for 3D printing takes Utopia into a secondary sector activity that contrasts with
its usual tertiary sector activities. In order to produce a sufficient number of souvenirs,
Utopia would need to buy ten 3D printers at $1000 each. There would be material costs
and significant operating costs, as well as time and additional labour. Paul has produced a
net cash flow forecast for the project (Table 1) assuming a five year life for the printers. He
likes the idea that each souvenir produced could be of a unique design and personalized.
Some of the materials would be from recycled plastics obtained from waste at the resort.
This example of lean production would be good for the resort’s environment and for Utopia’s
caring image. The cost of recycling is uncertain.

Table 1: Net cash flow for the 3D printing project Table 2: Discount factors

Year Net cash flow (excluding capital Year Discount factor


investment) 1 0.91
1 $2000 2 0.83
2 $3000 3 0.75
3 $4000 4 0.68
4 $4000 5 0.62
5 $4000

Liza does not like the idea of 3D printing. She is concerned that the souvenirs may damage
Utopia’s exclusive brand. She can see difficulties with recruiting someone with both the
necessary IT skills and the ability to make decisions about which types of souvenirs to
produce. She is particularly concerned about the impact on Utopia’s current suppliers of
souvenirs. She thinks that 3D printing is more suited to larger organizations.

John believes that the 3D printing technology will bring other benefits to his businesses.
He can imagine decorations and other useful items being produced for the resort and its
offices.

(a) Describe one method of lean production other than recycling. [2]

(b) With reference to Utopia, explain two benefits of having a strong brand. [4]

(c) Using information from Table 1 and Table 2, calculate the net present value (NPV) for
the 3D printing project. [4]

(d) Using information from the case study, additional information above and your results
from part (c), discuss whether Utopia should proceed with the 3D printing project. [10]

Turn over
–4– M17/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX

Section C

Answer the following question.

5. John felt that the decision about expanding JAC into the international markets of the Pacific
Islands did not depend on the decision about the 3D printing project. However, he decided
that they should not enter the markets at the same time, so they had to choose between
starting with Fiji, Samoa or New Zealand. John stressed to Liza that, as with the construction
of the Utopia villas, the choice of a new international market should strongly consider cultural
influences and norms. For this reason, John favoured Fiji and Samoa over New Zealand,
arguing that they are more culturally similar to Ratu. However, the final decision not being
made, John asked Liza to do some more research into the idea and into the two markets.
The results of her ideas are summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3.

Table 1: Liza’s market research results

Fiji Samoa
Description Consists of over 330 islands, Two large islands.
of which 110 are permanently
inhabited. It covers a huge
area of the Pacific Ocean.
Population (2015) 881 000 190 000
Tourist visitors (2015) 658 000 116 000
GDP per person (2015 $4900 $6200
estimate)
Projected economic growth 4.5 % 1.9 %
Type of economy Developed economy with Largely industrial (58 % of
tourism, forestry, minerals, GDP) and tourism (25 %).
fish and sugar being the Some agriculture including
main industries. growing and exporting coffee
beans.
Coffee drinking culture Predominantly tea drinkers 100 % coffee

[Source: adapted from Index Mundi, Asian Development Bank and Chartsbin.com]

Table 2: Why invest in Fiji? Table 3: Why invest in Samoa?

 Most politically stable country in the region.


 Fiji is a regional and global hub.
 Profits and capital can easily be transferred
 Tax exemptions and tax free regions within
overseas (repatriated).
the country.
 Affordable, productive, flexible English-
 Fibre-optic infrastructure.
speaking skilled labour force available.
 Investment packages available.
 Concessional trade agreements available.

(This question continues on the following page)


–5– M17/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX

(Question 5 continued)

Liza drew up the following decision tree to help clarify the decision process and try to quantify the issues
involved in the decision.

Chance of success Outcome


good 0.6 $9 m

Cost to develop new market Predicted moderate 0.3


outcome $0 m
in Fiji = $2 m
= $4.9 m
poor 0.1 -$5 m
Fiji: Net predicted
outcome = $2.9 m
Samoa: Net predicted
good 0.3 $5 m
outcome = $X

Cost to develop new market Predicted moderate 0.5


outcome $3 m
in Samoa = $1.5 m
= $Y
poor 0.2 $1 m

Using the case study and the additional information on pages 4 and 5, recommend which
of the Pacific Island markets JAC should enter. Completing the decision tree and using the
results could help you in your answer. [20]

You might also like