p1 May 2018
p1 May 2018
p1 May 2018
Business management
Higher level
Paper 1
2 hours 15 minutes
Instructions to candidates
Do not open this examination paper until instructed to do so.
A clean copy of the business management case study is required for this examination paper.
Read the case study carefully.
A clean copy of the business management formulae sheet is required for this examination
paper.
Section A: answer two questions.
Section B: answer question 4.
Section C: answer question 5.
A calculator is required for this examination paper.
The maximum mark for this examination paper is [60 marks].
2218 – 5011
7 pages © International Baccalaureate Organization 2018
–2– M18/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX
Blank page
–3– M18/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX
Section A
1. (a) With reference to Table 2, describe two advantages for Su of using a cash-flow
forecast. [4]
(b) With reference to Su and her managers at HH and AS, explain the differences between
leadership and management. [6]
2. (a) With reference to AK Bank, describe two features of for-profit microfinance providers. [4]
(b) Su is considering two possible locations for the production facility (lines 51–52).
Explain the factors (reasons) that Su may consider when deciding between the two
locations. [6]
3. (a) Describe two advantages for AS of using cellular manufacturing in the production of its
solar power systems. [4]
(b) Explain the advantages for Su of forming AS as a private limited company. [6]
Turn over
–4– M18/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX
Section B
4. It is now mid-2019. Production of solar power systems has been going for over a year and sales
have exceeded forecasts and reached 5000 systems for the year. Profits have been reinvested
into developing new outlets and distribution channels for solar power systems in Afghanistan.
Lean production techniques have enabled AS to keep costs low, but AS has had some quality
issues: some cells produce lower quality systems than others. AS has found faults in components
bought from suppliers. Some solar power systems have been damaged in the supply chain.
Salima is thinking of instituting total quality management (TQM). She also needs to forecast sales
for 2020 but has decided the situation is not suitable for a four-part moving average.
The possibility of a joint venture encouraged managers and investors to think about whether AS
should grow. In response, Su decided to analyse the possibility of growth through change using a
force field analysis of AS.
(Question 4 continued)
Team of volunteers
keen to make even 3 Resistance to change 2
more of a difference
Possibility of bringing
Too much
in new ideas from 2 3
responsibility for Su
external recruitment
The business is
2
already high risk
(b) With reference to AS, explain the difference between commercial marketing and social
marketing of the solar power systems (line 53). [4]
(c) Explain how total quality management (TQM) could help AS improve the quality of its
products. [4]
(d) Using information from the case study, additional information from pages 4 and 5
and appropriate business tools, discuss the value to Su of the force field analysis in
deciding whether to grow through change. [10]
Turn over
–6– M18/3/BUSMT/HP1/ENG/TZ0/XX
Section C
If AS goes ahead with the joint venture in 2019, there will be consequences it will need to face.
DF would have majority ownership in the joint venture, provide most of the senior managers, and
is likely to expect changes in the way AS operates. AS would have to significantly increase the
production of solar power systems and would have to restructure. Some managers may lose
influence over decisions. Su is worried that her Afghanistan project (AS) would take second place.
Having a close working relationship with DF would reduce AS’s risk of failure. Employees at AS
have heard rumours about the joint venture and are unhappy with the idea. They fear a loss of
identity, being overwhelmed by a much larger organization and possibly losing their jobs. Su is
concerned that resistance to change, particularly by employees and managers, is going to be an
important consideration in the decision. However she sees the situation as a huge opportunity to
make a real change in young people’s lives.
AS would invest $1 million. The net cash inflows to AS (ignoring inflows to DF and before
deduction of the investment cost) are forecast to be $0.4 million per year, giving a net present value
(NPV) at 6 % discount rate of $0.68 million and a payback of two years and six months. Su gives
the project a life of five years.
The research and development section of AS has developed a portable electricity generation
system based on biomass, a biomas power system (BPS), as an alternative to solar power
systems. A new factory costing $3 million will be needed. BPS will be particularly useful to those
communities that keep cattle − the dung* produced provides the fuel for BPS. Su has assembled
some relevant information.
(Question 5 continued)
Start Mid-2019
Likely level of BPS sales per year 10 000 (target level of sales)
Risk High
Using the case study, additional information on pages 6 and 7 and appropriate planning
tools, recommend whether Su should choose Option 1, Option 2, or neither. You will find it
useful to calculate the ARR for Option 1. [20]