Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Darwin Was A Teleologist: James G. Lennox Cite This Article

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Darwin was a teleologist

 James G. Lennox 

Biology and Philosophy volume 8, pages409–421(1993)Cite this article


 550 Accesses
 67 Citations
 6 Altmetric
 Metricsdetails

Abstract

It is often claimed that one of Darwin's chief accomplishments was to


provide biology with a non-teleological explanation of adaptation. A
number of Darwin's closest associates, however, and Darwin himself, did not
see it that way. In order to assess whether Darwin's version of evolutionary
theory does or does not employ teleological explanation, two of his
botanical studies are examined. The result of this examination is that Darwin
sees selection explanations of adaptations as teleological explanations. The
confusion in the nineteenth century about Darwin's attitude to teleology is
argued to be a result of Darwin's teleological explanations not conforming
to either of the dominant philosophical justifications of teleology at that
time. Darwin's explanatory practices conform well, however, to recent
defenses of the teleological character of selection explanations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

1. Appel, Toby A.: 1987,The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in


the Decades Before Darwin, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Google Scholar 

2. Ayala, F. A.: 1970, ‘Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary


Biology’,Philosophy of Science 37, 1–15.

Google Scholar 
3. Barrett, Paul (ed.): 1977,The Collected Papers of Charles Darwin (Two
Volumes in One), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Google Scholar 

4. Barrett, Paul et al. (eds.): 1987,Charles Darwin's Notebooks: 1936–1844,


Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Google Scholar 

5. Beatty, John: 1985, ‘Speak of Species: Darwin's Strategy’, in David


Kohn (ed.),The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, NJ. pp. 265–282.

Google Scholar 

6. Beatty, John: 1990, ‘Teleology and the Relationship Between Biology


and the Physical Sciences in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’
in Durham and Purringtion (eds.),Some Truer Method: Reflections on
the Heritage of Newton, Columbia University Press, New York, pp.
113–144.

Google Scholar 

7. Binswanger, Harry: 1990,The Biological Basis of Teleological Concepts,


Any Rand Institute, Los Angeles.

Google Scholar 

8. Brandon, Robert: 1981, ‘Biological Teleology: Questions and


Explanations’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12, 91–105.

Google Scholar 

9. Brandon, Robert: 1990,Adaptation and Environment, Princeton


University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Google Scholar 
10.Cornell, John F.: 1986, ‘Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the
Problem of Organic Teleology’,Isis 77, 405–421.

Google Scholar 

11.Darwin, Charles: 1964,On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First


Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google Scholar 

12.Darwin, Charles: 1984,The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids are


Fertilised by Insects, Second Editon, Revised, With a New Foreword by
Michael Ghiselin, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Google Scholar 

13.Darwin, Francis: 1887,The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (3 vols.),


John Murray, London.

Google Scholar 

14.Darwin, Francis: 1892,Charles Darwin, His Life Told in an


Autobiographical Chapter and in a Selected Series of his Published
Letters, D. Appleton and Co., New York. Reprinted by Dover
Publications, New York, 1958.
15.Ghiselin, Michael T.: 1969,The Triumph of the Darwinian Method,
University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Google Scholar 

16.Gray, Asa: 1963, ‘Natural Selection Is Not Inconsistent with Natural


Theology’, in A. Hunter Dupree (ed.),Asa Gray: Darwiniana, Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google Scholar 

17.Huxley, T. H.: 1898, ‘Criticisms on the Origin of Species’ (reprinted


from 1864),Darwiniana, Appleton, New York.
Google Scholar 

18.Lennox, James G.: 1992, ‘Teleology’, in Elizabeth Lloyd and Evelyn Fox
Keller (eds.),Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google Scholar 

19.Lenoir, Timothy: 1982,The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in


Nineteenth Century German Biology, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.

Google Scholar 

20.Mayr, Ernst: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Belknap Press of


Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google Scholar 

21.Mayr, Ernst: 1988,Towards a New Philosophy of Biology, Belknap Press


of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google Scholar 

22.Ospovat, Dov: 1981,The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural


History, Natural Theology and Natural Selection, 1839–1859,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Google Scholar 

23.Ruse, Michael: 1988,Philosophy of Biology Today, State University of


New York Press, Albany, NY.

Google Scholar 

24.Salmon, Wesley C.: 1990,Four Decades of Scientific Explanation,


University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

Google Scholar 
25.Whewell, William: 1833,Astronomy and General Physics Considered
with Reference to Natural Theology, Pickering, London.

Google Scholar 

26.Williams, George G.: 1966,Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton


University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Google Scholar 

27.Wimsatt, William C.: 1972, ‘Teleology and the Logical Structure of


Function Statements’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3, 1–
80.

Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations
1. Department of History and Philosophy of Science 1017 Cathedral
of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, 15260, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
James G. Lennox

Additional information

I would like to thank John Beatty, David Hull and one of this journal's
readers for constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article


Lennox, J.G. Darwin was a teleologist. Biol Philos 8, 409–421 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857687
Download citation
 Issue DateOctober 1993
 DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857687
Key words

 Adaptation

 Darwin

 final cause

 natural selection

 plant sexuality

 teleology
Access options
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.

41,94 €
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Buy article PDF

Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

74,90 €
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Buy journal subscription

Rent this article via DeepDyve.


Learn more about Institutional subscriptions

 Sections
 References

 Abstract
 References
 Author information
 Additional information
 Rights and permissions
 About this article

Advertisement
Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips
Switch Edition

 Academic Edition

 Corporate Edition

 Home

 Impressum

 Legal information

 Privacy statement

 California Privacy Statement

 How we use cookies

 Manage cookies/Do not sell my data

 
 Accessibility

 Contact us

Not logged in - 86.120.251.65


Not affiliated
Springer Nature
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.
Your privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and
advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do
so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our
website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note
that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy
policy
Manage Settings Accept All Cookies

You might also like