Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

How Does Analysts' Forecast Quality Relate To Corporate Investment Efficiency?

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

How does analysts' forecast quality relate to corporate

investment efficiency?

Related literature and hypothesis development

1.Management incentives, availability of capital, and investment efficiency:


The reasons for the ineffective investment may be due to the conflict of interest
between management and shareholders and the main constraints faced by the
company. The negative impact of moral hazard and the problem of adverse
selection for the investment efficiency can be reduced by improving the
information environment of the company and effective monitoring is done by
shareholders, financial institutions and other stakeholders.
*The adverse selection problem: When the company's insider ownership
information superiority on the real value of the company and have the incentive
to release capital is too high or issued capital when the company was
overvalued. However, with limited information, external capital suppliers can
be suspicious and respond by increasing the company's external financial costs.
The problem of adverse selection not only affects equity financing, but also debt
financing, for which lenders, who possess less information than borrowers, will
require a higher cost of debt that squeezes out “good borrowers”.
*The principal-agent conflict or moral hazard problem: most of this is due to the
difference between managerial incentives and shareholder interests. Instead of
enriching shareholders, managers have other privacy goals, arrogance and
inconsistency of managers and thus lead to inefficient investments.

2. Analyst forecast quality and investment level: Information intermediary and


monitoring agent review : A timely and transparent information environment
and an effective monitoring mechanism can help prevent managers from
making investment decisions that deviate from the optimal level, and that is also
the function of analysts. There is a large body of literature documenting the
roles of financial analysts as intermediaries of information between companies
and investors.
*Financial analysts have an information advantage by providing both public and
private information to individuals and institutional investors.
*Financial analyst forecasts help minimize information asymmetry between
insiders of the company and external capital suppliers and between managers
and shareholders.
*Expert analysis from external analysts is expected to play a monitoring role
that helps to increase the investment efficiency of firms by constraining
management from making suboptimal investments and reducing firms' cost of
capital.
Based on the above views, we hypothesize that, analyst forecasts provide
valuable information on and monitor firms' investment activities, leading to
higher investment efficiency of firms. Specifically, we expect that the quality of
analyst earnings forecasts help to reduce over- and under-investment by firms
and we form the following hypothesis:
+analysts' forecast quality is positively associated with investment efficiency
+analysts' forecast quality is negatively associated with investment efficiency.

3. Analyst forecast quality and investment level: market pressure view


When stock prices fall and do not meet market expectations, the managers of
these companies experience reduced compensation, , a greater likelihood of
turnover and loss of reputation. Therefore, analysts are expected to put pressure
on regulators or defeat income standards, which could give rise to adverse
effects such as short-termism and behavior opportunity

You might also like