Dancing Disorder in Mobutu's Zaire: Animation Politique and Gendered Nationalisms
Dancing Disorder in Mobutu's Zaire: Animation Politique and Gendered Nationalisms
Dancing Disorder in Mobutu's Zaire: Animation Politique and Gendered Nationalisms
Three Women
Ma Ntima sits with her hands gently clasped in her lap, wearing a
simple tailored top and matching pagne, with a piece of fabric tied to
cover her head. Her teenage son sits next to her on the sofa, on her left
side. She understands my questions in French but is more comfortable
responding and clarifying in Kikongo, and so her son acts as the trans-
lator. We sit on opposite sides of a coffee table, sipping red Vitalo soft
drinks.1 Our interview takes place in Luozi, in the home of the profes-
sor with whom I am staying. Ma Ntima was born in Luozi territory in
1959 and continues to reside there. She is married, the mother of six
children, and the wife of a pastor of an African Independent church.
She has a reserved demeanor, with a calm, serene air about her. In the
middle of our interview, it begins to rain heavily, and the sound of
raindrops pelting the window provides the ambient backdrop as she
recounts her own experiences. After our interview, she continues on to
a meeting with other local women of the Protestant churches in Luozi,
lifting her pagne slightly as she navigates the puddles created by the
rain.
Ma Bangoma greets me with the hearty handshake and genuflection
(dekama) used by many of the women in town, and when I respond in
kind, she laughs with delight. Our interview also takes place in Luozi,
and we chat briefly and snack on peanuts and soda before Tata Nkolele, a
middle-aged man who helped to arrange our meeting, arrives to take part
in the conversation with us. A married mother of eight children, she was
born in 1953 in Luozi territory and currently resides in the town of Luozi. She
works as a functionary of the state. She often responds to my questions with
laughter and eagerly demonstrates several songs and dances over the course
of the interview, showcasing her expertise as a performer.
Ma Mayazola spent a significant part of her youth back in Luozi terri-
tory, where her family is from, but now lives in the Mont- Ngafula neigh-
borhood in Kinshasa. After several rides in crowded taxi buses and a long
twisting walk through sand-covered paths, my friend Laurent and I arrive
at her small, one-level home. It is situated near some of the urban gardens
giving the neighborhood a sense of being a village inside a big city. Born in
1953, she is married, the mother of eight children, and farms for a living. She
is also a member of Bundu dia Kongo, a religious-sociopolitical organization
(non-Christian) with the goal of rebuilding the precolonial Kongo Kingdom
(see chapter 6). She interrupts our interview several times to sharply call out
orders to her children as she chops greens over a large pot simmering on an
outdoor fire, preparing the evening meal for her family.
While they all have different personalities and life trajectories, these three
women have much in common; they are from the same ethnic group (Kongo/
BaManianga), all have ties to Luozi territory, all are married, and all have
children. However, another tie that binds them is a common experience—in
their youth, primarily during the 1970s, they were all dancers in local per-
formance troupes of animation politique during Mobutu Sese Seko’s rule. I
examine the gendered dynamics of the interrelationship of power and per-
formance in Zaire through their stories. Using their experiences I specifically
ask, what can we learn about the ways that citizenship is gendered by look-
ing at coerced embodied performances? How is the civil religion of Zaire—
the worship of Mobutu and his ideas—made real by and through women’s
physical bodies?
In this chapter, I seek to recover the voices of women and their expe-
riences as performers in many different settings as subjects of an oppres-
sive nation-state. The sexual exploitation of female dancers emerges as a
prominent theme in my interviews. By focusing on the experiences of young
Kongo women recruited into local animation troupes in rural Luozi terri-
tory, I examine the ways their participation as citizens in Zaire was a form of
gendered embodied citizenship that differed from the experiences and expec-
tations of male dancers, and more specifically, was subject to the intimate
violence of the state.2 I build on Achille Mbembe’s work on the banality of
166 • chapter 5
power by examining the experiences of women in their engagement with a
coercive state—one demanding specific performances from them, both on
and off the stage. I argue that the penetrative forms of gendered embod-
ied citizenship that young women experienced in Zaire clearly differed from
the experiences of their male counterparts and fostered negative sentiments
among local communities, thus undermining the nationalist project. Thus,
my investigation of women’s experiences of animation politique in Luozi will
illuminate the gendered dimensions of performed nationalisms in everyday
life.
168 • chapter 5
While Matadi’s response paints a picture of happiness and choice, the por-
trait that emerges in recollections of women performers in animation troupes
in Luozi territory presents a direct contradiction. When each woman was
asked about the objectives of political animation, their responses were very
similar. Ma Mayazola said people danced for the glory of Mobutu, and Ma
Ntima reiterated the same notion with her response of “during the time of
Mobutu, it was obligatory to dance for Mobutu whether you wanted to or
not” (Ma Ntima, October 10, 2005, and Ma Mayazola, October 5, 2005). Ma
Bangoma responded with, “You were obligated . . . to go and sing political
songs. . . . It was animation” (Ma Bangoma, October 14, 2005).
In discussing how they came to perform in these troupes, all three women
mentioned the importance of coercion, although some described this in
greater detail than others. When asked how she came to be a dancer in a
group of political animators, Ma Mayazola explained she was chosen from
her village in the sector of Kivunda by virtue of her age and marital status:
“They took the young men and women from the village to go; it was oblig-
atory, to go and sing and dance for the head of the sector. . . . They took the
youth that were single and who were not students in school, women who had
one or two kids but were not married, and young men who were not married,
people who were unemployed. If you refused to go, they would send soldiers
to get you and take you by force, and they would take you to the sector town,
and you would pay a fine” (Ma Mayazola, October 5, 2005).
Ma Mayazola explained this group of selected youth formed the jmpr for
the village. The state’s focus was largely on youth who could be thought of as
unproductive and idle—unemployed, unmarried, and not enrolled in school.
Ma Mayazola was about eighteen years old when she began to dance with
the troupe. What is clear here is the importance of coercion in recruitment,
such that one’s refusal to participate would lead to intervention and force by
soldiers.
For Ma Ntima, who was chosen to dance while living in her village in
the sector of Mbanza-Mona, the story is similar: “They would choose single
people, those whose marriages were not recognized by the state, girls who
left school. I left the school because my mother was sick, and for this, I was
chosen. . . . The chief of the village helped to choose people because he knew
whether they were married, studying, or not” (Ma Ntima, October 10, 2005).
Ma Ntima’s account reiterates the state’s focus on pursuing “idle” youth for
the dance troupe. Her response also demonstrates the complicity of village
chiefs in selecting youth for recruitment.4 Similar to Ma Mayazola, Ma Ntima
was eighteen years old when she was recruited to dance.
170 • chapter 5
Mama Ntima depicts similar circumstances in her story of the typical,
deplorable transportation conditions she endured while a member of her
troupe: “When an authority came to our village to tell us we had to perform
in another place, for example if we had to go to Nkundi, we would go from
the village to Luozi, and from there to Nkundi. . . . They would take the car
of a man that they saw as having a lot of money and use it to transport us. . . .
We walked from the village [six hours of walking] to Luozi, and from there
the truck would take us to Nkundi. . . . Even if you were in the fields . . . you
must stop work and leave. . . . There were no words to say. . . . When we came
to Luozi we slept on the floor in the compound of Hotel Madou” (Ma Ntima,
October 10, 2005).
Both Ma Ntima’s and Ma Mayazola’s narratives reveal that animation was
a disruptive force in their lives. They had to stop whatever work they were
doing and heed the call to dance in faraway parts of the territory. While they
were expected to fulfill their duties as citizens performing in these local ani-
mation troupes, the state did not consistently uphold its part of the bargain
to transport, feed, or lodge the performers.
While Ma Ntima’s story was similar to Ma Mayazola’s, the situation was
rather different for Mama Bangoma, since she was an animatrice for the
entire territory and was called to travel often to other cities and towns in the
district to learn new songs and dances that she in turn would teach to the ani-
mation groups of each sector in the territory of Luozi upon her return. The
state took care of her needs: “They gave transportation. There were state ve-
hicles. . . . There was food brought by the state itself . . . housing also by the
state . . . clothes also” (Ma Bangoma, October 14, 2005). Clearly, while Ma
Bangoma was not paid, she received many other benefits for her services to
the state.
Thus, the position one held in the overall hierarchy of political anima-
tion affected the performance conditions, accommodations, and the types of
gifts (if any) that the person received. Some women clearly benefited more
than others from their participation as performers in local animation groups
in Luozi territory. These multiple perspectives and experiences of anima-
tion politique relate directly to Achille Mbembe’s notion of conviviality in
subject-state relations in postcolonial Africa, as everyday relations cannot be
simply defined as collusion or resistance. The fact that individuals were able
to benefit socially, politically, and even economically from animation while
others saw their participation as negatively impacting their lives complicates
a simple black-white perspective on animation.6
The rehearsal schedules each woman reported also reveal great differences
in the time allocated in their lives to these animation troupes as well as their
172 • chapter 5
building had once been a site for both vibrant performances of animation
politique and the sexual exploitation of young women during Mobutu’s era.
Both of the women volunteered this information about the sexual exploita-
tion of female dancers (one very early on in the interview), which leads
me to believe that it was very important for them to clearly state that such
a practice existed and was commonplace. However, neither woman went
into a lot of detail about their experiences in this regard. It makes one won-
der about the personal impact of such policies on these women and others
that they knew and danced with during the time in question. Perhaps they
wanted to avoid memories of past experiences, or just didn’t feel comfortable
sharing further information with me at that time. In both cases, at least one
other person was present at the time of the interview, and that likely also
influenced the depth of their responses. Seeking to respect their privacy, I
did not delve any further, intuitively feeling that it was not appropriate to
pry. Such an approach, where researchers simply “point toward silences”
out of respect for interview participants is also characteristic of a femi-
nist approach to social research (DeVault and Gross 2007, 184). The sexual
exploitation of young women during Mobutu’s era was, however, an “open
secret.” Bob White mentions people talking about the common practice of
“offering the sexual services of female singers and dancers to visiting poli-
ticians and dignitaries” (2008, 78), while Georges Nzongola-Ntalaja refers
to women who could better their fortunes and careers if they surrendered
body and soul to the mpr (2002, 167). This practice was also confirmed
by Dr. Mbala Nkanga, who directed theater productions during Mobutu’s
regime and observed similar practices (July 19, 2007, Michigan).8 The state’s
expectation that female performers should have sexual encounters with poli-
ticians and other powerful male figures (regardless of the women’s consent)
makes their engagement with the state unique and different from the duties
required of male performers. This is the gendered embodied citizenship
defining how these female performers thought about their relationship to
the state. Similar expectations of sexual performances were also held for
girls and women attending secondary schools and universities (Mianda 1995;
Schoepf 2002). While the three women I interviewed did not give extensive
details at the time, other people in the community (specifically men) had
explicit opinions about such practices and their impact on local communi-
ties. Before exploring their perspectives, however, I would like to examine
the types of social and political discourse that were used to justify this sexual
exploitation that, while not openly discussed, was endemic during Mobutu’s
regime.
174 • chapter 5
exploitatively unequal flow of resources with authoritarian overtones” (1988,
89–90).
In sum, when Mobutu invoked “family” (from the point of view of a
citizen of Zaire) it created a more natural and personal relationship. Achille
Mbembe echoes Schatzberg’s findings when he writes that “an intimate tyr-
anny links the ruler with the ruled” in postcolonial Africa (Mbembe 1992,
22), suggesting that citizens in Zaire expected President Mobutu to take care
of them and guide them as a father would. However, he was a father on two
levels; father of the nation, and father of each citizen. This led to a treacherous
ambiguity that allowed Mobutu and his government officials to manipulate
this relationship at their convenience: “Since all he does is, by definition, for
the benefit of the corporate family, he can assert his actions always place
the good of the whole uppermost. . . . If then, an unlucky or disadvantaged
citizen should invoke his personal relationship with the father and request
or expect nurturance, Mobutu can claim he has acted for the good of the
entire clan” (Schatzberg 1988, 91). Thus, ideas of “family” as applied to nation
also served to ideologically justify behaviors and actions that often negatively
impacted the individual citizens.
The numerous propaganda outlets that promoted Mobutu as a “Father”
to the nation also presented a discourse of feminine liberation and equality
to the masses. However, the state’s larger discourse on women and their role
in society had many contradictions. Speaking at the conclusion of a sympo-
sium on women in Zaire on May 20, 1975, President Mobutu proclaimed that
his takeover of the government in 1965 had liberated the women of Zaire:
“November 24, 1965, was not only the date that marked the beginning of
our total independence . . . but equally the start of the liberation of women
in all forms” (1975, 587). The concept of liberation was given short shrift,
however, just seven years later in another speech given at the third regular
conference of the mpr: “We want to recognize in the Zairian mother the
rights that give her the quality of equal partner to men. But it remains under-
stood that . . . there will always be in each family one boss. . . . The boss . . .
is he who wears the pants. Our female citizens must also understand that,
accepting it with a smile and a revolutionary submission” (Mobutu 1983,
693). These two quotes reveal a stark contradiction; while the buzzwords of
liberation and equality are used in state discourse, the president himself sees
limits in the authority and decision-making power of women in their own
households and families. He is clearly promoting a patriarchal system in
which women (who he largely refers to as mothers and wives) are to remain
subservient to their husbands.
176 • chapter 5
local communities, a theme that also tied into some of the information pro-
vided by the female interviewees. Tata Nkolele, the program director for a
local ngo, had this to say:
There are certain girls for example, who were incorporated into these
groups, who weren’t old . . . who weren’t old enough to be able to be
carried in front of the general public. . . . For the population, it wasn’t a
good thing that all of these girls were exposed to presenting shows. . . .
There was a certain exaggeration because the girl who danced . . . it was
pleasing for the politico-administrative man. . . . In fact, it distanced the
people who sometimes were horrified to watch all these dances, which
were considered as obscene. . . . These youth that were recuperated for
the needs of the party, sometimes for two weeks to learn songs, slogans,
to please . . . the revolution. For two weeks they are absent from their
work environment. Look what it does to the economy of their area and
to them themselves. It is this that makes it so that many young girls
found themselves pregnant as a result of all of these absences. . . . There
were young girls who discovered their sexuality too early. (October 14,
2005)
One of the first observations Tata Nkolele makes about girls dancing in
jmpr troupes was that some of the girls who performed in public were not
old enough for such activities. This indicates that the performative duties of
the nation are disregarding local concepts of age-appropriate conduct. He
also notes that some of the dances were considered by those watching (the
parents and families of the girls) to be obscene, and this led to them distanc-
ing themselves from the dances—this sentiment very clearly contradicts with
the goals of national animation policies, which seek to use performance to
create unity and a sense of national belonging. He also indicates that there
was an economic impact from the absence of youth who were recruited to
perform—in Luozi territory, a largely agricultural community, the physical
labor of large numbers of young men and women who are removed for several
weeks would have a detrimental impact on harvesting and other agricultural
activities. Removing this population for animation activities also undermined
Mobutu’s policy of salongo—obligatory collective work—which in Bas-Zaire,
was largely based on agriculture.9 Moreover, Tata Nkolele also discusses unin-
tended pregnancies, which can impact local families and communities in a
number of ways, such as disrupting prearranged marriages; leaving the girl’s
family without bride wealth; and leaving the dancer, her family, and larger
community responsible for the child, without the benefits of marriage. This
is further complicated by the fact that the majority of the Congolese popu-
178 • chapter 5
of one’s parents” (September 29, 2005). All these interview excerpts express
several interrelated themes that recur in people’s remembrances and assess-
ments of animation politique: moral corruption, sexual exploitation, and
disruption of families and local communities. For unmarried women who
were not enrolled in school, animation presented a threat to their very bod-
ies. As another interviewee explains, “it was a danger for girls” (Ne Tatu,
October 10, 2005). This danger was not only moral but a physical one as well.
What justification can be given for young women expected or even forced
to give the most intimate part of themselves to complete strangers? Return-
ing again to the metaphor of father and family, Schatzberg notes that one
aspect of acting as a “big-man” and “father-chief ” for Mobutu is generously
distributing wealth in gifts to his subjects. In return, Zairian citizens are sup-
posed to morally reciprocate his generosity (1988, 80–81). However, in the
case of these young women dancing for jmpr, they are the gift—one that is
being freely “given” to other government officials and even visiting politicians
(White 2008, 78). Thus, kinship and sexuality intersect, which, if one accepts
the family metaphor, not only allows for “incest” between Mobutu as father
and female citizens as children, but justifies it as good for the well-being of
the national family.
There seem to be conflicting understandings of morality in this instance.
For Mobutu and other government officials in Zaire, the “right” thing for
female citizens to do was to willingly comply with requests for sexual ser-
vices, for the good of the nation. However, in a majority-Christian nation,
these acts of sex, outside of marriage, were not seen by most of these women
or their families as “right” or “good.”
While some women used these sexual liaisons as opportunities for
improving their lot through connecting to wealthy politicians and state offi-
cials, for others the moral repercussions and potential negative impact on
their families and own lives loomed large (for example, pregnancy, diseases
such as hiv, and psychological trauma. One scholar, in explaining how aids
became a huge public health problem in the social context of the large-scale
sexual exploitation of girls and women in Zaire, called it “Mobutu’s disease”
(Schoepf 2002). What cannot be lost in the larger discussion of the situation
of female performers is the elimination of choice, whether the coercion was
explicit or subtle. The consequences of saying no to Mobutu or his represen-
tatives—imprisonment, fines, outright rape, and even death11—likely guided
the decisions and the actions of these women. Forced sex is rape, even if
the women cannot explicitly say no. With the aforementioned examples, the
sexual exploitation of women in the service of the “nation” during Mobutu’s
era is likely the most extreme exercise of political authority and state control
180 • chapter 5
received word that an authority was coming . . . everyone went down, they
attended. . . . It was good for the dancers. . . . It was obligatory” (October 14,
2005). Mama Bangoma’s overall assessment of political animation is quite
positive, which reflects her past higher status in the animation hierarchy. This
is not surprising since she gained social mobility and status and was able to
travel and more than likely was able to use her position as an animatrice to
get an even better job with the regime. Thus, it is probably not a coincidence
that it is she, among the three women, who currently has a civil service job
with the government.
On the other hand, Mama Ntima disagrees. Mama Ntima says that “it
was bad because . . . like here in Luozi, people wanted to pray, and when
they [other people] were dancing stupid dances, it was obligatory, and it
wasn’t good for the people” (October 10, 2005). For her, dancing and singing
for jmpr clearly violated her ideals and values as a Christian woman whose
church explicitly bans participation in secular dancing. In fact, Mama Ntima
chose to escape by getting married early, since couples in state-recognized
marriages were not forcibly recruited into these local jmpr groups to dance
for the regime. She was in the group in 1977 and got married in 1978.
Mama Mayazola also seemed to view political animation as a negative
social phenomenon: “For me it was torment. I was tormented. . . . To take
this long journey . . . to leave your work in the fields and all that you have as
an occupation, you must drop it to go and dance for someone, without being
paid, without being given food, without being lodged. It was practically a
punishment. . . . This movement created disorder . . . in the village, for the
fact that there was obligatory traveling. . . . In the songs there was nothing
else but the glory of Mobutu” (October 5, 2005). Ma Mayazola’s comments
highlight the economic consequences of animation. In an area where the
vast majority of the population makes its living through agriculture, unex-
pected rehearsals and performances depleted the area of an important source
of labor.
Ma Mayazola’s overall assessment of animation as negatively impacting
her life was also reflected in the ways she sought to avoid her embodied
national service. She ran away when her animation group was traveling out of
the sector to the town of Luozi. She also often feigned sickness to evade per-
forming obligations. Others who were caught dodging their dancing duties
were taken to the chief of the sector to be punished by paying fines or doing
hard physical labor. Ma Mayazola was in the group from 1971 to 1973, until
she, like Ma Ntima, was married.
The varied responses from these women support Mbembe’s statement
that “the postcolonial relationship is not primarily a relationship of resis-
Conclusion
State-scripted nationalism through public performances was hugely impor-
tant as a tool of creating (or attempting to create) nationalist sentiment in
many nations in postcolonial Africa. The specific case of animation politique
in Zaire reveals the importance of constant and omnipresent public perfor-
mances for spreading the ideologies of Mobutu’s government, whether people
agreed with it or not. Moreover, animation politique impacted people in both
urban areas and rural and marginalized parts of the country; thus, it can be
considered an extreme form of the banality of power in the former Zaire.
My interviews with three different Kongo women about their experiences
with animation politique, as well as interviews with men in the community
in Luozi, suggest that a more complex understanding of engagement with
the state at the level of the body needs to be considered in studies of per-
formed state nationalism. Specifically, different citizens engaged with the
state through animation politique in different ways. An analysis that privi-
leges gender and embodiment reveals the complex and multifaceted meaning
of citizenship through performance in Mobutu’s Zaire. Following from overt
sexual exploitation of female ex-performers, their experiences of animation
reveal a gendered embodied citizenship differing considerably from how
male performers engaged with the state. The performative encounters that
these women had with government officials in the bedroom made the state
a very intimate presence in their lives and in their bodies. The expectation
of sexual performances also goes along with the deification of Mobutu as a
leader as he was the model par excellence in his own sexual exploitation of
182 • chapter 5
women during his regime. While the stated intention of animation was to
inculcate the messages of Mobutu into the very bodies of Zaire’s citizens, the
actual outcome, specifically in regards to the sexual exploitation of young
women in rural animation troupes, was quite different. Animation politique
led to moral disorder and disengagement from the nationalist project by not
only some of the female dancers, but also their families and communities.
However, even these negative outcomes were not shared by all—men and
women who were able to benefit from animation politique largely saw it as
a positive experience. These findings suggest that the banality of power in
postcolonial Africa cannot be fully understood until the diverse experiences
of all citizens—both men and women—are taken into account. The intimate
tyranny Mbembe discussed must be expanded to include the unique experi-
ences of girls and women who were forced to engage, by and through their
bodies, with a coercive state seeking to consume them sexually.